Topic:"Residential Energy Affordability Program" in M04819

E-ENSC-R-12 Line# 1 ABLE 1 (2015) Alloca ation of 25% of p rogram cos ts associated with system ben efits Existing New Homes Constructi Efficient products Home Energy Report Prescriptive Custom Small Business Education & Outreach Developme...

AI summary The document presents a table detailing the allocation of program costs associated with system benefits in 2015, including various categories such as efficient products, home energy reports, and education & outreach. The table includes figures for different program categories and their respective costs.

Plug-in Lamp Bulbs Light Bulb Type Residents Most Likely to Use More Regular bulbs (over 50% of plug in lamp bulbs) • Residents of Mainland Nova Scotia • Under the age of 35 • Heat home with oil or electricity CFL (over 50% of plug in lamp...

AI summary The document discusses the usage patterns of different types of plug-in lamp bulbs in Nova Scotia, highlighting that regular bulbs are more commonly used by younger residents and those heating with oil or electricity, while CFL bulbs are more frequently used by older residents heating with alternative energy sources.

Residents are generally correct when estimating the number of LED bulbs in their home, with at least three-quarters of residents correctly estimating their permanent, plug-in and outdoor LED light bulbs.

AI summary Residents in Nova Scotia are generally accurate in estimating the number of LED bulbs in their homes, with at least 75% correctly identifying their permanent, plug-in, and outdoor LED light bulbs.

Number of Hours You Have Turned on Plug-In Lamp Bulbs on a Typical Day Q.A8: [POSE A8 ONLY IF RESPONSE TO A7 IS ONE OR MORE] Now we would like you to think of a typical day. About how many hours, on average, do you have turned on each of t...

AI summary The text asks respondents about the typical number of hours they use plug-in lamp bulbs. Cape Breton residents, renters, and those with lower incomes are more likely to use these bulbs for longer periods. Older residents also tend to use them more frequently.

as gone up while one-third reported no change in their energy bill or that it has not been long enough to know (32%). Table 16: Changes Noticed in Energy Bills Since Implementation Effect on Energy Bill 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 23 70 70...

AI summary The text discusses changes in energy bills and customer satisfaction with a program. Most respondents reported no change or a decrease in their energy bills, and the majority were satisfied with the program, although some dissatisfaction was noted due to unmet expectations and eligibility issues.

rtner: Score: Name of partner: Score: Name of partner: Score: Q10a – If any of your answers to Q8 was equal to or less than 8, would you care to share the reason or reasons for such a score? Q11 – Who provides you with leads for potential...

AI summary The document contains a series of questions aimed at gathering feedback on the Low Income Program and other related initiatives managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It explores issues such as program name changes, implementation challenges, complaints from partners, and barriers to program execution.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Q9b1- If you answered Too Few or Too Many, please comment: Q10- On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is very bad and 10 is excellent), how would you rate your relationship with the othe...

AI summary The text contains survey questions from the 2011 Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Evaluation Report, focusing on program partner relationships, program name changes, and program modifications. It includes questions about leads, confusion in the market, and complaints from partners.

2010 Prescriptive (U) Custom (F) Small Business Energy Solutions (F) Efficient Products - Direct Install (F) Residential/Charitable - 19 108 2,079 Small General 1 7 245 1,605 General Demand 153,382 49 420 1,427 Large General 148,584 3 - 49...

AI summary The text presents data on energy usage and programs related to energy efficiency, including residential, commercial, and industrial categories, with a focus on rebates and energy solutions in Nova Scotia from 2010 to 2012.

VP2. [IF VP1 = 2 'NO'] Why not? [DO NOT READ – MULTIPLE RESPONSES] - 1. (Is not worth the expenses) - 2. (No family members or friends that could be eligible) - 3. (Concern that actual bill savings would be less than estimated) - 4. (Lack...

AI summary The document lists reasons why individuals may not participate in a program, including concerns about cost-effectiveness, lack of information, and perceived insufficient incentives. It also includes options for specifying other reasons or refusing to participate.

PA3 Score: FR2c. In the absence of the program, what is the likelihood that you would have replaced or substituted your heating system with one that did not use electricity but at a later date? (Scale 0 to 10) (10 - FR4_P) x 10%) IF FR2c >...

AI summary The text outlines a scoring methodology (PA3 Score) used to assess the likelihood of replacing or substituting a heating system with a non-electric alternative at a later date. It includes a conditional question (FR2c) and a follow-up (FR2cc) to determine the timing of such a replacement, with specific percentage allocations based on the response.

Table 46: Household Income Household Income 2012 Sample Size 181 Less than $15,000 1% $15,000 - $24,999 2% $25,000 - $34,000 5% $35,000 - $49,000 16% $50,000 - $69,000 20% $70,000 - $79,000 9% $80,000 or more 27% Don't know/Refused 21% The...

AI summary Table 46 presents household income distribution data from 2012, showing a sample size of 181 participants. The majority (27%) had incomes of $80,000 or more, while 21% did not know or refused to disclose their income. The sample was nearly evenly split between males (53%) and females (47%).

Would it have been within . . . - 1. Less than 6 months? - 2. 6 months to less than 1 year later? - 3. 1 to less than 2 years later? - 4. 2 to less than 3 years later? - 5. 3 to less than 4 years later? - 6. 4 or more years later? - 7. (Ne...

AI summary The text presents a series of questions regarding the timing of energy efficiency measures and customer willingness to pay for them. It includes options for responses related to timeframes and payment intentions, indicating a focus on customer behavior and program participation in energy efficiency initiatives.