E-22023 DSM Programs Evaluation Reports
252 passages
Table 1: 2023 Portfolio Evaluation Plan PY2023 Program Components Impact Process Market Residential DSM Program Components Appliance Retirement Condensed Instant Savings Comprehensive Home Energy Assessment Comprehensive Green Heat Condens...
AI summary Table 1 outlines the 2023 Portfolio Evaluation Plan, detailing various program components under residential and BNI DSM programs, including their impact, process, and market evaluations. The plan includes condensed and comprehensive evaluations for initiatives like Appliance Retirement, Home Energy Assessment, and Strategic Energy Management.
Measure Assessment The impact evaluation scope for 2023 also included an update of the Measure Assessment (MA) document. The MA was updated to include new products added to program offerings, 5 remove products that are no longer offered, 6...
AI summary The 2023 Measure Assessment (MA) document was updated to include new products, remove outdated ones, and adjust parameters for existing measures. Changes include the addition of ENERGY STAR certified dishwashers, removal of certain products, and updates to savings parameters for LED lighting, refrigerators, and freezers. The document also reflects changes in program offerings such as the inclusion of air sealing products and the rebranding of appliance replacement programs.
1.2 Process and Market Evaluation Objectives and Scope A market evaluation was completed in 2023 for mini-split heat pumps (MSHPs) under Green Heat. Market evaluation activities were aimed at achieving the following objective: › Analyze th...
AI summary A market evaluation for mini-split heat pumps under Green Heat was completed in 2023. Four process evaluations were conducted for Green Heat, Custom Retrofit, Strategic Energy Management, and Small Business Energy Solutions to analyze market evolution and program logic models.
Table 3: 2023 Interviews Completed Program Component Manager1 Program / EOne Staff/Business Development Manager Service Provider/ Distributors/ Contractors Participants Dropped Out or Overdue Participants Retailers Residential Appliance Re...
AI summary Table 3 summarizes the number of interviews completed in 2023 across various program components, including managers, service providers, participants, and retailers. The table highlights the distribution of interviews by program, showing the number of interviews conducted with different stakeholders.
Table 4: 2023 Project Reviews with Follow-up Site Visits or Interviews Program Component Project Reviews Followed by Site Visits Project Reviews Followed by Phone Interviews Total Project Reviews BNI Small Business Energy Solutions 42 - 42...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the number of project reviews conducted in 2023 under various program components, including site visits and phone interviews. The data highlights the distribution of reviews across different initiatives such as Small Business Energy Solutions, Strategic Energy Management, and Custom programs. Energy Model Reviews are also mentioned as a separate section.
Table 5: Comparison of 2023 Evaluated and Tracked Energy Savings at the Generator a Tracked Results Evaluated Results DSM Program Program Component Annual Gross Savings (GWh) Annual Net Savings (GWh) Annual Gross Savings (GWh) NTGR b Annua...
AI summary Table 5 compares the evaluated and tracked energy savings for various demand-side management (DSM) programs in 2023. The table highlights the gross and net annual energy savings, net-to-gross ratios, lifetime net energy savings, and net realization rates for residential and BNI programs, showing overall energy efficiency achievements.
Table 6: Comparison of 2023 Evaluated and Tracked Peak Demand Savings at the Generator a Tracked Results Evaluated Results DSM Program Program Component Annual Gross Savings (MW) Annual Net Savings (MW) Available Capacity (MW) Annual Gross...
AI summary Table 6 presents a comparison of evaluated and tracked peak demand savings for various demand-side management (DSM) programs in 2023. It includes data on residential, BNI, and demand response programs, with metrics such as annual gross and net savings, available capacity, and net realization rates.
3.1.1 Residential DSM Programs
AI summary This section discusses residential demand-side management (DSM) programs, focusing on initiatives aimed at improving energy efficiency and reducing consumption in residential areas.
Existing Residential In 2023, the net energy savings of Existing Residential reached 41.722 GWh while the net peak demand savings amounted to 13.042 MW at the generator. Existing Residential is comprised of Home Energy Assessment, Green He...
AI summary In 2023, the Existing Residential program achieved 41.722 GWh of net energy savings and 13.042 MW of net peak demand savings. The program includes initiatives like Home Energy Assessment, Green Heat, and the Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency Project.
Table 8: 2023 Evaluated Net Lifetime Energy Savings at the Generator DSM Program Program Component Annual Net Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Net Energy Savings (GWh) Weighted Average EUL (years) Share of Annual Net Energy Savings (%) Share...
AI summary Table 8 presents the 2023 evaluated net lifetime energy savings by DSM program and component, highlighting the contribution of residential, BNI, and overall programs to annual and lifetime energy savings. The table includes energy savings metrics such as GWh, weighted average EUL, and percentage shares. Section 3.4 discusses greenhouse gas emission reductions.
4.1 Participant and Partner Satisfaction The 2023 evaluation revealed high participant satisfaction with EOne and its programs. Home Energy Assessment, Green Heat, Custom (regular Retrofit and Solar PV), SEM, and Small Business Energy Solu...
AI summary The 2023 evaluation showed high participant satisfaction with EOne and its programs, including Home Energy Assessment, Green Heat, and Small Business Energy Solutions. Program partners were generally satisfied, though Green Heat contractors expressed lower satisfaction with the program component.
Table 10: 2023 Satisfaction Results DSM Program Program Component Participant Satisfaction Partner Satisfaction Residential Residential Efficient Product Rebates Instant Savings - 8.8 Existing Residential Home Energy Assessment 8.3 - Green...
AI summary Table 10 presents 2023 satisfaction results for various demand-side management (DSM) programs, including participant and partner satisfaction scores for components like instant savings, home energy assessments, and strategic energy management. The data highlights varying levels of satisfaction across different program components and participant categories.
Table 11: 2023 Planned Net Savings and Evaluated Results Planned Savings Evaluated Results Variance Program Component and DSM Program Net Energy Savings (GWh) Net Peak Demand Savings (MW) Available DR Capacity (MW) Net Energy Savings (GWh)...
AI summary Table 11 presents the 2023 planned net savings and evaluated results for various energy efficiency and demand response programs in Nova Scotia. It highlights performance variances between planned and actual outcomes, such as the Home Energy Assessment program exceeding planned savings by 74% and the Appliance Retirement program underperforming by 16%.
\ \ \ Residential Behaviour was not launched in 2023 and therefore did not generate any savings. \ \ Numbers may not add up due to rounding . The EOne portfolio of DSM program components achieved 131.569 GWh in total net electrical energy...
AI summary Residential programs achieved significant energy and peak demand savings in 2023, exceeding planned targets by 13% and 20% respectively. EOne BNI programs exceeded energy savings targets but fell short of peak demand savings. Custom Incentives and Direct Installation underperformed in energy savings.
Table 12: Evaluated Net Energy Savings at the Generator, 2018-2023 Energy Savings (GWh) Energy Savings (%) a DSM Program Program Component 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Residential Residential Appliance Retirement 2.545...
AI summary Table 12 presents evaluated net energy savings from various DSM programs in Nova Scotia between 2018 and 2023, showing energy savings in GWh and percentages for different program components such as appliance retirement, efficient product rebates, and home energy assessments.
Table 14: 2023 Recommendations on Residential Program Components No. Recommendation Instant Savings – R1 Review the incented models in the LED non-A type lamps (R, BR, Decorative) category and phase out in 2024 any models that are no longe...
AI summary The document outlines 2023 recommendations for residential program components, including phasing out outdated LED lamp models, improving billing analysis methods, and enhancing marketing materials for Green Heat and Home Energy Assessment programs.
e_2069155_210820-161936.pdfé) Econoler, Évaluation du programme thermostats électroniques – Volet nouvelle construction au marché résidentiel, Final Report presented to Hydro-Québec, February 9, 2009 Statistics Canada. (2016). Census Profi...
AI summary The document contains bibliographic references to studies and reports related to energy efficiency programs, including evaluations of thermostat programs and census data from Statistics Canada. These references are used to support analysis in the regulatory proceeding.
Program Components Bibliographic References Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, Matter M06555, 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update, Exhibit N-2.09, Appendix 1 GDS Associates. Measure Life Report Residential and Commercial/Industri...
AI summary The document references various programs and studies related to energy efficiency and affordability in Nova Scotia, including the Affordable Multifamily Housing and Single-family Homes programs, along with supporting documents and evaluations from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board and Nova Scotia Power.
RESIDENTIAL EFFICIENT PRODUCT REBATES PROGRAM Final Report 2023 DSM EVALUATION March 6, 2024 In collaboration with:
AI summary The final report on the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program provides an evaluation of the 2023 DSM plan, focusing on program performance and outcomes. It includes collaboration with various partners and is part of a broader regulatory proceeding.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the 2023 demand-side management (DSM) evaluation results of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program administered by EfficiencyOne (EOne). This program is comprised of two components: (1) App...
AI summary This report evaluates the 2023 demand-side management (DSM) results of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program, administered by EfficiencyOne (EOne), which includes two components: Appliance Retirement (ARet) and Instant Savings.
Table 1: Summary of 2023 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Evaluation Program Evaluation Type Component Impact Process Market Methodology Appliance Retirement Condensed › Tracking sheet audit › Unitary savings review › Calculat...
AI summary The 2023 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Evaluation includes components such as Appliance Retirement and Instant Savings Comprehensive, with evaluation methods involving tracking sheet audits, participant surveys, and avoided GHG emission calculations.
[Table](#page-70-0) 2 presents the participation levels, net-to-gross ratios (NTGRs), evaluated gross and net savings at the generator, annual GHG emission reductions, as well as effective useful life (EUL) values for each program componen...
AI summary Table 2 details participation levels, net-to-gross ratios, evaluated gross and net savings, annual GHG emission reductions, and effective useful life values for the 2023 Residential Efficient Product Rebates program.
1.1 ARet Description Through ARet, EOne promotes the retirement of old, inefficient household appliances such as refrigerators, freezers, room air conditioners, and dehumidifiers. ARet educates Nova Scotians about the cost of maintaining o...
AI summary ARet is a program led by EOne that promotes the retirement of old, inefficient household appliances in Nova Scotia. Participants receive financial incentives for retiring eligible appliances, which are then recycled by ARCA Canada Inc. The program aims to achieve significant energy savings by removing outdated appliances from homes.
5.3 Participation History In 2023, a total of 217,125 eligible products were sold in participating stores across Nova Scotia, which represents an increase of 9% compared to 2022, and an increase of 8% compared to 2021. As presented in [Tab...
AI summary In 2023, sales of energy-efficient products in Nova Scotia increased by 9% compared to 2022, with notable growth in ENERGY STAR certified LED lamps and appliances, although some categories like solar fixtures and control products saw declines.
Table 21: 2023 Instant Savings Tracked and Evaluated Unitary Peak Demand Savings Product Tracked Savings [W/year] Evaluated Savings [W/year] ENERGY STAR Certified LED Non-A-type Lamps (R, BR, and Decorative) 7.63 7.97 ENERGY STAR Certified...
AI summary Table 21 presents the 2023 Instant Savings Tracked and Evaluated Unitary Peak Demand Savings for various energy-efficient products. The data compares tracked savings with evaluated savings, showing discrepancies in some cases, such as for dimmer switches and motion sensors where evaluated savings show no change.
Table 24: Evaluated 2023 Instant Savings Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings Product Category LED Non- Lamp LED Recessed Downlight LED EN ERGY STAR Fixtures Fixtures Dimmer Outdoor R, BR, and Decorative Others Fixtures Without Motion Sens...
AI summary Table 24 presents evaluated 2023 Instant Savings Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings across various product categories, including LED lamps, fixtures, and outdoor devices. It details energy savings values, interactive effects factors, and lifetime energy savings at the generator level.
Table 28: 2023 Instant Savings Free-Ridership for LED Lamps and Fixtures Product Potoilor Free-ridership Evaluation Number of Units Weighted Average Free-Ridership Category Retailer Period Level Margin Error Sold in 2023 Level Margin of Er...
AI summary Table 28 presents free-ridership evaluation data for LED lamps and fixtures sold in 2023 through the Instant Savings program, including free-ridership levels and margin of error for Costco and non-Costco retailers. The Evaluator considered free-ridership values for all other products rebated through Instant Savings to be nil.
CONCLUSION [Table](#page-121-1) 34 presents the participation levels, NTGRs, evaluated gross and net savings at the generator, annual GHG emission reductions, as well effective useful life (EUL) values for each Residential Efficient Produc...
AI summary Table 34 summarizes participation levels, NTGRs, evaluated gross and net savings, annual GHG emission reductions, and effective useful life (EUL) values for the 2023 Residential Efficient Product Rebates program, both by component and overall.
Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit ARet Energy Savings 4,260 Appliances 3.010 GWh 0.56 1.698 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 12.008 GWh 0.56 6.776 GWh Peak Demand Savings 0.430 MW 0.56 0.2...
AI summary The Residential Efficient Product Rebates program exceeded its 2023 targets for net electrical energy and peak demand savings by 16% and 35%, respectively. Instant Savings was the primary contributor to these achievements. The table details energy savings, peak demand savings, GHG emission reductions, and equivalent useful life across different program components.
[ASK THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS IF AWARE OF THE DISCOUNT [(D1=](#page-137-2)1) OR [(D2=](#page-137-1)1), OTHERWISE SKIP TO SECTION [H]](#page-145-0) - D3. Before the beginning of the rebate campaign on September 29th, were you aware that disc...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to consumer behavior regarding LED bulb purchases, including awareness of discounts, purchase timing, and alternative bulb choices if discounts were not available.
3. [SHOW IF [E1](#page-140-1) (IF CORRECT) OR [E2.](#page-140-2)2 > 1 FIXTURE] Both - E6. [IF E1 (IF CORRECT) OR E2.2=1 FIXTURE] For which of the following reasons did you buy this LED fixture? [ALLOW ONLY ONE CODE] - 1. To replace a fixtu...
AI summary The text outlines a survey or data collection process related to the purchase and installation of LED fixtures, including reasons for purchase and types of bulbs being replaced. It includes conditional logic for different scenarios based on the number of fixtures and installation purposes.
I. Demographics These final questions are asked for statistical purposes only. The information collected is strictly confidential and will only be used in group results. - I1. What type of residence do you live in? [ACCEPT ONLY ONE CODE] -...
AI summary This section collects demographic information about residents for statistical purposes. It asks about the type of residence and whether the residence is owned or rented, with options for different housing types and responses.
B8. [ASK IF B1 (MORE THAN 1 BULB)] You bought [INSERT NUMBER OF LEDS FROM B1] LED bulbs? How many, if any, of these [INSERT NUMBER OF LEDS FROM B1] LED bulbs will be installed… 2023 2022 2021 Sample Size 81 49 67 To replace another LED bul...
AI summary The text presents a survey question and results about the installation of LED bulbs, including how they are being used (e.g., replacing other LED bulbs or non-LED bulbs) and the percentage of respondents who installed them in new fixtures across different years.
C1/F1. Have you ever heard of the Efficiency Nova Scotia program that offers instant savings at the cash register for the purchase of energy-efficient lighting, controls or appliances? 2023 2022 2021 Sample Size 122 177 120 Yes 65% 65% 58%...
AI summary The Efficiency Nova Scotia program offers instant savings at the cash register for energy-efficient purchases. Awareness of the program has remained relatively stable between 2021 and 2023, with around 65% of respondents being aware. In-store promotions and store personnel are the primary sources of awareness, followed by in-store engagement events and the Efficiency Nova Scotia website.
- D2. To confirm, you did not know about the discount on specific LED bulbs before paying at the register? 2023 2022 2021 Sample Size 81 49 67 Yes, was aware of discount before paying 48% 67% 52% No, was aware of discount before paying 52%...
AI summary The text asks whether the respondent was aware of a discount on specific LED bulbs before paying at the register. It includes a table showing the percentage of respondents who were aware of the discount in 2021, 2022, and 2023.
D7. How likely would you have been to buy the LED bulbs that you purchased if you had to pay the full price? Please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, with a 0 indicating that you "Definitely Would Not Have Bought these LEDs" and a 10 indicatin...
AI summary This question asks respondents about their likelihood of purchasing LED bulbs at full price, using a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating they definitely would not have bought them and 10 indicating they definitely would have.
E3. Did you purchase these fixtures for your own use (for example, for your home or cottage)? 2023 2022 2021 Sample Size 41 128 53 I purchased them for my own use 98% 97% 96% I purchased them for a client or project outside of my organizat...
AI summary The table shows that the majority of respondents purchased LED fixtures for their own use, with 98% in 2023, 97% in 2022, and 96% in 2021. A small percentage purchased them for clients or projects outside their organization, and even fewer reported both or other purposes.
E4. Are there any LED fixtures currently installed in your home (other than those you just bought)? 2023 2022 2021 41 128 53 80% 84% 77% 15% 14% 17% 5% 2% 6% E5. Will the LED fixture(s) you bought be installed indoor or outdoor? 2023 2022...
AI summary The text presents data on the number and percentage of LED fixtures installed in homes in Nova Scotia across the years 2021, 2022, and 2023, as well as the intended installation locations (indoor, outdoor, or both) for recently purchased LED fixtures.
F3. The day you recently bought the LED light fixture(s), did you see signs or posters in the light fixture section of the store promoting the discount offered on LED fixtures? 2023 2022 2021 Sample Size 41 128 53 Yes 76% 37% 62% No 20% 52...
AI summary The question asks whether respondents saw promotional signs or posters for LED light fixture discounts when purchasing them. The table shows response rates for 2021, 2022, and 2023, with the majority of respondents indicating they saw such promotions in recent years.
- G2. [DO NOT ASK IF 'YES' IN G1] To confirm, you did not know about the discount on specific LED fixtures before paying at the register? 128 53 71% 43% 66% 57% 34% - - 27% 2% G3. Thinking about your purchase of LED fixtures, what best des...
AI summary The text discusses customer awareness and purchasing behavior related to LED fixtures, highlighting that a majority of respondents were unaware of discounts offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia before making purchases. It includes survey data from different years showing changes in customer behavior.
I1. What type of residence do you live in? 2023 2022 2021 Sample Size 122 177 120 Detached single-family house 86% 84% 91% Semi-detached house 7% 5% 3% Townhouse or duplex which share adjacent walls 2% 3% 3% Apartment or condo building tha...
AI summary The text presents survey data on residence types, ownership, electricity bill payment, income, household size, and gender from 2021 to 2023. It includes percentages and sample sizes for each category, highlighting trends over time.
Table 1: Overview of Data Collection Activity Descriptor This Instrument Instrument Type Interview guide Estimated Time to Complete 25 min Target Audience Head office retailers Expected Number of Completions 8 Contact List Source EOne Fiel...
AI summary The document outlines data collection activities involving an interview guide targeting head office retailers, with a focus on research objectives related to LED bulbs and the Instant Savings program. The fielding firm is Narrative Research, and the timeline is November to December.
[ASK THIS SECTION IF NON A-TYPE LED BULB RETAILER] - C1. Efficiency Nova Scotia has promoted LED lighting and offered rebates through retailers on LED bulbs for a number of years. I would like to understand how your participation in the In...
AI summary The text includes survey questions for retailers regarding their participation in the Instant Savings program and its impact on staff and consumer knowledge, product offerings, and sales of Non A-type LED bulbs. It also asks about the influence of Efficiency Nova Scotia's programs on sales outside of rebate periods.
DEFINITIONS Accuracy Reflects the proximity of measurements to the true value. 26.2.4 Effective Useful Life 145 26.2.5 Evaluated Gross Savings145 26.3 Net Savings 147 26.3.1 Evaluated Net Savings148 26.4 Realization Rate 148 27 ASFH Key Fi...
AI summary The document defines key terms related to energy efficiency evaluations and includes a list of tables summarizing program evaluations, participation data, and savings metrics for residential energy programs in 2023. It outlines the methodology used to assess the effectiveness of energy-saving measures and provides an overview of findings and recommendations.
Table 1: Summary of 2023 Existing Residential Program Evaluation Program Evaluation Type Methodology Component Impact Process Market HEA Comprehensive › Participant survey › Tracking sheet audit › Billing analysis › Solar photovoltaic (PV)...
AI summary Table 1 provides a summary of the 2023 evaluation of existing residential programs, including methodologies such as participant surveys, tracking sheet audits, and avoided GHG emission calculations. Programs like HEA, Green Heat, EPI, MHEEP, AMH, and ASFH are evaluated for their impact and process effectiveness.
Table 2: Overall 2023 Existing Residential Participation and Evaluated Savings Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit HEA Energy Savings 4,085 Participants 30.581 GWh 0.85 25.966 GWh Lifet...
AI summary The table presents 2023 participation levels and evaluated savings for various residential energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, including energy savings, GHG emission reductions, and effective useful life (EUL). The data highlights the performance of different programs such as Home Energy Assessment (HEA), Green Heat, Efficient Product Installation (EPI), Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency Project (MHEEP), Affordable Multifamily Housing (AMH), and Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH).
Green Heat Findings and Recommendations This subsection presents the key findings from the Green Heat evaluation. 2023 Green Heat-Finding: Green Heat fell short of its net savings targets in 2023, achieving 80% of its net energy savings ta...
AI summary The 2023 Green Heat evaluation found that the program underperformed its energy and peak demand savings targets, with participation declining by 11% compared to 2022. Mini-split heat pumps saw a 22% drop in participation, while the Canada Greener Homes Grant and HEA programs gained traction due to higher incentives. Customer and contractor satisfaction with Green Heat is low, citing issues with rebates, marketing, and program communication.
1.1 HEA Description HEA is a home energy evaluation-based program component that encourages homeowners to improve the energy efficiency and comfort of their home by providing them with related information and financial incentives in the fo...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program provides homeowners with evaluations and rebates to improve energy efficiency. It collaborates with Natural Resources Canada and includes a CGH Grant for retrofits. The program has seen changes in assessment fees, eligibility, and eligible measures, with some incentives now solely funded by the CGH Grant.
Solar PV Savings Calculation Review To determine the appropriate savings calculation approach for solar PV systems installed through HEA, Econoler analyzed the information available in the tracking sheet and reviewed the tracked unitary sa...
AI summary Econoler reviewed the savings calculation approach for solar PV systems installed through HEA, analyzing the tracking sheet and EOne's unitary savings values based on SolarHomes results. The 2020-2023 Measure Assessment was updated accordingly.
3.1 Satisfaction with HEA There was a high level of satisfaction with HEA overall, with an average rating of 8.3. 5 Participants who were less satisfied (27%) mentioned that it took too long to receive their rebate (44%), which was likely...
AI summary Participants expressed high satisfaction with the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program, with an average rating of 8.3. However, 27% of participants were less satisfied, citing issues such as delays in receiving rebates, unclear program requirements, and difficulties accessing information. The Net Promoter Score (NPS) for HEA was 62, indicating strong likelihood of participants recommending the program.
3.2 Suggestions for Improvement Although close to one-half (46%) of participants did not provide any recommendations to improve HEA, the remainder provided a variety of suggestions. HEA participants recommended speeding up the process (17%...
AI summary Participants in the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program were generally satisfied, with an average rating of 8.3, but some expressed dissatisfaction with the time taken to receive rebates and the difficulty in accessing information from the HEA website. Suggestions for improvement included speeding up the process and simplifying application procedures.
For solar PV measures introduced through HEA with the CGH Grant, savings correspond to an offset from the electricity grid and are calculated by using a tracked unitary savings value of 1,086 kWh per kW (size of the solar PV system). This...
AI summary The Evaluator determined a unitary savings value of 1,086 kWh per kW for solar PV systems installed through HEA using data from SolarHomes participants and applied a calibration ratio of 1.009 derived from a study comparing modelled and actual production data.
Table 13: 2023 HEA Tracked and Evaluated Unitary Peak Demand Savings for DHW Measures Measure Tracked Savings [W] Evaluated Savings [W] DHW Measures Solar DHW 0 No change Heat Pump Water Heaters – with Electric Resistance Baseline 140 191...
AI summary Table 13 presents tracked and evaluated unitary peak demand savings for domestic hot water (DHW) measures in 2023. It compares savings for different technologies, such as solar DHW and heat pump water heaters, under various baseline scenarios.
Table 14: 2023 HEA Tracked and Evaluated Unitary Peak Demand Savings for Demand Reduction Measures Measure Tracked Savings [W] Evaluated Savings [W] Demand Reduction Measures ETS Units Maximum Storage Capacity in 8 Hours / 16 Hours No chan...
AI summary Table 14 outlines the tracked and evaluated unitary peak demand savings for demand reduction measures in 2023 HEA. The table includes ETS units, three-element water heaters, and DHW heater timers. Interactive effects are discussed in section 4.2.4.
5 HEA Key Findings and Recommendations As mentioned previously, the main objectives of the 2023 HEA evaluation were as follows: - › Collect information on participant perspectives - › Calculate gross and net results, namely electrical firs...
AI summary The 2023 HEA evaluation found that the program exceeded energy and demand savings targets, with increased participation and average savings per home. Participant satisfaction was high, though delays in rebate processing were noted. Free-ridership levels were lower than previously tracked, and billing analysis results were inconclusive, prompting recommendations for further exploration and a revised evaluation approach for 2024.
6.1 Green Heat Description The Green Heat component of the Existing Residential program is aimed at encouraging the installation of energy efficient heating systems as well as heating systems for which fuel is provided from renewable resou...
AI summary The Green Heat component of the Existing Residential program encourages the installation of energy-efficient and renewable heating systems in Nova Scotia homes by offering financial incentives. EOne staff manages the program, and a midstream incentive pilot for electric thermal storage was introduced in 2021 but ended in 2022.
6.3 Participation History In 2023, the number of Green Heat measures installed decreased by 11% compared to 2022 levels, primarily due to a 22% drop in the number of installed MSHPs, as illustrated in [Figure](#page-28-0) 8 below. The laun...
AI summary Green Heat participation declined in 2023, with an 11% drop in installed measures, mainly due to a 22% decline in MSHP installations. This was influenced by the introduction of the Canada Greener Homes Grant, which attracted some participants to enroll in federal programs instead of Green Heat. Demand reduction measures remained stable, but overall savings were 10% lower than in 2022.
Distributor Interviews In November 2023, Narrative Research conducted five interviews with distributors that sell and install heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) products in Nova Scotia to gain deeper understanding of higheff...
AI summary In November 2023, Narrative Research conducted five interviews with HVAC distributors in Nova Scotia to understand trends in high-efficiency and standard MSHP sales. The interview guide is included in Appendix XII.
8.1 Awareness About Green Heat and Motivations for Participating As the results illustrate in [Figure](#page-32-0) 10 below, MSHP and biomass participants cite different sources of awareness about Green Heat. MSHP participants mentioned co...
AI summary The text discusses awareness of Green Heat among participants in MSHP and biomass programs, highlighting different sources of awareness and motivations for participation. MSHP participants cite contractors and word of mouth, while biomass participants rely more on online sources. The primary motivation for participation is saving money, either through rebates or future energy cost savings.
Table 27: Elements of Dissatisfaction and Justifications Element of Dissatisfaction (Score of <8) Reasons for Dissatisfaction/What Could Be Improved (#) n=11 Overall program › Communication issues/lack of information from EOne (4) › Eligib...
AI summary The table outlines elements of dissatisfaction with various programs, including communication issues, restrictive eligibility criteria, low incentive levels, and difficulties with online portals and application forms. Respondents highlighted the need for improved marketing, updated equipment lists, and more user-friendly interfaces.
More specifically: - › 11% of Green Heat participants identified a lack of website user-friendliness and related difficulties completing the online application form. - › 9% considered the application form confusing . - › 6% said that there...
AI summary The Green Heat program faces challenges with application completion, including user-friendliness issues, confusion, excessive paperwork, and difficulty finding required information. Contractors assist participants but note problems with incomplete forms and limited computer literacy, particularly among older applicants.
8.3.1 Participant Familiarity Nearly nine in ten (87%) Green Heat participants 15 report knowing that Home Energy Assessment ( HEA) enables access to the CGH Grant . Over one quarter of those who have heard of HEA/CGH Grant mention that th...
AI summary The text discusses participant familiarity with the Green Heat program and the CGH Grant, noting that 87% of Green Heat participants are aware of the HEA and CGH Grant. Contractors report that fewer than 20% of customers who know about both programs choose Green Heat, and that confusion between the two programs is high among customers.
Equipment Five contractors spontaneously mentioned that some of the equipment eligible for HEA/ CGH Grant is not covered under Green Heat or that, generally, the eligible equipment lists of the two do not match. Contractors understand that...
AI summary Contractors noted discrepancies between eligible equipment lists for HEA/CGH Grant and Green Heat, with the former requiring two heat pump units and covering whole home upgrades, while the latter allows for single unit eligibility and focuses on heating equipment.
8.4 Promotion and Recommendation Contractors were asked to spontaneously name the programs they mention to customers who contact them to learn more about available incentives for MSHPs. As [Figure](#page-41-0) 16 illustrates, CGH Grant ten...
AI summary Contractors frequently mention the CGH Grant more often than Green Heat when discussing incentives for MSHPs. They ask customers about rebate awareness, goals, and income to determine eligibility. Contractors recommend Green Heat only when customers don't qualify for CGH Grant or face time constraints. Promotion methods vary, with some using marketing materials and others relying on direct communication.
MSHP contractor quotes: "To promote more efficient heating equipment into the marketplace. … by far, HP industry is a money saver for homeowners. Great to be stressing how advantageous heat pumps are in terms of efficiency and cost." "Peop...
AI summary Contractors highlight the benefits of heat pumps and rebates in promoting energy efficiency but note that the Green Heat program lacks relevance due to the higher incentives offered by the CGH Grant. Five contractors believe Green Heat does not have a clear niche, and six emphasize that the CGH Grant provides better monetary value to homeowners.
Green Heat Challenges: - › Lacks relevance since the CGH Grant - › Low rebates vs. the CGH Grant - › Contractors having to provide customer support - › Communications with EOne - › Switch from oil to ETS not eligible
AI summary The text outlines several challenges related to the Green Heat initiative, including lack of relevance compared to the Community Grant for Homes (CGH), lower rebates than CGH, contractor responsibilities, communication issues with EOne, and ineligibility for switching from oil to Electric Thermal Storage (ETS).
8.6.1 Additional Support A variety of contractor suggestions are outlined below on additional support that could be provided by EOne to help contractors promote, educate about, or deliver Green Heat as efficiently as possible. These includ...
AI summary EOne is considering additional support measures for contractors to promote and deliver Green Heat programs more effectively, including education, promotional materials, and timely updates. Contractors show strong interest in attending educational events.
23 and a small decline in 2024 for secondary system installations. 29 20230620 NSPI to NSUARB 2023 Load Forecast Report + Appendices RED (Section 4.4, p.33). 23 Until 2012, EOne provided rebates for ductless MSHPs through EnerGuide for Exi...
AI summary The text discusses the market share of heat pumps in Nova Scotia, including historical data on the number of homes with heat pump systems installed from 2015 to 2024. It also outlines changes in rebate programs for heat pumps, including the transfer of incentives to the Fuel Substitution program in 2012 and the reintroduction of incentives in 2017, supported by federal funding until 2023.
HEA Mini-split Heat Pumps HEA also provides incentives for participants who install high-performing cold-climate MSHPs as part of a retrofit. Homeowners in Nova Scotia must register under HEA to receive the CGH Grant. EOne staff manage and...
AI summary HEA provides incentives for installing high-performing cold-climate mini-split heat pumps (MSHPs) as part of energy efficiency retrofits. Homeowners must register under HEA to receive the CGH Grant, which offers up to $5,000. The number of homes with MSHP installations increased significantly in 2022 and 2023, largely due to the CGH Grant's availability.
10.2.1 Green Heat Eligible Mini-split Heat Pumps The Evaluator interviewed five MSHP distributors in Nova Scotia to gain more in-depth understanding of MSHP market trends and sales of Green Heat-eligible high-performing cold climate MSHPs....
AI summary The Evaluator interviewed MSHP distributors in Nova Scotia to understand market trends and sales of Green Heat-eligible high-performing cold climate MSHPs. Distributors reported that a large proportion of their sales are high-performing units, but confusion and low incentives are barriers to Green Heat program participation.
2023 Green Heat-Finding: Green Heat participation levels decreased compared to 2021, particularly for MSHPs. With 1,783 measures installed, the 2022 participation level was the lowest observed for Green Heat since 2016. The 2022 participat...
AI summary Green Heat participation levels significantly decreased from 2021 to 2022 and again in 2023, especially for MSHPs. This decline is attributed to the integration of the CGH Grant into HEA, which offered higher incentives and attracted participants away from Green Heat.
2023 Green Heat-Finding: Most customers prefer HEA/CGH Grant over Green Heat, but Green Heat is a good option for a minority. Contractors say that fewer than two in every 10 customers who know about both Green Heat and HEA/CGH Grant choose...
AI summary Most customers prefer the HEA/CGH Grant over Green Heat, but Green Heat remains a viable option for some due to its simplicity, lack of home energy assessments, and faster rebate processing.
2023 Green Heat-Finding: There is confusion among customers about the differences between Green Heat and HEA/CGH Grant. Contractors say that they generally ask customers if they have already applied for a home energy assessment or to HEA/C...
AI summary There is confusion among customers about the differences between Green Heat and HEA/CGH Grant. Contractors report that many customers have already applied for HEA/CGH Grant, and those who do not qualify often apply to Green Heat instead.
2023 Green Heat-Finding: Overall satisfaction is lower among MSHP participants and contractors. Most Green Heat participants are highly satisfied with the program overall although satisfaction is higher among biomass participants than MSHP...
AI summary The 2023 Green Heat-Finding indicates that while most participants are satisfied with the program, satisfaction is lower among MSHP participants and contractors. Issues include rebate amounts, website usability, and communication with EOne. Recommendations focus on improving marketing, website navigation, and communication.
12.1 EPI Description EPI provides participants with free-of-charge direct installations of energy efficient products. EOne contracts service providers to deliver EPI across the province. EPI is available to both homeowners and renters and...
AI summary The Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program provides free installations of energy-efficient products to both homeowners and renters in Nova Scotia. EOne contracts service providers to deliver EPI across the province, and the program encourages participants to also consider other residential program components. Table 40 outlines the products available for installation in 2023 and their savings categories.
Table 40: 2023 EPI List of Eligible Products Products Electrical Savings Non-electrical Savings LED Lamps Including A-types, Reflectors, and Chandeliers X - LED Nightlights X - Faucet Aerators X X Low-flow Showerheads X X Thermostatic Show...
AI summary Table 40 lists eligible products for the 2023 Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, including LED lamps, smart thermostats, and insulation materials. The text also mentions a pilot installation of 97 smart thermostats for electric baseboards, which was paused when the installation of domestic hot water heater load controllers was paused.
Table 44: 2023 EPI Tracked and Evaluated Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values EPI – Single-family Homes EPI – Apartments Low-flow Showerheads (1.0 gpm) 60.6 No change 73.7 No change Thermostatic Shower Valves (2.5 gpm) 19.1 No change 23.2 No...
AI summary Table 44 presents the 2023 EPI Tracked and Evaluated Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for various energy efficiency measures in single-family homes and apartments, showing no changes in savings values for the listed items.
Table 49: Evaluated 2023 EPI Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings per Measure – Apartments LED Lamps Product Category 9 W Replacing 25 W 29 W 40 W 43 W 60 W 72 W 100 W 150 W Number of Units Number of Units 17 22 363 8 1,672 6 630 0 Install...
AI summary Table 49 evaluates the 2023 EPI Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings per Measure for apartments, including data on LED lamps, installation rates, energy savings, and peak demand savings. The table also includes factors like energy interactive effects, line loss factors, and effective useful life for each product category.
Table 54: 2023 EPI Net-to-gross Ratios by Product Category EPI LED Lamps Low-flow Showerheads Other Products Non-low income Participants Low-income Participants Non-low income Participants Low-income Participants Non-low income Participant...
AI summary Table 54 presents the 2023 EPI Net-to-gross Ratios by product category, showing varying ratios for different participant types and product categories. The data includes NTGR values and the proportion of gross savings by participant type, with overall NTGR values provided for reference.
Table 58: Evaluated 2023 MHEEP Overestimation Ratios Scenario ORD ORE A participant who registered with a heat pump 0% 0% A participant who registered without a heat pump and who did not have one installed 19% 19% A participant who registe...
AI summary Table 58 evaluates the overestimation ratios for the 2023 Mikmaw Home Energy Efficiency Project (MHEEP) under different scenarios. It shows varying percentages of overestimation depending on whether participants registered with or without heat pumps and whether they had one installed. The text also explains that participants with non-electrical space heating can generate both electrical and non-electrical savings, with the proportion of electrical savings determined by the assessment.
Table 59: Tracked and Evaluated 2023 MHEEP Unitary Energy Savings Measure Tracked Savings [kWh/year] Evaluated Savings [kWh/year] Programmable Thermostats 221 No change Smart Thermostats with Electric Resistance Baseline 348 No change Smar...
AI summary Table 59 presents tracked and evaluated energy savings for the 2023 Mikmaw Home Energy Efficiency Project (MHEEP), showing discrepancies between tracked and evaluated savings for various measures, with some measures showing no change and others showing increased savings.
Table 66: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated 2023 MHEEP Savings at the Generator Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Realization Rate Value Unit Value Unit Energy Savings Tracked Savings by EOne 0.575 GWh 1.00 0.575 GWh Evaluation Results 0.57...
AI summary Table 66 compares tracked and evaluated 2023 MHEEP savings at the generator level, showing that both energy and peak demand savings have a 100% realization rate, with no significant differences between tracked and evaluated results.
Table 70: Evaluated 2023 AMH Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings Comprehensive Prescriptive Total Heat Pumps Lighting Other Number of Projects 11 63 5 0 79 Energy Savings Tracked Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.118 1.162 0.057...
AI summary Table 70 evaluates the 2023 AMH gross energy and peak demand savings, including data on the number of projects, energy savings at the meter and generator, and peak demand savings. The table also includes factors such as line loss and effective useful life. Table 71 discusses GHG emissions reductions based on Nova Scotia-specific factors applied to AMH savings results.
24.1 ASFH Description ASFH provides energy efficiency retrofits to income-qualified Nova Scotian homeowners at no cost to participants. The program component is marketed to all Nova Scotian's (both electric and non-electric homes) under th...
AI summary The Affordable Single-Family Home (ASFH) program provides free energy efficiency retrofits to income-qualified Nova Scotian homeowners. It includes building envelope measures, moisture management, and appliance replacements. The program is delivered by six delivery agents and uses energy advisors for assessments. Electrical savings are evaluated, and the program is branded as 'HomeWarming'.
Table 73: 2023 ASFH Evaluation Approach Evaluation Objectives Research Questions Methodology Calculate gross results › Are the data in the tracking sheet complete, accurate, and consistent? › What are the savings for heating and building e...
AI summary Table 73 outlines the 2023 evaluation approach for the Affordable Single-Family Housing (ASFH) program. It includes objectives such as calculating gross and net results, research questions about data accuracy and savings, and methodologies like tracking sheet audits and savings calculations using tools such as HOT2000 and NTGR.
Table 77: Evaluated 2023 ASFH Modelled Measure Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings Total Energy Savings Gross Energy Savings Without Overestimation Ratio (OR) – at the Meter (GWh) 1.512 Gross Energy Savings with OR – at the Meter (GWh) 1....
AI summary The tables present energy and peak demand savings for the Affordable Single-Family Housing (ASFH) program in 2023, including modelled and non-modelled measures. The data includes gross energy savings, effective useful life, and peak demand savings, with adjustments for overestimation ratios and line loss factors.
Table 82: Overall 2023 Existing Residential Participation and Evaluated Savings Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit HEA Energy Savings 4,085 Participants 30.581 GWh 0.85 25.966 GWh Life...
AI summary Table 82 presents the participation levels and energy savings for various residential programs in 2023, including HEA, Green Heat, EPI, MHEEP, AMH, and ASFH. The table highlights gross and net energy savings, peak demand savings, GHG emission reductions, and effective useful life for each program.
A. Verification and Recall - A1. We understand you participated in the Home Energy Assessment program. Is that correct? - 1. Yes [CONTINUE] - 2. No, does not recall participating [PROMPT : "Are you sure? You may recall participating in the...
AI summary The text discusses a verification process regarding participation in the Home Energy Assessment program, including prompts for respondents who may have participated in the Greener Homes program. It includes options for continuing, refusing, or scheduling a more convenient time for the survey.
[ASK [B2](#page-160-0)[-B3](#page-160-1) IF ANY ITEM IN [B1](#page-160-2) A THRU I=1 ("YES, RECOMMENDED")] - B2. IF MORE THAN ONE ITEM IN [B1A](#page-160-2)-I=YES, READ : Through the Home Energy Assessment program, have you installed any r...
AI summary This text outlines a series of questions related to the Home Energy Assessment program, specifically asking if energy efficiency upgrades were installed and which ones. It includes options for responses such as installing at least one upgrade, installing all upgrades, or not installing any.
[ASK [B8](#page-162-0) IF A HEAT PUMP IS INSTALLED – IF [B4A](#page-161-0)=1, OR IF [B1A](#page-160-2)=1 AND [(B2=](#page-160-0)2 OR [B3=](#page-160-1)1)] - B8. Prior to installing your heat pump, did you already have a working air conditi...
AI summary The text contains a series of questions related to the installation of heat pumps and the likelihood of purchasing an air conditioner. It includes conditional logic based on prior responses and asks respondents to rate their likelihood on a numerical scale.
[ASK SERIES IF SOLAR PV INSTALLED = IF B4I=1, OR IF [B1I](#page-160-2)=1 AND [(B2=](#page-160-0)2 OR [B3=](#page-160-1)1)] Now I would like to ask you a series of questions regarding your decision to install a solar PV system for which you...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions aimed at determining whether the rebate for a solar PV system influenced the decision to install it. It asks if the installation was decided before the rebate was known and whether the rebate was a determining factor in paying for the system.
Series B: Questions on the decision to install a high-efficiency heat pump Only high-efficiency heat pump models are eligible for a rebate under the program, so the heat pump you installed is much more efficient than the standard heat pump...
AI summary The document contains questions regarding the decision to install a high-efficiency heat pump, focusing on awareness of available models and the impact of rebates on purchasing decisions. It explores whether respondents were aware of high-efficiency models before an energy evaluation and whether they would have purchased the model without the rebate.
0-10 SCALE WITH END POINT LABELS – RECORD NUMBER - 98. Don't Know - 99. Refused - E5. [IF B8=2, 98,99 AND [D1=](#page-164-0)3, 98, 99 OR [D2=](#page-165-0)2, 98, 99] If there were no program, which of the following actions would you have t...
AI summary The text presents a survey question asking respondents what action they would have taken if there were no program, with options including keeping existing systems, purchasing new systems, or buying a heat pump. The question is part of a 0-10 scale with endpoint labels and includes response codes.
- E7. If there were no program, what is the likelihood that you would have postponed the installation of the energy efficient upgrades by at least one year? Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused E8. I would like you to rate the importance of t...
AI summary The text presents a question regarding the likelihood of postponing energy efficient upgrades without a program and asks respondents to rate the importance of factors influencing their decision. The responses are largely unknown or refused, and the section is labeled as 'Cross-Influence'.
B1A-B1I. [Recommended upgrades for home - % YES] Can you please tell me if any of the following upgrades were recommended for your home by the energy advisor? 2023 Recommended Implemented Sample Size 100 100 Any type of heat pump, includin...
AI summary The document presents survey data on energy efficiency upgrades recommended for homes in Nova Scotia. It includes percentages of homes where upgrades were recommended and implemented, and details on installation rates, whether upgrades were part of house extensions or major renovations.
B9. If you had not installed a heat pump through your participation in the program, what is the likelihood that would you have purchased an air conditioner? Please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "Definitely not" and 10 is "Defini...
AI summary The question asks about the likelihood of purchasing an air conditioner if a heat pump had not been installed through a program, using a 0 to 10 scale.
D8. Efficiency Nova Scotia gave you a rebate for your new high efficiency heat pump. If you had not received the rebate, would you have paid the total cost of your high-efficiency heat pump? Please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 mea...
AI summary The question asks whether a rebate from Efficiency Nova Scotia influenced the decision to purchase a high-efficiency heat pump, using a scale from 0 to 10 to gauge the impact of the rebate on the purchase decision.
E6. If there were no program, which of the following actions would you have taken? 2023 Sample Size 3 (#) Kept your existing heating system 1 Purchased a heat pump 2 Base :Respondents who prior to installing their heat pump had a working a...
AI summary In the absence of a program, 1 out of 3 respondents would have kept their existing heating system, while 2 would have purchased a heat pump. This data is based on a sample size of 3 respondents who had a working air conditioner and no plans for upgrades.
F3. Because of your previous participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia program and what you learned by participating in the program, you asked for an energy assessment of your home. 2023 Sample Size 35 Agree 80% Disagree 20% Base : Respon...
AI summary The text discusses a home energy assessment request made by an individual who previously participated in an Efficiency Nova Scotia program. A survey from 2023 shows that 80% of respondents agreed with something, while 20% disagreed, based on a sample size of 35 participants who had previously taken part in ENS programs.
G3. Have you received rebates from other Efficiency Nova Scotia programs for the energy efficiency upgrades you installed on your own after participating in the Home Energy Assessment program? 2023 2020 Sample Size 19 8 (#) Yes 11% - No 89...
AI summary The question asks whether participants in the Home Energy Assessment program received rebates from other Efficiency Nova Scotia programs for energy efficiency upgrades they installed on their own. The data shows that in 2023, 11% of respondents received rebates, while 89% did not. In 2020, no responses were recorded for this question.
H3. What was the main reason you were not more satisfied with the program overall? 2023 Sample Size 27 Too long to get the money/rebate 44% Difficulty getting information/Trying to get information from the website 22% Program requirement/E...
AI summary The main reasons respondents were not more satisfied with the Home Energy Assessment program included difficulty in receiving rebates, unclear eligibility criteria, and issues with the program's website and information delivery. These factors contributed to overall dissatisfaction with the program.
APPENDIX IV HEA Detailed Methodology and Billing Analysis Results
AI summary This appendix provides a detailed methodology and billing analysis related to the Home Energy Assistance (HEA) program. It outlines the approach used to assess energy usage, costs, and the impact of energy efficiency measures on residential customers.
Selection of the Treatment and Control Groups The initial treatment group included 886 HEA participants who were selected based on the following criteria: - › Be 100% electrically heated according to HOT2000 (meaning that the primary heati...
AI summary The treatment group consists of 886 HEA participants selected based on specific criteria, including being 100% electrically heated and using HOT2000 version 11.10 or 11.11. The control group includes 2,315 past HEA participants with similar characteristics to ensure a matched comparison, using actual billing data rather than modelled consumption for analysis.
Participant Behaviour The other factors that add to the complexity of the data analysis are related to participant behaviour potentially driven by HEA. Indeed, HEA can generate effects other than the simple implementation of energy efficie...
AI summary The analysis highlights how participant behavior, influenced by the Home Energy Assistance (HEA) program, may affect energy savings estimates. Behavioral changes, such as reduced use of supplemental heating systems and home renovations, can impact the accuracy of savings calculations based on electricity bills. These factors were identified through surveys and may not be fully captured in billing data.
INTRODUCTION Could I speak with ? - 1. Yes [CONTINUE] - 2. No [SAY "PERHAPS YOU CAN HELP ME ANYWAY." CONTINUE] Hello, my name is ____________________ from Narrative Research, a Halifax based survey research company. We are performing an ev...
AI summary The introduction outlines a survey conducted by Narrative Research on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia to evaluate the Heating System Rebates program. Participants are contacted to provide feedback on their experience with the program, which offers rebates for home heating equipment installations.
[READ [A1](#page-18-1) IF ONE EQUIPMENT (EQUIPMENT #1 ONLY) IN THE DATABSE] - A1. Our records indicate that your household installed a through the Heating System Rebates program. Is this correct? - 1. Yes [CONTINUE TO [A4]](#page-19-0) - 2...
AI summary The text is a prompt from a regulatory proceeding document asking a household if they installed a specific equipment through the Heating System Rebates program. It provides options for confirmation and further action based on their response.
B. Awareness and Motivations for Participating - B1. How did you first become aware of the Heating System Rebates program? [DO NOT READ. SINGLE RESPONSE] - 1. In-store signage - 2. Retailer flyer - 3. Email - 4. Through a contractor or ins...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions about awareness and motivations for participating in the Heating System Rebates program, including how respondents learned about the program and their reasons for participation, such as energy savings, comfort, and environmental concerns.
[VOLUNTEERED] - 98. Don't know [GO TO G SECTION] - 99. Refused [GO TO G SECTION] - C5. [IF C1= 1 AND [C2=](#page-23-0)2, 98, 99 OR [C3=](#page-23-1)2, 98, 99] If there were no Heating System Rebates program, which of the following actions...
AI summary The text presents a series of survey questions related to the Heating System Rebates program, asking respondents what actions they would take if the program did not exist and how likely they would be to delay purchasing a heat pump. The questions are structured with response options and instructions for proceeding.
Series B: Questions on the decision to install a high-efficiency heat pump Only high-efficiency heat pump models are eligible for a rebate under the Heating System Rebates program, so the heat pump you have installed is much more efficient...
AI summary The text discusses a survey regarding the installation of high-efficiency heat pumps, focusing on customer awareness and decision-making influenced by rebate programs. It includes questions about prior knowledge of high-efficiency models and whether the rebate influenced the decision to purchase.
[0-10 SCALE WITH END POINT LABELS– RECORD NUMBER] - 97. Not applicable - 98. Don't Know/Don't recall - 99. Refused - G5. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "Completely disagree" and 10 is "Completely agree", how strongly do you agree or...
AI summary The text presents a scale from 0 to 10 for respondents to rate their agreement with statements about the ease of completing and understanding the Heating System Rebates application form. It includes options for not applicable, don't know, and refused.
[DO NOT ASK SECTION H IF = ELECTRIC THERMAL STORAGE] - H1. Moving along … Before today, did you know of, or had you ever heard of Efficiency Nova Scotia's Home Energy Assessment Program? The program provides rebates on heat pumps, insulati...
AI summary The text discusses the Home Energy Assessment Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia, which provides rebates for energy efficiency improvements. It asks participants how they learned about the program and whether they considered it over other rebate programs like Heating System Rebates.
I. Recommendations for Program Improvements - I1. Now thinking exclusively about the Heating System Rebates program, do you have any recommendations for improving the program? [PROBE] Anything else? [DO NOT READ. ACCEPT MULTIPLE KEEPING CO...
AI summary The document outlines recommendations for improving the Heating System Rebates program, including increasing rebate amounts, expanding eligible equipment, simplifying application processes, and enhancing program advertising and online portals.
B5. Have you ever heard of Electric thermal storage, or ETS? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 90 90 - 5 Yes, have ETS 61% 61% - 5 No, have not ETS 39% 39% - 0 Base: Respondents who installed a mini-split heat pump
AI summary The text presents a survey result indicating that 61% of respondents who installed a mini-split heat pump have electric thermal storage (ETS), while 39% do not. The data is broken down by year (2023) and other categories (MSHP, Biomass).
C3. Just to confirm: before you learned about the Heating System Rebates program, you had already made the decision to install a heat pump to heat your home? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 71 71 - - Yes 97% 97% - - No 1% 1% - - Refused...
AI summary The chunk confirms that the majority of respondents (97%) had already decided to install a mini-split heat pump before learning about the Heating System Rebates program, with only 1% refusing to answer and 1% indicating they did not make the decision beforehand.
C2/C3 COMBINED. Had you already decided to install a heat pump before you heard about the Heating System Rebates program? Just to confirm: before you learned about the Heating System Rebates program, you had already made the decision to in...
AI summary The question asks whether the individual had already decided to install a heat pump prior to learning about the Heating System Rebates program, seeking confirmation on their decision-making process.
2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 90 90 - - Yes 78% 78% - - No 21% 21% - - Refused 1% 1% - - Base: Respondents who installed a mini-split heat pump
AI summary The table shows survey results from respondents who installed a mini-split heat pump, with 78% indicating 'Yes', 21% 'No', and 1% 'Refused'. The sample size was 90 for both 2023 and MSHP categories, while Biomass and ETS had no data.
C4. If there were no Heating System Rebates program, which of the following actions would you have taken? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 14 14 - - Kept your existing heating system 36% 36% - - Kept your existing heating system and purch...
AI summary This question explores how respondents would have acted if the Heating System Rebates program did not exist. The data shows that 36% would have kept their existing heating system, 21% would have kept their system and purchased an air conditioner, and 36% would have purchased a heat pump.
C7. Were you aware that high efficiency heat pumps that operate at temperatures below -15°C were available before you heard about the Heating System Rebates program? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 79 79 - - Yes 70% 70% - - No 27% 27% -...
AI summary The question asks whether respondents were aware of high efficiency heat pumps operating below -15°C before the Heating System Rebates program. The table shows 70% of respondents were aware, 27% were not, and 4% were unsure, based on those who had already decided to install heat pumps or would have done so regardless of the program.
C8. Before you heard about the Heating System Rebates program, had you already made the decision to install a highefficiency heat pump model? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 55 55 - - Yes 84% 84% - - No 16% 16% - - Base: Respondents who...
AI summary The question asks whether respondents had already decided to install a high-efficiency heat pump before learning about the Heating System Rebates program. The data shows that 84% of respondents had already made the decision, while 16% had not.
2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 79 79 - - 10 - Definitely Would Have Paid 73% 73% - - 9 5% 5% - - 8 9% 9% - - 7 3% 3% - - 6 1% 1% - - 5 8% 8% - - 4 1% 1% - - 3 0% 0% - - 2 0% 0% - - 1 0% 0% - - 0 - Definitely Would Not Have Paid 0% 0% -...
AI summary The table presents survey results from respondents who installed mini-split heat pumps, showing a high willingness to pay (87%) with a mean rating of 9.2 out of 10 for both the 2023 and MSHP categories. The data highlights strong customer satisfaction and perceived value of the installed systems.
The program rebate 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS 79 79 - 16% 16% - 3% 3% - - 11% 11% - - 6% 6% - - 3% 3% - - 14% 14% - - 6% 6% - - 5% 5% - - 5% 5% - - 1% 1% - - 29% 29% - - 0% 0% - - 0% 0% - - 30 30 - - 4.6 4.6 - - - - Base: Respondents who instal...
AI summary The document presents a table detailing program rebate percentages for different technologies, including MSHP (mini-split heat pumps), Biomass, and ETS (Electric thermal storage) in 2023. The base for these rebates is respondents who installed mini-split heat pumps.
D1. Had you already decided to install a high efficiency before you heard about the Heating System Rebates program? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 29 - 29 - Yes 76% - 76% - No 21% - 21% - Don't know 3% - 3% - Based: Respondents installe...
AI summary The question asks whether respondents had already decided to install high efficiency equipment before learning about the Heating System Rebates program. The table shows that 76% of respondents had already decided, while 21% had not, based on installations of wood stoves, pellet stoves, wood furnaces, or wood fireplaces.
D2. Just to confirm: before you decided to participate in the Heating System Rebates program, you had already made the decision to install a ? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 22 - 22 - Yes 95% - 95% - No 5% - 5% - Based: Respondents inst...
AI summary The document asks whether respondents decided to install specific heating equipment before participating in the Heating System Rebates program. The table shows that 95% of respondents in 2023 and the MSHP group had already decided to install biomass or ETS equipment prior to learning about the program.
D1/D2 COMBINED. Had you already decided to install a high efficiency before you heard about the Heating System Rebates program? Just to confirm: before you decided to participate in the Heating System Rebates program, you had already made...
AI summary The text asks whether the respondent had already decided to install a high efficiency prior to learning about the Heating System Rebates program, seeking confirmation on the timing of their decision to participate in the program.
D4. If there were no Heating System Rebates program, what is the likelihood that you would have installed an electrical heating system instead of the you installed through the program? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 29 - 29 - MEAN 3.6 -...
AI summary The question asks about the likelihood of installing an electrical heating system without the Heating System Rebates program, with data showing a mean response of 3.6 for respondents who installed wood-based heating systems.
D5. If there were no Heating System Rebates program, what is the likelihood that you would have kept your old heating system instead of installing a new one? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 29 - 29 - MEAN 5.8 - 5.8 - Based: Respondents i...
AI summary The question asks about the likelihood of keeping an old heating system if the Heating System Rebates program did not exist. The table shows mean responses for 2023 and different heating system types, but no detailed discussion of the program's impact is provided.
D6. If there were no Heating System Rebates program, what is the likelihood that you would have postponed installing the by at least one year? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 29 - 29 - MEAN 4.1 - 4.1 - Based: Respondents installed a wood...
AI summary The question asks about the likelihood of postponing the installation of heating equipment if the Heating System Rebates program did not exist. The table shows a mean response of 4.1 for both 2023 and MSHP, with sample sizes of 29 for each category. Respondents installed wood stoves, pellet stoves, wood furnaces, or wood fireplaces.
E1. You mentioned earlier that your electricity rate with Nova Scotia Power is a time-of-day rate. Among the following three choices, which one best describes your decision-making process with regards to taking-part in the time-of-day rate...
AI summary The text asks respondents to describe their decision-making process for participating in a time-of-day rate with Nova Scotia Power, highlighting customer behavior and program participation.
E3. Just to confirm: before you decided to participate in the Heating System Rebates program, you had already made the decision to install a ? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 3 - - 3 Yes 2 - - 2 No 1 - - 1 Base: Respondents who installed...
AI summary The question seeks to confirm whether respondents decided to install ETS (Electric Thermal Storage) before participating in the Heating System Rebates program. A table shows that out of 3 respondents who installed ETS, 2 had already decided to do so prior to learning about the program.
F1. Before participating in the Heating System Rebates program in 2023, had you at any time in the past participated in any Efficiency Nova Scotia program or service? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 113 79 29 5 Yes 47% 47% 48% 2 No 51% 5...
AI summary The document presents survey results about participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs and their influence on decisions to install heating equipment. It includes data on participation rates and opinions regarding the impact of prior program involvement on installation decisions.
F4. Because of your previous participation in another Efficiency Nova Scotia program and what you learned by participating in this program, you took into account the savings on your energy bill when evaluating different heating systems for...
AI summary The text discusses a participant's consideration of energy savings from an Efficiency Nova Scotia program when evaluating heating systems for their home, referencing their prior participation in another program.
2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 53 37 14 2 Agree 57% 54% 57% 2 Disagree 43% 46% 43% 0 Base: Respondents have participated in an ENS program or service in the past
AI summary The table presents survey results showing the percentage of respondents who agree or disagree with various programs (2023, MSHP, Biomass, ETS) based on their participation in an ENS program or service. The sample sizes and response rates are also provided.
G4A. On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "Not at all satisfied" and 10 is "Completely satisfied," how satisfied were you with each of the following aspects of the Heating System Rebates program? Please indicate if any are not applicable to y...
AI summary The text asks respondents to rate their satisfaction with the Heating System Rebates program on a scale from 0 to 10, indicating their level of satisfaction or if the program is not applicable to them.
G4B. On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "Not at all satisfied" and 10 is "Completely satisfied," how satisfied were you with each of the following aspects of the Heating System Rebates program? Please indicate if any are not applicable to y...
AI summary The text asks respondents to rate their satisfaction with the Heating System Rebates program on a scale from 0 to 10, indicating their level of satisfaction or if the aspect is not applicable to them.
G4C. On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "Not at all satisfied" and 10 is "Completely satisfied," how satisfied were you with each of the following aspects of the Heating System Rebates program? Please indicate if any are not applicable to y...
AI summary The text asks respondents to rate their satisfaction with the Heating System Rebates program on a scale from 0 to 10, with options to indicate if any aspects are not applicable to them.
G4D. On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "Not at all satisfied" and 10 is "Completely satisfied," how satisfied were you with each of the following aspects of the Heating System Rebates program? Please indicate if any are not applicable to y...
AI summary The text asks respondents to rate their satisfaction with the Heating System Rebates program on a scale from 0 to 10, indicating how satisfied they were with various aspects of the program and whether any aspects are not applicable to them.
G4E. On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "Not at all satisfied" and 10 is "Completely satisfied," how satisfied were you with each of the following aspects of the Heating System Rebates program? Please indicate if any are not applicable to y...
AI summary The text asks respondents to rate their satisfaction with the Heating System Rebates program on a scale from 0 to 10, indicating their level of satisfaction or if any aspects are not applicable to them.
G4F. On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "Not at all satisfied" and 10 is "Completely satisfied," how satisfied were you with each of the following aspects of the Heating System Rebates program? Please indicate if any are not applicable to y...
AI summary The text asks respondents to rate their satisfaction with the Heating System Rebates program on a scale from 0 to 10, with options to indicate if any aspects are not applicable to them.
G4G. On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "Not at all satisfied" and 10 is "Completely satisfied," how satisfied were you with each of the following aspects of the Heating System Rebates program? Please indicate if any are not applicable to y...
AI summary The text asks respondents to rate their satisfaction with the Heating System Rebates program on a scale from 0 to 10, indicating their level of satisfaction or if the aspect is not applicable to them.
G4H. On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "Not at all satisfied" and 10 is "Completely satisfied," how satisfied were you with each of the following aspects of the Heating System Rebates program? Please indicate if any are not applicable to y...
AI summary The text asks respondents to rate their satisfaction with the Heating System Rebates program on a scale from 0 to 10, indicating their level of satisfaction or if the aspect is not applicable to them.
The instructions on how to fill out the Heating System Rebates application form were simple to understand 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 124 90 29 5 10 - Completely agree 44% 49% 31% 2 9 6% 3% 14% 1 8 16% 16% 17% 1 7 11% 11% 14% 0 6 2%...
AI summary The text discusses the clarity of instructions for the Heating System Rebates application form, supported by a table showing responses from different groups with varying levels of agreement.
G6. What, if any, difficulties did you have with your Heating System Rebates application? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 124 90 29 5 None 67% 64% 72% 4 Website user-friendliness/functionality issues 11% 13% 7% 0 Confusing application/Ha...
AI summary The text discusses difficulties encountered with Heating System Rebates applications, highlighting issues such as website functionality, confusing application processes, excessive paperwork, and slow processing. It also references Efficiency Nova Scotia's Home Energy Assessment Program and its outreach and eligibility for federal funding.
H3. Did you ever consider participating in the Home Energy Assessment Program instead of Heating System Rebates to get a rebate for your [INSERT EQUIPMENT] purchase? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 104 81 23 - Yes, had considered this 27...
AI summary The text presents survey data on whether respondents considered the Home Energy Assessment Program as an alternative to Heating System Rebates for rebates on equipment purchases. The data shows varying levels of consideration across different groups.
H4. What factors helped you decide to take part in the Heating System Rebates Program instead of the Home Energy Assessment Program? Anything else? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 28 17 11 - Costs/Cost of assessment 21% 6% 45% - Shorter...
AI summary The text presents survey data on factors influencing participation in the Heating System Rebates Program over the Home Energy Assessment Program. Key factors include cost considerations, shorter wait times, and simplicity of the rebate program. A significant portion of respondents selected 'Other' as a reason, indicating diverse motivations not captured by the listed options.
I1. Now thinking exclusively about the Heating System Rebates program, do you have any recommendations for improving the program? Anything else? 2023 MSHP Biomass ETS Sample Size 124 90 29 5 English 90% 94% 86% 2 French 4% 3% 7% 0 Other 5%...
AI summary The Heating System Rebates program's performance is analyzed through demographic and language data from 2023, MSHP, Biomass, and ETS. The data includes sample sizes, language distribution, and gender distribution, providing insights into program reach and participation.
C. Program Familiarity and Promotion - C1. How familiar are you with Efficiency Nova Scotia's Heating System Rebates Program? Are you [READ RESPONSES IN ORDER] ? - 1. Very familiar - 2. Somewhat familiar - 3. Not very familiar - 4. Not at...
AI summary The section asks respondents about their familiarity with Efficiency Nova Scotia's Heating System Rebates Program and Home Efficiency Assessment (HEA) Program, and how their company promotes these programs. It also inquires about the differences between the two programs.
D. HEA/Greener Homes
AI summary This section of the document focuses on the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) and the Greener Homes initiative, which are part of Nova Scotia's efforts to improve residential energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
[DO NOT ASK SECTION D IF CONTRACTOR TYPE = ETS ALONE] - D1. If a homeowner is interested in installing a mini-split heat pump (MSHP) and is contacting you to find out about available incentives for their purchase, which programs would you...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions aimed at understanding customer awareness and preferences regarding incentive programs for installing mini-split heat pumps, specifically Heating System Rebates and Greener Homes. It explores customer understanding, program selection criteria, and common practices among advisors.
E. Satisfaction I would now like to discuss your satisfaction with the Heating System Rebates program. E1. On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "not at all satisfied" and 10 is "completely satisfied", how satisfied are you with each of the fo...
AI summary The text discusses customer satisfaction with the Heating System Rebates program, asking respondents to rate their satisfaction on a scale from 0 to 10 and to provide reasons if their rating is 7 or lower.
J. ETS - J1. [ASK IF CONTRACTOR TYPE = HP ALONE] Have you ever heard of Electric thermal storage, or ETS? [IF NECESSARY: ETS is an electric home heating device containing ceramic bricks that can help lower heating costs by storing heat whe...
AI summary This section of the document asks respondents about their familiarity with Electric Thermal Storage (ETS), whether they sell ETS, and the motivations and barriers for customers purchasing ETS. It explores factors such as cost, time-of-day rates, rebates, and alternative heating systems.
B. Efficiency and Price of MSHPs Efficiency Nova Scotia's Heating System Rebates program provides incentives to high-performance cold climate MSHPs; that is multi-zone MSHPs that have a HSPF (high seasonal performance factor) of over 10 or...
AI summary The document discusses the Heating System Rebates program by Efficiency Nova Scotia, which provides incentives for high-performing cold climate MSHPs. It outlines eligibility criteria for these MSHPs and asks about the availability, contractor participation, and price trends of MSHPs since 2019.
D. [ASK SECTION IF TIME] Heating Systems Rebates vs. Greener Homes - D1. How familiar are you with Efficiency Nova Scotia's Heating Systems Rebates Program? - 1. VERY FAMILIAR - 2. SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR - 3. NOT FAMILIAR - D2. How familiar are...
AI summary This section asks respondents about their familiarity with Efficiency Nova Scotia's Heating Systems Rebates Program and the federal Canada Greener Homes Grant program, and if familiar, to identify the main differences between the two programs.
Table 1: 2023 MHEEP Corrected Tracked Savings Program Component Results Value Tracked by EOne Corrected Tracked Value Relative Difference Value Unit Value Unit Value MHEEP (Excluding Appliance Replacements) Gross Energy Savings at the Gene...
AI summary Table 1 presents the 2023 MHEEP Corrected Tracked Savings, showing energy and peak demand savings from the program. The data indicates minimal changes in energy savings but a slight decrease in peak demand savings, attributed to adjustments for drain water heat recovery measures.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the 2023 demand-side management (DSM) results of the New Residential program administered by EfficiencyOne (EOne). This program is comprised of one component, New Home Construction (NHC). NHC encourag...
AI summary This report outlines the 2023 demand-side management (DSM) results for the New Residential program, administered by EfficiencyOne (EOne). The program, which includes the New Home Construction (NHC) component, aims to encourage energy efficiency in new homes through recommendations and financial incentives.
Table 1: Summary of 2023 New Residential Program Evaluation Program Component Evaluation Type Methodology Impact Process Market NHC Condensed › Tracking sheet audit › Use of the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) results from 2020 › Calculations us...
AI summary The document provides a summary of the 2023 New Residential Program Evaluation, focusing on the NHC program component. It outlines the evaluation methodology, including tracking sheet audits, the use of the net-to-gross ratio from 2020, and avoided greenhouse gas emission calculations.
Table 5: 2023 NHC Incentive Structure Home Type Tier Rebate Target Single-family 1 $2,000 40% better than code Detached Homes 2 $5,000 65% better than code 3 $7,000 + $2,000 75% better than code Net Zero Ready, Net Zero, or Passive House c...
AI summary Table 5 outlines the 2023 New Home Construction (NHC) Incentive Structure, which provides rebates based on home type and energy efficiency improvements. Higher tiers offer larger rebates for homes that meet or exceed specific efficiency targets, including Net Zero Ready, Net Zero, or Passive House certification.
1.3 Participation History The evolution of NHC participation levels as well as that of gross energy and peak demand savings from 2012 to 2023 is presented i[n Figure](#page-105-2) 2 an[d Figure](#page-106-0) 3 below, respectively. A total...
AI summary The document discusses the participation history of the New Home Construction (NHC) program from 2012 to 2023, showing a reduction in completed homes in 2023 compared to 2022. It also highlights the number of homes that did not meet the minimum rebate requirements and notes that savings are still claimed for these homes due to energy performance improvements.
Table 7: 2023 NHC Overestimation Ratio Values Scenario OR To-code Model – With Neither Heat Pump nor Wood/Pellet Stove 9% As-built Model – With Heat Pump 0% As-built Model – Without Heat Pump 19%
AI summary Table 7 presents the 2023 NHC overestimation ratio values for different scenarios, including models with and without heat pumps, showing varying levels of overestimation.
Non-electrical Heating System Used as Backup For NHC, the baseline heating system modelled in the to-code simulation corresponds to 100% electrical baseboards. The total as-built modelled energy consumption level is subtracted from this ba...
AI summary For new home construction (NHC), the baseline heating system modelled assumes 100% electrical baseboards. Non-electrical backup heating systems are not considered in energy savings calculations, even if they are present, to ensure conservative estimates. Only 2% of 2023 participant homes had such systems installed.
3.3.2 Spillover (Market Effects) Spillover occurs when participants decide to implement energy efficiency measures in new construction projects without participating in a program component. For NHC, this is measured in the form of market e...
AI summary Spillover in energy efficiency programs occurs when participants implement measures without program involvement. The spillover level is calculated using a formula involving new construction houses, energy efficiency percentages, and other factors. The 2022 spillover level of 14% was used for the 2023 evaluation due to unavailable 2023 data.
CONCLUSION [Table](#page-116-1) 16 summarizes the participation level as well as the gross and net savings for the New Residential program that is comprised of one component: New Home Construction (NHC).
AI summary The conclusion section summarizes the participation level and the gross and net savings for the New Residential program, which includes the New Home Construction component.
Table 16: Overall 2023 New Residential Participation and Savings Participation Level Gross Savings Net Savings Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit NHC Energy Savings 816 Participants 5.868 GWh 0.90 5.281 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 180....
AI summary Table 16 presents the 2023 participation and savings data for new residential programs, showing energy savings, peak demand savings, and GHG emission reductions. The program exceeded its energy and peak demand savings targets by 68% and 80%, respectively.
NEW RESIDENTIAL PROGRAM Appendix Report 2023 DSM EVALUATION March 11, 2024
AI summary The document is an appendix report from the 2023 Demand-Side Management (DSM) evaluation, dated March 11, 2024. It appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding related to the New Residential Program, likely focusing on energy efficiency and program performance.
1.1 BER Description BER provides financial incentives in the form of prescriptive rebates or financing to business, non-profit, and institutional (BNI) participants to foster reductions in electricity consumption and peak demand. All busin...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program provides financial incentives to BNI participants in Nova Scotia to reduce electricity consumption and peak demand. The program offers prescriptive rebates and financing, with two services: Application Rebates and Instant Rebates. Specific criteria must be met for eligibility, and rebate amounts were increased in 2022 and 2023 to boost participation. The program aims to achieve significant energy and demand savings by 2023.
Table 3: 2023 Instant Rebates Corrected Tracked Savings - Pumping Program Component Results Value Tracked by EOne Corrected Tracked Value Value Unit Value Unit Value Instant Rebates - Pumping Gross Energy Savings – at the Generator 0.367 G...
AI summary Table 3 presents corrected tracked savings for the 2023 Instant Rebates Pumping program. Both gross and net energy and peak demand savings at the generator are nearly identical, with minimal changes after correction.
Retrofit - Technical and financial support to help organizations conduct scoping and feasibility studies - Technical and financial support for the implementation of energy efficiency projects using a customized and flexible approach\ - •Or...
AI summary The Retrofit program provides technical and financial support for energy efficiency projects, targeting organizations with annual electricity consumption of 350,000 kWh or higher, provided that projects have not yet started.
2 Custom Evaluation Approach The 2023 Custom evaluation comprised a comprehensive impact evaluation for Retrofit, Building Optimization, and New Construction. For Building Optimization, given its smaller contribution to Custom savings, NTG...
AI summary The 2023 Custom evaluation focused on assessing the impact of Retrofit, Building Optimization, and New Construction programs. It aimed to calculate energy savings, develop a method for solar PV projects, and gather participant perspectives and motivations. The evaluation used NTGR results for Building Optimization and outlined research questions, methods, and sample sizes.
[Table](#page-16-2) 10 summarizes the impact evaluation approach for each project category under Retrofit. Results for the three project categories are presented below and are then combined as the aggregated results for Retrofit in Subsect...
AI summary Table 10 outlines the impact evaluation approach for Retrofit project categories. It excludes partial savings projects and presents results for three categories, which are later combined into aggregated results for Retrofit in Subsections 4.2.7 and 4.3.4.
Table 39: Overall 2023 Custom Incentives Participation and Evaluated Savings Participation Level Gross Gross Savings Net Savings Value Unit Value Unit Value Unit Value
AI summary Table 39 presents data on the participation levels and evaluated savings from custom incentives in 2023, including gross and net savings across different categories. The table provides a structured overview of the impact of these incentives.
A. Respondent Involvement in the Program A1. To begin, please tell me about your roles as a Business Development Manager as it relates to the Retrofit and SEM program services?
AI summary The section asks the respondent to describe their role as a Business Development Manager in relation to the Retrofit and SEM program services.
B. Participant Recruiting - B1. How do you typically describe the value or benefits or Retrofit to potential participants? - B2. I understand that you are involved in recommending participants that would benefit from an OEM. How are OEMs s...
AI summary The section outlines a series of questions related to participant recruiting in energy efficiency programs. It focuses on how benefits of various programs like Retrofit, OEM, SEM, and BER are communicated to potential participants, the selection of OEMs, and how different programs are differentiated and recommended to participants.
E. Challenges and Opportunities - E1. Overall, what is the main strength of the Retrofit program? - E2. What is the main challenge of the Retrofit program? - E3. What feedback have you heard from participants about the Retrofit program? An...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions posed to stakeholders regarding the Retrofit and SEM programs, focusing on their strengths, challenges, participant feedback, and opportunities for improvement. The discussion includes participant experience, consultant availability, and program delivery.
A. Identifying Key Decision-makers [Retrofit / Solar] - A1. We would like to speak with someone that played a key role in the financial decision to implement the [solar PV / energy efficiency] project for your organization. Are you that pe...
AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding seeks to identify key decision-makers involved in implementing solar PV or energy efficiency projects. It asks respondents whether they were directly involved in the financial decision-making process or, if not, to provide information about someone who was.
B. Awareness, and Participation [Retrofit] - B1. How did you first hear about the Custom Retrofit program? - 96. Specify: - B2. Why did your organization decide to implement the [solar PV / energy efficiency] project? [DO NOT READ] - 96. S...
AI summary The document section focuses on awareness and participation in the Custom Retrofit program, asking respondents how they learned about the program and their reasons for implementing solar PV or energy efficiency projects. It includes pre-coded answer options for reasons such as lower operation costs, energy policy, environmental reasons, and competitor influence.
- 1. Yes - 2. No - 98. Don't know - 99. Refused - C10. [IF C9 = YES] How does having an On-site Energy Manager (OEM) add value to your organization? - C11. [IF C9=YES] I would like you to rate the influence of the Onsite Energy Manager (OE...
AI summary The text presents a set of survey questions related to the value of an On-site Energy Manager (OEM) and their influence on energy efficiency decisions, specifically regarding solar PV projects and energy efficiency measures through the Custom Retrofit program.
Factor [READ AND RANDOMIZE] Responses a. [ASK IF Custom Retrofit] Identification of the measure in the project. Response 98 Don't Know Refused b. Development of the business case for the project. Response 98 Don't Know Refused c. Communica...
AI summary The text presents a series of factors related to the implementation of energy efficiency measures, with responses indicating a lack of knowledge or refusal to answer. The section also references a topic on cross-influence related to retrofits and solar projects.
[VOLUNTEERED] - 98. Don't Know - 99. Refused - D4. Before participating in the Custom Retrofit program had you seen energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by Efficiency Nova Scotia through its website, brochures, newsletters o...
AI summary This section of the proceeding includes a survey question about whether participants in the Custom Retrofit program had seen promotional materials from Efficiency Nova Scotia and whether those materials influenced their decision to implement a solar PV or energy efficiency project.
G. Suggestions for Improvements - G1. Are there any other challenges with the Custom Retrofit program or its delivery that we haven't discussed? - G2. Other than increased incentives, do you have any recommendations to improve the Custom R...
AI summary The text presents a set of questions aimed at identifying additional challenges, recommendations for improvement, and other considerations related to the Custom Retrofit program. It invites further input on the program's performance and potential enhancements.
Introduction – Online Survey Narrative Research and Econoler are currently conducting a formal evaluation of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Custom New Construction program. Your organization recently entered into an agreement in [CPA ACCEPTED...
AI summary Narrative Research and Econoler are evaluating the Efficiency Nova Scotia Custom New Construction program. The survey aims to understand the decision-making process of organizations that entered into an agreement with Efficiency Nova Scotia to design energy-efficient buildings exceeding code requirements.
1-10 SCALE WITH END POINT LABELS– RECORD NUMBER - 98. Don't Know - 99. Refused - F2. [IF E1<8] What was the main reason you were not more satisfied with the program overall? - 96. Specify: - F3. [IF E1≥8] What was the main reason you were...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to customer satisfaction with a program, including reasons for dissatisfaction or satisfaction and an assessment of EPS' performance in working with organizations.
DIRECT INSTALLATION PROGRAM Final Report
AI summary This document presents the final report on the Direct Installation Program, providing a comprehensive overview and evaluation of its implementation and outcomes.
1.1 Description SBES offers incentives and resources to Nova Scotia small businesses to encourage them to make energy efficient upgrades in their facilities. To be eligible, businesses must consume less than 350,000 kWh in electricity annu...
AI summary SBES provides energy efficiency incentives and resources to small businesses in Nova Scotia, with eligibility based on annual electricity consumption. It offers two participation paths: Audit and DIY, with increased incentive amounts and extended project completion timelines since 2020. EOne also launched a CDI pilot in 2021 for direct installation of energy-efficient products.
1.3 Participation History In 2023, SBES rebated a total of 38,797 units: 477 through the Audit path and 38,320 through the DIY path. As presented in [Figure](#page-173-2) 3 below, SBES participation included 467 projects in 2023, which rep...
AI summary In 2023, the SBES program rebated 38,797 units, with a significant decrease in participation compared to 2022. DIY path projects remained the most popular, but overall participation dropped by 27%. Energy and peak demand savings also decreased by 29% in 2023. Lighting contributed slightly less to energy savings, while HVAC contributed slightly more.
Dropped Out or Overdue Participant Interviews EOne provided the Evaluator with a list of participants who had been approved for SBES but had not completed any projects. The Evaluator prepared the interview sample by selecting participants...
AI summary EOne provided a list of SBES participants who had not completed their projects. The Evaluator interviewed 10 participants, finding that two had dropped out, while eight were still in progress. Five of the dropped-out or overdue participants were interviewed in detail, with the interview guide in Appendix IV.
3.1.1 Participants The main source of participant awareness about SBES, as shown in [Table](#page-179-3) 6, continues to be contractors, equipment vendors, or energy consultants (35%), while other key sources include prior experience with...
AI summary The primary source of awareness about the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program is contractors, equipment vendors, or energy consultants (35%), followed by prior experience with the program (20%) and the ENS website (20%). Other sources include friends or colleagues (11%), the internet (11%), and emails/newsletters (9%).
Table 6: Source of Awareness About SBES How Participants Learned about SBES 2019 2021 2023 Sample Size 50 50 46 From a contractor, equipment vendor, energy consultant 50% 24% 35% Through experience with the program component 8% 14% 20% Fro...
AI summary Table 6 shows how participants learned about the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program across 2019, 2021, and 2023. The primary sources of awareness included contractors, ENS account representatives, and colleagues, with varying percentages over time. Table 7 indicates that participants most frequently initiated discussions about SBES.
Table 7: Who Initiated the Discussion About SBES? Who Initiated Discussions About Participating in SBES 2017 2019 2021 2023 Sample Size 70 50 50 46 You/your business initiated it 47% 26% 44% 57% Your contractor initiated it 29% 32% 28% 24%...
AI summary Table 7 shows that the majority of small businesses in Nova Scotia initiated discussions about participating in the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program themselves, with a significant increase from 2017 to 2023. The primary motivation for participation was to reduce energy costs, followed by accessing rebates and becoming more energy efficient.
Table 8: Motivation to Participate in SBES Main Reason for Participating in SBES 2019 2021 2023 Sample Size 50 50 46 To reduce energy costs 60% 32% 35% To receive rebates 4% 10% 24% To upgrade measures/be more efficient - 22% 20% Already p...
AI summary Table 8 outlines the motivations of participants in the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program from 2019 to 2023. The primary motivation shifted from reducing energy costs to receiving rebates and upgrading measures for efficiency. A significant portion of DIY participants were unaware of the audit option or did not find it necessary for their projects.
3.1.3 Contractor Perspectives Contractors regard SBES as an important resource for helping small business clients save money on energy efficiency projects and a sales tool for engaging with small business clients. All nine interviewed cont...
AI summary Contractors view SBES as a valuable tool for helping small businesses save on energy efficiency projects and generating business. Most contractors discuss EOne programs during initial sales interactions, while some use media and websites. Clients rarely initiate discussions about SBES, though many participate once informed.
Table 9: Barriers to Participation in SBES 20 17 20 19 20 21 20 23 Barriers to Measure Implementation Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Financial challenges, even after rebate, such as lack of funds, takin...
AI summary Table 9 presents data on barriers to participation in the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program, highlighting financial challenges, time constraints, and lack of knowledge or support as key issues. The data shows varying levels of concern across different years and sample sizes.
3.2.3 Contractor Perspectives As presented in [Figure](#page-183-1) 6 below, contractors did not consider competing projects or high demand for construction services to be a barrier preventing them from completing more energy efficiency pr...
AI summary Contractors involved in the SBES program did not view competing projects or high demand for construction services as major barriers to completing energy efficiency projects. They also noted that supply chain delays and limited qualified tradespeople slightly impacted project timelines but not client participation. Up-front costs and the SBES application timeframe were identified as significant barriers to small businesses completing energy efficiency projects.
Table 10: Satisfaction with SBES Overall Overall Satisfaction with SBES 2017 2019 2021 2023 Sample Size 70 50 50 46 Mean 8.8 9.2 9.1 8.8 Don't know/refused excluded from calculations Table 11: Satisfaction with Aspects of SBES 20 17 20 19...
AI summary Table 10 and Table 11 provide data on customer satisfaction with the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program across different years, highlighting sample sizes, mean satisfaction scores, and feedback on various aspects of the program such as audit reports, financing, contractor quality, and rebate processes.
Table 19: Evaluated 2023 SBES Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings – All Paths Program Path Audit DIY CDI Pilot Total Energy Savings Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.492 7.852 0.222 8.567 Line Loss Factor 1.069 1.071 1.093 - Gro...
AI summary Table 19 presents the evaluated 2023 SBES (Small Business Energy Solutions) gross energy and peak demand savings across different program paths, including Audit, DIY, and CDI Pilot, providing data on energy savings, line loss factors, effective useful life, and peak demand savings.
CONCLUSION [Table](#page-5-0) 25 summarizes the participation level, net-to-gross ratios (NTGRs), evaluated gross and net savings at the generator, annual GHG emission reductions, as well effective useful life (EUL) values for Direct Insta...
AI summary Table 25 summarizes participation levels, net-to-gross ratios, evaluated gross and net savings, annual GHG emission reductions, and effective useful life values for Direct Installation.
A. Role & Responsibilities A1. Please tell me about your role as a [ business development manager / On site energy manger ] working with small businesses and facilities.
AI summary The document begins with a question about the role of a business development manager or on-site energy manager working with small businesses and facilities.
B. Participant Recruiting (BDM) - B1. Please describe how you identify and engage potential new participants for the SBES program. - B2. How do you typically describe the value or benefits of SBES to potential participants? [ASK FOR MAIN B...
AI summary The section outlines questions aimed at understanding how the SBES program identifies and engages new participants, the value proposition presented to them, and the themes that attract potential participants.
0-10 SCALE WITH END POINT LABELS– RECORD NUMBER - 98. Don't Know - 99. Refused - D7. [ASK IF TOTAL LIGHTING QTY>1] If there was no program rebate or financing, what is the likelihood that you would have installed exactly the same number of...
AI summary The text presents a scale question regarding the likelihood of installing the same number of lighting products without a program rebate or financing, indicating a focus on customer behavior and program effectiveness.
- 99. Refused D9. I would like you to rate the influence of the following factors in your decision to install the energyefficient lighting upgrades. Use a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "No influence" and 10 is "Great influence". The first f...
AI summary The text presents a survey question asking respondents to rate the influence of various factors on their decision to install energy-efficient lighting upgrades, using a scale from 0 to 10. The factors include program rebates, on-bill financing, and information provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia or contractors. The survey includes options for 'Don't Know' and 'Refused'.
0-10 SCALE WITH END POINT LABELS– RECORD NUMBER - 98. Don't Know - 99. Refused - D15. [ASK IF [D12](#page-22-2) OR [D13](#page-23-1) ≥5] If there was no program rebate or financing, what is the likelihood that you would have postponed inst...
AI summary The text presents a 0-10 scale for respondents to rate the influence of various factors on their decision to install high-efficiency heat pumps, with specific questions about program rebates, financing, and likelihood of postponing installation.
Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Response a. [IF TOTAL ENS REBATE>0] The program rebate Response98 Don't Know 99 Refused b. [IF FINANCING =YES] The program on-bill financing Response98 Don't Know 99 Refused c. Information or advice provided by...
AI summary The text presents a table with factors related to a program rebate, on-bill financing, and contractor information, with responses indicating 'Don't Know' or 'Refused.' The table appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding, likely related to energy efficiency programs.
READ AND ROTATE [(E1](#page-24-1) + [E2](#page-24-2) TO [E4)](#page-24-3) AND [(E5](#page-25-0) + [E6](#page-25-1) TO [E8)](#page-25-2) SEQUENCES - E1. Before participating in the Small Business Energy Solutions program in 2023 , had your...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to participation in the Small Business Energy Solutions program and previous engagement with Efficiency Nova Scotia programs and promotional materials. It explores the influence of past participation and promotional efforts on business decisions regarding energy efficiency upgrades.
G. Barriers - G1. To what extent do you consider the following as barriers preventing your business from installing other energy efficiency upgrades? Use a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means 'not at all a barrier' and 10 means 'a major barrie...
AI summary The text presents a survey question asking respondents to rate various barriers to installing energy efficiency upgrades on a scale from 0 to 10. The barriers include financial challenges, time constraints, concerns about rebate availability, need for information or technical support, and the availability of qualified contractors.
B1. How did you learn about Efficiency Nova Scotia's Small Business Energy Solutions Program? 2023 2021 Sample Size 46 50 From a contractor 24% - From a contractor, equipment vendor, energy consultant - 24% Through experience with the prog...
AI summary The table shows how participants learned about Efficiency Nova Scotia's Small Business Energy Solutions Program in 2023 and 2021, with the most common sources being contractors, experience with the program, and the ENS website.
Base : DIY respondents who would not likely have paid or financed the full cost of the lighting upgrades in absence of SBES D9A. I would like you to rate the influence of the following factors in your decision to install the energyefficien...
AI summary The text discusses DIY respondents who may not have been able to afford energy-efficient lighting upgrades without the support of the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program. It also asks respondents to rate the influence of various factors on their decision to install these upgrades.
D10/D11. Had your business already decided to install heat pumps BEFORE learning about the Small Business Energy Solutions Program? Just to confirm: before you learned about the Small Business Energy Solutions Program and the rebates and f...
AI summary The question seeks confirmation whether the business had already decided to install heat pumps prior to learning about the Small Business Energy Solutions Program and its associated rebates and financing options.
2023 2021 Sample Size 20 8 Yes 20% 13% No 65% 88% Don't know 10% 0% Refused 5% 0% Base: DIY respondents who installed HVAC upgrades
AI summary A table shows survey results from 2021 and 2023 regarding DIY respondents who installed HVAC upgrades. The sample size increased from 8 to 20, with a notable rise in 'Yes' responses (from 13% to 20%) and a decrease in 'No' responses (from 88% to 65%).
D14. If there was no program rebate or financing, what is the likelihood that you would have installed exactly the same high-efficiency heat pump that were rebated or financed through the Program? 2023 2021 Sample Size 20 8 MEAN 1.6 4.6 Me...
AI summary The question asks about the likelihood of installing the same high-efficiency heat pump without program rebate or financing. The data shows a mean response of 1.6 in 2023 and 4.6 in 2021, indicating a lower likelihood in 2023 compared to 2021.
D15. If there was no program rebate or financing, what is the likelihood that you would have postponed installing the heat pumps by at least one year? 2023 2021 Sample Size 7 4 MEAN 4.6 6.5 Mean excludes responses of 'Don't know' and 'Refu...
AI summary The question asks about the likelihood of postponing heat pump installation without program rebates or financing. The table shows mean responses for 2023 and 2021, indicating a decrease in the likelihood of postponement over time.
Base: Respondents who would not likely have paid or financed the full cost of the heat pumps in absence of SBES D16A.I would like you to rate the influence of the following factors in your decision to install the highefficiency heat pumps....
AI summary The document discusses factors influencing the decision to install high-efficiency heat pumps, focusing on respondents who likely would not have been able to afford or finance the full cost without the SBES program.
E1. Before participating in the Small Business Energy Solutions program in 2023, had your business at any time in the past participated in any Efficiency Nova Scotia programs? 2023 2021 Sample Size 46 50 Yes 41% 38% No 46% 60% Don't know 1...
AI summary The document presents survey data on participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs prior to joining the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program in 2023. It compares responses from 2023 and 2021, showing a slight increase in participation and a decrease in uncertainty. Additionally, it examines how previous ENS program participation influenced decisions to install energy-efficient upgrades.
Financial challenge, even after rebate, such as lack of funds, taking too long to recoup the investment, and so on. 2023 Sample Size 46 MEAN 6.0 Mean excludes responses of 'Not applicable', 'Don't know/Don't recall' and 'Refused'.
AI summary The text highlights a financial challenge faced by participants, even after receiving rebates, including issues such as lack of funds and difficulty in recouping investments. The data from 2023 shows a sample size of 46 with a mean of 6.0.
G1C. Concern that rebates are not available or that upgrades won't work as well as advertised 2023 Sample Size 46 MEAN 4.9 Mean excludes responses of 'Not applicable', 'Don't know/Don't recall' and 'Refused'.
AI summary This section discusses concerns about the availability of rebates and the effectiveness of energy upgrades, based on a 2023 survey with a sample size of 46 and a mean score of 4.9, excluding certain responses.
G1E. Availability of qualified contractors to complete upgrade or renovation projects 2023 Sample Size 46 MEAN 5.0 Mean excludes responses of 'Not applicable', 'Don't know/Don't recall' and 'Refused'.
AI summary The document presents a statistical summary regarding the availability of qualified contractors for upgrade or renovation projects in 2023, based on a sample size of 46, with a mean score of 5.0.
H1. What is your job title or role? 2023 2021 Sample Size 46 50 President/CEO/Owner 48% 38% Manager 15% 18% Other financial/administrative position 15% 12% Director 4% 8% Other facilities management/maintenance position 4% - Facilities Man...
AI summary This section provides statistical data on the roles, facility types, employment sizes, ownership, and business structures of participants in the Small Business Energy Solutions Program in 2023 and 2021. It highlights trends in job titles, facility activities, and business independence.
[ASK ALL] Let's step back and go through your experience with the program. - D1. How did you learn about Efficiency Nova Scotia's Small Business Energy Solutions Program? INTERVIEWER: DO NOT READ [MULTIPLE RESPONSE] - 1. From a contractor,...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to Efficiency Nova Scotia's Small Business Energy Solutions Program, focusing on how participants learned about the program, their experiences with contractors, and their satisfaction with program processes.
Upgrades Describe the upgrade in detail How many did you install? For Insulation ask: How many SQ FT of insulation did you install? Lighting – how many lamps and was the wattage difference between old and new lights? [OPEN-ENDED] [NUMERIC]...
AI summary The text outlines a table for reporting energy upgrades, including details on the type of upgrade, description, and quantity installed. It also includes a question about the influence of the Small Business Energy Solutions program on decisions to install upgrades without incentives.
APPENDIX V SBES: Contractor Interview Guide
AI summary This document provides an interview guide for contractors participating in the Small Business Energy Solutions Program (SBES). It outlines the structure and content of interviews to ensure consistency and thoroughness in contractor engagement.
Introduction Hello, may I speak with [Contact name]? My name is and I am calling from Narrative Research, a market research firm. Efficiency Nova Scotia has mandated the evaluation of its Small Business Energy Solutions Program and they in...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia has mandated an evaluation of its Small Business Energy Solutions Program. The evaluation involves contacting contractors who have worked with businesses participating in the program to gather their perspectives.
A. Awareness and Motivations for Participating - A1. What is your primary motivation for helping your customers participate in the Efficiency Nova Scotia Small Business Energy Solutions program? - A2. How, if at all, do you promote the pro...
AI summary This section of the proceeding explores the motivations and awareness of participants in the Efficiency Nova Scotia Small Business Energy Solutions program, including how the program is promoted, client inquiries, and circumstances under which it may not be recommended.
APPENDIX VII SBES: Sampling Methodology and Protocol for Desk Reviews and Site Visits
AI summary This document outlines the sampling methodology and protocol for desk reviews and site visits under the Small Business Energy Solutions Program (SBES). It provides a structured approach to evaluating program implementation and effectiveness.
Table 1: FR – Audit Path C3. If your business had not received the free audit of your facility by a certified energy auditor, would you have identified the opportunity for the energy efficient upgrades that you installed? IF 1. Yes: EMPTY...
AI summary The table explores whether businesses that did not receive a free energy audit would have identified opportunities for energy-efficient upgrades. The response options include 'Yes' with no input required or 'No/DK/REF' with 0% as the value.
Table 2: Overall 2023 Demand Response Participation and Evaluated Results Participation Level Evaluated Results Value Unit Value Unit Residential DR New DR Capacity 63 Controllers 0.023 MW Total DR Capacity 159 Controllers 0.058 MW BNI DR...
AI summary Table 2 shows the 2023 Demand Response (DR) participation and results. Residential DR exceeded its target, while BNI DR fell short. The overall program did not meet its goal of 3.000 MW of new and total available DR capacity, with BNI DR being the largest contributor to total DR capacity.
2 Residential DR Evaluation Approach The 2023 Residential DR evaluation comprised a condensed impact evaluation. The main objective of the 2023 Residential DR evaluation was as follows: › Calculate residential DR results, namely new and to...
AI summary The 2023 Residential DR evaluation focused on calculating new and total available DR capacity. Key research questions were identified to achieve this objective, with methods outlined in Table 5. The evaluation was a condensed impact assessment.
Table 10: Comparison of 2023 Residential DR Tracked and Evaluated New and Total Available DR Capacities at the Generator Available DR Capacity Realization Value Unit Rate Value New Available DR Capacity Tracked Available DR Capacity by EOn...
AI summary Table 10 compares the evaluated and tracked available demand response (DR) capacities for residential programs in 2023. Evaluated capacities were 15% to 21% lower than tracked values, attributed to updated unitary available DR capacity values.
Table 18: Overall 2023 Demand Response Participation and Evaluated Results Participation Level Evaluated Results Value Unit Value Unit Residential DR New DR Capacity 63 Controllers 0.023 MW Total DR Capacity 159 Controllers MW BNI DR New D...
AI summary Table 18 presents the 2023 demand response participation levels and evaluated results, showing the number of controllers and participants in residential and BNI DR programs, along with the associated capacity in MW.
Table 1: 2023 Residential DR Corrected Tracked Available New and Total DR Capacity Program Component Result Value Tracked by EOne Corrected Tracked Value Relative Difference Value Unit Value Unit Value Residential DR Available New DR Capac...
AI summary The table shows discrepancies in tracked and corrected values for residential demand response (DR) capacity in 2023. EOne tracked lower new DR capacity but higher total DR capacity compared to corrected values, attributed to differences in controller types included in the calculations.
Table 116: ENERGY STAR Certified Pool Pump Measure Summary 127 Table 117: Unitary Savings Values of ENERGY STAR Certified Pool Pumps 128 Table 118: Three-element Water Heater Measure Summary 129 Table 119: Domestic Water Heater Timer Measu...
AI summary The document contains a series of tables summarizing various energy efficiency measures, including ENERGY STAR certified pool pumps, LED lamps, linear LED fixtures, occupancy sensors, and water heater controls. These tables provide detailed information on savings values, baseline wattages, and in-service rates for different energy efficiency programs.
2023 Evaluation Edition Change Type Section Description Date Removal Clothes Dryer Replacement (ARet) No longer offered. 2024-03-12 Update 2.4.3 (2) Refrigerator Replacement and (3) Freezer Replacement Measures are now listed under HomeWar...
AI summary The 2023 Evaluation Edition details several changes to energy efficiency programs, including the removal of certain measures and updates to others. Notable changes include the removal of the Clothes Dryer Replacement and Booster Pump programs, and updates to refrigerator and water heater measures, as well as changes to air sealing product listings.
Table 2: Included Measures Program Components Residential Lighting EPI LED Lamps Instant Savings LED Fixtures Instant Savings Dimmer Switches Instant Savings Motion Sensors Instant Savings LED Nightlights EPI Water Heating Solar Domestic H...
AI summary This table outlines various program components offered under different initiatives in Nova Scotia, including residential lighting, water heating, space heating, appliances, and energy efficiency measures. Each component is associated with specific programs such as Instant Savings, Green Heat, and EPI, highlighting the range of energy efficiency and conservation efforts being implemented.
Table 3: Interactive Effects Factors for Residential Lighting Products Installed Indoors Type of Home Homes3 Energy Interactive Effects Factor4 Peak Demand Interactive Effects Factor5 Heat Pump Heating and Air Conditioning 14% -58% / 2.2 +...
AI summary Table 3 presents interactive effects factors for residential lighting products installed indoors, showing varying impacts on energy use and peak demand across different home types, with weighted averages indicating overall effects.
Table 4: Proportion of Lighting Products Used Indoors Type of Product Program Component % Indoor Source A-type LED Lamps 7 97% 2021 EPI Tracking Sheet Reflector and Decorative LED Lamps 8 (Except PAR38) EPI 100% 2021 EPI Evaluation (on-sit...
AI summary Table 4 provides data on the proportion of various lighting products used indoors, including LED lamps, fixtures, and motion sensors. The data comes from various sources such as tracking sheets, evaluations, and studies, with some percentages based on assumptions.
Table 5: Overall Interactive Effects Factors for Residential Lighting Measures Measure Type of Home Interactive Effects Factors Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Heat Pump Heating and Air Conditioning -20.0% x 97% = -19.4% -90% x 97% = -8...
AI summary Table 5 presents the overall interactive effects factors for residential lighting measures, including energy savings and peak demand savings across different home types and heating/cooling configurations. The table includes various lighting technologies such as LED lamps, reflector lamps, and motion sensors, showing their impact on energy and peak demand savings.
Table 9: Electrical Unitary Savings Values for LED Lamps Unitary Energy Type of LED Savings Value (kWh/year) Peak Demand-to energy Ratio (W/kWh) Unitary Peak Demand Savings Value (W/year) EPI 9 W Replacing 25 W 15.8 0.162 2.56 Type of LED...
AI summary Table 9 presents electrical unitary savings values for various LED lamps, including energy savings in kWh/year and peak demand savings in W/year. The table includes different types of LED lamps and their corresponding savings when replacing traditional bulbs.
(2) Solar Domestic Hot Water
AI summary The section titled 'Solar Domestic Hot Water' introduces a topic related to the use of solar energy for domestic hot water systems. It does not contain specific details or arguments at this point in the document.
Summary [Table](#page-174-1) 30 presents a summary of the values used to calculate solar domestic hot water (solar DHW) savings. The detailed methodology follows.
AI summary Table 30 summarizes the values used to calculate solar domestic hot water (solar DHW) savings. The detailed methodology for these calculations is provided in the following sections.
Table 30: Solar Domestic Hot Water Measure Summary Parameter Green Heat Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Solar domestic hot water heating for water heating from renewable energy N/A Additional Notes - Ge...
AI summary Table 30 summarizes the Solar Domestic Hot Water Measure, including its description, installation rate, useful life, and energy savings parameters. The table highlights that the measure has a 100% installation rate, a 20-year useful life, and no unitary energy savings as it is calculated using RETScreen.
(4) Low-flow Showerheads
AI summary This section discusses the topic of low-flow showerheads, though no detailed analysis or arguments are provided in the given text.
Table 40: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Thermostatic Shower Valves Parameter Symbol Value for Single- family Homes Value for Apartments Source Flow Rate [gpm] q Variable (1.5 gpm for low-flow showerheads, otherwise: 2.0 gpm,...
AI summary Table 40 presents electrical unitary energy savings values for thermostatic shower valves, including parameters like flow rate, number of people per household, average number of showers, and behavioural waste time. These values are based on data from EPI tracking sheets and other studies.
Installation Rates [Table](#page-192-0) 47 lists the installation rate for EPI hot water tank wraps.
AI summary Table 47 provides the installation rate for EPI hot water tank wraps, which is part of the discussion on energy efficiency programs and customer-related initiatives.
(1) Mini-split Heat Pumps
AI summary The section discusses mini-split heat pumps, which are a type of heating and cooling system. These systems are relevant in the context of energy efficiency and residential programs.
Table 63: Air Sealing Product Measure Summary Parameter E PI Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Air seal ir sealing products to reduce space heating consumption Electrica al resis tance heate d homes Heat...
AI summary Table 63 provides a summary of air sealing product measures, including installation rates, energy savings parameters, and other relevant data. It outlines the performance of various heating systems, such as electric resistance and heat pump systems, and includes details on energy savings and peak demand savings.
Table 67: Electrical Unitary Savings Calculations for Window Film Kits Parameter Symbol Value for Electrical Resistance Heated Homes Value for Heat Pump Heated Homes Source Number of windows insulated nwindow 2 Perimeter of insulated windo...
AI summary Table 67 presents electrical unitary savings calculations for window film kits, comparing electric resistance heated homes and heat pump heated homes. Key parameters include window dimensions, heating degree days in Connecticut and Nova Scotia, and the coefficient of performance for mini-split heat pumps.
Table 69: Electrical Unitary Savings Calculations for Programmable Thermostats Parameters Symbol Single- family Duplex/Triplex/ Townhouse Apartment Source Proportion of Each Dwelling Type Dwelling Proportion 69% 11% 20% Statistics Canada 2...
AI summary Table 69 presents electrical unitary savings calculations for programmable thermostats across different dwelling types. It includes gross energy savings, unitary savings for electronic thermostats, and temperature setback savings. The 221 kWh value is specifically used for the MHEEP program, as most participants are in single-family homes.
Table 71: Billing Analysis Savings Results for Smart Thermostats for Electrical Heating Systems Jurisdiction Measure Sample Size Heating Consumption Savings Oregon98 Nest thermostats 185 12% (for ASHPs) Bonneville Power Administration99 Ne...
AI summary Table 71 presents billing analysis savings results for smart thermostats used with electrical heating systems in Oregon and by the Bonneville Power Administration. The data shows a 12% savings for air-source heat pumps (ASHPs). The savings are calculated based on the assumption that each dwelling has one heating system per room or floor.
Table 78: Refrigerator Retirement/Replacement Measure Summary Parameter ARet HomeWarming / MHEEP Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Retirement of old refrigerators to reduce electricity consumption Additio...
AI summary Table 78 summarizes the Refrigerator Retirement/Replacement Measure, detailing parameters such as electricity consumption reduction, installation rates, and energy savings. The table highlights savings for different refrigerator sizes and provides values for unitary energy savings and peak demand savings.
endment-13/18419)[announcements/amendment-13/18419](https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy-efficiency/energy-efficiency-regulations/regulatory-announcements/amendment-13/18419) (Last accessed October 1, 2020) 117 Based on the tracking sheet provid...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary energy savings for refrigerators replaced through the HomeWarming and MHEEP programs. It uses data from the 2022 tracking sheet and EnerGuide ratings to estimate energy consumption based on the age and efficiency of replaced and newly installed refrigerators.
Table 114: Heavy-duty Outdoor Timer Measure Summary Parameter Instant Savings Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Heavy-duty outdoor timers to reduce electricity consumption N/A Additional Notes - General P...
AI summary The table provides a summary of the Heavy-duty Outdoor Timer Measure under the Instant Savings program. It outlines parameters such as installation rate, useful life, and energy savings, with references to specific subsections for detailed calculations.
(1) Three-element Water Heaters
AI summary The document section titled '(1) Three-element Water Heaters' introduces a topic related to water heater technology, though no detailed discussion or arguments are provided in the text.
Table 163: Faucet Aerator Measure Summary Parameter SBES Reference Measure Description and Ide Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Faucet aerators to reduce hot water consumption N/A Additional Notes Bathroom General...
AI summary Table 163 provides a summary of the Faucet Aerator Measure, including details on installation rates, effective useful life, and energy savings parameters. The measure aims to reduce hot water consumption in bathrooms through the installation of faucet aerators.
Table 183: EUL Values for Residential LED Lamps and Fixtures Measure Program Component Average Rated Lifetime (hours) Annual HOU (hours/year) Equipment Life (years) 2023 Equivalent EUL (years) LED General-use and Decorative Lamps LED Decor...
AI summary Table 183 presents Equivalent Useful Life (EUL) values for various residential LED lamps and fixtures, including different wattage replacements and their corresponding program components, average rated lifetimes, annual hours of use, and equipment life in years.
Table 185: EUL Values and Sources for Non-LED Lighting Residential Measures Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source ENERGY STAR Certified Dehumidifiers Instant Savings 12 ENERGY STAR Calculator, 2016 (Value for dehumidifiers) ENERG...
AI summary Table 185 provides Equivalent Useful Life (EUL) values and sources for non-LED lighting residential measures under the Instant Savings program component. The table lists various energy-efficient appliances with their respective EUL values and references to sources such as ENERGY STAR Calculator, DOE Building Energy Data Book, and DEER reports.
Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source Space Heating Mini-split Heat Pumps Green Heat, HEA, AMH 18 GDS, 2007 (Table 1 – Residential Measures, value for AC/heat pumps) Central Air-source Heat Pumps Green Heat, HEA 18 GDS, 2007 (Tab...
AI summary The document outlines various energy efficiency measures with their respective Energy Use Life (EUL) values, including heat pumps, air sealing products, and thermostats. These measures are part of programs such as Green Heat and EPI, with EUL values sourced from different organizations and studies.