HomeResource CostsM12696Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Resource Costs" in M12696

Matter: NSP Maritime Link Inc. (NSPML) - Application to Review the Holdback Mechanism
6 passages 4 documents

Resource Costs across all matters →

N-2NSPML (BW) RIRs 1-22 - Redacted 3 passages
Preamble p. pp. 1-8
- 12 Facility, Cat Arm Station, Hinds Lake Station, Granite Canal Station, Upper Salmon Station, and Paradise - 13 River Station) for a near-term analysis, resulting in a DAFOR of 2.50%, while a ten-year, capacity- - 14 weighted average wa...

AI summary The text discusses the use of DAFOR (Derated Adjusted Forced Outage Rate) values for near-term and long-term resource planning by Hydro. It references the Holyrood TGS sensitivity assumptions and mentions annual filings related to system reliability and resource adequacy, including the '2024 Resource Plan' and the '2025 Near-Term Report'.

Quarterly Report on Asset Performance in Support of Resource Adequacy for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2025 p. p. 1
Quarterly Report on Asset Performance in Support of Resource Adequacy for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2025 - ensure alignment with the assumptions used in the resource planning model (PLEXOS) 12 1 while - 2 appropriately reporting...

AI summary The report discusses the methodology for calculating forced outage rates for various generating units, including the use of historical data and scenario-based approaches, and outlines the planned retirement of certain units by 2030. It also mentions the impact of the Labrador Island Transmission Link (LIL) commissioning on future forced outage rate assumptions.

6.0 Thermal Unit DAFOR Performance p. p. 7
6.0 Thermal Unit DAFOR Performance - 7 Detailed results for the current and previous periods are presented in Table 7 and Chart 3. These results - 8 are compared to Hydro's near-term and resource planning analysis values for forced outage...

AI summary This section discusses the DAFOR (Derated Adjusted Forced Outage Rate) performance of thermal units, comparing current and previous period results to Hydro's near-term and resource planning analysis values used in the 2024 Resource Plan and the November 2025 Near-Term Report. Units exceeding established values are addressed.

N-5NSPML (NSEB) RIRs 1-19 - Redacted 1 passage
Preamble p. p. 4
2 "Quarterly Report on Asset Performance in Support of Resource Adequacy for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2025", February 5, 2026, Filed with the Newfoundland & Labrador Board of Commissioners of Public Utilities.

AI summary A quarterly report on asset performance, submitted to the Newfoundland & Labrador Board of Commissioners of Public Utilities, supports resource adequacy for the twelve months ending December 31, 2025.

N-8Evidence - CA 1 passage
EXPERT TESTIMONY p. p. 10
from Maritime Link transmission project. Regional joint dispatch. Accounting issues related to coal supplies and wind farm tax credits. Impact of demand response and time-varying rates on fuel costs. Nova Scotia UARB Matter No. M11009, dir...

AI summary The text discusses Nova Scotia UARB matters (M11009, M11017) on Maritime Link benefits, capital expenditure plans, and Kentucky PSC Case No. 2022-00402 regarding fossil fuel unit retirements. Topics include transmission planning, demand response impacts on fuel costs, capital expenditures, and renewable energy integration.

101315Bates White (NSPML) IR 1 to 22 - PDF 1 passage
Section 17 p. p. 8
ssessment and supporting evidence. - d) If the LIL were to consistently operate at 900 MW as designed, would the Witness's view of the achievability of the 12-month requirement change? Please explain. - Request IR-22: Please refer to Exhib...

AI summary The text includes two questions: one about the impact of LIL operating at 900 MW on meeting a 12-month requirement, and another requesting analysis of Muskrat Falls asset value to customers. It also references Exhibit N-1 and Request IR-22 for specific details.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →