Topic:"Revenue Requirement" in M09096

7 8 While DSM investment is one factor among many that impact NS Power's costs and 9 rates, DSM investment is the only expenditure by NS Power that directly allows 10 customers reduce their power bills. DSM is an investment – not a cost. F...

AI summary The document emphasizes the benefits of DSM investment, stating that for every dollar invested, customers receive $4.80 in lifetime benefits. The Preferred Plan is expected to deliver $622.7 million in customer benefits, reduce energy production by 6,000 GWh, and lower average participant bills by up to 11 percent. The plan requires NS Power to increase DSM funding from 2.6% to 3% of total annual revenue.

Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity were provided by NS Power, from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2018. & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expres...

AI summary Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM were provided by NS Power, along with avoided costs of transmission and distribution from 2018. The text describes metrics like TRC and PAC, which are benefit/cost ratios, and highlights EfficiencyOne's planned participation by low-income customers.

Table 13: 2020-2022 New Residential Performance Indicators Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Program Administrator Cost Test...

AI summary Table 13 presents performance indicators for new residential energy efficiency programs from 2020 to 2022, including investment, energy savings, participation, and cost metrics. It highlights trends in energy savings, investment, and cost efficiency over the three-year period.

14 3.7.1 NO-DSM SCENARIO RATES 15 The model uses a set of forecast rates without DSM, on top of which calculated DSM 16 impacts are added. The last year for which actual (i.e. with-DSM) rates are known is 17 2019. An approximate Program Co...

AI summary The analysis models no-DSM rates by subtracting 2019 program costs from actual rates, escalating them annually by 2.7%, and using them to calculate class revenue and average energy rates. This forms the baseline for comparing DSM impacts.

29 • Further exploring NS Power's proposed means of allocating lost revenues and 30 avoided costs to rate classes; 1 • Discussing which avoided cost estimates to use when avoided cost estimates 2 change (EfficiencyOne indicated its intende...

AI summary The text discusses NS Power's proposed allocation of lost revenues and avoided costs to rate classes, focusing on the use of avoided cost estimates and historical data in the Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) model. EfficiencyOne has provided its approach and expects to collaborate with stakeholders for the next RBIA filing.

This graph shows annual program participation for the class, as a percentage of total customers in the class. Each customer is counted once for each year that they participate in any program. # Rate a nd Bill I mpacts o f DSM or the Sm all...

AI summary The graph illustrates annual program participation for the small industrial rate class, showing incremental and cumulative DSM savings, DSM costs, and average savings per participant over time. Participation and savings increase from 2020 to 2022 before plateauing, with costs and savings per participant also noted.

Page 13 of 16 Rate a nd Bill I mpacts of of DSM or า the Lar ge Indus trial Clas s - ALTE RNATE F PLAN Impacts of DSM on the Large Industrial Rate Class 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2...

AI summary This table presents the impacts of the Large Industrial Class Demand-Side Management (DSM) Plan from 2011 to 2035, including incremental and cumulative DSM savings, DSM costs, participant numbers, and the levelized cost of saved energy. Savings and costs are shown over time, with notable data starting in 2020.

Table 1: 2020-2022 Alternate DSM Resource Scenario Investment and Savings Year Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Weighted-Average Measure Life (years) Peak...

AI summary Table 1 outlines the investment and savings from 2020 to 2022 under an alternate DSM resource scenario. It shows increasing investments and savings in energy and peak demand, along with metrics like the Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC). The data comes from NS Power and includes avoided costs from the 2014 IRP and 2018 updates.

Table 2: Alternate DSM Resource Scenario Investment and Savings 2020 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TR...

AI summary Table 2 outlines investment and savings for alternate Demand-Side Management (DSM) resource scenarios in 2020, including residential and business programs, with details on energy savings, peak demand reductions, and cost tests. The data reflects avoided costs provided by NS Power from the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and 2018 transmission and distribution costs.

Table 3: 2021 Alternate DSM Resource Scenario Investment and Savings 2021 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Tes...

AI summary Table 3 presents the 2021 investment and savings data for alternate Demand-Side Management (DSM) resource scenarios, including program-specific investments, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and cost tests. The data is provided by Nova Scotia Power and includes information from the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and 2018 transmission and distribution avoided costs.

The figure below identifies the Contract Price to be paid by NSPI allocated for each year of the Term. 2020 2021 2022 UARB Approved Contract Price to be Paid by NSPI The Parties acknowledge that any surplus realized by EfficiencyOne in del...

AI summary The document outlines the Contract Price to be paid by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) over the Term and specifies that any surplus from EfficiencyOne meeting Performance Targets must be reported to and refunded by the UARB, unless otherwise directed.

43 45 SCHEDULE C 74 ii. Cumulative annual net peak demand savings at generator 75 iii. Lifetime Energy Savings 76 77 c) Performance Indicators (for UARB reporting) consist of: 78 i.Annual incremental energy savings (reported by program and...

AI summary The text outlines performance indicators and reporting requirements for the UARB, including energy savings, demand savings, ratepayer benefits, customer satisfaction, and low-income program participation. EfficiencyOne is responsible for submitting a historical rate and bill impact analysis annually.

5.4 Total 102.1 535.6 354.9 5192.4 103.0 2.1 5.2 Incremental Incremental Lifetime Energy Annual Net Program Investment Lifetime Benefits Annual Net Total Resource 2020 Savings at Demand Savings Administrator ($ million) ($ million)a Energy...

AI summary The text presents financial and energy data, including total investment, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and cost tests related to a program. The data includes figures for 2020 and other years, with metrics such as investment in millions, energy savings in GWh, and cost tests.

Benefits (Avoided Costs) In the societal test, the Energy Trust will include the following benefits: 1. The value of the electrical and/or gas energy saved based on the avoided cost forecasts of the utilities whose customers are served by...

AI summary The Energy Trust includes benefits such as avoided costs, non-energy benefits, line losses, and natural gas capacity benefits in its societal test. These benefits are based on forecasts from utilities and the PUC, and include a 10 percent credit for energy efficiency as required by the Northwest Power Act and OPUC Docket UM-551.

• ► ➢ ➢ ➢ ► • • 3 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 4 Page 5 of 6 • • • • • o o o o o ► ► ► 4 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 4 Page 6 of 6 ► o o ► 5 EfficiencyOne – EfficiencyOne Application for app...

AI summary This document includes a filing related to EfficiencyOne's application for approval of a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. for the period 2020-2022, identified as matter M09096 (E-ENS-R-19), along with E1's responses to NS Power.

6.2 Fo llow-up on 2017 Evaluation Report Recommendations 33 Table 29: Number of Rebated Products Sold Under Instant Savings, 2017-2018 35 Table 30: Retailer Satisfaction with Aspects of Instant Savings 40 Table 31: Retailer Satisfaction wi...

AI summary The text presents tables related to the evaluation of the Instant Savings program, focusing on rebated products sold, retailer satisfaction, unitary savings values, peak demand-to-energy ratios, and revised effective useful life values for lighting products from 2017 to 2018.

S2. What was the most important reason you were not more satisfied with the program overall? Most Important Reason Not More Satisfied 2018 with Green Heat Overall Total MSHP Heat Pump Solar/ Biomass Sample Size 10 (#) 5 (#) 2 (#) 3 (#) It...

AI summary Respondents expressed dissatisfaction with the Green Heat program, citing issues such as long wait times for rebates, small rebate amounts, poor communication, and difficulty understanding the program. These concerns were reported by participants who had an overall satisfaction score of 7 or lower.

10.1 Levelized avoided fuel costs Consistent with the Company's position provided in comments on the 2016 RBIA Report, due to the manner in which fuel costs have been incorporated, the use of levelized fuel costs from the 2014 IRP based on...

AI summary The document discusses the discrepancy between levelized fuel costs used in the 2014 IRP and actual marginal fuel costs experienced by customers. It highlights that the RBIA should reflect the recovery pattern of fuel costs, which are recovered as they are used, unlike future fixed costs. The levelized costs from the 2014 IRP are significantly higher than actual and projected marginal fuel costs.

M07730, EfficiencyOne – 2016 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (E-ENSC-R-16), NSPI letter to the UARB, November 30, 2016. 1 marginal costs for the period 2011-2020, and the 2021-2033 annual marginal cost 2 forecast from the 2014 IRP, is $74/MW...

AI summary NS Power argues that the current RBIA model used by EfficiencyOne does not accurately reflect the variability in bill and rate impacts among rate classes. They propose separating fuel cost savings from fixed cost savings or losses to improve the accuracy of the RBIA results and better reflect the differences in cost causation between rate classes.

DATE FILED: April 12, 2019 Page 33 of 37 1 1. Annual fuel costs reduced by avoided fuel cost of DSM programs should be 2 allocated to rate classes based on their shares in annual GWh requirement in each 3 year. 4 5 2. Annual fixed generati...

AI summary The text outlines proposed modifications to the allocation of DSM program benefits to rate classes based on annual GWh and MW demand shares. It also highlights that the current RBIA methodology uses a static allocation factor based on a historic year, and that E1's model does not differentiate between energy and demand-related cost responsibilities across different classes.

Q. Are the claimed benefits also based on avoided energy cost assumptions? A. Yes. The claimed customer benefits depend on the assumptions that EfficiencyOne has made. As I understand, EfficiencyOne has used high levelized fuel costs from...

AI summary The answer confirms that EfficiencyOne's claimed benefits are based on assumed avoided energy costs, which are significantly higher than actual fuel costs experienced by NS Power's customers. This discrepancy may lead to an overestimation of DSM benefits and affect the cost-effectiveness of measures considered.

RATE DESIGN Evaluated NGrid's imbalance resolution, daily scheduling procedures, and penalty exposure for PSEG-Long Island associated with gas/electric scheduling. Evaluated open access transmission tariffs in PJM, New York and New England...

AI summary The text outlines evaluations of rate design, transmission tariffs, and utility rate structures across multiple jurisdictions. Key activities include assessing NGrid's scheduling procedures, analyzing PJM and New York transmission tariffs, evaluating Noreste's distribution rates in Panama, and studying utility unbundling impacts. Additional work involves transportation rate calculations, marginal cost studies, and assessments of cogeneration and off-peak rate proposals.

Annual Avoided Fuel Costs Year Avoided Energy Cost ($/MWh) Avoided Energy Costs used in RBIA ($/MWh) Actul Margin real IND IA ($/ IVIVVII) Cost 2009 IRP 2014 IRP Current Proposed Variance ($/MW h) 2010 133.73 59 .11 2011 108.44 166.00 108....

AI summary The document presents a table detailing annual avoided fuel costs from 2010 to 2039, comparing values from different Integrated Resource Plans (IRPs) and the actual margin. The data shows a general trend of increasing avoided energy costs over time, with variations between the current and proposed values. The table also includes metrics like the Actul Margin and associated costs.

Small Business Advocate Issue ENS Position/Proposal IG Comments 2017_ENS_1.a. Avoided fuel costs Switch from levelized to annual avoided fuel costs. Agree. 2017_ENS_1.b. Marginal avoided fuel cost versus IRP avoided fuel costs The two are...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate discusses various proposals and positions related to avoided fuel costs, allocation methods, and modeling approaches. ENS proposes changes to how costs are calculated and modeled, and the IG provides feedback, agreeing with most proposals but requesting further clarification on some points.

\ \ 10 11 12 13 16 17 - 1 - \ For certainty, in accordance with the performance requirements set out in Schedule "C" attached hereto, EfficiencyOne shall be deemed to be in substantial compliance with the approved Performance Targets if 90...

AI summary The document outlines the compensation structure under a contract between NSPI and EfficiencyOne, including the net contract price to be paid by NSPI over the term of the agreement. It also details the Balance Adjustment, which refers to the return of a 2014 surplus of DSM funds. The UARB has approved the cost-allocation methodology for this adjustment, and any surplus realized by EfficiencyOne at the end of the term must be reported and refunded to NSPI.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-07: Regarding the approximate $7 million surplus remaining from the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, please provide E1's perspective on how that might best be used to benefit electricity ratepayers. Response IR-07: Efficienc...

AI summary EfficiencyOne proposes using a surplus of approximately $7 million from the 2016-2018 DSM Plan to benefit ratepayers by applying it equally across the 2020-2022 DSM Plan, citing alignment with past practice and maximum customer benefit. It also suggests investing a $15 million HST refund into the 2020-2022 DSM Plan for a higher return compared to direct refunds or early repayment of 2015 financing.

Appendix E. EERAM Economic Tests Measure, program, end‐use, building type, and overall portfolio level costs and benefits are calculated in EERAM. Some of these costs and benefits are calculated as net and others as gross. Net values take...

AI summary This section of Appendix E discusses the Economic Evaluation of Resource and Measures (EERAM) framework, which calculates costs and benefits of energy efficiency programs at various levels. It outlines four financial tests (TRC, PAC, RIM, PCT) used to evaluate program impacts, including how benefits and costs are defined and calculated, with a focus on net-to-gross adjustments and discount rates.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 2 Request IR-17: 3 Regarding the Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) for Alternate Plan included in 4 Appendix B of EfficiencyOne 2020-2022 DSM Plan Filing: 5 6 a. What is the present value of the benefits to the partic...

AI summary The document presents a request and response related to the Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) for the 2020-2022 DSM Plan by EfficiencyOne. The request includes questions about the present value of benefits, impact of the alternate plan, assumptions used in avoided cost estimation, and how future DSM measures affect the RBIA. The response provides a present value of bill savings and refers to prior responses for other questions.

Issue • How to estimate reductions in billed demand, for the purpose of calculating lost demand-based revenues?

AI summary The proceeding addresses the methodology for estimating reductions in billed demand to calculate lost demand-based revenues, a critical factor in determining financial impacts for utility services.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-32: 2 3 Please explain how "The average marginal fuel cost for the 23-year period from 2011 to 4 2033 [of] $74/MWh" is related to the "$106.93/MWh used by E1 in years 2015-2030." 5 (Appendix A page 45) 6 7 (a)...

AI summary The document requests an explanation of the discrepancy between the average marginal fuel cost of $74/MWh over 2011-2033 and the $106.93/MWh used by EfficiencyOne (E1) for 2015-2030. The response highlights the relevance of historical data to demonstrate the difference between assumed avoided energy costs and actual marginal costs, emphasizing affordability and ratepayer protection.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-7: 2 3 Please provide all analyses and workpapers of any scenarios besides the preferred plan that 4 would result in a lower total revenue requirement for NSP. 5 6 Response IR-7: 7 8 Please refer to SBA IR-8....

AI summary The document includes a request (IR-7) asking Nova Scotia Power (NSP) to provide analyses of scenarios that would lower its total revenue requirement, with the response directing to SBA IR-8. This is part of a regulatory proceeding overseen by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB).

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-8: 2 3 On page 12, NS Power stated that its overall revenue requirement is $1.4 billion annually 4 but the amount of costs over which it has control is a fraction of this amount. 5 6 (a) On a high level, pleas...

AI summary NS Power states that its overall revenue requirement is $1.4 billion annually, but it has control over only a fraction of these costs. It is requested to list the costs it controls and those it does not, with a response referring to Attachment 1.

2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan (NSUARB M09096) NSPI Responses to NSUARB Information Requests 1 Request IR-14: 2 3 E1 has proposed including Lifetime Energy Savings as an additional performance metric. 4 In section 7.0...

AI summary NS Power responds to NSUARB information requests regarding the inclusion of Lifetime Energy Savings as a performance metric and the refund of HST and DSM program surplus funds. NS Power believes the new metric would have a neutral impact but recommends deferring its inclusion for further evaluation. NS Power also requests the return of funds to benefit customers.

Document: 268936 Date Filed: April 29, 2019 Synapse (E1) Page 1 of 11 1 2 Request IR-1: programs. costs of Please describe how EfficiencyOne proposes to recover the its proposed 27 b. If the answer to Question part a) above is yes, please...

AI summary The document requests EfficiencyOne to describe how it plans to recover costs from its proposed programs, including details on which programs include specific measures, the fuels being replaced, avoided fuel consumption, incentives, eligibility requirements, and anticipated participant numbers and revenue impacts.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 a. To what extent-in both percentage and absolute values-does the incorporation of customer-related costs distort the allocation of benefits an...

AI summary The text contains several regulatory requests aimed at NS Power regarding the incorporation of customer-related costs, avoided marginal costs, and the use of levelized fuel costs in their RBIA. It also references a report by Richard Levitan on the impact of DSM on thermal generation and system reliability during peak heating seasons.

Request IR-7 Please provide all analyses and workpapers of any scenarios besides the preferred plan that would result in a lower total revenue requirement for NSP.

AI summary The request asks for analyses and workpapers of alternative scenarios that would result in lower total revenue requirements for NSP compared to their preferred plan.

Supra note 1, at para 72. 2 in the E1 Preferred Plan 12 and will provide far more system wide benefits. 3 Further, postponing transient energy-efficient measures (such as new construction, 4 or addition of new equipment) will have a long t...

AI summary The Affordable Energy Coalition (AEC) argues that delaying energy-efficient measures and not reinvesting HST refunds in efficiency programs could have long-term negative impacts. They urge the Board to approve funding for First Nations and AMFH programs at the Preferred level as agreed in the Consensus Agreement between E1 and NSPI.

14 15 16 17 Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity were provided by NS Power, from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2018. 18 19 b TRC is a benefit/co...

AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs of energy and capacity provided by NS Power from the 2014 IRP, as well as benefit/cost ratios (TRC and PAC) used to evaluate EfficiencyOne's programs, including participation by low-income customers and specific rebate programs.

Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity were provided by NS Power, from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2018. & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expres...

AI summary NS Power provided annual avoided costs of energy and capacity from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided in 2018. Lifetime benefits are calculated as the net present value of avoided costs over the program's life using utility WACC. TRC and PAC are benefit/cost ratios used to evaluate program efficiency, with PAC focusing on EfficiencyOne's costs and TRC on combined costs.

Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity were provided by NS Power, from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2018. & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expres...

AI summary The document discusses annual avoided costs of energy and capacity provided by NS Power, referencing the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and 2018 transmission and distribution costs. It explains how lifetime benefits are calculated using net present value and introduces TRC and PAC as benefit/cost ratios. It also notes the focus on low-income customer participation in EfficiencyOne programs.

1 3. 2020-2022 DSM RESOURCE PLAN 2 3 The 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan represents a comprehensive suite of programs and 4 service offerings for Nova Scotia electricity customers. The main goal of each program 5 is to help reduce electricity...

AI summary The 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan outlines a suite of programs aimed at reducing electricity costs for consumers in Nova Scotia. The plan highlights energy savings, CO2 reductions, and system benefits, with EfficiencyOne investing $110 million to achieve significant energy and demand savings.

Audited Financial Statements EfficiencyOne will retain the services of an external financial auditor to prepare audited annual financial statements. These will be filed with the NSUARB in the second quarter of the following year, no later...

AI summary EfficiencyOne will engage an external auditor to prepare audited annual financial statements, to be filed with the NSUARB by April 28, following the NSUARB's Revised Filing Dates letter dated January 9, 2018.

Table 3: 2020 Preferred DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2020 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (T...

AI summary Table 3 outlines the 2020 investment and savings from the Preferred DSM Resource Plan, detailing program-specific investments, energy savings, and cost tests. It provides data on residential and non-residential programs, including efficient product rebates, direct installation, and enabling strategies.

Table 5: 2022 Preferred DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2022 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (T...

AI summary Table 5 outlines the 2022 Preferred DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings, detailing investments, benefits, and savings across residential, business, and enabling strategies programs. The table highlights energy savings, peak demand reductions, and cost tests such as TRC and PAC.

Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity were provided by NS Power, from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2018. Total cost-effectiveness tests are calc...

AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs of energy and capacity from NS Power's 2014 IRP and 2018 transmission and distribution costs. It also outlines cost-effectiveness tests, including TRC and PAC ratios, and explains metrics like levelized and nominal costs of saved energy.

Audited Financial Statements EfficiencyOne will retain the services of an external financial auditor to prepare audited annual financial statements. These will be filed with the NSUARB in the second quarter of the following year, no later...

AI summary EfficiencyOne will retain an external financial auditor to prepare audited annual financial statements, which will be filed with the NSUARB by April 28, following the Revised Filing Dates letter from January 9, 2018.

- 3. Subject to adjustment for First Nation and Low Income funding (for both the investment and energy savings), the remainder of the 2020-2022 DSM Plan shall be delivered in accordance with the Alternate scenario filed by E1 in E1's Appli...

AI summary The 2020-2022 DSM Plan will be delivered under the Alternate scenario, with adjustments for First Nation and Low Income funding. E1 withdraws its request for a new performance target and agrees to refer it to DSMAG. Parties support expensing DSM funding through FAM at the next General Rate Application, with NS Power supporting this approach without additional regulatory burden.

26 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 3 EfficiencyOne developed the 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource 4 Plan (DSM Resource Plan) to acquire cost-effective energy efficiency and system 5 coincidence peak demand reduction resources that provi...

AI summary EfficiencyOne has developed the 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, proposing an investment of $110 million to achieve energy and system-peak demand savings, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and support the energy efficiency industry in Nova Scotia. The plan builds on the success of past programs and highlights the benefits of DSM initiatives over the past decade.

Table 3: 2020 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2020 Investment (S million) Lifetime Benefits (S million) First-Year Energy Spyings (GWb) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Penk Demand Savings (MIY) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) b Progr...

AI summary Table 3 outlines the 2020 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, covering various programs such as efficient product rebates, residential and business initiatives, and enabling strategies. It details investments, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and cost tests associated with each program.

Table 5: 2022 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2022 Investment (S million) Lifetime Beachts (S million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWb) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) h Program...

AI summary Table 5 outlines the 2022 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, highlighting a $4.4 million investment in the Low Income Participation program, resulting in 8.0 GWb of first-year energy savings and 86.4 GWh of lifetime energy savings, along with 1,2 MW of peak demand savings.

13 8,4 Audited Financial Statements 14 15 EfficiencyOne will retain the services of an extetnal financial auditor to prepare 16 audited annual financial statements. These will be filed with the NSUARB in the 17 second quatter of the follow...

AI summary EfficiencyOne will prepare audited annual financial statements, filed with the NSUARB by April 28 in the second quarter of the following year, adhering to the NSUARB's Revised Filing Dates letter from January 9, 2018.