Topic:"Revenue Requirement" in M12282

!(= 'ÿ) ÿ,! &$'ÿ%+)=0'ÿ ÿ&'' %%'ÿ)!ÿ&ÿ(=/=0&$#-ÿ &%#%ÿ$)ÿ'$ /#!ÿ)- &00ÿ ()%$A""($#-!%%;ÿ M;ÿN0($ÿ&ÿ()!%#%$!$ÿ&!'ÿ 0#& 0ÿ/ $+)'ÿ") ÿ&00)(&$#!,ÿ1 ), &/ÿ()%$%;ÿN)/ ÿ !"#$%ÿ&!'ÿ ()%$%ÿ/&>ÿ ÿ'# ($0>ÿ&00)(& 0;ÿO) ÿP&/10.ÿ(&1&(#$>ÿ/& Q$ÿ % -&$#)!...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency and cost recovery mechanisms, referencing specific programs and regulatory frameworks. It outlines the role of energy efficiency initiatives, cost recovery, and the evaluation of programs such as DSM plans and energy efficiency resource standards.

mÿiFGÿMQRJRHQJNÿQRHGREQXGÿDFIPNYÿZGÿQRHNPYGYÿQRÿEFGÿjfdÿEGDEÿJDÿJÿPEQNQE[ÿD[DEG^ÿHIDEAÿiFGÿ FIDEÿHPDEI^GLÿQ^KJHEDÿDFIPNYÿQRHNPYGÿIRN[ÿEFGÿKILEQIRÿIMÿEFGÿ^GJDPLGÿHIDEÿKJQYÿZ[ÿEFGÿFIDEÿHPDEI^GLAÿ %(oÿ456ÿ1#2q028 +#ÿ, +# -).#/ÿ rI^GÿPEQNQEQGD...

AI summary This text discusses the analysis and evaluation of various energy programs and regulatory considerations, including cost recovery mechanisms, program effectiveness, and the impact of regulatory decisions on energy efficiency and affordability. It references specific programs and regulatory processes.

(a) Summary Table – Canadian Cost Effectiveness Testing Province Primary Test Additional Tests Used Non-Energy Benefits Ontario • In accordance with the IESO's Cost-Effectiveness Guide, the IESO only implements Conservation and Demand Mana...

AI summary The summary table outlines cost-effectiveness testing practices in Ontario for conservation and demand management programs. It highlights the use of the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test and Levelized Unit Energy Cost (LUEC) as primary metrics, along with the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test for internal reporting. Non-energy benefits are now evaluated on a sector level, replacing a 15% benefit adder.

What recommendations do you have? - Based on the above considerations, I provide the following conclusions and recommendations for the Board: - 1) The current primary TRC test is limited in its ability to singularly inform the Board about...

AI summary The text outlines recommendations for the Board regarding the use of benefit-cost analysis (BCA) tests in evaluating demand-side management (DSM) activities. It suggests using the PAC test as the primary energy efficiency test, incorporating the E1 BCA test for broader considerations, and rejecting the E1 Proposed BCA test as the primary test. It also emphasizes the need for cost-effective measures and proper consideration of avoided utility costs and GHG emissions.

ustrial energy users. For Industrial Gas Users Association of Manitoba (2020 - present): Support for cost of service and rate design matters. Testimony before the Manitoba Public Utilities Board. For Northwest Territories Power Corporation...

AI summary Bowman Economic Consulting Inc. provides regulatory support to industrial and utility organizations across Canada, focusing on rate design, revenue requirements, cost of service, and system planning. Engagements include testimony before regulatory bodies, technical analysis for rate applications, and project development assistance.

Utility Proceeding Work Performed Before Client Year Oral Testimony NTPC 2012/14 General Rate Application Analysis, Preparation of Company Evidence & Expert Testimony on all areas of Revenue Reqt, COS and Rate Design, incl Depreciation NWT...

AI summary The table outlines various utility proceedings involving analysis and expert testimony on revenue requirements, cost of service, and rate design, including depreciation, with entities such as NTPC, Manitoba Hydro, and Newfoundland Hydro, and regulatory bodies like NWTPUB, MPUB, and NLPUB.

EXPERT TESTIMONY FORUM ON BEHALF OF MATTERS Massachusetts Public Utility Commission Blackstone Gas Company ("Blackstone") DPU 14-92 and DPU 17-122, in support of Blackstone's long term gas supply contracts. DPU 18-15, Investigation by the...

AI summary The text presents expert testimony from various regulatory bodies and organizations, including the Massachusetts Public Utility Commission and the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), related to matters such as gas supply contracts, tax rate impacts on utility rates, and rate case analyses. These proceedings involve legal and regulatory considerations for energy companies.

ustrial energy users. For Industrial Gas Users Association of Manitoba (2020 - present): Support for cost of service and rate design matters. Testimony before the Manitoba Public Utilities Board. For Northwest Territories Power Corporation...

AI summary Bowman Economic Consulting Inc. provides regulatory support to industrial and energy organizations on cost-of-service, rate design, revenue requirements, and technical analysis. Services include testimony before regulatory bodies, evidence preparation, and expert guidance on depreciation, return on investment, and system planning.

Sample Projects: For the Office of the Utilities Consumer Advocate of Alberta (2016 - 2024): Analysis and strategic support of Government agency representing the interests of small utility customers. Addressed matters of utility rates and...

AI summary The text details a range of regulatory and utility-related projects across Alberta, Ontario, British Columbia, Manitoba, and other jurisdictions. It covers rate design, asset depreciation, utility regulation, and energy policy, with involvement from multiple regulatory bodies and organizations.

Utility Proceeding Work Performed Before Client Year Oral Testimony NTPC Required Firm Capacity/System Planning hearing Analysis, Preparation of Company Evidence and Expert Testimony NWTPUB NTPC 2004 Yes Nunavut Power (Qulliq Energy) 2004...

AI summary The table outlines various regulatory proceedings involving utilities and their associated work performed, including analysis, preparation of evidence, and expert testimony. These proceedings span multiple years and involve different regulatory bodies across Canada.

2025 M12282 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by EfficiencyOne for approval of a New Benefit- Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating Demand Side Management Plans RESPONSES TO IN...

AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks approval for a new benefit-cost analysis test for evaluating demand side management plans. Synapse Energy Economics requests information on how energy efficiency measures impact utility revenues, differences in treating electrification measures, and jurisdictional practices regarding BCA tests and the PAC test.

Board should only ever look at the portfolio level (which appears to be contrary to the definition of Demand Side Management under s.79A(b) of the Act, which includes activities, programs, and plans). To be clear, Mr. Bowman's proposal is...

AI summary The text argues that the Board should assess electrification at the portfolio level, conflicting with DSM definitions under the Act. Mr. Bowman proposes including electrification revenues as benefits, contrasting with energy efficiency programs that avoid NSP fuel costs. The ACEEE database is referenced, noting states include lost revenues in BCA tests.

STRATEGIC ELECTRIFICATION With respect to the recently added definition of strategic electrification in section 79A(b)(iv) of the Public Utilities Act , Ms. Thompson confirmed that strategic electrification requires both a reduction in ove...

AI summary The definition of strategic electrification under the Public Utilities Act requires reducing both greenhouse gas emissions and electricity costs. Ms. Thompson notes E1 has not advanced work on demonstrating cost reductions. Mr. Bowman argues the PAC test must include revenue benefits for electrification to pass, emphasizing that avoiding peak demand increases makes the test mathematically feasible.

APPENDIX A Category PAC (Program Administrator Cost) Current TRC (Total Resource Cost) NS Power Recommendatio ns E1's Proposed BCA (Nova Scotia Jurisdictional Test) Host Customer Benefits �Excluded �Excluded �Excluded ��Included (via proxy...

AI summary The table compares different approaches to evaluating demand-side management (DSM) programs, focusing on categories like Host Customer Benefits, Screening Level, Threshold Ratio, Affordability Considerations, Rate & Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA), Ratepayer Cost Impact, and Revenue Requirement. It highlights differences between NS Power's recommendations and E1's proposed BCA (Nova Scotia Jurisdictional Test).