Home›Right Of Way›M12104›Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Right Of Way" in M12104

Matter: Riverport Electric Light Commission Complaint - Power Poles - Martin and Wendy Tanner
5 passages 4 documents

Right Of Way across all matters →

T-5TANNER (NSEB) RIR-1 (Redacted) 1 passage
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien In response to your request for information please...

AI summary Martin Tanner is concerned about the proximity of a primary distribution line to his property's veranda, which is less than the required 3 meters clearance. He criticizes the utility company for not addressing the issue properly and mentions a lack of on-site measurements and accountability.

99194Board Decision Letter - Redacted 1 passage
BACKGROUND
to increase horizontal clearance. The Strum June Report concludes that the clearance measurements all comply with industry standards except for the one horizontal clearance of the front steps/landing. The Strum June Report refers to photos...

AI summary The Strum June Report indicates that most horizontal clearance measurements comply with industry standards, except for the front steps/landing, which has been non-compliant since 1920. Modifications to the property since 1960 are cited as the cause, though the existing 7.2kV overhead line's location has not changed. The utility has improved clearance to more than two and a half times the original measurement, but the issue remains.

97628NSEB (UTILITY) IR-1 to IR-7 (redacted) 2 passages
Request IR-3:
Request IR-3: Does the Utility have any electrical easement drawings related to the residence showing that the poles are installed within its easement boundaries? - a) If yes, please submit the drawing and confirm the location of the pole...

AI summary The request asks the Utility if it has electrical easement drawings showing that poles are installed within the easement boundaries near a residence and seeks clarification on how pole locations were determined if no such drawings exist.

Request IR-8:
Request IR-8: - On page 3 of the complaint (Exhibits-T-1), in its email response to the complainants, the Utility - states the following: - "…I was instructed to make you aware that any actions RELC may take to fix the situation with power...

AI summary The document contains a request (IR-8) asking the Utility to clarify ownership of electric poles and the agreements in place for work performed on them, including by third parties such as Eastlink. The request also seeks an explanation of how electrical work is conducted on poles if the Utility does not own them.

99194Board Decision Letter - Redacted 1 passage
BACKGROUND
to increase horizontal clearance. The Strum June Report concludes that the clearance measurements all comply with industry standards except for the one horizontal clearance of the front steps/landing. The Strum June Report refers to photos...

AI summary The Strum June Report indicates that most horizontal clearance measurements comply with industry standards, except for the front steps/landing, which has been non-compliant since 1920 due to property modifications. The utility has improved clearance, but it remains non-compliant.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →