Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Stakeholder Engagement" in M08888

Matter: E-ENS-G-18 - EfficiencyOne - Evaluation of DSM Programs - Application to allow inclusion of Non-Energy BenefitsEfficiencyOne - Application for approval of the use of Non-Energy Benefits within Cost-Effectiveness Testing
33 passages 10 documents

Stakeholder Engagement across all matters →

E-1Application 1 passage
Challenges in a Preliminary Assessment p. pp. 65-66
Challenges in a Preliminary Assessment - ENS's Affordable Multifamily Housing Pilot has an "open" measure-list (i.e. custom measure approach) - Very few measures have been installed to-date due to challenges in gaining additional participa...

AI summary ENS's Affordable Multifamily Housing Pilot faces low participation due to an open measure-list and barriers to engagement. The Low-Income Advisory Group collaborates with ENS to address these challenges. Few measures have been installed to date.

E-6E1 (NSPI) RIR-1 to RIR-43 3 passages
The Vermont Case Study p. p. 2
The Vermont Case Study Three elements contributed to the incorporation of cost-effectiveness screening in Vermont: the quantity and nature of available research regarding NEBs, a growing number of other jurisdictions incorporating NEBs int...

AI summary Vermont integrated Non-Energy Benefits (NEBs) into cost-effectiveness screening due to research, stakeholder collaboration, and jurisdictional trends. Since 2000, Vermont operated a statewide efficiency program. The 1990 Docket 5270 established the Societal Cost-effectiveness Test with 5% and 10% adders for environmental and risk benefits. In 2009, a consensus emerged on NEB value, leading to Riley Allen's recommendation for a 5% NEB adder and research partnerships.

4.2 General Requirements: p. p. 80
4.2 General Requirements: - Single-vendor, fixed price agreement to perform scope of work and produce project deliverables. - Willingness to work with the Research Team throughout the project duration to identify measures and/or benefit ty...

AI summary The section outlines general requirements for a procurement process, including a single-vendor fixed-price agreement, collaboration with a research team, and agreements with EfficiencyOne. It also mandates in-person presentations of findings in Halifax, Nova Scotia.

4.5 Deliverables p. pp. 80-83
4.5 Deliverables Project deliverables must include: - 1. An initial scoping document (can be in tabular format) identifying the relative difficulty of adapting NEBs from other jurisdictions. This document will be reviewed by EfficiencyOne,...

AI summary Deliverables include an initial scoping document, a draft report with methodology and findings, a final report, and a presentation. Focus areas are adapting Non-Energy Benefits (NEBs) and Total Resource Cost (TRC) test results, involving EfficiencyOne, the Research Team, and the Proponent. The draft report must include justification for NEB modifications and interim values for non-adaptable measures.

E-10-(i)Book of Authorities 22 passages
IN THE MATTER OF THE EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION ACT p. p. 3
IN THE MATTER OF THE EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION ACT - and- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION for Approval of its Electricity Demand Side Management Plan for 2012 BEFORE: Peter W. Gurnham, a.c., C...

AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation sought approval for its 2012 Electricity Demand Side Management Plan. The NSUARB heard applications from multiple stakeholders, including Nova Scotia Power Inc., municipalities, and environmental groups. The board approved the application and directed future filings. Key participants included legal counsel, consultants, and regulatory bodies.

Preamble p. pp. 3-368
s - 7. Proposed integrated multi-fuel approach to program administration - 8. Proposed consideration of a multi-year performance-based model - 9. Future role of Program Development Working Group - [6] The following parties were Intervenors...

AI summary The document outlines proposed approaches for program administration, including a multi-fuel strategy and multi-year performance-based models, and highlights the involvement of various intervenors, their representatives, and witnesses in the proceeding. Key parties include the Consumer Advocate, Nova Scotia Power Inc., and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, among others.

[91 ] The SVS made the following recommendation: p. p. 3
[91 ] The SVS made the following recommendation: Recommendation 11: The DSM Administrator should consider whether or not it may be useful to revisit approaches to assessing free-ridership. Currently, NMR is using an improved variant of the...

AI summary The SVS recommends revisiting free-ridership assessment methods, noting NMR's current approach may overstate free-ridership. EAC suggests using netto-gross (NTG) ratios at the measure level, while ENSC agrees to refine evaluations through stakeholder consultation. The Province supports ongoing refinements, and ENSC commits to incorporating feedback on free-ridership and spillover assessments.

5.6 Multi Year Performance Based Model ("PBM") p. p. 3
5.6 Multi Year Performance Based Model ("PBM") [127] ENSC seeks Board approval to engage stakeholders to assess the use of a Performance Based Model ("PBM") for future submissions to the Board. ENSC stated that: Under such a multi-year, pe...

AI summary ENSC requests approval to assess a Multi-Year Performance Based Model (PBM) for future submissions, shifting oversight from preapproving annual DSM plans to evaluating overall investments and savings targets. The current framework uses TRC tests for individual measures, whereas PBM emphasizes post-approval performance validation.

[128] The Dunsky report noted that: p. p. 3
[128] The Dunsky report noted that: The move to a performance-based model would provide ENSC with increased flexibility to adjust and adapt its plans as needed, as situations arise and as feedback comes in. Furthermore, an oversight model...

AI summary The Dunsky report supports ENSC's shift to a performance-based model (PBM) for DSM programs, citing flexibility and reduced regulatory burden. The Province and EAC endorse PBM discussions, while Board Counsel questions the need for Board approval for stakeholder consultation. ENSC seeks Board approval to explore PBM implementation, emphasizing cost recovery and program flexibility.

5.6.1 Findings p. p. 3
5.6.1 Findings [134] ENSC suggests exploration of a PBM with stakeholders for future approval by the Board. The Board noted its concerns during the hearing and ENSC elaborated on the issue in its closing submission. [135] Based on this, th...

AI summary ENSC proposes exploring a PBM with stakeholders for future Board approval. The Board initially expressed concerns but, after ENSC's closing submission, has no objection to stakeholder discussions on PBM.

6.0 ROLE OF PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP p. p. 3
6.0 ROLE OF PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP [136] On March 5, 2008, NSPI and most of the Intervenors in the 2009 DSM proceeding signed a Settlement Agreement ("SA") and filed that agreement with the Board as part of an amended DSM Plan....

AI summary The Program Development Working Group (PDWG) was established under a 2008 Settlement Agreement to assist with program design and implementation, including performance measures for the new administrator, ENSC. The Board approved its continuation until ENSC became fully functional in late 2010, ensuring continuity during the transition. The PDWG included NSPI, Board staff, Conserve Nova Scotia, and stakeholders, with the goal of developing transparent processes and reporting to the UARB.

[138] In its Application, ENSC stated: p. p. 3
[138] In its Application, ENSC stated: The Program Development Working Group (PDWG), established during NSPl's tenure as interim DSM Administrator, has advised ENSC during the transition from NSPI to ENSC and during the preparation of the...

AI summary ENSC proposes continuing the Program Development Working Group (PDWG) in 2011, citing its value as a stakeholder forum. They committed to stakeholder consultation, with UARB's support. Intervenors did not oppose the proposal, and ENSC emphasized expert and stakeholder backing for the process.

6.1 Findings p. p. 3
6.1 Findings [140] The Board recognizes the valuable contributions made by the PDWG while NSPI served as the interim DSM Administrator and also during the transition process from NSPI to ENSC as the new DSM Administrator. The Board accepts...

AI summary The NSUARB acknowledges PDWG's contributions during NSPI's interim DSM administration and the transition to ENSC. The Board accepts ENSC's proposal to retain PDWG's role while engaging broader stakeholders for potential changes, requiring ENSC to file results in its 2013 DSM Plan.

9.0 SUMMARY OF BOARD FINDINGS p. p. 3
9.0 SUMMARY OF BOARD FINDINGS [153] The Board accepts the 2010 DSM Plan evaluation and verification, with the qualification made in the SVS for a 10% reduction for the Efficient Products-Direct Install program. [154] The Board understands...

AI summary The Board accepts the 2010 DSM Plan evaluation, approves the 2012 DSM investment, and sets conditions for ENSC, including data system improvements, quarterly progress reviews, and policy development. It also approves changes to the TRC test and requires studies on free ridership and spillover effects.

2.0 BACKGROUND p. p. 60
- [22] The Consensus Agreement addressed a number of issues, which were identified in the Board's Final Issues List in this proceeding, and which the Board discusses below. - [23] In a number of previous decisions relating to electricity m...

AI summary The Consensus Agreement addresses issues from the Board's Final Issues List. The Board emphasizes settlement agreements' importance in electricity matters, supported by all customer classes, ensuring public interest. The process involves extensive pre-hearing evidence and stakeholder involvement.

3.5.8 Program Cost Allocation p. p. 91
3.5.8 Program Cost Allocation [106] In approving the Consensus Agreement the Board has approved Section 4 on the cost allocation.

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board (Board) approved Section 4 of the Consensus Agreement, which outlines the cost allocation methodology for the program. This approval is part of the regulatory proceeding related to program cost allocation.

3.7.1 Findings p. pp. 92-93
3.7.1 Findings [114] The Board is satisfied that the provisions of the Consensus Agreement adequately address the ability of E1 to make mid-course adjustments and allow sufficient flexibility at the program level. Limiting the 25% adjustme...

AI summary The Board approves the Consensus Agreement's provisions allowing E1 to make 25% mid-course adjustments at the program level, not sectors, to minimize customer class impacts. The Industrial Group's signatory status is noted, and the Board deems sector-level adjustments unnecessary due to E1's approach.

4.0 LETTERS OF COMMENT AND PUBLIC SPEAKERS p. pp. 96-97
4.0 LETTERS OF COMMENT AND PUBLIC SPEAKERS [129] The Board received 37 letters of comment from various persons, who wrote individually or on behalf of organizations. With only two exceptions, all were supportive of E1 and maintaining the a...

AI summary The Board received 37 letters, mostly supporting E1's DSM plan, citing environmental, economic, and low-income benefits. Public speakers emphasized maintaining DSM programs and energy efficiency culture. One letter critiqued Dr. Peach's evidence, while concerns about industry capacity if spending decreases were raised.

8) DSM Advisory Group Discussions p. p. 106
8) DSM Advisory Group Discussions a) If consensus is not achieved on any of the above items to be addressed within the DSM Advisory Group, such items will be presented to the UARB for determination.

AI summary If the DSM Advisory Group fails to reach consensus on specific items, those items will be forwarded to the UARB for final determination, highlighting the regulatory process for resolving disagreements within DSM initiatives.

Consensus Agreement p. pp. 106-112
Consensus Agreement Signed and dated this 16 th day of June 2015. Witness EfficiencyOne All Per: Witness Nova Scotia Power Incorporated Delle Per: Prin Canonium Witness Consumer Advocate Per: Witness Small Business Advocate Per: Witness In...

AI summary The document outlines a consensus agreement signed on June 16, 2015, with various stakeholders including EfficiencyOne, Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, the Consumer Advocate, the Small Business Advocate, the Industrial Group, and the Affordable Energy Coalition. The agreement includes multiple witnesses and signatories involved in the regulatory process.

a) Evidence and Submissions p. p. 131
initiatives are not addressed to specifically named customers, there is significantly less uptake, leading to less successful programs. [29] As evidence of the foregoing, E1 relies on the following: - Discussions with Canada Post, as well...

AI summary E1 argues that targeted marketing initiatives yield higher response and conversion rates compared to non-targeted approaches, citing evidence from Canada Post, internal data, and industry benchmarks. Non-targeted campaigns show lower engagement, while targeted email and mail campaigns demonstrate significantly improved participation.

Background p. p. 157
the Department's Minister approved the "blue route". But there was no official announcement until 2005, after the completion of an environmental assessment. In the meantime, public meetings continued.

AI summary The Department's Minister approved the 'blue route' project, but no official announcement occurred until 2005 following an environmental assessment. Public meetings continued during this period.

Consumer advocate p. p. 312
Consumer advocate - 91 (1) Where the Governor in Council directs or the Board on its own motion decides, the Board shall appoint a person to act as a consumer advocate in a hearing before the Board. - (2) A consumer advocate appointed purs...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB) may appoint a consumer advocate to represent residential consumers in hearings. The advocate acts as a full intervenor, with authority to negotiate settlements and access legal/technical expertise. Fees and expenses are paid by applicants, and the Governor in Council may regulate qualifications.

Small business advocate p. p. 312
Small business advocate - 92 (1) In this Section, - (a) "prescribed" means prescribed by the regulations made pursuant to subsection (7); - (b) "small business" means a business - (i) of a prescribed type, - (ii) to which prescribed rate c...

AI summary The section defines 'small business' and outlines the appointment of a small business advocate by the Board. The advocate acts as a full intervenor, with the Board's authority to set fees and expenses, including expert costs. Regulations by the Governor in Council define eligibility criteria and advocate qualifications.

Regulations p. p. 368
Regulations - 34 (1) The Governor in Council may make regulations - (a) prescribing the terms and conditions, including remuneration, for the Board engaging the services of professional persons, technical persons and experts to advise the...

AI summary Section 34 outlines the Governor in Council's authority to regulate the Board's operations, including terms for engaging experts, public notice requirements, participation rules, record-keeping, information release, and definitions. Regulations may apply generally or to specific classes of matters, with legislative supremacy over conflicting Acts. The power is governed by the Regulations Act, 1992.

> __________ p. p. 368
> __________ 1 2 3 HANSARD 09-29 DEBATES AND PROCEEDINGS Speaker: Honourable Charlie Parker 4 Published by Order of the Legislature by Hansard Reporting Services and printed by the Queen's Printer. 5 Available on INTERNET at http://nslegis...

AI summary This text discusses the introduction of Bill No. 49, the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Act, which follows recommendations from Dr. David Wheeler's report. The bill aims to establish the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and is part of a legislative process involving public consultation and stakeholder engagement.

E-13-(i)Book of Authorities 1 passage
(4) Constatation d'un conflit p. p. 125
silence strongly suggests that it is Parliament's intention to maintain the balance struck by s. 21 (see Tele-Mobile Co. v. Ontario , 2008 SCC 12, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 305, at para. 42, per Abella J.). [74] The same purposeful balancing is evid...

AI summary The text discusses Parliament's intention to maintain legal balance under s.21, referencing Tele-Mobile Co. v. Ontario (2008 SCC 12). It examines legislative history of s.31 regarding retransmission rights, including 1988 amendments expanding copyright to telecommunication. Broadcasters continue seeking legal recognition for EDR retransmissions, with references to Bill C-32 and stakeholder memoranda.

75411Notice of Hearing 1 passage
Board Hearings are open to the public and you may participate as follows:
Board Hearings are open to the public and you may participate as follows: - You may speak at the hearing. You must notify the Board by Thursday, January 3, 2019. - You may make written comments by sending a letter to the Clerk of the Board...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board outlines procedures for public participation in hearings, including speaking, submitting written comments, and requesting intervenor status by specific deadlines. Documents related to the proceeding are accessible at Board offices and online, with references to EfficiencyOne's offices and a document number provided.

76089Board Order - Adjourned without day and revised timeline 1 passage
ORDER
ORDER WHEREAS by Application dated September 19, 2018, EfficiencyOne applied to the Board for approval for the use of measure-level Non-Energy Benefits within the context of Cost-Effectiveness testing associated with future DSM planning re...

AI summary EfficiencyOne requested deferral of its application to use Non-Energy Benefits in Cost-Effectiveness testing for further consultation. The Board adjourned the hearing and established a timetable for developing an issues list, stakeholder sessions, and filing updates by December 31, 2019.

75411Notice of Hearing 1 passage
Board Hearings are open to the public and you may participate as follows:
Board Hearings are open to the public and you may participate as follows: - You may speak at the hearing. You must notify the Board by Thursday, January 3, 2019. - You may make written comments by sending a letter to the Clerk of the Board...

AI summary Public participation in a Board hearing is open, with deadlines for speaking (Jan 3, 2019), written comments (Jan 3, 2019), and intervenor requests (Oct 17, 2018). Documents are accessible via the Board's website and EfficiencyOne's offices. Document Number: 265058.

75424Notice of Intervention - SBA 1 passage
Page 2
Page 2 DATED at Bedford, Nova Scotia, this 1st day of October, 2018. E.A. Nelson Blackburn, Q.C. Small Business Advocate TO: Doreen Friis Clerk of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 3 rd Floor Summit Place 1601 Lower Water Street Hal...

AI summary A letter dated October 1, 2018, from E.A. Nelson Blackburn, Q.C., the Small Business Advocate, to Doreen Friis, Clerk of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, regarding a regulatory proceeding in Nova Scotia.

75668Multeese (NSPI) IR-1 to IR-17 1 passage
Request IR-11:
Request IR-11: - Table 1 (page 5 of 64) of the VEIC Report (Attachment 4) lists NEBs "Recommended for Inclusion in the ENS Market Rate Programs". - a) Please identify which of these E1 believes are currently accounted for by customers who...

AI summary Request IR-11 asks E1 to clarify which of the NEBs listed in the VEIC Report are currently accounted for by customers considering participation in E1's DSM programs, and whether benefits are communicated generally or as specific dollar savings estimates.

75669NSUARB (NSPI) IR-1 to IR-9 1 passage
NON-CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REQUESTS
NON-CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REQUESTS To: James Gogan EfficiencyOne Counsel The Breton Law Group [email protected] From: Board Staff Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board Responses Due: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 Copies: 1 electronic...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board has sent a non-confidential information request to James Gogan of EfficiencyOne, requesting responses by November 14, 2018. The request includes both electronic and hard copies of the information, and Steve Pronko is the contact person for the Board.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →