Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Stakeholder Engagement" in M12282

Matter: EfficiencyOne - New Benefit Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating Demand Side Management (DSM) Plans Application for Approval of New Benefit Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating Demand Side Management (DSM) Plans
80 passages 29 documents

Stakeholder Engagement across all matters →

E-1Notice of Application and Evidence 34 passages
Section 35
s provide strategic or long-term 23 benefits. 24 25 [129] Although broadly stated, the Board finds that some of the factors outlined in E1’s 26 response to E1(IG) IR-7(b) provide this justification for the inclusion of the questioned 27 me...

AI summary The Board acknowledges some strategic benefits of E1's measures but downplays arguments about TRC test limitations and non-energy impacts. It emphasizes that future applications must provide individual justifications for measures failing cost-effectiveness tests, while ongoing concerns about the test should be addressed through stakeholder processes.

Section 198
!ÿ #!!$%&ÿ '()ÿ +, -.)ÿ-/ÿ0( .ÿ1 7ÿ28ÿ38 ÿ4ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ 78 ÿ123456ÿ89ÿ:;<ÿ=>?@>ABÿCDÿ:8ÿ; :ÿK@D:8=<9DLÿ ) -a), PTÿN+.0- ),.ÿ0-ÿ- 0 i)ÿ0() ,ÿ)PSM+.).ÿVPSÿ /VN W 0 )._ÿ]^.ÿ PNW+S)ÿ]]hÿ\^hÿ\ehÿ\fhÿ N-...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation and evaluation of energy efficiency programs, focusing on topics such as demand-side management, regulatory compliance, and the impact of various initiatives on energy usage and cost recovery. It also references regulatory processes and stakeholder engagement.

Section 201
@7:@ÿ:A>ÿBC99C;=?ÿ<8>DÿE @7 ;ÿ@7>ÿ>=>B@A B @?ÿ:;DÿF:8ÿ ;D<8@A >8GÿH>?ÿ @>A98ÿ:A>ÿD>I ;>Dÿ ;ÿ:ÿJ=C88:A?ÿ:;Dÿ ;ÿA>=>K:;@ÿ8>B@ C;8ÿCIÿ@7>ÿ9:;<:=GÿLC9>ÿCIÿ@7>ÿ@>A98ÿ<8>Dÿ ;ÿ@7>ÿ 9:;<:=ÿ:A>ÿ9CA>ÿMAC:D=?ÿD>I ;>Dÿ@7:;ÿ ;ÿC@7>Aÿ:NN= B:@ C;8Oÿ:8ÿ;C...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy and utility services in Nova Scotia, focusing on topics such as cost recovery, fuel adjustment mechanisms, and stakeholder engagement. It references various regulatory processes and considerations for energy efficiency and affordability.

Section 220
BJ C@ÿÿ QBL=S@ÿB =S BRS@ÿ E>B J C@ÿD>ÿ?BQÿSDQCÿCF>DI?FÿCF=ÿC>B RIC D<ÿTBGBJ C@ÿ \B RIC D<ÿQ@QC=KÿCDÿC>B Cÿ=S=JC> J C@ÿD>ÿ ?BQÿQBL=S@ÿB =S BRS@ÿ .-5+7-!^+- ,ÿ _ QC> RIC D<ÿZ@QC=Kÿ]DQQ=Qÿ ;S=JC> J C@ÿSDQCÿCF>DI?FÿCF=ÿH QC> RIC D<ÿQ@QC=Kÿ _ Q...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency, cost recovery, and program evaluations, including the role of the Board in managing fuel costs, efficiency programs, and stakeholder engagement in regulatory processes.

Section 236
O@AA@Aÿ~€ÿKOÿR @O@CMÿQ‚‚B DQM KCAÿXN@O@ÿJVBM ‚B@ÿƒI?ÿM\‚@AÿJ ]NMÿT@ÿDKJT C@R„ÿ CDBVR C]Zÿ ÿJVBM ‚B@ÿKC‡A M@ÿƒI?ÿM\‚@A„ÿAVDNÿQAÿ]O R‡ CM@]OQM@Rÿ@ D @CMÿTV BR C]AÿˆGI~‰Šÿ ÿJVBM ‚B@ÿƒI?ÿM\‚@Aÿ CÿQÿA‚@D  Dÿ]@K]OQ‚N DÿBKDQM KCÿ CÿMN@ÿKO...

AI summary The text discusses the analysis of a regulatory proceeding related to energy efficiency programs, specifically referencing the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis (ABC) and its implications for Nova Scotia Power (NSP). It outlines various aspects of program evaluation, including performance monitoring and stakeholder engagement.

Section 281
ÿ!"#$%&'(#!%"ÿ +,-ÿ.+/0123ÿ42-.3,52-ÿ1+2ÿ06307-2ÿ/84ÿ-.702ÿ79ÿ1+,-ÿ:/86/;<ÿ=1ÿ037>,42-ÿ/8ÿ7>23>,2?ÿ79ÿ52829,[email protected]ÿ /8/;A-,-ÿBCDEFÿ/84ÿ42-.3,52-ÿ1+2ÿ973:/1ÿ79ÿ1+,-ÿ:/86/;<ÿ ÿ&GHIJGKLIMNÿOPMJQRÿ$MHSLJTMHÿUÿ%VMJVGMWÿ XYZ-ÿ/32ÿ32-763.2-ÿ;7./1...

AI summary The document discusses the impact of the XYZ program on utility cost recovery and regulatory proceedings, focusing on the role of the Building Code Division (BCD) and the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis (ABC). It outlines various regulatory considerations, including the use of fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, cost-recovery strategies, and stakeholder engagement in the regulatory process.

Section 289
'ÿ6(% '%)ÿ6(ÿ8&%(%6$#ÿ $%ÿ628$4%'ÿ1 &2ÿ9:;'ÿ4$(ÿ$#'&ÿ4&()"4%ÿ $%=ÿ06##=ÿ$()ÿ8$ %6468$%6&(ÿ $($#3'',ÿR 'ÿ$($#3''ÿ2$3ÿ0ÿ"'1"#ÿ1& ÿ6(1& 26(!ÿ)46'6&('ÿ !$ )6(!ÿ"%6#6%3ÿ6(7'%2 (%ÿ6(ÿ& ÿ'"88& %ÿ &1ÿ9:;'ÿ$()ÿ4$(ÿ0ÿ4&28#2 (%$ 3ÿ%&ÿ-./',ÿ;$%ÿ628$4%...

AI summary This text discusses the analysis of a regulatory proceeding, focusing on the impact of the 9:; mechanism on energy efficiency and cost recovery. It references various regulatory processes, including fuel-cost-adjustment and prudency reviews, and outlines the need for stakeholder engagement and compliance with energy efficiency standards.

Section 354
QOQPnKÿPndÿpPKQJLPOÿLp^PMKcÿPJQÿLnMONdQdqÿQQnÿLoÿRPJdÿK ÿ†NPnKLoahÿ {ÿ rQnQoLKcÿPndÿM cKcÿPJQÿn Kÿd N_OQwM NnKQdhÿ {ÿ rQnQoLKcÿPndÿM cKcÿPJQÿKJQPKQdÿM ncLcKQnKOaÿPMJ ccÿefgÿKa^Qchÿ D F;ÿCÿF?@!"-?uÿ‚+=,<#u#.?- #‡ÿ <.?,<#.@ÿ)+EG=#.@@-+.ÿ fcK...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings involving energy efficiency programs, fuel cost adjustments, and legal frameworks. It references legislative acts and regulatory processes, including compliance and stakeholder engagement. Key topics include energy efficiency, affordability, and regulatory oversight.

Section 358
(n$ /: ÿ & $'8ÿ6:$/ &ÿ-$ÿ39, %& ! ÿ#&/ÿ.:3& $#63 ÿ :+(! $+;ÿ oS]^pibSÿd^PR]lÿ2 /: ÿ 3 ($% %(8ÿ#&/ÿ'#+ÿ+8+( !ÿ +(+4ÿ/ . 3"ÿ3 #+(, +(ÿ & $'8ÿ$ +:$ +4ÿ%!"$. ÿ+8+( !ÿ $ 3%#6%3%(8ÿ#&/ÿ$ +%3% & 84ÿ$ /: ÿ+8+( !ÿ$%+q4ÿ"$! ( ÿ$ +:$ ÿ/%. $+%(84ÿ%& $...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy and utility matters in Nova Scotia, focusing on topics such as energy efficiency, cost recovery, and regulatory processes. It references regulatory proceedings, cost mechanisms, and energy policies, emphasizing the role of the Board and the importance of stakeholder engagement in decision-making.

Section 385
(+ÿ(.ÿ-(/ 01ÿ2(%/#3ÿ45 /$ÿ%ÿ#$0(+)%'1ÿ,$#,ÿ0(7/)ÿ&$ÿ&%#$)ÿ(+ÿ%ÿ+%''(4ÿ +,$'-'$,%, (+ÿ(.ÿ-(/ 01ÿ 2(%/#<ÿTU$$ÿU$0, (+ÿV 8 ÿ-' +0 -/$3ÿ45$'$&1ÿ0(#,Y $..$0, 8$+$##ÿ-'%0, 0$#ÿ)(076$+,ÿ%//ÿ'$/$8%+,ÿ +-7,#3ÿ%##76-, (+#3ÿ6$,5()(/(2 $#3ÿ%+)ÿPBQÿ'...

AI summary The document discusses the regulatory proceedings related to Nova Scotia Power's (NOP) fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism, including the evaluation of its impact on rates and the need for adjustments. It outlines the Board's consideration of PBQ (possibly a program or regulation) and its implications on cost recovery, stakeholder engagement, and the need for prudence reviews.

Section 392
_QOHGNEMÿJVEÿGJPHPJXÿMXMJESÿPS\IOJMYÿ\HGMÿVKMJÿ UP HHÿJ 420-$1!#ÿ72.1ÿ mKOPEJXÿIMÿIÿZVKHEÿ LENGOEN^ÿKJ IHÿOKMJMÿJ K ÿMKO P EJX ÿ ]E ÿ OGMJKSELÿPS\IOJMYÿ\HGMÿMKOPEJIHÿPS\IOJMÿMGOVÿ IMÿEQ[PLKQSEQJIHÿIQNÿEOKQKSPOÿNE[EHK\SEQJÿ PS\IOJMÿ n7ÿ8...

AI summary This text discusses the analysis of a regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia Power (NOP) and the Hydro-Informatics and Jurisdiction (HIJ). It references the Benefit-Cost Analysis Framework (678) and discusses topics such as energy efficiency, cost recovery, and program evaluation in the context of regulatory oversight and stakeholder engagement.

Section 396
5-#/+6ÿ8)( "&&ÿG%),"+&(5"ÿ()ÿ%+,")5/+"ÿ.!"ÿ8%)8(&"ÿ('ÿ.!"ÿ8)/5-)$ÿ."&.Fÿ !")"ÿ/&ÿ-ÿ)-+6"ÿ('ÿ(8./(+&ÿ.!-.ÿ)"6%0-.()&?ÿ%./0/./"&?ÿ-+,ÿ(.!")ÿ&.-#"!(0,")&ÿ -+ÿ (+&/,")ÿ'()ÿ&" (+,-)$ÿ ."&.&Fÿ;I-580"&ÿ/+ 0%,"1ÿ 2ÿJ ÿ7ÿKLÿ!"ÿMDÿ5/6!.ÿG"ÿ%&"'...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings involving Nova Scotia Power and related entities, focusing on energy efficiency programs, fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, and regulatory compliance. It references proceedings, stakeholder engagement, and the evaluation of energy programs and policies.

Section 410
ÿ"#$ÿ&#'#() +ÿ,'"ÿ-.+ +ÿ /012ÿ3045678ÿ58727962ÿ4ÿ3464:;<ÿ;=ÿ607ÿ849<7ÿ;=ÿ>797=162ÿ49?ÿ3;262ÿ6046ÿ@1<06ÿ>7ÿ455:134>:7ÿ6;ÿ49AÿBCDÿ 6A57Eÿ193:F?19<ÿ4ÿ>817=ÿ?72381561;9ÿ;=ÿ7430ÿ6A57ÿ;=ÿ>797=16ÿ;8ÿ3;26GÿH045678ÿIÿ?72381>72ÿ2;@7ÿ4??161;94:ÿ 122F...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation of BCD (likely a program or regulation) and its impact on energy management and efficiency. It outlines the role of BCD in shaping energy policies, the challenges in implementation, and the need for alignment with broader energy efficiency goals. The text also touches on the evaluation of energy programs and the importance of stakeholder engagement.

Section 417
A:LHÿÿ #$%$&'() %ÿ]'.'/)(3ÿ  6 74ÿP@8ÿM>=B9?ÿ=;ÿE898 88?ÿ?@8ÿ;=<8CM:?8Aÿ78MJÿO=MAI^_ÿX@DC@ÿ ?F7DCMOOFÿD9COBA8:ÿM9ÿMAAD?D=9MOÿ<8:8 M M 88?ÿD?:ÿ7OM99D9Eÿ<8YBD<8>89?Hÿÿ  74ÿP@8ÿ8;;8C?ÿ=;ÿMÿV5Wÿ=9ÿE898 D?8Aÿ?=ÿD9:?M9C8:ÿX@89ÿMÿ̀abcdÿ=78...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of electricity rates and the management of energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia. It highlights concerns about the alignment of base rates with actual costs, the role of the Board in managing fuel cost adjustments, and the evaluation of energy efficiency initiatives. The document also touches on the importance of stakeholder engagement and the impact of regulatory decisions on customers.

Section 461
E=Fÿ@=>?>ÿJ>>=@EJ?CHÿ\E?Iÿ?ICÿJ@]AE>E?E=FÿJFHÿEF>?JGGJ?E=Fÿ=RÿLMN>Oÿÿ  7;ÿ[IC>Cÿ@=>?>ÿ@JFÿEF@GAHCÿ?EBCÿ>KCF?ÿ@=GGC@?EFUÿEFR=DBJ?E=FVÿ=W?JEFEFUÿ]A=?C>ÿRD=BÿBAG?EKGCÿ SCFH=D>VÿREGEFUÿKJKCD\=D^VÿJFHÿJKKGE@J?E=F>ÿR=DÿDCWJ?C>ÿJFHÿ=?ICDÿREF...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation of the LMN (likely a regulatory or energy-related initiative) and its impact on cost recovery and rate structures. It emphasizes the importance of aligning base rates with actual costs and the challenges posed by delayed rate adjustments. The text also touches on the role of stakeholder engagement and the need for effective regulatory oversight.

Section 476
B9@F9ÿ K9?B8B9@F9ÿBG=6FA?ÿ79LC@HÿAEC?9ÿ9W=9>B9@F9Hÿ7LÿOAB8BAB9?ÿC>ÿEC?AÿFO?ACG9>?ÿ YlYÿJGB??BC@?ÿ YlYÿ9GB??BC@?ÿF>96A9Hÿ7LÿDC??B8;DO989Hÿ9@9>QLÿ>9?CO>F9?ÿ mAE9>ÿJ@TB>C@G9@A68ÿÿ mAE9>ÿ6B>ÿ9GB??BC@?Pÿ?C8BHÿR6?A9Pÿ86@HPÿR6A9>Pÿ6@HÿCAE9>ÿ9@TB>...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy and utility services in Nova Scotia, focusing on topics such as billing procedures, energy efficiency programs, and regulatory processes. It references various entities, including Nova Scotia Power, and touches on issues like affordability, cost recovery, and stakeholder engagement in regulatory proceedings.

Section 605
Fÿ YJPBJLC@ÿP@D@UJ LC@ÿQ@D@PJIBHD[ÿRHI@DIBJCCKÿEHAIAÿBMÿCHJN\AVBMIBDQÿ GOLCBEÿ^@JCIVÿ ÿ JEHDANIÿALÿJESORÿQ@D@PJIBHDÿEP@JI@ÿ@DYBPHDW@DIJCÿJDNÿROLCBEÿV@JCIVÿ cHUÿdDEHW@eÿfHEB@IKÿ Fÿ _D@PQKÿf@EOPBIKÿ Fÿ F8ÿg7ÿ8h ÿhÿkÿÿh 6ÿ678ÿÿi...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation and management of energy systems, including the evaluation of fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, the role of the Board in ensuring fair practices, and the impact of various regulatory processes on energy efficiency and affordability. It also touches on the importance of stakeholder engagement and compliance with energy regulations.

Section 675
ÿK1??ÿ:4?4;37ÿ5=67;614?ÿ3=;<?1362ÿ6046ÿ 587@7;6ÿ16ÿ<8=>ÿ 7761;Bÿ4??ÿ=<ÿ162ÿ1;67;979ÿA27ÿ34272ÿC7GBG^ÿ=578461=;ÿ9A81;Bÿ=;7ÿ5486ÿ=<ÿ607ÿ 94Jÿ87;9781;Bÿ607ÿ872=A837ÿA;4@41?4:?7ÿ<=8ÿ4;=6078ÿ278@137ÿ?4678ÿ6046ÿ94JFGÿ \ÿD12681:A679ÿ26=84B7ÿ872=A...

AI summary The document discusses the Board of Commissioners' (BC) and Board of Fuel Costs (BFC) handling of 2020 fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, highlighting issues with base rates lagging actual costs and the need for adjustments. It also mentions the 2027-2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Preferred Resource Plan and the importance of program evaluation and stakeholder engagement in regulatory processes.

Section 707
1(-%&ÿ=+-"+ÿ"#0)%ÿ -2G'" ÿ- .ÿ'/-)- 3ÿ #ÿG(#4-%!ÿ"!( '-$ÿ'$"-))'(3ÿ.!(4-"!.ÿ +' ÿ(!\0-(!ÿ-$[!" -#$.ÿ#,ÿ!$!(13ÿ(' +!(ÿ +'$ÿ=- +%('=')6ÿ XÿZ..02G -#$.ÿ(!1'(%-$1ÿ+#=ÿ +!ÿ-$ !("#$$!" -#$ÿG(#"!..ÿ'))#=.ÿ%-. (-/0 !%ÿ. #('1!ÿ #ÿ0 -)-]!ÿ 0$0.!%ÿ-$...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation and evaluation of a fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism and its impact on rate structures, including the need for adjustments to align base rates with actual costs, and mentions regulatory considerations and stakeholder engagement in the process.

Section 758
=C; A>:6=ÿ~s€spt‚ÿB6O>7EBÿ6BB@;>6<9FÿZ> 7?=6B<=C; B<=>DC<>@7ÿ@?ÿ J9<=@:9CAÿJ=@FC; <>@7Vÿ9:9;<=>?>;6<>@7ÿ@?ÿDC>:F>7EBÿ;67ÿ@DO>6<9ÿ 7Eÿ :F>7EBÿ<@ÿ B<=>DC<>@7ÿB8B<9AÿI>7;:CF>7Eÿ>7B<6::6<>@7ÿ@?ÿ6ÿE6BÿA9<9=KVÿB6O>7Eÿ @7BPÿSG>Bÿ ;67ÿ@;;C=ÿ>7ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the regulatory process and considerations related to efficiency programs, including the evaluation of benefits and costs, and references to a National Standard Practice Manual. It touches on the importance of stakeholder engagement and the need for compliance with regulatory standards.

Section 764
"7ÿ'5"3$Eÿ8!.6(!ÿH$!ÿ'77"7ÿ"&"%0$%ÿ)E)"5ÿ %.))> ÿ ?ÿ17ÿ 7ÿ$)ÿ6)6'&&Eÿ'ÿ4"3"/$ ÿ12)ÿ063ÿ5.0"ÿQ6$"&Eÿ!'3ÿ$3"03'&ÿ%.546)$.3ÿ"3($3"ÿ 70$#"3ÿ#"!$%&") ÿP7#'3%"7ÿ!"'ÿD65D)ÿ!'ÿ5.76&'"ÿ!"ÿ'5.63ÿ./ÿ!"'ÿD0.#$7"7ÿ.ÿ'ÿ0..5ÿ.0ÿ 46$&7$3(ÿ'0"ÿ./"3ÿQ6$...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory processes involving Nova Scotia Power and the evaluation of energy efficiency programs, including cost considerations, financial mechanisms, and compliance with regulatory standards. It touches on topics such as fuel cost adjustments, energy efficiency, and stakeholder engagement.

Section 776
ÿ/!ÿ'#),&.!ÿ $,&ÿ#$#(1%!%3ÿ LMNONPÿRSTUVWXÿZ[ÿ]^WU_S̀a[WÿZbÿca[adUeàÿcaXZ]^VaXÿ f$ÿ%&"!ÿ#.!#%?ÿ0. $6ÿ%&"!ÿ-&0.%ÿ&'ÿ,-!ÿ1!#.?ÿ(&)#(ÿ6!$!.#, &$ÿ'.&"ÿ: $?ÿ%&(#.ÿ#$ÿ&,-!.ÿ6!$!.#, &$ÿ .!%&0.)!%ÿ4%0)-ÿ#%ÿ"0%,@.0$ÿ6!$!.#,&.%;ÿ)#$ÿ!E)!!ÿ(&)#(ÿ#.!...

AI summary The text discusses the regulatory proceedings related to the fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism and the impact of delayed base rates on cost recovery. It emphasizes the need for alignment between base rates and actual costs and highlights the importance of prudence reviews and stakeholder engagement in the process.

Section 785
ÿ!"#$%&#'ÿ) +,%$'ÿ-'.,ÿÿ /0ÿ1234ÿ561417ÿ89:;:9:417ÿ5819234<17ÿ60=>2<ÿ9?:<=@A6<9:41ÿ36Bÿ144Cÿ92ÿ:0196;;ÿ38;9:A;4ÿ20@1:94ÿDEF17ÿG?:5?ÿ 36Bÿ96C4ÿH2<3ÿ69ÿ9?4ÿI8:;=:0J7ÿH65:;:9B7ÿ563A817ÿ2<ÿ04:J?I2<?22=ÿ;4K4;LÿM?:1ÿ5?6A94<ÿ=415<:I41ÿ?2Gÿ92ÿ ?2;...

AI summary The document discusses the regulatory considerations surrounding the implementation of DEF (Demand-side Management) programs, including their impact on utility operations, cost recovery, and the need for stakeholder engagement. It highlights the importance of aligning rate structures with program objectives and ensuring that these programs are effectively managed and evaluated.

Section 830
!ÿ#$#%&'() ÿ $,-.'$# ÿ /01210134ÿ567ÿ8093:4ÿ48;301;34ÿ433<ÿ08ÿ1640522ÿ;=201>23ÿ?@Aÿ0B>34ÿ16ÿ5ÿ4>3C1D1CÿE38E:5>91Cÿ5:35ÿD8:ÿ093ÿ >=:>843ÿ8Dÿ73D3::16Eÿ8:ÿ5F81716Eÿ63Gÿ16F340;3604ÿ16ÿ7140:1H=0186ÿ8:ÿ0:564;144186ÿ4B403;4IÿJ914ÿC95>03:ÿ 734C:1H...

AI summary The text discusses the role of MNO in Nova Scotia's energy regulatory process, including its function in cost recovery, fuel cost adjustment mechanisms, and the impact of regulatory decisions on energy pricing and customer affordability. It also highlights the importance of stakeholder engagement and the evaluation of energy efficiency programs.

Section 834
5/?/24ÿ6/5/??@7ÿ1D^/049A/>ÿ̀@26ÿE4979j/ÿ6955/?/24ÿ;<=ÿ 4/0.2171:9/>Fÿ kÿ1m2ÿnopÿ qÿr 7s8 ÿn ÿÿtÿÿ3878oqÿu/A/?@:92:ÿvddÿw\ÿ<<ÿ@26ÿ;=ÿA9@ÿ /x9>492:ÿ0E>41B/?ÿ3?1:?@B>ÿ4.@4ÿ9207E6/ÿ?/>1E?0/>ÿ>E0.ÿ@>ÿ\9Ny9N/2@D7/6ÿ4./?B1>4@4>ÿ̀...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency programs and utility regulations in Nova Scotia, including topics such as energy efficiency, rate designs, and compliance with energy efficiency standards. It references regulatory processes, stakeholder engagement, and the implementation of energy efficiency initiatives.

Section 886
ÿ8)X)8'8ÿ5;ÿ]5 ÿ%&'ÿ%1%2+ÿ+)6'%).'ÿ'(',0;ÿ/,18-7'89ÿ jÿ!27&ÿopqlmÿ5'('6)%#ÿ2,'ÿ2+#1ÿ/-%ÿ)(%1ÿ+'X'+)4'8ÿ%',.#9ÿc1,ÿ%&'ÿ/-,/1#'ÿ16ÿ.2)(0ÿ2ÿYZYÿ71#%ÿ 7-,X'$ÿ%&'ÿYZYÿ5'('6)%#ÿ2,'ÿ'37+-8'8ÿ6,1.ÿ%&'#'ÿ+'X'+)4'8ÿ5'('6)%#9ÿ:&)#ÿ2++1 #ÿ61,ÿ%&'ÿ /,'...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation of a demand-side management (DSM) plan and its impact on utility operations, including cost recovery, efficiency measures, and regulatory considerations. It outlines the need for alignment between cost recovery mechanisms and program implementation, and highlights the importance of stakeholder engagement and evaluation of program effectiveness.

Section 910
ƒlLMRÿaNTJTN~ÿM~MNRoÿhReRQTNMÿR„SRR ÿaNTJTN~ÿM~MNRoÿSLMNMÿƒTJJÿjR aSRÿdURjdfRÿhTJJMHÿ €ÿklRÿbdjNTSTbdNTLeÿjdNRMÿƒTJJÿ RSJTeRÿdMÿVPWMÿdjRÿjRoLUR ÿQjLoÿNlRÿbLjNQLJTLHÿIJJÿRJMRÿhRTefÿRadJ†ÿ QRƒRjÿVPWMÿƒTJJÿjRMaJNÿTeÿQRƒRjÿbdjNTSTbdeNMHÿÿ WRfd...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy and utility matters in Nova Scotia, including topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, affordability, and the impact of various regulatory processes on energy efficiency and customer programs. It references proceedings, legal acts, and stakeholder engagement.

Section 934
!"#$ÿ &ÿ() ÿ+, )- .ÿ /012ÿ34456718ÿ58493162ÿ0:;ÿ<=>2ÿ?36ÿ9537ÿ@:ÿA3@5ÿ1B43?@2Cÿ367ÿ0:;ÿA3@5ÿ1B43?@2ÿ3A5ÿ71DD5A56@ÿDA:Bÿ?:2@E 5DD5?@1F56522ÿ367ÿ;0Gÿ@05ÿ@;:ÿ20:H97ÿI5ÿ583B1657ÿH216Jÿ2543A3@5ÿ3639G252KÿL@ÿ392:ÿ752?A1I52ÿ0:;ÿ@:ÿ ?:67H?@ÿ3ÿB536...

AI summary The document discusses the regulation of energy efficiency programs, including the evaluation of cost-effectiveness, the role of the Board in setting policies, and the implementation of measures such as demand-side management and energy efficiency initiatives. It also touches on the evaluation of program performance and stakeholder engagement.

Section 953
53ÿ45A716145?79Bÿ^5A71614571;?ÿA5789ÿ65?ÿ529;ÿ >8ÿ<98=ÿ7;ÿ6;345A8ÿ45A71614571;?ÿ56A;99ÿHIJÿ1?171571E89GÿHIJÿ7D489Gÿ56A;99ÿ<71217189Gÿ5?=ÿ56A;99ÿ _ 8ÿ89713578=ÿ@;Aÿ856:ÿD85Aÿ;@ÿHIJÿ1342838?7571;?Bÿ̀:8Dÿ9:;<2=ÿ>8ÿ6;345A8=ÿ 56A;99ÿ35?DÿD85A9ÿ...

AI summary The document discusses the role of HIJ in the context of rate-setting and regulatory processes, focusing on the implementation of fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms and their impact on cost recovery and affordability. It also touches on the evaluation of programs and the importance of transparency and stakeholder engagement in regulatory decisions.

Section 973
:9:ÿ9;79ÿ@88=>ÿ@Aÿ7Aÿ7AA=70ÿG7:4:ÿ7A?ÿ7>Bÿ8@00B89B?ÿGFÿ=940494B:ÿB78;ÿ FB7>ÿ:;@=0?ÿGBÿ788@=A9B?ÿD@>ÿ4Aÿ9;BÿFB7>ÿ9;BFÿ7>Bÿ8@00B89B?ÿD>@5ÿ=94049Fÿ8=:9@5B>:Hÿh764970ÿ8@:9:ÿ :;@=0?ÿGBÿ75@>94iB?ÿ@EB>ÿ9;Bÿ>B_=079@>FÿG@@Oÿ04DBÿ@Dÿ9;Bÿ4AEB:95BA9Hÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy costs, including the fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism, the impact of delayed base rates on incentives, and the need for adjustments in energy pricing. It also highlights the importance of regulatory oversight and stakeholder engagement in managing energy resources and ensuring equitable access to services.

Section 1029
!"#$ÿ&'ÿ) +"#,#-!+.ÿ/-0,1&223,#4!00ÿ)0,0ÿ 5678ÿ9::;<=7>ÿ:?@A7=;8ÿ9ÿ=;8B?7:C7@<ÿ@DÿC6;ÿC?9=7C7@<9EÿC;8C8ÿF8;=ÿD@?ÿ988;887 ÿ 9E8@ÿ;O:6987g;8ÿC6;ÿ=78C7 ÿXÿD@?ÿO@?;ÿ=;C97E;=ÿ7 ÿ:?@A7=;8ÿ7 ÿ=;8B?7M;8ÿC6;ÿZ;fÿ;E;O; ÿ:?@A7=;8kÿ uÿXÿ=;8B?7:C7@<ÿ@D...

AI summary The document discusses the regulatory proceedings related to the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ) and the Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LML), including the analysis of cost recovery mechanisms, the impact of fuel-cost-adjustment, and the evaluation of energy efficiency programs. It outlines various regulatory processes, compliance, and stakeholder engagement.

Section 1041
ÿ 91@9ÿ1@I2ÿ3@59<?4F@5ÿ<=925279ÿ<=ÿ@ÿ5@=a2ÿ68ÿ76?<29@Fÿ?6=7<>25@9<6=7Lÿ74?1ÿ@7ÿ2=I<56=H2=9@Fÿ65ÿ2?6=6H<?ÿ >2I2F63H2=9ÿ?6=?25=7Lÿ<=ÿ@>><9<6=ÿ96ÿ@=ÿ<=925279ÿ<=ÿH<= ÿ288<?<2=?Jÿ356a5@Hÿ 3@59<?<3@=9ÿ?6797Kÿ gÿh(i'%$%j(k'ÿ+#,'ÿ-&,'ÿ   8. 7lÿ0...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy programs, including the Clean Energy (CDE) initiative and the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ). It outlines issues with fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms and the need for prudence reviews in energy planning. The document references regulatory processes, stakeholder engagement, and the evaluation of energy efficiency programs.

Section 1086
ÿ 0"ÿ;, "ÿ($ÿ;(+-"-ÿ$ ",ÿ#;+/1#ÿ)"/"$+ #ÿ+/ÿH"'ÿGF.ÿ %0+,"ÿ,(%"'ÿ-+#2( / ÿ' "#ÿ0;"ÿÿ5 20ÿ#5 ,,"'ÿ+592 3ÿ IJKLMNÿPQRSÿTUVWJXYZJ[]ÿ[^ÿ_J]X[L\Zÿ̀YZN]ÿaY\\LYWÿVMN]N\ZÿbYWLNÿc[WWYM]dÿ ÿ 17 eÿfgÿ 6ÿ8ÿh8 ÿÿ8ÿ78ÿijjkÿl ÿ678ÿ6...

AI summary The text discusses the analysis of regulatory proceedings, including the evaluation of programs, policies, and legal frameworks, with a focus on topics such as energy efficiency, affordability, and stakeholder engagement. It also references various regulatory processes and the use of cost-effectiveness and prudence reviews.

Section 1197
stakeholder workshops and to write a report with recommendations on a benefit cost analysis framework for which E1 would be seeking NSEB approval to use in assessing the 2027- 2031 DSM plan. Consistent with comments on the structure for a...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) is developing a benefit-cost analysis (BCA) framework for its 2027-2031 DSM Plan, informed by stakeholder workshops and a review of the National Standard Practice Manual. The report outlines EFG’s recommendations for a Nova Scotia-specific BCA test, based on stakeholder feedback and policy review.

E-3E1 (EE) RIR 1-12 2 passages
Preamble p. p. 1
Request IR-01: - Reference: Evidence Page 7: A benefit-cost ratio threshold of 1.0 or greater of a DSM Plan must - always be satisfied at the portfolio level. While measures that do not meet the ratio threshold - can be included, E1 must j...

AI summary The proceeding addresses EfficiencyOne's (E1) approach to justifying demand-side management (DSM) measures that fail to meet a benefit-cost ratio (BCR) threshold of 1.0. E1 plans to use a regulator-approved cost-effectiveness test, citing factors like equity, emerging technologies, and market needs. The request also asks if prior Board approval is required and if stakeholder input is sought for such measures.

E1 Responses to Eastward Energy Inc. (Eastward Energy) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. pp. 1-4
E1 Responses to Eastward Energy Inc. (Eastward Energy) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL - (b) E1 was directed by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board in their Board Order on E1's 2023-2025 DSM Plan "To provide specific justificati...

AI summary E1 is responding to information requests by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB), explaining that it will justify DSM measures failing cost-effectiveness testing in future resource plans, including the 2027-2031 DSM Plan. E1 engages with the DSMAG, sharing modelling details and seeking input during plan development.

E-5E1 (NSEB) RIR 1-46 1 passage
Date Filed: July 4, 2025 E1 (NSEB) IR-07 Page 9 of 9 p. pp. 23-26
Date Filed: July 4, 2025 E1 (NSEB) IR-07 Page 9 of 9 1 Request IR-08: 2 3 With respect to the NSPM for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Distributed Energy Resource: 4 5 (a) Please identify any Canadian jurisdictions that have adopted the NSPM as t...

AI summary The document discusses a request for information on the adoption of the National Standard Practice Manual (NSPM) for Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) in Canadian jurisdictions, and the response by Energy Futures Group (EFG) stating no jurisdictions have adopted it. It also references feedback from the Demand Side Management Advisory Group (DSMAG) regarding the final draft EFG report, emphasizing stakeholder engagement and confidentiality.

E-8See new revised evidence submitted under E-14 (Evidence of P. Bowman, on behalf of IG) 1 passage
Project Development, Socio-Economic Impact Assessment and Mitigation
on, and major PUB Project Permit reviews of projects >$5 million. For Tolko Manitoba (2014-2015): Assist in negotiations with Manitoba Hydro regarding expansion of steam generation capabilities. For Kwadacha First Nation and Tsay Keh Dene...

AI summary The text outlines various projects involving socio-economic impact assessments, mitigation programs, and energy supply options, with collaborations between Manitoba Hydro, First Nations, and regulatory bodies. Key activities include analyzing floodplain policies, assessing hydroelectric impacts, and supporting mitigation initiatives.

E-9Evidence and Resume of Courtney Lane - Synapse 1 passage
1 Procurement Plans for the state of Rhode Island. This involved collaborating with p. p. 2
1 Procurement Plans for the state of Rhode Island. This involved collaborating with 2 internal and external stakeholders, facilitating the Rhode Island Energy Efficiency 3 Collaborative, overseeing benefit-cost models, testifying before th...

AI summary The individual has experience in energy efficiency, regulatory proceedings, and grid modernization, having testified before multiple state utility commissions. They have not previously testified before the Nova Scotia Energy Board and are providing evidence on behalf of Counsel to the Nova Scotia Energy Board.

E-10Evidence of F. Wyatt - CA 1 passage
2 Q. PLEASE SUMMARIZE YOUR KEY FINDINGS AND OBSERVATIONS p. p. 7
2 Q. PLEASE SUMMARIZE YOUR KEY FINDINGS AND OBSERVATIONS - 3 A. In summary, I respectfully recommend that the Board should: - 4 1) Approve the proposed new benefit cost test as the primary cost-effectiveness test 5 for Nova Scotia. - 6 2)...

AI summary The expert recommends approving a new benefit-cost test as Nova Scotia's primary cost-effectiveness metric, incorporating externalized carbon costs while retaining internalized carbon calculations for secondary tests. Continued stakeholder engagement in refining the test is also advised.

E-10-(i)Resume of Francis Wyatt 1 passage
Ontario p. p. 0
Ontario Ontario Energy Board Served on the Stakeholder Advisory Group (SAG): provided expert advice on efficiency program design and potential study analysis. 2023 - 2024. Small Business Utility Alliance Reviewed Enbridge DSM plan and part...

AI summary The Ontario Energy Board served the Stakeholder Advisory Group (SAG) on efficiency program design (2023-2024). The Small Business Utility Alliance reviewed Enbridge's DSM plan, participated in a litigated proceeding (Matter No. EB-2021-0002, 2021-2022), and testified on program design, cost effectiveness, and stakeholder engagement.

E-17SBA (IG) RIR 1 to 2 1 passage
Response to IR-2:
Response to IR-2: a) No, the only reason why I discussed the non-energy benefits in my evidence was to provide my opinion for the Board's consideration, in the event that the Board decides that it will include non-energy benefits in its de...

AI summary The respondent clarifies that discussing non-energy benefits was to inform the Board's potential inclusion of such benefits in decisions, but considers quantifying them premature. They advocate for using the PAC test over the proposed BCA test to avoid quantifying hard-to-measure benefits like amenity and pride, while suggesting PAC could be supplemented with other data.

E-22CV - Chris Neme - E1 1 passage
Energy Futures Group, Inc p. pp. 4-5
wer Company.Led residential portion of efficiency potential study to assess alternatives to new transmission line. Testified before Public Service Board. (2001-2003) - Efficiency Vermont. Served on Sr. Management team. Supported initial pr...

AI summary The text outlines professional experience in energy efficiency and clean energy programs, including leading studies on transmission alternatives, managing efficiency initiatives with Efficiency Vermont, and designing residential programs for the Long Island Power Authority's Clean Energy Plan. Roles involved regulatory input, EM&V planning, and market integration efforts.

E-24Rebuttal Evidence of E1 including Appendix A - Energy Futures Group Rebuttal Evidence 5 passages
E1 Response p. p. 9
E1 Response and rate impacts.[11](#page-10-0) The balanced plan approach has been an established design principle of DSM in Nova Scotia for several years. In 2016, the Standardized Filing Framework ("Framework") was developed in consultati...

AI summary The document discusses the 'balanced plan approach' in Nova Scotia's Demand Side Management (DSM), established via the 2016 Standardized Filing Framework. Developed with E1, NSP, and DSMAG, it ensures DSM plans balance energy avoidance, costs, and accessibility. The NSUARB endorsed the framework, and E1 has adhered to it since 2016. The Industrial Group signed the Consensus Agreement supporting this approach.

4.1 ONGOING STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT p. p. 13
4.1 ONGOING STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

AI summary The section titled '4.1 ONGOING STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT' outlines the importance of continuous stakeholder involvement in regulatory proceedings, though no specific details or arguments are provided in the text.

Green Energy p. p. 13
Green Energy Mr. Wyatt states: I express overall support of the proposed benefit cost test as a more balanced test. The new benefit values in the proposed test should be vetted and include stakeholders in the process.[20](#page-13-2)

AI summary Mr. Wyatt supports the proposed benefit-cost test as more balanced, advocating for stakeholder involvement in vetting new benefit values.

E1 Response p. p. 13
E1 Response E1 supports the need for ongoing stakeholder engagement and proposes an 'evergreen' periodic review process via the DSMAG. Additional information regarding the proposed 'evergreen' process can be found in Section 3.1 of this Re...

AI summary E1 supports ongoing stakeholder engagement and proposes an 'evergreen' periodic review process through the DSMAG. This is detailed in Section 3.1 of the Rebuttal Evidence. The text also references Francis Wyatt's evidence (M12282, E-10) regarding consumer advocacy.

E1 Response p. p. 22
E1 Response E1 acknowledges that Eastward's valuable information and perspectives regarding DSM are best understood within the scope of its specific, narrowly focused interest. Given this context, E1 recognises that engaging Eastward throu...

AI summary E1 acknowledges Eastward's focus on DSM and suggests one-on-one meetings with the DSMAG to address concerns and avoid conflicts. It also notes Eastward's potential role as an intervenor in Board processes, reflecting its specific involvement.

97786Notice of Public Hearing 1 passage
Board Hearings are open to the public and you may participate as follows:
Board Hearings are open to the public and you may participate as follows: - You may listen to the live hearing by visiting the Board's website at and selecting the "Listen to Live Hearings" option. This will enable you to see the electroni...

AI summary The document outlines procedures for public participation in a regulatory proceeding, including live listening, speaking at the hearing, submitting written comments, and requesting formal intervenor status. Details about the process and timelines are provided, along with a reference to Matter No. M12282 on the Board's website.

100256Board Decision 2 passages
2.0 PROPOSED BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS TEST p. p. 5
ng of this matter, and the filing of its 2032-2036 DSM Plan, to examine methods for quantifying proxy values for amenity, empowerment and pride. The Consensus Agreement also includes a provision that: f) As an integral component of the Eve...

AI summary E1 proposes a Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) test for Demand-Side Management (DSM), supported by a Consensus Agreement. The BCA includes methods to quantify non-energy impacts like amenity and pride, with stakeholder engagement and validation via literature reviews and customer surveys. E1 requests the NSUARB to approve the BCA as the new DSM cost-effectiveness test.

4.7.1 Findings p. pp. 76-77
4.7.1 Findings [209] Noting that E1 is currently preparing its 2027-2031 DSM Plan, Eastward asked the Board to make an early finding about its membership in the DSMAG before its input may be too late to be incorporated into the new plan. [...

AI summary The NSUARB ruled in favor of Eastward's inclusion in the DSMAG, countering E1's objection that Eastward's narrow focus conflicts with DSMAG's purpose. The Board emphasized the value of Eastward's contributions, directing E1 to include Eastward in the DSMAG ahead of the 2027-2031 DSM Plan.

97786Notice of Public Hearing 1 passage
Board Hearings are open to the public and you may participate as follows:
Board Hearings are open to the public and you may participate as follows: - You may listen to the live hearing by visiting the Board's website at and selecting the "Listen to Live Hearings" option. This will enable you to see the electroni...

AI summary The document outlines the procedures for participating in a public board hearing, including options to listen live, speak, submit written comments, and request formal intervenor status. It also provides details on how to access information about the review and timetable for Matter No. M12282.

97928Notice of Intervention - KMKNO & ANSMC 1 passage
NOTICE OF INTERVENTION of KWILMU'KW MAW-KLUSUAQN NEGOTIATION OFFICE and ASSEMBLY OF NOVA SCOTIA MI'KMAQ CHIEFS p. p. 0
NOTICE OF INTERVENTION of KWILMU'KW MAW-KLUSUAQN NEGOTIATION OFFICE and ASSEMBLY OF NOVA SCOTIA MI'KMAQ CHIEFS TAKE NOTICE that Kwilmu'kw Maw-klusuaqn Negotiation Office (KMKNO) hereby seeks to intervene in the above Applications and Proce...

AI summary KMKNO and ANSMC intervene in a regulatory proceeding, asserting Mi'kmaw Aboriginal title to Nova Scotia and opposing potential adverse impacts on Indigenous rights. They seek input on the modified Benefit-Cost Analysis Test for Demand Side Management Plans, emphasizing sustainable development and consultation processes.

97936Notice of Intervention - CA 1 passage
NOTICE OF INTERVENTION OF: CONSUMER ADVOCATE
NOTICE OF INTERVENTION OF: CONSUMER ADVOCATE TAKE NOTICE that the Consumer Advocate hereby intervenes in the above Application and proceeding. The Consumer Advocate represents the interests of residential ratepayers, who may be impacted by...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate intervenes in a regulatory proceeding, representing residential ratepayers who may be affected by an application. They will address issues raised by the Energy Board and are represented by Pink Larkin, with consulting support from Green Energy Economics Group Inc.

98028Synapse (E1) IR 1 to 24 2 passages
Request IR-13:
Request IR-13: - Refer to page 32 and Table 7 in the EFG Report. - a. Please list the "Other" Non-Utility System Impacts that the stakeholder organizations recommended. b. EFG states that "the checks are aligned with cases where 3 or more...

AI summary Request IR-13 asks for a list of 'Other' Non-Utility System Impacts from the EFG Report and seeks clarification on why Energy Security is excluded from the Nova Scotia Test despite stakeholder support. It references page 32 and Table 7 of the EFG Report and questions the alignment of EFG's criteria with stakeholder input.

Request IR-24:
Request IR-24: Refer generally to the EFG Report and the DSMAG stakeholder process for developing the proposed Nova Scotia Test. Please provide a summary of all non-consensus issues. For each - non-consensus issue, please identify which or...

AI summary Request IR-24 seeks a summary of non-consensus issues from the EFG Report and DSMAG stakeholder process regarding the Nova Scotia Test. It requests identification of organizations opposing consensus positions and alternative proposals they advanced.

99112Email NSEB re: Extension approved for IG to provide hearing logistics 1 passage
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ p. p. 0
@novascotia.ca>](mailto:[email protected]) Sent: August 21, 2025 10:20 AM To: Alice Napoleon [ ; Allison Coffin

AI summary An email dated August 21, 2025, was sent from Crystal Henwood of the Nova Scotia government to Alice Napoleon of Synapse Energy and Allison Coffin, likely related to a regulatory proceeding. No substantive content or arguments are visible in the provided text.

99408Letter E1 re: Consensus Agreement 1 passage
Section 1 p. p. 0
James R. Gogan Direct +1 (902) 563 5920 [email protected] 1969 Upper Water St., Suite 1300 McInnes Cooper Tower - Purdy's Wharf Halifax, NS B3J 3R7 TEL: 902.425.6500 FAX: 902.425.6350 Our File: 254441 September 19, 2025 Nova Sc...

AI summary EfficiencyOne has reached consensus with the Consumer Advocate, Small Business Advocate, and East Coast Environmental Law on specific issues related to its application for a new benefit-cost analysis test for evaluating demand side management plans. A Consensus Agreement is submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board for consideration.

99409Email IG re: Change start time of Hearing to 12:30 4 passages
Nancy G. Rubin, K.C.\ p. p. 2
Nancy G. Rubin, K.C.\ Partner She/Her Stewart McKelvey D: 902.420.3337 \ Law Corporation From: Painting-MacLean, Kimberly Sent: September 19, 2025 3:21 PM To: MacNeil, Janet Cc: Alice Napoleon ; Allison Coffin ; Angela Costello ; Angela Ze...

AI summary Email communication regarding EfficiencyOne's application (M12282) for approval of a new Benefit Cost Analysis Test, with reference to a Partial Consensus Agreement and Board Acknowledgement. Nancy G. Rubin, K.C. is listed as a partner at Stewart McKelvey, and the email is sent by Kimberly Painting-MacLean of Nova Scotia's regulatory team.

This is an external email. p. p. 2
This is an external email. Good afternoon, This will acknowledge receipt of EfficiencyOne's Partial Consensus Agreement regarding the above matter received by the Board on September 19, 2025. It has been directed to the Board and staff and...

AI summary The email acknowledges receipt of EfficiencyOne's Partial Consensus Agreement, dated September 19, 2025, which has been directed to the Board and staff and posted as Exhibit N-32 in Matter No. M12282.

Statement of Confidentiality p. p. 2
Statement of Confidentiality This message (including any attachments) may contain private or protected information meant for a specific person or organization. If you received this by mistake, please let the sender know, do not communicate...

AI summary A confidentiality notice regarding EfficiencyOne's M12282 application for a new Benefit Cost Analysis Test with a Partial Consensus Agreement. Sent by Janet MacNeil of McInnes Cooper to Crystal Henwood at the Nova Scotia government, with recipients from multiple organizations.

\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ p. pp. 2-3
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Dear Ms. Henwood, Please find attached corresponden...

AI summary An external email from Janet MacNeil, paralegal for Jim Gogan, references attached correspondence and a Consensus Agreement among EOne and several Intervenors related to a regulatory proceeding. The email cautions against clicking links or opening attachments.

99410Email NSEB re: Hearing to start 12:30 pm On Monday September 22, 2025 2 passages
Good afternoon, p. p. 0
Good afternoon, This will acknowledge receipt of EfficiencyOne's Partial Consensus Agreement regarding the above matter received by the Board on September 19, 2025. It has been directed to the Board and staff and posted as Exhibit N-32 in...

AI summary The document acknowledges receipt of EfficiencyOne's Partial Consensus Agreement in Matter No. M12282, dated September 19, 2025. It has been directed to the Board and staff and posted as Exhibit N-32 on the Board's public website.

\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ p. pp. 3-4
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Dear Ms. Henwood, Please find attached corresponden...

AI summary An email from Janet MacNeil, paralegal for Jim Gogan, attaches correspondence and a Consensus Agreement between EOne and intervenors related to a regulatory proceeding. The email cautions against clicking links or opening attachments.

99638Closing Submission - E1 2 passages
4.4 EVERGREEN PROCESS p. pp. 18-19
4.4 EVERGREEN PROCESS - E1's proposed evergreen process represents a foundational commitment to maintaining the integrity, - relevance, and adaptability of its Proposed BCA framework. This process ensures that the BCA test remains - aligne...

AI summary E1's evergreen process ensures the BCA framework remains aligned with evolving legislation, policy, and market conditions in Nova Scotia. It involves periodic reviews, stakeholder engagement, and collaboration with DSMAG to quantify non-energy impacts. E1 claims no opposition to the process.

5. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE AND HEARING RECORD p. p. 22
ard. [44](#page-23-2) Mr. Bowman himself acknowledged that the PAC test results - at the program and measure levels are provided to the Board as part of a DSM Plan application review. [45](#page-23-3) - Eastward Energy has expressed its co...

AI summary Eastward Energy raised concerns about hybrid heating measures in the 2027-2031 DSM Plan and seeks DSMAG involvement. EfficiencyOne (E1) confirmed consideration of hybrid heating measures and willingness to engage with Eastward Energy. E1 also emphasized stakeholder engagement through an evergreen process.

99640Closing Submission - IG 2 passages
Evidence of Patrick Bowman p. p. 16
Evidence of Patrick Bowman The Industrial Group relies on the evidence filed by Mr. Bowman, and his oral evidence at the hearing, and specifically supports his recommendation to use the PAC as the primary costeffectiveness test. This appro...

AI summary The Industrial Group supports Patrick Bowman's recommendation to use PAC as the primary cost-effectiveness test for DSM programs, aligning E1 with Canadian utilities and PUA goals of reducing electricity costs. Bowman notes PAC's widespread use across Canada and its alignment with customer interests.

DSMAG CONSULTATION p. p. 19
DSMAG CONSULTATION While the purpose and role for the DSMAG is not currently an issue before the Board, the Industrial Group wishes to reiterate its concerns with respect to E1's overreliance on the DSMAG consultations within E1's and EFG'...

AI summary The Industrial Group criticizes E1's reliance on DSMAG consultations as implicit support for the Proposed BCA, emphasizing that DSMAG discussions do not endorse the BCA or its non-energy benefits. They note DSMAG's confidentiality and lack of consensus on the BCA, while welcoming Eastward Energy's potential DSMAG membership.

99641Closing Submission - EE 3 passages
MEMBERSHIP IN THE DSMAG p. p. 2
ctive and environmentally sound overall energy solutions are available for the Province. In this regard Eastward is aligned with the goals of E1 and the DSMAG and does not have a conflicting interest. Ms. Thompson confirmed that the DSMAG...

AI summary The text discusses DSMAG's role as an advisory group, E1's periodic review process, and lack of consensus among members. Eastward aligns with E1 and DSMAG, while Nova Scotia Power and the Industrial Group (a DSMAG member) have differing views. A settlement agreement with consumer advocates is noted.

Mr. Bowman stated in this regard that: p. pp. 6-7
Mr. Bowman stated in this regard that: "If, in step three, your test is going to be the social test, in step two you're going to be thinking about how to achieve those benefits in terms of customer fuel savings and greenhouse gas emissions...

AI summary Mr. Bowman emphasizes that if the PAC test (peak avoidance cost) is prioritized in step three, step two should focus on hybrid heating solutions to avoid peak demand, rather than full electrification. He critiques E1's heat pump example for neglecting peak costs and stresses the need for early communication of peak-avoidance goals to guide program design, ensuring energy efficiency and electrification efforts align with utility cost management.

CONSENSUS AGREEMENT p. pp. 10-11
CONSENSUS AGREEMENT In the Consensus Agreement by certain parties to the proceeding, E1 has agreed to "reflect an assumed quantification of zero for …amenity, empowerment and pride". 51 However, at the same time it has not changed the Non-...

AI summary E1 agreed to set amenity, empowerment, and pride factors to zero in the Consensus Agreement but retained Non-Energy Proxy Values for Beneficial Electrification. Eastward argues this requires a downward adjustment, as the original value included seven factors, three of which are now zero. Dr. Hill and Mr. Neme defend the 10% value as conservative, while Eastward highlights its exclusion from Consensus Agreement discussions.

99644Closing Submission - CA 1 passage
13 i. EfficiencyOne p. pp. 3-5
emissions were avoided due to demand-20 side management, and Mr. Bowman's critique of E1's use of a 2% social discount rate within its proposed BCA.[14](#page-3-18) 21 - 22 23 Notably, E1's proposed BCA Test was modified subsequent to the...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) modified its proposed BCA Test via a Partial Consensus Agreement, adjusting non-energy benefit quantification and proxy values. E1 agreed to conduct research and share results with DSMAG. At the hearing, E1's witnesses discussed the BCA Test and alternatives (PAC, TRC Tests), with EFG's Mr. Neme noting secondary tests' potential. Mr. Bowman critiqued E1's 2% social discount rate use.

99645Closing Submission - SBA 2 passages
Section 1
1 2 3 BEFORE THE NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 4 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY EFFICIENCYONE for approval of a New 5 Benefit-Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating Demand Side Management Plans - Ml2282 6 CLOSING ARGUMENT OF THE SMALL BUSINESS A...

AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks approval for a new Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Test to evaluate Demand Side Management (DSM) plans, following stakeholder consultations. The Small Business Advocate (SBA) emphasizes cost-effectiveness and inclusion of low-income programs despite potential cost inefficiencies. The SBA supports proposed Utility System impacts but highlights ongoing discussions about Non-Utility System impacts.

Section 6
RIR 1 (a) and 1(a)(i}, page 2 of 2, at lines 4-9. 11 M12282, Exhibit E-16, SBA (IG) RIR 2(a}, page 1 of 2. 12 M12282, Exhibit E-17, SBA {IG) RIR 2(b), page 2 of 2, at lines 4-9. - 1 In the interest of obtaining access to the measures and b...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate (SBA) agrees to the Consensus Agreement, which reduces proxy values for certain measures and commits EfficiencyOne to an Evergreen process for reviewing the BCA framework. The SBA recommends adopting the amended BCA Test for 2027-2031, emphasizing progress on DSM while addressing concerns about quantifying non-monetary benefits like empowerment.

99731Reply Submission - EE 1 passage
DEMAND SIDE MANAGENMENT ADVISORY GROUP ("DSMAG") p. p. 2
DEMAND SIDE MANAGENMENT ADVISORY GROUP ("DSMAG") It remains clear from the Closing Submissions of E1 that the DSMAG is intended to continue as the principle vehicle by which E1 will gain input on its DSM plans and programs, and that E1's p...

AI summary Eastward seeks DSMAG membership to contribute to E1's 2027-2031 DSM plan. E1 opposes this without providing reasons, while NSPI rejects E1's BCA test, proposing an alternative. Other DSMAG members, including the IG, support Eastward's inclusion. Eastward argues there is no valid reason to exclude it from DSMAG.

99732Reply Submission - E1 2 passages
Preamble p. p. 2
- EfficiencyOne ("E1") is providing these reply submissions in accordance with the procedural process - established by the Nova Scotia Energy Board (the "Board") at the hearing of matter M12282 on September - 23, 2025. Interested parties h...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) submits reply arguments in matter M12282, responding to positions taken by intervenors Industrial Group, Eastward Energy, and NS Power, which differ from E1's stance. E1 aligns with the Consumer Advocate, Small Business Advocate, and East Coast Environmental Law, among others, who support its application.

3.6 CONSENSUS AGREEMENT p. pp. 12-13
3.6 CONSENSUS AGREEMENT - Eastward challenges the valuation of non-energy impacts in the PCA, arguing that values for Beneficial - Electrification should be adjusted downward the factors of amenity, empowerment, and pride are set to - zero...

AI summary Eastward challenges the PCA's valuation of non-energy impacts in Beneficial Electrification, arguing factors like amenity, empowerment, and pride should be zero. E1 defends the current proxy values, citing expert agreement and Eastward's lack of supporting evidence.

99880Board Letter re: directs EfficiencyOne to include Eastward as a DSMAG member 1 passage
Section 1 p. p. 0
November 4, 2025 [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) James R. Gogan McInnes Cooper McInnes Cooper Tower – Purdy's Wharf 1969 Upper Water Street, Suite 1300 Halifax, NS B3J 3R7 Dear Mr. Gogan: M12282 – Effi...

AI summary The Board has cancelled a hearing in M12282 regarding EfficiencyOne's proposed DSM Plan. Eastward Energy seeks DSM Advisory Group (DSMAG) membership, but EfficiencyOne opposes it, citing potential conflicts. The Industrial Group supports broader DSMAG participation, while the Board acknowledges Eastward's value but has not yet ruled on its request.

100256Board Decision 2 passages
Sustainable prosperity long-term objective p. p. 36
Sustainable prosperity long-term objective - 5 (1) The long-term objective of the Government is to achieve sustainable prosperity. - (2) To achieve its objective of sustainable prosperity, the Government shall - (a) establish, adopt, suppo...

AI summary The Government of Nova Scotia aims to achieve sustainable prosperity through integrated environmental and economic goals, public awareness campaigns, clean economy growth, well-being initiatives, supportive regulation, and continuous improvement in social, environmental, and economic indicators.

4.7.1 Findings p. pp. 76-77
4.7.1 Findings [209] Noting that E1 is currently preparing its 2027-2031 DSM Plan, Eastward asked the Board to make an early finding about its membership in the DSMAG before its input may be too late to be incorporated into the new plan. [...

AI summary Eastward requested early inclusion in the DSMAG to contribute to the 2027-2031 DSM Plan. E1 opposed, arguing Eastward's narrow focus conflicts with DSMAG's purpose. The Board rejected E1's concerns, citing Eastward's valuable input and directed E1 to include Eastward as a DSMAG member.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →