Topic:"Stakeholder Engagement" in M12451

2. Storm Rider and Stakeholder Engagement The Board issued the following directive with respect to filing its application for a Storm Rider and the stakeholder engagement for agreement on the presentation of materials at para. 338 of the 2...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) directed NS Power to include detailed storm restoration, hardening, and vegetation management costs in each Storm Rider application during a three-year trial period. Stakeholder engagement was required to determine information presentation. NS Power filed its first Storm Rider Application in 2024 for 2023 costs and will not file for 2026 due to no Level 4 storms.

3. Climate Change Adaptation Plan The Board's directive about the Climate Change Adaptation Plan is found at para. 340 of the 2023- 2024 GRA decision: It is not clear to the Board whether the items identified by NS Power in its response to...

AI summary The Board directs NS Power to develop a formal Climate Change Adaptation Plan by 2025, citing its importance for storm restoration cost prudence and capital processes. NS Power already has a plan and collaborates with CALP, BPTC, and CEATI groups on wildfire mitigation and best practices. Costs will be deferred for recovery post-GRA.

2026-2027 GRA Direct Evidence Appendix 3A Page 3 of 14 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) development of standards through the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) which is incorporating climate risk into its standards, including...

AI summary NS Power is updating its Climate Change Adaptation Plan and Wildfire Mitigation Guide, to be filed as Appendix 3B and 3C. The Canadian Standards Association (CSA) is integrating climate risk into standards. NS Power presented updates at a CALP technical conference attended by the Consumer Advocate, Small Business Advocate, and Industrial Group.

2026-2027 GRA Direct Evidence Appendix 3A Page 4 of 14 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) NS Power has undertaken an updated Cost of Service Study and Line Loss Study. This included an extensive consultation process. In accordance...

AI summary NS Power conducted updated Cost of Service and Line Loss Studies, following the Board's directive, with biannual stakeholder engagement updates since 2024. Studies are included in Appendices 12A, B, and C of the GRA.

9. Low-Income Customer Collections and Arrears In discussing the need to address concerns about rates for customers, the Board provided the following directive at paragraph 411 of the 2023-2024 GRA Decision: The proposed review and consult...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board directed NS Power, the Affordable Energy Coalition, and the Consumer Advocate to review the 2013 rate changes and establish a systematic evaluation method. A working group, including these entities, has implemented initiatives to assist low-income customers and those in arrears, with reports due by April 30, 2023.

1.2. Goals and Objectives The goal of the Climate Adaptation Plan is to ensure the utility continues to successfully deliver on its mission to provide safe, reliable and affordable electricity, while improving its resilience to climate cha...

AI summary NS Power's Climate Adaptation Plan aims to ensure reliable electricity delivery while enhancing resilience to climate change. Key objectives include integrating climate risks into asset management, leveraging climate science, reducing vulnerabilities, fostering industry collaboration, and driving innovation for long-term adaptation.

This adaptation planning exercise supports elements of the two pillars as described below: Pillar 1 (Deliver Value for Customers) : We will be a trusted partner and deliver exceptional service. Adaptation planning will support the provisio...

AI summary This adaptation planning exercise supports Pillar 1, which focuses on delivering value for customers by ensuring reliable electricity service, improving customer experience, enhancing stakeholder engagement, and fostering innovation to provide customers with more options.

2026-2027 GRA Direct Evidence Appendix 3B Page 54 of 54 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) - Monitoring Plan : Creating a robust climate data and weather monitoring plan to continually collect observations of key climate variables...

AI summary NS Power outlines a climate monitoring plan to collect data on key climate variables, allocate resources for monitoring, collaborate with external organizations, enhance in-house data collection technologies, and benchmark empirical data against climate projections to inform climate change pathways.

2026-2027 GRA Direct Evidence Appendix 3C Page 29 of 38 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) In addition to equipping crews with the necessary tools, NS Power emphasizes the importance of training and awareness. Personnel receive re...

AI summary NS Power, the Department of Natural Resources & Renewables, and the Emergency Management Office (EMO) collaborate on wildfire mitigation through training, emergency preparedness, and community resilience initiatives. NS Power focuses on personnel training, while the Department integrates wildfire response into forest health planning, and EMO coordinates emergency efforts.

4. Consider Additional Applicable Factors: - Weather Conditions: High winds, dry conditions, or other adverse weather. - Community Impact: Assess potential impact on critical infrastructure and vulnerable populations.

AI summary The analysis considers adverse weather conditions and community impacts, including effects on critical infrastructure and vulnerable populations, as factors in the regulatory proceeding.

5. Community Engagement: • Communicate potential shutoffs with stakeholders and the community, especially vulnerable populations. Provide advanced warnings to minimize the impact of shutoff.

AI summary The document emphasizes the importance of communicating potential utility shutoffs to stakeholders and vulnerable communities, highlighting the need for advanced warnings to mitigate adverse impacts.

7. Post-Event Analysis: - Conduct post-event validation and analysis with NS Power and emergency responder personnel to assess the effectiveness of shutoffs. - Incorporate improvements and refinements of the decision-making process and exe...

AI summary The post-event analysis involves validating shutoff effectiveness with NS Power and emergency responders, refining decision-making processes, and requiring stakeholder consultation before finalizing the PSPS protocol. Improvements in execution and protocol development are emphasized.

7.2 Stakeholder Engagement for Vegetation NS Power engages with both the Nova Scotia FireSmart and Prevention Committee and the Halifax Wildfire Advisory Committee. These collaborations aim to enhance wildfire risk reduction strategies and...

AI summary NS Power collaborates with the Nova Scotia FireSmart and Prevention Committee and the Halifax Wildfire Advisory Committee to enhance wildfire risk reduction strategies, improve communication, and coordinate response efforts. These partnerships involve sharing best practices, joint training, and implementing wildfire prevention plans to protect infrastructure and communities.

10.0 Resources for Wildfire Prevention and Mitigation Best Practices NS Power continues to engage with electric utilities and other stakeholders to ensure its proactive approach to wildfire risk management is aligned and/or leading industr...

AI summary NS Power collaborates with electric utilities, Electricity Canada's committees, and the Centre for Energy Advancement Through Technological Innovation to develop wildfire mitigation best practices. It participates in the Best Practices Transmission Committee's guide drafting and engages with industry stakeholders to align with leading wildfire risk management approaches.

1.0 GENERAL DESCRIPTION This document describes the plan for administering Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NS Power) Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FAM), which was approved by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (as of April 1, 2025 referred to...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FAM), approved by the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB), which recovers fuel costs from customers. The Base Cost of Fuel is reset every two years via General Rate Applications (GRA) or Board orders, with stakeholder input and audits ensuring transparency. The FAM adjusts rates based on actual vs. base fuel costs.

Annual Filing Requirements for Base Cost of Fuel Forecast For each year in which NS Power applies to adjust the Base Cost of Fuel, a load forecast, Base Cost of Fuel and net system requirement forecast filing for the upcoming FAM year (Jan...

AI summary NS Power must submit annual filings for Base Cost of Fuel forecasts using standardized templates from Appendix B and C. The Board considers stakeholder input and approved methodologies, with quarterly and monthly reporting requirements. Changes to templates require Board approval.

6.0 STAKEHOLDER REVIEW AND DISCOVERY Monthly, quarterly and annual non-confidential and confidential reporting will be available for access and viewing. NS Power confidential reporting will be available electronically or in a confidential...

AI summary The document outlines stakeholder access to NS Power's non-confidential and confidential fuel cost reports, including requirements for confidentiality agreements. It details procedures for reviewing and challenging fuel cost methodologies, forecasts, and adjustments (AA/BA) during hearings. Definitions for key terms like Base Cost of Fuel (BCF), Actual Adjustment (AA), and Balance Adjustment (BA) are provided, along with access protocols for electronic data and reports.

1.0 GENERAL DESCRIPTION This document describes the plan for administering Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NS Power) Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FAM), which was approved by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (as of April 1, 2025 referred to...

AI summary The document outlines NS Power's Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FAM) plan, approved by the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB). It details how the Base Cost of Fuel is calculated, reset via General Rate Applications (GRA), and adjusted for under-recovery balances. Stakeholders may challenge methodology and forecasts, with the Board conducting audits. Rates are adjusted based on the Cost of Service Study (COSS).

Annual Filing Requirements for Base Cost of Fuel Forecast For each year in which NS Power applies to adjust the Base Cost of Fuel, a load forecast, Base Cost of Fuel and net system requirement forecast filing for the upcoming FAM year (Jan...

AI summary NS Power must submit annual, quarterly, and monthly filings using standardized templates for Base Cost of Fuel forecasts, with stakeholder input required for revisions. The Board considers fuel forecasts and stakeholder comments when setting annual rates. Templates are approved by the Board's May 15, 2007 order.

ses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, stakeholders shall not be precluded from reviewing prior years' actual results versus prior forecasts in addressing the propriety of the succeeding year's forecast. 2026-2027 GRA Direct Evidence Appendix...

AI summary The document outlines stakeholder review processes for evaluating forecasts against prior years' actual results and defines key terms like Actual Adjustment (AA), Balance Adjustment (BA), and Annual Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC). It emphasizes transparency in fuel cost recovery and balance adjustments, with definitions critical to regulatory proceedings.

1.5.4 Reliability Implementation This is a new department created since the 2023-2024 GRA which includes vegetation management, reliability standards, community engagement, and line inspection programs. The $2.1 million increase in actual...

AI summary A new department established post-2023-2024 GRA handles vegetation management, reliability standards, community engagement, and line inspections. A $2.1M increase in 2024 operating expenses stems from expanded staffing in the Reliability Standards & Engagement team to centralize planning and improve customer communication under NS Power's Five-Year Reliability Plan.

REDACTED Appendix 7A – OM&G Costs by Group - Enhancement of the asset management approach to reduce substation maintenance cycles and costs. - Addition of GPS automatic vehicle locators on all T&D fleet vehicles in order to track crew on-s...

AI summary NS Power outlines initiatives to reduce OM&G costs through technology integration (e.g., GPS, GIS, ADMS), process optimization (e.g., mobile fueling, shift repurposing), and collaboration with Bell Aliant and government departments. These measures aim to improve efficiency, reduce downtime, and lower operational expenses.

1.6.2 Grid Modernization and Customer Integration The Grid Modernization and Customer Integration team focuses on enhancing the customer experience by delivering new solution offerings to meet emerging customer demands in the rapidly evolv...

AI summary The Grid Modernization and Customer Integration team enhances customer experience through digital solutions and grid modernization. NS Power provided a restated 2024 GRA Compliance Budget to compare costs with the 2023-2024 GRA, citing inflation and other factors as main cost drivers for higher operating expenses.

Grid Modernization and Customer Integration - Operating costs associated with the WAM Support team, which were not yet in place at the time of the 2023-2024 GRA. The responsibilities of this team, as contemplated in the WAM capital applica...

AI summary The document discusses the WAM Support team's cost-saving achievements and operational improvements, including automated scheduling and inventory tracking. It also notes increased staffing in the Customer Experience team due to the restated 2024 GRA Compliance forecast. NS Power's WAM initiative has exceeded cost-saving targets, while NS Power faces higher operating expenses from expanded customer-focused initiatives.

sumed to be clear of any additional archaeology requirements, unless recommendations were made in the original report for additional archaeological work. Boreas Heritage strongly cautions this assumption may change following review by CCTH...

AI summary The report discusses the need for consultation with CCTH and Mi’kmaw communities before decommissioning NSPI assets, noting that such consultations may impact cost estimates. Archaeological and environmental considerations are also highlighted as potential factors affecting the final costs.

1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 3 In the Nova Scotia Energy Board's (NSEB, Board) decision on Nova Scotia Power Inc's NS - 4 Power, Company) general rate application (GRA), dated February 2, 2023, the Board approved a - 5 settlement agreement requiri...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) mandated Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) to update its Cost of Service Study (COSS) by December 31, 2025, reflecting developments like renewable integration and grid-scale storage. NS Power submitted the application after stakeholder collaboration, with unresolved issues identified despite extensive input from advocates and industry groups.

- 4 to be consultative in nature, undertaken through a comprehensive stakeholder process facilitated - 5 by an expert COS consultant. NS Power retained Elenchus Research Associates Inc. (Elenchus) as - 6 its expert consultant at the end of...

AI summary NS Power conducted a consultative process in 2024 with stakeholders to address the Cost of Service (COS) treatment, facilitated by Elenchus and mediated by Bruce Outhouse. The process included technical conferences, resolution sessions, and extensive data exchange, resulting in multiple appendices with models, DR responses, and other supporting documents.

Cost of Service Study Redacted 1 in NS Power's 2023/2024 GRA. Following that, sessions were held regularly and focused either 2 on more specific topics within the COSS, such as minimum system study or bundled vs unbundled 3 service, or foc...

AI summary NS Power conducted 15 formal stakeholder sessions in 2024 to refine its 2023/2024 Cost of Service Study (COSS), using input to update positions and analyze models. A tracking document facilitated discussions but was not binding. Stakeholder engagement influenced prioritization and COSS revisions.

1 4.0 OVERVIEW OF NS POWER'S PROPOSAL 2 3 NS Power has identified several areas within the existing COSS that can be updated to respond to 4 changes such as increased renewables being brought online, as was ordered by the Board, and to 5 b...

AI summary NS Power proposes updates to the Cost of Service Study (COSS) to align with changes in the electricity market, including increased renewables, and a principled approach focusing on justified changes. They consider cost causation, alignment with Canadian jurisdictions, and seek to simplify the COSS based on stakeholder feedback, using Elenchus' expertise.

1 6.0 PROPOSED MAINTENANCE OF STATUS QUO 2 - 3 Through the detailed stakeholder sessions, NS Power and stakeholders comprehensively reviewed 4 each component of the current COSS. Through this review, NS Power identified areas of interest

AI summary This section outlines the proposed maintenance of the status quo, noting that NS Power and stakeholders have reviewed the current Cost of Service Study (COSS) and identified areas of interest during detailed stakeholder sessions.

- 5 to stakeholders and where stakeholders may have alternative proposed approaches to the treatment - 6 within COSS. NS Power has outlined these areas in the below sections and provided support for - 7 the Company's position that the main...

AI summary The document discusses the need to engage stakeholders and consider alternative approaches within the Cost of Service Study (COSS), while NS Power supports maintaining the status quo.

PARTIALLY CONFIDENTIAL 2026-2027 GRA Direct Evidence Appendix 12A(2) Page 1046 of 1218 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Cost of Service Study Process (NSUARB M11475) NSPI Responses to IG Data Requests

AI summary This document outlines the Cost of Service Study Process under NSUARB M11475, with NSPI providing responses to data requests from Independent Generators. It relates to regulatory processes involving cost analysis and stakeholder engagement.

1.0 GENERAL DESCRIPTION This document describes the plan for administering Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NS Power) Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FAM), which was approved by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (Board) in its decision letter i...

AI summary This document outlines the administration plan for Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FAM), approved by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board in 2008. It explains how the Base Cost of Fuel is calculated, reset, and adjusted, with stakeholder opportunities for challenge and audit processes in place.

6.0 STAKEHOLDER REVIEW AND DISCOVERY Monthly, quarterly and annual non-confidential and confidential reporting will be available for access and viewing. NS Power confidential reporting will be available electronically or in a confidential...

AI summary The document outlines the availability of monthly, quarterly, and annual reporting for stakeholder review, including confidential and non-confidential data. Access to confidential information requires a Confidentiality Agreement. Stakeholders will have the opportunity to challenge NS Power's fuel costs and forecasting methodology during hearings.

Board Directive - GRA The 2022-2024 GRA Settlement Agreement provided as follows regarding the Line Loss Study and COSS: NS Power must file a Cost of Service Study and a Line Loss Study prior to filing its next GRA or December 31, 2025, wh...

AI summary The 2022-2024 GRA Settlement Agreement requires NS Power to file a Cost of Service Study and Line Loss Study, with stakeholder engagement, prior to the next GRA or December 31, 2025. The NSUARB directed semi-annual progress reports starting January 31, 2024. Costs may be deferred and recovered through future rates with Board approval.

Elenchus Approach to the Review - Facilitate NS Power's Stakeholder Process ‐ technical sessions, with goal being to: - Assist in clarifying and understanding the concerns and views of all parties - Distinguish between interest‐based and p...

AI summary The Elenchus Approach to the Review outlines a structured process to facilitate NS Power's stakeholder engagement, clarify stakeholder concerns, and review NS Power's cost allocation methodologies. It also includes a survey of utility practices in Canada and the US, and the preparation of evidence for filing with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.

Outline of Comments - 1. Introduction - 1. SBA objectives for the COSS - 2. Underlying Principles for COSS - 3. Implementing COSS changes concurrent to the Transition of the Nova Scotia electric supply portfolio - 2. Comments on COSS issue...

AI summary The document outlines comments related to the Customer Outage Service Standards (COSS), including objectives, principles, and implementation during the transition of Nova Scotia's electric supply portfolio, as well as feedback on COSS issues discussed during the stakeholder process.

Memorandum To: Participants in NS Power COSS Stakeholder Process From: NS Power Date: April 12, 2024 Re: Process for Remaining COSS Sessions The following details the process discussed at the stakeholder meeting on April 10, 2024: - NS Pow...

AI summary NS Power outlines the process for remaining COSS sessions, including timelines for submitting initial positions, data requests, and session proposals. A tracking document will be used to record stakeholder positions, and a final resolution session is planned for late June.

2026-2027 GRA Direct Evidence Appendix 12A(6) Page 6 of 6 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) that NS Power and its expert consultant could also support. Although a resolution of all issues was not ultimately reached during these s...

AI summary NS Power held a final session in December 2024 to review updated Cost of Service Study (COSS) proposals following stakeholder engagement. The session allowed stakeholders to provide feedback and clarification on NS Power's updated positions and modeling related to the 3CP and other issues.

1.1 OVERVIEW - 3 Nova Scotia Power Inc. ("NS Power") retained Elenchus Research Associates - 4 ("Elenchus") in December 2023 to assist the company during its COSS review process. - 5 The goal of this process was to refine NS Power's existi...

AI summary NS Power engaged Elenchus Research Associates to assist with updating its Cost of Service Study (COSS) in 2023, considering recent developments such as renewable integration, gas generation, and grid storage. The process involved stakeholder sessions in 2024 to discuss proposed changes and their alignment with regulatory principles.

This document describes the plan for administering Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NS Power) Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FAM), which was approved by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (Board) in its decision letter issued on December 11, 20...

AI summary This document outlines the administration plan for NS Power's Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FAM), approved in 2008. It explains how the Base Cost of Fuel is calculated, reset, and used to adjust customer rates based on actual fuel costs. The FAM includes provisions for audits, stakeholder input, and interest calculations on over/under-recovery amounts.

6.0 STAKEHOLDER REVIEW AND DISCOVERY Monthly, quarterly and annual non-confidential and confidential reporting will be available for access and viewing. NS Power confidential reporting will be available electronically or in a confidential...

AI summary Stakeholders will have access to monthly, quarterly, and annual reporting, including confidential data, through a secure document site and electronic data cart. The Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FAM) processes will follow a regulatory calendar, and stakeholders will be able to challenge NS Power's fuel costs, methodology, and forecasts during hearings.

Highlights of Emera's Corporate Governance Practices Director Independence. All Emera Directors are independent from management, except Emera's President and CEO. Board and Committee Leadership. The Charter of the Chair of the Board and po...

AI summary The document outlines Emera's corporate governance practices, emphasizing director independence, board structure, risk management, shareholder engagement, and ongoing director education. It highlights the separation of the CEO and board chair roles, the rigorous risk management process, and the share ownership requirements for directors.

SUSTAINABILITY MATERIALITY ASSESSMENT Emera is committed to transparency, accountability, understanding stakeholder expectations and improving disclosures on the material sustainability priorities that matter most to stakeholders. Those su...

AI summary Emera conducts a sustainability materiality assessment to identify key sustainability priorities, categorized as strategic, core, and evolving. These priorities are reviewed annually with the SMC and SRC to ensure alignment with stakeholder interests and business impact. A full update is conducted every three years.

Engagement Emera has a mature and robust program of engaging with financial analysts, investors and other stakeholders through direct meetings, investor events, quarterly analyst calls and other initiatives. We broadcast our quarterly earn...

AI summary Emera engages with stakeholders through various initiatives such as direct meetings, investor events, and quarterly analyst calls. In 2024, Emera's executives met with major shareholders and held an investor day. The Board oversees systems for receiving and monitoring shareholder feedback.

Shareholders are encouraged to provide feedback to management and/or the Board Contact information To reach management: President and CEO Email: [email protected] Chief Financial Officer Email: [email protected] Executive Vice P...

AI summary The document outlines how the Board and management of Emera engage with shareholders and stakeholders, including meetings with large shareholders and institutional investors to discuss governance topics such as Board renewal, executive succession, and risk oversight. The Board reviews its engagement practices annually to improve their effectiveness.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ("NCGC") Jochen E. Tilk (Committee Chair) (1) James V. Bertram Henry E. Demone B. Lynn Loewen - Committee Members are 100% independent - The Committee met in camera without management at every...

AI summary The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (NCGC) is composed of 100% independent members. The Committee met in camera without management present at every meeting in 2024.

ROLE OF THE NCGC The NCGC assists the Board with a variety of matters relating to corporate governance. One of its primary duties is to provide the Company with a list of nominees for election as Directors to be included in the Company's M...

AI summary The NCGC supports the Board in corporate governance matters, including director nominations, succession planning, governance practices, and compensation recommendations. It ensures compliance with governance best practices and oversees the evaluation of the Board and its members.

Conduct a workshop for Emera Inc. employees on psychological safety. All functional leaders will submit a team action plan beginning in 2024. • 95% of Emera employees and contractors will complete cyber security training.

AI summary The text outlines a plan to conduct a workshop on psychological safety for Emera Inc. employees, with functional leaders required to submit team action plans starting in 2024. It also mentions that 95% of Emera employees and contractors will complete cyber security training.

red by the facilities is assumed to be mostly self-supplied, with some top up supply from NS Power. The development of this new sector will continue to be monitored in future Load Forecast Reports. Page 8 of 8 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORM...

AI summary This document outlines the purpose of the preliminary 10-year load forecast presentation, emphasizing stakeholder engagement, feedback integration, and addressing outstanding issues in the final report.

Halloween in Downtown Sydney scheduled for Oct. 25 CAPE BRETON POST STAFF Attention trick or treaters and candy enthusiasts: Halloween in Downtown Sydney is set for Oct. 25. The event is slated for 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. or while quantities las...

AI summary Halloween in Downtown Sydney is scheduled for Oct. 25, featuring trick-or-treating at over 40 businesses, music by DJMajestic, performances, and a costume contest. The event runs from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. or while supplies last, with Charlotte Street closed to traffic. Philippa Bryden of the Sydney Downtown Development Association expressed excitement about the event, which previously attracted thousands of participants. A rain date is set for Oct. 26.

Lower Water Street Halifax, Nova Scotia Depending on the circumstances, this public hearing may be held by video conference. Board Hearings are open to the public and you may participate as follows: - You may listen to the live hearing by...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board amended notice outlines procedures for a public hearing, including participation methods (live listening, speaking, written comments), deadlines (Nov 27, 2025 for comments; Oct 30, 2025 for intervenor requests), and access to application documents via the Board's website. Matter No. M12451 is referenced.

Community group tried to save homes frombus lane construction JEN TAPLIN It was an attempt to move downtown Halifax homes in the path of demolition for bus lanes to the front of the line to be considered for heritage status. But it didn't...

AI summary A community group, Friends of the Halifax Common, sought heritage status for homes threatened by bus lane construction in Halifax. Their applications were rejected by the Heritage Advisory Committee, which prioritized other cases. The group criticized the lack of assessment on the impact of the project on affordable housing and heritage.

N.S. to explore nuclear technology with Ontario AARON BESWICK Premier Tim Houston announced anagreementtoworkwithOntario to explore small modular reactor technology. But don't expect nuclear power to be generated in Nova Scotia in the fore...

AI summary Nova Scotia and Ontario have signed a memorandum of understanding to explore small modular reactor technology, though no immediate nuclear power generation is planned. The agreement focuses on knowledge exchange and federal lobbying, not financial commitments. Premier Tim Houston emphasized learning from Ontario's experience, while noting Nova Scotia's reliance on renewables like wind and solar. Ontario's Darlington reactor project, set to be completed by 2035, highlights potential long-term opportunities.

SOME POSITIVE TRENDS AND SURVEY RESULTS Traskpointedoutafewnumbers that are headed in the right direction: Fatal and serious pedestriancollisions were down last year—to 21 from 33 in 2023 — and there were fewer pedestrian collisions at sig...

AI summary Fatal and serious pedestrian collisions in Halifax decreased to 21 in 2024 from 33 in 2023, with fewer incidents at signalized intersections. Halifax ranks lower in fatal collisions compared to other Canadian cities. A survey found 48% of residents perceive the road network as safe, with transit perceived as the safest mode and biking/motorcycling as the least safe.

REDACTED 1 Request IR-51: 2 3 Reference: N-6 - 2026-2027 GRA Direct Evidence Appendix 7C Page 53-54 of 58 4 5 Per N-6, (Appendix 7C), page 53-54 of 58, we understand that labour has increased from 6 2024 compliance restated and 2024 actual...

AI summary The document discusses a request related to increased labor costs for grid modernization and customer integration from 2024 to 2026, specifically addressing additional resources in the Smart Meter Operations Center and salary escalations. The response directs to other exhibits and documents for detailed information.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-52: 2 3 Reference: N-6 - 2026-2027 GRA Direct Evidence Appendix 7C Page 53-54 of 58 4 - 5 Per N-6, (Appendix 7C), page 53-54 of 58, we understand that contracts have increased from 6 2024 compliance restated a...

AI summary The request seeks clarification on the increase in contracts related to grid modernization and customer integration from 2024 to 2026, citing increased requirements for customer experience, SMOC, Telecom, and customer engineering and innovation teams. A response is pending.

Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) The Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) is a comprehensive public utility planning exercise that integrates resource options (both supply and demand-side) in order to develop a long-term electricity strategy for t...

AI summary The Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) is a long-term electricity strategy for Nova Scotia Power, developed through a comprehensive planning process that considers both supply and demand-side resources. It is updated periodically, with the 2020 IRP indicating the need for revision due to changes in environmental policy, load, and resource assumptions. The IRP is submitted to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) and involves stakeholder engagement.

10-Year System Outlook (10YSO) NS Power's Ten-Year System Outlook (10YSO) assesses system generation capacity, considering load forecasts, planned generation additions, and environmental regulations, while adhering to the Nova Scotia Whole...

AI summary NS Power's 10-Year System Outlook (10YSO) evaluates system generation capacity, load forecasts, and environmental regulations, and is submitted to the NSUARB. It is an annual assessment of system capacity and resource adequacy, not an integrated resource plan, and involves stakeholder engagement.

General Rate Application (GRA) As a regulated entity, NS Power must obtain approval from the NSUARB to change the rates charged to its Customers for the services it provides them. NS Power's GRA includes many components including anticipat...

AI summary NS Power must obtain approval from the NSUARB to change its rates. The GRA includes components such as fuel costs, operating costs, depreciation, capital structure, and revenue requirement. It is subject to stakeholder engagement including public hearings and written information requests.

1 have ramped up in 2024. A focused effort on setting up project processes and procedures 2 for both teams will continue into the first two quarters of 2025. 3 4 Environmental Assessment (EA) Filing: NS Power received approval for the EA o...

AI summary NS Power has made progress on the Reliability Tie Project, including environmental assessments, Mi'kmaq engagement, engineering, procurement, and stakeholder outreach. The project is on track with key milestones set for late 2024 and early 2025.

(2) YTD is June as of June 30 as regulated financial statements are only calculated quarterly. 1 Request IR-16: 21 of stakeholders from across the electricity sector and related fields. Attendees included 22 representatives from NS Power,...

AI summary The text references a working group involving stakeholders from the electricity sector, including NS Power, EfficiencyOne, and various other organizations, as well as the Consumer Advocate. NS Power participated in workshops and contributed to a climate adaptation survey.

Adaptation Plan to the CALP team in October 2021. These sessions informed the development of the sector-wide strategy and ensured alignment with NS Power's internal planning processes. NS Power has participated in several CALP meetings eac...

AI summary NS Power has engaged with the CALP team since 2021 to develop a sector-wide climate adaptation strategy, aligning with internal planning processes. Sub-committees were established in 2023-2025 to advance CALP initiatives, and a session was hosted for regulatory stakeholders in 2025. NS Power also participates in industry organizations like CEATI and EPRI to enhance utility resilience and climate adaptation strategies.

Five-Year Reliability Plan – 2025-2029 NON-CONFIDENTIAL 2026-2027 GRA NSEB IR-20 Attachment 1 Page 7 of 40 1 customer engagement. In other jurisdictions in the United States and Canada, surveys have been 2 distributed to customers to gathe...

AI summary NS Power supports integrating customer engagement and Value of Lost Load (VoLL) into its reliability planning process. The Plan emphasizes adaptability and flexibility in response to external factors, and highlights the importance of balancing system resilience investments with ratepayer impacts. The Board's 2022 decision on capital expenditures is referenced as a key consideration.

Five-Year Reliability Plan – 2025-2029 NON-CONFIDENTIAL 2026-2027 GRA NSEB IR-20 Attachment 1 Page 8 of 40 1 disruptive events but could help to reduce damage and could also facilitate the recovery from a disrupted state to normal operatio...

AI summary The text discusses the importance of balancing reliability and resiliency investments with rate impacts, emphasizing the need for open dialogue between NS Power, customers, and government to align system performance and costs. It references prior regulatory decisions related to the 2022 and 2024 ACE Plans.

Five-Year Reliability Plan – 2025-2029 NON-CONFIDENTIAL 2026-2027 GRA NSEB IR-20 Attachment 1 Page 37 of 40 - 1 NS Power is committed to proactively communicating progress on reliability improvements and - 2 any adjustments to our strategi...

AI summary NS Power is committed to transparent communication about reliability improvements and exploring partnerships for resilience investments, including undergrounding. The company hopes the Five-Year Reliability Plan and related regulatory process will engage stakeholders on grid reliability, resilience to climate change, and balancing performance with costs.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL - 1 Conditions for the projects above to be successfully developed include: - 2 Timely procurement, completion and commissioning of renewable and new fast-acting 3 generation projects. - 4 Successful regulatory approvals a...

AI summary The text outlines conditions for the successful development of renewable and fast-acting generation projects, emphasizing regulatory approvals, stakeholder support, supply chain reliability, and talent availability. NS Power is also considering fuel switching of coal units to meet capacity needs and reduce SO2 emissions post-2030.

3 (b) There remain a number of issues to be resolved before the transition can occur, including 4 completion of compliance related registrations, finalization of people transfer and 5 operational arrangements, and continued coordination am...

AI summary The text outlines ongoing issues to be resolved before a transition can occur, including compliance registrations, personnel transfers, and operational arrangements. The parties are working collaboratively, but the timing of the transition remains uncertain and depends on resolving several developing factors.

10-Year System Outlook (10YSO) NS Power's Ten-Year System Outlook (10YSO) assesses system generation capacity, considering load forecasts, planned generation additions, and environmental regulations, while adhering to the Nova Scotia Whole...

AI summary NS Power's Ten-Year System Outlook (10YSO) evaluates the system's generation capacity, taking into account load forecasts, planned generation additions, and environmental regulations. It is submitted to the NSUARB and involves stakeholder engagement processes.

General Rate Application (GRA) As a regulated entity, NS Power must obtain approval from the NSUARB to change the rates charged to its Customers for the services it provides them. NS Power's GRA includes many components including anticipat...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power (NS Power) must seek approval from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) to change its rates. The General Rate Application (GRA) includes components like fuel costs, operating expenses, depreciation, capital structure, and revenue requirements, and is subject to stakeholder engagement processes.

Response to NSPI (BW) IR-10 (b). 1 weighted-average cost of capital, which is currently 6.66%.24 NSPI expects to incur 2 interest expense on the deferral of $1.0 million in 2026 and $1.3 million.25 3 Q. Does the 2026-2027 GRA Application h...

AI summary NSPI has received support from customer representatives for its 2026-2027 GRA Application, following an extensive collaborative process that led to a settlement agreement involving various customer advocates and municipal electric utilities.

D. PARTIES AND INTERVENORS The Authority recognized the following as parties to this proceeding: UI, 180 Marsh Hill Road, Orange, CT 06477; the Office of Consumer Counsel (OCC), Ten Franklin Square, New Britain, CT 06051; the Authority's O...

AI summary The document lists the parties and intervenors in the proceeding, including UI, the Office of Consumer Counsel, the Authority's Office of Education, Outreach, and Enforcement, and the Commissioner of the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. Intervenor status was granted to several organizations, including the Connecticut Office of the Attorney General and Connecticut Industrial Energy Consumers.

Late Filed Ex. 71, Att. 4. The use of a load-carrying capacity is consistent with the NARUC Manual cited by the Company and CIEC, which states that "[w]hen using this distribution method, the analyst must be aware that the minimum-size dis...

AI summary The document discusses the use of load-carrying capacity in cost allocation, referencing the NARUC Manual and ACOSS models. The Authority directs the Company to adopt modified ACOSS models and refine load-carrying capacity adjustments with stakeholder input, including recommendations from UI and OCC.

onstraint from 75% to 50%. Ex. UI-RP-1, p. 15. Although this approach violated the Authority's 125%/75% rule, it achieved closer ROR parity among customer classes compared to the unadjusted model. Id. UI asserts that its use of the 1CP and...

AI summary The document discusses the allocation of costs in a regulatory proceeding, focusing on the use of different allocators (1CP and NCP) in the ACOSS model. UI argues that these allocators reflect industry standards and are simpler to use, while OCC recommends alternative allocators for substations and primary feeders. The discussion also touches on the need for stakeholder engagement and the relevance of the NARUC Manual from 1992 in light of modern technologies like AMI.

or an external system integrator until a full year after the 22-08-08 Decision, which, in light of the existing billing system's limitations, does not reflect expert, efficient, or prudent management. On July 1, 2025, Governor Ned Lamont s...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation of time-of-use (TOU) rates in light of new legislation, Public Act No. 25-173, which mandates filings by EDCs by October 1, 2027. It emphasizes the need for neutral revenue-neutral end-state rates, stakeholder engagement, and a revised methodology for allocating substation and feeder costs across on-peak and off-peak periods.

operations. Hr'g Tr., 474:17–21. Goal owners collect and coordinate information across UI's business functions to assess progress and determine next steps when goals fall off track. Hr'g Tr., 475:2–7. Avangrid's CEO and CFO review these up...

AI summary The document discusses the lack of specific sustainability goals and governance structures at the operating company level for ESG initiatives. While Avangrid has broader ESG objectives, UI does not have defined sustainability goals or mechanisms to ensure consistent implementation or oversight of ESG objectives. The alignment of these goals with Connecticut-specific ESG policies is also unclear.

RA or state-directed frameworks. The Company does not distinguish which programs are discretionary versus required, limiting the Authority's ability to assess the extent of UI's proactive involvement. Regarding stakeholder engagement, the...

AI summary The Company does not clearly differentiate between discretionary and required programs, limiting the Authority's ability to evaluate UI's proactive involvement. Stakeholder engagement includes ESG discussions, but lacks specific examples or frequency data. Avangrid collaborates with local teams and incorporates state-level clean energy goals into its carbon neutrality strategy.

To provide a broader view of workforce diversity, the Company submitted employee race and ethnicity data. Interrog. Resp. UPA-035, Att. 1. UI maintained a 141 On April 30, 2025, the Authority denied the Company's request for a motion of pr...

AI summary The Company submitted employee race and ethnicity data to provide a broader view of workforce diversity. The Authority denied the Company's request for a motion of protective order to keep the data confidential and directed the Company to refile the response. The data shows a predominantly white workforce in both 2023 and 2024.

essments, safety training, and change management. Id. The Company promotes employee participation through programs such as the Good Catch Program, which encourages proactive hazard identification. Id. To gather feedback, Avangrid consults...

AI summary Avangrid promotes employee participation in EHS through programs like the Good Catch Program and collaborates with union representatives and the Skilled Safety team. Training follows the ADDIE model and includes metrics like Net Promoter Scores. Cybersecurity training includes mandatory courses and phishing simulations, supported by cross-functional working groups.

- 16. In its next rate amendment application, the Company shall specifically identify any proposed rate base inclusion of completed plant that is not yet used and useful, as discussed in Section , . For any proposed inclusion in rate base...

AI summary The Company is required to clarify the inclusion of unused and unuseful plant in the rate base, justify any special circumstances for such inclusion, and refine load-carrying capacity adjustment values in consultation with the Office of Consumer Counsel. Additionally, the Company must continue calculating the ESM with a 50/50 split between ratepayers and shareholders for over-earning above the allowed ROE.

Submissions Submissions were made by the Three Fires Group Inc. and Minogi Corp. (TFG/Minogi), as well as the Caldwell First Nation (CFN) and Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation (CFN/MCFN). Three proposals were made by TFG/Minogi, whic...

AI summary Submissions were made by TFG/Minogi and CFN/MCFN regarding risk premiums, WACC, and concurrent cost recovery for Indigenous equity participation and large projects. CFN/MCFN emphasized the need for engagement with First Nations and addressing their unique interests in the OEB's cost of capital policies.

STAKEHOLDER RELATIONSHIPS Successful adaptation is impossible without the cooperation of all stakeholders, both internal and external. For this initial adaptation plan, Hydro-Québec has focused on its own assets and activities while contin...

AI summary Hydro-Québec emphasizes the importance of stakeholder cooperation for successful adaptation, focusing on its own assets and activities while engaging with municipalities, government bodies, Indigenous communities, and other energy companies to share best practices and improve its adaptation plan.

1.2.1 Consultation Process On July 20, 2005, Board staff held a public meeting to review the planned consultation process, amongst other items. Written submissions were received and considered. Following the release of the present Staff di...

AI summary The consultation process for the rate proceeding involved public meetings, written submissions, and the formation of a Technical Advisory Team. The team met in three phases focusing on cost allocation, rate design, and OEB filing requirements. Technical workshops and stakeholder discussions were organized, and funding was provided for eligible parties. Data availability was a key consideration in determining mandatory filing requirements.

Load Data Case Study The Report indicated that Hydro One Brampton Inc. may be willing to act as a case study in which existing Province-wide load data would be used, along with other information, to produce distributor-specific load profil...

AI summary The Report suggests Hydro One Brampton Inc. may serve as a case study for developing distributor-specific load profiles using province-wide load data. The methodology could be of interest to stakeholders, and Board staff will review the feasibility of facilitating the case study during consultations.

1.3 Preliminary Technical and Modeling Discussions A Technical Advisory Team (see Appendix 1.2) consisting of stakeholders representing large, medium and small distributors, as well as ratepayer groups, was established and met to provide t...

AI summary A Technical Advisory Team and public workshops were established to provide input on policy, implementation, and modeling issues. The Board acknowledges stakeholder contributions to the consultation process.

/͘ /^>/DZ dŚŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚŝƐƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚ ĨŽƌEŽǀĂ^ĐŽƚŝĂWŽǁĞƌ/ŶĐ͘ ;ƚŚĞ͞ůŝĞŶƚ͟ͿďLJ :͘͘zĂƚĞƐŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ>ŝŵŝƚĞĚ ;ƚŚĞ ͞ŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚ͟ͿĂŶĚŝƐƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐůŝŵŝƚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƋƵĂůŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚĚŝƐĐůĂŝŵĞƌƐ͗ - ϭ͘Ϳ dŚŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚŝƐƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚƐŽůĞůLJĨŽƌƚŚĞĞdžĐůƵƐŝǀĞƵƐĞŽĨƚŚĞů...

AI summary The document discusses regulatory issues related to energy efficiency, cost recovery, and stakeholder engagement in Nova Scotia. It addresses topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, demand-side management, and the integration of renewable energy resources. The proceedings involve considerations of affordability, program evaluation, and stakeholder participation in regulatory decisions.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ x dŚĞĂĐĐƵƌĂĐLJŽĨƚŚĞĐŽŵƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞŝŶƉƵƚĂŶĚŽƵƚƉƵƚƐƚƌĞĂŵƐ͘ &Žƌ ƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁĞĂƌĞĂĚĚƌĞƐƐŝŶŐϯϭŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞƐŝƚĞƐĂŶĚ ƚŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞϯϭŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƉƌŽ...

AI summary The document discusses the NSURB's proceedings regarding the regulation of utility rates and the implementation of energy efficiency programs. It focuses on the challenges and considerations in managing energy efficiency initiatives, including the impact of fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms and the integration of demand-side management strategies. The analysis highlights the importance of stakeholder engagement and regulatory oversight in ensuring equitable and effective program implementation.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ ŝƐƐƵĞƐǁŝůůĞdžŝƐƚǁŚŝĐŚǁŽƵůĚĂĚǀĞƌƐĞůLJĂĨĨĞĐƚĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͘ůůĨŝƐŚĞƌŝĞƐƌĞůĂƚĞĚŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂƚ ĞĂĐŚƐŝƚĞǁŝůůďĞƌĞŵŽǀĞĚďLJŽƚŚĞƌƐĞdžĐĞƉƚǁŚĞƌĞƐƉĞĐŝ...

AI summary This document discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency, demand-side management, and stakeholder engagement. It outlines the role of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSURB) and Nova Scotia Power (NSP) in managing energy programs, stakeholder participation, and ensuring equitable access to energy services. Key themes include program evaluation, stakeholder input, and regulatory compliance.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ - x /ŶƐƚĂůůƐŝůƚ͕ĚĞďƌŝƐĂŶĚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĐŽŶƚĂŝŶŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌLJƐĞĐƵƌŝƚLJĨĞŶĐŝŶŐ;ĐŚĂŝŶͲůŝŶŬͿ͕ƐŝůƚĨĞŶĐĞ͕Ɛŝůƚ ĐƵƌƚĂŝŶĂŶĚŽŝůŵ͘ - x ZĞŵŽǀĂůŽĨĂĐĐĞƐƐŝď...

AI summary The document discusses various regulatory and operational issues related to energy management, including the need for updated programs, stakeholder engagement, and the evaluation of energy efficiency initiatives. It highlights concerns around program effectiveness, compliance, and the importance of stakeholder input in decision-making processes.

ZŝĚŐĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ ŝŶ ϭϵϱϳ͕ ƚŚĞ ZŝĚŐĞ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƉůĂŶƚ ŚĂƌŶĞƐƐĞƐ ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJ ϭϰϬ ĨĞĞƚ ŽĨ ŚĞĂĚ ĂŶĚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ ϯ͘Ϭ Dt ŽĨ ĞůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂů ŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ ĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ ĨƌŽŵ Ă ƐŝŶŐůĞ ǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƵŶŝƚ͘ dŚĞ ƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞ ĐĂŶ ďĞ ĂĐĐĞƐƐĞĚ ǀŝĂ ƚŚĞƉĂǀĞ...

AI summary The document discusses the ZŝĚŐĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ proceeding, focusing on the history and structure of the ZŝĚŐĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ from 1957, including the role of the NSURB and the implementation of the ZŽĂĚ mechanism. It highlights the importance of the ZŽĂĚ mechanism in managing fuel costs and its impact on rate structures and stakeholder engagement.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ x KƵƚůĞƚ;ƌĂĨƚͲƚƵďĞͿůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶʹĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ͕ƚŚĞƚĂŝůƌĂĐĞĐŚĂŶŶĞůǁŝůůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƌĞŵĞĚŝĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞŽƌŝŐŝŶĂů ĞĂƌZŝǀĞƌĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚ͘ - x ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŵĂƚĞƌŝ...

AI summary The document discusses various aspects of Nova Scotia Power's operations, including fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, energy-efficiency programs, and regulatory processes. It covers topics such as cost-recovery, demand-side-management, and regulatory compliance, with a focus on program evaluations and stakeholder engagement.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ - x /ŶĨŝůů ĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ ƐƵďƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĞdžĐĂǀĂƚŝŽŶ ǁŝƚŚ ĐŽŵƉĂĐƚĞĚ ŐƌĂŶƵůĂƌ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů ĂŶĚ ƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚ ĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶ ĚĞďƌŝƐƚŽƚŚĞƚĂŝůƌĂĐĞĐŽĨĨĞƌĚĂŵ͘dŚĞĐŽĨĨĞƌĚ...

AI summary The text discusses the management of energy and utility regulations, emphasizing the importance of fair and effective policies, stakeholder engagement, and the implementation of energy efficiency measures. It highlights the need for accurate cost recovery mechanisms and the challenges in aligning rates with actual costs.

'ƵůĐŚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚŝŶϭϵϱϮŝŶƚŚĞdŽǁŶŽĨĞĂƌ ZŝǀĞƌ͕ ƚŚĞ 'ƵůĐŚ ƉůĂŶƚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJ ϲ͘ϬDt ĨƌŽŵ ϮϱϬ ĨĞĞƚ ŽĨ ŚĞĂĚ ǁŝƚŚ Ă ƐŝŶŐůĞ ǀĞƌƚŝĐĂů ƚƵƌďŽͲ ŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌƵŶŝƚ͘ dŚĞ ƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞ ŝƐ ůŽĐĂƚĞĚ Ăƚ ƚŚĞ ĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨZŝǀĞƌZŽĂĚĂŶĚWĂƌŬĞƌZŽĂĚ ŝŶƚŚĞdŽǁŶ...

AI summary The document discusses the 1952 regulation by ZŝǀĞƌZŽĂĚ, focusing on the implementation of the 'ƵůĐŚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ' mechanism. It highlights the challenges and considerations in applying this regulation, including issues related to cost recovery, program evaluation, and stakeholder engagement.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ - x /ŶƐƚĂůůƐŝůƚ͕ĚĞďƌŝƐĂŶĚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĐŽŶƚĂŝŶŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌLJƐĞĐƵƌŝƚLJĨĞŶĐŝŶŐ;ĐŚĂŝŶͲůŝŶŬͿ͕ƐŝůƚĨĞŶĐĞ͕Ɛŝůƚ ĐƵƌƚĂŝŶĂŶĚŽŝůŵ͘ - x ZĞŵŽǀĂůŽĨĂĐĐĞƐƐŝď...

AI summary The text discusses various regulatory and operational issues in Nova Scotia's energy sector, including challenges with fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, demand-side management, and the integration of renewable energy. It also touches on program evaluations, stakeholder engagement, and the need for policy reforms.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ - x ŝƐƉŽƐĂů ŽĨ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶ ĚĞďƌŝƐ ʹ ƚƌƵĐŬ ƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů ƚŽ ŶŶĂƉŽůŝƐ Žƌ ,ĂůŝĨĂdž ĨŽƌ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĚĞďƌŝƐĚŝƐƉŽƐĂů͕ǁŚŝůĞƐƵŝƚĂďů...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation of energy efficiency programs, the evaluation of cost recovery mechanisms, and the impact of regulatory decisions on program design and customer affordability. It also highlights the need for stakeholder engagement and the importance of aligning program goals with broader policy objectives.

,ŽůůŽǁƌŝĚŐĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚŝŶϭϵϰϬ͕,ŽůůŽǁƌŝĚŐĞŝƐĨĞĚ ĨƌŽŵ ƚŚĞ ƵƉƐƚƌĞĂŵ ƐƚŽƌĂŐĞ ŽĨ ůĂĐŬ ZŝǀĞƌ>ĂŬĞǀŝĂĂƚǁŝŶƐůŝĚŝŶŐŐĂƚĞĂƚƚŚĞ ,ŽůůŽǁ ƌŝĚŐĞ WŽǁĞƌ ĂŶĂů ŝŶůĞƚ͘ dŚĞ ƉŽǁĞƌ ĐĂŶĂů ŝƐ ĂďŽƵƚ ŽŶĞ ĂŶĚ Ă ŚĂůĨ ŵŝůĞƐ ůŽŶŐ ĂŶĚ ŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞƐ ĂŶ ŝŶƚĂŬĞ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌ...

AI summary The document discusses the historical context of Nova Scotia Power's rate proceedings, including the implementation of the fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism and the impact on rate structures. It highlights the role of the Board in regulatory decisions and the importance of stakeholder engagement in the process.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ ĨŝůƚĞƌƐ ĂŶĚ ƌĞůĂƚĞĚ ƉŝƉŝŶŐ͕ ƚŚƌŽƚƚůĞ ůŝŶŬĂŐĞ ĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͕ ĞůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂů ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĐĂďůĞƐ ĂŶĚ ŵŝƐĐĞůůĂŶĞŽƵƐƐŵĂůůĞƌĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƉŝƉŝŶŐ͘ - x Z...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory issues related to energy efficiency programs, cost recovery mechanisms, and stakeholder engagement in Nova Scotia. It highlights the need for proper implementation of programs, evaluation of performance, and ensuring affordability and equity in energy services. Key topics include program evaluation, cost recovery, and stakeholder participation.

tŚŝƚĞZŽĐŬĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ ŝŶ ϭϵϱϮ͕ ƚŚĞ tŚŝƚĞ ZŽĐŬ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŝƐ ĐŽŵƉƌŝƐĞĚ ŽĨ Ă ƐŝŶŐůĞ ǀĞƌƚŝĐĂů ƵŶŝƚ ǁŝƚŚ ŽƵƚƉƵƚ ĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ ŽĨ ĂďŽƵƚ ϯ͘Ϯ Dt ĨƌŽŵ ĂďŽƵƚ ϱϴ ĨĞĞƚ ŽĨ ŚĞĂĚ͘ dŚĞ ƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞ ŝƐ ĨĞĚ ďLJ Ă ĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚ ĞdžƉŽƐĞĚ &ZW ƉĞŶƐƚŽĐŬ ƉŝƉĞ ǁŝƚŚ...

AI summary The text discusses the Nova Scotia Power (NSP) tŚŝƚĞ ZŽĐŬ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ, which is a regulatory proceeding related to a 1952 agreement. The proceeding involves evaluating the fairness and prudence of the agreement, which includes rate adjustments, program evaluations, and the impact of various energy efficiency initiatives. It also touches on the role of the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act and the importance of stakeholder engagement.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ ĨŝůƚĞƌƐ ĂŶĚ ƌĞůĂƚĞĚ ƉŝƉŝŶŐ͕ ƚŚƌŽƚƚůĞ ůŝŶŬĂŐĞ ĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͕ ĞůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂů ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ ĐĂďůĞƐ ĂŶĚ ŵŝƐĐĞůůĂŶĞŽƵƐƐŵĂůůĞƌĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƉŝƉŝŶŐ͘ - x ZĞŵŽǀĂůŽĨ...

AI summary The document outlines various regulatory and operational considerations related to energy efficiency programs, affordability, and stakeholder engagement. It discusses topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, demand-side management programs, and the importance of stakeholder participation in regulatory processes.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ - x /ŶƐƚĂůůƐŝůƚ͕ĚĞďƌŝƐĂŶĚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĐŽŶƚĂŝŶŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌLJƐĞĐƵƌŝƚLJĨĞŶĐŝŶŐ;ĐŚĂŝŶͲůŝŶŬͿ͕ƐŝůƚĨĞŶĐĞ͕Ɛŝůƚ ĐƵƌƚĂŝŶĂŶĚŽŝůŵ͘ - x ZĞŵŽǀĂůŽĨĂĐĐĞƐƐŝď...

AI summary The text discusses various aspects of regulatory proceedings, including energy efficiency programs, affordability, and stakeholder engagement. It addresses concerns about program effectiveness, stakeholder participation, and the need for transparent and equitable energy policies. Key themes include energy efficiency, affordability, and stakeholder involvement.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ &ŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝnjĂƚŝŽŶƐĂƉƉůLJƚŽƚŚĞǀŽŶEŽ͘ϮĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJ͗ - x /ŶƚĂŬĞůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶͲĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ͕ƉĞŶƐƚŽĐŬƉŝƉĞŝƐďƵƌŝĞĚďĞůŽǁŐƌŽƵŶĚ͖ - x ƌ...

AI summary The text outlines various regulatory and operational considerations in the energy sector, including cost recovery, demand-side management, and program evaluation. It highlights challenges related to fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, asset management, and stakeholder engagement. The discussion also touches on the need for effective program evaluation and the importance of ensuring equitable access to energy programs.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ x KƵƚůĞƚ ;ƌĂĨƚͲƚƵďĞͿ ůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ ʹ ĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ͕ Ă ůĞŶŐƚŚLJ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚ ƚĂŝůƌĂĐĞ ĐŚĂŶŶĞů ǁŝůů ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞ ƌĞŵĞĚŝĂƚŝŽŶ͘ - x /ŶƐƚĂůůƐŝůƚ͕ĚĞďƌŝƐĂŶĚĞŶǀŝ...

AI summary The document discusses various aspects of energy regulation and management, including the implementation of energy efficiency programs, cost recovery mechanisms, and stakeholder engagement. It highlights the importance of ensuring equitable access to energy and the need for effective program evaluation and compliance with regulatory standards.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ x KƵƚůĞƚ ;ƌĂĨƚͲƚƵďĞͿ ůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ ʹ ĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ͕ Ă ůĞŶŐƚŚLJ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚ ƚĂŝůƌĂĐĞ ĐŚĂŶŶĞů ǁŝůů ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞ ƌĞŵĞĚŝĂƚŝŽŶ͘ - x /ŶƐƚĂůůƐŝůƚ͕ĚĞďƌŝƐĂŶĚĞŶǀŝ...

AI summary The text outlines various issues and considerations within a regulatory proceeding, including the evaluation of energy efficiency and conservation mechanisms, the impact of fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, and the discussion of cost-recovery and affordability concerns. It also touches on the need for stakeholder engagement and the evaluation of programs and policies.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ - x ŝƐƉŽƐĂůŽĨĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶĚĞďƌŝƐʹƚƌƵĐŬƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ ƚŽĂĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚĞĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ ĚĞďƌŝƐĚŝƐƉŽƐĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJ͕ǁŚŝůĞƐƵŝƚĂďůĞŽƚŚĞƌŵĂƚĞƌŝĂ...

AI summary The document discusses the need for regulatory oversight in energy management, emphasizing the importance of accurate cost recovery mechanisms and the challenges associated with aligning base rates with actual costs. It highlights the role of energy efficiency programs and the need for stakeholder engagement in the regulatory process.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ ĐŚĂŵďĞƌ͕ĂŶĚůŽǁĞƌĚƌĂĨƚͲƚƵďĞŽƵƚůĞƚƚŽƚŚĞƚĂŝůƌĂĐĞĐŚĂŶŶĞů͘dŚĞŚĞĂĚŐĂƚĞƐĂƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶƐŝĚĞ ƚŚĞ ƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŝŶĂ ĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶǁŚŝĐŚ ŝƐ ƌĞŵĂƌŬĂďůLJ...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation of a regulatory proceeding concerning energy efficiency and conservation, including the evaluation of mechanisms, stakeholder involvement, and the impact of various programs. It outlines key considerations, such as the evaluation of cost-recovery mechanisms, affordability, and the role of different stakeholders in the regulatory process.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ - x ZĞŵŽǀĂů ŽĨ ,s ĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ ĂŶĚ ůŽĐĂůŝnjĞĚ ŚĞĂƚŝŶŐ ƵŶŝƚƐ ĨŽƌ ĂƌĞĂƐ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŽƐĞ ŚĞĂƚĞƌƐƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐĂůůLJƉůĂĐĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂƐƐŝƐƚ...

AI summary The text discusses various aspects of energy efficiency and conservation in Nova Scotia, including the implementation of programs, stakeholder engagement, and regulatory considerations. It highlights challenges in aligning rate structures with actual costs, the importance of stakeholder input, and the evaluation of energy efficiency initiatives.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ x KƵƚůĞƚ ;ƌĂĨƚͲƚƵďĞͿ ůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ ʹ ĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ͕ Ă ůĞŶŐƚŚLJ ĂŶĚ ďƌŽĂĚ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚ ƚĂŝůƌĂĐĞ ĐŚĂŶŶĞů ǁŝůů ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƌĞŵĞĚŝĂƚŝŽŶ͘ - x ŽŶƐƚƌ...

AI summary The text discusses various aspects of energy efficiency and conservation in Nova Scotia, including mechanisms for managing energy costs, programs for residential and commercial energy use, and regulatory processes. It highlights the importance of addressing energy consumption patterns, stakeholder engagement, and ensuring equitable access to energy programs.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ - x /ŶĨŝůů ĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ ƐƵďƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĞdžĐĂǀĂƚŝŽŶ ǁŝƚŚ ĐŽŵƉĂĐƚĞĚ ŐƌĂŶƵůĂƌ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů ĂŶĚ ƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚ ĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶ ĚĞďƌŝƐƚŽƚŚĞƚĂŝůƌĂĐĞĐŽĨĨĞƌĚĂŵ͘dŚĞĐŽĨĨĞƌĚ...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation of energy efficiency and conservation initiatives under the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act Nova Scotia, emphasizing the need for accurate cost recovery mechanisms, stakeholder engagement, and program evaluation. Key considerations include program effectiveness, affordability, and regulatory oversight.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ ĚŝǀĞƌƐŝŽŶƉĂƐƚƚŚĞƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƚŽĂǀŽŝĚƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůĞƌŽƐŝŽŶĂŶĚůŽĐĂů ĨůŽŽĚŝŶŐƉƌŽďůĞŵƐ ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŚĂǀŝŶŐƚŚĞƌŝǀĞƌĨůŽǁƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĂĨŝůůĞĚĂƌĞĂůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶƚ...

AI summary The text discusses various aspects of energy efficiency and conservation in Nova Scotia, including mechanisms, programs, and stakeholder engagement. It outlines key themes such as fuel-cost-adjustment, energy-efficiency, and stakeholder participation in regulatory processes.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ - x ZĞŵŽǀĞ ĞdžƉŽƐĞĚ ŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌ ƐƚĞĞů ƉĂƌƚƐ͖ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ƚŚƌŽĂƚ ƌŝŶŐ͕ ƐƚĞĞů ĚƌĂĨƚͲƚƵďĞ ƉĂƌƚƐ ĂŶĚ ŽƚŚĞƌ ƌĞůĂƚĞĚ ŵŝƐĐĞůůĂŶĞŽƵƐŝƚĞŵƐ͘^ƚŽĐŬƉŝůĞĂŶĚƐŽƌƚĨŽ...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory issues in Nova Scotia's energy sector, focusing on topics such as energy efficiency, cost recovery mechanisms, and stakeholder engagement. It touches on the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act, program evaluations, and the importance of stakeholder participation in regulatory decisions.

WĂƌĂĚŝƐĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚŝŶϭϵϱϬĂƚWĂƌĂĚŝƐĞƌŽŽŬ͕Ăƚ ƚŚĞ ƚŽĞŽĨ ƚŚĞ^ŽƵƚŚDŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ͕ĂĐƌŽƐƐ ƚŚĞŶŶĂƉŽůŝƐ ZŝǀĞƌĂŶĚƐŽƵƚŚǁĞƐƚŽĨWĂƌĂĚŝƐĞŝŶŶŶĂƉŽůŝƐŽƵŶƚLJ͕ƚŚĞWĂƌĂĚŝƐĞƉůĂŶƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂďŽƵƚϱ͘ϬDt ĨƌŽŵĂƐŝŶŐůĞǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůůLJŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŶŐƵŶŝƚĂƚĂďŽƵƚϰϲϯĨĞĞƚŽĨŚĞĂ...

AI summary The document discusses the impact of the fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism on rate structures and the need for regulatory oversight. It highlights concerns regarding the alignment of base rates with actual costs, the role of the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act, and the need for stakeholder engagement in the regulatory process.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ - x ZĞŵŽǀĂů ŽĨ ,s ĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ ĂŶĚ ůŽĐĂůŝnjĞĚ ŚĞĂƚŝŶŐ ƵŶŝƚƐ ĨŽƌ ĂƌĞĂƐ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŽƐĞ ŚĞĂƚĞƌƐƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐĂůůLJƉůĂĐĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂƐƐŝƐƚ...

AI summary The document discusses various aspects of energy regulation, including fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act, and the management of energy resources and programs. It emphasizes the need for effective regulation, the importance of stakeholder engagement, and the challenges associated with implementing energy efficiency initiatives.

ZŽƐĞǁĂLJĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ dŚĞZŽƐĞǁĂLJĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƚƵƌďŽͲŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌƐĂƌĞĨĞĚǀŝĂĂƚǁŝŶŶĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞŚĞĂĚǁŽƌŬƐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ǁŝƚŚƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚŐĂƚĞĚŝŶůĞƚƐĨŽƌĞĂĐŚƵŶŝƚĂƚƚŚĞƉŽǁĞƌĐĂŶĂůĨŽƌĞďĂLJ͘ĂĐŚƵŶŝƚŝƐĨĞĚďLJ ŝƚƐŽǁŶƉĞŶƐƚŽĐŬƉŝƉĞƐ͕ǁŚŝĐŚƌĞŵĂŝŶƉĂƌƚůLJĞdžƉŽƐĞĚĂƚƚŚĞƵƉƐƚƌ...

AI summary The document discusses the historical context and regulatory proceedings related to ZŽƐĞǁĂLJĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ, including past proceedings from 1931 to 1969, and outlines various topics such as the structure of regulatory processes, the role of the Board, and the management of energy efficiency and conservation programs. It highlights key issues such as the need for a comprehensive approach to regulation and the importance of stakeholder engagement.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ ĞƉĞŶĚŝŶŐ ŽŶ ďĞĚƌŽĐŬ ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͕ ƚŚĞƌĞ ŵĂLJ ďĞ ůŝŵŝƚĞĚ ƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂů Ăƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐŝƚĞ ĨŽƌ ďƵƌLJŝŶŐ ĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶŐĞŶĞƌĂƚĞĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͘ &ŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶ...

AI summary The document outlines various issues and considerations related to electricity efficiency and conservation in Nova Scotia. It discusses topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, demand-side-management programs, and the impact of policy changes on energy consumption and affordability. Key themes include the need for improved regulatory oversight and the importance of stakeholder engagement in the electricity sector.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ - x ZĞŵŽǀĞĞdžƉŽƐĞĚŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌƐƚĞĞůƉĂƌƚƐ͖ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚŚƌŽĂƚƌŝŶŐ͕ŚĞĂĚĐŽǀĞƌ͕ƐƚĞĞůĚƌĂĨƚͲƚƵďĞƉĂƌƚƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌ ƌĞůĂƚĞĚŵŝƐĐĞůůĂŶĞŽƵƐŝƚĞŵƐ͘^ƚŽĐŬƉŝůĞĂŶĚƐŽƌƚĨŽƌƐĂ...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency, cost recovery, and stakeholder engagement in Nova Scotia. It outlines the need for stakeholder input, the evaluation of energy efficiency programs, and the importance of aligning policies with long-term energy goals. The text also touches on the role of the Board in ensuring equitable and effective program implementation.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ - x ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůůĂLJͲĚŽǁŶĂƌĞĂĂƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘ - x /ŶƐƚĂůůƐŝůƚ͕ĚĞďƌŝƐĂŶĚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĐŽŶƚĂŝŶŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌLJƐĞĐƵƌŝƚLJĨĞŶĐŝŶŐ;ĐŚĂŝŶͲůŝŶŬ...

AI summary The document discusses various aspects of energy regulation and management, including fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, demand-side-management programs, and the impact of regulatory decisions on utility operations and customer affordability. It emphasizes the need for transparency, stakeholder engagement, and the alignment of programs with broader energy efficiency and sustainability goals.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ - x ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶʹĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ͕ƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĂŶĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůƐƚĞĞů͖ - x KƵƚůĞƚ ;ƌĂĨƚͲƚƵďĞͿůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶʹĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ͕ƚŚĞĚƌĂĨƚͲƚƵďĞĚŝƐĐŚĂƌŐ...

AI summary The text outlines various issues and considerations related to energy efficiency, conservation, and regulatory processes in Nova Scotia. It discusses topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, demand-side management, and regulatory oversight. Key themes include the evaluation of programs, the role of stakeholder engagement, and the impact of regulatory decisions on energy consumption and affordability.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ - x /ŶĨŝůůĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐƵďƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĞdžĐĂǀĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚĐŽŵƉĂĐƚĞĚĐůĞĂŶŐƌĂŶƵůĂƌŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƚŽƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐƚĂŝůƌĂĐĞ ĐŽĨĨĞƌĚĂŵƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘dŚĞĐŽĨĨĞƌĚĂŵĐĂŶƌĞŵĂŝŶŽŶĐ...

AI summary The text discusses the application of the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act, the management of energy efficiency programs, and the evaluation of cost-effectiveness in utility proceedings. It references the importance of stakeholder engagement and regulatory oversight in ensuring fair and efficient energy practices.

ŽŽŶWŽŶĚĂŶĚ^ĂŶĚLJ>ĂŬĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ ŽŽŶ WŽŶĚ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ǁĂƐ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ ŝŶ ĂďŽƵƚϭϵϮϮĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĂďŽƵƚϭ͘ϮϱDtĨƌŽŵ ĞĂĐŚ ŽĨ ŝƚƐ ƚǁŽ ǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůůLJ ŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚ ƚƵƌďŽͲ ŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌ ƵŶŝƚƐ͘ /ŶĨůŽǁ ĨƌŽŵ ƚŚĞ WŽĐŬǁŽĐŬ >ĂŬĞƐLJƐƚĞŵŝƐĐŚĂŶŶĞůůĞĚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽŽŶWŽŶĚ ĂŶĚĂƉŝƉĞůŝ...

AI summary The document discusses the regulatory proceedings related to the Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act (E^W). It highlights the implementation of mechanisms such as the fuel-cost-adjustment and the evaluation of program effectiveness and stakeholder engagement in the proceedings.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ WŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞ ĂŶĚ ƐƵƌŐĞ ƚĂŶŬƐ ĂƌĞ ǀŝƐŝďůĞ ĨƌŽŵ ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJ ϭϬϯ͘ ĐĐĞƐƐ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞ ŝƐ ǀŝĂ ĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐŐƌĂǀĞůƚŽƉƉĞĚŽǁĂƚĞƌ͛ƐZŽĂĚƐŝŶƚŚĞdĂŶƚĂůůŽŶǀŝĐŝŶŝ...

AI summary The document discusses various aspects of regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia, including fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, energy efficiency programs, and stakeholder engagement. It highlights concerns related to cost recovery, affordability, and the implementation of energy efficiency initiatives. Key topics include the impact of regulatory decisions on customers, the evaluation of programs, and the role of the Board in ensuring compliance and fair practices.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ dŚĞdŝĚĞǁĂƚĞƌĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁĂƐĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚŝŶ ϭϵϮϮ ĂŶĚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ Ϯ͘Ϭ Dt ŽĨ ŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ ĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJĨƌŽŵĞĂĐŚŽĨŝƚƐƚǁŽǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůůLJŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚ ƚƵƌďŽͲŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌ ƵŶŝƚƐ...

AI summary The document discusses the regulation of energy efficiency and conservation in Nova Scotia, focusing on mechanisms such as the fuel-cost-adjustment, rate design, and affordability. It outlines the role of the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act and the importance of stakeholder engagement and program evaluation.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ - x ĞŵŽůŝƐŚĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌǁĂůůƐĂŶĚƌĞůĂƚĞĚĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͕ƐƚŽĐŬƉŝůĞĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůĨŽƌĚŝƐƉŽƐĂů͘ - x ZĞŵŽǀĞĂŶĚĚĞŵŽůŝƐŚŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌĨůŽŽƌƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐůĂď...

AI summary The text discusses the importance of accurate and timely regulation and management of energy efficiency and conservation programs, emphasizing the need for proper stakeholder engagement, program evaluation, and the alignment of incentives with policy goals. It highlights the challenges in implementing and monitoring such programs, as well as the need for effective oversight and compliance.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ ǁŝůů ďĞ ƌĞŵŽǀĞĚ ďLJ ŽƚŚĞƌƐ͘ /ƚ ŝƐ ĂůƐŽ ĂƐƐƵŵĞĚ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞƌĞ ǁŝůů ďĞ ŶŽ ŽƵƚƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐ ĂƐďĞƐƚŽƐ ĂďĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽƌŽƚŚĞƌŚĂnjĂƌĚŽƵƐŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐŽƌĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůŝƐƐ...

AI summary The text discusses the regulatory process and challenges in Nova Scotia's electricity sector, focusing on the implementation of energy efficiency and conservation measures, as well as the role of various stakeholders in ensuring compliance and effective policy execution. It highlights the need for stakeholder engagement, compliance, and oversight in managing energy resources and programs.

EKs^Kd/WKtZ/E͘Ͳ,zZKWZKhd/KE ^/dKDD/^^/KE/E'^d/Dd^hDDZz&KZ^^dZd/ZDEdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ ƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞ ŚĂƐ ďĞĞŶ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚ ŝƚ ǁŝůů ďĞ ŝŵƉƌĂĐƚŝĐĂů ƚŽ ĂƚƚĞŵƉƚ ƚŽ ĚĞŵŽůŝƐŚ ĂŶĚ ƌĞŵŽǀĞ ŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐĂŶĚŝŶĨŝůůƚŚĞ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJǁŝƚŚ...

AI summary The text discusses the need for regulatory oversight of Nova Scotia Power's fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism, addressing concerns over potential perverse incentives due to a lag between base rates and actual costs. It also highlights the importance of ensuring fair and equitable energy programs, stakeholder engagement, and compliance with regulatory standards and legislation.

s͘ WKtZ,Kh^DK>/d/KE^^hDDZzEKE>h^/KE^ ĞĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŝŶŐŽĨE^W/,LJĚƌŽWƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞƐǁŝůůďĞĂŶĞŶĚĞĂǀŽƌǁŚŝĐŚǁŝůůĚĞƉĞŶĚŚĞĂǀŝůLJ ŽŶ ĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚ ĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ ŽĨ ǀĂƌŝŽƵƐ ƚƌĂĚĞƐ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ďƵƚ ŶŽƚ ůŝŵŝƚĞĚ ƚŽ ŚĞĂǀLJͲůŝĨƚ ĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌƐ͕ ,s ƐƉĞĐŝĂůŝƐƚƐ͕ŵĞ...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings involving energy management, focusing on mechanisms like fuel-cost-adjustment and the impact of base rates on incentives. It references proceedings and mentions the need for stakeholder engagement and compliance with regulations.

xtent of the value of the property rence de la valeur des biens ainsi distribués. so distributed. DIVISION B SECTION B Partnerships Sociétés de personnes Partnerships Sociétés de personnes 33 (1) For the purposes of this Act, anything done...

AI summary This section of the legislation outlines the legal framework for partnerships, stating that actions taken by a member of a partnership are deemed to be actions of the partnership itself. It also establishes the joint and several liability of partnerships and their members for certain obligations.

the Act is replaced by the fol- 224 L’article 21 de la même loi est remplacé par lowing: ce qui suit : Other committees Autres comités 21 The Board may, subject to the regulations, establish 21 Le conseil peut, sous réserve des règlements,...

AI summary The text outlines amendments to the legislation regarding the establishment of committees and the creation of a Stakeholder Advisory Council, which will be independent of the Association and its members, appointed by the Board in consultation with the Minister.

This document describes the plan for administering Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NS Power) Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FAM), which was approved by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (as of April 1, 2025 referred to as the Nova Scotia Ener...

AI summary This document outlines the administration plan for NS Power's Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FAM), approved by the Nova Scotia Energy Board. The FAM allows for the recovery of fuel and purchased power costs, with the Base Cost of Fuel being reset periodically through General Rate Applications or Board orders. Stakeholders can challenge the methodology and forecasts, and the Board will audit the FAM accounts. Adjustments are calculated based on the difference between actual and base fuel costs.

6.0 STAKEHOLDER REVIEW AND DISCOVERY Monthly, quarterly and annual non-confidential and confidential reporting will be available for access and viewing. NS Power confidential reporting will be available electronically or in a confidential...

AI summary The document outlines the process for stakeholder access to NS Power's reporting, including both confidential and non-confidential information. It specifies that stakeholders will have the opportunity to review and challenge fuel cost forecasts and related methodologies during hearings, similar to their rights in General Rate Cases.

6.0 STAKEHOLDER REVIEW AND DISCOVERY Monthly, quarterly and annual non-confidential and confidential reporting will be available for access and viewing. NS Power confidential reporting will be available electronically or in a confidential...

AI summary Stakeholders will have access to both confidential and non-confidential reporting from NS Power, including monthly, quarterly, and annual reports. Confidential information will require a Confidentiality Agreement. Stakeholders will also have the opportunity to review and challenge fuel costs, methodology, and forecasts during hearings.

r Street Halifax, Nova Scotia Depending on the circumstances, this public hearing may be held by video conference. Board Hearings are open to the public and you may participate as follows: - You may listen to the live hearing by visiting t...

AI summary The document outlines procedures for a public hearing regarding NS Power's proposal, including participation methods, deadlines for speaking, submitting comments, and requesting intervenor status, with references to Matter No. M12451.

1.0 SUMMARY - [1] The Nova Scotia Energy Board is keenly aware that electricity rates are already challenging for many customers, and any rate increase will be difficult, especially for those with low or fixed incomes. However, the Board d...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board acknowledges the difficulty of electricity rate increases for low-income customers but lacks authority to set special rates under the Public Utilities Act. NS Power filed a GRA proposing 1.8%-4.1% rate increases for 2026-2027, with residential rates rising more sharply. The Board emphasizes its role in recovering prudently incurred costs, while NS Power claims the application resulted from collaborative negotiations with customer representatives.

[38] Previous decisions by the NSUARB set out the principles it applied in its consideration of settlement agreements. Those principles are still relevant and bear repeating. In its decision dated November 5, 2008, about a prior NS Power g...

AI summary The NSUARB emphasizes its commitment to ensuring that settlement agreements are just, reasonable, and in the public interest. It highlights the importance of settlement agreements in regulatory proceedings, noting their role in promoting collaboration and reducing controversy in rate applications. The Board also outlines its principles for evaluating such agreements, including the need to ensure that costs are prudently incurred and that all intervenor concerns are adequately addressed.

ty engagement with its present staffing complement, having conducted 65 community meetings recently across the province. The Board finds that adding more staff on these initiatives would be redundant. [98] Secondly, and more importantly, d...

AI summary The Board rejects NS Power's request for additional staffing for customer engagement, citing lack of formal customer satisfaction metrics and reliance on performance standards. NS Power failed to justify increased costs for digital programs and did not conduct a cost-benefit analysis for engagement initiatives.

ing them. So I would agree that there's a –– an inconsistency, perhaps, with traditional or normal utility practice if those were to be partially decommissioned and retained as assets of the utility. - Q. Right. If they were no longer used...

AI summary The discussion centers on the cost allocation for partially decommissioned utility assets. Williams notes inconsistencies in traditional utility practices, emphasizing that retaining large assets post-decommissioning may shift costs to ratepayers. He argues that while ratepayers might bear some costs, partial decommissioning could lower customer expenses, though not through direct service benefits.

3.4.6 Depreciation – Summary [268] For the purposes of the current GRA, the Board finds it appropriate to exclude decommissioning costs for the Wreck Cove, Mersey, and Tusket hydro systems from proposed depreciation rates for the 2026 and...

AI summary The Board excludes decommissioning costs for Wreck Cove, Mersey, and Tusket hydro systems from 2026-2027 depreciation rates but accepts partial decommissioning costs for other hydro assets. It directs NS Power to reconcile salvage data from 2009 onward and initiate stakeholder engagement on decommissioning policies. Net salvage rates for non-settlement agreement assets and three transmission/distribution accounts are approved.

3.5.1.2.1 Findings [314] The approval of the potential securitization is not before the Board in this application. The sole issue in the present matter is whether the Board should approve the securitization deferral. NS Power asked for thi...

AI summary The Board did not approve securitization but considered deferring depreciation and financing costs of thermal assets until 2026. Securitization is blocked by unproclaimed statutory provisions. The Consumer Advocate doubts securitization's feasibility without provincial support, though customer representatives support eventual securitization.

provided information about the engagement process it followed in developing the cost-of-service proposals it has put forward for approval. NS Power's summary of this process in its application stated: Throughout 2024, technical conferences...

AI summary NS Power detailed its engagement process for developing cost-of-service proposals, including technical conferences, Resolution Sessions mediated by Bruce Outhouse (KC), and extensive data exchanges. 67 models, 152 data requests, and supporting documents were compiled as appendices. The process aimed to streamline discussions under the General Rate Application (GRA) and received stakeholder approval for its transparency and information sharing.

3.8.1 Findings [584] For the purposes of setting rates in this proceeding, the Board accepts the proposed cost-of-service changes and the cost-of-service studies presented in this proceeding, except NS Power is directed to implement a load...

AI summary The Board accepts NS Power's cost-of-service studies but requires adjustments, including a load carrying capability adjustment. NS Power must address concerns from Ms. Palmer and Renewall, particularly regarding distribution cost allocation and OATT tariff issues. These adjustments are to be addressed in future applications.

ing the updated COSS would result in lower OATT costs per MW. This is false. As indicated above, the coincidence factors from 'Exhibit 9a Annual' are not relevant to the calculation of the OATT rates. As demonstrated above, the proposed OA...

AI summary NS Power disputes REI's claim that updating the Cost-of-Service Study (COSS) would lower OATT costs, asserting their OATT rate calculations are accurate and aligned with the 2024 stakeholder consultation. NS Power clarifies that COS inputs are not fully mirrored in OATT, with IESO Nova Scotia set to administer OATT post-implementation of the More Access to Energy Act .

SS and Line Loss Study discussed later in this decision, the Board approves the deferral of the costs of developing this plan for recovery through rates after NS Power's next general rate application. [2023 NSUARB 12] [703] NS Power filed...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) approves deferring costs of NS Power's Climate Change Adaptation Plan until its next general rate application. NS Power filed the plan, emphasizing a consultative process involving the Climate Adaptation Leadership Program. The plan focuses on climate data integration into asset management but lacks detailed vulnerability assessments or mitigation timelines.

4.3.1 Findings [707] The fact that NS Power compiles and analyzes climate data and uses this information in its asset management systems is positive. However, NS Power's Climate Change Adaptation Plan is more of a process than a plan per s...

AI summary The Board finds NS Power's Climate Change Adaptation Plan insufficient as it lacks transparency, stakeholder consultation, and detailed climate impact analysis. They direct a revision by October 1, 2026, incorporating elements like climate impact descriptions and adaptation measures.

- To provide a reconciliation showing the annual collection of interim and final net salvage in rates from 2009 onwards in its next depreciation study. This information is to be presented for actual interim salvage costs that have been inc...

AI summary NS Power is directed to reconcile salvage costs, consult on hydro plant decommissioning, update depreciation studies comparing ALG and ELG methodologies, and address asset retirement factors. The Board mandates detailed analysis of depreciation, retirement patterns, and regulatory compliance, with periodic reporting requirements.

6.0 STAKEHOLDER REVIEW AND DISCOVERY Monthly, quarterly and annual non-confidential and confidential reporting will be available for access and viewing. NS Power confidential reporting will be available electronically or in a confidential...

AI summary Stakeholders will have access to monthly, quarterly, and annual reports, including confidential data, to review and challenge NS Power's fuel costs and forecasting methodologies. Confidential information requires a confidentiality agreement, and reporting templates are available electronically. This applies to hearings regarding the Base Cost of Fuel and other settings.

- [12] The Board's Regulatory Rules facilitate settlement discussions. The Board welcomes and appreciates the efforts of parties to, in good faith, settle issues, even where, as sometimes happens, a settlement cannot be ultimately achieved...

AI summary The document discusses the regulatory process for Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 General Rate Application, emphasizing the Board's support for settlement discussions and the extensive evidence already filed by NSPI and other parties before the hearing. It highlights that the settlement process is in the public interest and that the Board has thoroughly reviewed the material in advance of a decision.

r Street Halifax, Nova Scotia Depending on the circumstances, this public hearing may be held by video conference. Board Hearings are open to the public and you may participate as follows: - You may listen to the live hearing by visiting t...

AI summary The document outlines procedures for participating in a public hearing related to NS Power's application. It provides details on how individuals can listen to the hearing, speak, submit written comments, or request formal standing as an intervenor. A deadline for submitting requests and evidence is also specified.

October 15, 2025 Crystal Henwood Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Energy Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: M12451 – 2026-2027 General Rate Application - Nova Scotia Power Incorporated comments on Preliminary Is...

AI summary NS Power provides comments on the 2026-2027 General Rate Application (GRA) Preliminary Issues List, emphasizing the collaborative process with customer representatives and the support for GRA outcomes. They argue that the Final Issues List should reflect the efficiencies achieved through this collaboration and avoid redundancy by focusing on unresolved issues requiring further evidence.

M12451 – Nova Scotia Power Incorporated – 2026 General Rate Application (GRA) On September 25, 2025, the Board issued a Hearing Order, Notice of Hearing and Draft Issues List for NS Power's application to set rates for 2026 and 2027. Follo...

AI summary The Board issued a Hearing Order for NS Power's 2026 GRA, with comments on the Draft Issues List due by October 15, 2025. NS Power, the only party to file detailed comments, argued most issues were resolved or unnecessary. The Board disagreed, noting unresolved matters. NS Power emphasized collaboration with customer representatives, who supported the GRA outcomes.

nors are adequately considered by the Board and the terms and conditions under which they consent to a settlement agreement are honoured. [NS Power 2007 GRA decision, 2007 NSUARB 8] [2023 NSUARB 12] The Board views NS Power's engagement wi...

AI summary The NSUARB commends NS Power for customer engagement but emphasizes that settlement agreements must ensure rates are just and reasonable. The Board requires a thorough evidentiary record before approving NS Power's pending general rate application, despite prior consensus efforts.

Collaborative and Consultative Processes NS Power noted that its Line Loss Study and its Cost-of-Service Study were undertaken through collaborative processes. These studies have an impact on NS Power's revenue requirement and how costs ar...

AI summary NS Power conducted collaborative studies impacting revenue and cost allocation, which the Board commends but clarifies do not prevent parties from challenging study findings in proceedings. Effective consultative processes may reduce controversy in related Board decisions.

Request IR-24: - Reference: N-6 2026-2027 GRA Direct Evidence Appendix 7C Page 15-16 of 58 - Per N-6, (Appendix 7C), page 15-16 of 58, we understand that consulting expense has increased - in 2026 forecast compared to 2024 compliance resta...

AI summary The document references Request IR-24, seeking a breakdown of increased consulting expenses in the 2026 forecast compared to 2024, attributed to greater regulatory engagements. The request cites N-6 2026-2027 GRA Direct Evidence Appendix 7C, pages 15-16 of 58.

Request IR-41: - Reference: N-6 2026-2027 GRA Direct Evidence Appendix 7C Page 43-44 of 58 - Per N-6, (Appendix 7C), page 43-44 of 58, we understand that labour expense has increased - from 2024 compliance restated to 2026 forecast for "re...

AI summary The document requests detailed information on the creation of NSPI's reliability implementation department and expansion of the Standards & Community Engagement team, citing increased labor expenses due to centralization of resources for system reliability. It asks for roles and salaries related to these changes.

Request IR-51: - Reference: N-6 2026-2027 GRA Direct Evidence Appendix 7C Page 53-54 of 58 - Per N-6, (Appendix 7C), page 53-54 of 58, we understand that labour has increased from 2024 - compliance restated and 2024 actual to 2026 forecast...

AI summary The document requests clarification on increased labor costs for grid modernization and customer integration from 2024 to 2026, citing additional resources in the Smart Meter Operations Center, data analytics, customer experience, Telecom, WAM support, and salary escalations. It asks for the number of additional resources, their salaries, and details on expanded customer-focused initiatives.

Request IR-52: - Reference: N-6 2026-2027 GRA Direct Evidence Appendix 7C Page 53-54 of 58 - Per N-6, (Appendix 7C), page 53-54 of 58, we understand that contracts have increased from - 2024 compliance restated and 2024 actual to 2026 fore...

AI summary The text requests supporting cost breakdowns for increased contracts related to grid modernization and customer integration from 2024 to 2026, citing increased requirements in customer experience, SMOC, Telecom, and customer engineering and innovation teams.

Request IR-1: Please file a copy of the consensus agreement reached with customer representatives.

AI summary The document requests the filing of a consensus agreement reached with customer representatives as part of a regulatory proceeding. The agreement is described as a formalized understanding between parties involved in the proceeding, though no specific terms or outcomes are detailed in the provided text.

Request IR-17: - Reference: Exhibit N-5, Appendix 3A, Status of GRA-Related Deliverables - In Item 3, NS Power notes that it created a Climate Change Adaptation Plan in 2021. - a) Please explain why, if NS Power had already created a Clima...

AI summary The Board requests NS Power to explain delays in submitting its Climate Change Adaptation Plan, provide deferred cost breakdowns, detail stakeholder engagements, clarify discrepancies in plan status, and explain the Climate Action Leadership Program. Additional requests concern climate data usage in risk analysis and holistic economic modeling for climate resilience measures.

Request IR-63: - Reference: Exhibit N-6(ii), Regulatory Affairs - The consulting expense forecast for 2026 is 57% higher than 2024 compliance and slightly below 2024 actuals. Board staff assumes that much of the work leading into the GRA w...

AI summary The consulting expense forecast for 2026 is 57% higher than 2024 compliance but slightly below 2024 actuals. Board staff assumes significant GRA-related work (e.g., depreciation, line loss studies) was completed in 2024. The request asks why expenses remain stable despite expecting greater regulatory work volume and scope in 2026-2027.

10 The Board Should Accept the Settlement Agreement 11 12 The GRA and the Settlement Agreement on which it is based are the product of months of 13 consultation among Nova Scotia Power and its Customer Representatives, supported by expert...

AI summary The Settlement Agreement and GRA resulted from extensive consultations between Nova Scotia Power, Customer Representatives, and expert consultants. All parties made concessions, and the Agreement received support from customer groups and expert reviews, which did not recommend its rejection. The Board is urged to accept the Agreement as just, reasonable, and in the public interest.

David MacDougall Direct +1 (902) 444 8561 Purdy's Wharf Tower II 1300-1969 Upper Water Street PO Box 730 Halifax NS Canada B3J 2V1 Tel +1 (902) 425 6500 Fax +1 (902) 425 6350 [email protected] January 30, 2026 Ms. Crystal Hen...

AI summary Port Hawkesbury Paper LP (PHP) submits closing remarks supporting approval of the Consensus Agreement for Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 General Rate Application (GRA). The agreement, reached through extensive collaboration, addresses most GRA issues, with only minor exceptions. PHP argues the Board should approve the Consensus Agreement as is, emphasizing its public interest alignment and the collaborative process, while opposing specific adjustments to the Cost of Service Study (COSS) and depreciation deferral timing.

1. The COSS Should Be Approved Consistent with the Consensus Agreement Prior to the current proceeding, NS Power's COSS has been subject to a full review only once since 1995. At paras. 56-57 of its November 29, 2011 decision approving NS...

AI summary NS Power's COSS has been reviewed periodically, with the Board directing updates in 2011 and 2022. The 2022 Settlement Agreement mandates a new COSS by 2025, reflecting developments like renewable integration, gas generation, and energy storage. The Board requires semi-annual progress reports starting 2024.

2. The Securitization Deferral Should Only Begin When New Rates Take Effect NS Power's GRA requests approval of revenue requirements for the utility and requests adjustments to electricity rates for 2026 and 2027, effective January 1, 2026...

AI summary NS Power's GRA seeks rate adjustments for 2026-2027 effective January 1, 2026, aligning with the Consensus Agreement. The GRA also requests temporary deferral of depreciation and financing costs if securitization is delayed, using WACC. NS Power clarifies this deferral request is not part of the Settlement or Consensus Agreement.

Delivered by E-mail Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Energy Board 3rd Floor, 1601 Lower Water Street PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood: Re: M12451 – NSPI – 2026-2027 General Rate Applicat...

AI summary The Industrial Group supports NSPI's 2026-2027 GRA seeking 1.8% and 2.4% average rate increases, grounded in a Consensus Agreement. The submission addresses variations to PHP's deferral account and securitization-related timelines, citing prior consultations and a 18-month COSS process. The Consensus Agreement is deemed reasonable and in the public interest.

CONSENSUS AGREEMENT

AI summary This document outlines a consensus agreement in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, involving the Cost of Service Study (COSS) and Above-the-Line (ATL) components. Key details are not provided in the text.

2) 2026-2027 GRA Settlement Process Unlike conventional processes, most of the testing of evidence by customer representatives and their expert consultants was completed before the September 2025 filing of the GRA. Reflecting this timing,...

AI summary The 2026-2027 GRA Settlement Process involved pre-filing evidence testing by customer representatives, leading to a Consensus Agreement. The Industrial Group acknowledged the process's uniqueness, noting missing public responses to information requests but confirming thorough examination of NSPI's GRA proposal. The outcome was a balanced resolution favoring all customer classes and NSPI's reliability.

act of rate changes for the 2026-2027 test period. At the time of negotiations, the 2026 DSM Plan decision was pending, and the AA/BA filing was anticipated, with a material forecasted FAM balance. While the GRA (and media reports) paint t...

AI summary The document discusses rate changes for the 2026-2027 test period, noting that Large and Medium Industrial customers will face significant rate increases once riders are included. NSPI committed to working with affected parties under the Consensus Agreement. Amendments to the DSM Rider and concerns over EfficiencyOne's mid-course adjustments are highlighted.

4) The Board Should Not Modify Individual Components of the Agreement The Consensus Agreement reflects interconnected trade‑offs across rate classes. Adjusting individual elements, particularly without a full evidentiary record of each par...

AI summary The Consensus Agreement's interconnected trade-offs across rate classes should not be modified without a full evidentiary record, as adjusting individual elements risks disrupting the balance. NSPI uses the Equal Life Group (ELG) methodology for depreciation, while the Board's consultant suggested the Average Life Group (ALG) method. Evidence shows both are accepted.

Board has previously found to be prudently incurred by NSPI, but which can no longer be feasibly depreciated under traditional methods considering the Province's legislated decarbonization objectives. Not only have customer representatives...

AI summary Support for NSPI's proposed thermal asset securitization is highlighted, citing benefits like improved credit metrics, lower rates, and alignment with decarbonization goals. S&P and DBRS Morningstar reports, along with the Deputy Minister's letter, affirm securitization's value. The Industrial Group and Province (via Deputy Minister Karen Gatien) endorse the plan despite public concerns from the Premier.

CONCLUSION The Industrial Group respectfully requests that the Board: - 1. Endorse and approve the Consensus Agreement as drafted, recognizing it as a principled and balanced framework reached through substantial negotiation and informed r...

AI summary The Industrial Group requests the NSUARB to approve the Consensus Agreement without modifications, consider full rate impacts on Large Industrial customers, define PHP Deferral Account parameters, declare securitization as public interest, and reject retroactive deferrals. Key considerations include ratepayer impacts, COSS allocations, and regulatory frameworks.

1 2 BEFORE THE NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 3 4 IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380 as amended 5 - and - 6 7 IN THE MATTER OF an Application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for approval of certain revisions to its...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate (SBA) submits closing remarks regarding Nova Scotia Power Incorporated's 2026 General Rate Application. The SBA emphasizes the Settlement Agreement, which resulted from discussions with intervenors and addresses key issues, including the balance between NSPI's cost of capital and the affordability of energy for small businesses.

- 1 signatories to the Settlement Agreement. The SBA engaged the services of Daymark Energy - 2 Advisors and worked with them to ensure that the Settlement Agreement reflected, on balance, the - 3 best outcome for those classes. As the SBA...

AI summary The Settlement Agreement was reached with the involvement of Daymark Energy Advisors to ensure it reflects the best outcome for the classes represented by the SBA. While not perfect, the SBA submits that the agreement is just and in the best interest of the rate classes. The Board has previously considered settlement agreements, emphasizing their role in facilitating good-faith discussions and ensuring public interest.

iod will be subject to a future proceeding and determination by the Board, for which an application will be made in 2026 and in which parties are free to take any position they so choose…" 2 The MEUs agree with NS Power's Panel in acknowle...

AI summary MEUs agree with NS Power's Panel that the Board is not bound by the Consensus Agreement and must ensure just rates. However, MEUs emphasize that the continuation of the Minimum System methodology through 2026/2027 was critical to their agreement. They note that without confirmation of this methodology's future use, they would not have participated in the Consensus Agreement.

6. In fact, this is precisely what Ms. Palmer ultimately recommends in both her evidence and her testimony. 10 & lt;sup>6 Transcript, page 185, line 15 to page 188, line 15. & lt;sup>7 Exhibit N-37, Synapse evidence, page 13, lines 4-11. &...

AI summary The MEUs argue that rejecting the Consensus Agreement would not be just and reasonable, as it already increases rates and faces existing cost pressures from prior Board decisions. They support NS Power's plan to securitize $700 million in the Decarbonization Deferral Account (DDA) to lower customer costs. Ms. Palmer's recommendations align with the Consensus Agreement terms.

- Section 25(1) of the Board Regulatory Rules expressly authorizes the Board to dispose of all or - part of a proceeding by approving a settlement of one or more issues entered into among the parties. - The Settlement Agreement filed in th...

AI summary The document discusses the Board's authority to approve settlement agreements in proceedings, emphasizing that such agreements, when supported by a broad range of stakeholders, are in the public interest and should be given significant weight. This particular settlement relates to the 2026-2027 GRA and has been supported by multiple parties, including the Consumer Advocate and various industry groups.

4.1 Future of Hydro in Nova Scotia The Board Panel's questions during the hearing appropriately highlighted both the magnitude of NS Power's potential hydro decommissioning obligations and the substantial uncertainty surrounding the ultima...

AI summary The Board Panel emphasized uncertainties around NS Power's hydro decommissioning obligations and the lack of a multi-stakeholder framework for decisions. NS Power acknowledges its responsibility to initiate discussions with regulators and stakeholders but notes outcomes are not solely within its control. The Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) will evaluate hydroelectric units based on historical data and constraints to inform future decisions.

5.0 CLOSING The process NS Power undertook to prepare and file this GRA was robust, inclusive, and transparent, resulting in the consensus application put forward for the Board's consideration. In NS Power's view, achieving alignment on th...

AI summary NS Power asserts the GRA process was robust and transparent, leading to a consensus application. The Board has a comprehensive evidentiary record, including consultant analyses and a Settlement Agreement, enabling informed decisions. NS Power acknowledges the Board's efforts during Nova Scotia's energy transition.

Please refer to: David Roberts Email: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Assistant: Alissa Whalen Assistant's email: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) February 6, 2026 VIA EMAIL: crystal.henwood...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate responds to Nova Scotia Power's 2026 General Rate Application (GRA), emphasizing that the GRA is based on a Consensus Agreement aiming to balance fair rates with utility obligations. The Advocate highlights that Cost of Service principles caused uneven rate increases and argues for a methodology review as outlined in the Consensus Agreement.

2 proceedings before the Board, the Public Utilities Act (PUA) stipulates that it is the CA who is to 33 "represent the interests of residential consumers" and, similarly, that it is the SBA who is to 1 Nova Scotia Power Inc., Re, 2005 NSU...

AI summary The Public Utilities Act (PUA) assigns the Consumer Advocate (CA) to represent residential consumers and the Small Business Advocate (SBA) for others, citing past decisions in Nova Scotia Power Inc. cases.

11 NS Power's response: - 12 The GRA process began with the fulsome Cost-of-Service-Study (COSS) process initiated in - 13 December of 2023 and this aspect of the GRA continues today with these submissions. NS Power - 14 also engaged subst...

AI summary NS Power defended its GRA process, emphasizing that it was thorough and involved extensive consultation with customer representatives, leading to significant customer savings. It refuted claims that the process was rushed or led to higher costs, citing a Settlement Agreement and savings of approximately $60 million. The Liberal Caucus criticized the utility's approach to rate applications and highlighted its forecasting capabilities.

1 5.1 Depreciation Methodology 2 3 NS Power wishes only to respond to one item raised by the CA regarding depreciation 4 methodology. The CA submits that NS Power should be directed to undertake a review of 5 depreciation methodology with...

AI summary NS Power argues that existing evidence on depreciation methods (ELG/ALG) is sufficient and further review would be redundant. The IG suggests deferring the decision until more data and the updated Integrated Resource Plan are available. Both parties agree that future reviews (2028/2029) will benefit from 20 years of aged data.

1 6.0 CONCLUSION 2 - 3 NS Power repeats and relies on the evidence presented in this proceeding in support of the relief - 4 sought in the GRA. The evidentiary record reflects extensive analysis, expert input, and detailed - 5 scrutiny of...

AI summary NS Power reiterates its evidence supporting the General Rate Adjustment (GRA), emphasizing extensive analysis and stakeholder collaboration. The proceeding highlights challenges in balancing cost pressures, reliability, affordability, and energy transition goals. NS Power reaffirms its commitment to transparency and ongoing engagement with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) and stakeholders.

1 2 BEFORE THE NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 3 4 5 IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S.1989, c.380 as amended 6 7 - and - 8 9 IN THE MATTER OF an Application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for approval of certain revisions to...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate (SBA) submits reply comments in the Nova Scotia Power Incorporated rate application proceeding, emphasizing the need to balance interests of all ratepayer classes and ensuring that the Board evaluates the application based on its merits rather than the process of reaching the Settlement Agreement.

IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF A GENERAL RATE APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED for approval of certain revisions to its Rates, Charges and Regulations BEFORE: Stephen T. McGrath, K.C., Chair...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. seeks approval for rate revisions under the Public Utilities Act. The proceeding involves multiple intervenors, including consumer advocates, small business representatives, and industry groups, with legal counsel from various organizations. The board members overseeing the case are Stephen T. McGrath, Roland A. Deveau, and Steven M. Murphy.

olving NS Power and customer representatives and it is being filed with the support of those representatives for the outcomes of the GRA". NS Power filed the settlement agreement on November 5, 2025. - [5] NS Power proposes changes to both...

AI summary NS Power filed a settlement agreement with customer representatives to adjust rates, citing complex energy transition challenges including retiring coal plants by 2030 and achieving 80% renewable electricity. The Board conducted a thorough review involving expert consultants, information requests, and public hearings. Customer letters and written submissions were also received.

[38] Previous decisions by the NSUARB set out the principles it applied in its consideration of settlement agreements. Those principles are still relevant and bear repeating. In its decision dated November 5, 2008, about a prior NS Power g...

AI summary The NSUARB outlines its principles for approving settlement agreements in rate proceedings. The Board emphasizes that settlement agreements, when supported by all customer classes and based on thorough evidence, are in the public interest. The Board ensures that only fair and prudently incurred costs are approved, and that customer rates remain just and reasonable.

ty engagement with its present staffing complement, having conducted 65 community meetings recently across the province. The Board finds that adding more staff on these initiatives would be redundant. [98] Secondly, and more importantly, d...

AI summary The Board rejects NS Power's request for additional staffing for customer engagement, citing no formal customer satisfaction surveys on reliability and reliance on performance metrics instead. NS Power also failed to provide cost-benefit analyses for existing digital programs like My Energy Insights.

lti-stakeholder framework for determining whether, when, or how full or partial decommissioning of hydro facilities should occur, nor who would ultimately bear responsibility. NS Power further stated: … NS Power views the present proceedin...

AI summary NS Power proposes a structured approach to address hydro decommissioning, emphasizing stakeholder engagement and regulatory oversight. The Board agrees, directing NS Power to initiate stakeholder discussions, file regular updates, and include decommissioning costs in future rate applications if needed. The process aims to ensure transparency and coordination in addressing hydro asset decommissioning impacts.

3.4.6 Depreciation – Summary [268] For the purposes of the current GRA, the Board finds it appropriate to exclude decommissioning costs for the Wreck Cove, Mersey, and Tusket hydro systems from proposed depreciation rates for the 2026 and...

AI summary The Board excludes decommissioning costs for Wreck Cove, Mersey, and Tusket hydro systems from 2026/2027 depreciation rates but allows partial inclusion for other hydro assets. It mandates NS Power to reconcile salvage costs since 2009 and initiate stakeholder engagement on decommissioning policies. The Board approves most proposed net salvage rates in the settlement agreement.

ithout the support of the Province". Nevertheless, in their closing submissions, all the customer representatives expressed their support for the eventual securitization of the subject thermal assets:

AI summary Customer representatives expressed support for securitization of thermal assets despite initial provincial opposition. Their closing submissions emphasized eventual approval of the securitization process, highlighting alignment with long-term energy strategies.

provided information about the engagement process it followed in developing the cost-of-service proposals it has put forward for approval. NS Power's summary of this process in its application stated: Throughout 2024, technical conferences...

AI summary NS Power detailed its engagement process for developing cost-of-service proposals, including technical conferences, Resolution Sessions mediated by Bruce Outhouse, and extensive data exchanges. 67 models, 152 data requests, and supporting documents were compiled as appendices to the COSS. The process received stakeholder feedback and aimed to streamline discussions under the GRA.

3.8.1 Findings [584] For the purposes of setting rates in this proceeding, the Board accepts the proposed cost-of-service changes and the cost-of-service studies presented in this proceeding, except NS Power is directed to implement a load...

AI summary The Board accepts NS Power's cost-of-service changes but requires adjustments, including a load-carrying capability adjustment. NS Power must address concerns raised by Ms. Palmer and Renewall, particularly regarding distribution cost allocation and OATT tariff issues before transmission tariff responsibility transfers to the Nova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator.

ing the updated COSS would result in lower OATT costs per MW. This is false. As indicated above, the coincidence factors from 'Exhibit 9a Annual' are not relevant to the calculation of the OATT rates. As demonstrated above, the proposed OA...

AI summary NS Power refutes claims that updating the COSS would lower OATT costs, asserting its calculations are accurate and aligned with the 2026-2027 GRA. It clarifies that COS and OATT are distinct constructs, with IESO Nova Scotia set to administer OATT under the More Access to Energy Act . NS Power emphasizes ongoing engagement with REI to address OATT methodology questions.

4.3 Climate Change Adaptation Plan [702] The NSUARB, in its decision in NS Power's last general rate application, directed the utility to develop and file a climate change adaptation plan in consultation with interested parties: [339] The...

AI summary The NSUARB directed NS Power to develop a formal Climate Change Adaptation Plan by 2025, citing the need for consultative processes to ensure prudence in storm restoration costs and enhance capital planning. NS Power's current measures are deemed insufficiently formalized, with references to Hydro-Québec and guidance from Electricity Canada and the Electric Power Research Institute. Costs of plan development will be deferred for recovery through future rate applications.

4.3.1 Findings [707] The fact that NS Power compiles and analyzes climate data and uses this information in its asset management systems is positive. However, NS Power's Climate Change Adaptation Plan is more of a process than a plan per s...

AI summary The NSUARB acknowledges NS Power's climate data efforts but criticizes its Climate Change Adaptation Plan as insufficient, lacking transparency and stakeholder engagement. The Board directs NS Power to revise the plan by October 1, 2026, to better address climate impacts, adaptation measures, and challenges. The current plan fails to meet objectives related to storm cost recovery and capital planning.

- To provide a reconciliation showing the annual collection of interim and final net salvage in rates from 2009 onwards in its next depreciation study. This information is to be presented for actual interim salvage costs that have been inc...

AI summary NS Power must reconcile annual salvage collections, consult on hydro plant decommissioning, update depreciation studies with ALG/ELG methodology comparisons, and address Mr. Madsen's asset service life recommendations. Directives include analyzing depreciation expense, retirement patterns, and Nova Scotia-specific factors affecting asset retirement rates.

1.0 GENERAL DESCRIPTION This document describes the plan for administering Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NS Power) Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FAM), which was approved by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (as of April 1, 2025 referred to...

AI summary This document outlines the administration plan for Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FAM), approved by the Nova Scotia Energy Board. The FAM allows for the recovery of fuel and purchased power costs, with the Base Cost of Fuel being reset periodically through General Rate Applications or Board orders. Stakeholders can challenge the methodology and forecasts used in the FAM, and the Board will conduct audits of NS Power's FAM accounts.

6.0 STAKEHOLDER REVIEW AND DISCOVERY Monthly, quarterly and annual non-confidential and confidential reporting will be available for access and viewing. NS Power confidential reporting will be available electronically or in a confidential...

AI summary This section outlines the procedures for stakeholder review and discovery during the Base Cost of Fuel adjustment process. It details the availability of non-confidential and confidential reports, access to NS Power's electronic data cart, and the opportunity for stakeholders to challenge fuel costs and forecasts during hearings.

NSP COST OF SERVICE PANEL 99 Cr-ex, (Mahody) 1 based on cost causation? 14 the changing system, the Path to 2030. What is changing 15 on the system as we phase out coal over time, add more 16 renewables to the system, and how has that impa...

AI summary The document discusses Nova Scotia Power's cost-of-service analysis, including data requests, modelling exercises, stakeholder engagement, and a Settlement Agreement. The process involved reviewing historic 2023 data and addressing concerns about future revenue requirements.

BY MR. MAHODY: Q. Just first off, can I ask the panel, the Consensus Agreement was filed in this matter as a result of an IR that was asked by the Board. Did the company have a reason for not filing the Consensus Agreement with its Applica...

AI summary Mr. Mahody questions whether the company had a reason for not filing the Consensus Agreement with its Application, noting that the Consensus Agreement was filed as a result of an IR requested by the Board. The company's representative explains that the decision was made not to file it with the Application, as the Application stood on its own, different from past settlement agreements.

NSP COST OF SERVICE PANEL 125 Cr-ex, (Mahody) detail on to assist in determining whether or not the Minimum System classification is the appropriate system classification going forward? A. (Willett) I think it would be seeking stakeholder...

AI summary The discussion centers on determining the appropriate system classification for the Minimum System Study, emphasizing the need for stakeholder feedback and ongoing collaboration with customer representatives. It also touches on the differences between this process and piloting time-infused rates.

NSP DEPRECIATION PANEL 309 Questions, (Murphy) 1 Depreciation Study: 2 3 4 5 6 7 [Nova Scotia] Power has initiated the broader discussions that is necessary to arrive at a future approach for these assets that considers and takes into acco...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power is initiating broader discussions on depreciation for assets, emphasizing the need for stakeholder input from various groups including government, environmental, and community perspectives. The process is expected to take time and may not be complete before the next GRA.

1 A. (Williams) So I think I think 2 we knew of the potential for that, Mr. Mahody. I think, 3 as we've discussed, there's been many different avenues 4 that we have pursued to try to reduce costs and the 5 potential for a rate increase as...

AI summary The discussion centers on the company's awareness of potential rate increases and the steps taken to address them, including cost-reduction efforts and customer consultations. The company was preparing a Depreciation Study as per the Board's directive but delayed filing a rate case until further discussions with customers were completed.

don't have a set or an expected outcome, necessarily. It's about, again, similar to the rate application discussions, about having the discussion, understanding perspectives, understanding how a mechanism such as this may be applicable in...

AI summary The discussion revolves around exploring mechanisms used in other jurisdictions and determining their potential applicability in Nova Scotia. The conversation suggests that such mechanisms may be considered in a future GRA (General Rate Application) process, pending the outcome of discussions with customer stakeholders.

NSP GENERAL/REGULATORY PANEL 717 Cr-ex, (Mahody) 1 but certainly could be something that was brought forward 5 6 7 8 9 10 [Nova Scotia] Power and the MEUs will work collaboratively [on a] good faith [basis] to determine and attempt to agre...

AI summary The document discusses ongoing discussions between Nova Scotia Power and MEUs regarding timelines and collaboration, with no specific modified deadlines identified. The conversation is part of a regulatory proceeding, and the parties have not yet reached a conclusion.

1 there's some valuable aspects of it, and they talk about 11 lead to higher costs for customers over the long term. 12 (SHORT PAUSE) 13 [11:30:00] MR. MAHODY: So, Mr. Chair, I think 14 that leaves this side of the room as no longer requir...

AI summary The text discusses a proceeding where Nova Scotia Power's reliability plan and customer satisfaction measures are being reviewed. It mentions that Nova Scotia Power has held over 65 community meetings and does not plan to use CSAT as a measure of the effectiveness of its Five-Year Reliability Plan.

NSP GENERAL/REGULATORY PANEL 869 Questions, (Deveau) 1 expense. 1 of engagement and communities, this would be a separate 2 group than the one you talked about for the 65 community 3 planning meetings? 4 (Williams) Not necessarily A. 5 sep...

AI summary The text discusses engagement with communities through meetings led by the Reliability Team, supported by the Communications Team, and references a financial increase related to grid modernization and customer integration in a Grant Thornton document.

1 other departments. These other departments, their focus 2 isn't necessarily community engagement, but certainly, 3 because of the nature of their responsibilities, there is 4 a public engagement component to that. 5 So just as there is w...

AI summary The discussion highlights the importance of public engagement within Nova Scotia Power, emphasizing the role of the comms and public affairs group in managing these efforts. It also touches on the significance of performance metrics and customer satisfaction in evaluating service delivery.

1 meetings or sessions in specific communities. 2 So certainly there's a benefit to kind 3 of, I'll call it more generic communication, whether it be 4 social media or posting on websites, that type of thing, 5 but I don't think –– certain...

AI summary The discussion highlights the importance of face-to-face communication in community engagement, particularly in addressing reliability issues and community-specific concerns related to hydro facilities.

possible. So bringing people directly to the community and holding community meetings, as opposed to, you know, somebody like going door to door, something like that. It's trying to create economies of scale and provide that information as...

AI summary The text discusses the challenges of effective community consultation and the need to balance reliability with affordability in the context of a Five-Year Reliability Plan. The speaker acknowledges that there is no perfect approach to consultation and that adjustments may be needed in the future.

1 for affordability with increasing costs in these areas of 2 consultation that we're talking about? What's the 3 calculus there? 4 A. (Williams) So, sir, I think the 5 balance is much of what we've talked about already where 6 we do see g...

AI summary The discussion focuses on balancing affordability with increasing costs and the importance of customer engagement and trust for reliability initiatives. The speaker acknowledges efforts to reduce costs and achieve a reasonable revenue requirement but notes the absence of a formal, costed-out plan for consultation and engagement similar to the reliability plan.

Questions, (Chair) 1 Q. So in this part of your report, 2 you're –– as I understand it, you recognize that the 3 parties have reached a Settlement Agreement and so you 4 recommend that the Basic Customer Service Method versus 5 Minimum Sys...

AI summary The Chair raises concerns about whether the Settlement Agreement should be revisited in conjunction with other cost-of-service methods, not just the Basic Customer Service Method versus Minimum System Method. Palmer responds that there was significant disagreement among stakeholders on the methodologies used by Nova Scotia Power and questions the rationale for these changes.

INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS proposed during the Cost-of-Service Study process in 2024. I can I would like to quote from my own evidence. I don't know if we need to call it up, but I say that the company has not e...

AI summary The discussion centers on the Cost-of-Service Study process in 2024, with the witness stating that the report by Nova Scotia Power Inc. and Elenchus provides rationale for changes to the study, but questions remain about how stakeholder concerns were addressed.

SWEB Development Mr. Mason Baker, P.Eng. BOARD COUNSEL: Mr. William L. Mahody, K.C. BOARD STAFF: Mr. Steve Pronko, Director, Electrical Advisory Services Ms. Libby McNamara, Director, Risk and Financial Advisory Services Ms. Holly Chisholm...

AI summary The SWEB Development section lists the individuals involved in the proceeding, including board counsel, board staff, and public proceeding assistants, indicating the participants in the regulatory process.

LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. NO. PAGE NO. January 13, 2026 U-26 Re U-6: To provide revised versions of Table 1 and 2 from Ms. Palmer's evidence that would show the RC ratio and class revenue increases using the 1.5 kil...

AI summary The document outlines a proceeding where Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSP) provides dates for undertaking responses and closing submissions. NSP proposes submitting undertaking responses by January 20th and closing submissions by January 30th, with reply submissions due by February 6th. The Chair confirms the proposed dates.