Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Stakeholder Engagement" in M12696

Matter: NSP Maritime Link Inc. (NSPML) - Application to Review the Holdback Mechanism
6 passages 5 documents

Stakeholder Engagement across all matters →

N-2NSPML (BW) RIRs 1-22 - Redacted 1 passage
3.2.3 Global Comparison of Hydropower Permitting Process p. pp. 158-160
government: national, regional, and/or local. The need for coordination, along with extensive study requirements and stakeholder consultations, result in multiyear hydropower authorization processes. Figure 21 summarizes information about...

AI summary The global hydropower permitting process varies significantly by region and project size, with larger projects requiring multiyear authorization due to complex studies and stakeholder consultations. Examples include Canada (3.3–5–6 years), Norway (1–2 vs. 4+ years), and the U.S. (median 3.34 years). Uncertainty and cost are higher in countries like Portugal and Spain, while small projects dominate in the UK and Germany.

N-4NSPML (IG) RIRs 1-26 - Redacted 2 passages
Preface p. p. 183
s development, more submarine power cable projects are economically viable, or even possible. New applications for submarine power cables appear while known applications are pursued on a larger scale. Submarine power cables draw the attent...

AI summary The text highlights growing interest in submarine power cables driven by offshore wind projects, new applications, and involvement from diverse stakeholders including engineers, investors, regulators, and environmental groups. Cable costs and installation challenges are critical factors, with regulators and authorities increasingly engaged due to rising permit applications.

7.1.8 Organisation p. p. 183
7.1.8 Organisation In 1964, a report on a submarine cable laying operation declared: "Captain and crew of the boats shall be cooperative with the cable laying work and, if possible, having experience in cable handling" [11]. The insight be...

AI summary The text outlines the organizational structure and coordination required for submarine cable installation projects, emphasizing the roles of various stakeholders, the importance of clear responsibilities, and the benefits of coordination meetings to ensure project success.

N-6NSPML (SBA) RIRs 1-6 - Redacted 1 passage
NSPML Responses to Small Business Advocate Information Requests
NSPML Responses to Small Business Advocate Information Requests

AI summary NSPML provided responses to information requests from the Small Business Advocate, addressing regulatory compliance, cost structures, and program impacts. Key themes include affordability, cost recovery, and stakeholder engagement in regulatory proceedings.

N-7Evidence - BW 1 passage
Section 246 p. p. 18
- NS Block, measured in MWh (excluding Make-up Energy), is received during each of 12 - consecutive months."[41](#page-18-1) In introducing this requirement, the Board also stated: - NSPML/NS Power may apply to the Board for relief if it c...

AI summary The requirement mandates NSPML to receive twelve consecutive months of NS Block volumes (excluding Make-up Energy) at least 90% of the total monthly volumes called for under the Energy and Capacity Agreement. This prevents over-reliance on Make-up volumes and ensures consistency and predictability in volume delivery.

N-8Evidence - CA 1 passage
EXPERT TESTIMONY p. p. 10
hern Alliance for Clean Energy. Adequacy of consideration of energy efficiency in Georgia Power's 2010 integrated resource plan, including cost effectiveness, rate and bill impacts, and lost revenues. Georgia PSC Docket No. 31082, direct t...

AI summary Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (SACE) provided testimony in multiple regulatory proceedings from 2010–2013, challenging the adequacy of energy efficiency considerations in Georgia Power and South Carolina Electric & Gas's integrated resource plans (IRPs) and demand-side management (DSM) plans. Focus areas included cost-effectiveness, stakeholder engagement, resource mix analysis, and program revisions.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →