Topic:"Stakeholder Engagement" in M13007

2. INTRODUCTION 2 IESO Nova Scotia is the recently established independent system operator for Nova Scotia, taking 3 over the system planning, energy resource procurement, and interconnection functions of NSPI. 4 Currently, IESO Nova Scoti...

AI summary IESO Nova Scotia, the independent system operator for Nova Scotia, is seeking temporary financial relief while developing a permanent fee and cost recovery mechanism. It plans to submit this mechanism for NSEB approval by Q2 2026 and recover its remaining revenue requirement from March 2027, the end of its 2026/2027 fiscal year.

1 IESO Nova Scotia has conducted a thorough regulatory stakeholder engagement process during 2 the various stages of the fee recovery mechanism's development, as outlined in IESO Nova 3 Scotia's progress update letter to the NSEB on July 6...

AI summary IESO Nova Scotia has conducted stakeholder engagement during the development of a fee recovery mechanism and seeks Board approval to replace the temporary fee mechanism. The mechanism involves calculating fees based on a methodology and seeking annual approval for future fees and adjustments. The Maritime Electric Act (MAEA) does not specify how fees should be calculated or charged.

4.1.1. A Note on Option 2b - While Option 2b Consolidated charge to NSPI, based on the E1 DSM model and NSPI's DSM - Rider, is ranked nearly on par with the proposed Option 2a (as noted in Figure 9 and FTI's report), - the E1 model of a co...

AI summary Option 2b, which involves a consolidated DSM charge to NSPI under the Public Utilities Act, is nearly as favorable as Option 2a but lacks ISO jurisdictional support and faced opposition from stakeholders, including NSPI, during stakeholder engagement.

NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD NOTICE OF PAPER HEARING The Independent Energy System Operator of Nova Scotia (IESO Nova Scotia) applied to the Nova Scotia Energy Board on July 31, 2026, for approval of a fee recovery mechanism and corresponding...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board is considering a fee recovery mechanism proposed by IESO Nova Scotia to recover its revenue requirement from market participants. The current interim fees, approved under Interim Order M12663, will be replaced. The Board invites public comments and requests for intervenor status.

Mark 1. In the jurisdictional scan, did FTI Consulting note what occurred in the event that an IESO incurred costs that were later deemed imprudent or where an overspend occurred that was not subsequently approved by the Board? FTI has not...

AI summary The text discusses questions raised during a regulatory proceeding regarding the IESO's cost recovery mechanisms, rate design, and stakeholder engagement. FTI Consulting's responses indicate that certain aspects, such as the impact of overspending and rate design considerations, will be addressed in their fee recovery mechanism recommendation.

WHEREAS - A. The Nova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator (IESO NS), along with [PARTIES TO SETTLEMENT], (collectively the "Stakeholders", who along with IESO NS are referred to herein as the "Parties") have engaged in a collaborativ...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator (IESO NS) and stakeholders have reached a consensus on a cost recovery mechanism through collaborative meetings and the submission of a Draft Fee Recovery Application, which includes a report and fee calculation model from FTI Consulting.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL Application, "once the LRS is confirmed operational and providing electricity to its customers, IESO Nova Scotia will apply for corresponding adjustments to fees at the next appropriate opportunity to do so."[1](#page-9-0)...

AI summary The document discusses IESO Nova Scotia's plan to adjust fees once the LRS becomes operational, ensuring the LRS pays its proportionate share through future revenue requirements or compliance filings. The LRS was invited to participate in stakeholder sessions but did not respond.

Response IR – 19 a) Each LSE has its own cost of service allocation methodology that generally assigns different proportions of costs to different customer classes. For example, an LSE might be charged an additional 5 cents in ISO charges...

AI summary The response discusses how Load Serving Entities (LSEs) allocate costs differently across customer classes, using an example of a 5 cents per MWh charge. It mentions IESO Nova Scotia's role in assisting stakeholders through engagement sessions and the development of an illustrative model to demonstrate potential cost allocations.

Nova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator (IESO Nova Scotia) Responses to Small Business Advocate (SBA) Information Requests

AI summary The document outlines IESO Nova Scotia's responses to information requests made by the Small Business Advocate (SBA). It reflects the regulatory process and stakeholder engagement in addressing concerns raised by the SBA regarding energy system operations.

The application is supported by three expert submissions: Appendix 1, a jurisdictional scan by FTI Consulting LLP ("FTI") of ISO fee recovery mechanisms in other North American jurisdictions; Appendix 2, FTI's recommendation report, which...

AI summary The application for a fee recovery mechanism is supported by expert submissions from FTI Consulting LLP and Power Advisory LLC. IESO Nova Scotia engaged stakeholders during the proposal development. LEI has reviewed the application and will assess its key elements in Section 5.

ent proving that the rate design is fair. Transparent rate methodologies facilitate stakeholder engagement and regulatory oversight, also ensuring that the basis for rates is clear and evidence based. Stability in rates benefits both IESO...

AI summary The text outlines underlying principles for cost allocation and rate design, emphasizing fairness, transparency, stability, cost causation, compatibility with incentives, nondiscrimination, and simplicity. These principles aim to ensure equitable treatment of customers and support regulatory oversight and stakeholder engagement.

e passed through to the LSEs and their ratepayers. As the OATT already exists, the resulting charges would sit alongside the other transmission-related charges that transmission customers already pay. LEI has also considered the consolidat...

AI summary The document evaluates the appropriateness of the proposed direct invoicing mechanism for recovering transmission costs. It considers alternatives, such as the consolidated direct charge option, but finds that the proposed mechanism is reasonable and administratively simple, despite some stakeholder opposition.

Q: Have you testified previously in utility proceedings? - A: Yes. I have testified more than eighty times before utility regulators in twelve U.S. states and Nova Scotia, and appeared numerous additional times before various regulatory an...

AI summary The witness has extensive experience testifying in utility proceedings across multiple jurisdictions and has previously provided evidence in numerous matters before the Board on behalf of the Consumer Advocate and the Minister of Energy.

Alliance for Clean Energy, and Southern Environmental Law Center. Adequacy of consideration of energy efficiency in Duke Energy Carolinas and Progress Energy Carolinas' 2009 integrated resource plans. Georgia PSC Docket No. 31081, direct t...

AI summary The text outlines expert testimony and regulatory proceedings related to the adequacy of energy efficiency considerations in integrated resource plans and demand-side management plans by utility companies in Georgia and South Carolina. It discusses topics such as cost effectiveness, rate impacts, stakeholder engagement, and alternative resource options.

NOTICE OF PAPER HEARING _____________________________________________________________________________ The Independent Energy System Operator of Nova Scotia (IESO Nova Scotia) applied to the Nova Scotia Energy Board on July 31, 2026, for ap...

AI summary The Independent Energy System Operator of Nova Scotia (IESO Nova Scotia) has applied for approval of a new fee recovery mechanism to recover its revenue requirement from market participants. The current temporary financial relief, approved under Interim Order M12663, will be replaced by this proposed mechanism. The Nova Scotia Energy Board will conduct a paper hearing and is inviting public participation and evidence submissions.

NOTICE OF PAPER HEARING _____________________________________________________________________________ The Independent Energy System Operator of Nova Scotia (IESO Nova Scotia) applied to the Nova Scotia Energy Board on July 31, 2026, for ap...

AI summary The Independent Energy System Operator of Nova Scotia (IESO Nova Scotia) has applied for approval of a new fee recovery mechanism to recover its revenue requirement from market participants, replacing the current temporary financial relief. The Nova Scotia Energy Board will hold a paper hearing to consider this matter, with opportunities for public comment and intervenor participation.

SMALL BUSINESS ADVOCATE TAKE NOTICE that the Small Business Advocate hereby Intervenes in this proceeding in accordance with the regulations. The Small Business Advocate represents 3 classes of small business (namely 10, 11, and 21 small b...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate intervenes in the proceeding, representing three classes of small businesses. Communication should be directed to the Small Business Advocate and their legal team. The notice is dated August 2026 and addressed to the Clerk of the Nova Scotia Energy Board.

NOTICE OF INTERVENTION OF: K + S Windsor Salt Ltd. CKF Inc. Crown Fibre Tube Inc. Irving Shipbuilding Inc. Maritime Paper Products Ltd. Michelin North America (Canada) Inc. Compass Minerals Canada Corp. Farnell Packaging Ltd. P & H Milling...

AI summary The Industrial Group, consisting of several large and medium industrial customers of NSPI, is intervening in the proceeding as their costs are directly affected by the Application. They are addressing issues established by the Energy Board.

1 2026 M13007 2 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 3 IN THE MATTER OF: The More Access to Energy Act (the "MAEA") 4 IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by the Independent Energy System Operator of 5 Nova Scotia ("IESO Nova Scotia") made pursuant to Sec...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board has issued an information request to the Independent Energy System Operator of Nova Scotia (IESO-NS) asking for all hypothetical cost recovery scenarios and related analyses used during the stakeholder engagement process for its Fee Recovery Mechanism application under the More Access to Energy Act.

Request IR-2: - Reference: IESO Nova Scotia Fee Recovery Mechanism Progress Update (letter dated July 6, - 2026) - IESO Nova Scotia states the following: - "…Progress to date includes the following: - On May 5, 2026, FTI's report on its ju...

AI summary The document outlines progress in the IESO Nova Scotia Fee Recovery Mechanism proceeding, including stakeholder engagement sessions, feedback collection, and the distribution of a draft settlement agreement. It requests copies of various documents related to stakeholder feedback and communications.

INFORMATION REQUESTS To: The Independent Energy System Operator ("IESO") Mark Peachey Director, Regulatory Affairs From: The Berwick Electric Commission, the Riverport Electric Light Commission, and the Towns of Mahone Bay and Antigonish (...

AI summary The Berwick Electric Commission, Riverport Electric Light Commission, and the Towns of Mahone Bay and Antigonish have submitted an information request to the Independent Energy System Operator, seeking responses by September 22, 2026, regarding regulatory matters.

October 13, 2026 VIA EMAIL Ms. Crystal Henwood Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Energy Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood: Re: M13007 - Independent Energy System Operator of Nova Scotia Application f...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate (SBA) has reviewed materials related to the Independent Energy System Operator of Nova Scotia's application for the review of its Fee Recovery Mechanism and intends to participate in the remaining aspects of the hearing schedule without filing evidence.