Topic:"Standardized Filing" in M08604

in the Confidential Information in one legal file copy that may be 28 retained solely for the determination of its legal obligations under this Agreement. 29 Residual Information 30 11. The Recipient or its designate or any other person ha...

AI summary The text outlines confidentiality and limited rights provisions in a supply agreement, including restrictions on the use of residual information and the non-granting of intellectual property rights beyond limited usage terms.

a one-year 23 continuation plan, similar in concept to the approved DSM Plan for the 2015 transition year. 24 This is an exception to the typical three-year plan required under the Public Utilities Act. 25 To align with the continuation ye...

AI summary The document discusses a one-year continuation plan for the DSM Plan, an exception to the usual three-year requirement under the Public Utilities Act. It also references the franchise extension to 2025, which will require subsequent DSM Resource Plans to follow the three-year framework and use the Standardized Filing Framework.

urce Plans will be 4 three-year agreements, in compliance with the Public Utilities Act. EfficiencyOne will 5 utilize the Standardized Filing Framework for these agreements. 12 In accordance with the Consensus Agreement to the 2016-2018 DS...

AI summary The document discusses the establishment of a Standardized Filing Framework for future applications to approve a DSM Supply Agreement, in compliance with the Public Utilities Act and the Consensus Agreement to the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. The framework was filed with the UARB as part of a Settlement Agreement in 2016.

Expected Evaluation/ Year Recommendation Text Source Status Comments Period of Verification Completion 2013 Evaluation Continue to work on including as much information as possible in OV-R6 In Progress ENS agrees with this recommendation a...

AI summary In 2013, a recommendation was made to improve the inclusion of information in the DSMDS through standardized entries. ENS agreed and implemented a Dynamic DSM data tracking system in 2017, which improved customer experience and program delivery efficiency.

outside the organization where applicable. Attachment 1, Table 2, 2013-2015 Verification Recommendations Efficiency Nova Scotia - 2017 DSM Annual Progress Report Date Filed: March 29, 2018 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-17 Attachment 1, P...

AI summary The document includes a 2017 DSM Annual Progress Report from Efficiency Nova Scotia, filed on May 30, 2018, and references an attachment from the Standardized Filing (SBA) process. It appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding involving demand-side management programs.

zations at ENS's next in-house group seminar. Attachment 1, Table 2, 2013-2015 Verification Recommendations Efficiency Nova Scotia - 2017 DSM Annual Progress Report Date Filed: March 29, 2018 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-17 Attachment 1...

AI summary The document references Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Annual Progress Report and includes an attachment table with verification recommendations from 2013-2015. It also mentions the Standardized Filing (SBA) and the date of filing as May 30, 2018.

18 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-17 Attachment 1, Page 80 of 92

AI summary The document is a filing from May 30, 2018, related to the Standardized Filing (SBA) and includes an attachment page reference.

EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-01: 2 3 Page 5 row 25 and page 6 row 1 of the Evidence states, “To align with the co...

AI summary EfficiencyOne explains that the 2019 DSM Resource Plan was developed using a continuation approach under the 2015 Electricity Plan Implementation Act, not the Standardized Filing Framework. This approach aligns with the Public Utilities Act's exception for continuation plans, relying on consistency with the 2016-2018 DSM Plan's cost-effectiveness data from Navigant’s ELRAM model.

the first-year unit costs within the approved 2016-2018 DSM Plan to those 26 within the 2019 DSM Plan. 27 28 Similarly, the Standardized Framework requires EfficiencyOne to propose one or more alternate 29 scenarios of DSM budgets, and for...

AI summary The text discusses the comparison of first-year unit costs between the 2016-2018 DSM Plan and the 2019 DSM Plan, referencing the Standardized Framework's requirement for EfficiencyOne to propose alternate DSM budget scenarios and NS Power to conduct rate impact analyses. It notes that the 2020-2022 DSM Plan will follow the Standardized Filing Framework with full modelling.

share of savings from lighting measures. To minimize cost of the DSM 7 Plan proceeding, E1 used the modeling for the previously approved three-year 8 plan for 2016-2018. 3 9 Q. Did E1 use the Standardized Filing Framework for this DSM Plan...

AI summary E1 did not use the Standardized Filing Framework for the 2019 DSM Plan, citing consistency with the 2015 Electricity Plan Implementation Act's continuation year approach. This led to insufficient data and stakeholder review challenges. Recommendations include adopting the Standard Filing Framework and providing detailed metrics for future plans.

RBIA) by September 30, 2018. 7. E1 is directed to initiate a new DSM Potential Study for completion no later than July 31,2019, to assess the availability of cost-effective DSM measures. 8. E1 is directed to keep the Board apprised of the...

AI summary The Board directs E1 to complete a DSM Potential Study, improve GHG and CO2e emission accounting in DSM planning, enhance RBIA, address eTRM transparency, and adhere to standardized filing frameworks. It also mandates alternate DSM budget scenarios and rate impact analysis by NSPI, referencing Matter M06733 and the 2016 Standardized Filing Framework.

1 Request IR-1: - 2 Page 5 row 25 and page 6 row 1 of the Evidence states, "To align with the continuation year - 3 approach, this DSM Resource Plan was not developed based on the Standardized Filing - 4 Framework." Please explain the rati...

AI summary Request IR-1 asks for an explanation of why the DSM Resource Plan was not developed using the Standardized Filing Framework, citing alignment with the continuation year approach as the rationale.

RBIA) by September 30, 2018. 7. E1 is directed to initiate a new DSM Potential Study for completion no later than July 31,2019, to assess the availability of cost-effective DSM measures. 8. E1 is directed to keep the Board apprised of the...

AI summary The Board directs E1 to complete a DSM Potential Study by 2019, improve GHG estimation accuracy, incorporate CO2e emissions into cost-effectiveness analysis, and enhance RBIA and eTRM transparency. E1 must also provide alternate DSM budget scenarios and adhere to standardized filing frameworks, with NSPI conducting rate impact analyses.

Business Day is 2 specified, (ii) weeks and months shall refer to calendar weeks and months, 3 respectively, and (iii) years shall refer to calendar years; 4 (j) in computing any period of time prescribed or allowed under this Agreement, t...

AI summary The text defines key terms in a legal agreement, including time period calculations, document hierarchy, and mutual drafting involvement. It establishes that Business Days, calendar periods, and document precedence rules govern the agreement, with no presumption of one party's dominance in preparation.