Home›System Reliability›M04265›Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"System Reliability" in M04265

Matter: P-871 - Nova Scotia Power Inc. - Application for a Load Retention Rate (2000)
5 passages 2 documents

System Reliability across all matters →

P-2NSPI (UARB) IR-1 to IR-33; NSPI (Irving Oil) IR-1 to IR-7; NSPI (CBRM) IR-1 to IR-17 - Responses 2 passages
Full Range of Evaluation Criteria
Full Range of Evaluation Criteria PROSCREEN II provides a full range of evaluation criteria so that every aspect of a plan can be assessed: RATES Average Cass Prices - Base and Fuel Class Rate Increases - Base and Fuel ECONOMICS Present Wo...

AI summary PROSCREEN II offers a comprehensive set of evaluation criteria for assessing energy plans, covering rates, economics, reliability, financial integrity, customer impact, and societal and shareholder considerations. Key aspects include revenue requirements, cost assessments, reliability metrics, financial ratios, and stakeholder impacts.

Introduction
Introduction The PROVIEW (PRY) Module is a resource planning model which determines the least-cost balanced demand and supply plan for a utility system under prescribed sets of constraints and assumptions. PROVIEW incorporates a wide varie...

AI summary The PROVIEW module is a resource planning tool used to develop least-cost balanced demand and supply plans for utility systems. It works with other modules like GAF and LFA to evaluate DSM programs through screening, optimization, and detailed analysis, incorporating factors such as emissions, cost effectiveness, and reliability.

P-3NSPI (Sempra) IR-1 to IR-14 3 passages
Preamble
en a utility's actual reserve margin equals 14 its target. To compensate for this flaw, some jurisdictions allow utilities to adjust the 15 results downward whenever a utility has excess capacity. 16 17 The value-of-service (VOS) method ca...

AI summary The document discusses the value-of-service (VOS) method for calculating marginal generation capacity costs by measuring the cost of outages or the amount consumers would pay to avoid power loss. It highlights that the VOS method assumes a utility cannot add generating units to meet load increases and that outage costs are influenced by reliability levels and customer expectations.

DR. CHAMBERLIN, CROSS-EXAM. BY MR. KEHOE
DR. CHAMBERLIN, CROSS-EXAM. BY MR. KEHOE 2756 doesn't particularly affect us. If people are at home and an air conditioner goes out on a hot summer day, those customers would probably have paid more than I would have to avoid that summer o...

AI summary Dr. Chamberlin discusses variations in outage costs among different customer classes, noting that industrial customers like petrochemical firms and semiconductor manufacturers have high reliability value and are willing to pay more for power quality. In contrast, domestic customers, located on the lower end of the distribution system, face inherently lower reliability.

DR. CHAMBERLIN, CROSS-EXAM. BY MR. KEHOE 2758
DR. CHAMBERLIN, CROSS-EXAM. BY MR. KEHOE 2758 - that where you're coming from? - 2 A. I'm not sure that I'm saying I don't think I'm 3 saying that you have to agree with the reliability 4 standard. What I'm saying is that the price should...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the reliability standard and how the price should reflect the system's cost to maintain it. The witness is questioned about the historical revenue-to-cost ratio for domestic customers and whether outage costs influence this ratio across jurisdictions.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →