HomeSystem ReliabilityM12742Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"System Reliability" in M12742

Matter: Nova Scotia Power Inc. - 2025 Annual FAM Report  (Fuel Adjustment Mechanism)
4 passages 2 documents

System Reliability across all matters →

N-1Annual FAM Report 2025 - Redacted 2 passages
Plant Performance p. p. 2
Plant Performance DAFOR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Annual Actual Annual Budget Prior Year Plant Lingan Unit 1 0.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.3% 5.8% 5.7% 5.2% Lingan Unit 2 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% 6.8% 2.6% Lingan Unit 3 6.2% 0.0% 0.2% 4.4% 3.2% 4.5% 0.1% Lingan Unit...

AI summary The table presents DAFOR (Demand Availability Factor) performance metrics for various power plants across quarters and annually, comparing actual performance to budgeted targets and prior-year data. Key plants include Lingan, Tufts Cv, Pt Tupper, and Trenton units, with significant variations in performance, such as Tufts Cv Unit 5 exceeding its budget by 150%.

System Losses p. p. 2
System Losses GWh Actual Actual Budget Budget 2025 2024 2025 2026 Total System Requirements 11,473.6 11,326.3 11,541.2 11,392.0 Domestic Electric Sales 10,705.1 10,580.6 10,764.8 10,621.8 Export Sales 4.5 0.0 2.5 13.5 Net System Losses 764...

AI summary The table provides a comparison of actual and budgeted system losses for 2024 and 2025, showing a slight increase in losses from 6.6% to 6.7% between 2024 and 2025. The budget figures are based on the 2024 Q3 NSPI Internal Forecast.

N-2NSPI (NESB) RIR 1 to 17 - Redacted 2 passages
Plant Performance p. p. 3
Plant Performance Availability Factor Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Annual Actual Annual Budget Prior Year Plant Lingan Unit 1 100% 95% 55% 41% 73% 92% 73% Lingan Unit 2 98% 100% 100% 77% 94% 88% 88% Lingan Unit 3 87% 45% 100% 94% 82% 92% 87% Lingan Unit 4...

AI summary The document presents a table detailing plant availability factors for multiple units across quarters and annually, comparing actual performance to budgeted targets. Availability is calculated using operating hours and ABNO outages, with notable discrepancies between actual and budgeted figures for several units, such as Lingan Unit 1 (73% actual vs. 92% budget).

REDACTED p. p. 3
REDACTED 1 Request IR-6: 2 3 Reference: Tab A6NC 4 5 (a) Please explain why, as a solid fuel generator, Point Aconi's capacity factor was lower 6 than budgeted, when solid fuel production overall was much higher than budgeted 7 across the...

AI summary The document discusses Point Aconi's lower-than-budgeted capacity factor despite higher overall solid fuel production, attributing it to changes in SO₂ certificate of variance and dispatch decisions influenced by system economics. It also addresses lower-than-budgeted availability factors for multiple generating units, with NSPI citing planned outages as the basis for budgeted figures.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →