Home›Tariff Design›M12780›Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Tariff Design" in M12780

Matter: EfficiencyOne - 2027-2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan Application
7 passages 6 documents

Tariff Design across all matters →

E-12E1 (NSEB) RIRs 1-66 - Redacted 2 passages
p. p. 133
Ca teg Su bs ati nd da tio mm ary o erv on s a re co mm en ns 1. Mi nim al Re vie of Re ba te Le l in Te lat Ad jus ted ba te lev el fie ld wit hin th e D ist rib uto r T lat e i ot iew ed rt o f th e P w ve mp e: re em p s n rev as pa rog...

AI summary The text discusses a minimal review of rebate levels in the Distributor Tariff, focusing on the need for proper procedures and ensuring that the distributor's submitted tariff includes the correct fields to be checked during the review process.

p. pp. 138-139
Th is ini l d tat ion to ide e t he W ith t d ion of th iew W ith in the M T ke tat ter t ere m ma oc um en ev nc ou oc um en e r ev er as rac r, m an ag em en lcu lat ion vie of the M Tr ke let ed d r iew da th iew sh ld ide dd ing tab fo...

AI summary The document discusses the submission of a matter for consideration, emphasizing the need for timely inclusion of information and the importance of accurate data representation. It references a master tariff and the submission of information for review.

E-38Synapse (IG) RIR 1 to 10 1 passage
Section 19 p. p. 13
1 2 E1 provided the modified-PAC for SE in response to Synapse IR-02 as Attachment 3 2, Appendix A, Round 2 Modelling Assumptions and Attachment 2, Appendix G, 4 Round 2 Measure Level Technical Tables 1SE-Base3. (b) These files do not indi...

AI summary E1 submitted modified-PAC files for SE in response to Synapse IR-02, but the files lack details on whether hourly load-shape data or annual averages were used to calculate peak-hour capacity costs, making it difficult to assess their impact on the modified-PAC calculation.

101511Notice of Intervention - MEUs 1 passage
NOTICE OF INTERVENTION
NOTICE OF INTERVENTION TO: The Nova Scotia Energy Board ("Board") AND TO: EfficiencyOne ("E1") 1. The BERWICK ELECTRIC COMMISSION, the RIVERPORT ELECTRIC LIGHT COMMISSION, the TOWN OF MAHONE BAY, and the TOWN OF ANTIGONISH (collectively, t...

AI summary The Berwick Electric Commission, Riverport Electric Light Commission, Town of Mahone Bay, and Town of Antigonish (MEUs) seek intervenor status in a Nova Scotia Energy Board proceeding, citing their interest in rates and the Spill Tariff. They purchase power from Nova Scotia Power under municipal and BUTU rates and are directly affected by the Spill Tariff through their ownership and relationship with its sole customer.

102579Letter NSPI re: requests that its third-party experts, Sanem Sergici and/or Sai Shetty of The Brattle Group, participate virtually 1 passage
SELECTED CONSULTING EXPERIENCE p. p. 30
- such as target pilot customer, target recruitment samples, and pilot evaluation plans. Brattle also assisted EPE with recruitment strategies for customer enrollment in the pilots. - Rate Impact Analysis for Nevada Energy. As part of Neva...

AI summary The text outlines various consulting projects involving rate impact analysis, cost allocation reviews, and load impact evaluations for multiple utilities. These projects include work for Nevada Energy, the University of Alaska, People's Electric Cooperative, and a Missouri electric utility, focusing on aspects such as demand-side management, rate design, and transmission cost allocation.

103538Closing Submission - NS Power 1 passage
5.0 SCOPING OF RESEARCH INITIATIVES During this proceeding, new research initiatives emerged following the execution of the Study Agreements: • incentive level study between E1 and the CA; • hybrid heating study between E1 and EE; and an • interruptible customer DR participation study between E1 and the IG. In all three agreements E1 has committed to be "solely responsible for all costs associated with engaging the mutually agreed third-party consultant to conduct the Study, as well as any costs associated with the implementation of a pilot."[80](#page-29-1) During the hearing, E1 confirmed that costs associated with these initiatives would be funded through the existing budgets contemplated within the Plan, including through enabling strategies, though that the ultimate funding source depends on how the initiatives are scoped and implemented.[81](#page-29-2) NS Power respectfully submits that the Board should consider directing E1 to provide detailed plans and processes for each of the Study Agreements prior to finalizing the scope to ensure all affected parties' views are reasonably considered. Those plans should be documented and discussed with the DSMAG in advance of implementation. NS Power submits that E1 should be required to provide and make the following available to the DSMAG: • Study scope and objectives; • Methodology; • Governance framework; • Stakeholder engagement plan; p. pp. 30-31
ity-related benefits could be overstated, avoided costs could be mischaracterized, and DSM incentives could be directed toward load reductions already reflected in broader system planning assumptions. During cross-examination, the Company...

AI summary The proceeding discusses the need for NS Power to ensure that E1 provides detailed plans for study agreements, particularly regarding stakeholder engagement and integration with system planning considerations. Concerns are raised about the potential mischaracterization of benefits and costs related to demand-side management initiatives.

103632Reply Submission - IG 1 passage
2. NSPI INVOLVEMENT IN THE SMART SYNERGY/LIIR PARTICIPATION STUDY p. p. 2
2. NSPI INVOLVEMENT IN THE SMART SYNERGY/LIIR PARTICIPATION STUDY NSPI's Closing Submissions request that it be involved, from the outset, in the scoping and data collection phases of the Smart Synergy/LIIR participation study agreed to by...

AI summary NSPI requests early involvement in the Smart Synergy/LIIR participation study to ensure its operational expertise and data access are considered in tariff design and system value assessments. The IG supports this request, emphasizing that NSPI's involvement will improve the study's quality and ensure operational and reliability considerations are addressed.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →