Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Transmission Planning" in M10473

Matter: E-ENS-R-22 EfficiencyOne 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan Application
15 passages 4 documents

Transmission Planning across all matters →

E-15NSPI (IG) RIR-1 to RIR-3 12 passages
Section 2 p. p. 2
1 feeders, substation transformers, reactive support, and other capacity-related line 2 equipment. The 2021 avoided T&D costs are set out in the table below:

AI summary The text mentions avoided T&D costs in 2021, including feeders, substation transformers, reactive support, and other capacity-related line equipment, as outlined in a table.

3 p. p. 2
3 Avoided T&D Costs Transmission $/kW-yr Distribution $/kW-yr Total $/kW-yr Constrained System $71.58 $62.32 $133.90 System-Wide $23.20 $20.20 $43.40 4

AI summary The table presents avoided transmission and distribution costs for constrained and system-wide scenarios, with values provided in dollars per kilowatt-year. The constrained system has higher costs compared to the system-wide scenario.

Preamble p. p. 2
13 Please refer to Attachment 1 for a summary of the Avoided T&D Costs methodology in 14 addition to the Avoided T&D Costs values for 2020 that were based on Capital Project 15 spending between 2010 and 2019 16 17 Please refer to Attachmen...

AI summary The text refers to attachments containing summaries and calculations related to Avoided T&D Costs for 2020 and 2021, based on capital project spending over specific periods. It also cites a reference to page 263 of E1's Application.

AVOIDED T&D COSTS METHODOLOGY: p. pp. 5-6
AVOIDED T&D COSTS METHODOLOGY: - Data Source: 10 years of NS Power Project Data - Measure: Average Annual Costs ($/yr) x Carrying Charge Annual System Peak Load Growth (kW) - For each year, identify: - Projects required due to load growth...

AI summary The methodology calculates avoided transmission and distribution (T&D) costs by analyzing 10 years of NS Power project data. It identifies growth-related projects, adjusts costs for inflation, calculates average annual costs, applies a carrying charge, and determines historical load growth rates to estimate avoided T&D expenses.

Avoided Transmission Costs : p. p. 6
Avoided Transmission Costs : = Carrying Costs for Transmission Growth Projects ($/yr) Annual Constrained System Growth (kW)

AI summary The document introduces a formula to calculate carrying costs for transmission growth projects, correlating annual constrained system growth in kilowatts to annual costs in dollars. This framework is central to analyzing avoided transmission costs within the regulatory proceeding.

Avoided Transmission Costs : p. p. 7
Avoided Transmission Costs : = Carrying Costs for Transmission Growth Projects ($/yr) Annual System-Wide Growth (kW)

AI summary The text presents a formula relating annual system-wide growth in kW to carrying costs for transmission growth projects, highlighting the relationship between transmission expansion and associated financial impacts.

HISTORIC ANNUAL GROWTH p. pp. 8-9
HISTORIC ANNUAL GROWTH - The historic annual growth rate for the 10-year period in question is a system-wide value. - Growth rate is determined from the Coincident Peak Demand with Future DSM Program Effects data published in the annual 10...

AI summary The historic annual growth rate for a 10-year period is calculated using system-wide data from the annual 10-Year System Outlook Report, specifically the 'Coincident Peak Demand with Future DSM Program Effects' metric based on System Peak (MW). This rate is applied to both Constrained System and System-Wide data to determine T&D growth in kW for the current year.

ANNUAL SYSTEM SNAPSHOT REPORT p. pp. 10-11
ANNUAL SYSTEM SNAPSHOT REPORT NS power performs a high-level Annual System Snapshot of its system based on the peak load hour of the year. The report is used to flag potential loading issues and to identify substations that may require mor...

AI summary NS Power's Annual System Snapshot Report identifies loading issues and substations needing study by analyzing transformer loads, feeder loads, and voltages during peak hours. Reports from 2016-2019 informed the Avoided T&D Costs methodology, with expanded tables in the Nov 16, 2020 spreadsheet.

AVOIDED T&D COSTS ASSUMPTIONS: INCLUSIONS p. pp. 11-12
AVOIDED T&D COSTS ASSUMPTIONS: INCLUSIONS System upgrade costs directly related to load growth that are included in Avoided T&D Cost Calculations: - Transmission capacity infrastructure upgrades - New substations (capacity/contingency capa...

AI summary The document outlines system upgrade costs directly tied to load growth that are included in Avoided T&D Cost calculations. These include transmission capacity upgrades, substation expansions, distribution feeders, voltage compensation devices, and reliability-driven infrastructure improvements related to load growth.

AVOIDED T&D COSTS ASSUMPTIONS: EXCLUSIONS p. pp. 12-13
AVOIDED T&D COSTS ASSUMPTIONS: EXCLUSIONS System upgrade costs not directly related to load growth that are not avoidable and that are excluded in Avoided T&D Cost Calculations: - Transmission or distribution infrastructure replacements /...

AI summary The document outlines exclusions in Avoided T&D Cost Calculations, specifying that system upgrade costs unrelated to load growth (e.g., infrastructure replacements due to deterioration, reliability upgrades, and voltage conversions) are not considered avoidable. These exclusions clarify which capital expenditures are excluded from T&D cost savings assumptions.

METHOD RESULTS UPDATE p. p. 13
METHOD RESULTS UPDATE Avoided T&D Costs Transmission $/kW -yr Distribution $/kW -yr Total $/kW -yr Constrained System $73 33 $49 86 $123 19 Wide System $24 23 $16 99 $41 22 1. Note that a power Factor of 0.97 has been applied as a system a...

AI summary The document provides an update on method results, showing avoided transmission and distribution costs for constrained and wide systems. A power factor of 0.97 was applied to convert kVA growth to kW growth for both systems.

CHANGES REQUIRED TO NS POWER DATA p. pp. 14-15
CHANGES REQUIRED TO NS POWER DATA Upon approval of the Avoided T&D Costs Methodology, the following additions would be required for NS Power project justification documentation: - 1. Clearly identify load growth-related projects - 2. Publi...

AI summary NS Power must update project justification documentation post-approval of the Avoided T&D Costs Methodology by (1) identifying load growth-related projects, (2) publishing a simplified annual Load Snapshot Report, and (3) mapping constrained T&D system areas to improve transparency and planning.

E-25-(ii)Resume of K. Takahashi 1 passage
OTHER RELEVENT WORK p. p. 0
OTHER RELEVENT WORK • Currently assessing Puget Sound Energy's Energize Eastside project proposal on behalf of the City of Newcastle. The focus of this assessment is on (a) the reasonableness of the utility's historical loads and load fore...

AI summary The text outlines various energy-related assessments and projects, including evaluating Puget Sound Energy's Energize Eastside proposal, assisting with renewable heating and cooling frameworks, supporting EPA's Clean Power Plan analysis, and reviewing integrated resource plans for multiple states and utilities. It also details work on energy efficiency programs, COMFITs development, and deep energy retrofit analyses.

E-30E1 Compliance Filing 2023-2025 with Appendix A-D FINAL 1 passage
Table 4 p. p. 182
Table 4 Avoided T&D Costs – System Wide Year Transmission ($/kW-yr.) Distribution ($/kW-yr.) Total ($/kW-yr.) 2021 23.20 20.20 43.40 2022 $23.66 $20.60 $44.27 2023 $24.14 $21.02 $45.15 2024 $24.62 $21.44 $46.06 2025 $25.11 $21.87 $46.98 20...

AI summary Table 4 presents avoided transmission and distribution costs from 2021 to 2063, showing an increasing trend in costs over time. The table also includes a section on the Demand Response DRSim Model, indicating a focus on demand-side management and simulation tools.

86172Munis (E1) IR-1 to IR-9 1 passage
12 Questions:
12 Questions: 13 14 (a) Please confirm that the Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) and Program Administrator 15 Cost Test (PAC) were conducted assuming that all energy and capacity savings were 16 calculated using the annual avoided costs of e...

AI summary The document includes several questions directed to EfficiencyOne (E1) regarding the Total Resource Cost Test (TRC), Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC), and Demand Response (DR) under the 2023-2025 DSM Plan. Questions focus on avoided costs, transmission and distribution projects, and the impact of DSM spending on specific service territories and rate classes.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →