Topic:"Transmission Planning" in M12282

with environmental regulations and Direct Testimony of David G. Hill, Ph.D. / May 16, 2025. Page 10 On Behalf of EfficiencyOne DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 12 of 18 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Appendix A Data Sour...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's benefit-cost analysis test application discusses data sources and references for transmission and distribution capacity, including the use of forward-looking avoided costs from the 2023-2025 DSM Plan and the allocation of costs between transmission and distribution.

other general system impacts. 21 Table 8 provides a brief description and examples of electric system impacts. Table 8: Electric System Impact Definitions Impact Type Utility System Impact Description and Examples The production or procure...

AI summary The text discusses electric system impacts, including energy generation, capacity, environmental compliance, market price effects, and transmission capacity. Table 8 provides definitions and examples of these impacts, such as line losses, compliance with renewable standards, and wholesale market price changes.

energyfuturesgroup.com 37 shaded cells indicate an impact that was not included or only partially included in the 2023- 2025 DSM Plan BCA test. Table 9: Generation, Transmission and Distribution USIs Impact Type Impact EE DR DG DS EV BE En...

AI summary The table outlines the impact of various energy efficiency (EE), demand response (DR), distributed generation (DG), demand-side management (DS), electric vehicles (EV), and building efficiency (BE) initiatives on generation, transmission, and distribution utility system impacts (USIs). Shaded cells indicate partial or no inclusion in the 2023-2025 DSM Plan BCA test.

- 3 framework. 1 Request IR-05: 2 3 Refer to Table 3 on pages 10 and 11 of the Evidence of David Hill. 4 5 (a) Please describe the basis for allocating 50% of transmission and distribution capacity to 6 transmission and 50% to distribution...

AI summary The response to Request IR-05 explains that the 50/50 split between transmission and distribution costs is a simplifying assumption made by EFG, based on NS Power's data on avoided transmission and distribution costs. The response also references a table showing avoided transmission and distribution costs over time.