Topic:"2023-2026 DSM Plan" in M06733

12 11 In addition to the evaluated energy savings for the 2014 DSM Plan, evaluated energy savings for Codes and Standards in 2014 were 31.4 GWh. Savings from Codes and Standards are outside of DSM programs and therefore not included as a c...

AI summary The text discusses energy savings from the 2014 DSM Plan and Codes and Standards, noting that savings from the latter are not included in ENSC's UARB-approved target. It also references a DSM Settlement Agreement from 2012 that outlines evaluation processes for DSM programs, with a shift in evaluation practices from 2013 to 2014 and a commitment to full evaluations in 2015.

SOLAR 2014 DSM EVALUATION

AI summary The document references a 2014 Demand Side Management (DSM) evaluation, indicating a review or assessment of energy efficiency programs or initiatives undertaken during that year.

CUSTOM NEW CONSTRUCTION 2014 DSM EVALUATION 2014 DSM Evaluation Report

AI summary This document is titled 'CUSTOM NEW CONSTRUCTION 2014 DSM EVALUATION' and refers to a 2014 Demand Side Management (DSM) Evaluation Report. It appears to be a regulatory proceeding document related to energy efficiency programs.

Other Enabling Strategies 0.9 3 Total 42.6 150.5 136.3 21.0 2.1 3.9 0.5 Currency is expressed in 2016 dollars. Columns may not add correctly, due to rounding. Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC’s DSM Potential Study at the Base Le...

AI summary The text outlines avoided costs, TRC, PAC, and RIM metrics for energy efficiency programs, referencing ENS's 2015 DSM Resource Plan Settlement Agreement and NSPI's data. It includes a 2016-2018 EECA supply agreement and E1's responses to NSPI information requests.

2016-2018 DSM Plan Nova Scotia Power Evidence

AI summary The document outlines the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan submitted by Nova Scotia Power as evidence in a regulatory proceeding.

DATE FILED: April 10, 2015 Page 3 of 51 1 rate pressure for customers and avoids resource additions for capacity planning purposes 2 until 2032. 3 4 During the course of contract negotiations, NS Power had requested E1 to model a $10 5 mil...

AI summary NS Power requested E1 to model a DSM plan with a lower investment level, but E1 refused and instead proposed a higher spending plan. NS Power is concerned about E1's autonomy, flexibility, and the structure of deliverables and compensation.

Figure 3.6: Ranking of CRPs low and low to a mid-investment level. In terms of a revenue requirement analysis, the Low DSM energy and capacity savings for the $22 million expenditure plan again demonstrates superior near term affordability...

AI summary The text discusses the affordability and cost-effectiveness of different Demand Side Management (DSM) expenditure levels in the context of the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). It highlights that the 'Low' DSM energy and capacity savings plan offers superior near-term affordability while remaining cost-effective beyond 2030.

6/17). Similarly, the DSM Plan for Ontario is presented for a six year period (2015 – 2020). 20 EfficiencyOne and Efficiency Maine have not been included in the calculation of the average. Exhibit 7: 2015 Sector Breakdown of the Program Im...

AI summary The text discusses the structure and scope of Demand Side Management (DSM) plans in various jurisdictions, noting that Efficiency Nova Scotia's BNI programs serve both commercial and industrial customers and that ENSC offers one of the most comprehensive DSM portfolios in Canada, which may influence higher initial program costs.

(Tables to be populated by E1, based on the final 2016‐2018 DSM Plan as approved by the UARB.) Total 2016-2018 Program and Sub‐Component Cumulative Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator Cumulative Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator Un...

AI summary The document outlines tables for energy efficiency programs under the 2016–2018 DSM Plan approved by the UARB, including residential, business, and enabling strategies sectors, with metrics such as energy savings and unit costs. These tables are to be populated by E1.

(Technical tables to be provided and populated by E1, based on the final 2016‐2018 DSM Plan as approved by the UARB. NS Power recommends these tables include a column to identify program subcomponents.)

AI summary The document text refers to technical tables to be provided by E1, based on the final 2016-2018 DSM Plan approved by the UARB. NS Power suggests including a column to identify program subcomponents in these tables.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL - 1 Please note, the Company has not put forward a DSM plan for the Board's approval. Rather, NS - 2 Power has requested the Board consider our Evidence and direct E1 to design a plan that would - 3 provide DSM spending of...

AI summary The Company has not submitted a DSM plan for approval but has requested the Board to consider its evidence and direct E1 to design a plan with approximately $22 million in spending, aiming for 100 GWh/year in energy savings over the 2016-18 contract period.

2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary This document outlines NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate regarding the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, as part of the NSUARB proceeding M06733.

2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary The document refers to the 2016-2018 DSM Plan and NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate under NSUARB matter M06733.

ELECTRONIC 2016-2018 DSM Plan CA IR-20 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 1 No D SM Half-Lo w DSM Low DSM Base DSM Synapse I Mid DSM 2034 12146 0 _ 992 10174 1972 9555 2590 3251 2035 0 11203 1049 10166 2087 9523 2729 8846 3407 2036 0 1105 10161 2199 2...

AI summary The document presents a table with data related to the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, showing various metrics under different scenarios (e.g., No D, SM, Half-Lo, Low, Base, Synapse I, Mid DSM) for years 2034 to 2039. It includes percentages and numerical values across multiple categories, likely related to demand-side management programs and their impacts.

ELECTRONIC 2016-2018 DSM Plan CA IR-20 Attachment 2 Page 5 of 5 Syn aps id D e M SM 5 201 201 6 201 7 201 8 201 9 202 0 202 1 202 2 202 3 202 4 5 202 202 6 202 7 202 8 202 9 203 0 203 1 203 2 203 3 203 4 5 203 203 6 203 7 203 8 203 9 TUC 1...

AI summary The document presents a table with percentages related to the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, showing varying participation rates across different categories and years. The data reflects performance metrics for various entities and programs during the specified period.

ELECTRONIC 2016-2018 DSM Plan CA IR-20 Attachment 3 Page 8 of 10 Bas D SM e 202 8 202 9 203 0 203 1 203 2 203 3 203 4 5 203 203 6 203 7 203 8 203 9 TU 1 C $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ TU 2 C $ 150 .35 $ 154 .71 $ 154 .97...

AI summary This table presents financial data related to the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, including various cost figures for different units and years. It outlines projected costs for multiple categories, potentially related to demand-side management and energy efficiency initiatives.

ELECTRONIC 2016-2018 DSM Plan CA IR-20 Attachment 3 Page 9 of 10 Syn aps id D e M SM 201 5 201 6 201 7 201 8 201 9 202 0 202 1 202 2 202 3 202 4 202 5 202 6 202 7 ni U Ling 2 an $ $ 47. 81 $ 48. 34 $ 49. 38 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐...

AI summary The document presents a table with financial data related to the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, showing figures for various entities across multiple years. The data appears to be related to cost or revenue projections, but no explicit claims or arguments are discussed in the text.

$111 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) CA IR-20 Attachments 9-12 have been removed due to confidentiality. ELECTRONIC 2016-2018 DSM Plan CA IR-20 Attachment 13 Page 1 of 1

AI summary The document contains a redacted section of the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, with attachments 9-12 removed due to confidentiality. Attachment 13 is included but contains no visible content beyond the heading and page reference.

18 19 20 21 In cases where incremental wind was added (e.g. the No DSM Plan – 150 MW wind block in 2032) above the currently planned and committed wind as shown in CA IR-21, a capacity value of 12 percent was applied. 22 2016-2018 DSM Plan...

AI summary The text discusses the application of a 12% capacity value to incremental wind additions above planned levels, referencing the No DSM Plan – 150 MW wind block in 2032, and mentions the 2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) and NSPI responses to consumer advocate information requests.

Date Filed: May 19, 2015 NSPI (E1) IR-3 Page 2 of 2 2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to EfficiencyOne Information Requests

AI summary The document references the 2016-2018 DSM Plan and NSPI's responses to EfficiencyOne Information Requests, as part of a regulatory proceeding under NSUARB M06733.

2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to EfficiencyOne Information Requests 2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to EfficiencyOne Information Requests

AI summary This document pertains to the 2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) and includes NSPI's responses to EfficiencyOne's information requests. It is part of a regulatory proceeding related to demand-side management in Nova Scotia.

REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) CONFIDENTIAL E1 IR-12 Attachments 1-4 have been removed due to confidentiality and have been filed electronically. 2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to EfficiencyOne Information R...

AI summary The document references the 2016-2018 DSM Plan and NSPI's responses to EfficiencyOne information requests, with confidential attachments removed. It pertains to a regulatory proceeding involving demand-side management and Nova Scotia Power Inc.

1 Response IR-20: 2 3 (a) The DSM plan which NS Power discusses in its evidence and included as Appendix B is 4 not intended to be a detailed alternative for approval. However, for the current contract 5 period, the Company's evidence show...

AI summary NS Power discusses a DSM plan in its evidence, noting that it is not intended as a detailed alternative for approval. The plan aligns with energy and demand savings from the 'Low' DSM case, with costs between $20 and $25 million. The NPV difference between the Low DSM and Mid DSM cases is analyzed, showing $151M in savings for the Mid DSM over 25 years.

2016-2018 DSM Plan EOne IR-21 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 1 No DSM Plan CRP01-01-FGD-R01 Low DSM CRP2-17 FGD CRP Mid DSM/FGD Low DSM Half-Low DSM With Half-Low DSM Program Administrator Costs Base DSM (Synapse Model) With Low DSM Program Admini...

AI summary The document presents a comparison of different scenarios for the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan, including variations in program administrator costs and other factors. It includes a table with various projects, retirements, and capacity additions over time, along with NPV values and planning and study PV figures.

2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to EfficiencyOne Information Requests

AI summary This document outlines NSPI's responses to EfficiencyOne's information requests regarding the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, which was reviewed by the NSUARB under matter number M06733.

2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to EfficiencyOne Information Requests

AI summary This document references the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan and Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NSPI) responses to EfficiencyOne's information requests, as part of the NSUARB M06733 proceeding.

2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to EfficiencyOne Information Requests

AI summary The document refers to the 2016-2018 DSM Plan and NSPI's responses to EfficiencyOne's information requests, likely related to demand-side management initiatives and regulatory proceedings under the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.

2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to EfficiencyOne Information Requests 2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to EfficiencyOne Information Requests

AI summary This chunk refers to the 2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) and NSPI's responses to EfficiencyOne information requests, highlighting a regulatory proceeding related to demand-side management initiatives.

2 3 1 Figure 3.7: Annual Percent Difference in Partial Revenue Requirements Compared to No DSM Plan. 2 4

AI summary The figure illustrates the annual percent difference in partial revenue requirements compared to a scenario without a Demand Side Management (DSM) plan, highlighting the financial impact of implementing DSM initiatives.

Ε G В F C Low DSM Plan Scenario D DSM Plan Scenario D DSM Plan Net Cost (-) or Avoided Cost Incremental Annual Cumulative Energy Savings Scenario D Net Savings (+) Energy Savings Energy Savings \ (B \ D) (E + F)of Energy DSM Investment $/M...

AI summary The document presents two scenarios (Scenario D and E1 DSM Plan) for the Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan, detailing annual net savings or costs, energy savings, and DSM investments from 2015 to 2031. The data highlights the financial implications and energy savings associated with each plan over time.

ECOLOGY ACTION CENTRE Jamie Thompson Elizabeth Chant INDUSTRIAL GROUP Nancy G. Rubin, Q.C. Maggie A. Stewart, LL.B. NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Stephen McGrath, LL.B. Nancy Rondeaux PORT HAWKESBURY PAPER LP James MacDuff, LL.B. BOARD...

AI summary The Board approved a DSM Plan for 2016-2018 with a total budget of $102,150,000, allocating $33,210,000 in 2016, $34,020,000 in 2017, and $34,920,000 in 2018. The decision was made on August 12, 2015, following hearings in June 2015 and final submissions by July 15, 2015.

Lagend: Filing has not historically triggered an automatic regulatory Filing has historically tr riggered a regulatory process 2019-2021 DSM Plan Filing End of February Based on standardized (ling agreed to/ordered by the CARB Rate and bil...

AI summary The document outlines various filings and reports related to energy efficiency and demand-side management in Nova Scotia. It includes timelines for submissions such as the DSM Plan, evaluation reports, financial statements, and progress reports. It also mentions regular meetings with the Demand-Side Management Advisory Group (DSMAG).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: - 1. The Board approves a DSM Plan for 2016-2018 in the aggregate amount of $102,150,000 with a target of total cumulative energy savings of 405.9 GWh and demand savings of 62.5 MW. Approved spending is $33,210,0...

AI summary The Board has approved a DSM Plan for 2016-2018 with a total budget of $102,150,000, setting energy and demand savings targets. It also approved a supply agreement between E1 and NSPI, and directed E1 and NSPI to file various reports and analyses, including on financing deferrals, accounting treatments, and locational DSM efforts.

2013-2015 DSM Plan process. Due to the enhanced tracking, which is expected to automatically remove duplication of customers across programs, the new system is expected to result in efficiencies to the manual process ENS must complete for...

AI summary The 2013-2015 DSM Plan process is being enhanced with new tracking systems to reduce duplication and improve efficiency in ENS's manual filing process. Investments in these systems will continue through 2016-2018.

2016-2018 DSM Plan Nova Scotia Power Closing Submission

AI summary Nova Scotia Power submitted its closing submission for the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Plan, which outlines energy efficiency and demand-side management initiatives.

ion any alternative 27 DSM plans or scenarios for the Board to consider in fulfilling its statutory obligation of 28 determining whether the DSM programs proposed by E1 were affordable and in the best 1 Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989,...

AI summary NS Power argues that E1's DSM Plan is not affordable and does not meet regulatory compliance obligations, proposing instead a more measured plan with annual energy savings of 100 GWh at a cost of $22 million per year. The Board is requested to direct E1 to develop a more affordable alternative.

& lt;sup>10 Ibid, page 169, lines 8-10. 1 2 3 MR. CRANDLEMIRE: I'm not clear what data you're referring to. 4 MR. CLARKE: All of the analysis respecting whatever it is you 5 described the $35 million initial plan or however you describe it...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the submission of a single Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan by E1 to the Board, which is criticized as inconsistent with the Board's consultant's recommendation to consider multiple scenarios. The Board's need for comprehensive data and alternative scenarios is emphasized.

DATE FILED: July 8, 2015 Page 11 of 50 11 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan (M06733), Transcript, June 16, 2015, pages 526-527, lines 13-22 and lines 1-2. 12 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan (M06733), Transcript,...

AI summary NS Power argues that E1's failure to present alternative scenarios in the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan (M06733) prevents a full examination of affordability and does not meet statutory requirements to justify the proposed plan.

THE NSPI POSITION IN THIS PROCEEDING The Consumer Advocate makes the following comments in relation to the position adopted by NSPI in this proceeding. NSPI does not demonstrate that it is possible to design a reasonable DSM plan at a $22...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate criticizes NSPI's position in the proceeding, arguing that NSPI's proposed DSM plan at a $22 million per year spending level is not reasonable and that its 'Alternative Plan' is not a viable portfolio as it is only an illustration.

2016-2018 DSM Plan Nova Scotia Power Reply to Closing Submissions

AI summary Nova Scotia Power provides a reply to closing submissions related to the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Plan, which outlines energy efficiency and demand reduction initiatives.

& lt;sup>10 CA Closing Submission, July 8, 2015, p. 4. 1 accurate reflection of the evidence. NS Power refers the Board to Table 1 of NS 2 Power's Rebuttal Evidence, which shows that Scenario D provides more DSM at 3 the residential level...

AI summary NS Power addresses the CA's claims regarding the DSM Plan, clarifying that Scenario D provides more DSM at the residential level than the proposed E1 DSM Plan. NS Power also explains that they did not use a constant load shape and considered the benefits of reduced energy load in their analysis.

E1 Closing Submission, July 8, 2015, page 18, lines 8-10. 192016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan (M06733), Transcript, June 18, 2015, pages 662-663. 1 2 Mr. Blunden testified that the Company was only using jurisdictional benchma...

AI summary The document discusses the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan (M06733) and the use of benchmarking by NS Power. Mr. Blunden testified that NS Power used benchmarking for guidance on DSM costs in Canada, noting that their spending was higher than other jurisdictions. NS Power also pointed out that the proposed E1 DSM Plan's impact on load was double the average of three Canadian jurisdictions. Mr. Pickles criticized the benchmarking methodology used by Mr. Dunsky, stating it lacked quantitative support.

& lt;sup>47 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan (M06733), Transcript, June 18, 2015, page 634, lines 2-16. 48 E1 Closing Submission, July 8, 2015, page 41, lines 20-21.

AI summary The text references the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan and a closing submission by E1, citing specific documents and pages.

ECOLOGY ACTION CENTRE Jamie Thompson Elizabeth Chant INDUSTRIAL GROUP Nancy G. Rubin, Q.C. Maggie A. Stewart, LL.B. NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Stephen McGrath, LL.B. Nancy Rondeaux PORT HAWKESBURY PAPER LP James MacDuff, LL.B. BOARD...

AI summary The Board approved a DSM Plan for 2016-2018 with a total budget of $102,150,000, allocating $33,210,000 in 2016, $34,020,000 in 2017, and $34,920,000 in 2018. The decision was made on August 12, 2015, following hearings in June 2015 and final submissions in July 2015.

Lagend: Filing has not historically triggered an automatic regulatory Filing has historically tr riggered a regulatory process 2019-2021 DSM Plan Filing End of February Based on standardized (ling agreed to/ordered by the CARB Rate and bil...

AI summary The document outlines a timeline and requirements for various filings and reports related to the 2019-2021 DSM Plan, including the submission of financial statements, impact evaluations, and meetings with the DSMAG. It emphasizes the need for standardized filings and periodic reporting.

Appendix A Schedule E EECA Plan (2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan)

AI summary This document presents the Energy Efficiency Conservation Agency (EECA) Plan for the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, which outlines strategies and initiatives aimed at improving energy efficiency and managing demand for electricity in Nova Scotia.

212 Summary of EfficiencyOne's proposed DSM plan 2016-20182 - EfficiencyOne's proposed plan calls for an investment of $121.5 million over a three year period –

AI summary EfficiencyOne's proposed DSM plan for 2016-20182 calls for an investment of $121.5 million over three years.

Summary of Quantum Agreement 4 On June 16, 2015, E1 entered into an agreement ("Quantum Agreement") with the Consumer Advocate, Small Business Advocate, Affordable Energy Coalition, and Ecology Action Centre. Some of the highlights are as...

AI summary In June 2015, E1 entered into a Quantum Agreement with several stakeholders, including the Consumer Advocate and Ecology Action Centre, to reduce investment in DSM activities from $121.5 million to $113.5 million over 2016-2018. The agreement outlines energy and demand savings targets and a commitment to develop a cost-effectiveness screening test methodology for future DSM plans.