C-4NSPI Response to Appeal (redacted)
4 passages
following summary of activities and communications pertaining to REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) April 21, 2026 L. Wallace the March 31, 2026 DRO decision being appealed by CAPE: • March 25, 2026 – Ashlee Wiseman contacted the...
AI summary CAPE appeals a DRO decision regarding a disputed NS Power bill. Communications include customer inquiries about billing discrepancies, DRO procedural steps, and NS Power's submission of its position. Key issues involve billing accuracy, account documentation, and dispute resolution processes.
the account. This is referenced on page 6 of 16 in the DRO file attached as Confidential Attachment 1. • March 31, 2026 – NS Power provided its position to DRO, stating the following: We are continuing to work on restoring all regular serv...
AI summary NS Power informed the DRO that following a cyber incident, meter reconnection to the billing system is ongoing, leading to estimated bills for certain months. NS Power apologized for inconvenience, noting discrepancies will be corrected in future bills, with the March 2026 bill serving as a reconciliation for prior estimated usage.
n bill and was a double bill to include service Page 2 of 4 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) April 21, 2026 L. Wallace between November 5, 2025 to March 3, 2026. It is NS Power's position that the customer has been billed approp...
AI summary NS Power defends billing accuracy for a customer who received a double bill, citing estimated meter readings leading to discrepancies reconciled later with actual readings. The DRO's decision explains that estimated usage was lower than actual, resulting in a 4-month bill in March 2026.
nth May 2025 to March 2026 periods was clearly lower than actual usage. N.S. Power did not bill you in January resulting in a 4 month bill in March. Final Written DRO Decision: In the context of Board approved Regulation 5.1, N.S.Power has...
AI summary NS Power billed a customer for four months due to initial estimated billing errors, leading to a DRO decision upholding the billing. CAPE appealed this decision to the NSEB, while NS Power affirmed the DRO's ruling and offered payment options to resolve the balance.