N-1Redacted Work Order
14 passages
An Emera Company UARB APPROVAL SHEET Project Title: TRES ~ Superheater, Reheater and Boiler Upgrades CI Number: 38724 • Capital Project Authorization 'Head Office Use: D ATO Project Number: D Final Cost Date: October 5,2010 Location: Divis...
AI summary The document outlines a capital project authorization for TRES ~ Superheater, Reheater and Boiler Upgrades with a budget estimate of $1,549,614 and a project estimate of $796,383. The project started in August 2010 and was expected to be completed by November 2010.
- TRE5 - Superheater, Reheater and Boiler Upgrades Project Number Parent Cl Number Cost Centre: 340 - 340-Trenton Unit 5 Capital Budget Version -
AI summary This document outlines a project titled 'TRE5 - Superheater, Reheater and Boiler Upgrades' under Cost Centre 340, associated with '340-Trenton Unit 5 Capital' and a specific budget version.
2010 07/05 Forecast rorecast Start : 08/01/2010 Operational: 09/15/2010 Final Cost : 11/15/2010 2010 $796,382.51 Total: $796,382.51 Original Cost $139,000.00 Oliginal Cools 4.00,000 The focus of this project will be to replace targeted sec...
AI summary The project aims to replace sections of a boiler, including tubes, piping, doors, and tanks, based on inspections and a Life Assessment Study from 2006, as well as subsequent inspections in 2007 and 2009. The forecast details the project's timeline and costs.
Summary of Related Cl's +/- 2 years: 2009 - 28529 TRE5 Secondary Superheater Outlet $1,538,427 CI Number : 38724 - TRE5 - Superheater, Reheater and Boiler Upgrades Project Number Parent Cl Number : Approved Date Cost Centre : 340 - 340-Tre...
AI summary This document provides a summary of a capital project related to the TRE5 plant, including the project name, cost, and budget version. The project involves upgrades to the superheater, reheater, and boiler at Trenton Unit 5.
Capital Item Justification Justification Criteria: THERMAL Sub-Criteria: Heat Rate Name of Report: Document Location: Person Responsible:
AI summary The document outlines a capital item justification process under the 'Thermal' category, with a sub-criteria focus on 'Heat Rate.' However, no detailed analysis, arguments, or specific data are provided in the excerpt.
Why do this project this way? This project is based on an engineering life cycle management report completed in 2006 and validated during recent boiler inspections. Past experience on other units indicates that this is the most effective w...
AI summary The project follows a 2006 engineering life cycle management report validated by recent boiler inspections and past experience. It is currently in progress, with a scope change noted in the ACE Version and a variance explanation sheet referenced. The project involves Trenton Unit 5 Capital under cost centre 340.
38724 - TRE5 Superheater, Reheater and Boiler Upgrades Account ACE 2010 Current Submission Variance 001 - THERMAL Regular Labour 100,000 70,500 (29,500) 004 - THERMAL Term Labour 100,000 10,600 (89,400) 012 - Materials 363,000 128,477 (234...
AI summary The document presents a comparison of costs for the TRE5 Superheater, Reheater, and Boiler Upgrades project at Trenton Generating Station between the ACE 2010 submission and the current submission, showing significant variances across various accounts.
It is recommended to perform upgrades to TRE5 boiler based on recommendations from inspections conducted during the 2006 Life is Extension Study. This economic analysis supports these recommendations. The upgrade costs versus the replaceme...
AI summary An economic analysis recommends upgrading the TRE5 boiler based on 2006 inspection findings, citing potential cost savings from avoiding unplanned outages and a favorable NPV of $1.4M and IRR of 25.8%.
TRE5 - Superheater, Reheater, and Boiler Upgrades 2010 Complete E Boiler Upgrade 2011 240,480.8 Year -Total Revenue -Operating Costs - CCA or UCC community der Applicable₁Taxes Discount Factor PV of CF CNPV -
AI summary The text outlines a table related to the TRE5 - Superheater, Reheater, and Boiler Upgrades, with financial details such as revenue, operating costs, and discount factors. It includes a year (2011) and monetary values, but lacks detailed explanations or arguments.
Re-Heat 2 Intermediate - Up Pass 2 - 3 - Tubes 11-30, 9 1/4 - 10th Floor The survey of this section revealed no mechanical work required.
AI summary The survey of the Re-Heat 2 Intermediate - Up Pass 2 - 3 - Tubes 11-30, 9 1/4 - 10th Floor section found no mechanical work required, indicating no immediate capital expenditures or infrastructure planning actions are necessary for this specific location.
To perform the work outlined above. we quote an estimated price of ........ REDACTED CI 38724 Page 47 of 56 Pages 47 to 56 have been removed due to confidentiality. NSPI - 2010 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (2010-2014) - P-128.09 NSPI Re...
AI summary The document outlines an estimated price for a quoted work and references a redacted section of a page from a regulatory proceeding. It also mentions the 2010 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan by NSPI and responses to UARB Information Requests.
REDACTED 1 Generation Responses 2 3 Request m-G16: . 4 5 With respect to page 41, CI# 38724, TRE5 - Superheater, Reheater and Boiler Upgrades, 6 7 a) Please provide copies of correspondence, studies and reports that require this work be 8...
AI summary The document discusses a request for information regarding the 2010 capital expenditure plan of NSPI, specifically related to boiler upgrades and associated costs. NSPI provided confidential attachments and explained the redaction of personnel and cost information to protect privacy and competitive advantage.
Executive Summary: During the 2006 annual shutdown, the Boiler Blow Down Tank was inspected. It was found that the tank, was in relatively poor condition. For life extension, the recommendation is to do a complete replacement of the tank a...
AI summary The Boiler Blow Down Tank, installed in 1969 and in poor condition due to failed stainless steel liner and repeated repairs, requires replacement for life extension. The capital cost for replacing the tank and discharge line is estimated but not quantified in the text.
Capital Estimate: Inspection budget estimate with supporting documentation if available. - M Contl'act Costs (Tank & Pipe Fabricator) Contract Costs (Tank & Pipe Installation) -Material Costs (Insulation/Cladding) Contraot Costs (Insulatio...
AI summary The document outlines a capital estimate for inspection-related costs, including contract expenses for tank and pipe fabrication/installation, material costs for insulation/cladding, and engineering/administration fees. Supporting documentation is referenced but not detailed in the text.
N-2Responses to Information Requests 1/12/2011
4 passages
DEFINITION 01 Capital assets include identifiable assets such as property, plant and equipment or intangible assets that are held for use in the production or supply of goods and services. They are intended for use on a continuing basis an...
AI summary Capital assets are defined as identifiable assets (property, plant, equipment, intangible) held for use in producing/supplying goods/services, not for sale. The definition references the CICA Handbook, 3061.04.
GENERAL 02 An expenditure must create a benefit having a life of more than one year to be considered capital. Annual fees or maintenance costs do not create an asset; they simply maintain the existing asset base and should be expensed annu...
AI summary The text outlines criteria for capitalizing expenditures, emphasizing that only those providing benefits beyond one year qualify. Annual maintenance and fees are expensed immediately. Capital expenditures are recorded as assets, reducing future earnings via depreciation and amortization. Guidance is referenced from U.S. regulatory bodies.
POLICIES 07 Expenditures meeting the criteria described in Paragraphs 02 and 03 create a benefit that will be realized by the Company beyond the current year. Accordingly, they should be capitalized. 08 Expenditures should not be capitaliz...
AI summary The policies outline criteria for capitalizing expenditures, stating that such costs should be capitalized if they provide benefits beyond the current year. Conversely, expenditures without reasonably certain future benefits should not be capitalized.
PROCEDURES 09 Every expenditure must be classified as either capital or operating, and should be budgeted and accounted for accordingly. Operating costs are expensed in the year incurred, against the revenue earned in that period. The dete...
AI summary The text outlines procedures for classifying expenditures as capital or operating, emphasizing materiality considerations, the use of the Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan), and the Oracle General Ledger System for tracking costs.