Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Complaint Resolution" in M12972

Matter: NSPI Complaint - Billing Issues - David Nickerson
19 passages 16 documents

Complaint Resolution across all matters →

102858Board Decision re Request for Confidentially (redacted) 1 passage
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION Under Board Regulatory Rule 12, you requested confidential treatment of certain personal identifiers. As noted above, your mailing/civic address, your NS Power account number, your personal email address, your telephone number a...

AI summary The Board denied a request for confidential treatment of a complainant's full name, finding no serious risk to a public interest. The full name will be made public in all filings related to the matter. The complainant may withdraw the complaint within seven days of the decision.

103079Cover Letter - Redacted 3 passages
Nature of the Complaint
Nature of the Complaint I am filing a formal complaint with the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) against Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) regarding: - 1. An unresolved billing dispute in the amount of $635.22, which I believe repre...

AI summary A customer has filed a formal complaint with the Nova Scotia Energy Board against Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, citing an unresolved billing dispute of $635.22 and the company's failure to resolve the issue through internal and external dispute resolution processes despite the customer's good-faith efforts.

What I Am Asking the NSEB to Do
What I Am Asking the NSEB to Do I respectfully request that the NSEB: - 1. Direct NS Power to conduct an internal review of my billing account for the period covered by the dispute, using its own records, and to apply a credit of $635.22 (...

AI summary The complainant requests the NSEB to direct NS Power to review their billing account, assess the handling of their complaint, evaluate systemic issues in customer service, and address ongoing security concerns related to account information transmission following a data breach.

Documents Enclosed
Documents Enclosed The following documents are filed with this complaint: - NSEB Rule12 Confidentiality Request filed pursuant to Regulatory Rule 12 - NSEB Statement of Complaint (including billing dispute details, full communication chron...

AI summary The complaint includes a confidentiality request under Regulatory Rule 12 and a detailed statement of complaint from the NSEB, covering billing disputes and communication history.

103081Appellant Request for Confidentiality - redacted 1 passage
REDACTEDPage 4 of 4
REDACTEDPage 4 of 4 This request is filed with the Board concurrently with my Statement of Complaint and Cover Letter, and will be served on Nova Scotia Power Incorporated as the respondent party, in accordance with Rule 12(4)(c). Respectf...

AI summary A complaint is filed with the Board, concurrently with a Statement of Complaint and Cover Letter, and is served on Nova Scotia Power Incorporated as the respondent party in accordance with Rule 12(4)(c). The submission is signed by David Nickerson on July 12, 2026.

103091Appellant Response to Decision - Redacted 1 passage
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Subject: My decision - RE: Request for extension of...

AI summary The sender disagrees with the Board's decision to disclose their full name but agrees to proceed with the complaint. They request confirmation of the complaint's status and next steps, as well as receipt of Nova Scotia Power's filings and correspondence.

103152Board Acknowledgment Letter (redacted) 1 passage
Section 1
August 5, 2026 David Nickerson Dear Complainant: M12972 – Nova Scotia Power Inc. – Billing Complaint by David NICKERSON This will acknowledge receipt of your correspondence received by the Board on July 14, 2026. A copy of the complaint an...

AI summary The Board acknowledges a billing complaint filed by David Nickerson against Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power). NS Power is requested to respond to the complaint by August 19, 2026, and disconnection notices on the property are placed on hold until a decision is made.

103203Board Letter re Public Record (redacted) 1 passage
Section 1
August 13, 2026 David Nickerson Dear Mr. Nickerson: M12972 – NSPI Complaint – Billing Issues – David Nickerson Thank you for your email of August 7, 2026. In response to your questions regarding a withdrawal, I can confirm that if you choo...

AI summary The Chief Clerk of the Board, Lisa Wallace, responds to David Nickerson regarding the withdrawal of his complaint (M12972). She explains that withdrawal would remove all documents from public access and that no paper documents exist. She also notes that public access to unredacted documents has been rare and that the Board may deny requests if deemed improper.

103244Appellants Extension Request re Rule 12 Request for Confidentiality (redacted) 1 passage
Section 2
t have counsel on retainer for this matter. Seven days is a very short period in which to understand the ruling, the Rule 12(12) options, and the practical effect of proceeding versus withdrawing. - 3. Hearing impairment and email-only com...

AI summary The complainant requests an extension to August 12, 2026, to decide whether to proceed or withdraw from the complaint due to hearing impairment, concerns related to a cybersecurity breach, and the complexity of the underlying issues involving billing, customer care, and information security.

103249Appellant Correspondence - Clarification re Board Letter d. August 5, 2026 (redacted) 1 passage
Section 1
From: Sent: August 5, 2026 9:40 PM To: Wallace, Lisa Cc: Penney, Nicole Subject: Re: M12972 - NSPI Complaint - Billing Issues - David Nickerson \ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking...

AI summary The email inquires about the public accessibility of complaint documents filed with the Board, specifically asking about the meaning of 'they' and 'others' in the context of redacted and un-redacted formats, and whether personal identifiers are accessible to the general public or only authorized entities.

103250Board's Reply to Appellant - Clarification re Board Letter d. August 5, 2026 (redacted) 1 passage
Preamble
From: Wallace, Lisa Sent: August 6, 2026 8:36 AM To: Cc: Penney, Nicole Subject: RE: M12972 - NSPI Complaint - Billing Issues - David Nickerson

AI summary An email from Lisa Wallace to Nicole Penney regarding a complaint (M12972) filed by David Nickerson with NSPI concerning billing issues. The email provides context for the complaint and likely initiates a regulatory process to address the concerns raised.

103255Appellant Follow Up to Board re Public Record Letter d. August 13, 2026 (redacted) 1 passage
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Subject: RE: Situation of complaint withdrawal — Fo...

AI summary The complainant disputes the Board's claim that their civic/mailing address can be disclosed under the open court principle, arguing that this contradicts the Board's previous Rule 12 ruling which excluded such information from public disclosure. They request clarification on the legal authority for the disclosure and whether the Board's position has changed.

103256Board Acknowledgment to Appellants Follow Up re Public Record Letter d. August 13, 2026 (redacted) 1 passage
Preamble
From: Wallace, Lisa Sent: August 18, 2026 9:10 AM To: Cc: Penney, Nicole ; Blake WIlliams ; Carley Freeman ; Chris Lanteigne ; Jennifer Ross ; Lisa Forsey ; Sofia Reiner ; Sonia Liao ; Kathleen Murray Subject: RE: M12972 - NSPI Complaint -...

AI summary This email is a follow-up regarding a complaint (M12972) from David Nickerson concerning billing issues with NSPI. Lisa Wallace is communicating with multiple stakeholders, including representatives from Nova Scotia Power and the Nova Scotia government.

103257Appellant Correspondence re 15-Day Deadline and Outstanding Questions (redacted) 2 passages
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Subject: RE: Situation of complaint withdrawal — 15...

AI summary The writer is concerned that their previous letter regarding the Board's answer to question 4(b) about the open court principle has not been adequately addressed. They highlight a contradiction between the Board's own ruling on their case and a recent statement that their address is subject to disclosure under the open court principle.

4. My request
4. My request I would ask that: - · The 15-day deadline be paused until I receive a substantive response to the outstanding questions above. - · The Board confirm whether this correspondence has been placed on the formal record of my compl...

AI summary The complainant is requesting a pause in the 15-day deadline until they receive a substantive response to outstanding questions and is asking the Board to confirm whether their correspondence has been placed on the formal record. They also request escalation if it has not been reviewed by the assigned Board Member. The complainant insists that their address should not be disclosed publicly without clear legal authority and is willing to withdraw the complaint if such authority is identified.

103259Appellant Clarification re His Final Decision (redacted) 1 passage
Section 1
From: Sent: August 19, 2026 12:34 AM To: Wallace, Lisa Cc: Penney, Nicole ; Blake WIlliams ; Carley Freeman ; Chris Lanteigne ; Jennifer Ross ; Lisa Forsey ; Sofia Reiner ; Sonia Liao ; Kathleen Murray Subject: RE: M12972 - NSPI Complaint...

AI summary David Nickerson clarifies that he is not withdrawing his complaint and reiterates his position that the Board must identify the legal authority allowing public disclosure of his civic address, which conflicts with Rule 12's ruling that his address will not be made public.

103293Board Letter re Public Access and Confidentiality (redacted) 1 passage
Section 1
August 24, 2026 Dear Mr. Nickerson: M12972 - NSPI Complaint - Billing Issues Thank you for your email. The Board has explained its process and stated that all personal identifiers would be redacted, with the exception of your name. The Boa...

AI summary The Board has confirmed that personal identifiers in the M12972 - NSPI Complaint - Billing Issues file will remain confidential, except for the complainant's name. An exception to the normal process has been made to address the complainant's concerns regarding privacy and access to the file.

103326Appellants Confirmation to Proceed with Appeal (redacted) 1 passage
Section 1
From: Sent: August 24, 2026 5:05 PM To: Penney, Nicole Cc: Wallace, Lisa ; Blake WIlliams ; Carley Freeman ; Chris Lanteigne ; Jennifer Ross ; Kathleen Murray ; Lisa Forsey ; Sofia Reiner ; Sonia Liao Subject: Re: M12972 NSPI Complaint - B...

AI summary David Nickerson confirms his intention to proceed with his complaint (M12972) after the Board agreed to keep his personal identifiers confidential, except for his name. He inquires about the next procedural steps and whether additional documentation is required.

103428Complainant Request for Written Confirmation 1 passage
B. If I do not withdraw
B. If I do not withdraw 6. Please confirm whether, while the complaint remains active, any member of the general public who attends at the Board's offices and requests the file may inspect or obtain copies of unredacted materials containin...

AI summary The text requests confirmation about public access to unredacted materials containing a complainant's civic/mailing address while a complaint is active.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →