Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Compliance Legislation" in M12749

Matter: NSPI DRO Appeal - Billing Issues - Christine Cameron
3 passages 3 documents

Compliance Legislation across all matters →

C-7NSPI response to the Board - redacted 1 passage
Multi-Unit Residential Building (MURB) TOU p. p. 17
Multi-Unit Residential Building (MURB) TOU The Board is satisfied that there are no changes required to this Tariff since NS Power was able to implement manual processes to continue the program for that sector. The Board will issue its Ord...

AI summary The NSEB approves the MURB TOU tariff without changes due to NS Power's manual processes. The Board will approve the 2025/26 TVP Tariffs upon compliance filing. NS Power will update the Board on its Year Four Evaluation Report by December 31, 2025.

C-8Cameron (NSEB) RIR-1 to RIR-4 - Redacted 1 passage
Section 17
rates. • The Board directs that the same amendments be made to these CPP Tariffs as were made to the Domestic CPP Tariff, mutatis mutandis. Multi-Unit Residential Building (MURB) TOU The Board is satisfied that there are no changes require...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) approves tariff amendments for CPP Tariffs, confirms no changes to MURB TOU due to NS Power's manual processes, and awaits compliance filings for 2025/26 TVP Tariffs. NS Power will update the Board by December 31, 2025, on its evaluation report. A cyber incident led to billing customers at standard rates instead of TVP rates until system recovery.

101471Appellant's Submissions in Response to NSPI Reply - Redacted 1 passage
Section 4
Thank you, Christine Cameron Additional details: We have previously asked NS Power to cut trees that have the potential to damage power lines. Our home and transformer are the following distances from the main road, transformer is approx 2...

AI summary Christine Cameron requests NS Power to remove trees near high-tension power lines, citing conflicting responses from the utility. She argues that NS Power's website states their responsibility to remove such trees, but they previously refused, claiming the trees were not close enough. Cameron seeks action to mitigate safety risks.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →