HomeCustomer ServiceM08888Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Customer Service" in M08888

Matter: E-ENS-G-18 - EfficiencyOne - Evaluation of DSM Programs - Application to allow inclusion of Non-Energy BenefitsEfficiencyOne - Application for approval of the use of Non-Energy Benefits within Cost-Effectiveness Testing
4 passages 3 documents

Customer Service across all matters →

E-3E1 (CA) RIR-1 to RIR-6 1 passage
Section 1 p. p. 4
E1 Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary This section outlines responses provided by E1 to information requests made by the Consumer Advocate. It likely includes details related to consumer concerns, service quality, and operational practices.

E-10-(i)Book of Authorities 1 passage
Disagreement between parties to approved agreement p. p. 312
Disagreement between parties to approved agreement - 79P (1) Where Nova Scotia Power Incorporated and a franchise holder are parties to an approved agreement, either or both of them may apply to the Board for directions relating to any dis...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI) and franchise holders may apply to the Board for dispute resolution under approved agreements. The Board must ensure non-applicant parties have adequate notice and time to prepare evidence. Both parties must provide required information, and the Board may issue directions based on customer interests, per 2014 legislation.

E-13-(i)Book of Authorities 2 passages
1. Introduction p. p. 125
utility regulations exist to protect the public from monopolistic behaviour and the consequent inelasticity of demand while ensuring the continued quality of an essential service (see Kahn, at p. 11).

AI summary Utility regulations aim to prevent monopolistic behavior and ensure service quality by addressing demand inelasticity, as noted in a reference to Kahn (p. 11).

B. La décision de la Commission p. p. 125
ies which have appreciated for reasons other than the best interest of the regulated business. For purposes of this appeal, it is important to set out the Board's policy reasons in its own words: 100 To award the entire net gain on the lan...

AI summary The Commission balanced interests between ATCO and customers by allocating one-third of net gains to ATCO and two-thirds to customers, citing risks of inefficiency or speculation if gains were fully awarded to either party. This decision aligns with the 'regulatory pact' principle from prior rulings.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →