Topic:"Demand Side Management Resource Plan" in M06733

This Evidence is in support of approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities (the "Supply Agreement") between EfficiencyOne and NS Power. To the extent possible, EfficiencyOne and NS Power have reach...

AI summary This evidence supports the approval of a Supply Agreement between EfficiencyOne and NS Power for electricity efficiency and conservation activities. The document also discusses the filing of a Demand Side Management Resource Plan (2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan) by EfficiencyOne as the holder of the Efficiency Nova Scotia franchise. The Public Utilities Act requires NS Power to purchase cost-effective energy efficiency activities from the franchise holder.

• Appendix A: 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan 1 • Appendix B: Supply Agreement Outstanding Items 2 • Appendix C: 2013 Evaluation and Verification Recommendations 3 • Appendix D: 2016-2018 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis 4 • Appendix E: Investing...

AI summary This document outlines the history of DSM Plan filings and approvals by ENSC, including the 2012 DSM Plan, 2013-2015 DSM Plan, and the 2014 DCRR application with a Rate Smoothing Adjustment (RSA) mechanism. The UARB approved these filings and related compliance measures.

ency and conservation activities to not more than $35 million, plus any over-recovery of funds by ENSC from 2013 (subsection 79R(1)). The costs NS Power can recover from ratepayers for the 2015 year, beginning in 2016 and over an 8-year pe...

AI summary The text outlines legislative provisions that limit the amount of costs NS Power can recover from ratepayers for energy efficiency and conservation activities to $35 million, adjusted for over-recovery from 2013. It also discusses ENSC's 2015 DSM Resource Plan, the filing of a Settlement Agreement, and subsequent implementation reports and updates provided to the DSM Advisory Group and the UARB.

Figure 3.1 - 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings Year Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) To...

AI summary Figure 3.1 presents the investment and savings data from the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, showing annual investments, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings. The data includes metrics such as the Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC).

Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study at the Base Level, were provided by NS Power. They include the cost of energy and capacity. 2 & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoi...

AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs calculated by ENSC using a DSM Potential Study, including energy and capacity costs. It also references lifetime benefits, TRC and PAC ratios, and ENS's planned participation by low-income customers as outlined in a 2015 settlement agreement.

Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study at the Base Level, were provided by NS Power. They include the cost of energy and capacity. 2 1 & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the av...

AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study, including energy and capacity costs. It also references lifetime benefits, benefit/cost ratios (TRC and PAC), and ENS's planned participation by low-income customers under the 2015 DSM Resource Plan Settlement Agreement.

4.1.2 Balance of Long-Term and Short-Term Considerations The IRP was an important starting point in the development of the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan because it provides a longer-term context within which to view short-term decisions requ...

AI summary The Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) provided a long-term context for the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. However, Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) notes that the Mid-Level DSM Scenario may lead to short-term rate increases due to a mismatch between DSM investment and rate recovery, particularly under an eight-year amortization term and a legislated cap on DSM amortization.

4.3.2 Quarterly Meetings and Reports ENS proposes to continue filing quarterly reports with the UARB for quarters one through three of each year, and meet with the DSM Advisory Group no less than three times per year. The meetings and repo...

AI summary ENS proposes quarterly reporting to UARB and three annual meetings with the DSM Advisory Group to update the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan.

5.2 Rate and Bill As part of the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, ENS is filing a forward-looking Rate and Bill analysis. This is in accordance with requests from Synapse Energy Economics. This is the first time ENS has filed a forward-looking...

AI summary ENS is filing a forward-looking Rate and Bill Impact Analysis as part of the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, the first without historical data. Stakeholder feedback from meetings and submissions was incorporated, with the analysis detailed in Appendix D.

1. INTRODUCTION The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan has been developed based on ENS's growing experience and history in delivering successful DSM programs and services to Nova Scotians. As part of the process, ENS engaged Navigant Consulting a...

AI summary The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) outlines energy efficiency programs, emphasizing flexibility for mid-course adjustments based on market conditions and evaluations. It balances affordability, avoids electrical system capacity additions, and includes residential, business, and enabling strategy programs. The Plan is for planning and cost-effectiveness testing, not direct implementation.

14 1.1 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment 15 16 Figure 1.1.1 provides a summary of the energy savings and investment for the 2016-2018 17 DSM Resource Plan. 18

AI summary The section introduces the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, which outlines energy savings and investment details. It references Figure 1.1.1 for a summary of the plan's energy savings and investment figures.

19 Figure 1.1 - 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings Year Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW)...

AI summary Figure 1.1 outlines the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, showing increasing investments and benefits over the years, along with energy and demand savings, and cost tests.

2.2.1. Low-Income Initiatives Beginning in 2015, NS Power shareholders are committing up to $37 million dollars over 10 years to support the HomeWarming program. The program, in partnership with the Clean Foundation, will offer free energy...

AI summary NS Power is committing up to $37 million over 10 years to support the HomeWarming program, which provides free energy efficiency improvements to low-income homeowners. ENS is also working on initiatives for multi-unit residential buildings and conducting research on low-income rental accommodations with electric heating, as outlined in the 2015 DSM Resource Plan Settlement Agreement.

1. Quantity of Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities (DSM) The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan proposes to supply NS Power with energy savings of 405.9 GWh and peak demand savings of 62.4 MW at an investment of $121.4 million. Sup...

AI summary The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan aims to provide NS Power with 405.9 GWh of energy savings and 62.4 MW of peak demand savings through a $121.4 million investment. The plan is evidence-based, designed to minimize short-term rate impacts while balancing long-term resource savings goals, industry capacity, and diverse program offerings for Nova Scotians.

Update on Implementation of 2013 Verification and Evaluation Recommendations B C E F G K 22 23 Include additional information in monthly reports to DAs: Also in an effort to involve DAs more in 2013, ENSC published and distributed to all D...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation of 2013 verification and evaluation recommendations, focusing on providing additional information in monthly reports to DAs for better resource planning. ENSC agrees to include more data, starting with the December 2014 report.

2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan Rate and Bill Impact Analysis

AI summary This document provides an analysis of the rate and bill impact associated with the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, which outlines energy efficiency initiatives and their financial implications.

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The rate and bill impact analysis completed by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) provides an overall trend-based picture of the rate and bill impacts of DSM at a rate-class level to help inform stakeholders and the UARB of...

AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) conducted a rate and bill impact analysis for its 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, showing rate increases but overall bill savings across all rate classes. While residential rates rose 3.5%, average bills decreased by 4% due to DSM measures, highlighting affordability considerations for stakeholders and the UARB.

Rates versus Bills (Affordability) ENS has taken an in-depth and focused view of affordability in its 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan Application. This analysis provides information on which to analyze the impacts of DSM, providing additional...

AI summary ENS's 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan analysis shows that while short-term rates increase with 100% expensing, long-term rates decrease due to avoided capacity costs. Residential customers see bill reductions despite higher rates, but model discrepancies from removing the Home Energy Report affect savings estimates. ENS plans to address these issues in future models.

6. ENS'S USE OF THE RESULTS - There are several ways in which ENS expects to use the results of this analysis: - ENS expects the analysis to help to inform ongoing discussions with NS Power and stakeholders in regards to the 2016-2018 DSM...

AI summary ENS plans to use analysis results for discussions with NS Power and stakeholders on the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. It will focus recruitment efforts in specific rate classes while maintaining support for high-participation classes. ENS seeks input on integrating rate/bill impact analysis into other studies.

8. CONCLUSION ENS's rate and bill impact analysis provides an overview of general trends in relation to a specific snapshot in time of DSM in Nova Scotia. It captures the rate, bill and participation impact trends of particular DSM scenari...

AI summary ENS's rate and bill impact analysis outlines general trends in DSM impacts for Nova Scotia, providing a trend-based view rather than exact yearly values. This informs discussions for the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan by highlighting overall rate class impacts.

Assumptions used in ENS's 2016-2018 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis Stakeholder Stakeholder Comment ENSC's Response Inclusion in the model Industrial Group We understand that the assumptions that were used for the Rate and Bill Impact Analys...

AI summary The Industrial Group acknowledges that ENSC has updated its assumptions for the 2016-2018 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis, aligning with recommendations from Mr. Woolf at Synapse and the current IRP process of NSPI. ENSC plans to update and re-run the model as part of the DSM Resource Plan Application, using specific IRP scenarios.

This document is intended to provide an overview of the assumptions used in ENS's rate and bill impact analysis. The assumptions were provided to the DSM Advisory Group in advance of the February 27, 2015 filing of ENS's 2016-2018 DSM Reso...

AI summary This document outlines the assumptions used in ENS's rate and bill impact analysis, which were shared with the DSM Advisory Group prior to the February 27, 2015 filing of ENS's 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan during a meeting on February 4, 2015.

These assumptions are for rate and bill impact analysis purposes only and do not impact ENS's calculation of energy savings. Category Item Assumption Overall Assumption Rate class inclusion/ exclusion The Generation Replacement and Load Fo...

AI summary The text outlines assumptions made for rate and bill impact analysis, excluding certain rate classes and using proposed DSM Resource Plan numbers for calculations. These assumptions are for analysis purposes only and do not affect energy savings calculations.

Table 14: Recommendations for Residential Direct Install No. Recommendations RDI-R5. Set limitations for entries and develop a validation process. The Evaluator found that for some products, a mix of "0" and blank entries were used to indi...

AI summary The document recommends standardizing entries in the DSMDS to address inconsistencies in data reporting, such as the use of '0' and blank entries to indicate no product installation. This standardization would help identify missing entries and improve data accuracy.

4.2.1 Business Energy Rebates The 2014 evaluation of Business Energy Rebates demonstrated that most of the recommendations pertaining to process issues made in the previous evaluations have been implemented. The Evaluator commends ENSC on...

AI summary The 2014 evaluation of Business Energy Rebates shows that ENSC has improved the program's process, including tracking systems and collaboration with distributors. However, savings calculations have not improved significantly. Participants were generally satisfied but faced challenges with information availability and process clarity.

ented a number of initiatives for 2014, such as the launch of the Instant Savings application, which shows customers the savings they can achieve through the use of eligible energy-efficient products. Key parameters such as light bulb repl...

AI summary The document discusses ENSC's initiatives in 2014, including the launch of the Instant Savings application and improvements in data collection methods for energy efficiency. It highlights the use of general population surveys over intercept surveys and notes improvements in LED wattage accuracy, though some issues remain with the DSMDS reporting function.

5.1.9 Installation Rates In order to calculate the RDI installation rates, 50 on-site visits were conducted in participating households. The quantity of installed products was recorded and verified against the quantity indicated in the tra...

AI summary To calculate RDI installation rates, 50 on-site visits were conducted in participating households. Recorded product quantities were verified against the tracking system, and installation rates were determined based on acceptable error margins.

5.1.10 Demand-to-Energy Ratio Peak demand savings are calculated using an on-peak demand-to-energy ratio of 0.233 MW/GWh. This ratio was established based on a weighted-average ratio of modelled system-coincident peak demand savings and en...

AI summary The demand-to-energy ratio of 0.233 MW/GWh is used to calculate peak demand savings, based on a weighted average from modelled data in the 2013-2015 DSM Plan. The ratio was determined using local data and technical literature, focusing on peak demand periods in Nova Scotia.

aller projects, a good practice would be to summarize the measurement methodology (what was measured and when) and the equations used to establish energy savings based on the raw data in a short form. 2014 Custom-R2. Improve the informatio...

AI summary The document recommends improving the DSMDS reports by including missing information such as line loss factor, rate code, and verified savings at the meter. It also suggests adding a unique identification code to distinguish between new claims and ongoing M&V adjustments, enhancing clarity and accuracy in evaluation.

3.4 Tracking System In 2014, ENSC tracked Custom Retrofit projects through the DSMDS, and generated tracking reports whenever required for evaluation purposes. Therefore, the DSMDS and the tracking reports replaced the Custom Retrofit trac...

AI summary In 2014, ENSC used the DSMDS to track Custom Retrofit projects and generate tracking reports for evaluation purposes, replacing the Custom Retrofit tracking sheet used previously. The tracking reports provided complete information for evaluation.

Measures by Project The contents of the Measures by Project tab of the tracking report includes the project ID, project name, status, measure categories/codes and description, as well as the verified energy and peak demand savings at the g...

AI summary The Measures by Project tab includes project details and energy savings data. A diversity factor was added based on 2013 recommendations. Some older projects had no reported savings due to initial coding practices, which ENSC aimed to improve.

Measures The Measures tab in the DSMDS shows a table summarizing individual projects' energy savings and implementation costs. The energy savings section provides necessary information required to assess and verify the tracked savings achi...

AI summary The Measures tab in the DSMDS provides detailed information on energy savings, implementation costs, and other factors such as power and diversity factors. ENSC has added these factors based on recommendations from the Evaluator since 2013, showing a commitment to improving data collection and process efficiency.

Documents The Documents tab contains the most detailed information about the 2014 Custom Retrofit projects; it typically includes scoping studies, feasibility studies, the project development agreement (PDA), M&V documentation and other pr...

AI summary The 2014 Custom Retrofit tracking system is considered adequate with signs of improvement, but recommendations include adding Nova Scotia Power rate codes, explaining diversity factors, and identifying M&V adjustments in the DSMDS report to enhance evaluation accuracy and data clarity.

This Appendix presents all recommendations made by the Evaluator throughout the report as well as the sections from which the recommendations originated. Sections Recommendations 2 Improve the information presented in the DSMDS reports. Th...

AI summary The Evaluator recommends improving the DSMDS reports by adding details such as line loss factor, rate code, verified savings at the meter, and free-ridership screening results. It also suggests including both total and current-year savings for better sample selection and adding unique identification codes for ongoing M&V adjustments.

Measures The Measures tab in the DSMDS provides a summary table of the energy savings and implementation costs of an individual project. The energy savings section provides necessary information required to assess and verify the tracked sa...

AI summary The Measures tab in the DSMDS summarizes energy savings and implementation costs for individual projects, including power factor and diversity factor. It also tracks non-electrical benefits and equipment details, showing a commitment to improving data collection for individual measures.

LED T8 Lamps for Replacement of Fluorescent T8 Lamps Most of the 4' T8 linear LED lamps used to replace fluorescent are Philips InstantFit 14.5 W LED T8 lamps. The Evaluator conducted desktop research to determine the actual tube wattage v...

AI summary The document discusses the replacement of fluorescent T8 lamps with LED T8 lamps, focusing on wattage values and compatibility with ballasts. Philips InstantFit lamps are highlighted, with their wattage rounded for DSMDS entry. SubstiTube lamps are also mentioned with a higher wattage and compatibility requirements.

ed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-8 Page 1 of 2 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1  The Direct Installation program makes up a lower percentage of the BNI ene...

AI summary The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan incorporates updated modeling assumptions based on full-year results from 2011-2013 and partial results from 2014, reducing short-term costs to ratepayers. Additionally, the Low Income Homeowner program has been removed from the DSM portfolio due to NS Power’s charitable contribution for low-income electric-heat homeowners.

Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-8 Page 2 of 2 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-9: 2 3 Reference: EfficiencyOne, Evidence - Page 56, Lines 12-...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) responds to NSPI's information request regarding measures with TRC<1.5 in the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. E1 explains that programs are approved at the program level with a minimum TRC of 1.0, and individual measures with TRC<1.0 may be included if the overall program passes. Strategic benefits of including such measures are discussed in Attachment 1.

l) 24,990 is expected that TRC ratios will improve due to greater distribution of fixed costs such as marketing and signage. This product broadens Efficient Products offerings for consumers. As more of these products are purchased by Insta...

AI summary The document includes references to a 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan and responses to information requests by EfficiencyOne related to the plan. It also mentions the inclusion of a new column in a spreadsheet to address specific requests regarding the TRC ratios and fixed costs.

e Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-10 Page 1 of 1 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-11: 2 3 Reference: EfficiencyOne, Appendix A – 2016-2018 DS...

AI summary The document outlines a request for detailed information on how the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan balanced short- and long-term considerations, including bill impacts, rate impacts, and long-term planning analyses, as well as the relative weights used in the balancing process. E1 refers to pages 31-37 of its Application Evidence for this information.

Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-11 Page 7 of 7 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-12: 2 3 Reference: EfficiencyOne, Appendix A – 2016-2018...

AI summary The document outlines a request from E1 (EfficiencyOne) to NSPI (Nova Scotia Power Inc.) regarding the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for the Energy Efficiency Conservation Agreement (EECA) M06733. It asks for detailed information on energy efficiency measures and programs not included in the DSM Resource Plan, analysis of expenditures and energy savings, and considerations of equity between customer classes and participants.

developed its proposed DSM Resource Plan at a lower investment level. 11 12 Ongoing refinement of assumptions and inputs into the EL-RAM (such as achievable 13 potential, market conditions, avoided costs, and historical results) provided v...

AI summary The document discusses the development of a proposed DSM Resource Plan with a lower investment level, focusing on the Home Energy Report as the only component within Energy Savings Actions included in ENS’s original $50 million plan. Refinements in assumptions and inputs into the EL-RAM influenced program-level investment and energy savings analysis.

M and DSM Resource Plans, EfficiencyOne has presented a 28 high-level planning proposal in its Application. The 2016-2018 DSM Resource 29 Plan is not an implementation plan; detailed program budgets have not yet been 30 developed. Date Fil...

AI summary EfficiencyOne has submitted a high-level planning proposal for the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, which is not yet an implementation plan with detailed program budgets. The document also includes references to an Energy Efficiency Conservation Agreement and a conference on energy efficiency.

pse Energy Economics 617-453-7031 [email protected] www.synapse.energy.com Tim Woolf - Energy Efficiency: Rates, Bills and Participation Impacts Slide 26 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI...

AI summary The response to Request IR-13 provides achievable potential and associated investment for the 2016-2018 period, based on ENSC’s DSM Potential Study. The EL-RAM model was used for targets and investments, not achievable potential.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-14: 2 3 (a) Please provide DSM resource plan scenarios (in a format similar to Figures 3.2 to 4 3.4 and the associated ELRAMs) that provide an average measure life greater than 5 10 years for programs that dir...

AI summary The document outlines a request for specific DSM resource plan scenarios and responses from ENS, explaining that such scenarios were not developed during the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan process. ENS argues that developing these scenarios would conflict with long-term energy savings goals and DSM portfolio design principles.

ate Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-16 Page 1 of 2 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 b) If EfficiencyOne is not able to claim ITCs during the implementat...

AI summary EfficiencyOne acknowledges responsibility for HST costs if unable to claim ITCs during the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. They note that energy savings figures would need adjustment in such a case and mention uncertainty regarding guidance from Canada Revenue Agency.

29 e) The 8760 model calculates resource savings profiles by measure type (e.g. Residential 30 Lighting), not by individual measure. Please refer to Attachment 2 for the comparison by Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-17 Page 3 of 4...

AI summary The text discusses the 8760 model's calculation of resource savings by measure type, such as Residential Lighting, and mentions the EL-RAM model refinement discussions with Navigant. It also references the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA and the DSM Potential Study.

15 E1 (NSPI) IR-24 Page 1 of 1 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-25: 2 3 For the 2015 DSM Resource Plan and for the proposed 2016-2018 DSM Resour...

AI summary The response to IR-25 indicates that ENS does not have confirmed contracts with the Province of Nova Scotia for the 2015-2016 and 2016-2018 fiscal years, except for the Low Income Homeowner Service, which is no longer ratepayer-funded. Program investments are based on ratepayer-funded proposals only.

its 2016- 27 2018 DSM Resource Plan development process so did not consider additional mitigation 28 measures. 29 30 c) Please refer to the Application Evidence, pages 32-33. Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-26 Page 1 of 1 2016-2018...

AI summary The document refers to the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan development process, noting that it did not consider additional mitigation measures. It also references the Application Evidence, pages 32-33, and mentions the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter number M06733.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-31: 2 3 Reference: EfficiencyOne – Evidence – Page 41, Lines 28-29: 4 5 E1 states that it has “worked with Navigant to refine the assumptions of the EL-RAM 6 model to put a greater emphasis on lower first-year...

AI summary EfficiencyOne explains modifications to the EL-RAM model to reduce first-year unit costs in the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. Changes included reducing New Home Construction opportunities, removing the Demand Response program, and adjusting Existing Residential program assumptions to prioritize lower-cost measures. These adjustments led to significant cost and energy savings changes.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-33: 2 3 Reference: EfficiencyOne, Appendix F - Balanced Plan Principles (Dunsky Energy 4 Consulting) – Pages 3 and 6: 5 6 Mr. Dunsky states that E1 “devote(s) resources to some higher risk long term efforts.”...

AI summary The response to Request IR-33 explains that EfficiencyOne balances risk minimization and strategic risk-taking in its 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, emphasizing diversification across sectors and investing in enabling strategies to reduce long-term costs.

MeasureLevel Results for Baseline E1 and Optimized Case D Scenarios Pro m T gra ype Sub ͲPro gra m Me asu re Mo del Bui ldin g T ype End Use Cat ego ry Sto ck T tme nt rea Dem and (kW ) Ene rgy (M Wh ) Tot l. Cos al I mp t ($ ) eba 184 Bus...

AI summary The text presents MeasureLevel results for Baseline E1 and Optimized Case D scenarios, including details on demand, energy usage, and total cost impact for various business energy rebate programs. The data highlights differences in demand and cost between the baseline and optimized scenarios for specific measures.

Deltas Comparison of 8760 Resource Savings Profile Between Initial and Final 8760 Models (kW/ Annual kWh Savings) Unnamed: 1 Unnamed: 2 Unnamed: 3 Unnamed: 4 Comparison of 8760 Resource Savings Profile Between Initial and Final 8760 Models...

AI summary The text presents a table comparing the 8760 Resource Savings Profile between initial and final models, showing kW and annual kWh savings across different time intervals. The data includes numerical values and time stamps, illustrating variations in resource savings.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-7: 2 3 (a) What is the rational of cutting "Enabling Strategies" by over 70% compared to E1 4 DSM plan as indicated in Evidence "Appendix B - NSPI Alternate DSM Plan 5 ELECTRONIC.xslx"? 6 7 (b) What are the pe...

AI summary The document discusses a request (IR-7) regarding the rationale for cutting 'Enabling Strategies' by over 70% compared to the E1 DSM plan and the percentage cuts for 'Education and Outreach' vs 'Development and Research' vs 'Other'. NS Power provided a response, noting an error in the summation of the 2016-2018 Enabling Strategies amount and corrected the figures accordingly.

REDACTED 1 2 produce a fuel savings partially off-set by a lost contribution to fixed costs. 3 4 (g) The anticipated energy savings per customer are expected to be approximately 5 6 7 8 9 10 revenue requirement to be minimal. Energy saving...

AI summary The document discusses responses to information requests regarding the 2016-2018 DSM Plan. NSPI explains that Figure 3.1 was based on publicly available data and highlights Nova Scotia's high per capita DSM spending. A discrepancy in Figure 3.4 was identified, and a revised version was provided with supporting analysis.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-11: 2 3 With respect to the No DSM Plan in Figure 4.1 4 5 (a) Please provide the annual forecast of total system energy requirement and system 6 peak load assumed in this plan. 7 8 (b) Please confirm that "No...

AI summary The request (IR-11) asks for details on the 'No DSM' plan, including assumptions about energy requirements, peak load, and whether it includes efficiency improvements from code changes. The response refers to a table for information.

IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT -and- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by EfficiencyOne for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc., th...

AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. for electricity efficiency activities and establishment of a final agreement, along with approval of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan under the Public Utilities Act. The proceeding is before a regulatory board chaired by Peter W. Gurnham, Q.C., with members Kulvinder S. Dhillon and Roberta J. Clarke.

AMENDED ORDER WHEREAS EfficiencyOne ("E 1 ") filed an Application with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board ("Board") on February 27, 2015 for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities betwee...

AI summary EfficiencyOne applied for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. for electricity efficiency and conservation activities. The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board set a hearing date for June 15, 2015, following preliminary discussions and adjustments to the timetable.

M06733 IN THE MATtER OF: THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT And IN THE MATtER OF: An application by EfficiencyOneforApproval of a Supply Agreementfor Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between Efficiencyone ("El") and Nova Scotia Pow...

AI summary This document outlines a consensus agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc. for the approval of a supply agreement and the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan. The agreement was reached following the submission of evidence and responses to information requests by both parties and intervenors.

On the First Business Day of: 2016 20173 20184 Total January $0 $2,900,436 $2,977,167 February $0 $2,641,338 $2,711,215 March $0 $2,833,345 $2,908,301 April $2,596,090 $3,010,077 $3,089,709 May $2,483,522 $2,544,095 $2,611,400 June $2,307,...

AI summary The table shows payments made by NSPI for the years 2016, 2017, and 2018, with a total of over $93 million. A note explains that 2017 payments will be adjusted based on 2015 under-spending by EfficiencyOne and interest earned from the 2014 Balance Adjustment.

1. INTRODUCTION 1 2 3 4 5 The 2016-2018 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan has been developed based on ENS's growing experience and history in delivering successful DSM programs and services to Nova Scotians. As part ofthe process,...

AI summary The 2016-2018 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan was developed by ENS with input from consulting firms. It outlines a comprehensive suite of programs for Nova Scotia electricity users, not intended as an implementation plan but for planning and cost-effectiveness testing. Adjustments will be made based on market conditions, technology, and stakeholder agreements, including those from the Consensus Settlement Agreement and a 2015 Board decision.

4.3.4 Regulatory Affairs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 As approved in the 2015 DSM Resource Plan, Regulatory Affairs initiatives outside of specific research conducted for DSM Resource Plans or Potential Studies are categorized as Enabling Strategies....

AI summary Regulatory Affairs initiatives outside of specific research for DSM Resource Plans are categorized as Enabling Strategies, which include UARB costs, DSM Advisory Group work, stakeholder consultation, and legal work related to regulatory initiatives.

Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board Mailing address PO Box 1692, Unit 'M' Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 [email protected] htto:/lnsuarb.novascotia.ca Office 3rd Floor, 1601 lower water Street Halifax. Nova Scotia B3J 3P6 1 855 442-4448 (...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board approved electronic filing for specific Excel documents in matter M06733 related to Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan. The decision pertains to print exemption requests and allows electronic submission for designated attachments.

of affordability, but rather only to provide a plan based on a spend level that E1 was prepared to support. When asked about the $35 million preliminary scenario by the Board Mr. Crandlemire stated: MR. CLARKE: Mr. Crandlemire, why didn't...

AI summary The discussion centers on the provision of a demand-side management (DSM) plan based on a specific funding level supported by E1. Mr. Crandlemire is questioned about not presenting data to the Board or stakeholders, and a reference is made to the Public Utilities Act and a prior DSM Resource Plan.

& lt;sup>48 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan (M06733), Transcript, June 18, 2015, pages 744-745, lines 21-22 and lines 1-5. 49 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan (M06733), Transcript, June 19, 2015, pages 1024-102...

AI summary The text references transcripts from the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan proceeding (M06733), specifically pages and lines from June 18 and 19, 2015, indicating discussions related to demand-side management planning.

& lt;sup>56 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan (M06733), Transcript, June 16, 2015, page 367, lines 6-16. Exhibit E-45, NS Power Rebuttal Evidence, June 9, 2015, pages 17-18.

AI summary The text references a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan and associated evidence from a regulatory proceeding, including a transcript and rebuttal evidence related to Nova Scotia Power.

& lt;sup>65 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan (M06733), Transcript, June 18, 2015, pages 474-475, lines 16-22 and lines 1-7. 66 Exhibit E-55, NS Power Opening Statement, June 11, 2015, page 1.

AI summary The text references the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan and an exhibit from NS Power's opening statement, indicating the inclusion of DSM-related materials in the regulatory proceeding.

2 3 Nova Scotia's success in reducing electricity consumption and lowering costs for Nova Scotians 4 is the result of the input and knowledge of a broad spectrum of stakeholders. Without this, Nova 5 Scotians would pay more on their power...

AI summary Nova Scotia's success in reducing electricity consumption and costs is attributed to stakeholder collaboration. EfficiencyOne has reached an agreement with major stakeholders, including the Consumer Advocate and the Small Business Advocate, on an efficiency plan for 2016-2018. The plan does not impact rates and avoids using efficiency funds for other purposes, ensuring affordability.

I mean in the Province's energy report that one of the things that customers wanted was they preferred – they wanted stability in their rates, so we were looking at the stable level of investment. And the third thing would be that balance...

AI summary The discussion highlights the importance of balancing rate stability and affordability, noting that bills depend on both rates and consumption. Affordability concerns are emphasized for both short-term and long-term periods. The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan is referenced as having considered short-, medium-, and long-term impacts, with a focus on minimizing utility revenue requirements over 25 years.

CONCLUSION 2 1 - 3 EfficiencyOne respectfully requests an Order from the Board approving: - 4 (1) The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan 88 , as modified by the terms of the Quantum - 5 Agreement and the Consensus Agreement as applicable; and - 6...

AI summary EfficiencyOne requests the Board to approve the modified 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan and related agreements, including the Supply Agreement and its schedules.

Cumulative Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator Cumulative Annual Net Peak Demand Savings at Generator (GWh) (MW) Scope of Service - Deliverables (2016-2018 Term) 405.9 62.5 The planning details to achieve the above deliverables are as s...

AI summary The document outlines the cumulative annual net energy and peak demand savings targets for the 2016-2018 term, as set out in EfficiencyOne's DSM Resource Plan, filed in February 2015 and subject to UARB approval.

ethodology used to create Scenario C and intent of Scenario C was reviewed in detail in the proceeding (both written and oral portions) and, NS Power submits, such characterization by the CA is not an & lt;sup>7 Exhibit E-33, NS Power Revi...

AI summary NS Power's methodology for creating Scenario C and its intent were reviewed in detail during the proceeding. The characterization of Scenario C by the Commissioner of the Inquiry is challenged by NS Power.

3 Mr. Dunsky also confirmed on crossexamination that despite including many high cost states (Massachusetts, & lt;sup>20 E1 Closing Submission, July 8, 2015, page 22, lines 7-8. & lt;sup>21 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan (M...

AI summary The text references a cross-examination involving Mr. Dunsky and mentions a Demand Side Management Resource Plan from 2016-2018, citing a matter number (M06733) and a transcript from June 15, 2015.

M06733 IN THE MATtER OF: THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT And IN THE MATtER OF: An application by EfficiencyOneforApproval of a Supply Agreementfor Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between Efficiencyone ("El") and Nova Scotia Pow...

AI summary This document outlines a consensus agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc. regarding the approval of a supply agreement and the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. The agreement was reached after evidence was filed and information requests were addressed by the Co-Applicants and intervenors.

- On February 27, 2015, EfficiencyOne filed its Application for approval of an Electricity - Efficiency Supply Agreement with NSPI, which included, inter alia , its 2016-2018 DSM - Resource Plan for approval by the Nova Scotia Utility and...

AI summary EfficiencyOne submitted an application to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board in 2015 for approval of an Electricity Efficiency Supply Agreement with NSPI, including its 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, under the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act.

- below. The revised 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan is attached as Schedule E of the Supply - Agreement. The DSM investments have been revised to comply with the annual portfolio - investment levels approved by the Board. Portfolio energy and...

AI summary The revised 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, attached as Schedule E of the Supply Agreement, has been updated to align with the Board's annual portfolio investment levels. Energy and demand savings targets remain unchanged, but the distribution of savings and investment across programs has been adjusted to better meet the requirements of the Decision.

1 Figure 0. 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings Year Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Tot...

AI summary The table presents investment and savings data for the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, showing annual investments, lifetime benefits, energy and demand savings, and cost tests. Total investments amount to $102.15 million with cumulative lifetime benefits of $413.5 million.

EECA Plan (2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan)

AI summary The document references the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Agreement (EECA) Plan for the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. It includes a visual element, likely related to the plan's details or data.

1. INTRODUCTION The 2016-2018 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan has been developed based on ENS's growing experience and history in delivering successful DSM programs and services to Nova Scotians. As part of the process, ENS enga...

AI summary The 2016-2018 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan outlines ENS's comprehensive suite of programs and services for Nova Scotia electricity users. It emphasizes flexibility for mid-course adjustments based on market conditions and stakeholder agreements, while addressing affordability and long-term planning considerations.

- 2 2017, and 2018, respectively. 4 Figure 1.2 - 2016 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2016 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Deman...

AI summary This table presents the 2016 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, detailing program investments, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings across residential and non-residential programs, including efficient product rebates, custom incentives, and enabling strategies.

NS Power. They include the cost of energy and capacity. a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio co...

AI summary The text discusses the inclusion of energy and capacity costs in NS Power's analysis, along with metrics like TRC and PAC, which compare lifetime benefits to costs. It also references ENS's planned participation by low-income customers based on the 2015 DSM Resource Settlement Agreement.

On the First Business Day of: 2016 20173 20184 Total January $0 $2,900,436 $2,977,167 February $0 $2,641,338 $2,711,215 March $0 $2,833,345 $2,908,301 April $2,596,090 $3,010,077 $3,089,709 May $2,483,522 $2,544,095 $2,611,400 June $2,307,...

AI summary The table shows payments made by NSPI in 2016, 2017, and 2018, with adjustments for under-spending and interest earned. The 2017 payments are reduced based on 2015 under-spending and 2014 interest, while the 2018 payments are reduced based on 2016 interest.

Schedule E EECA Plan (2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan)

AI summary Schedule E presents the EECA Plan (2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan), outlining demand-side management initiatives under Nova Scotia's regulatory proceeding. The plan focuses on electricity efficiency and conservation programs managed by EECA.

1. INTRODUCTION The 2016-2018 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan has been developed based on ENS's growing experience and history in delivering successful DSM programs and services to Nova Scotians. As part of the process, ENS enga...

AI summary The 2016-2018 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan outlines ENS's comprehensive suite of programs and services for Nova Scotia electricity users, developed with input from consulting firms. The Plan is not an implementation plan but a tool for planning and cost-effectiveness testing, with flexibility for mid-course adjustments based on market changes and stakeholder agreements.

5 NS Power. They include the cost of energy and capacity. a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio...

AI summary The text discusses the cost components of energy and capacity, as well as the calculation of lifetime benefits and benefit/cost ratios (TRC and PAC) for program measures. It references ENS's planned participation by low-income customers under the 2015 DSM Resource Settlement Agreement.

Schedule E EECA Plan (2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan) This page has been intentionally left blank

AI summary Schedule E references the EECA's 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. The page is intentionally left blank, indicating no further details or content provided in this section of the regulatory proceeding document.

1. INTRODUCTION 1 2 3 4 5 The 2016-2018 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan has been developed based on ENS's growing experience and history in delivering successful DSM programs and services to Nova Scotians. As part ofthe process,...

AI summary The 2016-2018 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan was developed by ENS with input from consulting firms. It outlines a range of programs and services for Nova Scotia electricity users, emphasizing flexibility for mid-course adjustments based on stakeholder agreements and regulatory decisions. The plan balances affordability and long-term planning while avoiding unnecessary system capacity additions.

4.3.4 Regulatory Affairs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 As approved in the 2015 DSM Resource Plan, Regulatory Affairs initiatives outside of specific research conducted for DSM Resource Plans or Potential Studies are categorized as Enabling Strategies....

AI summary Regulatory Affairs initiatives, categorized as Enabling Strategies, are essential for future energy savings. These include UARB costs, DSM Advisory Group activities, stakeholder consultation, and legal work related to regulatory initiatives, as approved in the 2015 DSM Resource Plan.