Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Demand Side Management" in M03666

Matter: P-188 - NSPI Regulation 3.6 - Net Metering - Request approval of the revised Regulation 3.6Enhanced net metering service, in compliance with recent legislative changes to the Electricity Act.
17 passages 7 documents

Demand Side Management across all matters →

N-1Letter, Application and Evidence filed by NSPI 11/1/2010 3 passages
Preamble p. p. 0
2 3 Under existing Regulation 3.6, excess generation over a customer's own-4 consumption is banked as energy credits each billing period and is applied against 5 future bills for a period not to exceed 12 months. After 12 months, any unuse...

AI summary The text discusses changes to the regulation of energy credits under the Electricity Act , proposing that customers receive cash payments for surplus self-generation after 12 months, rather than losing the credits. It also notes that the Demand Side Cost Recovery Rider (DCRR) will not be applied to surplus generation compensation.

3.6.6 Special Conditions p. p. 16
3.6.6 Special Conditions - a) Special conditions in this regulation do not supersede, modify or nullify special conditions accompanying the otherwise-applicable metered tariff schedules. - b) Qualifying generating equipment must meet the f...

AI summary This section outlines special conditions for qualifying generating equipment, including requirements for renewable energy sources, maximum capacity, ownership, and location. It also details customer-generator responsibilities and approval processes by NSPI.

4 Stakeholder Minas Basin Pulp & Power p. p. 50
s electricity generated during a fiscal period may encourage the installation of larger and more efficient generators. NSPI Response N/A 11 Stakeholder Nova Scotia Federation of Agriculture Suggestions/Comments The ability to aggregate met...

AI summary Stakeholders, including the Nova Scotia Federation of Agriculture, comment on net metering and generator sizing. They suggest allowing larger generators to support energy efficiency and account for future consumption increases. NSPI responds that net metering aims to offset consumption and will assess applications to ensure generators are appropriately sized.

N-2NSPI IR Responses HRWC 1/26/2011 1 passage
\ \ The general service area is a summary and does not describe all areas served.
\ \ The general service area is a summary and does not describe all areas served. 1 Request IR-2: 2 3 Reference: Evidence page 4, lines 13 and 14. 4 5 6 7 NSPI's proposed program establishes a maximum capacity of 20MW, apportioned between...

AI summary The document discusses NSPI's proposed net metering program with a 20MW capacity cap, explaining that it is a replacement for the current 0.5 percent of historical peak demand cap. The purpose is to trigger a review of cost implications when service uptake approaches the limit.

N-3NSPI IR Responses Multeese 1/26/2011 1 passage
NON-CONFIDENTIAL
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-3: Total Energy Charge, block 1 (first 200kWh demand) ¢/kWh 9.895 Block 2 Energy Base cost of fuel ¢/kWh 4.943 Non-fuel ¢/kWh 1.881 AA ¢/kWh 0.133 BA ¢/kWh 0.116 Total Energy Charge, block 2 ¢/kWh 7.073 Energy...

AI summary The text presents a detailed breakdown of energy charges and rates for different customer classes, including residential, large general, and industrial rates. It outlines various components such as base fuel costs, non-fuel costs, affordability programs (AA and BA), and energy efficiency programs, including the Demand Cost Recovery Rate (DCRR). Transformer ownership credits and energy efficiency program charges are also listed.

N-6NSPI Reply Submission 2/23/2011 7 passages
Section 19 p. p. 14
as already been considered and determined by the UARB. In 34 that proceeding, Board Counsel consultant, Mr. Whalen, agreed that 35 potential emissions credits should be held by NSPI: 10 HRWC IR-5(b). 1 2 [118] Mr. Whalen recommended that t...

AI summary The UARB determined that environmental credits from DSM projects should remain with the DSM Administrator for the benefit of all customers, ensuring that NSPI customers do not pay twice for the same benefit. This decision aligns with the 2007 IRP and the Amended Electricity Act.

Transforming our current electricity mix to one that is more local and green is important to our future energy security. p. p. 21
Transforming our current electricity mix to one that is more local and green is important to our future energy security. The Government of Nova Scotia has set ambitious targets for generating more electricity from renewable sources, as wel...

AI summary Nova Scotia aims to increase renewable energy use to 25% by 2015 and 40% by 2020, supported by the Environmental Goals and Sustainable Prosperity Act. Conservation and energy efficiency are emphasized as critical to achieving these targets, with Efficiency Nova Scotia managing demand-side management programs. The province has significant renewable resources, including wind, tidal, and biomass.

Smart Technologies p. p. 38
Smart Technologies A smart grid delivers electricity using digital technology to manage a customer's energy use. For example, a smart grid could turn on domestic hot water heaters only at night, when demand is slack and the cost of produci...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation of smart grid technologies in Nova Scotia, including the use of digital systems to manage customer energy use and the integration of smart grids with renewable resources. NSPI will use a federal grant to test these technologies and study their impact on customer behavior and load management.

Costs and Benefits p. pp. 40-41
Costs and Benefits he transition from imported fuels to renewable electricity and cleaner local fuels will increase power bills in the short term, but offer lower and more stable rates in the long run. Not making this transition would shac...

AI summary The transition to renewable energy and cleaner fuels will increase power bills in the short term but offer more stable and lower rates long-term. Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) highlights that the share of fuel costs in its overall expenses is rising, as is the cost of controlling emissions from coal-fired plants. Government estimates suggest a 1-2% annual increase in electricity bills due to this plan, with potential offsets from energy efficiency and demand-side management programs.

When can I get started? p. p. 46
When can I get started? NSPI is required to file the details of the enhanced program with the UARB by November 1, 2010. To keep up to date with program developments, you should subscribe to the Department of Energy's newsletters. Please vi...

AI summary NSPI must file details of an enhanced program with the UARB by November 1, 2010. Subscribers can stay informed by signing up for the Department of Energy's newsletters and visiting www.nsrenewables.ca for updates.

Who qualifies to participate? p. p. 46
Who qualifies to participate? Projects qualifying for the COMFIT must be owned by one or a combination of the following entities: Municipality or wholly-owned subsidiary of that municipality: The project must be located within the boundari...

AI summary The COMFIT program is available to projects owned by municipalities, Mi'kmaq band councils, co-operatives, or not-for-profit organizations that meet specific residency and location criteria.

4. SUBMIT YOUR COMPLETED APPLICATION TO DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/ONE-WINDOW COMMITTEE p. p. 46
4. SUBMIT YOUR COMPLETED APPLICATION TO DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/ONE-WINDOW COMMITTEE The COMFIT program is expected to commence in the spring 2011. Once the COMFIT rates are established and the website is ready to accept applications, applica...

AI summary The COMFIT program is set to start in spring 2011. Applications can be submitted electronically once rates are established and the website is ready, with updates available through the program's website and newsletters.

06618Board Decision 3/21/2011 1 passage
2. Capacity Limits
2. Capacity Limits [23] HRWC's position regarding the net metering capacity limit is as follows: ... a cap of 20MW (about 1% of maximum NSPI system demand) appears overly restrictive, and there has been no evidence provided by NSPI to sugg...

AI summary HRWC argues that the 20 MW net metering capacity limit imposed by NSPI is overly restrictive and lacks sufficient evidence. NSPI defends the cap as an increase from the current 12 MW limit and suggests it will allow monitoring of cost recovery implications. Both parties agree on the need for future review once the limit is reached.

06112Information Requests (IR-1 to IR-4) issued by Board Counsel Consultant, Multeese Consuling Inc. to NSPI 1/12/2011 1 passage
NON-CONFIDENTIAL
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 2 IR-l Request 4 At line 15, page NSPI states that it will work with customers to help ensure their 6, 5 ofthe generator is sized to meet the expected annual consumption customer. 6 Assuming the customer is proposing ins...

AI summary The document contains several requests related to NSPI's application to amend Regulation 3.6 on net metering. These requests include clarifications on generator sizing, definitions of distribution zones, and details on energy and demand charges for different rate classes.

06618Board Decision 3/21/2011 3 passages
III NSPI PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
III NSPI PROPOSED AMENDMENTS [12] In its Application, NSPI proposed the following amendments to Regulation 3.6: - a) Increase the existing limit for customer generating capacity from 100 kW to 1 MW. - b) Increase the existing net metering...

AI summary NSPI proposed amendments to Regulation 3.6, including increasing customer generating capacity limits, revising net metering program capacities, establishing two classes of service, expanding meter aggregation, and modifying surplus generation compensation. The amendments aim to align with interconnection standards and facilitate administrative processes. NSPI also confirmed alignment with the Electricity Act and engaged stakeholders in the process.

2. Capacity Limits
2. Capacity Limits [23] HRWC's position regarding the net metering capacity limit is as follows: ... a cap of 20MW (about 1% of maximum NSPI system demand) appears overly restrictive, and there has been no evidence provided by NSPI to sugg...

AI summary HRWC argues that the 20 MW net metering capacity limit imposed by NSPI is overly restrictive and lacks sufficient evidence. NSPI defends the cap, citing its increase from 12 MW and the need to monitor cost recovery implications. NSPI also plans to revisit the cap in the future and agrees with a recommendation to adjust the Class 2 limit to 101 kW.

[30] In its response, NSPI stated:
[30] In its response, NSPI stated: ... HRWC's submission suggests that if there is no enactment currently which enables NSPI to use credits or allowances to comply with emissions regulation, that a customer is entitled to keep such credits...

AI summary NSPI argues that customers must transfer emissions credits to NSPI as a condition of participation, and that these credits must be used solely for compliance with emissions regulations. NSPI references a previous Board decision in a DSM proceeding, which stated that environmental credits from DSM projects should remain with the DSM Administrator for all customers' benefit.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →