Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Demand Side Management" in M12623

Matter: Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC) - Fourth Quarter 2025 for Approval of Revised Regional Reliability Criteria
12 passages 1 document

Demand Side Management across all matters →

N-1Application - Directory 5 filing 12 passages
Resource -Specific Requirements p. pp. 14-60
Resource -Specific Requirements - R7. A Balancing Authority shall not count synchronized reserve , tenminute reserve , or thirty-minute reserve from loads that are already counted in other demand response programs and would result in doubl...

AI summary The document outlines specific resource requirements for balancing authorities, prohibiting double counting of reserves from loads already participating in demand response programs and setting criteria for eligible resources to provide synchronized, ten-minute, and thirty-minute reserves.

1.0 ADI General Requirements p. p. 42
1.0 ADI General Requirements In order to participate in ADI, Balancing Authorities shall establish the appropriate data exchange and apply the ADI term to their respective ACE in AGC. Transmission limits or other internal constraints that...

AI summary The document outlines general requirements for ADI (Automated Demand Response Integration), including data exchange protocols, handling of transmission limits, and the use of standardized signs for ACE (Area Control Error). It also addresses inadvertent interchange and how ADI allocations may be used to correct imbalances among participants.

2.0 ADI Methodology p. p. 42
2.0 ADI Methodology Changes to the ADI states (enable/disable) and parameters are coordinated through the ADI Coordinator. The ADI Coordinator has the authority to globally disable ADI. Following this action, all participants shall be noti...

AI summary The ADI Methodology outlines the coordination and control mechanisms for Automated Demand Response Integration (ADI), including the authority of the ADI Coordinator to enable or disable ADI, communication protocols, and reliability monitoring by the NPCC Control Performance Working Group (CO-1).

3.0 Action to Mitigate Ten-Minute Reserve Shortages p. p. 47
3.0 Action to Mitigate Ten-Minute Reserve Shortages 3.1 Actions When Becoming Deficient in Ten-Minute Reserve To minimize the magnitude and duration of a Ten-Minute Reserve deficiency, a Balancing Authority may implement any or all of the...

AI summary This section outlines actions a Balancing Authority can take to address deficiencies in ten-minute reserve and synchronized reserve. Measures include committing offline resources, recalling exports, obtaining external resources, and managing interruptible loads to ensure reliability and compliance with reserve requirements.

The Coordinator role for all programs must also be approved by the TFCO. p. p. 51
The Coordinator role for all programs must also be approved by the TFCO. Participation Request Form Balancing Authority Name: The Balancing Authority named above requests participation in the following programs (check one or more): Simulta...

AI summary The document outlines the requirement for the Coordinator role in various programs to be approved by the TFCO. It includes a form for participation in programs such as Simultaneous Activation of Reserve and ACE Diversity Interchange.

ACE Diversity Interchange p. p. 60
ACE Diversity Interchange R23. Balancing Authorities participating in the "ACE Diversity Interchange", (ADI) program shall conform to the procedures, as specified in Attachment C.

AI summary Balancing Authorities participating in the ACE Diversity Interchange program must follow the procedures outlined in Attachment C.

Section 152 p. p. 76
First Pass – NYISO is provided 600 MW of assistance. These shares are allocated equally, 200 MW each, among the other three participants – including PJM. Second Pass – PJM is provided 200 MW of assistance. These shares are allocated equall...

AI summary The text discusses the allocation of generation assistance among Balancing Authorities, including NYISO and PJM, and the restoration of ACE (Area Control Error) after a contingency. It also references the SAR (Simultaneous Activation of Ten-Minute Reserve) procedure and the impact on generation levels.

IESO NE NE PJM PJM NY NY Tot Tot p. p. 76
IESO NE NE PJM PJM NY NY Tot Tot Time Sch IESO Sch ACE Sch ACE Sch ACE Sch ACE Pre-contingency 0 0 +400 0 -200 0 -200 0 0 0 Contingency 0 0 +400 -1600 -200 0 -200 0 0 -1600 PJM/NY/NE schedule change 0 0 0 -1200 0 -200 0 -200 0 -1600 No res...

AI summary The document provides a table and example illustrating the distribution of energy purchases and assistance during a contingency event, involving ISO-NE, PJM, and NYISO purchasing 700 MW each from Quebec on Sandy Pond. It outlines the initial shares, assistance sought, and total generation picked up after SAR is canceled.

Section 162 p. p. 76
First Pass – ISO-NE is provided 350 MW of assistance. These shares are allocated equally, 117 MW each, among the other three participants. Second Pass – NYISO is provided 350 MW of assistance. These shares are allocated equally, 117 MW eac...

AI summary The text discusses the distribution of 350 MW of assistance among three participants in different balancing authority scenarios, including ISO-NE, NYISO, and PJM. It also references the restoration of composite NPCC/PJM ACE and the cancellation of the SAR procedure, showing the additional generation after these actions.

IESO IESO NE NE PJM PJM NY NY Tot Tot p. p. 76
IESO IESO NE NE PJM PJM NY NY Tot Tot Time Sch ACE Sch ACE Sch ACE Sch ACE Sch ACE Pre-contingency 0 0 +1400 0 -700 0 -700 0 0 0 Contingency 0 0 +1400 -2100 -700 0 -700 0 0 -2100 PJM/NY/NE Schedule change 0 0 0 -700 0 -700 0 -700 0 -2100 N...

AI summary The table presents data related to scheduling changes, area control error (ACE), and simultaneous activation of ten-minute reserve (SAR) entries across different regions including IESO, NE, PJM, and NY. It outlines pre-contingency and contingency scenarios, schedule changes, and SAR responses.

Section 166 p. p. 76
First Pass – The NYISO is provided 600 MW of assistance. These shares are allocated equally, 200 MW each, among the other three participants – including PJM. Second Pass – PJM is provided -200 MW of assistance. These shares are allocated e...

AI summary The text discusses the allocation of assistance among Balancing Authorities, including the NYISO and PJM, and how negative shares reduce the net pick-ups required. It also references the restoration of the composite NPCC/PJM ACE and the cancellation of the SAR procedure, with an example involving ISO-NE purchasing power from multiple entities.

Section 170 p. p. 76
First Pass – NYISO is provided 500 MW of assistance. NBP-SO is limited to 50 MW and is assigned a share of 50 MW. The remaining 450 MW of shares are allocated equally, 150 MW each, among the other three participants – including ISO-NE. Sec...

AI summary The document outlines the allocation of assistance during a contingency, detailing how NYISO, NBP-SO, and ISO-NE received shares of 500 MW and 150 MW in two passes. It also describes the total generation picked up by Balancing Authorities and the restoration of the NPCC/PJM ACE after the SAR procedure is canceled.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →