Topic:"Demand Side Management" in M12696

NSPML Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests 1 month that resulted in excessive icing). Additional details to support the request for relief 25 November 2012 "Electricity Demand Forecast" Report, energy demand in 2023 26 was f...

AI summary NSPML provided responses to consumer advocate information requests, including a comparison between forecasted and actual electricity demand in 2023, showing significant differences in both energy demand and peak demand figures.

NSPML Responses to Industrial Group Information Requests 1 Request IR-05: 20 timing and in duration based on both the requirements of the interconnected systems, 21 as well as the required maintenance work for the given planning/execution...

AI summary NSPML provided responses to an industrial group's information request, detailing energy delivery timelines, Make-up Energy amounts, and the impact of the LIL commissioning on energy delivery. The response includes specific figures, such as 6,333 MWh of Make-up Energy delivered in September 2023 and the role of the LIL in ensuring timely energy delivery.

NSPML Responses to Small Business Advocate Information Requests 1 Request IR-01: 10 This reporting obligation may change depending on the outcome of the current 11 Application and subject to the Boards determination. As expected, managemen...

AI summary NSPML responds to information requests regarding deferred energy delivery and unplanned outages, referencing the Application and FAM Audit. It discusses the redelivery of deferred energy, the replacement cost, and the definition of 'reasonable time' for delivery following outages.

- NS Block, measured in MWh (excluding Make-up Energy), is received during each of 12 - consecutive months."[41](#page-18-1) In introducing this requirement, the Board also stated: - NSPML/NS Power may apply to the Board for relief if it c...

AI summary The requirement mandates NSPML to receive twelve consecutive months of NS Block volumes (excluding Make-up Energy) at least 90% of the total monthly volumes called for under the Energy and Capacity Agreement. This prevents over-reliance on Make-up volumes and ensures consistency and predictability in volume delivery.

11 - 13 Q. For the four months in which deliveries were below threshold, did NSPML claim - 14 that the deficiencies were explained by "good utility practice" and/or "exceptional - 15 circumstances?" 48 NSPML Application, page 10 lines 12 t...

AI summary NSPML claims that deficiencies in NS Block volumes during four months were due to 'good utility practice' and 'exceptional circumstances,' specifically citing a planned LIL outage in July 2023 and other factors related to the LIL's performance, not Muskrat Falls or the Maritime Link.

hern Alliance for Clean Energy. Adequacy of consideration of energy efficiency in Georgia Power's 2010 integrated resource plan, including cost effectiveness, rate and bill impacts, and lost revenues. Georgia PSC Docket No. 31082, direct t...

AI summary Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (SACE) provided testimony in multiple regulatory proceedings from 2010–2013, challenging the adequacy of energy efficiency considerations in Georgia Power and South Carolina Electric & Gas's integrated resource plans (IRPs) and demand-side management (DSM) plans. Focus areas included cost-effectiveness, stakeholder engagement, resource mix analysis, and program revisions.