The TRC benefit cost ratio also improves from 2.0 to 2.2. The impact of permitting reasonable variations in program costs and incentives (Scenario B) is to permit slightly lower energy savings and program costs relative to Scenario A. The...
AI summary The TRC benefit cost ratio improves from 2.0 to 2.2. Scenario B allows for slightly lower energy savings and program costs compared to Scenario A. Scenario C provides 279 GWh and 33.0 MW of savings at a cost of $65.4 million. The analysis relies on ELRAM's participation forecasting algorithms to predict customer response to different program offerings and incentive levels.