Topic:"Energy Efficiency Budgets" in M06733

3.2 Energy Savings and Investment 9 Figure 3.1 provides a summary of the energy and demand savings and investment for the 2016-2018 DSM Plan. 1213 11

AI summary The section discusses energy savings and investment under the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, referencing a summary provided in Figure 3.1. It outlines the context and scope of energy savings initiatives during this period.

Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study at the Base Level, were provided by NS Power. They include the cost of energy and capacity. Figures 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 provide the program-level savings and investment for 20...

AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs calculated by ENSC's DSM Potential Study, including energy and capacity costs. It references program-level savings and investment figures from 2016 to 2018 and explains terms like TRC and PAC, which are benefit/cost ratios used to evaluate the efficiency of demand-side management programs.

Figure 3.2 - 2016 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2016 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total R...

AI summary Figure 3.2 presents the 2016 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, detailing program investments, benefits, and energy and demand savings across residential, business, nonprofit, and institutional sectors, along with associated cost tests.

Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study at the Base Level, were provided by NS Power. They include the cost of energy and capacity. 2 & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoi...

AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs calculated by ENSC using a DSM Potential Study, including energy and capacity costs. It also references lifetime benefits, TRC and PAC ratios, and ENS's planned participation by low-income customers as outlined in a 2015 settlement agreement.

Figure 3.3- 2017 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2017 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Re...

AI summary The 2017 DSM Resource Plan outlines investments and savings across various demand-side management programs in Nova Scotia, including residential and business initiatives, with figures detailing investment amounts, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings.

Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study at the Base Level, were provided by NS Power. They include the cost of energy and capacity. 2 1 & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the av...

AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study, including energy and capacity costs. It also references lifetime benefits, benefit/cost ratios (TRC and PAC), and ENS's planned participation by low-income customers under the 2015 DSM Resource Plan Settlement Agreement.

Figure 3.4 - 2018 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2018 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total R...

AI summary Figure 3.4 presents the 2018 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, detailing program investments, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings across residential, business, nonprofit, and institutional programs, along with enabling strategies.

Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study at the Base Level, were provided by NS Power. They include the cost of energy and capacity. 2 1 & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the av...

AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study, including energy and capacity costs. It also references lifetime benefits, TRC and PAC ratios, and ENS's planned participation by low-income customers as outlined in the 2015 DSM Resource Plan Settlement Agreement.

rm rate impacts, particularly with a legislated $100 million cap on amortization of DSM. ENS agrees the impacts would be inappropriate when considering the additional analysis undertaken by NS Power. While short-term rate impacts are impor...

AI summary The document discusses the importance of balancing short-term and long-term considerations in the development of a Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, emphasizing the negative impacts of pausing or reducing DSM investments. It highlights the long-term benefits of maintaining consistent DSM investment levels to avoid increased fuel costs and start-up expenses.

Draft , February 18, 2015, page 12. 14 Province of Nova Scotia, 2015 Electricity Review Report Draft , February 18, 2015, page 37. • The Plan provides for long-term affordability as it avoids the adverse consequences of investing in new ca...

AI summary The document emphasizes the importance of demand-side management (DSM) in ensuring long-term affordability of electricity by reducing revenue requirements and customer costs. It highlights that investing in DSM yields significant financial benefits, with each dollar invested yielding between $1.24 and $4.00 in benefits. Failure to invest in DSM results in higher costs for customers.

lting in lower unit costs than found in prior approved DSM Plans. Navigant, 2015 Investing in Demand-side Resources: Considering Affordability, February 26, 2015, page 4 ENS has addressed short-term affordability considerations in multiple...

AI summary The document discusses ENS's approach to affordability in its DSM Plan, noting that the proposed Plan requires less investment than initially modeled, resulting in lower unit costs and addressing short-term affordability concerns. It also references the 2014 IRP and the impact of DSM-related rate increases on the Fuel Adjustment Mechanism.

The figure below provides ENS's proposed minimum Performance Thresholds associated with approved Performance Targets: Figure 4.3 - Minimum Performance Thresholds Approved 2016-2018 Performance Target (Metrics) Units Approved 2016-2018 Perf...

AI summary The document outlines ENS's proposed minimum performance thresholds for energy and peak demand savings under approved performance targets from 2016 to 2018. It also references considerations and items related to legislation.

2 As described above, ENS will be pleased to provide input into NS Power's proposed cost 3 allocation methodology once available. Mitigation Strategy Potential Impact and/or Uncertainty Restricting participation for specific rate classes t...

AI summary The document discusses potential mitigation strategies and their impacts on ENSC's ability to meet 2014 targets, customer satisfaction, and free-ridership. Strategies include restricting participation for specific rate classes, reducing incentives, and changing eligible measures, which may lead to confusion and dissatisfaction.

19 Figure 1.1 - 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings Year Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW)...

AI summary Figure 1.1 outlines the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, showing increasing investments and benefits over the years, along with energy and demand savings, and cost tests.

Currency is expressed in 2016 dollars. Columns may not add correctly, due to rounding. Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study at the Base Level, were provided by NS Power. They include the cost of energy and capa...

AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study, including energy and capacity costs. It also introduces TRC and PAC as benefit/cost ratios comparing lifetime benefits to program costs. Figures 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4 provide investment and savings data for 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively.

Figure 1.2 - 2016 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2016 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total R...

AI summary Figure 1.2 presents the 2016 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings, detailing the investment amounts, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings for various residential and business programs. It includes data on program administrator costs and total resource costs.

& lt;sup>d Reflects ENS's planned participation by low income customers, per the 2015 DSM Resource Settlement Agreement. Figure 1.3 - 2017 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2017 Investment (S Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremen...

AI summary The 2017 DSM Resource Plan outlines investments and savings for residential and non-residential programs, including efficient product rebates, custom incentives, and education initiatives, with a focus on low-income participation and overall energy savings metrics.

Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study at the Base Level, were provided by NS Power. They include the cost of energy and capacity. DATE FILED: February 27, 2015 & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the n...

AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs calculated by NS Power using ENSC's DSM Potential Study, including energy and capacity costs. It also references lifetime benefits, TRC, PAC, and ENS's planned participation by low-income customers as outlined in the 2015 DSM Resource Settlement Agreement.

Figure 1.4 - 2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment 2018 Investment (S million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total R...

AI summary Figure 1.4 presents the 2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment, detailing the investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy and demand savings, and cost tests for various residential and non-residential DSM programs in Nova Scotia.

Update on Implementation of 2013 Verification and Evaluation Recommendations B C E F G K 3 4 Efficiency Nova Scotia should take steps to carefully establish a Nova Scotia TRM. This would facilitate both program planning and evaluation. Sav...

AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENSC) is working to establish a Nova Scotia Total Resource Cost (TRM) model to facilitate program planning and evaluation. A draft TRM was completed in Q4 2014 and is being operationalized into business practices, with completion expected in 2015 following the incorporation of 2014 evaluation results.

Assumptions used in ENS's 2016-2018 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis Stakeholder Stakeholder Comment ENSC's Response Inclusion in the model Stakeholder Stakeholder Comment ENSC's Response Inclusion in the model

AI summary The document outlines assumptions used in ENS's 2016-2018 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis, including stakeholder comments, ENSC's responses, and whether the model includes these assumptions. The focus is on the discussion of rate and bill impact modeling.

These assumptions are for rate and bill impact analysis purposes only and do not impact ENS's calculation of energy savings. Category Item Assumption Overall Assumption General approach ENS has used the "snapshot" approach recommended by S...

AI summary The analysis uses a 'snapshot' approach to assess the impacts of specific DSM plans over three years (2016-2018) and the benefits of energy savings from measures installed during that period. This method isolates the impacts of proposed or approved DSM Plans and does not incorporate long-term assessments of DSM.

2.3 Relative Size of Demand-side Resource Investments in Nova Scotia [Figure 1](#page-194-1) includes the investment level proposed by ENS over the 2016-2018 period and approved for 2015, and presents a comparison of both historical demand...

AI summary This section discusses the relative size of demand-side resource investments in Nova Scotia, comparing proposed and approved investment levels over specific periods and showing their proportion of residential revenue requirements. The data indicates that demand-side investments account for 2.4% of average household electricity costs, with a gross monthly cost share of less than $3.45.

The table below summarizes our recommendations: Performance Indicator Target (TPI) Other (OPI) Note on metrics Cumulative Annual Electricity Savings GWh/yr (last year of plan) Cumulative Annual Peak Demand Savings MW (last year of plan) Cu...

AI summary The table outlines performance indicators and targets for energy efficiency programs, including cumulative electricity and peak demand savings, as well as considerations for value and other factors. The focus is on transitioning certain metrics from optional performance indicators to target performance indicators in the next three-year plan.

Table 4: Target performance indicators and Minimum Requirements in DC Target performance indicators Metric Unit Reduced per-capita energy consumption MWh, Mcf Increase renewable energy generating capacity $/kWh Reduced growth in peak deman...

AI summary Table 4 outlines target performance indicators and minimum requirements in the District of Columbia, focusing on energy consumption, renewable energy capacity, peak demand, energy efficiency in low-income housing, and job creation. Metrics include MWh, kW, and FTEs, while minimum requirements are measured in dollars.

Figure 9: Resource Value Framework - NS Qualitative Assessment Program Name: Electric DSM Date: December 2014 1. Key Assumptions, Parameters and S ummary of Resu its Analysis Level ✓ Program Alialysis Level □ Portfolio Measure Life n/a Dis...

AI summary Figure 9 presents a qualitative assessment of the Resource Value Framework for the Electric DSM program in Nova Scotia as of December 2014. It outlines key assumptions, monetized program administrator costs and benefits, participant costs and benefits, public costs and benefits, and non-monetized public benefits.

Table 5: 2014 Savings Targets and Evaluated Results DSM Program "As-Filed" Targets Mid-course Targets Evaluated Results GWh MW GWh MW GWh MW Residential Residential Efficient Products Rebatesa 19.3 3.1 17.5 2.8 13.493 2.520 Existing Reside...

AI summary Table 5 presents the 2014 savings targets and evaluated results for various demand-side management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia, including residential and business, non-profit, and institutional programs. The table compares as-filed targets, mid-course targets, and actual evaluated results in terms of gigawatt-hours (GWh) and megawatts (MW).

2.2 Individual Impact Evaluation Results [Table 6](#page-18-0) and 7 summarize the evaluated savings, the net savings targets revised in June 2014 and the savings tracked internally by ENSC for each program component offered in 2014. Speci...

AI summary Table 6 and 7 summarize evaluated savings, revised net savings targets from June 2014, and internal savings tracking by ENSC for each program component offered in 2014. Observations regarding each program component and initiative are also provided.

Table 7: 2014 Evaluated Results, Targets and Tracked Demand Savings at the Generator 2014 Demand Savings (MW) ENSC DSM Program DSM Component Initial Gross Savings Installed/ Adjusted Gross Savings Installed/Adjusted Gross Savings with Inte...

AI summary Table 7 presents the 2014 evaluated results, targets, and tracked demand savings at the generator for various DSM programs and components, including residential and business initiatives. It includes metrics such as initial gross savings, net savings, and targets for each program, with some notes on evaluation methods.

Business Energy Solutions For 2014, Business Energy Solutions had a total of 761 participants. In addition, 51 participants implemented Rental Properties and Condos Service Common Area measures in 105 separate buildings, and 42 participant...

AI summary In 2014, Business Energy Solutions had 854 participants, achieving net energy savings of 13.175 GWh and peak demand savings of 2.570 MW. Savings were evaluated for lighting, non-lighting, LED Blitz pilot, and Rental Properties and Condos Service common space measures. Differences between tracked and evaluated results were due to adjustments in parameters such as NTGR, ballast factor, heat pump operating hours, and LED lamp unitary savings.

2.6 Overall Performance In 2014, ENSC's program component portfolio achieved a total of 151.888 GWh in net energy savings and 27.077 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator. In addition to the savings generated by ENSC's DSM program...

AI summary In 2014, ENSC achieved its overall energy savings targets through a combination of successful program components and new initiatives. While some program components did not meet their individual goals, others like Custom Incentives and Energy Savings Actions made up for the shortfalls. ENSC has made significant improvements in program tracking, partner relationships, and education efforts. However, some savings calculation parameters were not updated as recommended.

Data-tracking and reporting is crucial for effective program management as well as for evaluation purposes. In 2010, ENSC implemented an online Demand-Side Management Data System (DSMDS) and has been working on its improvement since then....

AI summary Data-tracking and reporting are essential for managing and evaluating energy efficiency programs. ENSC implemented the DSMDS in 2010 and improved it over time, allowing for centralized tracking of projects. However, some program components still use custom tools or external data sources for tracking. The Evaluator praised ENSC's efforts and highlighted areas for improvement in data tracking systems.

Table 12: Recommendations for Instant Savings No. Recommendations Instant-R5. (CEE) Analyze the Consortium for Energy Efficiency Tier III appliances offered. In September of 2014, the CEE Tier III energy performance requirements for refrig...

AI summary The document discusses the need to reassess eligibility criteria for the Instant Savings program due to changes in CEE Tier III appliance standards. ENSC must update criteria to ensure product availability and performance improvements in Nova Scotia, particularly for refrigerators and clothes washers.

Table 13: Recommendations for Green Heat No. Recommendations GH-R5. Similar to the results of the literature review for wood and pellet stoves, the Evaluator did not find any updated studies for wood and pellet furnaces/boilers. Since the...

AI summary The Evaluator recommends retaining current unitary savings figures for wood and pellet furnaces/boilers, as no updated studies are available. These figures are based on past simulations and a 2012 billing analysis, and the limited number of installations makes further analysis difficult.

Table 14: Recommendations for Residential Direct Install No. Recommendations RDI-R5. Set limitations for entries and develop a validation process. The Evaluator found that for some products, a mix of "0" and blank entries were used to indi...

AI summary The document recommends standardizing entries in the DSMDS to address inconsistencies in data reporting, such as the use of '0' and blank entries to indicate no product installation. This standardization would help identify missing entries and improve data accuracy.

No. Recommendations BER-R7. Use a formula to calculate all the projects' total savings. It was found that in some cases, the total savings of a given project were entered manually rather than calculated by a formula that would have added u...

AI summary The recommendation suggests using a formula to calculate total savings for all projects, as manual entry led to errors in tracked savings. This approach would ensure accuracy and consistency in savings calculations.

Table 18: Recommendations for Custom Retrofit No. Recommendations Custom-R9. Supply service providers with a standardized summary document for them to report the actual measures implemented: This document will help ensure that savings and...

AI summary Table 18 recommends providing service providers with a standardized summary document to report actual measures implemented in custom retrofits. The document will clarify savings and costs for each measure, avoid combining non-electrical and electrical savings, and include substantiation approaches such as schedule logs and engineering calculations.

Table 19: Recommendations for Custom New Construction No. Recommendations NC-R4. Adding the Nova Scotia Power's rate code to the DSMDS report: While the Nova Scotia Power's rate code is entered into the DSMDS, it does not appear in the Eva...

AI summary The document recommends adding Nova Scotia Power's rate code to the DSMDS report to facilitate the application of the correct line loss factor when evaluating energy and demand savings at the meter level. This would help in accurately comparing values from the DSMDS report with project feasibility studies and M&V reports.

Table 20: Recommendations for Business Energy Solutions No. Recommendations BES-R8. Plan on the complete and ultimate removal of CFLs and fluorescent T8 tubes from Business Energy Solutions. Business Energy Solutions results showed that sa...

AI summary The document recommends the removal of CFLs and fluorescent T8 tubes from Business Energy Solutions due to declining savings and the increasing cost-effectiveness of LED technology. Savings from these technologies have significantly decreased, and as LED costs drop, their complete removal is planned.

NTGR calculation $NTGR = 1-FR_{total}+SO_{total}$ NTGR= 91% \ Note: For RDI, the NTGR is calculated only for non-low-income participants, and then a weighted average is calculated to take into account low-income participants, whose NTGR is...

AI summary The NTGR calculation is defined as 1 minus the total FR plus the total SO, with a note that for RDI, NTGR is calculated for non-low-income participants and then a weighted average is applied, assuming an NTGR of 1 for low-income participants.

Table 2: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 16.879 GWh 15.92...

AI summary Table 2 compares tracked and evaluated savings from Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) programs, including energy savings and peak demand savings. The table includes metrics such as initial gross savings, installed gross savings, net-to-gross ratio (NTGR), and net savings for both tracked and evaluated results.

a significant proportion of errors in the wattage information entered in the tracking sheet. The Evaluator therefore commends ENSC on this improvement and encourages them to pursue this verification. The tracking sheet also provides inform...

AI summary The Evaluator notes that ENSC has improved data accuracy in the tracking sheet but highlights issues such as missing model numbers and pricing information. The tracking sheet is praised for its conciseness but requires improvements in data completeness for accurate savings calculations.

Displaced Wattage In 2014, the displaced wattage was revised according to the LED wattage values found in the 2014 tracking sheet and the average equivalent lamp wattage values specified by the manufacturer. Last year, the replaced lamp wa...

AI summary In 2014, the displaced wattage methodology was revised to better reflect the actual lamp replacements, considering the share of each type of replaced lamps. The Evaluator used weighted averages of equivalent wattages from incandescent, halogen, CFL, and LED lamps to estimate displaced wattage, particularly for LED lamps, which were found to have a displaced wattage of 18.5 W. The adjustment aligns with the UMP recommendations and affects savings evaluations for Instant Savings.

Hours of Operation To review the hours of operation, the Econoler team has applied some of the principles promoted by the UMP. A metering study specific to Nova Scotia would have been the ideal scenario, but this option was not available d...

AI summary The Econoler team used principles from the Uniform Methods Protocol (UMP) to determine the hours of operation for LED lamps in Nova Scotia's Instant Savings program, relying on secondary data and metering studies of CFLs due to budget constraints and limited LED-specific studies.

SECTION V – VERIFICATION OF PRODUCTS FROM DATABASE V1. and validate the information with the interviewee. From the database, check the products that received the program discount for each campaign April-May Campaign October-November Campai...

AI summary This section outlines the verification process for products that received program discounts during specific campaigns, focusing on regular ENERGY STAR CFLs. It includes questions about sales volume, campaign impact, and the effect of discounts on sales.

APPENDIX IV IN-STORE VISIT PROTOCOL Spring Visit Report Store Name: Address: Date of Visit: Eligible Products $3 - Energy Star Regular CFLs (multipacks of 2 or more) $3 - Energy Star Specialty CFLs (single or double packs) $5 - Energy Star...

AI summary This appendix outlines an in-store visit protocol that includes a list of eligible products and their corresponding rebate amounts for energy-efficient items such as LED bulbs, thermostats, and refrigerators.

Fall Visit Report Store Name: Address: Date of Visit: Eligible Products $3 – Energy Star LED lights (Aline, GU10, Candle/Chandelier) $5 – Energy Star LED lights (PAR, MR and BR) $8 – Energy Star LED light bulbs (packs of 2 or more) $15 – E...

AI summary The document outlines eligible products and their respective rebate amounts for energy-efficient upgrades, including LED lights, thermostats, and refrigerators, under a program offering financial incentives for Energy Star certified products.

Atlantic Superstore Lighting Promotional Material Yes No # Bin Violators Posters Stickers Manual Signs Comments: Home Depot Lighting Controls Thermostats Appliances Promotional Material Yes No # Yes No # Yes No # Yes No # Shelf Talkers Pos...

AI summary The document contains tables related to promotional materials and signage for lighting, controls, thermostats, and appliances at Atlantic Superstore and Home Depot. The tables include columns for the presence of promotional materials, bin violators, posters, stickers, manual signs, and comments, but no detailed information is provided.

3.1.3 Validated Gross Savings The annual gross savings tracked for the building envelope measures and the prescriptive measures implemented in 2014 were validated by the Evaluator and are presented in the table below. Overall, the validate...

AI summary The document presents validated gross energy and peak demand savings for 2014, including both meter and generator levels. The energy savings at the meter are 4.493 GWh, and at the generator, they are 4.943 GWh after applying a line loss factor of 1.100. Similarly, peak demand savings at the meter are 1.105 MW, and at the generator, they are 1.216 MW.

Revised Savings The Evaluator reviewed the unitary savings values used for all the types of Green Heat equipment by performing a literature review. The research mainly focused on identifying more recent technical reference guides, and rece...

AI summary The Evaluator reviewed unitary savings values for Green Heat equipment, focusing on central ducted, geothermal, and air-to-water heat pumps. The OPA’s 2014 Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions List underestimates savings when replacing electric resistance heat. The PUC’s 2015 Technical Resource Manual provides EFLH-based formulas adaptable to Nova Scotia’s climate.

Table 15: Adjustment Ratio for Heat Pump as Initial Heating System New Equipment Adjustment Ratio for Energy Savings Adjustment Ratio for Peak Demand Savings Pellet Stoves 0.973 0.973 Geothermal Heat Pump 0.886 0.891 Central Ducted Heat Pu...

AI summary Table 15 presents adjustment ratios for energy and peak demand savings for different heating systems, including heat pumps. ENSC previously considered the same savings for participants with various initial heating systems, but heat pump users were ineligible unless their electricity consumption exceeded 21,000 kWh/year.

1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Low Income Homeowner (LIH) undertaken by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) aims to facilitate the implementation of cost-effective building envelope measures in homes owned by lowincome customers across Nova S...

AI summary The Low Income Homeowner (LIH) program, managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), provides cost-effective building envelope improvements and energy-efficient appliance replacements at no cost to low-income homeowners. Measures are funded by electricity ratepayers for electrically heated homes and provincial funds for non-electrically heated homes. The program also includes the Residential Direct Install (RDI) component, which offers low-cost energy-efficient products. In 2014, LIH aimed to achieve 1.9 GWh of electricity savings and 0.4 MW of peak demand savings.

2.1.2 Building Envelope Measures Using Modelled Energy Consumptions For the 394 participants with modeled energy consumption data available, building envelope measures' savings were calculated using the new method implemented in 2013. Inst...

AI summary The document discusses the method used by ENSC to calculate building envelope measure savings based on modeled energy consumption data from HOT2000 simulations and the percentage of electrical heating. It notes the continued use of an 18% overestimation factor from a 2012 billing analysis in the calculation formula.

Tracked Savings ENSC promoted the replacement of old refrigerators with more efficient models through LIH. For this appliance replacement measure, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 986 kWh per year. This figure is based on the average c...

AI summary ENSC promoted replacing old refrigerators with more efficient models through LIH, using a unitary savings value of 986 kWh per year based on the ARet 2013 Evaluation Report. The savings are calculated by comparing the average consumption of old appliances (1,394 kWh/year) with new ENERGY STAR® models (408 kWh/year).

Revised Savings The Evaluator updated the unitary savings by using the average consumption value of old appliances replaced and the average consumption value of ENERGY STAR® refrigerators from the ARet3 2014 Evaluation Report. Since the LI...

AI summary The Evaluator updated unitary savings calculations by using the average consumption of old appliances replaced and new ENERGY STAR® refrigerators from the 2014 ARet evaluation. It considers the average size and energy consumption of old refrigerators and assumes no part-use factor due to the low likelihood of two refrigerators in a low-income household.

Revised Savings In 2014, the majority of the new models installed were ENERGY STAR® models (98 %), but non-ENERGY STAR® models were also installed when ENERGY STAR® models of the same size were not available. In fact, Energy Star has recen...

AI summary In 2014, Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) installed mostly ENERGY STAR® freezers, but non-ENERGY STAR® models were used when smaller sizes were unavailable. The Evaluator updated savings calculations to reflect the installation of non-ENERGY STAR® freezers and used data from the ARet 2014 Evaluation Report to establish average consumption values for both old and new freezers, resulting in a weighted unitary savings value of 496 kWh per year.

2.1.5 Validated Gross Savings The annual gross savings for the building envelope measures and the prescriptive measures implemented in 2014 were validated by the Evaluator and are presented in the following table. Overall, the validated gr...

AI summary The annual gross energy and peak demand savings from building envelope and prescriptive measures implemented in 2014 were validated and amount to 2.101 GWh and 0.490 MW at the meter. Using a line loss factor of 1.100, the estimated savings at the generator are 2.311 GWh and 0.539 MW.

Table 4: Validated Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings Building Envelope Measures Prescriptive Measures Product Category Modelled Heating Consumption Savings per EnerGuide Point Increase Refrigerator Replacement Freezer Replacement Dehumi...

AI summary Table 4 presents validated gross energy and peak demand savings across various product categories and measures. The data includes total number of units, unitary savings, and total gross energy and peak demand savings at both the meter and generator levels, along with line loss factors and demand-to-energy ratios.

Table 5: Validated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings Building I Meas Prescriptive Measures ) Product Category Modelled Heating Consumption Savings per EnerGuide Point Increase Refrigerator Replacement Freezer Replacement Dehumidifier Repl...

AI summary Table 5 presents validated net energy and peak demand savings from various measures, including refrigerator, freezer, and dehumidifier replacements, with energy savings measured in GWh and peak demand savings in MW. The table includes factors such as Interactive Effects Factor, NTGR, and Line Loss Factor.

3.1 Gross Savings The final tracking sheet provided by ENSC for 2014 contained a total of 846 participants. To establish the gross energy savings associated with each of these participants, the Evaluator used an average savings per EnerGui...

AI summary The final tracking sheet from ENSC in 2014 had 846 participants. Gross energy savings were calculated using an average savings per EnerGuide point increase from HEA data, while peak demand savings used a demand-to-energy ratio.

Savings per EnerGuide Point In 2014, ENSC calculated energy savings linked to building envelope measures using an incremental savings coefficient per increase of EnerGuide point (also referred to as "savings per EnerGuide point"). In the 2...

AI summary In 2014, ENSC calculated energy savings per EnerGuide point, using an incremental savings coefficient. The calculation was based on an average of 882 kWh per EnerGuide point, but only applied when the main heat source was electricity. ENSC did not claim electrical energy savings when the main heat source was not electricity.

Revised Savings To revise the savings, the Evaluator consulted various technical reference manuals from similar jurisdictions. It was found that the savings per foot of pipe varied significantly. For instance, the Mid-Atlantic 2013 TRM19 c...

AI summary The Evaluator revised savings estimates for pipe insulation based on the OPA's 38 kWh per 3 ft assumption, considering realistic heat loss hours and insulation thickness. The decision to not cap insulation length was made after on-site visits showed effective heat loss reduction in homes with extensive insulation, even beyond 15 ft.

5.1.11 Revised Gross Savings The annual gross savings for each category of products installed through the program are presented in Table 22. They were calculated using the revised unitary savings values presented in the previous section. O...

AI summary The annual gross savings for products installed through the program are detailed, with total energy and peak demand savings at the meter being 28.019 GWh and 6.528 MW. Using a line loss factor of 1.100, the generator-level savings are estimated at 30.821 GWh and 7.181 MW.

(Continued) LED L amps Low-F Flow Showe erhead 11-4 14/-4 Tatalifan Category of Product 12W Replacing 60W 12W Replacing 100W LED Nightlights Faucet Aerator 0.75 gpm Reduction Pipe Insulation Hot Water Tank Wrap Smart Power Controllers Tota...

AI summary The text presents a detailed table summarizing energy savings from various efficiency programs, including LED lighting, faucet aerators, pipe insulation, and smart power controllers. It includes metrics such as total number of units installed, energy savings, and peak demand savings, calculated using factors like installation rates and line loss.

Table 24: Interactive Effect Factors for CFLs, LED Lamps and LED Nightlights Category of Product % Indoor % Outdoor Interactive Effect Factor CFL 86% 14% (86% × -24.0%) + (14% × 0%) = -20.6% LED Lamp 88% 12% (88% × -24.0%) + (12% × 0%) = -...

AI summary The document presents interactive effect factors for CFLs, LED lamps, and LED nightlights, showing how their energy efficiency impacts heating and cooling loads. It also discusses insulation and hot water tank wraps, with interactive effects of -100% during heating and +100% during cooling. A weighted interactive effect factor of -24.2% is calculated based on heating and cooling periods in the Halifax region.

Table 27: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product C F Ls Sa in To l Ne En ta t er g g s y v – ( G W h ) t m te a e r 0. 1 0 1 3. 6 4 7 0. 1 2 8 0. 0 0 4 0. 1 7 7 1. 4 0 2 0. 0 4 4 L ine Lo Fa to ss c r 1. 1 0 0 1. 1 0 0 1....

AI summary Table 27 presents evaluated net energy and peak demand savings by product, including metrics such as total net energy savings in gigawatt-hours and total peak demand savings in megawatts for various products like CFLs and LEDs.

Water Heating Electricity per Load The percentage of hot water produced electrically was then determined. The percentage of washers with their own electrical resistance to heat water was assumed to be insignificant, as this information was...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of electricity use for water heating per laundry load, based on data from 2007 and 2014, estimating that 71% of water is heated electrically, resulting in 0.36 kWh of electricity use per load.

This Appendix summarizes all the recommendations made by the Evaluator throughout this report as well as the sections from which the recommendations originated. Sections Recommendations 2 Follow up with DAs to identify the cause of entry e...

AI summary The appendix highlights a recommendation to investigate entry errors by DAs, as discrepancies in installation rates were observed during on-site visits, impacting the gross savings evaluated in 2014. ENSC's quality assurance program did not identify the same issues.

Table 10: Validated Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Ty f Pr du t p e o o c 1 3- W t C t a F L 1 3- W t C t a L O F do t u or 1 4- W t C t a F L 1 4- W t C t a L O F do t u or 2 3- W t C t a F L 2 3- W t C t a L O F do t u o...

AI summary Table 10 presents validated gross energy and peak demand savings by product type, with each row containing numerical data for various product categories. The data appears to be consistent across all product types, with each entry showing a value of 1.099.

(Continued) Type of Product 10-Watt LED A- Lamp 10-Watt LED Dim. A-Lamp LED Nightlight Low-Flow Faucet Aerator Low-Flow Shower- head Low-Flow Shower- wand Pipe Insulation Tank Wrap Hot Water Tank Wrap (RSI-1.21) Energy Savings Number of Un...

AI summary The document presents a detailed table of energy savings data for various products, including LED lamps, low-flow faucets, and insulation materials. It includes metrics such as the number of units installed, energy savings in GWh, and peak demand savings in MW. The data provides a comprehensive overview of the impact of these energy efficiency measures.

2.1.1 Adjustment Ratios During the 2013 impact evaluation, the Econoler team evaluated the savings values calculated by ENSC for solar DHW systems by reviewing the RETScreen simulation and conducting sites visit for 11 projects. The inform...

AI summary In 2013, the Econoler team evaluated ENSC's savings values for solar DHW systems and air space heating systems using RETScreen simulations and site visits. An adjustment ratio of 1.028 was applied to DHW systems, while a 1.000 adjustment ratio was used for air space heating systems based on similar findings.

Table 4: Validated Gross Savings Measure Category DHW Air Space Heating Total Program Tracking Sheet Number of Projects 30 3 33 Tracked Energy Savings (GWh) 0.0806 0.0035 0.0841 Validated Energy Savings Adjustment Ratio 1.028 1.000 - Total...

AI summary Table 4 presents validated gross savings from energy efficiency measures, showing energy savings tracked and adjusted for factors like line loss and adjustment ratios, categorized by measure type such as domestic hot water and air space heating.

2 IMPACT EVALUATION The purpose of the impact evaluation is to determine the gross and net savings of LHLE in 2014. To this end, Econoler reviewed the unitary savings calculations of ENSC by comparing them with those made by other jurisdic...

AI summary The impact evaluation assesses the gross and net energy savings of the LED Holiday Light Exchange (LHLE) in 2014. Econoler reviewed Efficiency Nova Scotia's (ENSC) unitary savings calculations and updated assumptions based on a 2014 in-field survey. Gross energy and peak demand savings were calculated, and net savings were determined by considering the interactive effects of replacing traditional lights with LED lights.

Displaced Wattage Based on former in-field observations, ENSC established the percentages of old sets that were returned among three different types of incandescent light sets. The lamp wattages used for the different types of old sets tha...

AI summary The document discusses the validation of wattage values for old incandescent light sets based on various studies and sources, including Pacific Gas and Electric Company, BC Hydro, Ontario Power Authority, and the Technical Reference Manual from the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission and California Municipal Utilities Association. The wattage values used by ENSC for large and mini incandescent bulbs are deemed appropriate.

2.1.4 Total Gross Savings The gross savings of LHLE for 2014 were calculated by multiplying the unitary savings value of 29 kWh established during this evaluation with the number of LED sets exchanged through LHLE in the fall of 2014. For...

AI summary The gross savings from the LED Holiday Light Exchange (LHLE) in 2014 were calculated using a unitary savings value of 29 kWh and the number of LED sets exchanged. Total gross energy and peak demand savings were 0.184 GWh and 0.396 MW at the meter, and 0.202 GWh and 0.435 MW at the generator level after applying a line loss factor of 1.100.

3.2 Program Documentation As part of the evaluation, the Evaluator analyzed the program documentation and worked together with the PM to improve and revise the content of certain program documents. A number of changes have already been mad...

AI summary The Evaluator reviewed program documentation for the Home Energy Report (HER) and recommended updates to improve clarity and completeness. Key recommendations include updating participant numbers, adding home age criteria for group selection, and enhancing the tip library with an index and categorization. The Evaluator also suggested removing the gross savings calculation from the evaluation plan and ensuring all available data is included.

Table 22: Web-based Component Evaluation Results for 2013 – Total Net Energy Savings Pr du t Ca te o c g or y En er g y f f ic ie t e n D is hw he as r En er g y f f ic ie t e n Ro A ir om d i t io co n ne r In la te su W in do w s i t h H...

AI summary Table 22 provides evaluation results for web-based components in 2013, focusing on total net energy savings. It includes metrics such as energy efficiency in dishwashers, air conditioners, windows with heat film, reducing shower time, and other categories. The data highlights energy savings across various product categories.

This Appendix presents all recommendations made by the Evaluator throughout this report as well as the sections from which the recommendations originated. Sections Recommendations Pilot Design and Evaluation 5 The Evaluator recommends that...

AI summary The appendix outlines two recommendations by the Evaluator. The first suggests that ENSC continue collecting data on financing requests and defaults for performance indicators. The second highlights the challenge of low creditworthiness among potential participants and recommends eliminating this barrier, even though alternative financing options are being considered.

BER Instant Rebates Product Types - › CEE electronic ballasts › LED high bay fixtures - › CEE T8 lamps › LED troffer - › Wall pack induction lamp fixtures › LED strip lighting - › LED decorative walkways › T5 high bay fixtures - › High bay...

AI summary The BER Instant Rebates program offers rebates for various energy-efficient lighting products, aiming to achieve 27.0 GWh of energy savings and 4.8 MW of peak demand savings in 2014. The product types include LED and induction lighting solutions.

Table 2: Overall Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator for BER Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings Gross Savings Adjusted with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 32...

AI summary The evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program in 2014 showed slightly higher net energy savings compared to tracked savings, but lower peak demand savings. Adjustments in savings calculations for HVAC and lighting increased gross energy savings, while a lower NTGR and lack of diversity factors in tracking reduced net and peak demand savings, respectively.

- 2014 BER-R3. Implement recommended changes to savings calculations in a timely manner. Once again this year, the Evaluator found that not many modifications to savings calculations recommended in last year's evaluation report were made....

AI summary The Evaluator recommends that ENSC implement changes to savings calculations for air-source heat pumps and improve the tracking system for BER Instant Rebate. Specific improvements include linking the Masterlist tab with the Reporting tab using product codes and separating variables for easier validation.

BER Mail-in Measure Categories - › Agricultural technologies › Commercial laundry - › Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) › Motors and variable speed drives (VSDs) - › Commercial lighting › Commercial kitchen - › Commercial re...

AI summary The BER Mail-in Measure Categories outline eligible technologies for rebates, including HVAC, lighting, and commercial equipment. Some lighting products, such as LED tubes, had increased rebate amounts during a promotional period in 2014, tracked separately as 'Promotional Rebate'.

BER Instant Rebates Product Types - › CEE T8 lamps › LED troffer - › Wall pack induction lamp fixtures › LED strip lighting - › LED decorative walkways › T5 high bay fixtures - › CEE electronic ballasts › LED high bay fixtures - › High bay...

AI summary The BER Instant Rebates Product Types include various lighting products such as LED troffers, LED strip lighting, and T5 high bay fixtures. These products are now submitted under BER, which aimed for 27.0 GWh of electricity savings and 4.8 MW of peak demand savings in 2014. Energy savings are accounted for under the BNI Efficient Products Rebates.

2.2.4 Unitary Savings Review for Instant Rebates To review the unitary savings values used in the tracking sheet, the Econoler team validated the parameters currently used in the tracked savings calculations by conducting a literature revi...

AI summary The Econoler team reviewed unitary savings values for instant rebates by validating parameters through a literature review of technical reference manuals and public evaluation reports, and used engineering calculations when reliable data sources were not available.

2.2.5 Project Review and On-site Visits In the fall of 2014, 70 on-site visits were conducted at the facilities of participants who applied for BER Mail-in. These visits were conducted by Equilibrium. However, 12 visits were removed from t...

AI summary In 2014, 70 on-site visits were conducted by Equilibrium to validate BER Mail-in project implementations. Twelve visits were excluded from the sample, including five where verification was not yet completed and seven involving ECMs with recurring quality issues. The visits aimed to ensure proper implementation and verify operational data and equipment characteristics to adjust savings calculations.

3.1 Participation in BER In 2014, BER had a total of 296 participants, compared to 270 in 2013, 175 in 2012 and 106 in 2011. These 296 participants included 98 participants in the promotional rebate on LED tubes for fluorescent fixtures, w...

AI summary BER participation increased in 2014 due to a promotional rebate on LED tubes, but regular participation declined slightly, partly because some ECM projects were removed from the tracking system due to quality issues.

asing participant burden and making the participation process more difficult. Requiring participants to provide photographs of the products to replace would also require them to have a digital camera. Two recommendations were only partiall...

AI summary The 2012 recommendations for improving the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program were only partially implemented. A reference table for wattage values was created in 2014, but it lacks some necessary reference values for verification. Additionally, changes to the BER Instant Rebates calculation methods from 2012-2013 have not been fully updated in recent years.

2013 Executive Summary Recommendations Six of the seven recommendations were either implemented by ENSC or are in the process of being implemented. In acting on these recommendations, ENSC collaborated more closely with distributors and re...

AI summary In 2013, ENSC implemented or began implementing six of seven recommendations from an executive summary. Issues arose with rebate structures, leading to distributor losses and tension, which was later resolved. ENSC relaxed rebate processing requirements and joined the DLC, improving procedures. However, malfunctioning equipment and lack of contractor reporting led to program issues and the contractor's suspension from BER.

3.3 Program Documentation and Design As part of the evaluation, the Evaluator analyzed the program documentation and worked together with the PM to improve and revise the content of the program manual, the evaluation plan and the logic mod...

AI summary The Evaluator reviewed and revised program documentation for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, including the program manual, evaluation plan, and logic model. ENSC introduced a project workflow checklist integrated into the DSMDS to improve administrative procedures and data accuracy.

BER Instant Rebates BER Instant Rebates is currently not managed through the DSMDS on a day-to-day basis, which means the Evaluator reviewed the compilation of all the products sold at each participating distributor in the Excel sheet prov...

AI summary The BER Instant Rebates program is not managed through the DSMDS, leading to manual review of Excel data provided by ENSC. The Masterlist and Reporting tabs in the Excel sheet contain product details and savings equations, allowing accurate calculation of discrepancies in savings. However, manual verification remains necessary due to a lack of automated validation tools.

4 MARKET EVALUATION This section presents the findings of the 2014 BER market evaluation from the partner and participant perspectives.

AI summary This section presents the findings of the 2014 BER market evaluation from the partner and participant perspectives.

Table 8: Reasons for Participating 2012 2014 Motivations Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Sample Size 56 56 27 27 Save on energy costs/bills 55% 32% 59% 2...

AI summary Table 8 presents data on participants' motivations for joining energy efficiency programs in 2012 and 2014. The primary motivation was saving on energy costs, with a significant decline in the percentage of participants citing this reason over time. Other motivations included taking advantage of program incentives, updating equipment, and environmental concerns.

Table 9: Satisfaction with BER Satisfaction with BER 2012 2 2014 Aspect of BER Sample Size % Satisfied Sample Size % Satisfied Interactions and communications with contractors, distributors or consultants 56 91% 25 88% Program overall 56 9...

AI summary Table 9 presents customer satisfaction data for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program in 2012 and 2014. The data highlights high levels of satisfaction across various aspects, including interactions with contractors, rebate amounts, and program application processes, though satisfaction slightly decreases in 2014 for some categories.

5 IMPACT EVALUATION FOR BER MAIL-IN The objective of the 2014 impact evaluation for BER Mail-in was to determine the gross and net energy savings. Both electrical energy and peak demand savings were estimated by analyzing the following par...

AI summary The 2014 impact evaluation for BER Mail-in aimed to assess gross and net energy savings by analyzing parameters such as installation rates, equipment features, and load factors. Interactive effects were considered for lighting measures but not for others. Adjustments and diversity factors were established based on documentation and on-site visits.

5.1 Gross Savings In 2014, the BER Mail-In tracking sheet contained a total of 446 projects implemented by 198 participants across 10 different measure categories. In addition to the regular measure categories, 137 projects with promotiona...

AI summary In 2014, the BER Mail-In tracking sheet reported 446 projects by 198 participants. However, 22 projects were removed from the evaluation due to issues with a specific contractor, including premature ECM failures and poor customer service. The Evaluator used on-site visits and the '2014 BER – Measure Equations Tool' to review ENSC's gross savings estimates.

p energy savings was the number of FLH hours. As stated in the 2013 evaluation report, the AHRI Standard 210/240 5 has set the equivalent full-load hours in Region V at 2,750 hours per year. In fact, this adjustment had to be made for ever...

AI summary The evaluation of HVAC measures, particularly air-source heat pumps, involved adjusting full-load hours (FLH) and nominal heating capacity based on the AHRI Standard 210/240. These adjustments were necessary to align with Nova Scotia's climate and improve accuracy in savings calculations. Some errors in the tracking sheet also required corrections.

5.1.2 Commercial Lighting Measures A total of 25 on-site visits were conducted for the lighting measures category; however, as mentioned above, three projects were eliminated from the data analysis because they were incomplete at the time...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of commercial lighting measures, including on-site visits, adjustments to tracked savings, and the impact of ballast factors on energy savings calculations. Over 80% of projects involved LED measures, and the evaluation highlights the importance of considering ballast factors in calculating energy savings.

Where: Wlamp represents the nominal wattage of the lamp. It should be noted that for some LED products, the specification sheet presents the wattage of the lamp based on a given ballast factor, in which case the ballast factor is already i...

AI summary The document discusses adjustments made to lighting energy and demand savings calculations in 22 projects. Adjustments were made due to discrepancies in wattage specifications, operation hours, and seasonal variations. An overall adjustment ratio of 1.035 was applied to energy savings, and 0.777 to demand savings. These adjustments were also applied to additional lighting projects in a separate tracking report.

l those projects that do not function properly as expected, a site visit should be conducted to validate what was modified to the initial installation and calculate the savings based on the new setup. Only one project this year included on...

AI summary The Evaluator recommends adding a question about redundancy in the worksheet to prevent reduced VSD measure savings. The default energy and demand savings factors in the CIRx tool are outdated, and the Massachusetts 2013-2015 TRM methodology is suggested as a more accurate alternative. This methodology considers motor efficiency, building type, and equipment function, but ENSC currently does not collect motor efficiency data, which needs to be added to the application package.

5.1.5 Compressed Air Measures The compressed air measure category was evaluated by conducting four on-site visits. Adjustments were made to the tracked energy and demand savings of three of the four projects. Similar to 2013, the hours of...

AI summary The compressed air measure category was evaluated through four on-site visits, leading to adjustments in energy and demand savings for three of the four projects. Adjustments were made due to differences in hours of operation and airflow values, resulting in a 7.1% decrease in total energy savings and a 6.1% decrease in total demand savings.

5.1.6 Agricultural Measures The agricultural measure category was evaluated by conducting five on-site visits in 2014. The number of cows was decreased for two of the projects. For one project, the reduction was made because the number of...

AI summary The agricultural measure category was evaluated through five on-site visits in 2014, leading to several adjustments in energy and demand savings calculations. Issues included incorrect cow numbers, discrepancies in VSD installations, and algorithmic errors. The overall energy savings were reduced by 7.8%, and demand savings by 8.6%, due to these adjustments.

5.1.8 Commercial Laundry Measures One commercial laundry project was validated in 2014. No adjustments were needed, as the data was complete and accurate. The tracked energy savings were 965 kWh, and the tracked demand savings were 3.46 kW.

AI summary A commercial laundry project validated in 2014 achieved tracked energy savings of 965 kWh and demand savings of 3.46 kW, with no adjustments needed due to complete and accurate data.

5.1.10 Solar Measures One solar thermal project was implemented in 2014. The RETScreen ® file provided for the project indicated a 50 percent occupancy rate. The participant declared that the building would be utilized all year round this...

AI summary A solar thermal project implemented in 2014 had its energy savings adjusted based on occupancy rate changes. The Evaluator adjusted the occupancy rate from 50% to 100%, increasing tracked energy savings from 0.004 GWh to 0.005 GWh, while demand savings remained unchanged at 0.008 MW.

Table 12: Diversity Factors for BER Mail-in Category of Measure Diversity Factor HVAC 98% Commercial Lighting 84% Commercial Refrigeration 84% Motors and VSDs 72% Compressed Air 39% Agricultural 80% Commercial Kitchen 96% Water Heating 100...

AI summary Table 12 outlines diversity factors for various energy efficiency measures under the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, indicating the percentage of diversity each measure contributes to the overall program.

5.1.12 Revised Gross Savings The savings achieved by every category of BER Mail-in measure are presented in Table 13. Both the energy and demand savings were revised by incorporating the adjustments discussed in the previous sections. Usin...

AI summary This section presents revised gross energy and demand savings for the BER Mail-in program, incorporating adjustments from prior sections. The savings are calculated using a line loss factor of 1.068 and a diversity factor, resulting in 12.902 GWh of energy savings and 1.988 MW of peak demand savings at the meter, with higher values at the generator.

5.3 Net Savings The net savings for BER Mail-in were estimated using the NTGR. Since interactive effects were already included in the gross savings calculations of the lighting projects, no other factor had to be applied. The following equ...

AI summary The net savings for the BER Mail-in program were calculated using the NTGR, with results showing total energy and peak demand savings for 2013 at both the meter and generator levels.

Table 14: Evaluation Results – Revised Net Savings – BER Mail-in Category of Measure HVAC Lighting Refrige ration Motors and VSDs Compressed Air Agricultural Energy Savings Total Gross Energy Savings – at Meter (GWh) 3.013 4.786 0.128 1.26...

AI summary Table 14 presents evaluation results for the Revised Net Savings from the BER Mail-in program, detailing energy and peak demand savings across various categories of measures, including HVAC, Lighting, and Compressed Air, with calculations involving Net-to-Gross Ratio and Line Loss Factor.

(Continued) Category of Measure Kitchen Water Heating Laundry Solar LED Promotion Total Energy Savings Total Gross Energy Savings – at Meter (GWh) 0.376 0.057 0.003 0.005 2.765 12.902 NTGR 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 1.00 - Total Net Energy Saving...

AI summary Table 15 compares energy and peak demand savings from the mail-in rebate approach with those calculated in the 2014 tracking system, presenting data across categories like kitchen, water heating, and solar, along with metrics such as gross and net energy savings and peak demand savings.

6.1 Gross Savings This section presents the tracked and revised savings for each product category rebated under BER Instant Rebates. This year, the Evaluator reviewed the consistency of hours of operation and equations used for all the pro...

AI summary This section discusses the evaluation of gross savings for BER Instant Rebates, noting revisions to baseline wattage for T8 lamps and CEE-listed ballasts based on Canadian regulations. The Evaluator recommends improving energy savings equations and monitoring market changes due to upcoming regulatory amendments.

Revised Savings The types of T8 products sold through BER Instant Rebates are identical to last year's products. Therefore, the Evaluator considers the displaced wattages to be valid for this year. As no new metering activity was conducted...

AI summary The document discusses the unchanged product types and savings calculations for T8 products under the BER Instant Rebates program. It notes the need to monitor market changes, as more efficient products like LED T8 lamps may shift the baseline. This trend is already evident in on-site visits for BER and BES programs.

Tracked Savings The tracked unitary savings are based on the results of last year's evaluation, which were established based on the different ballast displaced wattage values and the proportion accounted for in the 2013 total sales by each...

AI summary Tracked unitary savings are calculated based on last year's evaluation, comparing the wattage of high-performance ballasts with T8 lamps to magnetic ballasts with T12 lamps. A weighted average is calculated for each lamp/ballast combination, excluding savings from energy-efficient lamps.

Table 17: Unitary Savings Values for High-performance Ballasts Type of Ballast Demand Savings (W) Hours of Operation (hrs/year) Energy Savings (kWh/year) 1-lamp ballast 13.46 3,400 45.76 2-lamp ballast 13.46 3,400 45.76 3-lamp ballast 24.3...

AI summary Table 17 presents unitary savings values for high-performance ballasts, including demand savings, hours of operation, and energy savings per year for different types of ballasts. The table includes 1-lamp, 2-lamp, 3-lamp, and 4-lamp ballasts with corresponding energy savings values.

Similar to previous years' evaluations, the revised displaced wattage for each ballast type was calculated using the proportion of each type of T8 lamp accounted for in the total sales through the BER Instant Rebate initiative. The baselin...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of revised displaced wattage for T8 lamp ballasts using data from the BER Instant Rebate initiative. It notes that baseline wattage values from 2012 remain valid based on Canadian regulations, but ENSC should monitor future efficiency standard changes and adjust the baseline if needed.

Table 18: Revised Displaced Wattages for Each Ballast Type New Ballast and Lamp Systems Baseline Wattage New Wattage Lamp ΔW Ballast ΔW Proportion of T8 Lamps Average Ballast ΔW 1-lamp ballast with HP-T8-32 W lamp 43 27 2 14 61.4% 1-lamp b...

AI summary Table 18 presents revised displaced wattages for various ballast and lamp systems. The data includes baseline and new wattage values, differences in lamp and ballast wattages, and the proportion of T8 lamps. The table is used to calculate revised unitary savings values for 2014, using the same annual hours of operation as in 2013.

Table 19: Revised Unitary Savings Values for High-performance Ballasts Type of Ballast Demand Savings (W) Hours of Operation (hrs/year) Energy Savings (kWh/year) 1-lamp ballast 13.61 3,400 46.27 2-lamp ballast 13.61 3,400 46.27 3-lamp ball...

AI summary Table 19 presents revised unitary savings values for high-performance ballasts, detailing demand savings, hours of operation, and energy savings for different types of ballasts.

Tracked Savings BER Instant Rebates included various LED products, such as downlights, outdoor wall packs, decorative lighting, garage lighting, high and low bay fixtures, strip lighting and troffers. For each LED product category, the sav...

AI summary The BER Instant Rebates program included various LED products, with savings calculations based on differences in wattage and hours of operation. The hours of operation used in the calculations did not align with those recommended in the previous year's evaluation.

6.1.9 Diversity Factor As no on-site visits were conducted for BER Instant Rebates, no specific diversity factor could be established. Hence, the diversity factor of 83 percent used by the BER Mail-In approach to lighting products was also...

AI summary The diversity factor of 83 percent, used by the BER Mail-In approach for lighting products, was applied to BER Instant Rebates due to the similarity of products sold by both initiatives and the lack of on-site visits for BER Instant Rebates.

6.1.10 Revised Gross Savings Energy and demand savings associated with the instant rebate approach were calculated using the unitary savings values revised under this evaluation. Savings at the generator were also calculated using a line l...

AI summary The instant rebate approach's energy and demand savings were calculated using revised unitary savings values. Total energy savings were 18.002 GWh at the meter and 19.209 GWh at the generator, with peak demand savings of 4.260 MW and 4.545 MW respectively.

6.2 Interactive Effects As in past year's evaluations, the Evaluator based the calculation of the interactive effects on a study conducted in 1992 by ADS for Hydro-Québec. The interactive effects factor is calculated by using a weighted pr...

AI summary The evaluation of interactive effects for BER Instant Rebates uses data from the 2014 BES onsite visits, showing a decrease in the interactive effects factor from -13.0% in 2013 to -5.6% in 2014, due to increased air conditioning and non-electric heating in buildings.

6.4 Net Savings Net energy savings for BER Instant Rebates were estimated by adding the interactive effects and the NTGR to the gross energy savings using the following equation: Net energy savings = Gross energy savings × (1 + Interactive...

AI summary The document explains how net energy savings for BER Instant Rebates were calculated using an equation that incorporates gross energy savings, interactive effects, and NTGR. The total net energy and peak demand savings were calculated separately for each product and totaled 12.687 GWh and 3.002 MW at the meter, and 13.537 GWh and 3.203 MW at the generator.

7 OVERALL BER RESULTS This section summarizes the overall results of the impact evaluation of BER. With combined net savings generated from both the mail-in rebate and the instant rebate approaches, the total energy and peak demand savings...

AI summary The impact evaluation of the BER program shows that combined net savings from both mail-in and instant rebate approaches resulted in 24.610 GWh of energy savings and 4.880 MW of peak demand savings.

Table 28: Overall Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator for BER Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 3...

AI summary Table 28 compares tracked and evaluated savings from the BER program, showing discrepancies between initial and adjusted gross savings for energy and peak demand. The table highlights the impact of interactive effects and NTGR on net savings, with evaluation results differing from tracked savings.

CONCLUSION The 2014 evaluation of BER demonstrated that most of the recommendations pertaining to process issues made in the previous evaluations have been implemented. The Evaluator commends ENSC on its efforts in improving and optimizing...

AI summary The 2014 evaluation of the BER program noted that process improvements have been made, including better tracking systems and collaboration with distributors. However, savings calculations have not improved significantly. Survey results showed high participant satisfaction, but some found the process difficult due to information gaps and communication issues.

ASK IF LED DOWNLIGHTS WERE REBATED THROUGH THE PROGRAM I have a few questions about your sales of LED downlights that are promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program. LED downlights include LED screw-in lamps, LED pin-based lamps, LED...

AI summary The text asks whether LED downlights were rebated through the Business Energy Rebates Program, inquiring about sales trends, the impact of the program on sales, and the percentage of sales attributed to residential users. It also explores the potential effect of removing the incentive on sales.

Yes S4. Finally, do you have any suggestions to improve the program? No S2. The program support and communications S3. The rebate processing, tracking and reporting S1. The overall program Aspects of the program a. Score b. Reason Please s...

AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, focusing on customer satisfaction, program effectiveness, and the influence of incentives on product choices. Respondents are asked about their satisfaction with various aspects of the program, the adequacy of incentives, and the impact of the program on customer behavior.

[INTRODUCTION] Hello, I am with CRA (Corporate Research Associates), and we are performing an evaluation of energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Our records indicate that you or your firm recently part...

AI summary CRA is conducting an evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Business Energy Rebates Program and is reaching out to participants for feedback. The survey aims to help improve the program and will take about fifteen minutes to complete.

Satisfaction [S series] - S1. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1='not at all satisfied' and 5='very satisfied', how was your company or organization's experience with each OF THE FOLLOWING aspects of the Business Energy Rebates Program? If your...

AI summary The text outlines a survey assessing satisfaction with the Business Energy Rebates Program, focusing on aspects such as application processes, eligibility confirmation, rebate amounts, and overall program experience. It includes rating scales and open-ended questions for feedback on challenges and recommendations.

VOLUNTEERED - 98. (Don't know) - 99. (Refused) - S6. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1='not at all likely' and 5='very likely', how likely will your company or organization be to purchase energy efficient products, including but not limited to...

AI summary The text includes survey questions related to business energy efficiency product purchases and rebate processing times. Respondents are asked to rate their likelihood of purchasing energy-efficient products and to report the time taken to receive mail-in rebates from ENSC.

S10. Thinking of when you completed and sent your post-install mail-in rebate application to ENSC, how long, in weeks, was it before you received your mail-in rebate? Length of Time to Receive Rebate 2014 (#) Sample Size 17 3-4 weeks 7 5-8...

AI summary The text presents survey data on the time taken to receive mail-in rebates from ENSC, the likelihood of future energy-efficient product purchases, and barriers faced in implementing energy-efficient measures. It includes statistics from 2012 and 2014, with sample sizes and percentages provided.

FR2d. DO NOT POSE FR2d IF DON'T KNOW OR REFUSED IN Q.FR2c You indicated in your response to a previous question that if the Business Energy Rebates Program had not been available there was an [FR2c] in 10 likelihood that you would have ins...

AI summary The text includes questions from a regulatory proceeding related to the Business Energy Rebates Program, asking respondents about the timing of equipment installation without the rebate and whether they would have paid for energy-efficient measures without the rebate.

- S5. Now, using the same 10 point scale, how satisfied are you with Efficiency Nova Scotia's overall performance in working with your business? Satisfaction with Overall 2012 2013 2014 Satisfaction with Overall Performance Sample Size Sat...

AI summary The text presents survey results measuring satisfaction with Efficiency Nova Scotia's performance in working with businesses, including aspects like responsiveness, technical expertise, and the value of the Business Energy Rebates program. The data shows consistently high satisfaction levels across multiple years.

Sampling Methodology A total of 70 on-site visits were conducted to evaluate BER Mail-In15. The sampling plan was developed on the basis of the September 2014 tracking sheet, which included all projects to date. The tracking sheet containe...

AI summary A sampling methodology involving 70 on-site visits was used to evaluate BER Mail-In15. The plan was based on a September 2014 tracking sheet containing 246 projects, 196 of which were completed. The tracking sheet was used to determine the percentage of tracked savings by measure category.

CFM, Size, Control Info) Date of installation: Compressed Air Products Installed Cycling refrigerated air dryer – Number installed: Verify <300 cfm capacity Is the equipment still used? If not, why and since when? Compressor operation [hr/...

AI summary The document contains a table with questions regarding the installation, usage, and operational details of various compressed air products, including cycling refrigerated air dryers, VSD screw compressors, air-entraining air nozzles, and no-loss drains. It seeks information on equipment status, capacity, usage hours, and system pressure.

FR2a. If your company had not participated in BER, what is the likelihood that you would have installed exactly the same energy-efficient equipment that you installed through the program? (Scale 0 to 10) IF Pre-FR3 = Yes: FR2a = (Answer x...

AI summary The text outlines a set of questions related to the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, assessing the likelihood of energy-efficient equipment installation without the program and the influence of program factors on decision-making. It also includes formulas for calculating scores based on responses.

Program Component Overview Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's (ENSC) Custom Retrofit provides business, non-profit and institutional (BNI) customers with technical assistance, financial incentives and project financing to help reduce the...

AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Custom Retrofit program provides technical and financial support to BNI customers to reduce electricity consumption and demand. The program includes EMIS, EBC, and New Construction components, with combined goals of 19.3 GWh electricity savings and 3.6 MW peak demand savings in 2014.

Evaluation Report The Evaluation Report tab contains the most information, and is similar in scope to the 2013 tracking sheet used by ENSC. Information contained in this tab includes: project ID, project status, ENSC project owner, partici...

AI summary The Evaluation Report provides detailed tracking of energy and peak demand savings, including project IDs, participant contact information, and incentive payments. However, it lacks line loss factors and Nova Scotia Power rate codes, making it difficult to calculate savings at the meter. The report also notes that adding facility contact information has improved on-site coordination and evaluation processes.

Adjustments to Other Custom Retrofit Projects The remaining Custom projects in the sample are classified as "other" Custom Retrofit projects for this report. The tracked savings for each project were adjusted using a similar methodology as...

AI summary The report discusses adjustments to energy and peak demand savings for 'other' Custom Retrofit projects, noting minor discrepancies in energy savings calculations and significant errors in documentation. An overall energy savings adjustment factor of 0.991 was applied, while a peak demand adjustment factor of 0.686 was used, influenced by differences in methods for estimating peak coincidence factors.

6.2.1 Validated Gross Savings As explained in previous sections, the Evaluator did not make adjustments to the gross savings value reported by ENSC. The tracked gross energy savings values reported by ENSC are summarized in the table below...

AI summary The Evaluator did not adjust the gross savings values reported by ENSC, as explained in previous sections. Tracked gross energy savings values are summarized in a table, with no demand savings claimed for either of the two components.

Verification and Recall [V Series] V1. The Custom program helps businesses implement electrical energy-saving projects. The Custom program offers technical assistance, financial incentives and financing to offset the cost of engineering st...

AI summary The text outlines a verification and recall process related to participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Custom Program, which provides technical assistance, financial incentives, and financing for energy-saving projects. It asks respondents to confirm participation and identify the most knowledgeable person about their experience with the program.

Parties Responsible for Specifying Measures 2012 (%) 2013 (%) 2014 (#) Sample Size 27 29 11 Outside design professional 15% 31% 4 Someone within the organization 30% 21% 3 Utility account manager 4% 3% 2 Contractor 33% 17% 1 Manufacturer r...

AI summary The document presents data on the parties responsible for specifying energy efficiency measures from 2012 to 2014, along with the importance of various factors influencing the implementation of energy efficiency measures through a program. The data includes percentages and sample sizes for different groups and ratings on a scale from 0 to 10 for the importance of factors such as financial incentives, technical assistance, and corporate policies.

B6. Approximately what percent of your annual operating budget do energy costs account for? Percent of Budget 2012 (#) 2013 (#) 2014 (#) Sample Size 15 19 5 Less than 10% 5 4 2 10-19% 2 6 2 20-29% 3 3 1 30-39% 2 2 - 40-49% 1 3 - 50-59% 2 1...

AI summary The text provides data on the percentage of annual operating budgets attributed to energy costs for different years (2012-2014) and the number of full-time equivalent workers employed by organizations in Nova Scotia. The data is presented in tabular format with sample sizes and percentages for each category.

APPENDIX VI CALCULATION EXAMPLE This appendix describes the step-by-step calculations that have produced the results for one of the projects in the 2014 Custom Retrofit impact evaluation. The algorithm described concerns the adjustments ma...

AI summary This appendix outlines a calculation example for a 2014 Custom Retrofit impact evaluation, focusing on adjustments made to a lighting project. It describes the equations used for savings calculations, the tracked savings claimed by ENSC, and the project-specific adjustment ratio established during the evaluation.

10. Energy and Demand Savings Adjustments Energy Savings from Tracking Sheet: #REF! ##### kWh/yr Project Estimated Finish Month: Demand Savings from Tracking Sheet: 0,0 kW #REF! Diversity Factor Used by ENSC: - Notes on Project Status: #RE...

AI summary This section discusses energy and demand savings adjustments, including tracking sheets, evaluator adjustments, and final project impacts at the meter. It includes notes on project status and diversity factors used by ENSC and Econoler.

Table 1: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 7.122 GWh 7.122 GWh 1.00 7.122 GWh Evaluation...

AI summary Table 1 compares tracked and evaluated energy and peak demand savings from ENSC and the Econoler team. Evaluated savings are 6.5% and 3.9% lower than tracked savings, mainly due to adjustments in one LEED project. ENSC included a diversity factor in peak demand calculations this year, reducing the need for large adjustments.

2014 Custom NC-R1. Gather more data to conduct a conclusive calibration billing analysis in 2015. Despite the fact that 23 projects were completed in 2012 and 2013, it was only possible to obtain sufficient energy billing data for seven pr...

AI summary The document discusses the need for more data to conduct a conclusive calibration billing analysis, the adoption of the NECB 2011 as a baseline for new projects, and the explanation of diversity factor values used in peak demand savings calculations. Issues with data sufficiency and the need for improved evaluation practices are highlighted.

Measures by Project The Measures by Project tab in the tracking report includes the project ID, project name, status, categories of measure/codes and description, as well as the verified energy and peak demand savings at the generator. Thi...

AI summary The Measures by Project tab in the tracking report includes project details, energy efficiency measures, and verified savings. It addresses 2013 recommendations by providing more information on implemented measures and adding diversity factors and savings values for better evaluation and on-site verification.

4.1.2 Billing Calibration with Past Participants As part of this year's impact evaluation, seven past participants of Custom NC were selected to validate the accuracy of the building energy simulations against actual billing data. The buil...

AI summary This section discusses the validation of building energy simulations against actual billing data for seven past participants in the Custom NC program. The evaluation used regression analysis and compared results to ASHRAE and IPMVP guidelines to assess the accuracy of energy consumption predictions.

This Appendix presents all recommendations made by the Evaluator throughout the report as well as the sections from which the recommendations originated. Sections Recommendations Executive Summary 1 Gather more data to conduct a conclusive...

AI summary The Evaluator recommends gathering more data to conduct a conclusive calibration billing analysis in 2015. In 2014, only seven out of 23 completed projects had sufficient energy billing data, leading to inconclusive results. The Evaluator suggests continuing this evaluation and implementing measures like requiring final energy simulation submissions and enhanced building commissioning.

done by the third-party contractor. Survey results showed that participants encountered issues with third-party contractors and the quality of their work. ENSC already requires that the DAs follow up with customers after installation to en...

AI summary The text discusses issues with third-party contractors and the quality of work in energy efficiency programs. It highlights the need for ENSC to conduct follow-up calls and include a lighting intensity analysis in on-site assessments to improve participant satisfaction and ensure proper implementation of energy efficiency measures.

Non-lighting Measures Tracking Report As for the other data captured in the non-lighting measures tracking report, the contact information has been entered for all the participants. The heating load hours have been set at 2,200 hours for a...

AI summary The Non-lighting Measures Tracking Report includes participant contact details, project information, and details about non-lighting measures such as heat pumps. The report lacks information on cooling systems, which limits accurate savings calculations. The Evaluator recommends adding cooling system data and developing a validation process for savings calculations.

Unitary Savings for LED Lamp and Ballast Replacements For measures that involve replacing the lamps and the ballast, savings presented in the tracking report are based on existing measures related to decommissioned equipment wattage and pr...

AI summary The document outlines the method for calculating energy savings from replacing LED lamps and ballasts. It emphasizes the use of ballast efficacy factors for accuracy and recommends alternative calculations if this data is unavailable. The approach differs from relamping measures due to the complexity of ballast replacements.

Where: - › Capacity: This is the nominal heating capacity of the heat pump (kBTU/hr). - › Heating Seasonal Performance Factor (HSPF): For the old equipment, the HSPF is estimated at 3.412, based on the assumption that electric baseboard he...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings for heat pumps using parameters such as capacity, HSPF, and full load hours. It references the 2014 BER CIRx Screening Tool and the Efficiency Vermont TRM, while noting a discrepancy between ENSC's use of 2,200 hours and a recommended 2,750 hours based on industry standards.

Revised Savings The Evaluator conducted six on-site visits for this year's evaluation. Adjustments were made to four of the six visits. The adjustments were due to the following reasons: 6 Efficiency Vermont, "Technical Reference User Manu...

AI summary The Evaluator made adjustments to six on-site visits, resulting in changes to gross energy and peak demand savings. Cooling savings were applied to two projects based on heat pump replacements, and the SEER calculation was used to determine annual energy savings.

5.3.1 Revised Gross Savings for BES Lighting Measures As presented in section 5.1.1, the Evaluator revised the gross energy and peak demand savings of BES lighting measures calculated in the final tracking system based on the adjustments m...

AI summary The document discusses the revised gross energy and peak demand savings for BES lighting measures, highlighting adjustments due to calculation errors, self-declaration ratios, installation rates, and diversity factors. Line loss factors were applied to account for electricity losses, and total savings are estimated at 13.058 GWh and 2.331 MW at the meter, and 13.972 GWh and 2.495 MW at the generator.

5.3.2 Revised Gross Savings for BES Non-lighting Measures The Evaluator revised the gross energy and peak demand savings calculated for the BES non-lighting measures (section 5.1.2) based on the adjustments made to the following: - › Adjus...

AI summary The Evaluator revised the gross energy and peak demand savings for BES non-lighting measures based on adjustments to heat pump and pipe insulation ratios, installation rates, and diversity factors. A line loss factor of 1.084 was applied to account for electricity losses between the meter and the generator, with Nova Scotia Power providing the line loss factors for each rate code.

Table 17: Evaluation of Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings Associated with BES Non-lighting Measures Category of Product Heat Pumps Hot Water Tank Wraps Pipe Insulation Vending Machine Misers Hot Water Heat Pumps Total Tracked Energy Sav...

AI summary Table 17 evaluates the gross energy and peak demand savings from non-lighting measures under the Building Efficiency Program (BES). It includes energy savings from heat pumps, hot water tank wraps, pipe insulation, vending machine misers, and hot water heat pumps, with metrics like tracked energy savings, installation rates, and unitary savings values.

5.3.3 Revised Gross Savings for RP&C Common Areas The annual gross savings for each type of product installed in RP&C Common Areas are presented in in [Table 18.](#page-120-0) They were calculated using the unitary savings values presented...

AI summary This section discusses the revised gross savings for RP&C Common Areas, calculated using unitary savings values. The total gross energy and peak demand savings at the meter are 0.425 GWh and 0.052 MW, respectively. Adjusted for line loss, the generator-level savings are 0.467 GWh and 0.057 MW.

Table 19: Evaluation of Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings Associated with RP&C Common Areas Measures (Other Products) Category of Product 12-Watt BR30 7-Watt MR16 LED Exit Lights Low-flow Faucet Aerator Low-flow Showerhe ad Low-flow Sho...

AI summary Table 19 presents an evaluation of gross energy and peak demand savings associated with RP&C common areas measures for various products, including LED lights, low-flow faucets, and pipe insulation. The table details the number of units installed, energy savings, and peak demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.

Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. Efficiency Nova Scotia Financial Assistance Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused b. Information received during the initial contact by the program representative. Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused c. E...

AI summary The text presents a series of factors related to Efficiency Nova Scotia financial assistance and industry practices, with responses indicating a lack of knowledge or refusal to answer. It includes questions about program representation, initial assessments, material recycling, and industry standards.

2.3.2 Secondary Data Search This evaluation made extensive use of market data provided by industry associations, particularly Electro-Federation Canada (EFC) and the Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Institute of Canada (HRAI). T...

AI summary The evaluation used market data from industry associations like EFC and HRAI to estimate market sizes in Nova Scotia. Shipments were analyzed by province and region, with Nova Scotia's share estimated at 39.6% of Atlantic Canada's total. Statistics Canada data was used to improve accuracy, particularly for electric motors, standby power, and external power supplies.

3.3.1 Market Size Estimate Since the initial 2008 report by Navigant Consulting26, EFC has been tracking three-phase dry-type transformer sales according to three power size classes. Their membership represents an estimated 85%-89% of the...

AI summary The market size estimate for three-phase dry-type transformers in Nova Scotia is based on EFC's tracking of sales data, which covers 85%-89% of the market. Sales are tracked in dollars, with average prices applied to estimate shipments, and demographic weights are used to estimate Nova Scotia's share within the region.

The Econoler team estimates that 0.003 MW was saved at the meter in Nova Scotia in 2014 as a result of introducing the regulation on large air conditioners and heat pumps. A diversity factor of 0 percent was applied to air conditioners sin...

AI summary The Econoler team estimated that 0.003 MW was saved in Nova Scotia in 2014 due to regulations on large air conditioners and heat pumps. A 0% diversity factor was applied to air conditioners, while a 98% diversity factor was applied to heat pumps, based on the 2014 BER evaluation report.

3.7.3 Unitary Savings Values In Amendment 11, NRCan has provided unitary savings values for integrated stereos, portable audio products, television, non-recording video players and recording video players. It has also estimated average uni...

AI summary Amendment 11 provides unitary savings values for various electronic products, including integrated stereos, portable audio products, and video players. Ecos did not provide specific market size data for clock radios, so they were grouped under 'integrated stereo.' The Econoler team followed a similar approach in their study.

3.8.1 Market Size Estimate In 2012, Ecos performed a market analysis of external power supplies. Based on data from 2008, the Ecos report estimated shipments by power supply class to Canada and indicated the dominant consumer product in ea...

AI summary A 2012 market analysis by Ecos estimated shipments of external power supplies in Canada, with Statistics Canada's Survey of Household Spending used to track expenditures and determine Nova Scotia's share of national sales.

3.9.4 Portion of the Market Impacted by the Regulation ICF analysis of baseline performance was based on product availability and assumed purchasing and utilization levels on a household or commercial establishment basis. The full analysis...

AI summary The ICF analysis estimated energy savings from lighting standards, but amendments in 12B reduced projected savings. The original 2008 standard aimed for a 30% efficiency increase, while the amended standard allows for slightly less efficient bulbs, resulting in at least 28% energy savings compared to traditional incandescent bulbs. The analysis assumes average household usage and product availability.

Table 48: Energy Savings Associated with the Introduction of Incandescent Bulbs Standards in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Total Incremental Energy Savings at Meter for 2014 (GWh) Incandescent bulbs (75 - 100W) 16.528 The Evaluator...

AI summary Table 48 shows energy savings from incandescent bulb standards in Nova Scotia, with 16.528 GWh saved in 2014. The Evaluator confirmed no overlap with the Instant Savings program, which replaced incandescent bulbs with CFLs. The analysis indicated that CFLs sold through Instant Savings had lower wattage than the incandescent bulbs they replaced.

3.10.4 Portion of the Market Impacted by the Regulation In its report, DMD & Associates Ltd. estimated that total street lighting consumption in 2009 was 88,886,988 kWh. This would work out to an average consumption per light unit of 653.8...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of regulations on street lighting energy consumption in Nova Scotia, referencing data from DMD & Associates Ltd. and Nova Scotia Power. It notes that energy savings estimates are hindered by incomplete data on replaced units and varying efficiency levels.

Table 52: Energy Savings Associated with the Introduction of the LED Street Lightings in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Number of Lighting Annual Energy Total Incremental Energy Units Replaced Savings Savings at Meter for 2014 in 201...

AI summary Table 52 presents energy savings from the introduction of LED street lighting in Nova Scotia, showing 12,052 units replaced in 2014 with annual energy savings of 2.758 GWh. Section 3.10.7 discusses at-meter peak demand savings associated with this transition.

Billing Analysis Opower estimated the savings using a panel data regression model, which involved following and comparing the same individuals over time, as well as comparing different individuals at a given point in time through regressio...

AI summary Opower used a panel data regression model to estimate savings from energy efficiency programs, while Econoler validated these estimates using a simple regression model. Both methods showed no significant statistical differences, supporting the accuracy of Opower's approach.

Econoler then applied the line loss factor determined total net savings at the generator as 34.498 (GWh) with 9.162 GWh of that in 2013 and 25.336 GWh in 2014.[31](#page-43-3) Opower did not compute a demand reduction; however, Econoler in...

AI summary Econoler calculated energy savings and demand reductions for a DSM program, but the evaluation was conducted by the program vendor, raising concerns about independence and integrity. The report highlights a conflict of interest and questions the methodology used, as no explanation was provided for combining datasets or lack of independent evaluation.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 2 b) The media strategy is developed using research to identify target audiences and 3 understand their media consumption habits. ENS is not able to provide the specific 4 studies as they are subscription-based. Sources...

AI summary The text outlines ENS's media strategy, emphasizing research-driven audience targeting and the dominance of television in influencing Atlantic Canadians. Television is prioritized due to high recall and time spent, with annual budgets adjusted based on program performance relative to energy savings targets. Three criteria guide media weight allocation: sector appropriateness, marketing goals, and reach consistency.

Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-2 Page 4 of 7 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary The document references E1's (EfficiencyOne) responses to NSPI's (Nova Scotia Power Inc.) information requests regarding a 2016-2018 supply agreement under the Energy Efficiency Conservation Agreement (EECA), identified as matter M06733. It pertains to regulatory proceedings involving energy efficiency program management.

S-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Figure 1 - 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings Incremental Incremental Annual Net Annual Net Program Ratepayer Impact Investment Lifetime Benefits Total Re...

AI summary The figure presents data on investment and savings for the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, including metrics like annual net energy savings, demand savings, and cost tests (TRC and PAC). It highlights the financial and energy efficiency aspects of the program.

at Generator at Generator Cost Test (PAC)c (RIM)d (GWh) (MW) 2016 38.5 127.3 133.1 20.4 1.9 3.6 0.5 2017 40.3 139.8 136.5 21.0 2.0 3.8 0.5 2018 42.6 150.5 136.3 21.0 2.1 3.9 0.5 Total 121.5 417.5 405.9 62.5 2.0 3.8 0.5 Currency is expresse...

AI summary The text presents data on demand-side management (DSM) resource plan investments and savings from 2016 to 2018, including metrics like RIM and PAC. Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC’s DSM Potential Study, are highlighted as including energy and capacity costs. Terms like TRC, PAC, and RIM are defined as benefit/cost ratios.

at Generator at Generator Cost Test (PAC)c (RIM)d (GWh) (MW) Residential DSM Programs Efficient Product Rebates 2.5 6.6 11.0 1.1 1.6 2.7 0.4 Existing Residential 12.0 50.9 41.0 7.5 1.8 4.3 0.5 Low Income Participation e 2.0 7.8 1.0 New Res...

AI summary The table presents metrics for residential and business energy efficiency programs, including Program Assessment Cost (PAC), Resource Investment Metric (RIM), and output in GWh and MW. It details participation rates, costs, and program-specific data across categories like rebates, direct installation, and enabling strategies.

Other Enabling Strategies 0.6 Total 38.5 127.3 133.1 20.4 1.9 3.6 0.5 Currency is expressed in 2016 dollars. Columns may not add correctly, due to rounding. Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC’s DSM Potential Study at the Base Leve...

AI summary The text discusses avoided costs from ENSC's DSM Potential Study, including energy and capacity costs, and defines TRC, PAC, and RIM as benefit/cost ratios. It references the 2015 DSM Resource Plan Settlement Agreement and a 2016-2018 EECA supply agreement. Metrics include lifetime net present value of benefits and participation by low-income customers.

at Generator at Generator Cost Test (PAC)c (RIM)d (GWh) (MW) Residential DSM Programs Efficient Product Rebates 2.7 7.3 12.0 1.1 1.7 2.8 0.4 Existing Residential 13.6 58.3 44.2 8.0 1.9 4.3 0.5 Low Income Participation e 2.3 8.2 1.1 New Res...

AI summary The table presents cost and performance metrics for Nova Scotia's demand-side management (DSM) programs, including residential and business initiatives. It details program expenditures, energy savings (GWh), capacity (MW), and associated metrics like Program Assessment Cost (PAC) and Resource Investment Metric (RIM). Totals for program categories and enabling strategies are summarized.

at Generator at Generator Cost Test (PAC)c (RIM)d (GWh) (MW) Residential DSM Programs Efficient Product Rebates 2.7 7.9 12.2 1.1 1.8 2.9 0.4 Existing Residential 14.8 61.8 43.6 8.0 1.9 4.2 0.5 Low Income Participation e 2.6 7.7 1.0 New Res...

AI summary The document presents a table detailing metrics for various demand-side management (DSM) programs, including cost tests, resource investment metrics, and energy output figures. It categorizes programs into residential, business, nonprofit, and institutional segments, with data on participation, costs, and performance indicators.

Other Enabling Strategies 0.9 3 Total 42.6 150.5 136.3 21.0 2.1 3.9 0.5 Currency is expressed in 2016 dollars. Columns may not add correctly, due to rounding. Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC’s DSM Potential Study at the Base Le...

AI summary The text outlines avoided costs, TRC, PAC, and RIM metrics for energy efficiency programs, referencing ENS's 2015 DSM Resource Plan Settlement Agreement and NSPI's data. It includes a 2016-2018 EECA supply agreement and E1's responses to NSPI information requests.

nent: Column V 28 29 b) Please refer to Attachment 1. Measure counts are outputs from 2016-2018 DSM 30 Resource Plan modelling; they are not “anticipated” counts of measure uptake. ENS Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-9 Page 1 of 2...

AI summary The text discusses the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan modelling, noting that measure counts are outputs from the model and not anticipated uptake. It also provides data on daylighting controls as part of the Efficient Product Rebates (BNI) program.

Rebates (BNI) 48,468 jurisdictions supporting these products as a standard offering. ENS is one such jurisdiction. This measure serves to augment other energy efficiency measures LED Refrigeration Strip Lighting- offered for grocers. Groce...

AI summary The text discusses rebate programs for energy-efficient products, including LED refrigeration strip lighting for grocers and ground source heat pumps. It highlights the challenges of high installation costs and the potential for cost reduction through increased competition and promotion by ENS.

l) 24,990 is expected that TRC ratios will improve due to greater distribution of fixed costs such as marketing and signage. This product broadens Efficient Products offerings for consumers. As more of these products are purchased by Insta...

AI summary The document includes references to a 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan and responses to information requests by EfficiencyOne related to the plan. It also mentions the inclusion of a new column in a spreadsheet to address specific requests regarding the TRC ratios and fixed costs.

Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-11 Page 6 of 7 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 principles. This need not imply equal weighting of each goal, but explic...

AI summary This document contains responses from E1 to NSPI information requests related to the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA, filed under matter number M06733. It includes principles discussed in Appendix F, page 1.

ed. 27 28 (f) Please indicate if E1 considered equity between participants and non-participants in 29 the development of its recommended portfolio. If “yes”, please provide a detailed Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-12 Page 1 of 9...

AI summary The document requests E1 to indicate whether equity between participants and non-participants was considered in the development of its recommended portfolio. It references a 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter number M06733.

Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-12 Page 1 of 9 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 description of how equity between participants and non-participants...

AI summary The document outlines a request for information regarding the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for the Energy Efficiency Conservation Agreement (EECA M06733). It includes detailed queries about program eligibility, participation forecasts, cost ratios, incentive structures, and implementation budgets.

t-to-gross ratio; 28 29 (viii) A breakdown of the program implementation budget by year, separately 30 identifying incentive and non-incentive costs. Provide any supporting Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-12 Page 2 of 9 2016-2018 S...

AI summary The text outlines information requests related to program implementation budgets and analysis for a 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733. It specifically requests a breakdown of incentive and non-incentive costs, as well as methodology for estimating participation rates.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 a lower investment level, ENS removed the program from the Plan, as, based on a one- 2 year measure life, it has the highest lifetime unit cost in ENS’s portfolio. Removing this 3 program did not affect local industry ca...

AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) removed a program from its DSM Plan due to high lifetime unit costs and lack of data on assumptions for demand response measures. ENS also removed demand response from consideration due to its inability to provide energy savings or avoid capacity costs during the Plan period. Future research and pilot programs are expected.

Base Low Mid High Program MWh MW $M MWh MW $M MWh MW $M MWh MW $M Efficient Products 61,957 9.0 17.8 18,036 1.9 7.7 72,891 10.4 18.6 76,859 11.0 19.6 Existing Homes 68,840 25.2 37.3 60,396 23.3 28.5 91,261 34.5 50.7 130,329 54.6 152.3 Ener...

AI summary The table presents program performance metrics across different scenarios (Base, Low, Mid, High) with data on energy savings in MWh, capacity in MW, and costs in $M for various energy efficiency programs. The data highlights the impact of different program levels on energy savings, capacity, and financial costs.

Base Low Mid High Measure MWh MW $M MWh MW $M MWh MW $M MWh MW $M DHW Tank Wrap 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 Programmable Electronic Thermostat (Baseboard) 2,835 0.3 0.7 16 0.0 0.0 3,091 0.3 0.6 3,134 0.4 0.6 Outdoor Clothes lin...

AI summary The table presents energy efficiency program data across different measures and scenarios (Base, Low, Mid, High), including metrics such as MWh, MW, and $M. It lists various energy-efficient products and their associated energy usage and costs for each scenario.

approach is also not 29 consistent with DSM portfolio design principles and considerations, as outlined by 30 Dunsky Energy Consulting in Appendix F of EfficiencyOne’s Application. Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-14 Page 1 of 2 201...

AI summary The document discusses E1's response to NSPI's information request regarding performance targets for the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA. E1 explains that it does not include a performance target for total spending or unit cost ($/kWh) due to the lack of recourse for additional revenue in case of over-expenditure.

Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-15 Page 1 of 1 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-16: 2 3 Reference: EfficiencyOne, Evidence - Page 51, Section...

AI summary E1 responds to NSPI's information request regarding the incorporation of ITCs into the 2016–2018 budget, revisions to figures if ITCs differ from budgeted results, and processes for crediting customers if ITCs are claimed. E1 confirms that ITCs have been incorporated into the budget.

-0.000000137 12/31 24:00:00 0.000021918 0.000021781 -0.000000137 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary This document contains a portion of a regulatory proceeding related to an energy efficiency agreement and responses to information requests from NSPI. It includes a supply agreement and some numerical data.

ate Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-19 Page 1 of 3 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary This document pertains to the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter number M06733 (E-ENS-R-15), and includes responses from E1 to information requests by NSPI.

27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-19 Page 2 of 3 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary This document references a 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter number M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) and includes E1 responses to NSPI Information Requests.

Attachment 1, filed electronically, for measure-level energy-savings details, found in column E. Investment dollars are a sum of measure-level investment in the EL- RAM. Please refer to EfficiencyOne's response to NSPI IR-10 Investment ($M...

AI summary The document includes an attachment with investment details related to energy-saving measures and references a 2016-2018 supply agreement for EECA M06733. It also mentions responses to information requests by NSPI.

Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-23 Page 1 of 1 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary This document is a response by E1 to information requests from NSPI regarding the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA, filed under matter number M06733.

0.0 Other Enabling Strategies 0.3 0.0 0.0 Enabling Strategies Subtotal 3.5 0.0 0.0 Total 39.0 121.2 21.2 a Currency is expressed in 2015 dollars. Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-24 Page 1 of 1 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M0...

AI summary The document references a 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter number M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) and includes responses to NSPI Information Requests. It also contains financial data in 2015 dollars.

Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-25 Page 1 of 2 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL Investment 2016-2018 Total ($ million)a Residential DSM Programs Effi...

AI summary The document outlines the investment amounts allocated to various energy efficiency programs by EECA from 2016 to 2018, including residential and business programs, with a total investment of $121.5 million.

trategies 2.2 Total 121.5 a Program totals may not add due to rounding Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-25 Page 2 of 2 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary The document references a 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) and includes responses from E1 to information requests by NSPI. The context involves regulatory proceedings and energy efficiency programs.

March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-25 Page 2 of 2 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-26: 2 3 Reference: EfficiencyOne, Evidence - Page 33, Lines 23-24: 4...

AI summary E1 argues that reducing program capacity now may not be cost-effective if it leads to future rebuilding. E1 refers to its Application Evidence for analysis and discusses a reduced investment plan to address affordability while preserving industry capacity. No further mitigation measures were considered beyond the proposed plan.

Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-26 Page 1 of 1 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary This document is a response from E1 to information requests by NSPI regarding the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA, filed under matter number M06733.

Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-30 Page 2 of 2 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary This document, filed on March 27, 2015, includes E1's responses to NSPI information requests related to the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA, matter number M06733 (E-ENS-R-15).

n a 26 decrease in unit cost for the program of $0.18 per kWh. Energy savings for the 2016- 27 2018 period for this program increased by 33.3 GWh. 28 • BNI programs were prioritized in plan development via changes in assumptions relating 2...

AI summary The text discusses a decrease in unit cost for a program by $0.18 per kWh and an increase in energy savings for the 2016-2018 period. BNI programs were prioritized in plan development, leading to an increase in BNI energy savings as a percentage of total energy savings from 50 percent to 57 percent.

Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-34 Page 1 of 2 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary This document outlines E1's responses to NSPI's information requests regarding the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA, referenced in matter M06733 (E-ENS-R-15).

that these coming changes were fully accounted for in ENSC’s DSM 21 potential study, i.e. the potential and associated costs are net of anticipated new 22 standards. Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-34 Page 2 of 2 2016-2018 Supply A...

AI summary The text references a demand-side management (DSM) potential study by ENSC, which accounts for new standards and their associated costs. It also includes a table related to program spending, energy savings, and demand reductions under a supply agreement for EECA, with notes on currency and verification status.

: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-35 Page 1 of 2 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 2 3 Notes: 4 Per Balance Adjustment filings. 5 2014 energy savings and demand...

AI summary This document outlines E1's responses to NSPI's information requests regarding the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA, referencing a matter number (M06733) and including notes about energy savings, spending estimates, and currency in 2016 dollars.

e Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-36 Page 1 of 4 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary This document pertains to E1's responses to information requests from NSPI under the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA, referenced in matter M06733 (E-ENS-R-15).

hich cumulative lifetime energy 29 savings are a critical input. As a result, half of our 10 case studies use cumulative lifetime 30 energy savings either implicitly or explicitly in their Performance targets. Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1...

AI summary The document discusses the importance of cumulative lifetime energy savings in performance targets, noting that half of 10 case studies use this metric. It references a 2016-2018 supply agreement for EECA and E1 responses to NSPI information requests.

iled: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-36 Page 2 of 4 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary The document references a 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter number M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) and includes E1 responses to NSPI Information Requests. It appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding involving energy efficiency programs and agreements.

Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-36 Page 3 of 4 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary This document, filed on March 27, 2015, contains E1's responses to NSPI information requests related to the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter number M06733 (E-ENS-R-15).

.6% 86.6 88 86 1 1 2015 59.2 70.1% 84.5 85 84 1 0 Budgeted 13 The table above does not include EfficiencyOne’s On-Site Energy Managers (OEMs), as these 14 positions are not included in compensation expenses. The cost of OEMs is covered thr...

AI summary The text discusses the exclusion of EfficiencyOne’s On-Site Energy Managers (OEMs) from compensation expenses, as their costs are covered through incentives and reimbursements. It also references a 2016-2018 supply agreement for EECA and E1 responses to NSPI information requests.

d: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-37 Page 1 of 1 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary The document refers to a 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter number M06733 (E-ENS-R-15), and includes E1 responses to NSPI information requests. It is related to energy efficiency programs and regulatory processes.

Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-39 Page 1 of 1 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary This document outlines E1's responses to information requests from Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) regarding the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for the Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (EECA), referenced in matter M06733.

Mar ket Increases & other ctJ 0 ....Q) ecommendations From EL aJ 0 o<S .... VI Qj tlO .... VI .... ctJVI M eet W it h Employees One- On- ~ Qj 0 c: One To Deliv er Results Of -o t ctJ Process Ends ctJ Qj Compensat ion Review And ~ ~ .... .....

AI summary The document references a 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter number M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) and mentions responses to information requests from NSPI. It also includes a heading related to market increases and recommendations from the ELT.

0 230 Brownlow Avenue I Suite 300 I Dartmouth, NS I B3B OGS 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-43: 2 3 Please provide copies of all studies, docum...

AI summary The document outlines responses to information requests regarding compensation benchmarks for ENS and E1 from 2011 to the present. Attachments 1 and 2 are referenced as confidential, and E1 and ENSC state they have not conducted benchmarking for overall labour costs.

1 is filed Confidentially and must be accessed through the UARB Confidential 2 Repository. 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests CONFIDENTIAL (Attachment 2) 1 Attachment 2 is file...

AI summary The document references a confidential supply agreement between NSPI and EECA, identified as M06733 (E-ENS-R-15), and includes responses to information requests from NSPI. The attachment is marked as confidential and requires access through the UARB Confidential Repository.

5.7 2014 Actual 801 1 802 5.9 2015 Budget 790 1 791 5.6 Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-44 Page 1 of 1 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-...

AI summary The document provides a response to an information request regarding employee benefits for EfficiencyOne, noting that the company matches employee contributions for benefits such as medical, dental, and life insurance.

1 E1 (NSPI) IR-14, March 27, 2015, page 1, lines 3-6. E1 (NSPI) IR-26(b), March 27, 2015, page 1, lines 26-28. the creation of a "reserve fund" financed by NS Power customers with 50 percent of any surplus balance being placed in a reserve...

AI summary NS Power requests E1 to redesign its DSM plan with a more appropriate portfolio of programs and spending level, suggesting a funding level of approximately $22 million per year over the Contract Period to achieve energy savings of about 100 GWh annually and avoid adding generation capacity until 2032.

es to the programs."6 25 26 27 NS Power supports DSM that will help provide stable, predictable and affordable 28 electricity prices for Nova Scotians. NS Power does not support the plan proposed by 5 References to "Demand Side Management"...

AI summary NS Power supports a Demand Side Management (DSM) plan that provides stable and affordable electricity prices. They recommend a DSM expenditure of approximately $22 million per year, which aligns with the 'Low Case DSM' from Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2014 study and would allow NS Power to avoid adding new generation capacity until 2032.

7 Navigant, 2014 IRP, Nova Scotia 2015 ‐ 2040 Demand Side Management (DSM) Potential Study , Presented to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, NSUARB M05522/P-884.14, January 7, 2014. 1 period, customer impacts can be mitigated by implement...

AI summary NS Power is seeking approval for a Supply Agreement for the provision of Energy Efficiency Conservation Agreements (EECAs) and emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability from E1, now a regulated public utility, in justifying its DSM Plan. The Act requires that the Board ensure the agreement is in the best interests of customers.

4 The CRP analysis process used in the 2014 IRP did not offer full optimization 5 opportunities but was rather an approach to test a range of DSM scenarios. The detailed 6 analysis undertaken through this proceeding provides a critical ste...

AI summary The text discusses the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan's CRP analysis process and its limitations, emphasizing the need for a more optimized approach. NS Power recommends moderate DSM investment, targeting 100 GWh/year in energy savings and associated demand savings, to avoid additional generation capacity until 2032. Demand-response DSM programs are suggested for future consideration based on cost and economics.

7 NS Power acknowledges that there could be enhancements to this approach that would 8 benefit from further modeling and input from E1, especially if program costs can be 9 achieved at similar levels to 2014 actuals, as opposed to the high...

AI summary NS Power suggests that a $22 million DSM plan over the Contract Period would be more affordable than E1's plan and deliver significant long-term benefits. It recommends E1 design such a plan with savings of approximately 100 GWh per year and present it for consideration. NS Power also references David Pickles' testimony for alternate assumptions and modeling.

51 EfficiencyOne Evidence, February 27, 2015, Appendix D, page 2. 1 9.0 RESERVE FUND 30 likely these can be addressed through the established regulatory process. 31 1 In summary, NS Power submits that the protections afforded E1 under its...

AI summary NS Power argues that the protections provided to EfficiencyOne (E1) under its franchise and through the implementation of the Energy Efficiency Conservation Agreement (EECA) are sufficient to address potential risks without requiring additional insulation from market challenges. NS Power also recommends that the Board reject E1's application to establish a reserve fund.

DATE FILED: April 10, 2015 Page 48 of 51 1 11.0 ICFI EVIDENCE 2 3 To assist in its analysis of the E1 DSM Plan, NS Power engaged ICFI to carry out a 4 separate review and provide testimony. Attached hereto as Appendix A is a copy of the 5...

AI summary NS Power argues that the proposed E1 DSM Plan is not cost-effective or affordable for Nova Scotians. While recognizing the long-term benefits of DSM, NS Power suggests a reduced investment level during the Contract Period, estimating annual spending of approximately $22 million would achieve energy savings of 100 GWh per year and avoid the need for additional generation capacity until 2032.

5 As shown in these tables, the EfficiencyOne residential portfolio ranks 7th out of eight portfolios, and the non-residential portfolio ranks 5th 6 . 7 Table 3 provides the individual residential program costs in $/kWh 8 for 39 residentia...

AI summary The text discusses the ranking of EfficiencyOne's residential and non-residential portfolios, with the residential portfolio ranking 7th out of eight and the non-residential portfolio ranking 5th. It also references tables that provide program costs in \/kWh for residential and non-residential programs in 2013, including EfficiencyOne's proposed costs for 2016-2018.

1 Table 4. Non-Residential DSM Program Cost Benchmarks Rank State/ Province Program Administrator Data Type Program Name Year 2016 CAD/ kWh 1 BC BC Hydro Actual C&I Distribution Rate Structures 2013 $0.00 2 MB Manitoba Hydro Actual Bioener...

AI summary Table 4 presents non-residential DSM program cost benchmarks from various provinces, including Nova Scotia's EfficiencyOne programs, highlighting cost per kWh for different initiatives from 2013 to 2018.

1 Q. COULD YOU PLEASE ILLUSTRATE THE CONSIDERATION OF 2 ALTERNATE PROGRAM ASSUMPTIONS AND EXPENDITURE 3 LEVELS? 4 A. Yes. In order to illustrate the potential impact of considering alternate 5 policy and program assumptions, ICF and NSP de...

AI summary The witness explains that ICF and NSP developed alternate scenarios using EfficiencyOne's ELRAM model to assess the impact of different program assumptions, including the exclusion of non-cost-effective measures. The witness argues that including a large number of non-cost-effective measures is not justified.

1 Scenario B: Which is the same as Scenario A and produces similar 2 energy savings, with the exception that program 3 implementation costs are allowed to vary plus or minus 20% 4 relative to the EfficiencyOne assumptions. In addition 5 in...

AI summary Scenario B allows program implementation costs and incentive costs to vary within a +/-20% range relative to EfficiencyOne assumptions, with specific exceptions for solar and fridge/freezer recycling incentives. This leads to a range of participation rates and costs, from which the least expensive option is selected as the preferred portfolio.

The TRC benefit cost ratio also improves from 2.0 to 2.2. The impact of permitting reasonable variations in program costs and incentives (Scenario B) is to permit slightly lower energy savings and program costs relative to Scenario A. The...

AI summary The TRC benefit cost ratio improves from 2.0 to 2.2. Scenario B allows for slightly lower energy savings and program costs compared to Scenario A. Scenario C provides 279 GWh and 33.0 MW of savings at a cost of $65.4 million. The analysis relies on ELRAM's participation forecasting algorithms to predict customer response to different program offerings and incentive levels.

1 Table 7. Summary of Scenario C (Company's Alternate Scenario) Impacts Cumulative Cost ($Millions) Peak Demand (MW) Cumulative (GWh) TRC Ratio Program Name E1 Case C % Diff. E1 Case C % Diff. E1 Case C % Diff. E1 Case C % Diff. RES‐Applia...

AI summary Table 7 presents the impacts of Scenario C, the company's alternate scenario, on various programs and enabling strategies. It shows cumulative costs, peak demand, and cumulative energy usage for different program categories, highlighting significant differences in cost and demand reductions compared to the baseline (E1). The TRC ratio also shows an increase in some cases.

3 4 Finally, the impact of permitting lower levels of participation 5 (Scenario D) and selecting a least-cost portfolio that meets a 300 GWh 6 energy savings target is to permit spending of only $65.2M (54% of the 7 EfficiencyOne proposal)...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of permitting lower participation levels and selecting a least-cost portfolio to achieve a 300 GWh energy savings target, resulting in reduced spending to $65.2M (54% of the EfficiencyOne proposal) and achieving 74% of the proposed savings.

1 Table 8. Summary of Scenario D Impacts Cumulative Cost ($Millions) Peak Demand (MW) Cumulative (GWh) TRC Ratio Program Name E1 Case D % Diff. E1 Case D % Diff. E1 Case D % Diff. E1 Case D % Diff. Efficient Products (Res) $ 7.83 $ ‐ 4.47...

AI summary Table 8 summarizes the impacts of Scenario D on various programs, showing reductions in cumulative costs, peak demand, and energy consumption compared to the baseline (E1). The table highlights the percentage differences in cost, demand, and energy usage across different programs, with overall reductions of up to 51% in cumulative costs and 25% in energy consumption.

Exhibit 2: 2015 First Year Cost Comparison ($/kWh of Planned Savings)8,9, 10 A better representation of the cost per kWh would factor in the program administrator's discount rate and consider the average measure life of the various measure...

AI summary The exhibit compares the 2015 first-year costs per kWh of planned energy savings across different provinces. It notes that ENSC, BC Hydro, and Efficiency Maine use different metrics to calculate cost per kWh, with ENSC having some of the highest costs. The exhibit also includes weighted averages and upper and lower cost limits based on planned savings.

being offered, the policy and legislation in effect, the avoided cost and the conservation culture of the region. 15 This exhibit uses electricity sales from the most recent year reported. 16 DSM Plan for Efficiency New Brunswick presents...

AI summary This text discusses the allocation of DSM costs in Nova Scotia, highlighting that industrial customers, despite contributing significantly to sales, only account for a small portion of DSM program participation and cost recovery. It suggests that a combined BNI and industrial program may be influencing participation rates.

(DSM) Potential Study, January 7, 2014. Verification Review of Program Year 2013 Evaluation Results – Report for the Nova Scotia Utilities and Review Board. H. Gil Peach, John Mitchell, June 5, 2013. 30 ITC = Input Tax Credit In 2014, Effi...

AI summary In 2014, Efficiency Nova Scotia's DSM portfolio exceeded energy savings targets while spending significantly less than planned. However, there were notable variances across different programs, which could impact electric system planning depending on the constraints and measure life of the savings.

The ENSC portfolio ranks highest on the list of jurisdictions reviewed for DSM spend per capita and per customer and also appears to have the highest DSM expenditure relative to savings. Exhibit 15 shows the verified cost per kilowattͲhour...

AI summary The ENSC portfolio has the highest DSM spend per capita and per customer, with Exhibit 15 showing verified cost per kilowatt-hour of ENSC's programs over the past three years. More detailed cost effectiveness tests are required to evaluate individual measures and programs within the portfolio.

Appendix A DSM Program Implementer Profiles Efficiency Nova Scotia Business Structure Franchise DSM Funding Mechanism DSM Cost Recovery Rate, Rate Smoothing Adjustment Population Served Number of Customers Planned DSM Savings C, 31% 942,70...

AI summary This appendix outlines the DSM Program Implementer Profiles for Efficiency Nova Scotia, detailing its business structure, funding mechanisms, customer base, and DSM savings targets. It includes financial data such as planned and actual DSM costs, savings, and energy usage metrics.

42 Nova Scotia 2015 DSM Plan M06247 Decision BC Hydro Business Structure Crown Corporation DSM Funding Mechanism Deferred for future rate recovery Planned DSM Savings R, 16% I, 52% Population Served 4,631,302 Year DSM Started 1989, 200844...

AI summary The 2015 DSM Plan by BC Hydro outlines funding mechanisms, savings goals, and customer participation across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. It includes deferred rate recovery, savings targets, and various programs such as refrigerators buy-back, lighting incentives, and smart meter infrastructure.

51 Final Independent Report for the Saskatchewan Rate Review Panelon SaskPower's 2014Ͳ2016 Rate Plan, Forkast Consulting, 2014 Manitoba Hydro Business Structure Crown Corporation DSM Funding Mechanism Profits on export, rates targeted at c...

AI summary This document provides a summary of Manitoba Hydro's business structure, DSM funding mechanism, and energy efficiency programs. It includes data on customer numbers, DSM savings, utility sales, and DSM plan costs and savings. The document references a 2014 annual report and provides financial and operational metrics related to energy efficiency initiatives.

57 Manitoba Power 2013Ͳ2016 Power Smart Plan, OntarioͲIndependent Electricity System Operator (IESO) Business Structure "IESO works collaboratively with local distribution companies and other partners to deliver conservation programs throu...

AI summary The document outlines the Ontario Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) and its role in delivering conservation programs through a systems benefit charge. It details the IESO's business structure, DSM funding mechanisms, customer numbers, and energy efficiency programs. The 2015-2020 DSM plan is outlined with financial figures and savings targets.

69 Plan Gobal En Efficacity Energetique Budget 2015, http://publicsde.regieͲenergie.qc.ca/projets/282/DocPrj/RͲ3905Ͳ2014ͲBͲ 0038ͲDemandeͲPieceͲ2014_08_01.pdf, Accessed January 30, 2015 Efficiency New Brunswick Business Structure Crown Corp...

AI summary The document compares energy efficiency programs in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, focusing on the DSM funding mechanism, customer numbers, and efficiency targets. It highlights differences in program structures, funding, and performance metrics between the two regions.

MeasureLevel Results for Baseline E1 and Optimized Case D Scenarios Pro m T gra ype Sub ͲPro gra m Me asu re Mo del Bui ldin g T ype End Use Cat ego ry Sto ck T tme nt rea Dem and (kW ) Ene rgy (M Wh ) Tot l. Cos al I mp t ($ ) usin eba 1...

AI summary The document presents MeasureLevel results comparing baseline E1 and optimized Case D scenarios for energy efficiency programs, including demand-side management rebates and lighting controls in commercial office buildings. The data includes metrics such as demand (kW), energy (MWh), and total cost impact ($).

Sheet1 Unnamed: 0 Unnamed: 1 2016 Unnamed: 3 Unnamed: 4 Unnamed: 5 Unnamed: 6 Unnamed: 7 Unnamed: 8 Unnamed: 9 2017 Unnamed: 11 Unnamed: 12 Unnamed: 13 Unnamed: 14 Unnamed: 15 Unnamed: 16 Unnamed: 17 2018 Unnamed: 19 Unnamed: 20 Unnamed: 2...

AI summary The table presents financial data from 2016 to 2018, including total values and specific program expenditures such as Enabling Strategies, Education and Outreach, and Development and Research. These programs show varying levels of funding and associated percentages over the three-year period.

2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests 1 Request IR-6: 11 Please refer to revised Table 6 in EAC IR-7 Attachment 2. This table demonstrates that there 12 are lower cost alternatives than...

AI summary The document outlines responses from NSPI to information requests regarding the 2016-2018 DSM Plan. It references alternative cost scenarios and discusses spending commitments for low-income homeowners and renters, as well as evaluation plans for energy and demand savings.

15 New Customer Projects D061 New Customers - Residential ($) D062 New Customers - Commercial ($) D004 New Customer Upgrades ($) Total New Customer ($) Actual 11,736,732 3,974,611 4,675,924 20,387,267 2010 ACE Budget 11,386,814 5,050,104 5...

AI summary The table provides a comparison of actual and budgeted figures for new customer projects, including residential, commercial, and upgrades, from 2010 to 2015. It shows discrepancies between actual and budgeted amounts, indicating variations in spending over the years.

E1 Responses to NSPI Information Request (IR 35) Act ual Pro gra m Spe ndi ng inc lud ing ST Ful l H Act ual Pr ogr am Spe ndi wit h H ST ng Ad jus ted for IT Cs An l nua En erg y Sav ing s An l nua Dem and Red ion uct s Full HS T HS T a d...

AI summary This document provides a detailed table of actual program spending, energy savings, and demand savings from 2010 to 2018, including adjustments for HST and ITCs. The data reflects spending by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) for demand-side management (DSM) programs and their impact on energy efficiency and demand reduction.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-1: 2 3 What percent of resources for energy efficiency are coming from each end-user sector 4 (Residential, Commercial, Industrial) in 2013, 2014, and 2015? 5 6 Response IR-1: 7 8 2013: 9 10 As per the Balance...

AI summary The document provides data on the distribution of energy efficiency spending across residential, commercial, industrial, and other sectors for 2013, 2014, and 2015. In 2013, residential accounted for 58%, commercial for 32%, industrial for 8%, and other for 2%. For 2014, the percentages were 54%, 34%, and 9% respectively, based on a compliance filing.

Cost of Fuel Avoided for DSM Scenarios Avoided Fuel Cost ($000) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Natural Gas / Oil $ 1,651 $ 1,512 $ 3,180 Hydro $ - $ - $ - Renewables $ - $ - $ - COMFIT $ - $ - $ - Mar...

AI summary The document presents a table showing the avoided fuel costs for various DSM scenarios from 2016 to 2029. The table includes data on natural gas/oil, hydro, renewables, COMFIT, Maritime Link, and net imports, with the total avoided fuel cost increasing over the years.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 and other factors. Mr. Pickles believes that the comparisons presented in his testimony 2 are appropriate for the purposes they were used. Specifically – to compare the overall 3 portfolio costs of the proposed E1 plan t...

AI summary Mr. Pickles supports the use of comparisons between the proposed E1 plan's portfolio costs and achievements in other jurisdictions as a factor in determining whether further investigation and justification of E1 costs are needed.

Low DSM Preliminary Load and Resources 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2030 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 Firm Peak 1,963 1,986 2,000 2,020 2,041 2,066 2,077 2,097 2,118 2,147 2,159 2,251 2,345 2,364 2,383 2,403 2,422 DSM...

AI summary The document presents a table analyzing low DSM (Demand Side Management) preliminary load and resources over multiple years, showing trends in firm peak demand, DSM contributions, required and existing MWs, resource additions, and surplus/deficit MWs above RM (Required Margin). It also includes data on reserve margins and capacity additions.

2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to Multeese Information Requests 1 Request IR-12: 2 3 NSPI's alternate plan presented in Section 5.0, beginning on page 37, and in Attachment B, 4 splits the DSM expenditures (excluding Ena...

AI summary The document outlines responses from Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) to information requests regarding the 2016-2018 DSM Plan. NSPI discusses the distribution of DSM expenditures between residential and commercial sectors and addresses concerns about equity. It also references the need for annual DSM performance reporting and deliverables, and differentiates its position from E1's approach.

Ε G В F C Low DSM Plan Scenario D DSM Plan Scenario D DSM Plan Net Cost (-) or Avoided Cost Incremental Annual Cumulative Energy Savings Scenario D Net Savings (+) Energy Savings Energy Savings \ (B \ D) (E + F)of Energy DSM Investment $/M...

AI summary The document presents two scenarios (Scenario D and E1 DSM Plan) for the Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan, detailing annual net savings or costs, energy savings, and DSM investments from 2015 to 2031. The data highlights the financial implications and energy savings associated with each plan over time.

1 Request IR-5: 4 annual amount in a given year is not spent, then it is to be deducted from the amount owing 5 in the following years. 6 7 (a) Does NSPI anticipate that this reduced spending could restrict E1's ability to 8 achieve the 3-...

AI summary The document includes two requests (IR-5 and IR-13) related to E1's spending and its status as a regulated public utility. NSPI responds to IR-5 by stating that E1 has historically met its efficiency targets and that NSPI is not liable for E1's performance under the Public Utilities Act.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-21: 9 funds from being moved between program years without appropriate approvals. 10 11 (b) Please refer to Section 79B(3) of the Public Utilities Act. This section prohibits NS 12 Power from being the franchi...

AI summary The document discusses concerns raised by NS Power regarding the management of funds by E1 and ENS, particularly the lack of approvals for moving funds between program years and the potential for E1 to make significant changes without Board approval. NS Power also highlights a 2014 report where ENS did not communicate potential budget variances and surplus, raising concerns about transparency and performance measurement.

J(3), an application came before the Board. That section provides that "...the Board shall establish a final agreement between the parties on such reasonable terms as the Board considers appropriate". - [19] El filed a DSM Plan that called...

AI summary The Board received a DSM Plan from El with a spending target of $121.5 million over 2016-2018. NSPI proposed $22 million annually for energy savings. Two consensus agreements were presented, including a Quantum Agreement and a Consensus Agreement, signed by multiple stakeholders including El, NSPI, the CA, SBA, and others, outlining spending targets and equity considerations.

were applied as defined in the methodology. Also, in recommendation HER-R3, Econoler noted that past electricity consumption for the participant group and non-participant group should be analyzed to: help determine whether the savings obse...

AI summary The evaluation report of the 2014 DSM programs highlights that residential and business programs achieved energy savings above their targets, with the Home Energy Report (HER) contributing to the results. However, concerns were raised about verifying the savings attributable to HER, and the actual expenditure was below the approved budget.

he $53 million that was in rates for DSM in 2014 and which amount was subsequently repurposed by Order of the Board for 2015 fuel expenses. It expanded on these points in its post-hearing submission: - It is $69 million, or 38 percent. les...

AI summary The document discusses the repurposing of funds allocated for demand-side management (DSM) in 2014 for 2015 fuel expenses and outlines the proposed DSM Plan's investment levels. It emphasizes affordability, cost-effectiveness, and participation balance across sectors, ensuring long-term planning and avoiding new capacity additions until 2032.

3.5.2.1 Findings [71] The CA summarized his view of the purpose of a DSM program: The basic purpose is to reduce the level of energy required by Nova Scotia in the future, both short and long term. DSM programs are an integral component in...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate emphasizes the importance of DSM programs in reducing energy demand and supporting Nova Scotia's energy strategy. The Board expresses concerns with NSPI's plan, noting reduced residential spending and a disconnect with the IRP, while favoring El's plan for better alignment with the PUA and long-term cost savings.

This suggests that the targets could have been met with less spending. [74] The Board is also very concerned about the lack of rigor with respect to the determination of incentives. The Board is not satisfied that El presently has sufficie...

AI summary The Board is concerned about the lack of rigor in determining incentives for achieving savings targets and has reduced the Quantum Agreement amounts by 10% for 2016, 2017, and 2018. The Board also denied inflationary increases requested by E1 due to insufficient evidence linking NSPI's costs to general inflation.

5.0 SUMMARY OF BOARD FINDINGS [138] E1 applied to the Board for approval of its 2016-2018 DSM Plan, pursuant to s. 79J(3) of the PUA , as it was unable to reach agreement with NSPI on the terms of the Supply Agreement. E1 sought approval f...

AI summary The Board rejected the Quantum Agreement and approved a reduced DSM spending of $102.15 million over three years, a 10% reduction, due to concerns about underspending and overachievement of savings targets, aiming to improve incentive calculations.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: - 1. The Board approves a DSM Plan for 2016-2018 in the aggregate amount of $102,150,000 with a target of total cumulative energy savings of 405.9 GWh and demand savings of 62.5 MW. Approved spending is $33,210,0...

AI summary The Board has approved a DSM Plan for 2016-2018 with a total budget of $102,150,000, setting energy and demand savings targets. It also approved a supply agreement between E1 and NSPI, and directed E1 and NSPI to file various reports and analyses, including on financing deferrals, accounting treatments, and locational DSM efforts.

CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT of THIS CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT this stfclav , 2015 made 0ctober Between: "EfficiencyOne" EfficiencyOne, hereinafter of the Party First Part And Scotia Power Incorporated, hereinafter "NSPI" No...

AI summary This document outlines a confidentiality and non-disclosure agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, entered into in October 2015. The agreement is related to a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities effective January 1, 2016, under which EfficiencyOne provides EECA services to NSPI.

4 Figure 1.2 - 2016 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2016 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)" Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total...

AI summary Figure 1.2 presents the 2016 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, detailing program investments, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings across residential and non-residential sectors. It includes data on program costs, benefits, and savings metrics such as Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost (PAC).

Figure 1.3 - 2017 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2017 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)8 Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Re...

AI summary Figure 1.3 outlines the 2017 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, detailing program-specific investments, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings across residential and non-residential categories. It highlights the total investment and associated savings across various demand-side management initiatives.

Figure 1.4 - 2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment 2018 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)" Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Re...

AI summary Figure 1.4 outlines the 2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment, showing the investment amounts, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings for various programs. The table includes data on residential and non-residential programs, as well as enabling strategies, with figures expressed in 2018 dollars.

30 1 will through Custom Efficient Rebates incentives the Incentives and Products programs 2 New be for measures but by available that qualify that are not supported the 3 Construction Program. 4 5 market The Custom Incentives program will...

AI summary The document outlines the continuation of the Custom Incentives program, which offers tailored energy efficiency solutions for various market segments. It includes retro-commissioning, compressed air optimization, energy management systems, onsite energy manager services, and employee engagement initiatives.

w income programming on a stronger footing. Efficiency funding below the recommended amount will severely undermine the likelihood of low income rental programming being initiated in the next 3 years. Even the Direct Install program that o...

AI summary The text highlights concerns that reduced efficiency funding, particularly below the recommended $113.5 million for 2016-18, could prevent the initiation of low income rental programming in the next three years. It criticizes NS Power's proposed funding cuts, which would severely impact the Direct Install program and hinder ongoing research and development for low income renters.

DATE FILED: July 8, 2015 Page 20 of 50 1 7.0 NS POWER'S PROPOSED SPENDING LEVEL 2 3 E1 has asserted that a reduction in DSM spending levels to $22 million per year would be 4 too drastic a change to implement and would require it "going al...

AI summary E1 argues that reducing DSM spending to $22 million per year would be too drastic, but NS Power claims there is no evidence this would impact DSM stability. NS Power's proposed 100 GWh of energy savings is slightly higher than E1's 2015 plan without the Home Energy Report. The Home Energy Report is provided by a non-Nova Scotian entity and its removal does not affect DSM capacity.

29 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan (M06733), Transcript, June 18, page 653, lines 9-17. The evidence presented was clear that E1 is capable of producing more energy savings for less cost. NS Power's analysis demonstrates the...

AI summary The text discusses the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of energy savings programs, particularly the Demand Side Management (DSM) plan. E1 is shown to be capable of producing more energy savings at a lower cost than previously modeled. NS Power's proposed DSM first year unit cost of $0.22/kWh is compared to averages in other Canadian jurisdictions. The text highlights the potential for cost reductions in energy efficiency programs.

- 3 "amount that Nova Scotia Power Incorporated will pay to the franchise holder for the supply of - electricity, efficiency and conservation activities"[22](#page-15-0) 4 over the course of the contract. 5 - 6 In conjunction with these in...

AI summary EfficiencyOne proposes a modified 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan with energy and demand savings targets, developed in line with the Public Utilities Act and based on analyses from NS Power's 2014 IRP. EfficiencyOne asserts that the plan is cost-effective and affordable, despite concerns raised by NS Power about affordability.

(V) CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS - 76. This was the first contract to be negotiated between E1 and NSPI. It is unfortunate that the parties were not able to reach agreement however, the silver lining is that the process provided more inf...

AI summary The Industrial Group recommends the Board approve a Non-Budgetary Consensus Agreement, reject E1's proposed DSM investment level, and direct E1 to implement a lower spending plan with specific energy and demand savings targets. They also request additional time for settlement discussions and emphasize the need for transparency and appropriate incentive levels in E1's programs.

Benefit Description Avoided cost of energy Avoided marginal cost of energy produced Avoided cost of capacity Avoided cost of generating capacity Avoided cost of transmission and distribution Value of avoiding or deferring the construction...

AI summary The text outlines various categories of avoided costs, including energy, capacity, transmission, distribution, environmental compliance, and renewable portfolio standards, as well as nonenergy benefits to utilities. It also notes the overlap between Baatz's and Woolf's perspectives on beneficial avoided costs.

100 GWH PLAN - NS Power recommends the Board direct EfficiencyOne to develop a DSM plan that would deliver 100 GWh per year in energy savings over the contract period at a cost of $22 Million per year[6](#page-5-2) . NS Power suggests its...

AI summary NS Power proposes a 100 GWh DSM plan at a cost of $22 million per year, arguing it supports affordability and avoids capacity additions until 2032. The Department of Energy supports this plan but emphasizes equitable program design. EfficiencyOne disputes this, arguing that the plan underestimates demand savings and may compromise overall benefits.

& lt;sup>46 Exhibit E-33, NS Power Revised Evidence, June 1, 2015, Figure 3.8, page 33 1 2 3 the application's accepted, $38.5 million on DSM to save 6 to $8 million on fuel. So it'll be an incremental cost to customers in that year of app...

AI summary The document discusses the financial implications of a DSM (Demand Side Management) plan, including a proposed investment of $38.5 million, expected savings on fuel costs, and potential incremental costs to customers. It also highlights the debate over the optimal level of DSM investment and the importance of consistency in funding.

1 was the expert testimony of Mr. Pickles that "the level of industry capacity should rise 2 and fall with the level of need for the DSM resource itself."49 3 4 The IG provides a succinct summary in its Closing Submission of the inherent p...

AI summary The document discusses expert testimony regarding the need for flexibility in demand-side management (DSM) resource planning, particularly in response to changing product prices. It also highlights concerns raised by the Independent Governor (IG) about the lack of evidence supporting E1's claims regarding the costs and impacts of scaling back the DSM budget.

were applied as defined in the methodology. Also, in recommendation HER-R3, Econoler noted that past electricity consumption for the participant group and non-participant group should be analyzed to: help determine whether the savings obse...

AI summary The evaluation report of the 2014 DSM programs highlights that residential and business programs achieved energy and demand savings above their targets, though the Home Energy Report (HER) results were questioned. The report recommends analyzing past electricity consumption trends over five years to ensure savings attributed to HER are accurate. The actual expenditure was below the approved budget.

programs, particularly as it relates to incentives. The Industrial Group expressed concern about the level of incentives as well as the role incentives play with respect to energy efficiency targets. - 45. The Industrial Group is very conc...

AI summary The Industrial Group is concerned about the level of incentives in E1's energy efficiency programs and how they affect E1's ability to meet energy savings targets. They also recommend that E1 model various funding scenarios in future hearings. The DOE supports a lower spending level, close to or at the $22 million per year suggested by NSPI.

3.5.2.1 Findings [71] The CA summarized his view of the purpose of a DSM program: The basic purpose is to reduce the level of energy required by Nova Scotia in the future, both short and long term. DSM programs are an integral component in...

AI summary The CA emphasizes the importance of DSM programs in reducing energy demand and supporting Nova Scotia's energy strategy. The Board criticizes the NSPI Plan for significantly reducing residential DSM spending and disconnecting from the IRP's long-term cost-saving goals. The El Plan is viewed as more aligned with the PUA and IRP, though concerns remain about past underspending and overachievement of energy savings targets by El.

demand savings in most years as noted in the following chart which was prepared by Board Staff based on historical information: Program Year Expenditures (S million) Savings Energy (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Plan Actual Plan Actual Plan Act...

AI summary The text presents a chart showing expenditures and savings related to demand-side management programs from 2008 to 2015. The data includes planned and actual figures for expenditures, energy savings, and demand savings, highlighting the performance of these programs over time.

This suggests that the targets could have been met with less spending. [74] The Board is also very concerned about the lack of rigor with respect to the determination of incentives. The Board is not satisfied that El presently has sufficie...

AI summary The Board is concerned about the lack of rigor in determining incentives for achieving energy savings targets and has reduced the Quantum Agreement amounts by 10% for 2016, 2017, and 2018. The Board also denied inflationary increases requested by E1 due to insufficient evidence linking NSPI's costs to inflation.

15 Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study at the Base Level, were provided by NS 16 Power. They include the cost of energy and capacity. 22 23 21 13 14 17 18 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expr...

AI summary The document discusses annual avoided costs calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study, including energy and capacity costs provided by NS Power. It also references benefit/cost ratios (TRC and PAC) and mentions ENS's planned participation by low-income customers based on the 2015 DSM Resource Settlement Agreement.

Figure 4. 2018 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2018 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Reso...

AI summary Figure 4 presents the 2018 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings, detailing the investment amounts, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings for various residential and non-residential DSM programs, along with their associated costs and savings metrics.

to run shall be included. If the last day of the period so computed is not a Business Day, then the period shall run until the close of business on the next Business Day; (k) the Contract Documents are complementary, and what is required b...

AI summary This section outlines the terms and conditions of the agreement between NSPI and EfficiencyOne, including the term of the agreement, which is three years from the Effective Date, and the reservation of rights by NSPI under Section 79I(3) of the Act. It also establishes the order of precedence for documents in case of conflicts.

NS Power. They include the cost of energy and capacity. a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio co...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of lifetime benefits and costs associated with energy efficiency programs, including net present value of avoided costs and benefit/cost ratios such as TRC and PAC. It references figures that detail program-level investment and savings for 2016.

1 Figure 1.3 - 2017 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2017 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total...

AI summary Figure 1.3 presents the 2017 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, including program-specific investments, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings. The table includes various residential and business programs, along with enabling strategies.

Figure 1.4 - 2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment 2018 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total R...

AI summary Figure 1.4 presents the 2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment, including details on investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy and demand savings, and cost tests for various residential and business programs. The table highlights the financial and efficiency outcomes of different demand-side management initiatives.

1 incentives through the Custom Incentives and Efficient Products Rebates programs will 2 be available for measures that qualify but that are not supported by the New 3 Construction Program. 4 5 The Custom Incentives program will continue...

AI summary The document outlines the continuation of the Custom Incentives and Efficient Products Rebates programs, which provide financial incentives for energy efficiency measures not supported by the New Construction Program. These programs include retro-commissioning, compressed air system optimization, EMIS, SEM, OEM services, and employee engagement initiatives.

3 4 Figure 1.2 - 2016 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2016 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Tota...

AI summary The document presents a comparison of investment and savings data from the 2016 DSM Resource Plan, detailing various residential and business programs, their investments, benefits, and cost tests. It includes metrics such as lifetime benefits, energy and demand savings, and cost tests like TRC and PAC.

a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to the sum of ENS's and partic...

AI summary The text defines lifetime benefits as the net present value of avoided energy and capacity costs over the life of program measures. It also introduces the TRC (Total Benefit/Cost Ratio), which compares these benefits to the combined costs incurred by ENS and participants.

c PAC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to ENS's costs. d Reflects ENS's planned participation by low income customers, per the 2015 DSM Resource Settlement Agreement. Figure 1.3 - 2017 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Sa...

AI summary The document presents a 2017 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings table, highlighting various programs and their associated investments, benefits, and cost tests. It includes specific figures for residential and business programs, as well as enabling strategies, with data expressed in 2016-2017 dollars.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. & lt;sup>b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to the sum o...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of lifetime benefits for energy efficiency programs, expressed as the net present value of avoided costs. It defines TRC and PAC as benefit/cost ratios and references ENS's planned participation by low-income customers as outlined in the 2015 DSM Resource Settlement Agreement.

1 Figure 1.4 - 2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment 2018 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total...

AI summary The document presents data on the 2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment, including details on investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy and demand savings, and cost tests for various residential and business programs. The data is split into two currency tables, with differences in figures likely due to rounding and currency conversion.

a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to the sum of ENS's and partic...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of lifetime benefits and the Total Benefit/Cost Ratio (TRC), which compares the net present value of avoided costs to the combined costs of ENS and participants over the life of a program.

1 incentives through the Custom Incentives and Efficient Products Rebates programs will 2 be available for measures that qualify but that are not supported by the New 3 Construction Program. 4 5 The Custom Incentives program will continue...

AI summary The Custom Incentives and Efficient Products Rebates programs will provide incentives for energy efficiency measures not supported by the New Construction Program. The Custom Incentives program will focus on tailored offerings such as retro-commissioning, EMIS, and SEM. The Direct Installation program allows small to medium businesses to access no-charge energy audits and financial incentives for energy-efficient upgrades, with options for interest-free financing.

- (e) " Contract Documents " means without limitation, the following documents, including any amendments thereto agreed in writing by the parties: - (i) this Agreement; and - (ii) all Schedules to the Agreement. - (f) " Contract Price " ha...

AI summary The text defines key terms in a contract, including 'Contract Documents,' 'Contract Price,' 'EECA Plan,' 'Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities,' 'Event of Default,' and 'Environmental Laws.' It outlines the scope of these terms and provides examples of Force Majeure Events.

27.1 Subject to the provisions of the Act, all provisions of this Agreement which by their express terms or nature are continuing shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, without limitation, this provision,...

AI summary This section outlines that certain provisions of the Agreement will remain in effect even after the Agreement's expiration or termination, including provisions related to the EECA Plan, confidentiality, indemnity, and other general provisions.

29 The figure below identifies the scope of savings (3-year Cumulative Annual Net Energy and Net 30 Peak Demand Savings) associated with carrying out EECAs over the Term.

AI summary The text references a figure that outlines the scope of savings from Energy Efficiency and Conservation Activities (EECAs) over a three-year period, including cumulative annual net energy and net peak demand savings.

35 The above performance targets will be achieved in accordance with the EECA Plan set out in 36 Schedule E, having regard to the flexibility to amend as permitted by the Consensus Agreement 37 as adopted by the Board. 38 \ For certainty,...

AI summary The document outlines performance targets to be achieved in accordance with the EECA Plan in Schedule E, with flexibility to amend as permitted by the Consensus Agreement adopted by the Board. It also mentions that EfficiencyOne will be considered in substantial compliance if it achieves 90% or more of the Performance Targets, otherwise triggering a regulatory process.

27. SURVIVAL 27.1 Subject to the provisions of the Act, all provisions of this Agreement which by their express terms or nature are continuing shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, without limitation, th...

AI summary This section outlines the survival of specific provisions in the Agreement upon its expiration or termination, including those related to the EECA Plan, confidentiality, indemnity, and intellectual property, among others.

The figure below identifies the scope of savings (3-year Cumulative Annual Net Energy and Net Peak Demand Savings) associated with carrying out EECAs over the Term. Cumulative Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator over the Term (GWh) Cumu...

AI summary The text outlines performance targets for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities (EECA) over a 3-year term, specifying cumulative net energy and peak demand savings. Achievement of these targets is tied to the EECA Plan and Consensus Agreement, with a regulatory process triggered if less than 90% of the targets are met.

2 NS Power. They include the cost of energy and capacity. a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio...

AI summary The text discusses program-level investment and savings for 2016, including cost calculations related to energy and capacity, as well as benefit/cost ratios such as TRC and PAC. It references figures that provide financial details of the programs.

1 Figure 1.3 - 2017 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2017 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total...

AI summary Figure 1.3 outlines the 2017 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, including details on residential and non-residential programs, their respective investments, benefits, energy and demand savings, and cost tests such as TRC and PAC.

Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study at the Base Level, were provided by NS Power. They include the cost of energy and capacity. a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs,...

AI summary Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study, were provided by NS Power and include energy and capacity costs. Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of these avoided costs. TRC and PAC are benefit/cost ratios comparing lifetime benefits to combined and individual costs, respectively. The data reflects ENS's planned participation by low-income customers under the 2015 DSM Resource Settlement Agreement.

Figure 1.4 - 2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment 2018 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total R...

AI summary Figure 1.4 from the 2018 DSM Resource Plan outlines investments and benefits for various energy efficiency programs, including residential and business initiatives. It highlights the financial and energy savings associated with these programs, along with metrics like the Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC).

1 incentives through the Custom Incentives and Efficient Products Rebates programs will 2 be available for measures that qualify but that are not supported by the New 3 Construction Program. 4 5 The Custom Incentives program will continue...

AI summary The Custom Incentives and Efficient Products Rebates programs will provide incentives for energy efficiency measures not covered by the New Construction Program. These programs target specific market segments and include offerings like retro-commissioning, compressed air system optimization, and energy management systems. ENS plans to expand services and recruit additional trade partners.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: - 1. The Board approves a DSM Plan for 2016-2018 in the aggregate amount of $102,150,000 with a target of total cumulative energy savings of 405.9 GWh and demand savings of 62.5 MW. Approved spending is $33,210,0...

AI summary The Board approves a DSM Plan for 2016-2018 with a budget of $102.15 million and sets targets for energy and demand savings. It also approves a supply agreement, consensus agreement, and various filing requirements. The TRC test is maintained, and E1 is directed to explore alternate DSM budget scenarios and improve incentive determination processes.

On the First Business Day of: 2016 20173 20184 Total January $0 $2,900,436 $2,977,167 February $0 $2,641,338 $2,711,215 March $0 $2,833,345 $2,908,301 April $2,596,090 $3,010,077 $3,089,709 May $2,483,522 $2,544,095 $2,611,400 June $2,307,...

AI summary The table presents financial figures for payments made by NSPI in 2016, 2017, and 2018, with a total of approximately $93.6 million. A note explains that 2017 payments will be adjusted based on 2015 under-spending by EfficiencyOne and interest earned in 2015.

This Plan has been modified to comply with the Utility and Review Board (UARB)'s August 12, 2015 Decision, which set annual DSM investment amounts of $33.21 million, 1 million million $34.02 and $34.92 for 2016, 2017, and 2018 respectively...

AI summary This document outlines modifications to a DSM Plan to comply with the UARB's August 12, 2015 Decision, which set annual investment amounts of $33.21 million for 2016, $34.02 million for 2017, and $34.92 million for 2018. It describes ENS's proposed programs and strategies for achieving energy and demand savings targets.

a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value ofthe avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life ofthe program measures. , b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to the sum ofENS's and partici...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of lifetime benefits, TRC, and PAC ratios, which compare the net present value of avoided costs to investment and participation costs. It also references figures that show program-level investment and savings for the years 2016, 2017, and 2018.

4 Figure 1.2 - 2016 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2016 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)" Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total...

AI summary Figure 1.2 outlines the 2016 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, including program investments, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings. The data shows various residential and business programs, their associated investments, and their impact on energy efficiency and cost savings.

Figure 1.3 - 2017 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2017 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)8 Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Re...

AI summary Figure 1.3 presents the 2017 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings, outlining investments, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings for various residential and business programs. The table includes program-specific data such as investment amounts, benefits, and cost tests.

Figure 1.4 - 2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment 2018 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)" Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Re...

AI summary Figure 1.4 presents the 2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment, detailing investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy and demand savings, and cost tests for various programs. The data includes residential and non-residential programs and their respective financial and efficiency metrics.

3 4 5 6 7 The BNI Efficient Product Rebates program provides financial incentives, through prescriptive rebates, on a wide variety of products to encourage BNI end-users to reduce electrical energy consumption and peak demand. Customers ar...

AI summary The BNI Efficient Product Rebates program offers prescriptive rebates for energy-efficient products to reduce electrical energy consumption and peak demand. Eligible customers can choose from a predefined list of measures, with rebates delivered via mail-in applications or discounts at the point of purchase. The program aims to raise awareness, encourage the use of efficient products, increase market penetration, and transform market practices.

30 1 will through Custom Efficient Rebates incentives the Incentives and Products programs 10 ofthe ofthe complements, much value service will be provided through the initial energy 11 access new Efficiency Partner Network. audits and to t...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs, including rebates and incentives for efficient products, and mentions the evolution of the Direct Installation program to meet changing market demands. It references BNI and other initiatives related to energy efficiency.

Business, non-profit and institutional programs - Efficient Product Rebates consists of both mail-in and point-of-purchase incentives. The Efficient Product Rebates program provides financial incentives through prescriptive rebates on a wi...

AI summary The document describes two key programs under business, non-profit, and institutional initiatives: Efficient Product Rebates and Custom Incentives. The Efficient Product Rebates program offers financial incentives for energy-efficient products, while the Custom Incentives program supports energy audits and technical changes in existing or new facilities to reduce energy consumption and peak demand.

EfficiencyOne Statement of Operations and Changes in Fund Balance - Demand Side Management Fund For 2016, 2017 & 2018 Estimates Only. 2016 2017 2018 Revenue 36,900,000 37,800,000 38,800,000 Expenses Direct Costs Incentives 25,547,000 26,18...

AI summary The document presents the financial operations and fund balance changes for the EfficiencyOne Demand Side Management Fund from 2016 to 2018. It outlines revenue, direct costs, and other program and administrative expenses over the three-year period, with projected figures provided for each year.