Topic:"Energy Efficiency Financing" in M06733

Figure 3.4 - 2018 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2018 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total R...

AI summary Figure 3.4 presents the 2018 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, detailing program investments, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings across residential, business, nonprofit, and institutional programs, along with enabling strategies.

Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study at the Base Level, were provided by NS Power. They include the cost of energy and capacity. 2 1 & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the av...

AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs calculated using ENSC's DSM Potential Study, including energy and capacity costs. It also references lifetime benefits, TRC and PAC ratios, and ENS's planned participation by low-income customers as outlined in the 2015 DSM Resource Plan Settlement Agreement.

4.3.1 Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing ENS recognizes a lack of upfront capital can be a barrier to customers adopting energy efficiency measures. For this reason, financing DSM activities is a complementary incentive struct...

AI summary ENS acknowledges upfront capital as a barrier to energy efficiency, supporting financing as a complement to rebates. Despite low historical participation rates, ENS continues to assist municipalities in developing PACE programs, which allow tax add-ons for energy upgrades. ENS's role is an Enabling Strategy, not direct service provision.

Update on Implementation of 2013 Verification and Evaluation Recommendations B C E F G K 3 4 Efficiency Nova Scotia should take steps to carefully establish a Nova Scotia TRM. This would facilitate both program planning and evaluation. Sav...

AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENSC) is working to establish a Nova Scotia Total Resource Cost (TRM) model to facilitate program planning and evaluation. A draft TRM was completed in Q4 2014 and is being operationalized into business practices, with completion expected in 2015 following the incorporation of 2014 evaluation results.

Assumptions used in ENS's 2016-2018 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis Stakeholder Stakeholder Comment ENSC's Response Inclusion in the model that ENSC has "conservatively" estimated that 80% of BNI customers who access the Upstream Business En...

AI summary ENSC has estimated that 80% of BNI customers participating in Upstream Business Energy Rebates (UBERs) are already in other ENS DSM programs. ENSC acknowledges this assumption and plans to refine it in the future with stakeholder input.

HAWAII Hawaii Energy is the program administrator in the island state, and is eligible to receive a performance incentive tied to the achievement of five targets (Table 6). Hawaii Energy's maximum performance incentive is $830,000 per year...

AI summary Hawaii Energy, the program administrator in Hawaii, is eligible for a performance incentive of up to $830,000 annually, representing 2.5% of its total annual budget, contingent on meeting five targets outlined in Table 6.

Figure 9: Resource Value Framework - NS Qualitative Assessment Program Name: Electric DSM Date: December 2014 1. Key Assumptions, Parameters and S ummary of Resu its Analysis Level ✓ Program Alialysis Level □ Portfolio Measure Life n/a Dis...

AI summary Figure 9 presents a qualitative assessment of the Resource Value Framework for the Electric DSM program in Nova Scotia as of December 2014. It outlines key assumptions, monetized program administrator costs and benefits, participant costs and benefits, public costs and benefits, and non-monetized public benefits.

Table 11: General Recommendations on ENSC Program Manuals No. Recommendations OV-R1. Consider the core budget allocation in the cost/subsidy ratio and cost-effectiveness tests. Every organization has a so-called core budget that supports i...

AI summary The text discusses recommendations for improving ENSC program manuals by incorporating core budget allocations into cost/subsidy ratios and documenting pilot projects. These changes aim to ensure accurate cost-effectiveness assessments and provide evaluators with comprehensive information from the start of the evaluation process.

Data-tracking and reporting is crucial for effective program management as well as for evaluation purposes. In 2010, ENSC implemented an online Demand-Side Management Data System (DSMDS) and has been working on its improvement since then....

AI summary Data-tracking and reporting are essential for managing and evaluating energy efficiency programs. ENSC implemented the DSMDS in 2010 and improved it over time, allowing for centralized tracking of projects. However, some program components still use custom tools or external data sources for tracking. The Evaluator praised ENSC's efforts and highlighted areas for improvement in data tracking systems.

Table 12: Recommendations for Instant Savings No. Recommendations Instant-R3. Better communicate with the retailers regarding the program processes and timeline. This year, some retailers expressed some dissatisfaction with the time waited...

AI summary Table 12 outlines a recommendation to improve communication between ENSC and retailers regarding the Instant Savings program. Retailers expressed dissatisfaction with delays in receiving approved product lists and rebate payments, while ENSC claims it met contractual timelines. The Evaluator suggests that unclear communication may have led to misunderstandings.

Table 13: Recommendations for Green Heat No. Recommendations GH-R5. Similar to the results of the literature review for wood and pellet stoves, the Evaluator did not find any updated studies for wood and pellet furnaces/boilers. Since the...

AI summary The Evaluator recommends retaining current unitary savings figures for wood and pellet furnaces/boilers, as no updated studies are available. These figures are based on past simulations and a 2012 billing analysis, and the limited number of installations makes further analysis difficult.

The 2014 evaluation of Residential Financing demonstrated that this pilot was designed in accordance with most of the process-related recommendations made by the Evaluator since the 2011 evaluation. Residential Financing has a program manu...

AI summary The 2014 evaluation of the Residential Financing program found that it was well-designed, following standard practices. It had 66 participants, with the zero-percent interest rate being a key motivator for participation. Most participants relied on ENSC financing to complete home upgrades, and preferred it over other financing options.

eference for a zero-percent interest loan rate rather than a low-interest loan coupled with a rebate, except if both loan options offered the same overall cost or if monthly budgeting posed a problem. The level of satisfaction with Residen...

AI summary Participants expressed high satisfaction with the Residential Financing program, particularly with the ease of application, timeliness of approvals, and support from ENSC staff. Suggestions for improvement include promoting the financing option earlier in the application process and establishing a formal communication timeline for loan disbursements.

Table 16: Recommendations for Residential Financing No. Recommendations Fin-R5. The Evaluator recommends that for internal control purposes, ENSC continue to collect information regarding the number of financing requests received per year,...

AI summary The Evaluator recommends that ENSC continue to collect data on financing requests, including the number of accepted or rejected requests and default payments, to establish performance indicators for internal control purposes.

Table 18: Recommendations for Custom Retrofit No. Recommendations Custom-R9. Supply service providers with a standardized summary document for them to report the actual measures implemented: This document will help ensure that savings and...

AI summary Table 18 recommends providing service providers with a standardized summary document to report actual measures implemented in custom retrofits. The document will clarify savings and costs for each measure, avoid combining non-electrical and electrical savings, and include substantiation approaches such as schedule logs and engineering calculations.

Table 20: Recommendations for Business Energy Solutions No. Recommendations BES-R8. Plan on the complete and ultimate removal of CFLs and fluorescent T8 tubes from Business Energy Solutions. Business Energy Solutions results showed that sa...

AI summary The document recommends the removal of CFLs and fluorescent T8 tubes from Business Energy Solutions due to declining savings and the increasing cost-effectiveness of LED technology. Savings from these technologies have significantly decreased, and as LED costs drop, their complete removal is planned.

such training would further improve the positive impact of those events. 2014 Instant-R3. Better communicate with the retailers regarding the program processes and timeline. This year, some retailers expressed some dissatisfaction with the...

AI summary The evaluation highlights issues with communication between ENSC and retailers regarding program processes and timelines, as well as a reduction in the evaluated savings of LED lamps due to changes in baseline wattage and market trends. ENSC is advised to improve communication and continue monitoring market evolution.

a significant proportion of errors in the wattage information entered in the tracking sheet. The Evaluator therefore commends ENSC on this improvement and encourages them to pursue this verification. The tracking sheet also provides inform...

AI summary The Evaluator notes that ENSC has improved data accuracy in the tracking sheet but highlights issues such as missing model numbers and pricing information. The tracking sheet is praised for its conciseness but requires improvements in data completeness for accurate savings calculations.

the report was mailed out. While ENSC is confident that all payment demands were treated within the set deadline of 45 days, there was still some dissatisfaction with this aspect among the retailers. Mixed opinions were offered regarding t...

AI summary The report discusses dissatisfaction among retailers regarding the 45-day payment deadline and the preparation process for energy efficiency campaigns. Independent retailers were generally satisfied, while nationwide retailers expressed frustrations about the timing of product approvals and the lack of advance notice for rebated products.

This Appendix summarizes all the recommendations made by the Evaluator throughout this report as well as the sections from which the recommendations originated. Sections Recommendations 3 Better communicate with the retailers regarding the...

AI summary The appendix highlights the need for better communication between ENSC and retailers regarding program processes and timelines. Retailers were dissatisfied with delays in receiving approved product lists and rebate payments, though ENSC claims it met contractual timelines. The Evaluator suggests that poor communication may have caused misunderstandings.

SECTION V – VERIFICATION OF PRODUCTS FROM DATABASE V1. and validate the information with the interviewee. From the database, check the products that received the program discount for each campaign April-May Campaign October-November Campai...

AI summary This section outlines the verification process for products that received program discounts during specific campaigns, focusing on regular ENERGY STAR CFLs. It includes questions about sales volume, campaign impact, and the effect of discounts on sales.

C2a. By what percentage do you estimate the number of regular Energy Star CFL bulbs sold in your store would have been lower during the April-May campaign if the discount had not been available? RECORD PERCENTAGE ___% - C6. What influence...

AI summary The text asks about the impact of the Instant Savings program on CFL sales, including the percentage of sales outside the spring campaign that can be attributed to the program. It also inquires about the program's influence on salespeople's knowledge, product variety, and customer awareness.

APPENDIX IV IN-STORE VISIT PROTOCOL Spring Visit Report Store Name: Address: Date of Visit: Eligible Products $3 - Energy Star Regular CFLs (multipacks of 2 or more) $3 - Energy Star Specialty CFLs (single or double packs) $5 - Energy Star...

AI summary This appendix outlines an in-store visit protocol that includes a list of eligible products and their corresponding rebate amounts for energy-efficient items such as LED bulbs, thermostats, and refrigerators.

Fall Visit Report Store Name: Address: Date of Visit: Eligible Products $3 – Energy Star LED lights (Aline, GU10, Candle/Chandelier) $5 – Energy Star LED lights (PAR, MR and BR) $8 – Energy Star LED light bulbs (packs of 2 or more) $15 – E...

AI summary The document outlines eligible products and their respective rebate amounts for energy-efficient upgrades, including LED lights, thermostats, and refrigerators, under a program offering financial incentives for Energy Star certified products.

Do not ask the following questions directly to the representative. Simply show interest in the product/event. In-Store Event Section of the Store where the Event Takes Place Location of the event (which section in the store). Is it a high...

AI summary This table outlines an in-store event related to energy efficiency programs, focusing on the location of the event, the information provided by representatives, and the visibility of the event through promotional materials. It includes questions about product rebates, rebate amounts, and other programs promoted by ENSC.

Knowledge of the Program and Products - 1. Are there rebates that apply to this type of product? - 2. What is the amount of the rebate? - 3. Is it the same amount for all products? - 4. Until when does the rebate apply? - 5. (If salesperso...

AI summary This section outlines a series of questions related to rebate programs for energy-efficient products, focusing on eligibility, rebate amounts, duration, and similarity across products. It also references the Instant Savings program and Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENSC).

Program Overview HEA encourages homeowners in Nova Scotia to improve the energy efficiency and comfort of their homes. HEA focuses on building envelope insulation measures, such as draft proofing, installation of ENERGY STAR-qualified wind...

AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program in Nova Scotia encourages homeowners to improve home energy efficiency through insulation measures and financial incentives. The program includes pre- and post-retrofit assessments and is funded by electricity ratepayers for electricity-related measures and taxpayers for other fuel-related measures.

Revised Savings The Evaluator reviewed the unitary savings values used for all the types of Green Heat equipment by performing a literature review. The research mainly focused on identifying more recent technical reference guides, and rece...

AI summary The Evaluator reviewed unitary savings values for Green Heat equipment, focusing on central ducted, geothermal, and air-to-water heat pumps. The OPA’s 2014 Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions List underestimates savings when replacing electric resistance heat. The PUC’s 2015 Technical Resource Manual provides EFLH-based formulas adaptable to Nova Scotia’s climate.

FR3. [IF REBATE] Efficiency Nova Scotia paid you $[INCENTIVE] for your new space heating system. If you had not received the rebate from Efficiency Nova Scotia, would you have made the same purchase? [IF FINANCING] Efficiency Nova Scotia p...

AI summary The document asks respondents whether they would have made the same purchase of a space heating system without the rebate or financing provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It also asks them to rate the importance of various factors influencing their decision to replace their heating system.

1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Low Income Homeowner (LIH) undertaken by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) aims to facilitate the implementation of cost-effective building envelope measures in homes owned by lowincome customers across Nova S...

AI summary The Low Income Homeowner (LIH) program, managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), provides cost-effective building envelope improvements and energy-efficient appliance replacements at no cost to low-income homeowners. Measures are funded by electricity ratepayers for electrically heated homes and provincial funds for non-electrically heated homes. The program also includes the Residential Direct Install (RDI) component, which offers low-cost energy-efficient products. In 2014, LIH aimed to achieve 1.9 GWh of electricity savings and 0.4 MW of peak demand savings.

Revised Savings The Evaluator updated the unitary savings by using the average consumption value of old appliances replaced and the average consumption value of ENERGY STAR® refrigerators from the ARet3 2014 Evaluation Report. Since the LI...

AI summary The Evaluator updated unitary savings calculations by using the average consumption of old appliances replaced and new ENERGY STAR® refrigerators from the 2014 ARet evaluation. It considers the average size and energy consumption of old refrigerators and assumes no part-use factor due to the low likelihood of two refrigerators in a low-income household.

Revised Savings In 2014, the majority of the new models installed were ENERGY STAR® models (98 %), but non-ENERGY STAR® models were also installed when ENERGY STAR® models of the same size were not available. In fact, Energy Star has recen...

AI summary In 2014, Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) installed mostly ENERGY STAR® freezers, but non-ENERGY STAR® models were used when smaller sizes were unavailable. The Evaluator updated savings calculations to reflect the installation of non-ENERGY STAR® freezers and used data from the ARet 2014 Evaluation Report to establish average consumption values for both old and new freezers, resulting in a weighted unitary savings value of 496 kWh per year.

Program Component Overview Residential Financing is a zero-percent interest rate financing pilot initiative available to eligible participants in three of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's (ENSC) program components: Green Heat, Solar (f...

AI summary Residential Financing is a zero-percent interest rate pilot initiative offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) for eligible participants in Green Heat, Solar, and Home Energy Assessment programs. The pilot was initially offered in 2012 with RBC and re-launched in 2013 with a new financial partner.

Recommendations Overall, the Econoler team assessed that Residential Financing was useful in helping participants complete energy efficiency upgrades. In addition to the general recommendations presented for all ENSC program components in...

AI summary The Econoler team recommends integrating Residential Financing into existing ENSC program components, increasing awareness of the financing option, developing a formal communications timeline, and monitoring the loan disbursement process to improve participant experience and program effectiveness.

2.2.3 Interviews with Participants In November 2014, CRA conducted 10 participant interviews to collect their feedback on the following aspects of Residential Financing: - › Pilot awareness - › Participant motivations - › Satisfaction with...

AI summary In November 2014, CRA conducted 10 interviews with participants to gather feedback on the Residential Financing pilot, focusing on awareness, motivations, satisfaction, financing preferences, and recommendations for improvement.

3.2 Pilot Design and Evaluation Most incentives offered by energy efficiency programs are meant to offset part or all of the incremental cost of energy efficiency measures. If the participant does not have enough capital to pay for a measu...

AI summary The Evaluator recommends integrating Residential Financing into Green Heat, Solar, and HEA programs for evaluation purposes due to misleading distinctions. Issues with loan disbursement, including delays and misallocation, were reported but resolved by ENSC. Contractors and participants' satisfaction with the process and performance indicators should be monitored.

3.3 Pilot Documentation As part of the evaluation, the Evaluator analyzed the program documentation and worked together with the PM to improve and revise the program manual, the evaluation plan and the logic model, where applicable. More s...

AI summary The Evaluator reviewed pilot documentation for Residential Financing and worked with the Program Manager to revise program materials. Key issues included the need to address barriers like low creditworthiness and the inclusion of alternative financing sources. The Evaluator recommends integrating Residential Financing documentation into Green Heat, Solar, and HEA programs and using a workflow checklist in the Data Management System to improve administrative procedures.

4 MARKET EVALUATION This section presents the findings of the 2014 Residential Financing market evaluation based on the information and feedback collected from the partner and participants.

AI summary This section presents the findings of the 2014 Residential Financing market evaluation based on information and feedback collected from partners and participants.

4.1 Partner Perspectives An interview with the partner bank was conducted as part of the Residential Financing evaluation. The financing partner spoke highly of its relationship with ENSC staff (rating of 9 on a 10-point satisfaction scale...

AI summary The financing partner expressed overall satisfaction with ENSC's communication and collaboration in the Residential Financing program, though marketing efforts received the lowest satisfaction score. The partner supported considering a low-interest loan with a rebate as an alternative to the current zero-percent rate, while participants preferred the current option.

4.2.2 Loan Option Preference When asked about the most important factor that they considered when choosing a loan (the interest rate, the loan period, or the monthly payment amount), most of the participants interviewed mentioned the total...

AI summary Most participants in the study prioritized the total cost of a loan over individual factors like interest rate, loan period, or monthly payments. They strongly preferred zero-percent interest loans over low-interest loans with rebates unless the overall cost was equal or monthly budgeting was an issue. The small difference in monthly payments between the two options did not influence their preference.

4.2.3 Satisfaction with the Financing Option and ENSC Overall, the level of satisfaction with the ENSC financing option was high. In fact, nine of 10 participants gave the full satisfaction rating on a 5-point scale, while one participant...

AI summary Participants expressed high satisfaction with the ENSC financing option, particularly praising the no-cost financing and the efficiency and kindness of ENSC staff. Most issues were related to program scope and delivery, not the financing itself. A few issues with loan disbursement were resolved to participants' satisfaction.

4.2.4 Satisfaction with Financing Information, Forms and Communications Participants recalled receiving limited information regarding the financing option. Very few participants received printed materials from ENSC prior to applying for fi...

AI summary Participants received limited financing information from ENSC prior to application, but were satisfied with the clarity of forms and assistance provided. Most had minimal communication during the process, though some recommended clearer timelines and status updates to avoid confusion.

4.2.5 Satisfaction with Speed of Financing Processing and Loan Distribution For the most part, participants were highly satisfied with the speed at which their application was pre-approved. In fact, many mentioned that the process took bet...

AI summary Participants were generally satisfied with the speed of financing processing and loan distribution, with most applications pre-approved quickly. Only a few instances of delays were reported, and issues were resolved by ENSC. Delays in loan disbursement to contractors were noted but addressed.

4.2.6 Recommendations for Improvement Recommendations for improving the financing option primarily entailed increasing awareness among the general public, and not just among program participants; establishing a formal communications timeli...

AI summary The recommendations for improving the financing option focus on increasing public awareness, establishing a formal communication timeline for the application review and loan disbursement process, and expanding the range of eligible home improvements and the loan amounts available.

CONCLUSION The 2014 evaluation of Residential Financing demonstrated that this pilot was designed in accordance with most of the process-related recommendations made by the Evaluator since the 2011 evaluation. Residential Financing has a p...

AI summary The 2014 evaluation of Residential Financing found that the program was well-designed and effective in helping participants complete home upgrades, with a zero-percent interest rate being the most compelling motivator. Participants expressed high satisfaction with the financing process, but recommended broader promotion and clearer communication timelines.

This Appendix presents all recommendations made by the Evaluator throughout this report as well as the sections from which the recommendations originated. Sections Recommendations Executive Summary 1 Incorporate the financing option into e...

AI summary The Evaluator recommends integrating the Residential Financing option into existing program components like Green Heat, Solar, and Home Energy Assessment, rather than maintaining it as a separate program component, to avoid misleading implications.

Please indicate your company name. - QA1a. How would you describe your role(s) as an Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) partner for the Financing program? - QA1b. How long have you personally been involved in this role (specify mont...

AI summary The text includes questions asking a respondent to describe their role as an Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) partner for the Financing program and the duration of their involvement in this role.

QB1. On a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is very poor and 10 is excellent, please rate your satisfaction in regard to the following aspects of the Financing program. Aspects of the program Score 1 = very poor 10 = excellent NA = not applicabl...

AI summary The text presents a survey question asking respondents to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of the Financing program, including their relationship with ENSC staff, timeliness of communications, reporting requirements, credit application submissions, and program marketing and outreach activities.

QB1a. What difficulties, if any, have you encountered this year in your work on the Financing program? QB1b. How, if at all, have you addressed those challenges? QB1c. How, if at all, should ENSC help you address challenges you experienced...

AI summary The document contains a questionnaire about challenges faced in the Financing program, opportunities for input, and suggestions for improving the program. It includes questions about the type of loans offered, such as zero percent interest loans versus low-interest loans combined with rebates, and asks for feedback on how to improve the program's performance.

Part B: Program Assessment I am now interested in understanding your experience from the time you applied for financing up until now or to the time when your loan was paid back in full. - QB1. Using a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means not a...

AI summary The text outlines a series of questions aimed at assessing customer satisfaction with a zero percent financing option, focusing on the experience from application to loan repayment. It includes rating scales and open-ended questions to gather detailed feedback.

Factor a. Rating b. Explanation i. The financing application form and other paperwork you had to fill out ii. Interactions with Efficiency Nova Scotia staff iii. Information provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia regarding the financing option...

AI summary The text outlines factors related to the customer experience with Efficiency Nova Scotia and the bank during the financing process, including paperwork, interactions, communication, and processing speed. It also includes a question about communications received during the loan process.

Part C: Loan Incentive - QC1. If you had not received the financing from Efficiency Nova Scotia, would you have paid yourself for the full cost of the energy efficiency measures you implemented in your home? Why? - QC2. There are discussio...

AI summary This section discusses the Loan Incentive component of a program, asking participants whether they would have financed energy efficiency upgrades themselves without the loan and exploring preferences between zero percent interest loans and low-interest loans combined with rebates.

BER Instant Rebates Product Types - › CEE electronic ballasts › LED high bay fixtures - › CEE T8 lamps › LED troffer - › Wall pack induction lamp fixtures › LED strip lighting - › LED decorative walkways › T5 high bay fixtures - › High bay...

AI summary The BER Instant Rebates program offers rebates for various energy-efficient lighting products, aiming to achieve 27.0 GWh of energy savings and 4.8 MW of peak demand savings in 2014. The product types include LED and induction lighting solutions.

BER Mail-in Measure Categories - › Agricultural technologies › Commercial laundry - › Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) › Motors and variable speed drives (VSDs) - › Commercial lighting › Commercial kitchen - › Commercial re...

AI summary The BER Mail-in Measure Categories outline eligible technologies for rebates, including HVAC, lighting, and commercial equipment. Some lighting products, such as LED tubes, had increased rebate amounts during a promotional period in 2014, tracked separately as 'Promotional Rebate'.

BER Instant Rebates Product Types - › CEE T8 lamps › LED troffer - › Wall pack induction lamp fixtures › LED strip lighting - › LED decorative walkways › T5 high bay fixtures - › CEE electronic ballasts › LED high bay fixtures - › High bay...

AI summary The BER Instant Rebates Product Types include various lighting products such as LED troffers, LED strip lighting, and T5 high bay fixtures. These products are now submitted under BER, which aimed for 27.0 GWh of electricity savings and 4.8 MW of peak demand savings in 2014. Energy savings are accounted for under the BNI Efficient Products Rebates.

2.2.5 Project Review and On-site Visits In the fall of 2014, 70 on-site visits were conducted at the facilities of participants who applied for BER Mail-in. These visits were conducted by Equilibrium. However, 12 visits were removed from t...

AI summary In 2014, 70 on-site visits were conducted by Equilibrium to validate BER Mail-in project implementations. Twelve visits were excluded from the sample, including five where verification was not yet completed and seven involving ECMs with recurring quality issues. The visits aimed to ensure proper implementation and verify operational data and equipment characteristics to adjust savings calculations.

3.1 Participation in BER In 2014, BER had a total of 296 participants, compared to 270 in 2013, 175 in 2012 and 106 in 2011. These 296 participants included 98 participants in the promotional rebate on LED tubes for fluorescent fixtures, w...

AI summary BER participation increased in 2014 due to a promotional rebate on LED tubes, but regular participation declined slightly, partly because some ECM projects were removed from the tracking system due to quality issues.

asing participant burden and making the participation process more difficult. Requiring participants to provide photographs of the products to replace would also require them to have a digital camera. Two recommendations were only partiall...

AI summary The 2012 recommendations for improving the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program were only partially implemented. A reference table for wattage values was created in 2014, but it lacks some necessary reference values for verification. Additionally, changes to the BER Instant Rebates calculation methods from 2012-2013 have not been fully updated in recent years.

2013 Executive Summary Recommendations Six of the seven recommendations were either implemented by ENSC or are in the process of being implemented. In acting on these recommendations, ENSC collaborated more closely with distributors and re...

AI summary In 2013, ENSC implemented or began implementing six of seven recommendations from an executive summary. Issues arose with rebate structures, leading to distributor losses and tension, which was later resolved. ENSC relaxed rebate processing requirements and joined the DLC, improving procedures. However, malfunctioning equipment and lack of contractor reporting led to program issues and the contractor's suspension from BER.

BER Instant Rebates BER Instant Rebates is currently not managed through the DSMDS on a day-to-day basis, which means the Evaluator reviewed the compilation of all the products sold at each participating distributor in the Excel sheet prov...

AI summary The BER Instant Rebates program is not managed through the DSMDS, leading to manual review of Excel data provided by ENSC. The Masterlist and Reporting tabs in the Excel sheet contain product details and savings equations, allowing accurate calculation of discrepancies in savings. However, manual verification remains necessary due to a lack of automated validation tools.

Table 8: Reasons for Participating 2012 2014 Motivations Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Sample Size 56 56 27 27 Save on energy costs/bills 55% 32% 59% 2...

AI summary Table 8 presents data on participants' motivations for joining energy efficiency programs in 2012 and 2014. The primary motivation was saving on energy costs, with a significant decline in the percentage of participants citing this reason over time. Other motivations included taking advantage of program incentives, updating equipment, and environmental concerns.

Table 9: Satisfaction with BER Satisfaction with BER 2012 2 2014 Aspect of BER Sample Size % Satisfied Sample Size % Satisfied Interactions and communications with contractors, distributors or consultants 56 91% 25 88% Program overall 56 9...

AI summary Table 9 presents customer satisfaction data for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program in 2012 and 2014. The data highlights high levels of satisfaction across various aspects, including interactions with contractors, rebate amounts, and program application processes, though satisfaction slightly decreases in 2014 for some categories.

5 IMPACT EVALUATION FOR BER MAIL-IN The objective of the 2014 impact evaluation for BER Mail-in was to determine the gross and net energy savings. Both electrical energy and peak demand savings were estimated by analyzing the following par...

AI summary The 2014 impact evaluation for BER Mail-in aimed to assess gross and net energy savings by analyzing parameters such as installation rates, equipment features, and load factors. Interactive effects were considered for lighting measures but not for others. Adjustments and diversity factors were established based on documentation and on-site visits.

5.1 Gross Savings In 2014, the BER Mail-In tracking sheet contained a total of 446 projects implemented by 198 participants across 10 different measure categories. In addition to the regular measure categories, 137 projects with promotiona...

AI summary In 2014, the BER Mail-In tracking sheet reported 446 projects by 198 participants. However, 22 projects were removed from the evaluation due to issues with a specific contractor, including premature ECM failures and poor customer service. The Evaluator used on-site visits and the '2014 BER – Measure Equations Tool' to review ENSC's gross savings estimates.

therefore this adjustment was not included in this category's adjustment ratio. The capacity and COP of heat pumps at -15°C should be taken into account for tracked peak demand savings in the future. Among the 13 projects, 11 were used to...

AI summary The adjustment ratios for tracked energy and demand savings were established at 1.098 and 1.405, respectively, based on 11 projects. Two projects were excluded as outliers. The capacity and COP of heat pumps at -15°C were noted for future consideration in tracked peak demand savings.

5.1.2 Commercial Lighting Measures A total of 25 on-site visits were conducted for the lighting measures category; however, as mentioned above, three projects were eliminated from the data analysis because they were incomplete at the time...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of commercial lighting measures, including on-site visits, adjustments to tracked savings, and the impact of ballast factors on energy savings calculations. Over 80% of projects involved LED measures, and the evaluation highlights the importance of considering ballast factors in calculating energy savings.

5.1.5 Compressed Air Measures The compressed air measure category was evaluated by conducting four on-site visits. Adjustments were made to the tracked energy and demand savings of three of the four projects. Similar to 2013, the hours of...

AI summary The compressed air measure category was evaluated through four on-site visits, leading to adjustments in energy and demand savings for three of the four projects. Adjustments were made due to differences in hours of operation and airflow values, resulting in a 7.1% decrease in total energy savings and a 6.1% decrease in total demand savings.

5.1.6 Agricultural Measures The agricultural measure category was evaluated by conducting five on-site visits in 2014. The number of cows was decreased for two of the projects. For one project, the reduction was made because the number of...

AI summary The agricultural measure category was evaluated through five on-site visits in 2014, leading to several adjustments in energy and demand savings calculations. Issues included incorrect cow numbers, discrepancies in VSD installations, and algorithmic errors. The overall energy savings were reduced by 7.8%, and demand savings by 8.6%, due to these adjustments.

5.1.10 Solar Measures One solar thermal project was implemented in 2014. The RETScreen ® file provided for the project indicated a 50 percent occupancy rate. The participant declared that the building would be utilized all year round this...

AI summary A solar thermal project implemented in 2014 had its energy savings adjusted based on occupancy rate changes. The Evaluator adjusted the occupancy rate from 50% to 100%, increasing tracked energy savings from 0.004 GWh to 0.005 GWh, while demand savings remained unchanged at 0.008 MW.

Table 12: Diversity Factors for BER Mail-in Category of Measure Diversity Factor HVAC 98% Commercial Lighting 84% Commercial Refrigeration 84% Motors and VSDs 72% Compressed Air 39% Agricultural 80% Commercial Kitchen 96% Water Heating 100...

AI summary Table 12 outlines diversity factors for various energy efficiency measures under the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, indicating the percentage of diversity each measure contributes to the overall program.

5.3 Net Savings The net savings for BER Mail-in were estimated using the NTGR. Since interactive effects were already included in the gross savings calculations of the lighting projects, no other factor had to be applied. The following equ...

AI summary The net savings for the BER Mail-in program were calculated using the NTGR, with results showing total energy and peak demand savings for 2013 at both the meter and generator levels.

Table 14: Evaluation Results – Revised Net Savings – BER Mail-in Category of Measure HVAC Lighting Refrige ration Motors and VSDs Compressed Air Agricultural Energy Savings Total Gross Energy Savings – at Meter (GWh) 3.013 4.786 0.128 1.26...

AI summary Table 14 presents evaluation results for the Revised Net Savings from the BER Mail-in program, detailing energy and peak demand savings across various categories of measures, including HVAC, Lighting, and Compressed Air, with calculations involving Net-to-Gross Ratio and Line Loss Factor.

6.1 Gross Savings This section presents the tracked and revised savings for each product category rebated under BER Instant Rebates. This year, the Evaluator reviewed the consistency of hours of operation and equations used for all the pro...

AI summary This section discusses the evaluation of gross savings for BER Instant Rebates, noting revisions to baseline wattage for T8 lamps and CEE-listed ballasts based on Canadian regulations. The Evaluator recommends improving energy savings equations and monitoring market changes due to upcoming regulatory amendments.

Revised Savings The types of T8 products sold through BER Instant Rebates are identical to last year's products. Therefore, the Evaluator considers the displaced wattages to be valid for this year. As no new metering activity was conducted...

AI summary The document discusses the unchanged product types and savings calculations for T8 products under the BER Instant Rebates program. It notes the need to monitor market changes, as more efficient products like LED T8 lamps may shift the baseline. This trend is already evident in on-site visits for BER and BES programs.

Table 17: Unitary Savings Values for High-performance Ballasts Type of Ballast Demand Savings (W) Hours of Operation (hrs/year) Energy Savings (kWh/year) 1-lamp ballast 13.46 3,400 45.76 2-lamp ballast 13.46 3,400 45.76 3-lamp ballast 24.3...

AI summary Table 17 presents unitary savings values for high-performance ballasts, including demand savings, hours of operation, and energy savings per year for different types of ballasts. The table includes 1-lamp, 2-lamp, 3-lamp, and 4-lamp ballasts with corresponding energy savings values.

Similar to previous years' evaluations, the revised displaced wattage for each ballast type was calculated using the proportion of each type of T8 lamp accounted for in the total sales through the BER Instant Rebate initiative. The baselin...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of revised displaced wattage for T8 lamp ballasts using data from the BER Instant Rebate initiative. It notes that baseline wattage values from 2012 remain valid based on Canadian regulations, but ENSC should monitor future efficiency standard changes and adjust the baseline if needed.

Table 18: Revised Displaced Wattages for Each Ballast Type New Ballast and Lamp Systems Baseline Wattage New Wattage Lamp ΔW Ballast ΔW Proportion of T8 Lamps Average Ballast ΔW 1-lamp ballast with HP-T8-32 W lamp 43 27 2 14 61.4% 1-lamp b...

AI summary Table 18 presents revised displaced wattages for various ballast and lamp systems. The data includes baseline and new wattage values, differences in lamp and ballast wattages, and the proportion of T8 lamps. The table is used to calculate revised unitary savings values for 2014, using the same annual hours of operation as in 2013.

Table 19: Revised Unitary Savings Values for High-performance Ballasts Type of Ballast Demand Savings (W) Hours of Operation (hrs/year) Energy Savings (kWh/year) 1-lamp ballast 13.61 3,400 46.27 2-lamp ballast 13.61 3,400 46.27 3-lamp ball...

AI summary Table 19 presents revised unitary savings values for high-performance ballasts, detailing demand savings, hours of operation, and energy savings for different types of ballasts.

Tracked Savings The induction technologies eligible for rebates this year included: induction wall packs and high bay fixtures. The tracked savings for each type of induction lighting product were determined based on the difference between...

AI summary The document outlines eligible induction lighting technologies for rebates and explains how tracked savings are calculated based on wattage differences and annual operating hours. These values have remained consistent since 2013, indicating no changes in the savings calculation methodology.

6.1.8 Electronically Commutated Motors ENSC discontinued offering this product in 2014, but some motors purchased in 2013 were returned to the distributors in 2014. As a result, last year, the unitary savings of 954 kWh and 109 W were appl...

AI summary ENSC discontinued offering Electronically Commutated Motors in 2014, but some motors purchased in 2013 were returned in 2014. This led to unitary savings of 954 kWh and 109 W being applied to account for negative savings to BER Instant Rebates in 2014.

6.2 Interactive Effects As in past year's evaluations, the Evaluator based the calculation of the interactive effects on a study conducted in 1992 by ADS for Hydro-Québec. The interactive effects factor is calculated by using a weighted pr...

AI summary The evaluation of interactive effects for BER Instant Rebates uses data from the 2014 BES onsite visits, showing a decrease in the interactive effects factor from -13.0% in 2013 to -5.6% in 2014, due to increased air conditioning and non-electric heating in buildings.

Table 24: NTGRs for BER Instant Rebates Product NTGR LED downlights 0.65 LED Outdoor wallpacks 0.71 T5-T8 high bay fixtures 0.54 For the other products sold through the instant rebate approach, an NTGR of 1.0 was used.

AI summary Table 24 outlines the Net Total Gross Revenues (NTGR) for various products under the BER Instant Rebates program, with specific NTGR values assigned to LED downlights, LED Outdoor wallpacks, and T5-T8 high bay fixtures, and an NTGR of 1.0 applied to other products sold through the instant rebate approach.

6.4 Net Savings Net energy savings for BER Instant Rebates were estimated by adding the interactive effects and the NTGR to the gross energy savings using the following equation: Net energy savings = Gross energy savings × (1 + Interactive...

AI summary The document explains how net energy savings for BER Instant Rebates were calculated using an equation that incorporates gross energy savings, interactive effects, and NTGR. The total net energy and peak demand savings were calculated separately for each product and totaled 12.687 GWh and 3.002 MW at the meter, and 13.537 GWh and 3.203 MW at the generator.

7 OVERALL BER RESULTS This section summarizes the overall results of the impact evaluation of BER. With combined net savings generated from both the mail-in rebate and the instant rebate approaches, the total energy and peak demand savings...

AI summary The impact evaluation of the BER program shows that combined net savings from both mail-in and instant rebate approaches resulted in 24.610 GWh of energy savings and 4.880 MW of peak demand savings.

Table 28: Overall Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator for BER Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 3...

AI summary Table 28 compares tracked and evaluated savings from the BER program, showing discrepancies between initial and adjusted gross savings for energy and peak demand. The table highlights the impact of interactive effects and NTGR on net savings, with evaluation results differing from tracked savings.

ASK IF T5 AND T8 HIGH BAY FIXTURES WERE REBATED THROUGH THE PROGRAM amounted to products. I have a few questions about your sales of T5 and T8 high bay fixtures that are promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program. Our records indicate...

AI summary The text asks whether T5 and T8 high bay fixtures were rebated through the Business Energy Rebates Program, inquiring about sales trends, the impact of the program's incentives, and potential differences in sales with or without the program.

ASK IF LED DOWNLIGHTS WERE REBATED THROUGH THE PROGRAM I have a few questions about your sales of LED downlights that are promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program. LED downlights include LED screw-in lamps, LED pin-based lamps, LED...

AI summary The text asks whether LED downlights were rebated through the Business Energy Rebates Program, inquiring about sales trends, the impact of the program on sales, and the percentage of sales attributed to residential users. It also explores the potential effect of removing the incentive on sales.

Yes S4. Finally, do you have any suggestions to improve the program? No S2. The program support and communications S3. The rebate processing, tracking and reporting S1. The overall program Aspects of the program a. Score b. Reason Please s...

AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, focusing on customer satisfaction, program effectiveness, and the influence of incentives on product choices. Respondents are asked about their satisfaction with various aspects of the program, the adequacy of incentives, and the impact of the program on customer behavior.

[INTRODUCTION] Hello, I am with CRA (Corporate Research Associates), and we are performing an evaluation of energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Our records indicate that you or your firm recently part...

AI summary CRA is conducting an evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Business Energy Rebates Program and is reaching out to participants for feedback. The survey aims to help improve the program and will take about fifteen minutes to complete.

Satisfaction [S series] - S1. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1='not at all satisfied' and 5='very satisfied', how was your company or organization's experience with each OF THE FOLLOWING aspects of the Business Energy Rebates Program? If your...

AI summary The text outlines a survey assessing satisfaction with the Business Energy Rebates Program, focusing on aspects such as application processes, eligibility confirmation, rebate amounts, and overall program experience. It includes rating scales and open-ended questions for feedback on challenges and recommendations.

S10. Thinking of when you completed and sent your post-install mail-in rebate application to ENSC, how long, in weeks, was it before you received your mail-in rebate? Length of Time to Receive Rebate 2014 (#) Sample Size 17 3-4 weeks 7 5-8...

AI summary The text presents survey data on the time taken to receive mail-in rebates from ENSC, the likelihood of future energy-efficient product purchases, and barriers faced in implementing energy-efficient measures. It includes statistics from 2012 and 2014, with sample sizes and percentages provided.

Suggestions to Improve BER 2012 2014 Sample Size 56 27 Provide more information/information sessions 11% 7% Better marketing/awareness 11% 7% Offer more products rebated 7% 7% Better communication - 7% Increase/better rebates - 4% Make for...

AI summary The document presents data from surveys conducted in 2012 and 2014 regarding suggestions to improve the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. The majority of respondents in both years indicated no recommendations or that they did not know, with a small percentage suggesting improvements like better marketing, increased rebates, and more user-friendly forms.

FR2d. DO NOT POSE FR2d IF DON'T KNOW OR REFUSED IN Q.FR2c You indicated in your response to a previous question that if the Business Energy Rebates Program had not been available there was an [FR2c] in 10 likelihood that you would have ins...

AI summary The text includes questions from a regulatory proceeding related to the Business Energy Rebates Program, asking respondents about the timing of equipment installation without the rebate and whether they would have paid for energy-efficient measures without the rebate.

- S5. Now, using the same 10 point scale, how satisfied are you with Efficiency Nova Scotia's overall performance in working with your business? Satisfaction with Overall 2012 2013 2014 Satisfaction with Overall Performance Sample Size Sat...

AI summary The text presents survey results measuring satisfaction with Efficiency Nova Scotia's performance in working with businesses, including aspects like responsiveness, technical expertise, and the value of the Business Energy Rebates program. The data shows consistently high satisfaction levels across multiple years.

Would Participate in Other ENSC Programs 2012 (%) 2013 (%) 2014 (%) Sample Size 30 78 68 Definitely 77% 72% 81% Probably 23% 23% 19% Probably not - 3% - Definitely not - 3% - Don't know/refused have been removed from calculations Source: 2...

AI summary The text presents survey data from 2012 to 2014 on participation in ENSC programs and factors influencing the implementation of energy-efficient measures through the Business Energy Rebates Program. It highlights high participation rates and the importance of ENSC rebates as a key factor in decision-making.

Sampling Methodology A total of 70 on-site visits were conducted to evaluate BER Mail-In15. The sampling plan was developed on the basis of the September 2014 tracking sheet, which included all projects to date. The tracking sheet containe...

AI summary A sampling methodology involving 70 on-site visits was used to evaluate BER Mail-In15. The plan was based on a September 2014 tracking sheet containing 246 projects, 196 of which were completed. The tracking sheet was used to determine the percentage of tracked savings by measure category.

FR2a. If your company had not participated in BER, what is the likelihood that you would have installed exactly the same energy-efficient equipment that you installed through the program? (Scale 0 to 10) IF Pre-FR3 = Yes: FR2a = (Answer x...

AI summary The text outlines a set of questions and formulas used to calculate a PA1 score related to the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. It assesses the likelihood that a company would have installed energy-efficient equipment without the program and how the score is calculated based on responses.

Evaluation Report The Evaluation Report tab contains the most information, and is similar in scope to the 2013 tracking sheet used by ENSC. Information contained in this tab includes: project ID, project status, ENSC project owner, partici...

AI summary The Evaluation Report provides detailed tracking of energy and peak demand savings, including project IDs, participant contact information, and incentive payments. However, it lacks line loss factors and Nova Scotia Power rate codes, making it difficult to calculate savings at the meter. The report also notes that adding facility contact information has improved on-site coordination and evaluation processes.

Table 5: Sources of Awareness Sources of Awareness 2012 (%) 2013 (%) 2014 (#) Sample Size 27 29 11 Internet/ENSC website 7% 14% 4 Energy manager - - 2 ENSC staff/Someone at ENSC contacted the business 19% 31% 1 Word of mouth: someone in pr...

AI summary Table 5 shows the sources of awareness for energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia from 2012 to 2014. The primary source was through third-party contractors, followed by ENSC staff and word of mouth. The data highlights the role of different channels in spreading awareness about energy efficiency initiatives.

Table 6: Factors Influencing Participants' Decisions Importance of Factors in Influencing Decision 20 12 2013 2014 to Implement Energy Efficiency Measures Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Mean (0=Not at all important, 10=...

AI summary Table 6 outlines the importance of various factors influencing participants' decisions to implement energy efficiency measures. Financial incentives and on-bill financing are highly valued, while previous experience with programs and technical assistance are also significant considerations.

6.2.1 Validated Gross Savings As explained in previous sections, the Evaluator did not make adjustments to the gross savings value reported by ENSC. The tracked gross energy savings values reported by ENSC are summarized in the table below...

AI summary The Evaluator did not adjust the gross savings values reported by ENSC, as explained in previous sections. Tracked gross energy savings values are summarized in a table, with no demand savings claimed for either of the two components.

financing to help the implementation of energy-saving projects. If your company or organization had not received the financial incentives and/or on-bill financing from Efficiency Nova Scotia, would you have paid and/or financed the full co...

AI summary The text discusses the role of financing and incentives in the implementation of energy-saving projects, specifically referencing Efficiency Nova Scotia's financial support and on-bill financing options.

Parties Responsible for Specifying Measures 2012 (%) 2013 (%) 2014 (#) Sample Size 27 29 11 Outside design professional 15% 31% 4 Someone within the organization 30% 21% 3 Utility account manager 4% 3% 2 Contractor 33% 17% 1 Manufacturer r...

AI summary The document presents data on the parties responsible for specifying energy efficiency measures from 2012 to 2014, along with the importance of various factors influencing the implementation of energy efficiency measures through a program. The data includes percentages and sample sizes for different groups and ratings on a scale from 0 to 10 for the importance of factors such as financial incentives, technical assistance, and corporate policies.

APPENDIX VI CALCULATION EXAMPLE This appendix describes the step-by-step calculations that have produced the results for one of the projects in the 2014 Custom Retrofit impact evaluation. The algorithm described concerns the adjustments ma...

AI summary This appendix outlines a calculation example for a 2014 Custom Retrofit impact evaluation, focusing on adjustments made to a lighting project. It describes the equations used for savings calculations, the tracked savings claimed by ENSC, and the project-specific adjustment ratio established during the evaluation.

2014 Custom NC-R1. Gather more data to conduct a conclusive calibration billing analysis in 2015. Despite the fact that 23 projects were completed in 2012 and 2013, it was only possible to obtain sufficient energy billing data for seven pr...

AI summary The document discusses the need for more data to conduct a conclusive calibration billing analysis, the adoption of the NECB 2011 as a baseline for new projects, and the explanation of diversity factor values used in peak demand savings calculations. Issues with data sufficiency and the need for improved evaluation practices are highlighted.

Evaluation Report The evaluation report tab contains general project information including project ID, project status, ENSC project owner, participant/facility contact information, verified energy/peak demand savings, incentive(s) paid, ve...

AI summary The evaluation report highlights missing information in ENSC's tracking reports, such as line loss factors and Nova Scotia Power rate codes, which hinder accurate calculation of project savings. It also notes improvements made in 2014, including adding facility contact details to aid coordination and evaluation.

g projects. As it would be beneficial to participant satisfaction, this information should be systematically given to customers during the installation process and should be part of ENSC's procedures. 2014 BES-R3. Eliminate adjustment of o...

AI summary The document discusses recommendations for improving participant satisfaction and ensuring accurate energy savings calculations. It suggests that ENSC should directly follow up with participants instead of relying on third-party contractors and recommends not adjusting operating hours for burnt-out lights, safety considerations, or delamping. It also calls for adding information about cooling systems and hot water heat pumps to the non-lighting measures tracking report.

Non-lighting Measures Tracking Report As for the other data captured in the non-lighting measures tracking report, the contact information has been entered for all the participants. The heating load hours have been set at 2,200 hours for a...

AI summary The Non-lighting Measures Tracking Report includes participant contact details, project information, and details about non-lighting measures such as heat pumps. The report lacks information on cooling systems, which limits accurate savings calculations. The Evaluator recommends adding cooling system data and developing a validation process for savings calculations.

Table 19: Evaluation of Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings Associated with RP&C Common Areas Measures (Other Products) Category of Product 12-Watt BR30 7-Watt MR16 LED Exit Lights Low-flow Faucet Aerator Low-flow Showerhe ad Low-flow Sho...

AI summary Table 19 presents an evaluation of gross energy and peak demand savings associated with RP&C common areas measures for various products, including LED lights, low-flow faucets, and pipe insulation. The table details the number of units installed, energy savings, and peak demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.

3.7.3 Unitary Savings Values In Amendment 11, NRCan has provided unitary savings values for integrated stereos, portable audio products, television, non-recording video players and recording video players. It has also estimated average uni...

AI summary Amendment 11 provides unitary savings values for various electronic products, including integrated stereos, portable audio products, and video players. Ecos did not provide specific market size data for clock radios, so they were grouped under 'integrated stereo.' The Econoler team followed a similar approach in their study.

Custom NTGR Custom Retrofit Unnamed: 1 Unnamed: 2 Unnamed: 3 Unnamed: 4 Unnamed: 5 Unnamed: 6 Unnamed: 7 Unnamed: 8 FR3. If your company had not received the financial incentives and/or on-bill financing from ENSC, would you have paid and/...

AI summary The document presents a table assessing the impact of financial incentives and technical assistance from Efficiency Nova Scotia on a company's decision to implement a custom retrofit project. It includes scores for factors influencing the decision, such as program incentives, technical assistance, and industry standards.

e Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-2 Page 1 of 7 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Enabling Strategies - DSM Portion 2012 2013 2014 ($k) ($k) ($k) Develop...

AI summary E1 (EfficiencyOne) submitted a non-confidential response to NSPI's information requests regarding the 2016-2018 EECA supply agreement (M06733), detailing Enabling Strategies expenses for DSM from 2012-2014, including development, education, outreach, and innovative financing costs.

Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-2 Page 4 of 7 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary The document references E1's (EfficiencyOne) responses to NSPI's (Nova Scotia Power Inc.) information requests regarding a 2016-2018 supply agreement under the Energy Efficiency Conservation Agreement (EECA), identified as matter M06733. It pertains to regulatory proceedings involving energy efficiency program management.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Also included under Education and Outreach are expenditures associated with advertising 2 and the Efficiency Nova Scotia website. Quantitative benefits have not been directly 3 linked to corporate advertising or the ENS...

AI summary The text discusses Education and Outreach expenditures, including advertising and ENS website metrics. Advertising recall increased from 57% (Q4 2012) to 74% (Q4 2014), while website visits rose 15% in 2014. Unaided awareness of ENSC grew from 16% to 37% between 2012–2014. PACE financing is highlighted as a quantifiable benefit for ENS Residential services from 2016–2018.

fiable benefit includes the cost of energy savings 24 achieved through the PACE offering in comparison to other financing and rebate models. 25 26 Quantifiable benefits associated with Capacity Building include improved engagement 27 with...

AI summary The text highlights the benefits of the PACE program in energy savings and the effectiveness of the ENS contractor list in improving engagement metrics, such as lower bounce rates and increased website interaction.

Other Enabling Strategies 0.9 3 Total 42.6 150.5 136.3 21.0 2.1 3.9 0.5 Currency is expressed in 2016 dollars. Columns may not add correctly, due to rounding. Annual avoided costs, calculated using ENSC’s DSM Potential Study at the Base Le...

AI summary The text outlines avoided costs, TRC, PAC, and RIM metrics for energy efficiency programs, referencing ENS's 2015 DSM Resource Plan Settlement Agreement and NSPI's data. It includes a 2016-2018 EECA supply agreement and E1's responses to NSPI information requests.

. As Nova Scotia installers gain Efficient Product Rebates (BNI) 2,320 experience with installation, installation costs are expected to decrease. ENERGY STAR® appliances, such as self-contained ice makers, for restaurants and commercial fo...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of installation experience on Efficient Product Rebates (BNI) for ENERGY STAR® appliances and LED Low Bay fixtures, noting cost reductions over time. It highlights the strategic importance of ENERGY STAR® branding and the role of DSM jurisdictions in promoting energy-efficient products.

Rebates (BNI) 48,468 jurisdictions supporting these products as a standard offering. ENS is one such jurisdiction. This measure serves to augment other energy efficiency measures LED Refrigeration Strip Lighting- offered for grocers. Groce...

AI summary The text discusses rebate programs for energy-efficient products, including LED refrigeration strip lighting for grocers and ground source heat pumps. It highlights the challenges of high installation costs and the potential for cost reduction through increased competition and promotion by ENS.

Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-11 Page 6 of 7 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 principles. This need not imply equal weighting of each goal, but explic...

AI summary This document contains responses from E1 to NSPI information requests related to the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA, filed under matter number M06733. It includes principles discussed in Appendix F, page 1.

ed. 27 28 (f) Please indicate if E1 considered equity between participants and non-participants in 29 the development of its recommended portfolio. If “yes”, please provide a detailed Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-12 Page 1 of 9...

AI summary The document requests E1 to indicate whether equity between participants and non-participants was considered in the development of its recommended portfolio. It references a 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter number M06733.

Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-12 Page 1 of 9 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 description of how equity between participants and non-participants...

AI summary The document outlines a request for information regarding the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for the Energy Efficiency Conservation Agreement (EECA M06733). It includes detailed queries about program eligibility, participation forecasts, cost ratios, incentive structures, and implementation budgets.

Base Low Mid High Program MWh MW $M MWh MW $M MWh MW $M MWh MW $M Efficient Products 61,957 9.0 17.8 18,036 1.9 7.7 72,891 10.4 18.6 76,859 11.0 19.6 Existing Homes 68,840 25.2 37.3 60,396 23.3 28.5 91,261 34.5 50.7 130,329 54.6 152.3 Ener...

AI summary The table presents program performance metrics across different scenarios (Base, Low, Mid, High) with data on energy savings in MWh, capacity in MW, and costs in $M for various energy efficiency programs. The data highlights the impact of different program levels on energy savings, capacity, and financial costs.

-0.000000137 12/31 24:00:00 0.000021918 0.000021781 -0.000000137 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary This document contains a portion of a regulatory proceeding related to an energy efficiency agreement and responses to information requests from NSPI. It includes a supply agreement and some numerical data.

ate Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-19 Page 1 of 3 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary This document pertains to the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter number M06733 (E-ENS-R-15), and includes responses from E1 to information requests by NSPI.

27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-19 Page 2 of 3 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary This document references a 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter number M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) and includes E1 responses to NSPI Information Requests.

Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-21 Page 2 of 3 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 g) Total project costs (estimate and actual): Project cost estimates and...

AI summary The document outlines E1's responses to NSPI information requests regarding the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA. Key points include the inability to provide aggregated data on project costs, incentive dollars, and various project dates, as this information is only available on a project-by-project basis. Payback periods are noted to range from two to eight years.

Attachment 1, filed electronically, for measure-level energy-savings details, found in column E. Investment dollars are a sum of measure-level investment in the EL- RAM. Please refer to EfficiencyOne's response to NSPI IR-10 Investment ($M...

AI summary The document includes an attachment with investment details related to energy-saving measures and references a 2016-2018 supply agreement for EECA M06733. It also mentions responses to information requests by NSPI.

0.0 Other Enabling Strategies 0.3 0.0 0.0 Enabling Strategies Subtotal 3.5 0.0 0.0 Total 39.0 121.2 21.2 a Currency is expressed in 2015 dollars. Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-24 Page 1 of 1 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M0...

AI summary The document references a 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter number M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) and includes responses to NSPI Information Requests. It also contains financial data in 2015 dollars.

Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-25 Page 1 of 2 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL Investment 2016-2018 Total ($ million)a Residential DSM Programs Effi...

AI summary The document outlines the investment amounts allocated to various energy efficiency programs by EECA from 2016 to 2018, including residential and business programs, with a total investment of $121.5 million.

trategies 2.2 Total 121.5 a Program totals may not add due to rounding Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-25 Page 2 of 2 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary The document references a 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) and includes responses from E1 to information requests by NSPI. The context involves regulatory proceedings and energy efficiency programs.

. by preparing a trained 28 workforce that will ultimately require fewer incentives to promote energy-saving 29 technologies, or by encouraging adoption of codes and standards that can eliminate the 30 need for incentives altogether), or r...

AI summary The text discusses opportunities for reducing the need for incentives in promoting energy-saving technologies, such as through workforce training, adoption of codes and standards, and identifying new technologies for future plans.

Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-36 Page 3 of 4 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests

AI summary This document, filed on March 27, 2015, contains E1's responses to NSPI information requests related to the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA under matter number M06733 (E-ENS-R-15).

Part Time 1 1 100.0% 2014 Casual (Temporary) 1 0 0.0% Total 94 11 11.7% Including On-Site Energy Managers Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-38 Page 1 of 1 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI I...

AI summary The document outlines a request and response related to labour cost information for EfficiencyOne and Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011 to 2018. The response directs the requestor to refer to EfficiencyOne’s response to another information request.

ate Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-40 Page 2 of 2 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-41: 2 3 Please provide the wage rate increases (actual an...

AI summary The document provides wage rate increases for E1 and ENS from 2011 to 2015, with increases determined annually based on market considerations. Future wage rate increases for 2016 through 2018 will follow EfficiencyOne’s Compensation Statement of Practice and Procedure.

0 230 Brownlow Avenue I Suite 300 I Dartmouth, NS I B3B OGS 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-43: 2 3 Please provide copies of all studies, docum...

AI summary The document outlines responses to information requests regarding compensation benchmarks for ENS and E1 from 2011 to the present. Attachments 1 and 2 are referenced as confidential, and E1 and ENSC state they have not conducted benchmarking for overall labour costs.

5.7 2014 Actual 801 1 802 5.9 2015 Budget 790 1 791 5.6 Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-44 Page 1 of 1 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA M06733 (E-ENS-R-15) E1 Responses to NSPI Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-...

AI summary The document provides a response to an information request regarding employee benefits for EfficiencyOne, noting that the company matches employee contributions for benefits such as medical, dental, and life insurance.

es to the programs."6 25 26 27 NS Power supports DSM that will help provide stable, predictable and affordable 28 electricity prices for Nova Scotians. NS Power does not support the plan proposed by 5 References to "Demand Side Management"...

AI summary NS Power supports a Demand Side Management (DSM) plan that provides stable and affordable electricity prices. They recommend a DSM expenditure of approximately $22 million per year, which aligns with the 'Low Case DSM' from Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2014 study and would allow NS Power to avoid adding new generation capacity until 2032.

5 As shown in these tables, the EfficiencyOne residential portfolio ranks 7th out of eight portfolios, and the non-residential portfolio ranks 5th 6 . 7 Table 3 provides the individual residential program costs in $/kWh 8 for 39 residentia...

AI summary The text discusses the ranking of EfficiencyOne's residential and non-residential portfolios, with the residential portfolio ranking 7th out of eight and the non-residential portfolio ranking 5th. It also references tables that provide program costs in \/kWh for residential and non-residential programs in 2013, including EfficiencyOne's proposed costs for 2016-2018.

1 Table 7. Summary of Scenario C (Company's Alternate Scenario) Impacts Cumulative Cost ($Millions) Peak Demand (MW) Cumulative (GWh) TRC Ratio Program Name E1 Case C % Diff. E1 Case C % Diff. E1 Case C % Diff. E1 Case C % Diff. RES‐Applia...

AI summary Table 7 presents the impacts of Scenario C, the company's alternate scenario, on various programs and enabling strategies. It shows cumulative costs, peak demand, and cumulative energy usage for different program categories, highlighting significant differences in cost and demand reductions compared to the baseline (E1). The TRC ratio also shows an increase in some cases.

1 Table 8. Summary of Scenario D Impacts Cumulative Cost ($Millions) Peak Demand (MW) Cumulative (GWh) TRC Ratio Program Name E1 Case D % Diff. E1 Case D % Diff. E1 Case D % Diff. E1 Case D % Diff. Efficient Products (Res) $ 7.83 $ ‐ 4.47...

AI summary Table 8 summarizes the impacts of Scenario D on various programs, showing reductions in cumulative costs, peak demand, and energy consumption compared to the baseline (E1). The table highlights the percentage differences in cost, demand, and energy usage across different programs, with overall reductions of up to 51% in cumulative costs and 25% in energy consumption.

- 22 Annual budget detail, including at least the following categories: 23 incentives (cash), incentives (free/discounted services), administration, 1 marketing, EM&V, QA/QC, application/incentive processing, IT, and 2 other implementation...

AI summary The text discusses the annual budget detail requirements for programs, including categories such as incentives and administrative services. It also addresses the adequacy of EfficiencyOne's proposed reporting, with the response indicating that the reporting is not sufficient.

(DSM) Potential Study, January 7, 2014. Verification Review of Program Year 2013 Evaluation Results – Report for the Nova Scotia Utilities and Review Board. H. Gil Peach, John Mitchell, June 5, 2013. 30 ITC = Input Tax Credit In 2014, Effi...

AI summary In 2014, Efficiency Nova Scotia's DSM portfolio exceeded energy savings targets while spending significantly less than planned. However, there were notable variances across different programs, which could impact electric system planning depending on the constraints and measure life of the savings.

42 Nova Scotia 2015 DSM Plan M06247 Decision BC Hydro Business Structure Crown Corporation DSM Funding Mechanism Deferred for future rate recovery Planned DSM Savings R, 16% I, 52% Population Served 4,631,302 Year DSM Started 1989, 200844...

AI summary The 2015 DSM Plan by BC Hydro outlines funding mechanisms, savings goals, and customer participation across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. It includes deferred rate recovery, savings targets, and various programs such as refrigerators buy-back, lighting incentives, and smart meter infrastructure.

51 Final Independent Report for the Saskatchewan Rate Review Panelon SaskPower's 2014Ͳ2016 Rate Plan, Forkast Consulting, 2014 Manitoba Hydro Business Structure Crown Corporation DSM Funding Mechanism Profits on export, rates targeted at c...

AI summary This document provides a summary of Manitoba Hydro's business structure, DSM funding mechanism, and energy efficiency programs. It includes data on customer numbers, DSM savings, utility sales, and DSM plan costs and savings. The document references a 2014 annual report and provides financial and operational metrics related to energy efficiency initiatives.

57 Manitoba Power 2013Ͳ2016 Power Smart Plan, OntarioͲIndependent Electricity System Operator (IESO) Business Structure "IESO works collaboratively with local distribution companies and other partners to deliver conservation programs throu...

AI summary The document outlines the Ontario Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) and its role in delivering conservation programs through a systems benefit charge. It details the IESO's business structure, DSM funding mechanisms, customer numbers, and energy efficiency programs. The 2015-2020 DSM plan is outlined with financial figures and savings targets.

69 Plan Gobal En Efficacity Energetique Budget 2015, http://publicsde.regieͲenergie.qc.ca/projets/282/DocPrj/RͲ3905Ͳ2014ͲBͲ 0038ͲDemandeͲPieceͲ2014_08_01.pdf, Accessed January 30, 2015 Efficiency New Brunswick Business Structure Crown Corp...

AI summary The document compares energy efficiency programs in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, focusing on the DSM funding mechanism, customer numbers, and efficiency targets. It highlights differences in program structures, funding, and performance metrics between the two regions.

MeasureLevel Results for Baseline E1 and Optimized Case D Scenarios Pro m T gra ype Sub ͲPro gra m Me asu re Mo del Bui ldin g T ype End Use Cat ego ry Sto ck T tme nt rea Dem and (kW ) Ene rgy (M Wh ) Tot l. Cos al I mp t ($ ) usin eba 1...

AI summary The document presents MeasureLevel results comparing baseline E1 and optimized Case D scenarios for energy efficiency programs, including demand-side management rebates and lighting controls in commercial office buildings. The data includes metrics such as demand (kW), energy (MWh), and total cost impact ($).

Sheet1 Unnamed: 0 Unnamed: 1 2016 Unnamed: 3 Unnamed: 4 Unnamed: 5 Unnamed: 6 Unnamed: 7 Unnamed: 8 Unnamed: 9 2017 Unnamed: 11 Unnamed: 12 Unnamed: 13 Unnamed: 14 Unnamed: 15 Unnamed: 16 Unnamed: 17 2018 Unnamed: 19 Unnamed: 20 Unnamed: 2...

AI summary The table presents financial data from 2016 to 2018, including total values and specific program expenditures such as Enabling Strategies, Education and Outreach, and Development and Research. These programs show varying levels of funding and associated percentages over the three-year period.

E1 Responses to NSPI Information Request (IR 35) Act ual Pro gra m Spe ndi ng inc lud ing ST Ful l H Act ual Pr ogr am Spe ndi wit h H ST ng Ad jus ted for IT Cs An l nua En erg y Sav ing s An l nua Dem and Red ion uct s Full HS T HS T a d...

AI summary This document provides a detailed table of actual program spending, energy savings, and demand savings from 2010 to 2018, including adjustments for HST and ITCs. The data reflects spending by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) for demand-side management (DSM) programs and their impact on energy efficiency and demand reduction.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-7: В Eliminate TRC's < 1.0 Allow implemention costs to vary +/- 20% Allow incentive costs to vary from the E1 minimum Participation is estimated as a function of program cost, with goal ~ Scen. A 381.7 60.5 $...

AI summary The table presents various proposals related to program costs, participation goals, and TRC ratios. It includes different scenarios for implementing energy efficiency programs and their associated costs, peak demand, and cumulative energy savings. The data reflects variations in program costs and their impact on TRC ratios.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-6: Reference: NS Power's Evidence, Page 28, lines 9-11. NS Power suggests that EfficiencyOne should adopt technology at a later date "rather than subsidize the market to force early transformation." Apart from t...

AI summary NS Power argues that EfficiencyOne should delay adopting new technology rather than subsidize early market transformation. It acknowledges that product incentives may be effective but suggests their level should be carefully assessed based on technology evolution and market uptake, using a hypothetical example of LED light bulb subsidies.

4 Figure 1.2 - 2016 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2016 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)" Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total...

AI summary Figure 1.2 presents the 2016 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, detailing program investments, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings across residential and non-residential sectors. It includes data on program costs, benefits, and savings metrics such as Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost (PAC).

Figure 1.4 - 2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment 2018 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)" Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Re...

AI summary Figure 1.4 outlines the 2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment, showing the investment amounts, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings for various programs. The table includes data on residential and non-residential programs, as well as enabling strategies, with figures expressed in 2018 dollars.

3 4 5 6 7 The BNI Efficient Product Rebates program provides financial incentives, through prescriptive rebates, on a wide variety of products to encourage BNI end-users to reduce electrical energy consumption and peak demand. Customers ar...

AI summary The BNI Efficient Product Rebates program offers prescriptive rebates for energy-efficient products to reduce electrical energy consumption and peak demand. Eligible customers include commercial, industrial, not-for-profit, and institutional entities. The program aims to raise awareness, encourage efficient product use, increase market penetration, and transform market practices.

30 1 will through Custom Efficient Rebates incentives the Incentives and Products programs 2 New be for measures but by available that qualify that are not supported the 3 Construction Program. 4 5 market The Custom Incentives program will...

AI summary The document outlines the continuation of the Custom Incentives program, which offers tailored energy efficiency solutions for various market segments. It includes retro-commissioning, compressed air optimization, energy management systems, onsite energy manager services, and employee engagement initiatives.

4.3.1 Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing 8 9 10 ENS recognizes a lack of upfront capital can be a barrier to customers adopting energy efficiency measures. For this reason, financing DSM activities is a complementary incentive...

AI summary ENS acknowledges upfront capital barriers to energy efficiency and supports financing DSM initiatives as complementary to rebates. Despite historically low participation rates (median <0.5% in 2011), ENS continues to enable municipal PACE programs, which use property taxes for energy upgrades. ENS provides tools for municipalities but does not directly administer PACE programs.

2016-2018 DSM Plan NS Power Closing Submission Appendix A Page 3 of 3 Memo to Nova Scotia Power July 6, 2015 Page 3 Finally, the research cited by E1 as supporting its process does not always appear to be sufficiently comprehensive (i.e.,...

AI summary NS Power criticizes the research provided by E1 as insufficient, outdated, and not comprehensive enough to support the incentive setting process for the 2016-2018 DSM Plan. The cited materials lack detailed analysis, particularly regarding non-residential incentive levels, and are not sufficient to justify the proposed E1 budget.

were applied as defined in the methodology. Also, in recommendation HER-R3, Econoler noted that past electricity consumption for the participant group and non-participant group should be analyzed to: help determine whether the savings obse...

AI summary The evaluation report of the 2014 DSM programs highlights that residential and business programs achieved energy and demand savings above their targets, though the Home Energy Report (HER) results were questioned. The report recommends analyzing past electricity consumption trends over five years to ensure savings attributed to HER are accurate. The actual expenditure was below the approved budget.

1 incentives through the Custom Incentives and Efficient Products Rebates programs will 2 be available for measures that qualify but that are not supported by the New 3 Construction Program. 4 5 The Custom Incentives program will continue...

AI summary The document outlines the continuation of the Custom Incentives and Efficient Products Rebates programs, which provide financial incentives for energy efficiency measures not supported by the New Construction Program. These programs include retro-commissioning, compressed air system optimization, EMIS, SEM, OEM services, and employee engagement initiatives.

4.3.1 Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing ENS recognizes a lack of upfront capital can be a barrier to customers adopting energy efficiency measures. For this reason, financing DSM activities is a complementary incentive struct...

AI summary ENS acknowledges upfront capital barriers hinder energy efficiency adoption and supports financing DSM activities as complementary incentives. Despite low historical participation rates in financing programs (median <0.5% in 2011), ENS will provide tools for municipalities to develop PACE programs, which allow property tax add-ons for energy upgrades. ENS's role is an Enabling Strategy, not direct program delivery.

1 incentives through the Custom Incentives and Efficient Products Rebates programs will 2 be available for measures that qualify but that are not supported by the New 3 Construction Program. 4 5 The Custom Incentives program will continue...

AI summary The Custom Incentives and Efficient Products Rebates programs will provide incentives for energy efficiency measures not supported by the New Construction Program. The Custom Incentives program will focus on tailored offerings such as retro-commissioning, EMIS, and SEM. The Direct Installation program allows small to medium businesses to access no-charge energy audits and financial incentives for energy-efficient upgrades, with options for interest-free financing.

4.3.1 Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing ENS recognizes a lack of upfront capital can be a barrier to customers adopting energy efficiency measures. For this reason, financing DSM activities is a complementary incentive struct...

AI summary ENS acknowledges that upfront capital barriers hinder energy efficiency adoption, so it supports financing DSM initiatives as complementary to rebates. Despite low historical participation (median <0.5% in 2011), ENS aids municipalities in developing PACE programs, enabling property tax-based financing for energy upgrades. ENS's role is an enabling strategy, not direct program delivery, with participants eligible for ENS programs.

Figure 1.4 - 2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment 2018 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total R...

AI summary Figure 1.4 from the 2018 DSM Resource Plan outlines investments and benefits for various energy efficiency programs, including residential and business initiatives. It highlights the financial and energy savings associated with these programs, along with metrics like the Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC).

1 incentives through the Custom Incentives and Efficient Products Rebates programs will 30 financial incentives for energy-efficient technologies. Changes to the program allow 1 customers to work with a contractor of their choice to implem...

AI summary The document discusses changes to energy efficiency programs, including the Custom Incentives and Efficient Products Rebates programs, allowing customers to choose their contractors and access a network of qualified contractors. The programs target small businesses and non-profits, offering incentives for energy-efficient technologies such as lighting, HVAC, and refrigeration equipment.

4.3.1 Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing ENS recognizes a lack of upfront capital can be a barrier to customers adopting energy efficiency measures. For this reason, financing DSM activities is a complementary incentive struct...

AI summary ENS acknowledges upfront capital barriers to energy efficiency and supports financing DSM activities as complementary incentives. Despite historically low participation rates in financing programs (median <0.5% in 2011), ENS continues to enable PACE programs via municipal partnerships, allowing tax-based repayment for energy upgrades. ENS's role is facilitative, not direct service provision, with PACE participants eligible for ENS programs.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: - 1. The Board approves a DSM Plan for 2016-2018 in the aggregate amount of $102,150,000 with a target of total cumulative energy savings of 405.9 GWh and demand savings of 62.5 MW. Approved spending is $33,210,0...

AI summary The Board approves a DSM Plan for 2016-2018 with a budget of $102.15 million and sets targets for energy and demand savings. It also approves a supply agreement, consensus agreement, and various filing requirements. The TRC test is maintained, and E1 is directed to explore alternate DSM budget scenarios and improve incentive determination processes.

Figure 1.3 - 2017 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2017 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)8 Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Re...

AI summary Figure 1.3 presents the 2017 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings, outlining investments, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings for various residential and business programs. The table includes program-specific data such as investment amounts, benefits, and cost tests.

27 3.1 Efficient Product Rebates (BNI) 1 2

AI summary The text references a table listing 'Efficient Product Rebates' under the BNI category, indicating a program related to energy efficiency incentives.

3 4 5 6 7 The BNI Efficient Product Rebates program provides financial incentives, through prescriptive rebates, on a wide variety of products to encourage BNI end-users to reduce electrical energy consumption and peak demand. Customers ar...

AI summary The BNI Efficient Product Rebates program offers prescriptive rebates for energy-efficient products to reduce electrical energy consumption and peak demand. Eligible customers can choose from a predefined list of measures, with rebates delivered via mail-in applications or discounts at the point of purchase. The program aims to raise awareness, encourage the use of efficient products, increase market penetration, and transform market practices.

30 1 will through Custom Efficient Rebates incentives the Incentives and Products programs 23 partners staff additional trade and building expertise through program training as 24 required. 25 26 3.3 Direct Installation 27 28 The program m...

AI summary The text describes the Direct Installation program, which assists small to medium-sized businesses in reducing energy consumption through no-charge energy audit services and financial incentives for energy-efficient technologies. The program also includes an Efficiency Partner Network that provides a list of qualified contractors for customers to choose from.

4.3.1 Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing 8 9 10 ENS recognizes a lack of upfront capital can be a barrier to customers adopting energy efficiency measures. For this reason, financing DSM activities is a complementary incentive...

AI summary ENS acknowledges upfront capital barriers to energy efficiency and supports financing DSM activities as a complement to rebates. Despite historically low participation in financing programs (median <0.5% in 2011), ENS continues supporting PACE programs administered by municipalities, acting as an Enabling Strategy rather than a direct service provider.

Business, non-profit and institutional programs - Efficient Product Rebates consists of both mail-in and point-of-purchase incentives. The Efficient Product Rebates program provides financial incentives through prescriptive rebates on a wi...

AI summary The document describes two key programs under business, non-profit, and institutional initiatives: Efficient Product Rebates and Custom Incentives. The Efficient Product Rebates program offers financial incentives for energy-efficient products, while the Custom Incentives program supports energy audits and technical changes in existing or new facilities to reduce energy consumption and peak demand.

Financing structures – comparable entities 348 349 We performed an industry scan to determine financing structures currently utilized by comparable entities (i.e., other independent energy efficiency entities) across Canada and the United...

AI summary The document discusses an industry scan of financing structures used by comparable energy efficiency entities in Canada and the United States, noting that no third-party debt was found in the identified organizations. EfficiencyOne in Canada and Energy Trust of Oregon, Inc., among others, are highlighted as examples of independent entities managing energy efficiency programs.

- Engineering, LLC, to administer Hawaii Energy. Hawaii Energy is a public benefits fund financed by a - surcharge on utility bills. The surcharge is based on a percentage of total utility revenue and funds a - number of clean energy incen...

AI summary The document discusses Hawaii Energy and Focus on Energy, both public benefits funds supporting clean energy programs. Hawaii Energy is funded by a surcharge on utility bills, while Focus on Energy is supported by Wisconsin utilities. However, external financial statements for both programs could not be located.

Proposed financing process and timeline 608 609 financing. We propose the following next steps and associated timeline in support of securing long term 667 h Consensus Agreement, 2016-2018 DSM Plan, dated June 16, 2015, entered into by 668...

AI summary The document outlines a proposed financing process and timeline, referencing various agreements, financial statements, and websites related to energy efficiency programs and entities involved in the process.

E1 is seeking long-term financing in the form of a committed term loan facility, with E1's annual principal and interest payment requirements being back-stopped with payments from NSPI to E1. Initially, E1 is looking to secure financing fo...

AI summary E1 is seeking long-term financing for energy efficiency investments through a committed term loan, with NSPI backing payments. The total investment for the first Supply Agreement (2016-2018) is estimated at $100M. E1 plans to finance subsequent instalments separately. Energy efficiency investments are expected to provide long-term benefits, and NSPI may recover costs over time aligned with benefits. E1 aims to secure financing at a lower cost than NSPI's WACC of approximately 7.78% (pre-tax) and 6.49% (after-tax).

James R. Gogan Direct Dial: (902) 563-5920 E-Mail: [email protected] File No. 41736-28 February 16, 2016 Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Attention: Doreen Friis, Regulatory Affai...

AI summary This document provides an update to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board regarding EfficiencyOne's efforts to secure long-term financing for its 2015 electricity efficiency and conservation activities. Grant Thornton has been engaged to assist with this process, and drafts of the 2015 Supply Agreement between EfficiencyOne and NSPI have been exchanged, though the agreement has not yet been executed.