HomeEnergy EfficiencyM11307Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Energy Efficiency" in M11307

Matter: P-884 - Nova Scotia Power Inc. - 2023 Evergreen  Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) -  Action Plan and Roadmap
63 passages 9 documents

Energy Efficiency across all matters →

N-1Evergreen IRP - Update to IRP Action Plan and Roadmap - 2023 1 passage
LOAD AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY p. pp. 12-13
LOAD AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY Figure 8 highlights the 26-year (NPVRR) with end effects by scenario and provides a comparison between scenarios to assess the impacts of the various load and energy efficiency assumptions modeled. The results de...

AI summary The text compares NPVRR outcomes across load and energy efficiency scenarios, noting Hybrid Peak (E2) cost savings vs. base load (E1), higher NPVs in Base Plus/Modified Mid DSM scenarios, and Accelerated Electrification's faster resource additions. NS Power highlights program cost gaps and system reserve margin considerations.

N-3Comments - Synapse 2 passages
1. No Atlantic Loop as Preferred Plan p. pp. 0-1
1. No Atlantic Loop as Preferred Plan The lowest cost 26-year NPVRR (including distributed solar PV costs and end effects) base model run under the "current policy and trends" electrification assumptions for Nova Scotia is the No Atlantic...

AI summary The No Atlantic Loop scenario (CE1-E1-R2) is identified as the lowest-cost 26-year NPVRR model under current electrification assumptions, costing $130 million less than the Atlantic Loop base model. A hybrid peak mitigation variant reduces costs further by $2.33 billion, while a bi-directional flow sensitivity model shows even lower costs but lacks contractual commitments with Quebec. Synapse supports reassessing these scenarios with clearer cost data.

Table 1. Modeling Scenario NPVRR Metrics p. p. 8
Table 1. Modeling Scenario NPVRR Metrics Scenario Info, All Scenarios Clean Energy Policy Electrification Trajectory Atlantic Loop Sensitivity Scenario Name NPVRR 2025$ NPV Solar 2025$ Effects NPVRR End Solar End Effects NPVRR w/EE + Solar...

AI summary The table presents NPVRR metrics for various modeling scenarios under the Clean Energy Policy, including electrification trajectory, carbon capture, hydrogen, and demand-side management. The scenarios compare NPVRR values and solar effects across different conditions, such as low and high fuel pricing, and modified DSM approaches.

N-4Report of John D. Wilson, Grid Strategies LLC and Paul L. Chernick, Resource Insig... 2 passages
2. Overview p. p. 0
page-0-3) Id. , p. 5. [ 3 ](#page-0-5) The filing does menfion an expected filing date of 2024, but ACE plan expected filing dates are rarely reliable indicafions of progress. Id., p. 14. However, it is not clear whether those supplemental...

AI summary The text critiques the reliability of the ACE plan's 2024 filing date and highlights complexities in supplemental heating systems, including customer costs, carbon emissions from backup fuels, and the need for urgent policy solutions like rate design and incentives from NS Power, E1, or the Province.

A. Hybrid Peak Mifigafion p. pp. 0-2
A. Hybrid Peak Mifigafion Our comments on the final model results noted the inconsistency between the modeling approaches for the costs of customer-owned solar and customer-owned oil/gas heafing systems. NS Power acknowledges that "incorpo...

AI summary The text highlights inconsistencies in modeling customer-owned solar and fossil-fueled heating systems, urging NS Power to address non-peak usage in hybrid peak strategies. It references Eastward Energy's commitment to a provincial study and the 2022 Public Utilities Act revision assigning Efficiency One to strategic electrification programs. A multi-sector study is proposed to evaluate heating options, involving stakeholders like NS Power, Efficiency Nova Scotia, and propane/fuel oil suppliers, with a focus on tradeoff standards and customer behavior shifts.

N-5Reply Submission - NSPI 3 passages
Section 33 p. p. 11
We also pointed to the commitment by Eastward Energy Inc. in its recently approved rate case setlement to engage at the provincial level on a study of this issue. The 2022 revision to the Public U�li�es Act has also charged Efficiency One...

AI summary The text discusses the need for a multi-sector study on strategic electrification, highlighting Eastward Energy Inc.'s commitment and the 2022 Public Utilities Act revision that assigned Efficiency One the task of managing such programs. It emphasizes the need for NS Power to lead a technical study on energy shifts and the need for submissions from various stakeholders.

The study should also ask whether energy to meet those peak demands should be stored in a batery, a tank, a lake or in a regionally linked, diversified e p. p. 11
that correctly iden�fying the need for capacity is paramount for all subsequent IRP runs. The study should also ask whether energy to meet those peak demands should be stored in a batery, a tank, a lake or in a regionally linked, diversifi...

AI summary The text discusses the need for accurate identification of capacity in Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) runs and the importance of considering various energy storage options. It also highlights the potential for customer behavior changes due to decarbonization policies and increasing carbon prices. The Consumer Advocate supports exploring joint dispatch with New Brunswick and other provinces, including Newfoundland, for better coordination.

will be released to stakeholders for their review and NS Power will request feedback on the findings. p. p. 11
will be released to stakeholders for their review and NS Power will request feedback on the findings. will be evaluated by further study work (Updated Ac�on Plan page 7), including generator site– specific system impact studies for new var...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of system impact studies for new variable renewable generation and the potential need for synchronous condensers. It mentions the importance of a comprehensive and system-wide review, rather than a generator site-specific approach, due to the increasing integration of renewables.

N-6Refiled Reply Submission Appendix A - NSPI 4 passages
Feedback Item # Stakeholder/ Feedback Document Reference Page Theme/Feedback
(Response to Stakeholders, p. 4) We further pointed out that customers who maintain fossilfueled hea�ng systems for peak condi�ons use those systems beyond peak condi�ons, depending on energy pricing and equipment efficiency. We are concer...

AI summary The feedback highlights concerns that NS Power did not commit to analyzing the broader non-peak use of dual-fueled heating systems by residential and small commercial customers, beyond just peak conditions, which could affect energy pricing and equipment efficiency.

Section 18
We also pointed to the commitment by Eastward Energy Inc. in its recently approved rate case setlement to engage at the provincial level on a study of this issue. The 2022 revision to the Public U�li�es Act has also charged Efficiency One...

AI summary The text discusses the need for a multi-sector study on strategic electrification, involving Eastward Energy Inc., NS Power, and Efficiency Nova Scotia. It highlights the 2022 revision to the Public Utilities Act and the role of Efficiency One in administering electrification programs. The study should investigate options for meeting heating and hot water needs and consider input from various stakeholders.

The study should also ask whether energy to meet those peak demands should be stored in a batery, a tank, a lake or in a regionally linked, diversified e
that correctly iden�fying the need for capacity is paramount for all subsequent IRP runs. The study should also ask whether energy to meet those peak demands should be stored in a batery, a tank, a lake or in a regionally linked, diversifi...

AI summary The text discusses the importance of accurately identifying capacity needs for Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) runs and the need to evaluate energy storage options for meeting peak demands. It also highlights the potential changes in customer behavior related to heat pumps and the impact of decarbonization policies on NS Power's strategies.

will be released to stakeholders for their review and NS Power will request feedback on the findings.
will be released to stakeholders for their review and NS Power will request feedback on the findings. will be evaluated by further study work (Updated Ac�on Plan page 7), including generator site– specific system impact studies for new var...

AI summary The document discusses the need for evaluating the integration of synchronous condensers in the context of increased renewable generation and highlights the potential undervaluation of energy efficiency and demand response programs in NSPI's analysis. It suggests a more comprehensive and system-wide approach to assessing these issues.

N-8Electrification Strategy Report 44 passages
Preamble p. pp. 9-75
Nova Scotia has established a formal goal to transition to net zero carbon emissions by midcentury 1 , in alignment with Canada's federal target and targets set by other climate-leading nations. Achieving this goal requires rapid transform...

AI summary Nova Scotia aims to achieve net zero carbon emissions by midcentury. Electrification of transportation and building end-uses is a key strategy, requiring careful planning to manage costs, grid reliability, and infrastructure needs. Nova Scotia Power is working with E3 to assess beneficial electrification measures and their impacts on consumers, ratepayers, and the province.

Scope of Analysis in this Report p. p. 11
benefits and costs of an additional electric vehicle or heat pump on Nova Scotia's Grid? This serves as a complement to IRP PLEXOS analysis of the total impacts of electrification loads on the grid. weighted averages of marginal emissions...

AI summary The analysis examines the grid impacts of scaling electric vehicles and heat pumps, noting that marginal emissions and costs depend on energy prices, carbon policies, and efficiency measures. System-level load and peak load impacts are emphasized, with scenarios excluding energy efficiency effects. The study focuses on building heat pumps and EVs, excluding other sectors.

Key Finding 2. Most transportation electrification investments produce benefits that exceed costs from the perspective of drivers, utility ratepayers and Nova Scotia. p. pp. 14-17
rate of heat pump technology cost decline, the influence of high fuel prices on future electricity rates, rate design, oil prices, and other important variables. Finally, we note that although not within scope for this study, existing rese...

AI summary The text highlights that declining heat pump costs, high fuel prices, and rate design influence electrification economics. It argues electrification remains cheaper than decarbonized fuels for most homes, with new construction being more cost-effective than retrofits. References to Maryland and Washington studies support these claims.

Short-term Actions, Customer Programs & Capital Investments p. p. 20
- Spur electrification with ratepayer benefits: Rebates can help customers overcome electrification first-costs. While the government should support adoption aimed at achieving the societal goals and benefits of electrification, the utilit...

AI summary The text discusses the need for rebates to support electrification, emphasizing the role of utilities in encouraging technologies with better RIM results. It highlights that while EVs and oil-to-heat pump conversions can yield net revenues, some customers may require non-ratepayer funding to achieve full electrification. Transportation and space heating rebates are proposed to reduce upfront costs and encourage adoption.

Long-Term Strategy and Planning p. p. 20
Long-Term Strategy and Planning Recommendation 5. Fully incorporate electrification strategy findings, including peak impacts and mitigation strategies, into utility planning models. - Model impacts on resource needs and costs : Reliably s...

AI summary The recommendation emphasizes the need for Nova Scotia Power to fully integrate electrification strategy findings into its planning models, considering impacts on resource needs, reliability, and affordability. It highlights the importance of evaluating peak mitigation strategies, reliability benefits from managed loads, and affordability implications of electrification.

Partnerships & Customer Engagement p. p. 20
Partnerships & Customer Engagement Recommendation 7. Electrification at scale requires concerted effort and coordination across diverse organizations and interests with complementary expertise. Nova Scotia Power should continue to proactiv...

AI summary The document emphasizes the need for Nova Scotia Power to build partnerships with various stakeholders to support large-scale electrification. Key partners include Efficiency One, government, third-party EVSE providers, equipment manufacturers, transit operators, and consumer advocates. The recommendation also highlights the importance of equitable access to electrification programs for lower-income and disadvantaged communities.

Identify underserved communities and prioritize investments to ensure equitable access: p. p. 20
Identify underserved communities and prioritize investments to ensure equitable access: Without intentional program design, electrification at scale is expected to pose challenges that disproportionately impact lower-income and disadvantag...

AI summary The text discusses the importance of identifying underserved communities to ensure equitable access to electrification benefits. It highlights challenges faced by lower-income and disadvantaged communities, such as limited access to charging infrastructure and the need for infrastructure upgrades in areas served by radial transmission lines. It emphasizes the need for Nova Scotia Power and E1 to collaborate with governments to address these issues and prioritize investments that promote equity.

1.1 Motivation p. p. 30
1.1 Motivation Economy-wide decarbonization modeling in Nova Scotia and in jurisdictions across North America demonstrates that electrification of transportation and most buildings is a "safe bet" strategy for achieving Net Zero. Electrifi...

AI summary The document highlights the importance of electrification in achieving Net Zero goals in Nova Scotia, emphasizing its cost-effectiveness and the availability of current technologies. It outlines the need for Nova Scotia Power and stakeholders to understand the economic and system-level impacts of electrification to support decarbonization efforts.

1.2 Objectives p. p. 30
1.2 Objectives The objective of this report is to answer the following questions to inform Nova Scotia Power, provincial policymakers, and other stakeholders on the development of electrification programs that help the province meet its de...

AI summary This report aims to inform Nova Scotia Power and provincial policymakers on the development of electrification programs to meet decarbonization goals. It addresses jurisdictional roles of electrification, economic impacts of technologies like electric vehicles and heat pumps, and utility planning recommendations for managing electrification's effects on the electric sector.

1.3 Report Contents p. p. 30
1.3 Report Contents The study is organized as follows: - Section 2 of this report provides an overview of electrification initiatives across North America. - Section 3 assesses the impacts of electrification on Nova Scotia Power's system i...

AI summary This section outlines the structure of the report, detailing the assessment of electrification initiatives, their impacts on Nova Scotia Power's system, and the benefits and costs of electrification for the utility and province.

2.2.2 Costs p. pp. 32-33
2.2.2 Costs The economics for EVs are improving quickly and some models of EVs are expected to reach cost parity with ICE vehicles by the late 2020s. The average light-duty EV, in considering an average of vehicle ranges, is forecasted to...

AI summary The text discusses the improving economics of electric vehicles (EVs), noting that some models are expected to reach cost parity with internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles by the late 2020s, with average light-duty EVs projected to reach parity by the mid-2030s. It also references a figure showing upfront costs and total cost of ownership for BEVs and ICE vehicles.

2.2.3 Example Utility Actions p. p. 33
2.2.3 Example Utility Actions Most utilities within Net Zero jurisdictions are proactively planning for transportation electrification. The utilities with the most advanced planning for transportation electrification have aligned strategic...

AI summary Utilities in Net Zero jurisdictions are planning for transportation electrification, aligning strategic goals with transportation policies and implementing managed charging pilot programs. Examples include BC Hydro, Hydro-Québec, and Southern California Edison. Transportation electrification rate designs, such as time-of-use (TOU) rates, are being adopted, though they do not fully capture real-time electricity supply costs.

2.2.4 State of the Market and Challenges p. p. 36
2.2.4 State of the Market and Challenges The state of the market for EVs has changed drastically over the past several years. CALSTART and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) publish an annual update on the technology and market read...

AI summary The market for electric vehicles (EVs) has grown significantly, with electric LDVs classified as early market technology. However, challenges remain, including upfront costs, customer awareness, supply chain issues, and insufficient charging infrastructure. Nova Scotia has a lower percentage of BEVs compared to Canada overall and lacks registered MDVs or HDVs.

2.3.2 Costs p. pp. 37-38
2.3.2 Costs The upfront cost of installing a ducted heat pump is higher than fossil fuel heating systems in most jurisdictions, but the incremental cost can vary significantly based on heat pump type and market maturity in the region[. Fig...

AI summary The upfront cost of ducted heat pumps is higher than fossil fuel heating systems, though incremental costs vary by region and technology. In cold climates, heat pumps may offer long-term savings when paired with efficiency measures, incentives, or favorable rate designs. Electrification at scale is generally more cost-effective than relying on decarbonized gas, which is limited in supply and commercialization.

2.3.3 Example Utility Actions p. p. 38
2.3.3 Example Utility Actions In many jurisdictions with Net Zero targets, utilities have adopted programs, incentives, and customer education programs to support building electrification. It is increasingly common practice for utilities a...

AI summary Utilities in jurisdictions with Net Zero targets are implementing programs to support building electrification, including heat pump rebates, all-electric construction, retrofits, and smart thermostats. Some use ratepayer funds, while others leverage provincial budgets, local taxes, and carbon fees. Examples include Sacramento Municipal Utility District and utilities like BC Hydro and Hydro-Quebec.

2.4 Role of the Utility in Electrification p. pp. 38-40
2.4 Role of the Utility in Electrification Achieving widespread benefits from electrification requires a range of important short-term programs and long-term planning activities. Utilities play a critical role in supporting adoption, enabl...

AI summary Achieving widespread benefits from electrification requires both short-term programs and long-term planning by utilities. Nova Scotia Power must support adoption, enable interconnection, and ensure a just transition. The utility must also plan for increased system peak demand and future grid needs. Key considerations include resource needs, reliability, distribution system, revenue requirements, and affordability and equity planning.

3.2.2 Key Modeling Inputs p. pp. 43-44
3.2.2 Key Modeling Inputs To develop the transportation load shapes, key inputs into the E3 EV Load Shape Tool include: - Annual Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT): the miles or kilometers an average LDV, transit bus, and parcel truck per year...

AI summary The document outlines key modeling inputs for transportation load shapes, including annual vehicle miles travelled, EV efficiency, charger availability, and charging rates. It references Nova Scotia Power's TOU rates for residential, workplace, and public charging scenarios.

3.2.3 Transportation Scenarios p. pp. 44-45
3.2.3 Transportation Scenarios E3 modeled four scenarios for EV load shapes based on the access to rates and level of EV charge management, in order to evaluate potential impacts on load and system peak. 51 All scenarios assume adoption of...

AI summary E3 modeled four scenarios for EV load shapes based on access to rates and charge management, evaluating impacts on load and system peak. Scenarios include unmanaged charging, blended, managed with TOU, and managed with VGI aggregation, considering TOU responsiveness and load management techniques.

A summary of the scenario assumptions are shown in Figure 3-4 below. p. pp. 45-46
A summary of the scenario assumptions are shown in Figure 3-4 below. Figure 3-5. System-level light-duty EV load shape scenarios Unmanaged Charging Scenario Blended (Unmanaged and Managed with VGI) Scenario Managed with TOU Managed with VG...

AI summary The text discusses EV load shape scenarios, including unmanaged charging, blended scenarios with managed and unmanaged charging, and managed charging with TOU and VGI aggregation. These scenarios analyze access, time of use, responsiveness, and load management strategies.

3.3.3 Building Scenarios p. pp. 49-50
3.3.3 Building Scenarios In all scenarios modeled, E3 assumes that 100% of sales of heating equipment are heat pumps by 2030 resulting in nearly all residential customers and 96% of commercial customers having heat pumps by 2050. Most scen...

AI summary E3 models various scenarios for heat pump adoption in Nova Scotia by 2030 and 2050, including Current Trends, No Electric Resistance Phaseout, Best-in-Class, and Current Trends Hybrid. These scenarios consider different heat pump technologies, adoption rates, and the impact of demand-side management (DSM) on system performance.

p. pp. 50-51
Table 3-4. Building scenario design No Electric Resistance Phaseout Current Trends All-Electric Best-in-Class Current Trends Dual-Fuel Today's gas and oil heating buildings Adopt ASHP Adopt ASHP Adopt ASHP Adopt mini-split systems and reta...

AI summary Table 3-4 outlines different building scenarios for heating systems, comparing the adoption of air source heat pumps (ASHP) and electric resistance (ER) heating systems across various categories such as performance, sizing, and building shell improvements. The scenarios include No Electric Resistance Phaseout, Current Trends All-Electric, Best-in-Class, and Current Trends Dual-Fuel.

3.4 Combined Electrification Load Impacts p. pp. 55-56
3.4 Combined Electrification Load Impacts Considering both transportation and buildings, electrification will generate significant electric load and peak impacts. Transportation loads are forecasted to make up a larger portion of annual lo...

AI summary Electrification in Nova Scotia, considering both transportation and buildings, is expected to significantly increase electric load and peak demand. Transportation is projected to contribute more to annual load, while buildings are expected to disproportionately impact peak load, especially during cold winter days.

4.1 Overview of Benefit-Cost Analysis Modeling p. p. 57
4.1 Overview of Benefit-Cost Analysis Modeling E3's Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) approach assesses the marginal benefits and costs of heat pump adoption for representative heat pump technologies and building segments. The analysis presents...

AI summary E3's Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) evaluates the marginal benefits and costs of heat pump and EV adoption in Nova Scotia, using data from Nova Scotia Power and the International Council on Clean Transportation. Results are sensitive to assumptions about capital costs, fuel prices, and electricity supply costs, with more details provided in Appendix 7.2.

4.2 Benefit-Cost Analysis Model p. p. 57
4.2 Benefit-Cost Analysis Model E3's Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Model calculates the costs and benefits associated with transportation and building electrification. Costs and benefits in the E3 BCA Model are organized by perspective, usin...

AI summary E3's Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Model evaluates the costs and benefits of transportation and building electrification from three perspectives: Participant Cost Test (PCT), Societal Cost Test (SCT), and Ratepayer Impact Measure (RIM). Each perspective uses a different discount rate to calculate net present value (NPV) and assess the impact of electrification on individuals, society, and non-participating ratepayers.

Cost/Benefit Component PCT SCT RIM p. p. 59
Cost/Benefit Component PCT SCT RIM Incremental upfront EV cost Cost Cost Federal EV purchase incentives Benefit Benefit Provincial EV purchase incentives Benefit EV O&M savings Benefit Benefit Vehicle fuel savings Benefit Benefit Electrici...

AI summary The table outlines various cost and benefit components associated with electric vehicles (EVs) under the Participant Cost Test (PCT), Societal Cost Test (SCT), and Ratepayer Impact Measure (RIM). It includes factors such as incremental upfront EV costs, federal and provincial EV purchase incentives, operational savings, fuel savings, electricity costs, charging infrastructure, and avoided emissions.

Cost/Benefit Component PCT SCT RIM p. p. 59
Cost/Benefit Component PCT SCT RIM Incremental Electricity Bills1 Cost Benefit Incremental Appliance Cost Cost Cost Avoided Fuel Bills Benefit Utility Incentives Benefit Cost Electricity Supply Costs2 Cost Cost Avoided Fuel Supply Costs Be...

AI summary The table presents a cost/benefit analysis of various components related to switching to heat pumps and other energy efficiency measures. It highlights incremental electricity bills, appliance costs, avoided fuel bills, utility incentives, and emissions, showing both costs and benefits depending on the perspective of participants and the broader system.

4.4 Building Benefit-Cost Analysis Results p. pp. 68-69
4.4 Building Benefit-Cost Analysis Results [Table 4-9](#page-69-0) summarizes the results of the building electrification BCA for a select configuration of representative buildings adopting heat pumps for space heating. In general, the cus...

AI summary The benefit-cost analysis of building electrification in Nova Scotia shows that heat pumps are cost-effective for single-family homes, especially with current fuel prices. However, best-in-class heat pumps require additional incentives due to higher upfront costs. The analysis is sensitive to fuel oil prices, electricity rates, and capital costs, with assumptions based on Nova Scotia Power's experience and the Evergreen IRP Scenario 3.1C.

5. Conclusions & Implications for Nova Scotia Power p. pp. 76-77
5. Conclusions & Implications for Nova Scotia Power Across North America, electrification is a core pillar of strategies to decarbonize the economy, and it has substantial participant and societal benefits, as well as ratepayer benefits un...

AI summary Electrification is a key strategy for decarbonizing the economy across North America, offering benefits to participants, society, and ratepayers. This study provides key findings for Nova Scotia Power as it supports provincial electrification efforts.

5.1 Key Analysis Findings p. p. 77
5.1 Key Analysis Findings The analysis generated several findings related to electrification in Nova Scotia.

AI summary The analysis generated several findings related to electrification in Nova Scotia, focusing on key areas such as energy efficiency, renewable energy integration, and the impact of electrification on the grid and customers.

Key Finding 1: Building and transportation electrification reduces emissions in Nova Scotia. p. pp. 77-78
Key Finding 1: Building and transportation electrification reduces emissions in Nova Scotia. In all transportation and building electrification scenarios evaluated, incremental CO 2 emissions from electricity generation to meet vehicle cha...

AI summary Building and transportation electrification in Nova Scotia leads to significant CO2 emission reductions. Electrified vehicles and buildings produce lower lifetime emissions compared to fossil fuel alternatives, with benefits increasing as the grid becomes cleaner. For example, a light-duty electric vehicle reduces emissions by nearly 20 tons over its lifetime.

Key Finding 2. Most transportation electrification investments produce benefits that exceed costs from the perspective of drivers, utility ratepayers and Nova Scotia. p. pp. 78-86
Key Finding 2. Most transportation electrification investments produce benefits that exceed costs from the perspective of drivers, utility ratepayers and Nova Scotia. While electric vehicles have higher up-front costs today, drivers benefi...

AI summary Most transportation electrification investments, such as electric vehicles and transit buses, produce benefits that exceed costs for drivers, utility ratepayers, and Nova Scotia. Benefits include lower maintenance costs, avoided gasoline purchases, and reduced emissions. Battery cost declines are expected to improve the economics of electric vehicles over time.

5.2 Recommendations for Nova Scotia Power p. p. 86
5.2 Recommendations for Nova Scotia Power Electrification has the potential to provide significant benefits to Nova Scotians by reducing total energy expenditures and lowering the province's overall emissions footprint. However, realizing...

AI summary Electrification can benefit Nova Scotians by reducing energy costs and emissions, but requires collaboration. Nova Scotia Power is positioned to lead initiatives supporting electrification, particularly in reliability and equity. Recommendations are based on analysis and E3's experience.

Short-term Actions, Customer Programs & Capital Investments p. p. 86
prices. 73 - In this instance, E3 does not believe that submetering or installing a second meter for EVs is necessary to support EV adoption in the near-term. These options have generally 71 The conceptual ideal multi-part rate design incl...

AI summary The text discusses rate design concepts, including dynamic hourly energy rates, demand charges, and nonbypassable customer charges. It also mentions a program's success and challenges related to software customizations and the lack of direct charging control, limiting the use of VGI for renewable integration and distribution system management.

Long-Term Strategy and Planning p. p. 86
Long-Term Strategy and Planning Recommendation 5. Fully incorporate electrification strategy findings, including peak impacts and mitigation strategies, into utility planning models. - Model impacts on resource needs and costs : Reliably s...

AI summary The recommendation emphasizes the need to fully incorporate electrification strategy findings into utility planning models, focusing on resource needs, reliability impacts, and affordability. It highlights the importance of modeling peak load impacts, evaluating reliability benefits of managed loads, and assessing the equity and affordability implications of electrification.

Recommendation 6. Advance public-facing distribution planning process to support electrification p. p. 86
Recommendation 6. Advance public-facing distribution planning process to support electrification Proactive distribution system planning: Utility planners need to manage an increasingly complex distribution system proactively and effectivel...

AI summary This recommendation emphasizes the need for Nova Scotia Power to advance a public-facing distribution planning process to support electrification. It highlights the importance of proactive planning, load forecasting, and stakeholder engagement to manage increasing complexity in the distribution system and ensure reliable, resilient grid operations.

Partnerships & Customer Engagement p. p. 86
Partnerships & Customer Engagement Recommendation 7. Electrification at scale requires concerted effort and coordination across diverse organizations and interests with complementary expertise. Nova Scotia Power should continue to proactiv...

AI summary The text emphasizes the need for Nova Scotia Power to build partnerships with Efficiency One and the government to advance electrification efforts. It highlights the importance of aligning with the Public Utilities Act and Bill 228 to promote energy efficiency, reduce emissions, and ensure equitable access to electrified solutions.

Section 171 p. pp. 104-105
As discussed in Section 3, electrification at scale could potentially have large impacts on system peak loads. Many studies have demonstrated that coupling energy efficiency investments such as weatherization and building shell improvement...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of electrification and energy efficiency measures on system peak loads. It highlights that combining electrification with energy efficiency investments, such as building shell improvements, is critical for cost-effective decarbonization. E3 modeled scenarios showing significant reductions in heating demand for residential and commercial buildings through DSM strategies.

Current Trends All-Electric Best-in-Class p. p. 105
Current Trends All-Electric Best-in-Class Pre-DSM With DSM Pre-DSM With DSM Today's gas and oil heating buildings Adopt ASHP Adopt ASHP Today's electric resistance buildings Adopt ASHP Adopt ASHP Heat pump performance ASHPs are 30% base; 4...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of adopting air-source heat pumps (ASHPs) and building shell improvements on load growth in electrification scenarios. In the Current Trends scenario with DSM, shell measures reduce incremental load growth by 12% in 2050. In the Best-in-Class scenario with DSM, efficiency savings from shell improvements could result in negative incremental load growth.

9.1.3 EV O&M Savings p. p. 109
9.1.3 EV O&M Savings EVs generally have lower lifetime operating and maintenance (O&M) costs than an equivalent ICE vehicle. A per mile O&M savings, determined separately for each vehicle class, is applied to the vehicle class average life...

AI summary Electric vehicles (EVs) have lower lifetime operating and maintenance (O&M) costs compared to internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. The savings are calculated per mile and applied to the average lifetime Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) for each vehicle class.

Charger 2022 2030 p. p. 112
Charger 2022 2030 Home L1 $0 $0 Home L2 $2,568 $2,358 Work L2 $7,465 $6,855 Public L2 $7,465 $6,855 DCFC $137,279 $126,060 9.1.7 Avoided Emissions

AI summary The table outlines the projected costs for different types of chargers in 2022 and 2030. The section 'Avoided Emissions' suggests a focus on environmental benefits related to charger usage.

Section 187 p. p. 114
E3's BCA models heat pump costs declining in the future to study the evolving economics of heat pump adoption over time. E3 derived technology cost learning rates from heat pump cost projects from NREL's Electrification Futures Study : End...

AI summary E3's BCA models project declining heat pump costs over time, using learning rates from NREL's Electrification Futures Study. The analysis assumes constant labor and counterfactual heating system costs, while varying heat pump sizes based on home type and scenario design.

Appendix: E3 BCA Tool Inputs and Assumptions The Economics of Electrification in Nova Scotia: The Economics of Electrification in Nova Scotia p. pp. 114-115
Appendix: E3 BCA Tool Inputs and Assumptions The Economics of Electrification in Nova Scotia: The Economics of Electrification in Nova Scotia Table 9-5 Heat pump equipment cost learning curves End use Time period Moderate (Real %/year) Rap...

AI summary This document provides an overview of heat pump equipment cost learning curves and fuel price forecasts for the period 2020-2050, as part of the Economics of Electrification in Nova Scotia. It outlines projected cost reductions for space heating and water heating applications under different time periods and learning rates.

10.1.1 Light-duty Vehicles p. pp. 118-119
10.1.1 Light-duty Vehicles Cost-benefit breakdowns are also shown for EVs adopted in 2030. [Figure 10-1.s](#page-118-2)hows cost-benefit analysis results for an EV adopted in 2030 with unmanaged charging. Figure 10-1. NPV cost-benefit anal...

AI summary The text discusses cost-benefit analyses for light-duty vehicles (LDVs) adopted in 2030, highlighting larger savings for electric vehicles (EVs) due to reduced upfront costs and available rebates. It also compares unmanaged and managed charging scenarios, noting that savings from managed charging are limited to winter months due to time-varying rates.

10.2.1 Residential Water Heating p. pp. 119-121
10.2.1 Residential Water Heating Electrification of water heating presents net economic benefits to participants, ratepayers, and Nova Scotia. [Figure 10-3](#page-120-0) shows the results of the cost-benefit test for the adoption of a heat...

AI summary The electrification of residential water heating, specifically through heat pump water heaters (HPWH), is shown to provide significant net economic benefits to customers, ratepayers, and society in Nova Scotia. The analysis highlights that the avoided fuel costs outweigh the incremental costs of HPWH adoption, leading to lower rates and societal benefits exceeding $9,000.

N-10Electrification-Strategy-Report-Engagement-Session-Material 2 passages
Key Findings p. pp. 0-6
Key Findings E3 and NS Power developed an Electrification Study and Roadmap to summarize key findings and recommendations on programming to support beneficial electrification in both the transportationand building sectors. Based on the res...

AI summary E3 and NS Power's Electrification Study highlights that electrification reduces emissions, benefits transportation and building sectors, and may require policy changes to ensure efficient equipment adoption and avoid ratepayer impacts.

Cost Benefit Analysis p. pp. 6-7
Cost Benefit Analysis - E3 and NS Power developed a cost benefit analysis tool to enable the analysis of building and transportationelectrificationsolutions and the impactsof various programs. - The metrics produced as part of the cost ben...

AI summary E3 and NS Power developed a cost-benefit analysis tool to evaluate building and transportation electrification solutions. Metrics include participant cost, ratepayer impact, and societal cost tests. The analysis considers EV purchase costs, tax credits, O&M savings, fuel savings, and emission reductions for transportation, while buildings focus on appliance costs, electricity bills, and avoided fuel costs.

91364Submission - SBA 1 passage
Energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) may be undervalued in NSPI analysis
Energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) may be undervalued in NSPI analysis As noted above, the updated IRP requires significant buildout of new resources and capital costs have been very volatile in recent years. EE and DR program...

AI summary The document argues that energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) programs are undervalued in Nova Scotia Power's (NSPI) analysis of the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). EE and DR offer stable costs and can delay new infrastructure, yet recent U.S. research highlights their potential in decarbonizing energy portfolios. NSPI is urged to integrate these resources more comprehensively in future planning.

91371Submission - E1 4 passages
2.1 Notable Findings and Observations p. pp. 6-7
initially expected to use high efficiency equipment, but even in this scenario, opportunities for the improvement of the energy efficiency of electrified loads will likely arise over the study period. - The above differences between curren...

AI summary E1 argues that the 2019 DSM Potential Study may be overly conservative, as continued electrification planning (e.g., NS Power's 2023 Electrification Roadmap) could reveal evolving energy efficiency opportunities. The 2022 Evergreen IRP shows higher electrification trajectories than prior studies, with more aggressive scenarios, suggesting increased load expectations and efficiency potential.

- 3.3 Risk p. p. 8
- 3.3 Risk - The IRP scenarios include varying levels of risk depending on factors such as resource mix and - selection, in-service dates, retirement dates, and operating reserves. - Notable risks within the 2022 IRP include: - Atlantic Lo...

AI summary The 2022 IRP identifies risks related to resource mix, fuel costs, and peak mitigation effectiveness. Energy efficiency is highlighted as a low-risk, scalable resource, while emerging technologies and legislative changes pose uncertainties. E1 recommends a risk matrix to evaluate technical, legislative, and stakeholder risks in each scenario.

4. AVOIDED COSTS p. pp. 9-10
4. AVOIDED COSTS Avoided costs, in the context of the IRP, refer to the costs that a utility or system operator can avoid or mitigate by implementing specific resource options or DSM measures. These costs are fundamental considerations whe...

AI summary E1 requests updated avoided costs from NS Power for DSM resources (energy efficiency, solar PV, electrification) to inform the 2026-2030 DSM Plan. Stakeholder engagement with DSMAG is emphasized, with a timeline for modeling starting Q1 2024. E1 also seeks methodology for valuing demand response avoided costs and considers DER/electrification impacts on transmission/distribution.

5. NEAR-TERM PROGRESS ON EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS p. pp. 11-13
5. NEAR-TERM PROGRESS ON EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS - As part of the Evergreen IRP Final Modeling Results released on May 29th , 2023, NS Power provided - annual GHG emissions and energy production for each scenario. [14](#page-12-1) In Figure 1...

AI summary E1 highlights a 47% drop in emissions intensity from 2022 (557 g/kWh) to 2025 (293 g/kWh) in NS Power's IRP scenarios, stressing the urgency of meeting 2030/2035 climate targets. E1 requests NS Power to detail planned 2023-2025 activities driving this reduction and their current status, risks, and mitigation strategies.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →