Evidence of EfficiencyOne as Holder of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Franchise FILED February 27, 2015
AI summary Document filed February 27, 2015, addressing EfficiencyOne's evidence regarding its status as the holder of the Efficiency Nova Scotia franchise. No detailed content provided beyond the heading and filing date.
1 2. 2014 DSM RESULTS 2
AI summary This section discusses the 2014 Demand Side Management (DSM) results, involving Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) and Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), under regulatory oversight by the Utility and Ratepayer Board (UARB). Key entities include KPMG and references to the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP).
3. 2016-2018 DSM RESOURCE PLAN
AI summary The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NSPI) demand-side management initiatives, including Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs. The plan is subject to regulatory oversight by the Nova Scotia Utility and Ratepayer Board (UARB) and involves stakeholder input from entities like KPMG and the Canadian Advisory Council on Energy Efficiency (CACEE).
nd Side Management Plan, filed February 28, 2011 20 Ibid., p. 17 21 NSUARB, NSUARB-E-ENSC-R-10 ORDER, June 30, 2011 ENSC and its stakeholders[22](#page-63-0) as well as industry experts [23](#page-63-1) have noted concerns associated with...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) criticizes the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test for inaccuracies, bias, and misrepresenting ratepayer value. ENS advocates shifting to the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test, citing Dunsky Energy Consulting's recommendations. The 2016-2018 DSM Plan passes current TRC methods, but ENS emphasizes the need for accurate cost-benefit accounting in DSM planning.
4.1 Education and Outreach The complexity of the electricity system means that many concepts and terms are not familiar or accessible to most Nova Scotians. The concept of energy efficiency is equally challenging to communicate effectively...
AI summary Education and outreach are critical for promoting energy efficiency in Nova Scotia, as complex concepts require clear communication to engage residents. Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) has increased public awareness, but challenges remain in communicating intangible benefits and adapting to new technologies. The Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act underscores energy efficiency's role in the electricity supply, emphasizing the need for ongoing outreach efforts.
Schedule A: Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities
AI summary The document outlines Schedule A, which details electricity efficiency and conservation activities under Nova Scotia regulatory proceedings. No specific details or arguments are provided in the text.
Other Jurisdictions ENS retained Dunsky Energy Consulting to provide advice on a set of performance requirements that ENS should propose for the UARB's consideration in this Application. The Dunsky report, DSM Performance Indicators, is at...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) retained Dunsky Energy Consulting to advise on performance requirements for the Nova Scotia Utility and Ratepayer Board (UARB). The Dunsky report, 'DSM Performance Indicators' (Appendix G), recommends ENS propose UARB-approved performance targets including cumulative annual energy and peak demand savings over three years at the portfolio level.
2. INTRODUCTION Efficiency Nova Scotia's rate and bill impact analysis is intended to be a high-level estimate of the impacts of demand-side management (DSM) activities on rate classes' rates and bills. The analysis model, initially filed...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia's rate impact analysis model for demand-side management (DSM) provides high-level estimates of rate and bill impacts, developed by ENS and Elenchus Research Associates with Synapse Energy Economics' framework. The model was reviewed by Synapse and the DSM Advisory Group, with revisions made based on their feedback. Results are not literal but illustrate DSM options' impacts.
Investing in Demand-side Resources: Considering Affordability
AI summary The document examines the integration of demand-side resources in Nova Scotia's energy strategy, emphasizing affordability. It discusses balancing cost-effective energy efficiency programs with consumer affordability, involving entities like Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), while considering regulatory frameworks and stakeholder input.
2. Benefits of Demand-Side Resource Investments in Nova Scotia
AI summary The section discusses the benefits of demand-side resource investments in Nova Scotia but lacks specific details due to the absence of substantive text beyond the heading.
2.1 Investments in Demand-side Resources Demand-side management (DSM) is recognized as a highly cost-effective electricity supply resource.[10](#page-193-3) For Nova Scotians, DSM has reduced customer electricity costs, provided substantia...
AI summary Demand-side management (DSM) is highlighted as a cost-effective electricity resource, reducing customer costs and providing economic and system benefits since 2008. ENS's proposed investments are projected to yield over $200 million in ratepayer benefits. Jurisdictions in Canada and the U.S. recognize DSM's value, with some requiring utilities to procure all cost-effective demand-side resources.
2.5 Further Benefits of Demand-side Resource Investments
AI summary This section discusses additional benefits of demand-side resource investments, emphasizing efficiency programs and regulatory considerations in Nova Scotia. Key entities include Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB), with a focus on cost savings, environmental impact, and program administration.
MEMO To: EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA From: Philippe Dunsky Date: February 26th, 2015 Re.: DSM Portfolio Design DSM Portfolio Principles and Principles Considerations Considerations
AI summary Memo from Philippe Dunsky to Efficiency Nova Scotia discussing DSM portfolio design principles and considerations for a regulatory proceeding in Nova Scotia.
DUNSKY ENERGY CONSULTING Philippe Dunsky, President Bruno Gobeil, Senior Consultant Martin Poirier, Senior Consultant Elsa Joly, Consultant SUBMITTED TO EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA February 26, 2015
AI summary Dunsky Energy Consulting submitted a document to Efficiency Nova Scotia on February 26, 2015. The submission includes personnel details and is part of a regulatory proceeding involving energy efficiency initiatives in Nova Scotia.
2. TARGET PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
AI summary Section 2 outlines Target Performance Indicators (TPIs) for Nova Scotia's energy efficiency and demand-side management programs. It references regulatory bodies like the NSUARB, organizations such as NSPI and ENS, and programs including DSM and BER. Key themes involve performance metrics, program administration, and compliance with energy efficiency standards.
DSM SCREENING IN NOVA SCOTIA TOWARD A BALANCED COST-EFFECTIVENESS FRAMEWORK PREPARED BY DUNSKY ENERGY CONSULTING Philippe Dunsky, President François Boulanger, Senior Consultant SUBMITTED TO EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA February 23rd, 2015
AI summary A document prepared by Dunsky Energy Consulting and submitted to Efficiency Nova Scotia on February 23, 2015, discusses DSM screening in Nova Scotia toward a balanced cost-effectiveness framework. The report outlines the need for a structured approach to evaluating demand-side management programs, emphasizing cost-effectiveness and regulatory considerations.
s, or by moving to the more straightforward PAC test. While both options involve tradeoffs, in the case of Nova Scotia, the preponderance of arguments point strongly toward focusing on the PAC test: - Simplicity: Applying the PAC will be a...
AI summary The analysis recommends adopting the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test over the Total Resource Cost (TRC) method for evaluating Demand Side Management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia. Key reasons include simplicity, accuracy concerns with TRC, relevance to ratepayer interests, and alignment with the 2014 Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring Act. The National Efficiency Screening Project (NESP) is also mentioned as a related initiative.
INTRODUCTION TO DSM SCREENING
AI summary An introduction to Demand Side Management (DSM) screening in Nova Scotia, involving key organizations like Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), with references to regulatory frameworks and energy efficiency programs.
CONCERNS WITH THE CONVENTIONAL TRC
AI summary The document outlines concerns regarding the conventional Total Resource Cost (TRC) methodology, emphasizing its limitations in accurately reflecting energy efficiency programs and non-energy benefits. Key issues include outdated assumptions and insufficient consideration of modern energy solutions.
ISSUE #1: ACCURACY: IS THE TRC CALCULATED CORRECTLY? The TRC is the most common test currently in use, and compares all direct benefits, expressed through avoided energy and capacity supply costs, to all direct costs, both for the DSM prog...
AI summary The TRC (Total Resource Cost) ratio compares avoided energy and capacity costs to program and participant costs. While the simplified formula is clear, the detailed algorithm in the Standard Practice Manual lacks clarity on key inputs and assumptions. Six components of the TRC calculation may use different methodological approaches, raising concerns about accuracy.
OPTIONS FOR NOVA SCOTIA
AI summary Nova Scotia's regulatory proceeding discusses energy options involving Demand Side Management (DSM), Harmonized Sales Tax (HST), and Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). Key entities include Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB), with KPMG involved in analysis. The proceeding evaluates programs, legislation, and utility regulations.
uction in the United States. LBNL – 56637 (Rev.). - Faulkner, C. (2015, January 7). Personal Email. - Foreman, S. (2012, April 4). Re: NSUARB-E-ENSC-R-12 Request for Hearing Adjournment. Halifax, NS.
AI summary The text includes a reference to a U.S. document by LBNL, a 2015 email from C. Faulkner, and a 2012 email from S. Foreman regarding a request to adjourn a hearing related to NSUARB-E-ENSC-R-12. The latter involves Efficiency Nova Scotia Transition Corporation and Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.
Between Nova Scotia Power Incorporated and EfficiencyOne Effective Date – January 1, 2016
AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. and EfficiencyOne are parties in a regulatory proceeding with an effective date of January 1, 2016.
ABBREVIATIONS CATI Computer-assisted Telephone Interviewing CBSM Community-based Social Marketing CSA Canadian Standard Association CRA Corporate Research Associates DA Delivery Agent DSM Demand-side Management EER Energy Efficiency Ratio...
AI summary The document lists abbreviations relevant to energy efficiency, demand-side management, and regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia. Key terms include DSM (Demand-side Management), ENSC (Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation), and OPA (Ontario Power Authority), reflecting programmatic, methodological, and organizational elements central to the proceeding.
[ASK ALL RESPONDENTS] - R1. Do you have any recommendations that you think would help improve the Home Energy Report? PROBE: Anything else? [ DO NOT READ, ACCEPT MULTIPLE ] - 1. (Improve the appearance of the report) - 2. (Improve the cont...
AI summary The proceeding seeks recommendations to improve the Home Energy Report (HER), with options focusing on enhancing appearance, content relevance, clarity, or no changes. Respondents are asked to specify additional suggestions.
EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION Final Report February 26March 18, 2015 2014 DSM Evaluation Report
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation submitted a final report dated February 26–March 18, 2015, including a 2014 Demand Side Management (DSM) Evaluation Report as part of a regulatory proceeding.
ABBREVIATIONS CATI Computer-assisted Telephone Interviewing Formatted: Eco text CBSM Community-based Social Marketing Formatted: Eco text Formatted: Font: Not Bold CSA Canadian Standard Association Formatted: Eco text Formatted: Font: Not...
AI summary This section lists abbreviations and acronyms relevant to energy efficiency, regulation, and research methodologies. Key terms include DSM (Demand-side Management) and others like CATI, CBSM, and ENSC, which are defined for clarity in regulatory proceedings.
Home Energy Report (Series H)
AI summary The Home Energy Report (Series H) is part of a regulatory proceeding in Nova Scotia, focusing on energy efficiency initiatives and related programs. It involves entities such as Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and references methodologies like Demand-side Management (DSM) and Computer-assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI).
Tips (Series B)
AI summary The document is a regulatory proceeding titled 'Tips (Series B)' related to energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia. It includes context on acronyms and terms relevant to demand-side management, energy efficiency, and regulatory processes.
Verification Review of Program Year 2014 Evaluation Results Report for the Nova Scotia Utilities and Review Board H. Gil Peach, Ph.D. John Mitchell, B.S. March 26, 2015
AI summary This document is a verification review of the 2014 program evaluation results submitted to the Nova Scotia Utilities and Review Board. Authored by H. Gil Peach, Ph.D., and John Mitchell, B.S., the report dates to March 26, 2015, and outlines the analysis of program outcomes for that year.
n no longer be admitted. Everything that flows from the point at which the program vendor controls the data and the assignment falls by analogy under the legal doctrine of fruit of the poisonous tree. Evaluation of the Paper-Based componen...
AI summary The Paper-Based component evaluation used a panel study by the program vendor, but the evaluator's analysis was limited by the data provided. The program vendor's group assignments had discrepancies (numbers off by 1,000), and the evaluator did not report separate results for the two sets of groups, raising concerns about the evaluation's reliability.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The document you are attempting to access has been filed in confidence. Some exhibits, noted as confidential, contain information which if released might cause financial or other harm to the party filing it, or which...
AI summary The document is part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, marked as confidential. It warns that some exhibits contain sensitive information protected by privacy laws and Board Rules. Public redacted versions are available, and access to confidential documents requires a Confidentiality Agreement. Contact details for the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board are provided for requesting access.
Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended. - and - IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by EfficiencyOne for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Co...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board is considering EfficiencyOne's application for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc., establishment of a final agreement, and approval of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan under the Public Utilities Act. The proceeding is referenced as M06733.
& lt;sup>10 E1 (NSPI) IR-14(a), March 27, 2015, page 1, lines 22-25. 11 Please refer to Appendix A, Direct Testimony of David Pickles, April 10, 2015, page 19, lines 13-20. assess the impacts, if any, which result if E1 is not able to clai...
AI summary E1 refused to provide data on the impact of not claiming ITCs and failed to compare DSM plans as requested by NS Power. NS Power criticized E1's use of flat load profiles instead of hourly 8760-hour DSM profiles, which contradicted the ELRAM model and the Final 8760 profile.
20 (a) Selection of Lower Unit Cost Options (Measures and Programs) 21 22 E1's primary DSM planning tool in the development of the E1 DSM Plan was the 23 ELRAM. This is a proprietary spreadsheet-based model developed by Navigant 24 which u...
AI summary NS Power analyzed E1's DSM Plan using ELRAM and found that selecting lower unit cost measures could reduce costs significantly. E1's consultants argue that only choosing the lowest cost measures is not viable, but other Canadian utilities achieve lower unit costs. NS Power urges E1 to explore lower-cost options, noting E1's refusal to prepare such plans for analysis.
5.0 ALTERNATIVE DSM PLAN
AI summary The section outlines an alternative Demand Side Management (DSM) plan, referencing regulatory entities and prior planning documents. Key entities include the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) and ICF International, with acronyms like IRP and DSM central to the discussion.
5.1 NS Power's Alternative DSM Plan E1 did not develop or model any DSM investment scenarios lower than that contained in the proposed E1 DSM Plan. NS Power had requested E1 develop different plan scenarios, including one within an annual...
AI summary NS Power requested E1 (NSPI) to model lower DSM investment scenarios but was declined. E1's analysis lacks quantitative evaluation of lower expenditure options, limiting informed decision-making. NS Power proposes an alternative DSM plan aligned with Canadian benchmarks, emphasizing affordability and cost-effectiveness.
Direct Testimony of David Pickles Senior Vice President ICF International Submitted to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board on behalf of Nova Scotia Power Date: April 10, 2015
AI summary Testimony submitted by David Pickles of ICF International on behalf of Nova Scotia Power to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board on April 10, 2015.
1 I. INTRODUCTION - 2 Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. - 3 A. My name is David K. Pickles. My business address is 7160 North Dallas - 4 Parkway, Suite 340, Plano, Texas 75024. I am employed by ICF - 5 International ("ICF"), as Senior Vice Presid...
AI summary David K. Pickles, Senior Vice President of ICF International, testifies on behalf of Nova Scotia Power Inc. before the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board. He outlines his 25-year experience in Demand Side Management (DSM) programs, energy efficiency initiatives, and integrated resource planning across multiple U.S. states.
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
AI summary The document heading 'SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT' is accompanied by a list of acronyms and their expansions relevant to Nova Scotia's energy regulatory proceedings, including organizations, programs, and legislative terms. No substantive content or arguments are present in the provided text.
Review of Nova Scotia's Energy Savings Portfolio April 8, 2015 Submitted to: Nova Scotia Power Submitted by: ICF International 300-1090 Homer Street Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 2W9 Tel: +1 778.375.2347 Fax: +1 778.375.2301 canada@icfi....
AI summary A 2015 review of Nova Scotia's Energy Savings Portfolio, submitted by ICF International to Nova Scotia Power, evaluates energy efficiency programs under the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and Energy Efficiency Conservation Agreement (EECA). The analysis focuses on Demand Side Management (DSM) and regulatory frameworks involving the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB).
for the period April 1 to June 30, 2014, August 7, 2014. Efficiency Nova Scotia, Q2 Demand Side Management Report, 2014 Quarter Two Activity for the period April 1 to June 30, 2014, August 27, 2014. EfficiencyOne, Evidence of Efficiency On...
AI summary The text references Efficiency Nova Scotia's Q2 2014 Demand Side Management (DSM) report, a 2016-2018 supply agreement application, and savings verification studies for DSM programs (2010-2011). It also cites a market trends report on Nova Scotia's electricity supply and demand. Documents span 2011-2015, focusing on energy efficiency programs and regulatory proceedings.
Appendix B References 2011 Efficiency Maine Annual Report, http://www.efficiencymaine.com/docs/2011AnnualͲReport.pdf, Accessed January 29, 2015 2012Ͳ2013 Efficiency New Brunswick Annual Report, http://0101.nccdn.net/1_5/250/0f8/0fb/2012Ͳ13...
AI summary Appendix B lists references to annual reports, studies, and applications related to energy efficiency and resource planning in Nova Scotia and other provinces. Documents include Efficiency Maine and New Brunswick reports, BC Hydro resource options, and EECA supply agreements, highlighting regulatory and programmatic efforts in energy conservation and integrated resource planning.
Schedule B
AI summary Schedule B from the Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding document lists acronyms and their expansions relevant to energy efficiency, utility regulation, and resource planning. It includes organizations, programs, and regulatory frameworks involved in Nova Scotia's electricity sector.
2 Annual Partial Revenue Requirements - With FGD No DSM Plan ($K) CRP01-01-FGD-R01 Half-Low DSM ($K) Low DSM w Low DSM PA ($K) CRP2-17 FGD Base DSM ($K) CRP Mid DSM/FGD (Synapse Model) ($K) 2025 965,077 925,959 856,963 843,928 848,436 2026...
AI summary The table presents annual partial revenue requirements for Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) under various demand-side management (DSM) scenarios from 2025 to 2039, showing decreasing costs with increased DSM participation. The data is part of a regulatory proceeding involving the Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB) and the Consumer Advocate (CA).
4 Annual Partial Revenue Requirements - Without FGD CRP01-01-FGD-R01 Half-Low DSM ($K) Low DSM w Low DSM PA ($K) CRP2-17 FGD Base DSM ($K) CRP Mid DSM/FGD (Synapse Model) ($K) 2025 923,226 849,095 832,926 835,201 2026 953,822 874,449 855,0...
AI summary The document presents annual partial revenue requirements for Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) under various Demand Side Management (DSM) scenarios without FGD. Revenue figures are compared across 2025–2035 for different programs, with references to the 2016–2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) and NSPI's responses to the Consumer Advocate's information requests.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 savings – provided the right amount of DSM for the system. Contracting additional DSM to 2 avoid capacity additions beyond 2032 is costly and uncertain. 3 4 Spending in other jurisdictions 5 6 Once the Company determined...
AI summary The document analyzes Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NSPI) Demand Side Management (DSM) strategies, noting that Nova Scotians spend more than the national average on DSM. It highlights the cost and uncertainty of expanding DSM beyond 2032, advocates for efficiency to ensure affordability, and references alternative DSM options achievable for ~$22 million. A 2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) is cited.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The document you are attempting to access has been filed in confidence. Some exhibits, noted as confidential, contain information which if released might cause financial or other harm to the party filing it, or which...
AI summary This document is part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding and contains confidential information. Access requires a Confidentiality Agreement. The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board provides contact details for inquiries. Document number: 258806.
ELECTRONIC 2016-2018 DSM Plan EOne IR-25 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 3 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)
AI summary The document outlines a redacted section of Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NSPI) 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan, submitted by EfficiencyOne (E1) under IR-25. The NSUARB is reviewing the plan, which includes program details and cost-benefit analyses, though confidential information has been removed.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-50: 2 3 With regard to savings from codes and standards, please provide a spreadsheet that 4 identifies the quantities of NS Power-owned street lights (before NS Power's LED 5 Streetlight conversion program be...
AI summary The document details a request for data on NS Power's streetlight conversion program, including pre-LED fixture counts, replacements, and energy savings. NS Power responds that 83,000 roadway lights were subject to legislative changes, with 40,000 sold or in process. They lack a replacement schedule and note that Attachment 2 overstates replacements due to prior sales, excluding municipal project savings estimated at 10 GWh.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The document you are attempting to access has been filed in confidence. Some exhibits, noted as confidential, contain information which if released might cause financial or other harm to the party filing it, or which...
AI summary The document is part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding and contains confidential information. Access is restricted to parties with a Confidentiality Agreement. Contact details for the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board are provided for requesting access. Document number 258806 is referenced.
13 Ranking of Candidate Resource Plans Excluding Customer Costs of DSM 14 2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to Multeese Information Requests
AI summary The document discusses the ranking of candidate resource plans excluding customer costs of Demand Side Management (DSM) under a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. It references the 2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) and NSPI's responses to Multeese Information Requests, highlighting procedural aspects of the regulatory review.
2014 IRP Draft Analysis Results\ LOW DSM \ These are indicative results from a high level planning perspective. Can only be used to provide guidance and direction. This is not a prescriptive solution.
AI summary The 2014 IRP Draft Analysis Results present non-binding, high-level guidance for energy planning with low Demand Side Management (DSM) focus. The analysis emphasizes that these results are indicative and not a prescriptive solution for regulatory decisions.
Low DSM Input Assumptions
AI summary The document section titled 'Low DSM Input Assumptions' addresses conservative estimates used in demand-side management (DSM) programs. It involves Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB), focusing on DSM input assumptions within a regulatory proceeding.
Low DSM Preliminary Results
AI summary Preliminary results of a low-demand-side-management (DSM) analysis in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB). The document outlines initial findings related to DSM program performance and regulatory considerations.
Low DSM Preliminary Demand and DSM
AI summary The document pertains to a regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB), focusing on Low Demand Side Management (DSM) preliminary demand assessments. Key entities include NSPI, NSUARB, and DSM, with discussions centered on energy management and regulatory compliance.
Low DSM Preliminary Coal Capacity Factors
AI summary The document section titled 'Low DSM Preliminary Coal Capacity Factors' contains images but lacks textual content for analysis. Contextual references include Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB), and Demand Side Management (DSM), suggesting a regulatory proceeding involving energy capacity factors and DSM programs.
Low DSM Preliminary Hg Emissions 2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to Multeese Information Requests
AI summary The document references the 2016-2018 DSM Plan under NSUARB matter M06733 and NSPI's responses to Multeese Information Requests. It pertains to a regulatory proceeding involving preliminary mercury emissions assessments linked to demand-side management programs in Nova Scotia.
NOTICE OF HEARING EfficiencyOne has made Application to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board ("Board") for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Powe...
AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks approval from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. and a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan. The hearing details, deadlines for participation, and access to the application are outlined, with Matter No. M06733 referenced.
ORDER WHEREAS EfficiencyOne ("E 1 ") filed an Application with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board ("Board") on February 27, 2015 for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and...
AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) applied for approval of a supply agreement and a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI). The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board ordered a hearing on May 20, 2015, with specific procedural timelines outlined.
To Interested Parties M06733 - EfficiencyOne Application for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc., the establishment of a final agreement bet...
AI summary EfficiencyOne's application for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) involves a dispute over the admissibility of a Memorandum by David Pickles (ICF International) commenting on E1's Undertaking U-4. E1 objected to the Memorandum as new evidence, while NSPI argued it was admissible due to E1's prior failure to address incentive levels, E1's use of U-4 documentation, and the Memorandum's reliance on existing evidence rather than new expert testimony.
he subject of this proceeding. - [18] The EECR Act contemplated that NSPI and E1 would reach and enter into an agreement for the provision of DSM activities. The evidence in this matter reveals that the two parties, despite a period of neg...
AI summary The EECR Act required NSPI and E1 to agree on DSM activities, but negotiations failed. Under s. 79J(3), the Board was empowered to establish a final agreement between the parties on reasonable terms.
portfolio included seven programs which consisted of 16 components and initiatives. Econoler evaluated all 16 in addition to Codes and Standards. The series of reports were filed on February 27, 2015. [31] A revised version of the Home Ene...
AI summary Econoler evaluated Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2014 DSM programs, achieving 151.9 GWh energy savings and 27.1 MW peak demand savings. The report included 71 recommendations, with concerns raised about the Home Energy Report's data verification. Savings exceeded the 2014 target by 10.2%, but confidentiality issues limited data review.
3.5.4 Relationship of the Proposed 201 6-18 DSM Plan to the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan [94] During a 10-month period in 2014, NSPI developed a new IRP in collaboration with Board Staff and consultants, and in consultation with intereste...
AI summary NSPI's 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) emphasized demand-side management (DSM) to achieve cost-effective energy savings. The proposed 2016-18 DSM Plan aligns with the IRP's 'mid-DSM' scenario, which projects higher savings (519 GWh over 3 years) compared to prior DSM plans (397 GWh). The IRP process aims to balance supply-side and demand-side resources for long-term ratepayer savings.
3.9.1 Findings [119] The Board understands that El is pursuing the input tax credits for past HST which it paid while delivering DSM services. The matter is currently before the Courts and the Board will await the decision before issuing d...
AI summary The Board acknowledges El's pursuit of input tax credits for past HST paid during DSM service delivery, noting the matter is under court review. The Board will await the court's decision before issuing directions and requires El to provide full information once the matter is resolved.
3.10 Agreed form of Supply Agreement [120] El included an Agreed Form of Supply Agreement as Appendix J of its application, effective January 2016. The Supply Agreement generally outlines the terms and conditions which each party is expect...
AI summary El submitted an Agreed Form of Supply Agreement as Appendix J, effective January 2016, outlining terms under the PUA. Schedules were left blank pending the Board's decision and Compliance Filing.
rification reports and recommendations, as set out in paragraphs [53J and [54] of this Decision. The Board finds that the TRC for cost effectiveness screening is to remain in place for the time being. [146] In approving the Consensus Agree...
AI summary The Board maintains the TRC for cost-effectiveness screening, approves the Consensus Agreement with a June 30, 2016 deadline for unresolved matters, directs El to research incentive programs by March 31, 2016, and requires El and NSPI to provide alternate DSM budget scenarios and rate impact analyses in future applications.
4)2016-2018 PROGRAMS a) The DSM programs in 2016-2018 will be as proposed in EfficiencyOne's 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan filing.
AI summary The 2016-2018 Demand-Side Management (DSM) programs will follow EfficiencyOne's proposed DSM Resource Plan. This outlines the initiatives for energy efficiency and conservation during this period, as part of Nova Scotia's regulatory proceedings under the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act.
5) DSM EXPENDITURE JUSTIFICATION CRITERIA a) The parties agree to discuss the potenttal development of DSM Expenditure Justification Criteria (DSMEJC) within the DSM Advisory Group.
AI summary The parties agree to discuss the potential development of DSM Expenditure Justification Criteria (DSMEJC) within the DSM Advisory Group as part of the regulatory proceeding.
APPENDIX D
AI summary The document text provided only contains the heading 'APPENDIX D' with no substantive content. No arguments, claims, or references are present in the text.
1) ESTABLISHMENT OF A STANDARDIZED FILING FOR FUTURE APPLICAT IONS To APPROVE A DSM SUPPLY AGREEMENT - a) The Parties agree to the establishment of a standardized filing for future applications, the substance of which will be vetted throug...
AI summary Parties agree to establish a standardized filing for future DSM supply agreements, including program descriptions, energy savings, cost-effectiveness analysis, and bill impact details. The template is based on Efficiency Maine's model, with input from the DSM Advisory Group. EfficiencyOne retains flexibility to add relevant information.
Between Nova Scotia Power Incorporated and EfficiencyOne Effective Date - January 1, 2016
AI summary This regulatory proceeding involves Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI) and EfficiencyOne, with an effective date of January 1, 2016. The parties are engaged in a regulatory process under Nova Scotia's energy framework, though specific issues or claims are not detailed in the provided text.
1. INTERPRETATION - 1.1 The following terms shall be interpreted as follows in this Agreement: - (a) "Act" shall mean the Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended from time to time. - (b) "Agreement" means this agreement betw...
AI summary The 'INTERPRETATION' section defines key terms in the agreement between NSPI and EfficiencyOne. 'Act' refers to the Public Utilities Act, 'Agreement' includes the contract and attached schedules, and 'Business Day' excludes holidays in Nova Scotia.
To NSPI: Nova Scotia Power Incorporated 1223 Lower Water Street PO Box 910 Halifax, NS B3J 3S8 Attention: Corporate Secretary Facsimile: (902)428-6171
AI summary A communication addressed to Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI), including contact details for a regulatory proceeding. The document provides NSPI's address, fax number, and attention point for correspondence.
To EfficiencyOne: EfficiencyOne 230 Brownlow Avenue Suite 300 Dartmouth, NS B3B 0G5 Attention: CEO Facsimile: (902) 470-3599 - 21.2 All notices may be sent by facsimile, a nationally recognized overnight courier service, first class mail o...
AI summary The text outlines procedures for delivering notices to EfficiencyOne, specifying that notices sent via facsimile, overnight courier, or first-class mail are presumed received on specific dates. Receipt is determined by transmission confirmation, courier delivery timelines, or a five-day presumption for mail. Either party may update their notice address via written notice.
SCHEDULE C
AI summary The document is labeled as 'SCHEDULE C' from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. No substantive content is provided in the text, but context includes references to EfficiencyOne (E1), Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI), and regulatory frameworks like the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act (EECA).
James R. Gogan Direct Dial: (902) 563-5920 E-Mail: [email protected] File No. 41736-18 May 19, 2015 Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Attention: Doreen Friis, Regulatory Affairs Offi...
AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. and a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) plan. They respond to information requests, requesting confidentiality for attachments containing proprietary third-party information, arguing disclosure would harm competitive positions and future procurements. A redacted version of one attachment is already filed non-confidentially.
iencyOne's future procurements. A redacted version of Attachment 2 to Nichent IR 2 has been filed on a non-confidential basis. A complete response to this IR contains sensitive commercial information. EfficiencyOne respectfully requests th...
AI summary EfficiencyOne requests confidential treatment for Attachment 1 to SBA IR 34 due to sensitive commercial information, while a redacted version of Attachment 2 to Nichent IR 2 is already filed non-confidentially. The Breton Law Group represents EfficiencyOne in this Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, requesting restricted access to confidential documents via a Board-approved undertaking.
n Figure 3.4 of its Evidence. A revised Figure 3.4 is provided at Attachment 1 in NS Power response to Multeese IR‐6. Although the corrected information is contained in the Company's IR responses, NS Power confirms it will file an errata t...
AI summary NS Power acknowledges corrections to Figure 3.4 in its Evidence, providing a revised version in Attachment 1 of its response to Multeese IR-6. The company will file an errata with the Board reflecting these corrections. Brian Curry, Regulatory Counsel, signs the submission, with intervenors David Landrigan and Eric Ferguson copied.
- 5. No Designated Confidential Information furnished by NSPI shall be given or communicated to persons other than the Designated Recipients. For greater certainty, no Designated Confidential Information shall be provided to the clients of...
AI summary The document outlines confidentiality rules for Designated Confidential Information in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. NSPI restricts disclosure to Designated Recipients only, prohibits removal of documents without consent, and mandates non-confidential references in legal submissions. The Board may use such information in deliberations but avoids reproducing it unless confidentiality is waived. Intervenors must file confidential testimony with specific identification, and the Board may hold in Camera hearings upon NSPI's request.
ally identified as such. In addition, Designated Parties will not object to the Board sitting in Camera to hear such evidence if requested by NSPI. - 9. Should any appeal or challenge to the Board's decision in this proceeding be taken, an...
AI summary The document outlines procedures for handling confidential information in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. Designated Parties agree to in Camera hearings if requested by NSPI, and all confidential information must be returned or destroyed post-decision, with exceptions for Counsel. Counsel may retain client-related materials under specific conditions.
By Email: [email protected] James R Gogan Counsel for EfficiencyOne The Breton Law Group 292 Charlotte Street Sydney NS B1P 1C7 Dear Mr. Curry & Mr. Gogan: M06733 - EfficiencyOne - Application for Approval of a Supply Agreement for El...
AI summary EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc. seek approval for a supply agreement and a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. The Board received responses to information requests on May 19, 2015, which have been posted publicly and confidentially.
M06733 - NSPI Confidential: - E-11 (C) -NSPI (CA) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-41 -Confidential - E-11 (ix)(C)- NSPI (CA) IR-20 Attachment 9 F- Confidential- Electronic - E-11 (x)(C)- NSPI (CA) IR-20 Attachment 10 F- Confidential- Electronic - E-11...
AI summary Confidential regulatory proceeding documents (M06733) submitted by NSPI include various attachments and scenarios related to RIRs (Regulatory Information Requests) for different IR numbers, indicating a comprehensive submission process.
M06733- E1 Board Only Confidential: - E-25(C)(i} E1{Nichent) RIR to IR-01, Attachment 2 Confidential- Board Only (Electronic Only) - E-25(C)(ii) E1{Nichent) RIR to IR-02, Attachment 2 Confidential Board Only (Electronic Only)
AI summary Confidential submissions (E-25(C)(i) and E-25(C)(ii)) related to a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding (M06733-E1) are listed, indicating attachments to IR-01 and IR-02. No detailed arguments or entities are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
M06733 - EfficiencyOne Application - Confidential: E-28(C)- SBA IR-34 Attachment 1 Confidential For your reference attached is the updated Exhibit List for this proceeding. r>Yours truly, 'J,~,~{QfhA. \_ ", -._ \ Doreen Friis Regulatory Af...
AI summary The document references an updated Exhibit List for the EfficiencyOne application proceeding (M06733). It includes a signature from Doreen Friis, Regulatory Affairs Officer, and mentions Board Counsel Bruce Outhouse. No substantive arguments or claims are presented in the text.
June 1, 2015 Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: M06733 – EfficiencyOne – 2016‐2018 Demand Side Management ("...
AI summary NS Power submits a revised version of its Evidence for M06733 – EfficiencyOne's 2016-2018 DSM Plan, incorporating corrections to address Information Requests (IRs) from EAC, Multeese, and SBA. Revisions include updated appendices, tables, and figures, with specific changes outlined in responses to IRs.
x D, Attachment 3. EfficiencyOne is submitting a revised complete version of its Evidence and Attachment 1 to its response to Synapse IR-17 (filed electronically), reflecting the changes noted above. If you have any questions or concerns,...
AI summary EfficiencyOne submits a revised version of its evidence and Attachment 1 to its response to Synapse IR-17, with hard copies to be delivered. The Breton Law Group is involved in the submission.
NOVA SCOTIA MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC UTILITIES OF NOVA SCOTIA COOPERATIVE
AI summary The document outlines a regulatory proceeding involving the Nova Scotia Municipal Electric Utilities Cooperative. The acronym E1 refers to EfficiencyOne, which may be relevant to the proceeding.
To: Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board - 1. MEUNSC as a significant purchaser of power from NSPI having been charged a DSM rider under the municipal rate intends to participate in this proceeding. - 2. MEUNSC asks that all further notice...
AI summary MEUNSC participates in the proceeding due to being charged a DSM rider under the municipal rate and requests all notices and information be provided to specified contacts, including representatives from MEUNSC, Berwick Electric, and others.
Notice of Intention to Participate - MEUNSC EfficiencyOne has reviewed the Notice of Intention to Participate filed by the Nova Scotia Municipal Electric Utilities of Nova Scotia Cooperative received on June 8, 2015 in respect to the above...
AI summary EfficiencyOne objects to adding Nova Scotia Municipal Electric Utilities of Nova Scotia Cooperative as an intervenor, citing the application's lateness and potential prejudice to the co-applicant. They argue the intervenor lacks time to submit evidence and the applicant's interest is unclear, suggesting the applicant's issues should be addressed during the public session on June 16, 2015.
Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board Mailing address PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia 83J 3S3 [email protected] Web www.nsuarb.novascotia.ca Office 3rd Floor, 1601 Lower Water Street Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3P6 1 855 442·4448 (tol...
AI summary MEUNSC submitted a late Notice of Intervention in M06733 regarding EfficiencyOne's DSM Plan with NSPI. The Board denied the intervention due to lateness and potential prejudice to EfficiencyOne, despite MEUNSC's experience and media coverage. The Panel includes Gurnham, Dhillon, and Clarke. MEUNSC may speak at the June 15 hearing.
Attachment c. S. Bruce Outhouse, Q.C., Board Counsel M06733 Participants
AI summary Attachment lists S. Bruce Outhouse, Q.C., as Board Counsel for matter M06733 in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. The document identifies participants involved in the proceeding.
Via Email Registered Speakers List Dear Speakers: M06733 EfficiencyOne Application for approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between Efficiency One and Nova Scotia Power Inc. - List of Speake...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board is conducting a hearing (M06733) regarding EfficiencyOne's application for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. for electricity efficiency initiatives. The email notifies registered speakers of the evening session on June 15, 2015, and instructs them to limit remarks to five minutes.
Conclusion In conclusion, EfficiencyOne maintains its request for confidential treatment of Attachments 2, 3, 6 and 7 of its response to Undertaking U-4 in relation to these proceedings. EfficiencyOne is prepared to withdraw its request fo...
AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks confidential treatment for specific attachments in its response to Undertaking U-4, offering to withdraw confidentiality for others. The Breton Law Group submitted this on behalf of EfficiencyOne, with a carbon copy to Board Counsel M06733.
Settlement Agreement signed by 5 intervenors/applicants:
AI summary A Settlement Agreement involving five intervenors/applicants in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. Key entities include the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB), Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), and the Affordable Energy Coalition (AEC). The agreement addresses Demand Side Management (DSM) and other regulatory matters, reflecting stakeholder collaboration.
c. Other issues in the Settlement Agreements
AI summary The section addresses unresolved issues in the Settlement Agreements, involving regulatory oversight and stakeholder positions. Key entities include Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB), Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI), and the Affordable Energy Coalition (AEC).
AFFORDABLE ENERGY COALITION FINAL STATEMENT
AI summary The Affordable Energy Coalition submitted a final statement in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, though the provided text contains no further details on arguments, claims, or specific issues addressed.
referred to the DSM Advisory Group. MR. MAHODY: ...You're familiar with what the testimony was for Mr. Athas regarding the expenditure justification criteria? MS. CURTIS: Yes, I'm familiar with it. MR. MAHODY: Okay. Do you have any objecti...
AI summary The SBA recommends developing DEJC (Demand Expenditure Justification Criteria) for DSM, similar to the CEJC model used in the Annual Capital Expenditure proceeding. The SBA's consultant, John Athas, supports this approach, requesting the Board's approval for the DSM Advisory Group to evaluate and manage DSM programs. The Board is asked to approve potential DEJC development.
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act - and - IN THE MATTER OF: EfficiencyOne's Application pursuant to Subsection 79J(3) of the Public Utilities Act for Approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board is considering EfficiencyOne's application under the Public Utilities Act for approval of a 2016-2018 supply agreement focused on electricity efficiency and conservation activities. The proceeding involves regulatory review of the proposed agreement under Subsection 79J(3) of the Act.
cript, June 16, 2015, p.480-490 & lt;sup>45 Exhibit E-68. & lt;sup>46 Transcript, June 16, 2015, p.483. & lt;sup>47 Transcript, June 16, 2015, p.336. & lt;sup>48 Exhibit E-40, Direct Evidence from Drazen Consulting Group, Inc. on Behalf of...
AI summary The document discusses the flexibility of Demand Side Management (DSM) in Nova Scotia, referencing NSPI's evidence and various exhibits and transcripts from the regulatory proceeding. Key entities include NSPI, the Industrial Group, and Drazen Consulting, with topics centered on DSM and energy policy.
EFFICIENCYONE CLOSING SUBMISSION FILED July 8, 2015
AI summary EfficiencyOne submits its closing arguments in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, advocating for the approval of its energy efficiency programs. The submission emphasizes the programs' cost-effectiveness, consumer benefits, and alignment with provincial energy goals, seeking regulatory endorsement.
19 Establishment of a Standardized filing for future applications to approve DSM
AI summary The proposal aims to establish a standardized filing process for future Demand Side Management (DSM) applications, ensuring consistency and efficiency in approvals under the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board. This aligns with Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) requirements, streamlining regulatory procedures for DSM initiatives.
23 STATUS OF KPMG PROCUREMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND
AI summary The document discusses the current status of KPMG's procurement recommendations within the Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, though no further details are provided in the text.
file 20 the level of detail for the DSM Plans it filed, as interim DSM administrator, for 2008-2011, 21 despite now asserting such detail is required for appropriate review and approval purposes. 22 23 To the specific alternate scenarios (...
AI summary NS Power presents alternate scenarios (a-d) not for approval but to demonstrate EfficiencyOne's potential energy savings. The scenarios are criticized for methodological flaws. NS Power's interim DSM plans for 2008-2011 lack detail, despite now asserting such detail is needed for review. Legislation cited includes the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring Act and Public Utilities Act.
CLOSING SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP ____________________________________________________________________________
AI summary The Industrial Group submitted closing arguments in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, though no specific details are provided in the text.
E-7, E1(NSPI) IR-10, Workbook, Column 63. 29 Undertaking U-4, pdf pp.4-5. 30 Exhibit E-7, E1(NSPI) IR-10, rows 233-234.
AI summary The document references arguments that incentives in the Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding are too high, citing exhibits and pages from Undertaking U-4 and E-7, E1(NSPI) IR-10. Key entities involved include EfficiencyOne (E1) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI).
ered to create a plan with a step change, it would result in a three to six month delay. However, it is notable that even now, E1 has not presented a final formed implementation plan. As stated by E1, As with prior DSM and DSM Resource Pla...
AI summary E1 has not provided a final implementation plan for its DSM Resource Plan, leading to uncertainty about the delay's reasons. The CA argues that a three to six month delay in a three-year contract is reasonable to avoid unnecessary programs beyond system requirements.
STAKEHOLDER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT The Ecology Action Centre urges the Board to support the Settlement Agreement signed by the Ecology Action Centre, EfficiencyOne, Small Business Advocate, Consumer Advocate, and Affordable Energy Coalition...
AI summary The Ecology Action Centre (EAC) urges the Board to support a Settlement Agreement signed by multiple stakeholders, including EfficiencyOne, Small Business Advocate, and others. The agreement builds on a prior Partial Settlement Agreement involving Nova Scotia Power and the Industrial Group, with Exhibit 61 highlighting areas of consensus.
Via Email: [email protected] David Landrigan General Manager, Regulatory Nova Scotia Power Inc. 1223 Lower Water Street P. 0. Box 910 Halifax, NS B3J 2W5 Dear Mr. Landrigan: M06733 EfficiencyOne Application for Approval of a Suppl...
AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) seeks approval for a supply agreement and DSM plan with EfficiencyOne. The objection by Mr. Gogan to ICF International's memorandum is noted, with a deadline for NSPI's response by July 16, 2015. The matter is referenced as M06733.
Re: M06733 – Nova Scotia Power Incorporated – Reply Submissions This correspondence is further to your letter of July 13, 2015 and Mr. Gogan's letter of July 9, 2015, objecting to the inclusion of a memorandum prepared by ICF International...
AI summary Nova Scotia Power (NS Power) responds to objections regarding the inclusion of ICF International's memorandum in its submission. NS Power argues E1's objections are without merit, citing E1's failure to provide incentive rationale, E1's use of U-4 documents in its closing submission, and the appropriateness of Mr. Pickles' memorandum based on existing evidence. NS Power asserts the Board should consider the memorandum.
E1 replied: Please refer to EfficiencyOne's response to NSPI IR-10 Attachment 1, filed electronically, for measure-level incentives modelled in the EL-RAM, which are provided in column BK. The modelled incentive dollars provided reflect ac...
AI summary E1's response to IR-12(g)(iv) was deemed non-responsive by NS Power, which argues that E1's submission lacked analysis and relied on unverified data. NS Power cites Board Regulatory Rules and precedents like Wolfson to assert the need for procedural fairness, emphasizing that E1's failure to adequately address the IR prejudiced NS Power's ability to respond to U-4. The Board's jurisdiction to manage undertakings and ensure full disclosure is highlighted.
2. E1 offers commentary based on U-4; Mr. Pickles should be permitted to offer commentary as well In its closing submission, E1 argues that the evidence concerning the appropriateness of its incentive levels is uncontradicted (pages 53 to...
AI summary E1 argues its incentive levels are uncontradicted and relies on new commentary from U-4 documents submitted post-hearing. It criticizes NS Power for allowing contrary commentary while itself submitting new evidence. NS Power asserts it is fair to comment on E1's U-4 documents.
3. Mr. Pickles' memorandum is not new evidence In his memorandum, Mr. Pickles sets out his review of U-4 and states whether the documentation provided supports E1's position that its incentive levels are appropriate. Mr. Pickles' comments...
AI summary Mr. Pickles' memorandum is criticized by E1 for making inappropriate jurisdictional comparisons, but the response clarifies that his comments only reference E1's own comparisons to high-cost states. The memorandum is deemed not new evidence, as it does not introduce new facts or statistics but critiques E1's existing documentation. The Board's relaxed evidence rules are highlighted, allowing broad discretion in admitting evidence.
Conclusion Mr. Pickles' memorandum is appropriate and should be considered by the Board. It is commentary on the documentation E1 provided in response to U-4. The documentation in question was requested well in advance of the hearing by NS...
AI summary The document concludes that Mr. Pickles' memorandum should be considered by the Board as commentary on E1's unresponsive answer to NS Power's IR regarding U-4. NS Power argues E1 cannot complain about NS Power's comments if E1 relies on the same documentation in its closing submission. If the Board rejects the memorandum, NS Power asserts E1's initial response to U-4 was inadequate.
July 14, 2015 E1's Closing Submission) should also not be considered by the Board on the basis that it would be prejudicial to NS Power for the reasons stated above. Yours very truly, Colin J. Clarke CJC/rb cc: David Landrigan S. Bruce Out...
AI summary The document states that E1's Closing Submission should not be considered by the Board as it would prejudice NS Power. Signed by Colin J. Clarke and copied to David Landrigan and Board Counsel S. Bruce Outhouse, the submission references Interested Parties M06733.
utility under the Public Utilities Act.4 However, the Closing Submissions of the Consumer Advocate, page 2. 2 Closing Submissions of the Consumer Advocate, page 2. Exhibit E-61, Item 2. &# x27;Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380,s....
AI summary The Consumer Advocate's submission is challenged for not considering NSPI's 8-year cost recovery period, arguing that amortizing DSM settlement amounts under the Public Utilities Act's section 79R ensures consistency with transitional expenditures.
E1 DSM Plan as being affordable for and in the best - interests of NS Power customers[1](#page-2-2) . 1 NS Power Closing Submission, Page 49, Lines 3-5. The Act requires EfficiencyOne to develop a DSM Resource Plan and present it, along wi...
AI summary EfficiencyOne submits a DSM Plan, claiming compliance with the Public Utilities Act by providing evidence to the Board. NS Power argues the plan's single submission contradicts Board consultant Mel Whalen's testimony. The Act mandates EfficiencyOne to justify proposed efficiency activities, with NS Power relying on the franchise holder's expertise.
n what's the purpose of comparing a program which is almost identical to the DSM one? I would have thought you'd go in a different direction and want to stretch the analysis as far as possible. MR. DUNSKY: I'm not sure why I'd want to stre...
AI summary The discussion centers on the methodology for benchmarking DSM program costs, with Mr. Dunsky arguing that comparisons should be 'like to like' to assess reasonableness. EfficiencyOne challenges NS Power's approach, claiming it is unreliable for the current regulatory proceeding. The exchange highlights disputes over appropriate analytical frameworks for resource planning.
INCENTIVES Both NS Power and the Industrial Group take effort in their closing arguments to assert that the cost of incentives provided by EfficiencyOne are too high and, somewhat relatedly, that there is a lack of evidence to support the...
AI summary NS Power and the Industrial Group argue that EfficiencyOne's incentives are too costly and lack evidence of value. EfficiencyOne counters that Mr. Pickles' assessment of their Undertaking U-4 has a fundamental flaw. Exhibit E-1 is referenced in the rebuttal.
VIA EMAIL 27235 Ms. Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Friis: Re: M06733 – EfficiencyOne – Application for Approval of a Supply...
AI summary The Consumer Advocate responds to NSPI and the Province's request to reject EfficiencyOne's proposed program and submit a new one. The proceeding involves approval of a supply agreement and a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc.
James R. Gogan Direct Dial: (902) 563-5920 E-Mail: [email protected] File No. 41736-18 July 9, 2015 Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Attention: Doreen Friis, Regulatory Affairs Offi...
AI summary EfficiencyOne objects to Nova Scotia Power Incorporated's inclusion of a new expert memorandum by ICF International in its closing submissions, arguing it prejudices their position by introducing late evidence. EfficiencyOne asserts they complied with the Board's deadline for filing undertakings, including U-4, well before the July 8 closing submissions date.
ing 4 directed EfficiencyOne to provide an assessment of its incentive levels. This document was filed with the Board on June 24, 2015, well in advance of the closing submissions date of July 8, 2015. Through the ICF Memorandum, NS Power n...
AI summary NS Power submitted a memorandum introducing evidence on EfficiencyOne's incentive levels, which EfficiencyOne objects to, arguing it is prejudicial and prevents cross-examination of Mr. Pickles. The Board previously rejected new evidence in closing submissions, as seen in Halifax Regional Municipality Charter and Clarke et al., 2013 NSUARB 163 .
ividual Appellants. The Board agrees that this new evidence, which of course cannot be introduced at this stage of the Appeal. Accordingly, the Board has not considered this material. [emphasis added] Similarly, the Board in Harris Studio...
AI summary The Board declines to consider new evidence introduced in closing submissions, citing prejudice to opposing parties. It references Harris Studio Incorporated , 2012 NSUARB 36, emphasizing that unexamined evidence should not be accepted. EfficiencyOne argues against ICF's memorandum, claiming it introduces unexamined expert testimony, while NS Power is permitted to make legal arguments about Undertaking U-4.
To Interested Parties M06733 - EfficiencyOne Application for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc., the establishment of a final agreement bet...
AI summary EfficiencyOne applied for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), including a 2016-2018 DSM Plan. NSPI submitted a memorandum by David Pickles critiquing EfficiencyOne's (E1) incentive levels, which E1 objected to as new evidence. NSPI argued the memorandum was admissible due to E1's prior failure to address incentive rationale, E1's use of U-4 documents, and the memorandum's reliance on E1's own evidence.
he subject of this proceeding. - [18] The EECR Act contemplated that NSPI and E1 would reach and enter into an agreement for the provision of DSM activities. The evidence in this matter reveals that the two parties, despite a period of neg...
AI summary The EECR Act required NSPI and E1 to agree on DSM activities, but negotiations failed. Under s. 79J(3), the Board was mandated to establish a final agreement between the parties on reasonable terms.
3.10 Agreed form of Supply Agreement [120] El included an Agreed Form of Supply Agreement as Appendix J of its application, effective January 2016. The Supply Agreement generally outlines the terms and conditions which each party is expect...
AI summary El submitted an Agreed Form of Supply Agreement as Appendix J, effective January 2016, outlining terms under the PUA. Some schedules were left blank pending the Board's decision and Compliance Filing.
3.11 Compliance with Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act [122] Section 79J of the PUA contemplates that El and NSPI will enter into an agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation. That implies to the...
AI summary The Board emphasizes the need for good faith negotiations between El and NSPI under the PUA regarding DSM budgets. Despite significant litigation and costs, the parties eventually reached a Consensus Agreement. The Board criticizes the unnecessary litigation and highlights that ratepayers fund both parties' activities.
3.12 Establishment of a Standardized Filing for Future Applications to approve a DSM Supply Agreement [124] The Consensus Agreement proposed to establish a standardized filing for future applications by El. The parties to the Consensus Agr...
AI summary The Consensus Agreement proposes a standardized filing for future DSM Supply Agreement applications, including energy savings, cost-effectiveness analysis, and rate impact details. The matter is referred to the DSM Advisory Group for recommendations. El agrees to provide technical data in future plans.
rification reports and recommendations, as set out in paragraphs [53J and [54] of this Decision. The Board finds that the TRC for cost effectiveness screening is to remain in place for the time being. [146] In approving the Consensus Agree...
AI summary The Board maintains the TRC for cost-effectiveness screening, mandates El to research incentive programs by March 2016, and requires El and NSPI to submit alternate DSM budget scenarios with rate impact analysis. The Consensus Agreement includes a provision to resolve unresolved matters by June 2016.
6.0 ORDER [149] An Order will issue following a Compliance Filing. The Compliance Filing is to be filed by September 15, 2015. If that is problematic, El and NSPI should approach Board Counsel to discuss an alternate date. DATED at Halifax...
AI summary An order requires a Compliance Filing by September 15, 2015, with flexibility for El and NSPI to request an alternate date via Board Counsel. The order is dated August 12, 2015, signed by Peter W. Gurnham and Kulvinder S. Dhillon.
1) IMPORTATION OF AGREEMENT a) The parties agree to incorporate by reference all of the terms of agreement reached in the partial settlement agreement among Efflcienqvne, Nova Scotia Power, the Consumer Advocate, the Small Bwiness Advocate...
AI summary The parties agree to incorporate terms from a partial settlement agreement (Matter M06733) involving multiple stakeholders, including Nova Scotia Power Inc., the Consumer Advocate, and others, before the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.
NOTICE OF MID-COURSE ADJUSTMENTS On the issue of mid-course adjustments, EfficiencyOne is seeking to clarify its position in regard to the provision of advanced notice to the Board and to Stakeholders. In its Decision, the Board stated wit...
AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks clarification on providing advance notice for mid-course adjustments, except when driven by evaluation reports requiring immediate action. The Consensus Settlement Agreement acknowledges this exception, allowing immediate implementation with subsequent communication.
VIA EMAIL September 25, 2015 Ms. Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Friis: Re: EfficiencyOne Compliance Filing / M06733
AI summary A compliance filing related to EfficiencyOne is submitted via email on September 25, 2015, addressed to Ms. Doreen Friis of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, referencing matter M06733.
Concerns about Future Cost Allocation and Recovery Uncertainty The SBA is limited in its review and comment on spending levels for EfficiencyOne programs on a total level. It is difficult for comment and review on specific program budgets...
AI summary The SBA highlights uncertainty regarding cost allocation and recovery for EfficiencyOne programs, noting that NS Power's payments to EfficiencyOne may not be clearly recoverable from specific rate classes. Two scenarios are outlined: either costs are recovered without triggering a rate application, or they are included in a General Rate Application with unclear allocation. The SBA requests the Board to address future cost recovery principles to avoid rate class impacts.
Delivered by E-mail Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 3rd Floor 1601 Lower Water Street PO Box 1692 Unit "M" Halifax NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Friis: Re: M06733 – 2016-2018 DSM Plan On September 1...
AI summary EfficiencyOne submitted a Compliance Filing on September 15, 2015, following the Board's decision. The Industrial Group is providing comments on the 2016-2018 DSM Plan under matter M06733. The filing relates to regulatory compliance and stakeholder input.
Between Nova Scotia Power Incorporated and EfficiencyOne Effective Date – January 1, 2016
AI summary The document outlines a regulatory proceeding between Nova Scotia Power Incorporated and EfficiencyOne, effective January 1, 2016. No further details about the proceeding's nature, arguments, or outcomes are provided in the text.
NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED , a body corporate, organized under the laws of the Province of Nova Scotia (hereinafter called " NSPI ") - and -
AI summary Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI) is established as a body corporate under Nova Scotia provincial law. The text introduces NSPI as the entity involved in the regulatory proceeding, with no further details provided.
- (d) " Consequential Losses " means consequential, special, incidental, multiple, exemplary or punitive damages including lost profits, whether such claim of lost profits is categorized as indirect, direct or consequential damages or unde...
AI summary This section defines key legal terms for a regulatory agreement, including Consequential Losses, Contract Documents, EECA Plan, Environmental Laws, and Force Majeure Events. Terms relate to contractual obligations, regulatory compliance, and electricity efficiency programs under Nova Scotia's regulatory framework.
To EfficiencyOne: EfficiencyOne 230 Brownlow Avenue Suite 300 Dartmouth, NS B3B 0G5 Attention: CEO Facsimile: (902) 470-3599 - 21.2 All notices may be sent by facsimile, a nationally recognized overnight courier service, first class mail o...
AI summary The text outlines procedures for delivering notices under a regulatory proceeding, specifying that notices sent via facsimile, courier, or mail are presumed received on specific business days. It details rules for determining receipt dates based on transmission method and business day definitions.
Confidential Information 1. The Parties agree that for the purpose of this Agreement "Confidential Information" means all information, regardless of the form in which it is communicated or maintained and prepared by the Disclosing Party, a...
AI summary The document defines 'Confidential Information' as all data shared between parties under the Supply Agreement, Legislation, or the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB). It includes reports, analyses, intellectual property, and materials filed with the UARB. The definition emphasizes protection of sensitive data, including electronic access details, and applies to information shared directly or indirectly.
Between Nova Scotia Power Incorporated and EfficiencyOne Effective Date - January 1, 2016
AI summary A regulatory proceeding between Nova Scotia Power Incorporated and EfficiencyOne, with an effective date of January 1, 2016. The document outlines the parties involved but does not detail specific arguments or procedural matters.
BETWEEN:
AI summary The regulatory proceeding involves Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI) and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (Board), with participation from the Consumer Advocate (CA), Small Business Advocate (SBA), Affordable Energy Coalition (AEC), and Ecology Action Centre (EAC). Key entities and their roles are outlined in the proceeding.
en NSPI and EfficiencyOne including all Schedules attached hereto. - (c) "Business Day" means Monday to Friday, except federal, provincial, and civic holidays within the Province of Nova Scotia.
AI summary The document defines 'Business Day' as Monday to Friday, excluding holidays in Nova Scotia, and references NSPI and EfficiencyOne as parties involved in the regulatory proceeding. The definition is part of the interpretation section of the proceeding.
5. NOTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES 5.1 EfficiencyOne shall provide notice of Significant Changes to NSPI at the same time as EfficiencyOne makes application to the UARB for the approval of the Significant Changes. Subject to the terms...
AI summary EfficiencyOne must notify NSPI when applying to the UARB for approval of significant changes to the EECA Plan. NSPI retains the right to submit written comments to the UARB on such changes, subject to the Act and UARB's discretion.
21. NOTIFICATIONS 21.1 All notices to be given to either Party under this Agreement shall be written and addressed to the NSPI and to EfficiencyOne as follows:
AI summary The section outlines that all notices under the Agreement must be in writing and addressed to NSPI and EfficiencyOne.
To EfficiencyOne: EfficiencyOne 230 Brownlow Avenue Suite 300 Dartmouth, NS B3B 0G5 Attention: CEO Facsimile: (902) 470-3599 - 21.2 All notices may be sent by facsimile, a nationally recognized overnight courier service, first class mail o...
AI summary The document outlines procedures for delivering notices to EfficiencyOne, specifying that notices sent via facsimile, overnight courier, or first-class mail are presumed received on specific dates. It also allows either party to update their notice address with prior written notification.
24. SHARING OF DATA AND INFORMATION - 24.1 EfficiencyOne shall work co-operatively with NSPI to provide NSPI with information and data from time to time in order to assist NSPI with planning and load forecasting as may be reasonably requir...
AI summary EfficiencyOne must share data with NSPI for planning and load forecasting, adhering to past practices. Disputes over data requests may be resolved by applying to the UARB. Key entities involved are EfficiencyOne, NSPI, and UARB.
Supply Agreement. In support of their respective applications, both E1 and NSPI filed evidence with the UARB. To the extent possible, E1 and NSPI have reached agreement on certain elements of the Supply Agreement. - E1, as the franchise ho...
AI summary The document outlines a Supply Agreement between E1 and NSPI, with E1 assuming full financial risk for DSM delivery in Nova Scotia. E1's obligations include meeting UARB-approved energy savings targets without seeking additional funds from NSPI, relying on internal controls and potential UARB funding for extraordinary events. Termination or non-renewal of E1's franchise would transfer all assets/liabilities to a new holder.
ember 13, 2015 In its decision in this matter, the Board recognized the concerns raised by various stakeholders and directed EfficiencyOne to explore more cost effective avenues to finance deferrals: [91] The DOE raised the issue of deferr...
AI summary The Board directed EfficiencyOne to explore cheaper financing options for DSM deferrals, noting the high cost of NSPI's rate base (7.78%) compared to bank financing (3%). EfficiencyOne engaged Grant Thornton to research financing methods, with results due by November 16, 2015. The Board emphasized the need for cost-effective solutions, while EfficiencyOne highlighted potential external financing with NS Power's backstopping.
terest rate with the possibility of a lower upfront cost. The timing of financing 2015 DSM activities may be completed as early as the end of Q1 2016, dependent on the timing of the Board's directive. In summary, this report indicates that...
AI summary The text discusses financing options for 2015 and 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) investments, contingent on Board approval and coordination with NS Power. EfficiencyOne seeks further direction from the Board on commercial terms for external financing.
Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board Mailing address PO Box 1692, Umt"M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J3S3 [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Office 3rd Floor, 1601 LowerWater Street Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3P6 1 855 442-4448 (to...
AI summary A document dated November 17, 2015, from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board addresses a communication sent via email to James R. Gogan of EfficiencyOne, represented by The Breton Law Group. The proceeding involves regulatory matters in Nova Scotia, with contact details provided for the board.
Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board Mailing address PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J3S3 [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) httD://nsuarb.novascotia.ca Office 3rd Floor, 1601 LowerWater Street Halifax, Nova Sco...
AI summary A letter dated November 23, 2015, addressed to James R. Gogan of EfficiencyOne via The Breton Law Group, is sent to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board. The document includes contact information for the board and details the mailing and office addresses, phone numbers, and email.
M06733 - EfficiencyOne - Financing DSM Grant Thornton Report (E-ENSC-R-15) This is further to your letter dated November 13, 2015, filing the Grant Thornton Report, and the Board's letter of November 17, 2015. The Board has requested Board...
AI summary The Board responds to the Grant Thornton Report submitted by EfficiencyOne, noting discrepancies in assumptions regarding $102 million in DSM funding. A meeting with EfficiencyOne and NSPI is requested, and concerns about the lending community's reaction are highlighted. Board Counsel will coordinate further discussions.
Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board Mailing address PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J353 [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Office 3rd Floor, 1601 Lower Water Street Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J3P6 1 855 442-4448 (...
AI summary A communication from EfficiencyOne, represented by James R. Gogan of The Breton Law Group, to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board dated December 8, 2015. The letter includes contact details for EfficiencyOne and the Board.
nt was in the review and execution process within NSPI. NSPI has not yet confirmed it has executed the Agreement, nor has it expressed any concerns or requested any further revisions to the Agreement. Grant Thornton has prepared a formal f...
AI summary NSPI has not confirmed execution of an agreement with EfficiencyOne. Grant Thornton submitted a financing package to seven lenders, responding to inquiries until February 12, 2016, with EfficiencyOne aiming to secure financing by March 31. A contract between EfficiencyOne and NSPI is required by lenders. The Breton Law Group and Board Counsel M06733 are involved.
Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →