Topic:"Infrastructure Planning" in M06733

Low Income Homeowner Service The Low Income Homeowner Service obtained energy savings of 2.3 GWh in 2014, an increase compared to the 1.7 GWh achieved in 2013. ENSC completed upgrades in 961 homes compared to the 739 homes in 2013. ENSC st...

AI summary The Low Income Homeowner Service achieved 2.3 GWh energy savings in 2014, up from 1.7 GWh in 2013, with ENSC upgrading 961 homes. The program prepared for transitioning to the Clean Foundation by January 1, 2015, requiring joint planning between ENSC and the Clean Foundation.

3. 2016-2018 DSM RESOURCE PLAN

AI summary The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NSPI) demand-side management initiatives, including Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs. The plan is subject to regulatory oversight by the Nova Scotia Utility and Ratepayer Board (UARB) and involves stakeholder input from entities like KPMG and the Canadian Advisory Council on Energy Efficiency (CACEE).

4. DEVELOPMENT OF THE 2016-2018 DSM RESOURCE PLAN To aid in the preparation of the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, ENS engaged Navigant and Dunsky Energy Consulting (Dunsky). ENS and NS Power also held ongoing discussions from fall 2014 until...

AI summary ENS engaged Navigant and Dunsky to develop the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, adjusting costs after discussions with NS Power. The plan aimed to minimize program impacts while reducing expenses, with a preliminary overview presented to the DSM Advisory Group in February 2015.

4.1 Development of 2016-2018 DSM Program Targets and Investment The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan has been developed based on ENS's growing experience and history in delivering successful DSM programs and services to Nova Scotians. As part o...

AI summary ENS developed the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan using Navigant Consulting's EL-RAM model, aligning with cost-effective targets and investment levels. The Plan's 405.9 GWh energy savings and 62.5 MW demand savings aim to balance affordability with long-term energy needs, referencing NS Power's 2014 IRP and updated assumptions. ENS emphasizes reduced rate pressures and capacity additions compared to prior scenarios.

2014 IRP No DSM Plan CRP01-01-FGD-R01 CRP2-17 FGD CRP Mid DSM/FGD Half-Low DSM Low DSM Base DSM (Synapse Model) 2015 2016 2017 ML Oct 2017 ML Oct 2017 ML Oct 2017 ML Oct 2017 ML Oct 2017 Lin 2 retire Lin 2 retire Lin 2 retire Lin 2 retire...

AI summary The document outlines a timeline of energy projects and capacity additions up to 2039, along with net present value (NPV) figures and planning study values. It discusses how ENS can build a DSM Plan that balances long-term DSM requirements with avoiding short- to mid-term capacity additions, based on the 2014 IRP analysis.

n its IRP Final Report, NS Power stated that "the risk of underperformance associated with unprecedented levels of DSM may require additional investment in firm capacity, exerting further pressure on power rates." [7](#page-40-0) This stat...

AI summary Maintaining current DSM levels is argued to avoid future rate instability and align with NS Power's 'no regrets strategy.' Reducing DSM now risks higher future DSM needs and steeper rate increases. ENS asserts confidence in achieving IRP-targeted DSM levels but warns against short-term reductions that could force longer-term, higher DSM investments.

6. CONCLUSION The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan provides an evidence-based approach that enables Nova Scotians to achieve reasonably-available, cost-effective electricity energy and demand savings. The plan was developed with emphasis on aff...

AI summary The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan aims to achieve cost-effective electricity savings in Nova Scotia through affordability-focused strategies. ENS seeks UARB approval for the plan, supply agreements, performance metrics, a shift from TRC to PAC cost-effectiveness testing, and a reserve fund establishment.

Appendix A 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan

AI summary Appendix A outlines the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, a component of Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NSPI) Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). The plan focuses on energy efficiency initiatives and programs managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS).

6. ENS'S USE OF THE RESULTS - There are several ways in which ENS expects to use the results of this analysis: - ENS expects the analysis to help to inform ongoing discussions with NS Power and stakeholders in regards to the 2016-2018 DSM...

AI summary ENS plans to use analysis results for discussions with NS Power and stakeholders on the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. It will focus recruitment efforts in specific rate classes while maintaining support for high-participation classes. ENS seeks input on integrating rate/bill impact analysis into other studies.

Assumptions used in ENS's 2016-2018 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis Stakeholder Stakeholder Comment ENSC's Response Inclusion in the model outcome of the IRP. The Industrial Group believes that these are appropriate.

AI summary The Industrial Group supports the assumptions used in ENS's 2016-2018 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis, particularly those related to the outcome of the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP).

- 5. Delivering reliable service at least cost is a fundamental tenet of prudent utility service, and lowering both customer usage and marginal system costs through investments in demand-side resources makes electricity bills more affordab...

AI summary The summary highlights the importance of demand-side management in reducing electricity bills and improving affordability. It emphasizes the benefits of Efficiency Nova Scotia's programs, including environmental, economic, and social advantages. The proposed investment in demand-side resources for 2016–2018 is lower than what was considered in the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan.

balance investments that may only yield results in the long-term – but which may do so handsomely – against short-term efforts that are more certain to generate near-term returns, albeit smaller ones. Given our understanding of ENS' mandat...

AI summary The analysis emphasizes balancing long-term electricity savings initiatives with short-term resource acquisitions, ensuring Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) prioritizes long-term benefits without neglecting its three-year planning cycle. It argues that exclusive focus on short-term gains may miss lower-cost opportunities over Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NSPI) planning horizon, while a reasonable allocation of resources is needed to support delayed initiatives.

REGULATORY DRIVERS While the current effort at DSM in Nova Scotia is relatively new, the province's consideration of DSM dates back over fifteen years. Indeed, in the mid-1990s, in the context of an Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) proce...

AI summary Nova Scotia's DSM evolution spans 15+ years, with UARB using TRC thresholds (0.8 in 1990s, 1.0 in 2006) for DSM evaluation. The 2014 IRP prioritized cumulative revenue requirements over customer costs, while the 2014 Act linked energy efficiency to NSPI cost reduction via PAC. Synapse's analysis excluded customer costs in revenue assessments.

OPTIONS FOR NOVA SCOTIA

AI summary Nova Scotia's regulatory proceeding discusses energy options involving Demand Side Management (DSM), Harmonized Sales Tax (HST), and Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). Key entities include Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB), with KPMG involved in analysis. The proceeding evaluates programs, legislation, and utility regulations.

CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS There are several options available to Nova Scotia to improve the value provided by cost-effectiveness screening of DSM initiatives. Some aim at correcting the problems inherent in the TRC; others propose shif...

AI summary The document evaluates cost-effectiveness screening methods for DSM initiatives in Nova Scotia, critiquing the Total Resource Cost (TRC) approach and advocating for the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) framework. It highlights PAC's alignment with Nova Scotia's Electricity Efficiency and Conservation plan, its transparency, and stakeholder familiarity. Concerns with TRC include methodological challenges, misalignment with the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), and inadequate benefit accounting.

- NMR Group Inc. (2011). Massachusetts Special and Cross-Sector Studies Area, Residential and Low-Income Non-Energy Impacts (NEI) Evaluation. - Northwest Power and Conservation Council. (2010). Sixt Northwest Conservation and Electric Powe...

AI summary The text lists references to energy efficiency studies, legislative acts, and regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia and other regions. Key documents include NSPI's DSM proposal, the 2014 Electric Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring Act, and Synapse Energy Economics' commentary on NSPI's Integrated Resource Plan. References also include studies on non-energy impacts and conservation planning.

3.3 Pilot Documentation As part of the evaluation, the Evaluator analyzed the program documentation and worked together with the PM to improve and revise the program manual, the evaluation plan and the logic model, where applicable. More s...

AI summary The Evaluator reviewed pilot documentation for Residential Financing and worked with the Program Manager to revise program materials. Key issues included the need to address barriers like low creditworthiness and the inclusion of alternative financing sources. The Evaluator recommends integrating Residential Financing documentation into Green Heat, Solar, and HEA programs and using a workflow checklist in the Data Management System to improve administrative procedures.

3.11.3 Market Share Estimate The approach was to use data available from Statistics Canada pertaining to the value of building permits for both residential and small commercial facilities in the province. For 2014, data is available until...

AI summary This section discusses the method used to estimate market share by analyzing building permit data from Statistics Canada for residential and small commercial facilities in Nova Scotia, with data available up to October 2014.

ons improve. Figure 1: The Demand-Side Management Cycle. The arrows in Figure 1 show the direction of the primary flow of activity within a DSM cycle. Each step in the Demand-Side Management Cycle feeds information forward to the Planning...

AI summary The document outlines the Demand-Side Management (DSM) cycle, emphasizing continuous planning, implementation, and evaluation. Planning involves periodic major efforts every 3-5 years, while implementation adapts to real-time challenges. Evaluation provides feedback for corrections and informs future planning. The cycle integrates data tracking and iterative adjustments to align programs with evolving conditions.

re appropriate for different situations. Two of these types produce substantial energy savings forward in time over multiple years and one does not. The types are not equivalent in the time dimension. (2) Second, the origins of Demand Side...

AI summary The text discusses the evolution of Demand-Side Management (DSM), its origins in Resource Planning, and historical distinctions between energy conservation programs and DSM. It highlights the shift in utility approaches from load retention/building to customer-side efficiency, and references market transformation strategies developed in Sweden and generalized DSM methodologies.

L. Residential Financing (No Impact Evaluation) This is a zero interest buy-down program with sixty-six participants in 2014. Program savings are allocated to other programs (HEA, Solar and Green Heat). The financing enables all necessary...

AI summary A zero-interest residential financing program with 66 participants in 2014 was evaluated as pivotal in enabling energy improvements. Savings were allocated to other programs (HEA, Solar, Green Heat). Process evaluation via interviews confirmed participants would have postponed work without financing. Questions remain about cost-effectiveness and reliance on behavioral savings for resource planning.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-32: 2 3 (a) Please explain in detail how new codes and standards are included in, or affect, E1’s 4 long term planning. 5 6 (b) Have past energy/demand savings figures been amended for subsequently adopted 7 c...

AI summary The response explains that ENS incorporates new energy codes and standards into NSPI’s Integrated Resource Planning process. It highlights that DSM potential studies account for these codes, and their effects are modeled as percent changes in savings over time.

7 Navigant, 2014 IRP, Nova Scotia 2015 ‐ 2040 Demand Side Management (DSM) Potential Study , Presented to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, NSUARB M05522/P-884.14, January 7, 2014. 1 period, customer impacts can be mitigated by implement...

AI summary The text references a 2014 Demand Side Management (DSM) Potential Study conducted by Navigant as part of the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) for Nova Scotia. It mentions the study was presented to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and filed with the Utility and Review Board (UARB) under matter number NSUARB M05522/P-884.14.

17 3.3 Affordability from a System Planning Perspective 18 19 Through the course of the 2014 IRP, the Company analyzed revenue requirements 20 resulting from a variety of different DSM profiles. NS Power has further considered the 21 affor...

AI summary NS Power analyzed the affordability of DSM profiles via NPV of revenue requirements over time horizons. The $22M annual DSM plan (Contract Period) yields the lowest long-term NPV beyond 2030, while the $25M plan (CRP 1-1) is more affordable in the short term. NS Power argues this balances cost-effectiveness and rate stability.

1 4.0 ANALYSIS OF NS POWER'S DSM REQUIREMENTS 2 3 4.1 NS Power System Requirements 4 5 The 2014 IRP tested 3 alternative levels of DSM expenditure with capacity and energy 6 savings based on ENS's DSM potential study with 25 year spending...

AI summary The 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) tested three levels of Demand Side Management (DSM) expenditure, with capacity and energy savings based on ENS's DSM potential study. It did not aim to optimize annual DSM spending but indicated that a more detailed examination of DSM would follow to prepare a near-term plan. Figure 4.1 shows that DSM savings of about 100 GWh per year could allow NS Power to avoid adding generation capacity until 2032.

Figure 4.1: NS Power System Requirements Based on 2014 IRP Assumptions 44 1 2014 IRP No DSM Plan CRP01-01-FGD-R01 Low DSM CRP2-17 FGD CRP Mid DSM/FGD Half-Low DSM Base DSM (Synapse Model) 2015 2016 2017 ML Oct 2017 ML Oct 2017 ML Oct 2017...

AI summary This table outlines NS Power's system requirements based on the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) assumptions, comparing different scenarios including the implementation of a Demand Side Management (DSM) plan. It includes details on power generation, infrastructure projects, and net present value (NPV) figures for various years.

4 The CRP analysis process used in the 2014 IRP did not offer full optimization 5 opportunities but was rather an approach to test a range of DSM scenarios. The detailed 6 analysis undertaken through this proceeding provides a critical ste...

AI summary The text discusses the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan's CRP analysis process and its limitations, emphasizing the need for a more optimized approach. NS Power recommends moderate DSM investment, targeting 100 GWh/year in energy savings and associated demand savings, to avoid additional generation capacity until 2032. Demand-response DSM programs are suggested for future consideration based on cost and economics.

5.0 ALTERNATIVE DSM PLAN

AI summary The section outlines an alternative Demand Side Management (DSM) plan, referencing regulatory entities and prior planning documents. Key entities include the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) and ICF International, with acronyms like IRP and DSM central to the discussion.

5.1 NS Power's Alternative DSM Plan E1 did not develop or model any DSM investment scenarios lower than that contained in the proposed E1 DSM Plan. NS Power had requested E1 develop different plan scenarios, including one within an annual...

AI summary NS Power requested E1 (NSPI) to model lower DSM investment scenarios but was declined. E1's analysis lacks quantitative evaluation of lower expenditure options, limiting informed decision-making. NS Power proposes an alternative DSM plan aligned with Canadian benchmarks, emphasizing affordability and cost-effectiveness.

1 I. INTRODUCTION - 2 Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. - 3 A. My name is David K. Pickles. My business address is 7160 North Dallas - 4 Parkway, Suite 340, Plano, Texas 75024. I am employed by ICF - 5 International ("ICF"), as Senior Vice Presid...

AI summary David K. Pickles, Senior Vice President of ICF International, testifies on behalf of Nova Scotia Power Inc. before the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board. He outlines his 25-year experience in Demand Side Management (DSM) programs, energy efficiency initiatives, and integrated resource planning across multiple U.S. states.

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT

AI summary The document heading 'SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT' is accompanied by a list of acronyms and their expansions relevant to Nova Scotia's energy regulatory proceedings, including organizations, programs, and legislative terms. No substantive content or arguments are present in the provided text.

Appendix B References 2011 Efficiency Maine Annual Report, http://www.efficiencymaine.com/docs/2011AnnualͲReport.pdf, Accessed January 29, 2015 2012Ͳ2013 Efficiency New Brunswick Annual Report, http://0101.nccdn.net/1_5/250/0f8/0fb/2012Ͳ13...

AI summary Appendix B lists references to annual reports, studies, and applications related to energy efficiency and resource planning in Nova Scotia and other provinces. Documents include Efficiency Maine and New Brunswick reports, BC Hydro resource options, and EECA supply agreements, highlighting regulatory and programmatic efforts in energy conservation and integrated resource planning.

Schedule B

AI summary Schedule B from the Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding document lists acronyms and their expansions relevant to energy efficiency, utility regulation, and resource planning. It includes organizations, programs, and regulatory frameworks involved in Nova Scotia's electricity sector.

Request IR-1: 2 1 3 Reference: 2016-2018 DSM Plan NS Power Evidence Appendix B 4 - 5 NSPI has proposed a DSM spending of approximately $22 per year for the years 2016- - 6 2018. How was an annual DSM budget of $22 million determined to be...

AI summary NS Power justifies a $22 million annual DSM budget for 2016-2018 by aligning with the 2014 IRP and Public Utilities Act, using ELRAM scenarios, and citing consistency with Canadian jurisdictions' per-customer spending.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 2 Projects that are known to have been cancelled or delayed due to insufficient load growth 3 include one transmission project and one distribution project. George Street (CI45306) 4 substation was deferred due to delaye...

AI summary The text discusses two projects that were delayed or cancelled due to insufficient load growth: the George Street substation and the Load Transfer project. The deferral of the Harbour East substation was attributed to industrial load loss instead of insufficient load growth.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-21: 2 3 Please provide the rated capacity (in MW) NS Power assumed for: 4 5 (a) NRIS wind 6 7 (b) ERIS wind, 8 9 (c) Port Hawkesbury biomass. 10 11 Response IR-21: 12 13 (a-c) Please refer to the table below,...

AI summary The document includes a request for the rated capacity in MW assumed by NS Power for three different energy projects: NRIS wind, ERIS wind, and Port Hawkesbury biomass. The response directs the reader to a table based on the 2014 IRP assumptions.

15 Capacity Value (%) Year NRIS wind ERIS wind PH Biomass 2015 17 0 0 2016 17 0 0 2017-2038 17 0 0 2039 17 0 100 16 17 \ Note: The biomass plant is not counted as firm capacity until a second Lingan unit is retired in a particular resource...

AI summary The table outlines the capacity value percentages for different energy resources from 2015 to 2039. The biomass plant's capacity value is set to 100% starting in 2039, contingent on the retirement of a second Lingan unit in a specific resource plan.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-23: 2 3 Please provide any progress that NS Power has made in estimating the capacity value of 4 wind and ERIS resources since the Final 2014 IRP, and its schedule for improving these 5 estimates. 6 7 Response...

AI summary NS Power is evaluating the capacity value of wind and ERIS resources using methods like LOLE and Cumulative Frequency Analysis, with plans to continue these evaluations in 2015 and 2016, and report progress in the 10 Year System Outlook Report.

1 Please refer to 2014 Integrated Resource Plan, NS Power Final Report, October 15, 2014, pages 66 – 82. Date Filed: May 19, 2015 15

AI summary The text references the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan and NS Power Final Report, providing context for a regulatory proceeding. It includes a date of May 19, 2015, indicating the filing of a document.

1 - 4 After demonstrating that approximately $22 million of DSM spending was the amount that was - 5 appropriate from a system planning perspective in accordance with the IRP, was aligned with - 6 spending in other jurisdictions and could...

AI summary The document discusses the 2016-2018 DSM Plan and references a proceeding (NSUARB M06733) where NSPI requested the UARB to direct E1 to provide a more cost-effective and affordable plan, citing evidence that approximately $22 million in DSM spending was appropriate based on the IRP and spending in other jurisdictions.

8 Figures Attachment Figure 3.1: Recent and Projected DSM Spending by Canadian Province Attachment 1, also filed electronically Revised Figure 3.2: 2015 First Year Cost Comparison ($/kWh of Planned Please refer to SBA IR Savings) 14 Attach...

AI summary The document includes various figures and attachments related to demand-side management (DSM) spending, cost comparisons, and system requirements based on the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). These materials are used to support the analysis and discussion of energy efficiency and demand-side management strategies in Nova Scotia.

CRP Mid/FGD Hall LOW Dase CRF WIIU/FGD CRP CRP1-1-FGD CRP2-17-FGD No DSM Plan (Synapse) Low DSM Plan 2015 651,665 673,694 630,259 678,476 649,093 2016 667,940 685,619 650,149 689,420 662,626 2017 701,354 714,414 687,222 718,278 693,524 201...

AI summary The document presents a table with various CRP (Capacity Resource Plan) scenarios, including different DSM (Demand Side Management) plans, and their associated load values over multiple years. The data shows varying levels of energy demand and capacity requirements, with different scenarios (e.g., 'Hall LOW', 'Dase', 'Low DSM Plan') and associated figures for each year from 2015 to 2039.

& lt;sup>1 NS Power 2014 Final IRP Report, Matter Number M05522, October 15, 2014, page 8, lines 16-18. 2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary The text references the 2014 Final IRP Report by NS Power and the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, along with NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate. These documents are part of regulatory proceedings under Matter Numbers M05522 and M06733.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 (c) Please refer to Attachment 2. 2 3 (d) The difference between the results shown in Figure 4.1 and Slide 26 of the 2014 IRP 4 Technical Conference Analysis Results (September 12, 2014) is the inclusion of the 5 sustain...

AI summary The text refers to differences in sustaining capital costs between figures and slides in the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) analysis. It explains that sustaining capital costs were omitted from Figure 4.1 for relative comparison purposes, while Slide 26 includes them. The text also directs readers to other attachments and references for further details.

Avoided Cost of DSM - 2014 IRP Candidate Resource Plans

AI summary The document discusses the avoided cost of demand-side management (DSM) in the context of the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) candidate resource plans, highlighting the role of DSM in reducing energy costs and improving efficiency.

Notes: These resource plans are based on 2014 IRP assumptions. Plans could be further optimized based on more recent assumptions for the near term. Half-Low DSM - Mersey Expansion not required for capacity. Added for economics. No capacity...

AI summary Resource plans based on 2014 IRP assumptions suggest no capacity additions until 2024 under Half-Low DSM, with Mersey Expansion not required. A PPA for RES is needed in 2023 but is oversized. Lingan unit retirement may free transmission for PH Biomass. Plans may be optimized with updated assumptions.

Breakout of Dollars by Energy, Capacity, and DSM Program Administrator Costs 2014 IRP No DSN 4 Dian CRP-01-F GD-R01 Low DCM CRP2-1 7 FGD CRP Mid DSM/FGD NO DSI VI PIAII Half-Low DSM Low DSM Base DSM (Synapse Model) Total Cost Capacity Ener...

AI summary The document provides a breakout of costs associated with energy, capacity, and Demand Side Management (DSM) Program Administrator costs under various Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) scenarios. It includes Net Present Value (NPV) and Planning PV figures for different years and scenarios, highlighting the allocation of costs across capacity, energy, and DSM PA.

2014 IRP Draft Analysis Results\ LOW DSM \ These are indicative results from a high level planning perspective. Can only be used to provide guidance and direction. This is not a prescriptive solution.

AI summary The 2014 IRP Draft Analysis Results present non-binding, high-level guidance for energy planning with low Demand Side Management (DSM) focus. The analysis emphasizes that these results are indicative and not a prescriptive solution for regulatory decisions.

Low DSM Case: - Base Load Forecast - Low DSM - Emissions Scenario A - Planned and committed resources are fixed in the plan (REA wind, COMFIT, Maritime Link/ Retire Lin #2) - Maximum Coal Use - Constraints - Planning reserve margin min = 2...

AI summary The Low DSM Case outlines a scenario with fixed planned resources (REA wind, COMFIT, Maritime Link/Retire Lin #2), constraints on planning reserve margins (minimum 20%), and renewable energy standards (RES) targets (25% for 2015-2019, 40% for 2020-2039). It includes emissions scenario analysis and maximum coal use considerations.

Low DSM Preliminary Load and Resources 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2030 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 Firm Peak 1,963 1,986 2,000 2,020 2,041 2,066 2,077 2,097 2,118 2,147 2,159 2,251 2,345 2,364 2,383 2,403 2,422 DSM...

AI summary The document presents a table analyzing low DSM (Demand Side Management) preliminary load and resources over multiple years, showing trends in firm peak demand, DSM contributions, required and existing MWs, resource additions, and surplus/deficit MWs above RM (Required Margin). It also includes data on reserve margins and capacity additions.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL Total System Energy Requirement Total System Peak Load Year (GWh) (MW) 2025 11,220 2,219 2026 11,330 2,239 2027 11,428 2,256 2028 11,558 2,281 2029 11,629 2,293 2030 11,730 2,311 2031 11,832 2,330 2032 11,936 2,349 2033 12...

AI summary The document presents a table showing projected total system energy requirements and peak loads from 2025 to 2039, indicating a steady increase in both energy demand and peak load over time.

2 (b) Confirmed. The "No DSM" forecast is based on the load forecast provided in the 2014 3 IRP Assumptions and as such does not include any new DSM spending beyond and 4 including 2015. Energy efficiency improvements due to factors such a...

AI summary The 'No DSM' forecast assumes no new demand-side management spending beyond 2015 and incorporates energy efficiency improvements from code and standard changes. It reflects the absence of DSM savings by the administrator and includes non-administrator DSM as reflected in the IRP load forecast.

2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to Multeese Information Requests 1 Request IR-15: 5 that the information contained in Attachment C be applied. 6 7 Response IR-16: 8 9 Schedule A of the Supply Agreement between E1 and NS P...

AI summary The document outlines NSPI's responses to information requests regarding the 2016-2018 DSM Plan. It discusses the use of Schedule A in the Supply Agreement, the role of the Public Utilities Act, and the methodology for calculating avoided costs. The document also references load forecasting, production cost modelling, and rate planning.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-2: 5 purposes as conserved kWh from primarily technical (equipment based) DSM programs, 6 technical/regulatory DSM programs, or generated kWh? 7 8 Response IR-4: 9 10 NS Power has insufficient data to determin...

AI summary The document discusses NS Power's response to requests regarding the reliability of energy savings from behavioral demand-side management (DSM) programs and the use of discounting factors in power planning. NS Power states that behavioral programs like the Home Energy Report are less reliable than technical programs and does not apply discounting factors in its power planning process.

R IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT -and- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION for Approval of a Supply Agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, the estab...

AI summary The document outlines an application for approval of a supply agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, establishment of a final agreement, and approval of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan. Key parties include applicants, counsel, and advocates involved in the regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act.

3.5.2.1 Findings [71] The CA summarized his view of the purpose of a DSM program: The basic purpose is to reduce the level of energy required by Nova Scotia in the future, both short and long term. DSM programs are an integral component in...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate emphasizes the importance of DSM programs in reducing energy demand and supporting Nova Scotia's energy strategy. The Board expresses concerns with NSPI's plan, noting reduced residential spending and a disconnect with the IRP, while favoring El's plan for better alignment with the PUA and long-term cost savings.

3.5.4 Relationship of the Proposed 201 6-18 DSM Plan to the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan [94] During a 10-month period in 2014, NSPI developed a new IRP in collaboration with Board Staff and consultants, and in consultation with intereste...

AI summary NSPI's 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) emphasized demand-side management (DSM) to achieve cost-effective energy savings. The proposed 2016-18 DSM Plan aligns with the IRP's 'mid-DSM' scenario, which projects higher savings (519 GWh over 3 years) compared to prior DSM plans (397 GWh). The IRP process aims to balance supply-side and demand-side resources for long-term ratepayer savings.

Schedule E EECA Plan (2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan) This page has been intentionally left blank

AI summary The document is a placeholder for the EECA Plan (2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan) under Schedule E of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, indicating the page was intentionally left blank.

NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: EfficiencyOne (E1) application for approval of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board is considering EfficiencyOne's (E1) application for approval of its 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan, which outlines strategies to manage energy demand and improve efficiency in the province.

isition of all available energy efficiency and demand reduction resources that are cost effective or less expensive than supply…". 17 These plans must address a large number of requirements:

AI summary The Public Utilities Act (PUA) emphasizes affordability by prioritizing cost-effective energy efficiency and demand reduction resources over supply options. Integrated resource plans (IRPs) must address multiple requirements, including demand-side management (DSM) strategies.

Short on Options 24. The IRP was an important starting point in the development of the E1 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. 36 The Province agrees that this is an important consideration, but one must be mindful of 33 NSPI has noted that energy...

AI summary The Province critiques E1's DSM plan for relying too heavily on the IRP without adequately addressing affordability and long-term capacity needs. E1's plan avoids significant generation capacity additions until 2032 but may not align with the IRP's broader goals. The Province argues E1 could have provided alternative scenarios for affordability discussions, while E1 cites resource constraints.

The Inherent Flexibility of DSM 29. The adjustability of DSM was noted by several witnesses in the proceeding, including Mr. Sampson who commented: MR. SAMPSON: I'd say for a resource like DSM, which has flexibility where there are numerou...

AI summary The document highlights DSM's flexibility compared to traditional resources, citing witnesses like Mr. Sampson and Philippe Dunsky. E1's track record of meeting targets under budget is noted, with arguments that adjusting DSM budgets may not compromise savings. Affordability and capacity requirements are emphasized as key considerations.

45 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan (M06733), Transcript, June 15, 2015, pages 112-114, lines 12-22; lines 1-22; and lines 1-3. 1 system an additional 500 GWh and more than supplements any potential shortfalls in 15 of DSM an...

AI summary The transcript discusses the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, highlighting NS Power's conservative approach to DSM, which avoids additional capital expenditures for 17 years. It also mentions the possibility of recalibrating DSM in three years if the economic and energy landscape changes.

& lt;sup>55 Exhibit E-68, EfficiencyOne Response to Undertaking 7, June 24, 2015, (PDF) page 116. 1 10.0 E1'S POSITION 2 3 E1 ra sises a number of other arguments in support of its position which are addressed 4 below v. 5 6 10.1 2014 IRP...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) argues that the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) should guide the energy savings and expenditure levels for the DSM Plan. However, NS Power's rebuttal evidence challenges the use of a 25-year time horizon from the 2014 IRP, citing that it is not appropriate for the Contract Period due to uncertainty in long-term resource additions and the adequacy of near-term DSM measures.

1 asset with a useful life of 25 years or more, it does not optimize DSM levels. A similar 2 view with respect to the use of the IRP for DSM planning purposes was expressed by the 3 IG, which stated in its Opening Statement as follows: 4 5...

AI summary The document discusses the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and its applicability to Demand Side Management (DSM) planning, highlighting the IRP's long-term nature and its limitations in addressing short-term DSM needs. The Industrial Group (IG) argues that the IRP is not suited for DSM due to its lack of flexibility and affordability considerations, while NS Power cites examples from other jurisdictions using shorter IRP periods.

Exhibit E-60, Best Practices in Electric Utility Integrated Resource Planning Examples of State Regulations and Recent Utility Plans (Synapse), filed by NS Power, June 15, 2015. 1 examination from the Board that industry capacity was one o...

AI summary NS Power argues that the impact of DSM infrastructure on industry capacity should not be considered when determining DSM spending levels, citing the Public Utilities Act's focus on customer affordability and best interests. NS Power's expert testified that DSM capacity should fluctuate based on demand, similar to generation capacity.

eement - 31 investment level, the energy savings will be realized at 62 percent of the Mid-DSM investment 1 level (89 percent of the Low-DSM level of investment). In addition to providing significant - 2 energy benefits, EfficiencyOne's DS...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's DSM Plan offers lower unit costs, avoids new capacity additions until 2032, and balances short-term and long-term affordability. It aligns with the Public Utilities Act and stakeholder endorsements. NS Power's alternative scenario is criticized for lacking this balance. The plan maintains energy efficiency industry stability and provides near-term and long-term benefits.

15 OUTSTANDING ISSUES OF DSM SUPPLY AGREEMENT 16

AI summary The document outlines outstanding issues related to the Demand Side Management (DSM) supply agreement, potentially involving the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). Key topics include demand-side management and supply agreements, with no specific claims or cross-references provided.

e legislation, EfficiencyOne 25 proceeded to develop what it considered to be the appropriate DSM Plan for the contract period 26 2016-2018. In doing so, it relied upon a number of factors, including: 27 - 28 (1) The franchise holder's his...

AI summary EfficiencyOne developed a DSM Plan for 2016-2018, considering factors like NS Power's market knowledge, the 2014 IRP, affordability, NS Power feedback, and DSM system viability. Legal references include the Public Utilities Act and Exhibit 33.

50 Public Utilities Act , RSNS 1989, c 380, ss 79L (8) & (9). 1 In developing its DSM Resource Plan Application for 2016-2018, EfficiencyOne considered 2 affordability. The CEO of EfficiencyOne stated in his opening statement: 3 4 The 2016...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan Application emphasizes affordability, highlighting cost-effectiveness, long-term savings, and alignment with Nova Scotia Power's Integrated Resource Plan. The plan aims to ensure long-term affordability for Nova Scotians by incorporating energy efficiency as a key supply strategy.

1 EfficiencyOne has factored in affordability to its Quantum Agreement investment level of 2 $113.5 million: 3 4 • It is $69 million, or 38 percent, less (over the three-year term) than the Mid-DSM level of 5 the IRP's Preferred Resource P...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's Quantum Agreement investment level of $113.5 million is significantly lower than previous DSM investment levels and aims to balance short and long-term affordability. It avoids new capacity additions until 2032 and ensures a balanced participation across sectors.

htened 4 attention to the consideration of affordability was expressly considered in EfficiencyOne's Plan 5 development and was specifically noted by Ms. Vincent during the NS Power cross-examination: When we looked at the concept of affor...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's Plan balanced long-term benefits of higher DSM (per IRP) against short-term rate impacts, repurposed 2014 DSM funds for FAM repayment, and emphasized stable DSM investment to ensure rate stability, as explained by Ms. Vincent during NSP cross-examination.

CONCLUSION 2 1 - 3 EfficiencyOne respectfully requests an Order from the Board approving: - 4 (1) The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan 88 , as modified by the terms of the Quantum - 5 Agreement and the Consensus Agreement as applicable; and - 6...

AI summary EfficiencyOne requests the Board to approve the modified 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan and related agreements, including the Supply Agreement and its schedules.

(a) Proposed Target Energy and Demand Savings Are Not Needed - 10. There is no dispute that, from the perspective of NSPI's system, E1's targeted energy and demand savings are not needed during the contract period. As shown in figure 4.1 (...

AI summary NSPI argues that E1's proposed energy and demand savings targets are unnecessary during the contract period, as existing DSM measures can avoid additional generation capacity until 2032. E1 did not dispute this for 2016–2018, and both low and base DSM scenarios require similar capacity additions until 2032.

(b) No System Risks by Not Undertaking Higher Levels of DSM 13. The Industrial Group explored with the NSPI panel what the risks would be if the DSM energy savings were set at the low level. In response to questions, NSPI indicated that th...

AI summary The Industrial Group and NSPI argue that setting DSM energy savings at low levels poses no system requirement or RES compliance risks between 2016-2018. NSPI claims capital investments for new capacity or renewables can be avoided until 2032 with a 100 GWh/year DSM plan. The Industrial Group opposes higher DSM investment, citing lack of risks.

from 22 percent to 35 percent (average quarterly results)." In fact, in recognition of the increased awareness of E1, E1 plans that this aspect of its advertising budget will be decreased in 2015. 15 - 23. In terms of the other potential i...

AI summary The text argues that scaling back DSM funding won't cause steep rate increases, citing the IRP's findings. E1 plans to reduce advertising spending, while Mr. Drazen emphasizes Nova Scotia's 'efficiency culture' and past cost management strategies. The IRP also shows no system need for higher DSM levels.

(III) AFFORDABILITY - 59. All participants have spoken about affordability and what it means. The Industrial Group wishes to make it clear that it does not favour short-term affordability at the expense of long-term risks. The Industrial G...

AI summary The Industrial Group emphasizes balancing short-term and long-term affordability, advocating for a 10-20 year IRP horizon and regular reviews of DSM spending. They note NSPI's existing rate capacity for DSM and recommend future transparency and scenario modeling by E1 and NSPI.

Exhibit E-1, EfficiencyOne Evidence, Page 21, Figure 3.1. 13 Transcript, June 19, Page 925, Lines 16-19. IRP periods in other jurisdictions is largely due to the increasing level of uncertainty the further out in time one tries to predict/...

AI summary The text discusses planning horizons for Integrated Resource Planning (IRP), critiquing NS Power's approach and referencing Synapse's report. It highlights Oregon's 20-year planning period with an end effects period, contrasting with Arizona's 15-year and Colorado's variable periods. Fuel costs and financial benefits for customers under the E1 DSM Plan are also addressed, noting a 19-year timeline for financial improvement.

RISKS TO THE EFFICIENCY INDUSTRY IN NOVA SCOTIA Both NS Power and the Industrial Group have argued that loss of industry capacity should not be taken into account by the Board in determining the appropriate level of DSM spending for the Co...

AI summary NS Power and the Industrial Group argue that industry capacity loss should not influence DSM spending decisions. EfficiencyOne and Mr. Dunsky counter that sustained market presence is critical for long-term credibility, supplier trust, and resilience against future DSM needs. They emphasize that short-term fluctuations should not undermine long-term investment in market transformation.

CONCLUSION For the reasons set out herein, along with its earlier submissions and evidence, EfficiencyOne continues to respectfully request an Order from the Board approving: (1) The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan[44](#page-24-1) , as modifie...

AI summary EfficiencyOne requests the Board approve the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan modified by the Quantum and Consensus Agreements, the Supply Agreement, and its schedules. The request is based on prior submissions and evidence.

R IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT -and- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION for Approval of a Supply Agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, the estab...

AI summary The document outlines a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act regarding an application by EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for approval of a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities, and the establishment of a final agreement and a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan.

he $53 million that was in rates for DSM in 2014 and which amount was subsequently repurposed by Order of the Board for 2015 fuel expenses. It expanded on these points in its post-hearing submission: - It is $69 million, or 38 percent. les...

AI summary The document discusses the repurposing of a $53 million DSM rate allocation from 2014 for 2015 fuel expenses, and how the proposed DSM investment level balances short and long-term affordability. It emphasizes the cost-effectiveness of the Mid-DSM scenario in the IRP and contrasts the proposed plan with NS Power's alternative, which relies heavily on energy savings from the BNI sector.

3.5.2.1 Findings [71] The CA summarized his view of the purpose of a DSM program: The basic purpose is to reduce the level of energy required by Nova Scotia in the future, both short and long term. DSM programs are an integral component in...

AI summary The CA emphasizes the importance of DSM programs in reducing energy demand and supporting Nova Scotia's energy strategy. The Board criticizes the NSPI Plan for significantly reducing residential DSM spending and disconnecting from the IRP's long-term cost-saving goals. The El Plan is viewed as more aligned with the PUA and IRP, though concerns remain about past underspending and overachievement of energy savings targets by El.

3.5.4 Relationship of the Proposed 201 6-18 DSM Plan to the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan [94] During a 10-month period in 2014, NSPI developed a new IRP in collaboration with Board Staff and consultants, and in consultation with intereste...

AI summary The document discusses the development of the 2016-18 DSM Plan in relation to the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), noting that the mid-DSM scenario in the 2014 IRP aimed for higher energy savings than previous DSM plans. The IRP process seeks to balance supply-side and demand-side resources to serve electrical needs at the lowest long-term cost to ratepayers.

1.1 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment Figure 1.1.1 provides a summary of the energy savings and investment for the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan.

AI summary The text references Figure 1.1.1, which summarizes energy savings and investment data for the 2016-2018 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. The figure provides an overview of savings and investment metrics under the DSM program during this period.

4.3 Other Enabling Strategies

AI summary Section 4.3 discusses 'Other Enabling Strategies' in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, referencing various programs, regulatory bodies, and acronyms related to energy management and resource planning.

24. SHARING OF DATA AND INFORMATION - 24.1 EfficiencyOne shall work co-operatively with NSPI to provide NSPI with information and data from time to time in order to assist NSPI with planning and load forecasting as may be reasonably requir...

AI summary EfficiencyOne must cooperate with NSPI to provide data for planning and load forecasting, aligning with past practices. NSPI may seek UARB intervention if disputes arise over data access requests.

Schedule E EECA Plan (2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan)

AI summary Schedule E presents the EECA Plan (2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan), outlining demand-side management initiatives under Nova Scotia's regulatory proceeding. The plan focuses on electricity efficiency and conservation programs managed by EECA.

Schedule E EECA Plan (2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan) This page has been intentionally left blank

AI summary Schedule E references the EECA's 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. The page is intentionally left blank, indicating no further details or content provided in this section of the regulatory proceeding document.

SCHEDULE B Consensus Agreement WEPUBUC UTILITIESACT An application by EfficiencyOneforApproval ofaSupply Agreementfor Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia PowerInc., the establishment ofo...

AI summary EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) seek approval for a Supply Agreement and the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. The Consensus Agreement outlines terms approved by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB), with parties reserving the right to amend positions based on further evidence. Key stakeholders include the Consumer Advocate, Small Business Advocate, and Ecology Action Centre.

4) COST ALLOCATION 1111 - a) The Parties agree to collaboratively work to develop new DSM cost allocation and DSM cost recovery models to be submitted by October 31, 2015 for approval or Decision by the Board, or within a reasonable period...

AI summary Parties agree to collaboratively develop DSM cost allocation and recovery models by October 31, 2015, covering 2015, 2016-2018, a 2014 rate-smoothing adjustment, and mid-course adjustments. The agreement clarifies that Nova Scotia Power retains discretion to apply to the UARB regarding DSM cost accounting and recovery.

Partner Troy is an advisory services partner based in our Toronto office, specializing in Corporate Finance and Infrastructure.

AI summary Troy is an advisory services partner based in Toronto, specializing in Corporate Finance and Infrastructure. The text provides background on Troy's professional role and expertise within the firm.

and stakeholder presentations to the Board of Directors and City Council. - In 2013, acted as engagement partner in advising on the strategy development for a power distribution utility in regards to - evaluating options for acquisition, m...

AI summary The text outlines professional engagements in utility and infrastructure sectors, including advising on acquisitions, financial modeling for power projects, and participation in regulatory rate hearings. Key roles involve Newfoundland Public Utilities Commission, Metrolinx, and renewable energy projects, with emphasis on financial strategies and stakeholder presentations.