Topic:"Integrated Resource Plan" in M06733

1 2. 2014 DSM RESULTS 2

AI summary This section discusses the 2014 Demand Side Management (DSM) results, involving Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) and Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), under regulatory oversight by the Utility and Ratepayer Board (UARB). Key entities include KPMG and references to the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP).

4.1 Development of 2016-2018 DSM Program Targets and Investment The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan has been developed based on ENS's growing experience and history in delivering successful DSM programs and services to Nova Scotians. As part o...

AI summary ENS developed the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan using Navigant Consulting's EL-RAM model, aligning with cost-effective targets and investment levels. The Plan's 405.9 GWh energy savings and 62.5 MW demand savings aim to balance affordability with long-term energy needs, referencing NS Power's 2014 IRP and updated assumptions. ENS emphasizes reduced rate pressures and capacity additions compared to prior scenarios.

oss of a competitive market for DSM implementation contractors is a risk if DSM activity levels are reduced below a • Steep rate increases in the future: When higher levels of DSM are required in the - level that sustains having multiple d...

AI summary Reducing DSM activity risks losing competitive market advantages, increasing future costs, and reducing energy savings for Nova Scotians. ENS argues maintaining DSM capacity is cost-efficient, while NS Power highlights risks of underperformance requiring additional investments. Program reductions may lead to higher fixed costs and lower bill savings.

4.1.3 Affordability The Province of Nova Scotia issued an Electricity Review Report on February 18, 2015, which states that a "large part of Nova Scotia's electricity future relates to increasing energy efficiency. One of the best ways to...

AI summary The Province of Nova Scotia's 2015 Electricity Review Report emphasizes energy efficiency and affordability. ENS's 2016-2018 DSM plan reduces short-term costs compared to the Mid-DSM Scenario while preserving long-term benefits, balancing affordability and efficiency.

Overall Assumptions Differing from previous years, this rate and bill impact analysis is forward-looking and does not present historical results from 2011-2014. There are some instances however, that historical data were utilized; their sp...

AI summary The analysis is forward-looking, using ENS's 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan and Navigant Consulting's EL-RAM model. It incorporates the 2014 IRP's energy forecasts up to 2040 provided by NS Power, with benefits extending 16 years beyond the plan's timeframe. Historical data is selectively used where relevant.

Alternative DSM Scenarios Alternative Scenarios explore the effect of varying levels of DSM investment. DSM Potential Study data ($M and GWh) for the Low, Base, and Mid-DSM Scenarios over 2016-2018 were used to inform the model with respec...

AI summary The analysis evaluates alternative DSM investment scenarios (Low, Base, Mid, and NS Power's 50% Low IRP) to assess energy savings impacts. ENS's proposed Plan is compared against these scenarios, with the Base scenario omitted due to similarity. NS Power's 50% Low Scenario, not vetted by ENS, uses conservative avoided costs. The model assumes 75% of energy savings changes stem from participant numbers, with 25% from adoption depth, capped at 100% participation.

Investing in Demand-side Resources: Considering Affordability

AI summary The document examines the integration of demand-side resources in Nova Scotia's energy strategy, emphasizing affordability. It discusses balancing cost-effective energy efficiency programs with consumer affordability, involving entities like Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), while considering regulatory frameworks and stakeholder input.

1.2 Summary of Findings - 1. Since 2011, excluding 2015, Nova Scotia has invested in demand-side resources at or above the level (in real terms) proposed by ENS in the 2016-2018 Demand-Side Resource Plan. - 2. Demand-side resource investme...

AI summary Nova Scotia's demand-side resource investments since 2011 (excluding 2015) meet or exceed ENS's 2016-2018 plan. These investments yield over $200M in net benefits, enhance affordability, and reduce Nova Scotia Power's revenue requirements. DSM is highlighted as cost-effective, with the Province's plan emphasizing its role in improving electricity affordability and economic competitiveness.

2.1 Investments in Demand-side Resources Demand-side management (DSM) is recognized as a highly cost-effective electricity supply resource.[10](#page-193-3) For Nova Scotians, DSM has reduced customer electricity costs, provided substantia...

AI summary Demand-side management (DSM) is highlighted as a cost-effective electricity resource, reducing customer costs and providing economic and system benefits since 2008. ENS's proposed investments are projected to yield over $200 million in ratepayer benefits. Jurisdictions in Canada and the U.S. recognize DSM's value, with some requiring utilities to procure all cost-effective demand-side resources.

r all ratepayers. The proposed level of investment in demand-side resources includes a comprehensive suite of DSM activities, and it supports continued broad services to a wide array of Nova Scotians. The investment level proposed by ENS f...

AI summary The document compares ENS's proposed 2016-2018 DSM investment levels with Nova Scotia Power's 2014 IRP plan, noting a $60M reduction. ENS's approach aims for lower short-term costs and higher long-term revenue, offering ratepayers greater net present value despite potential short-term cost challenges.

2.5.6 Summary of Non-energy Benefits Issues Increasingly, non-energy benefits – especially those that accrue to participants – are viewed as significant benefit streams that the current demand-side resource benefit-cost analysis effectivel...

AI summary Non-energy benefits, particularly those to participants, are overlooked in the current demand-side resource benefit-cost analysis. This neglect is critical as the analysis should reflect total benefits and costs to both participants and non-participants, justifying affordable investments with net financial benefits for ratepayers.

2.6 Affordability of Demand-side Resource Investments in Nova Scotia Utility resource planning efforts face a long-term responsibility to deliver reliable service at least cost for ratepayers. In the context of this guiding principle, the...

AI summary The text argues that under-investing in demand-side resources (DSM) in Nova Scotia could lead to higher long-term costs and reduced benefits for ratepayers. While ENS reduced short-term DSM investments compared to Nova Scotia Power's Preferred Resource Plan, the analysis suggests that long-term benefits are still significant. Alternative rate mitigation strategies, like rate smoothing, are recommended over reducing DSM investments.

may contain a dramatically different number of individual "programs" – is a function of semantic, organizational, or marketing preferences; not the reflection of any rational economic decision-making. • Second, since programs may involve d...

AI summary The text argues that program net benefits depend on design choices (e.g., marketing, incentives) rather than program categories. Efficient programs can vary widely in cost, output, and lifetime benefits. Focusing solely on theoretical costs may lead to suboptimal strategies. Maximizing net benefits may conflict with long-term market transformation, risk minimization, and social equity goals.

INTRODUCTION TO DSM SCREENING

AI summary An introduction to Demand Side Management (DSM) screening in Nova Scotia, involving key organizations like Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), with references to regulatory frameworks and energy efficiency programs.

Utility NEBs Other than avoided energy and capacity costs, DSM is often considered a lower risk option than many of its supply-side alternatives. This lower risk is primarily related to four aspects of the DSM profile: - 1. Hedge against f...

AI summary Demand Side Management (DSM) is presented as a lower-risk alternative to supply-side energy options due to its fuel price hedging, reliability, and planning flexibility. DSM mitigates fuel price volatility, avoids construction risks, and offers load-matching reliability. Regions like the U.S. Northwest attribute risk benefits to DSM in cost-effectiveness analyses.

RECENT CHANGES TO STANDARD PRACTICES

AI summary The document outlines recent updates to standard practices in Nova Scotia's regulatory proceedings, involving entities like NSPI, ENS, and UARB. Key topics include energy efficiency programs, demand-side management, and regulatory frameworks. No specific arguments or cross-references are detailed in the provided text.

OPTIONS FOR NOVA SCOTIA

AI summary Nova Scotia's regulatory proceeding discusses energy options involving Demand Side Management (DSM), Harmonized Sales Tax (HST), and Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). Key entities include Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB), with KPMG involved in analysis. The proceeding evaluates programs, legislation, and utility regulations.

PRIMARY RECOMMENDATION Our review of the issues and options for Nova Scotia concludes with the need to change the current cost-effectiveness framework, to ensure internal consistency and best practices. In the absence of significant change...

AI summary The analysis recommends shifting from the Total Resource Cost (TRC) to the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test for evaluating Demand Side Management (DSM) in Nova Scotia. This change is advocated for its simplicity, accuracy, relevance to ratepayer interests, and alignment with the 2014 Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring Act and Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s Integrated Resource Plan (IRP).

NOTES ON APPLICATION Beyond the choice of tests, the way in which they are applied is also important. Indeed, screening tests can be applied in a number of ways: as information to be balanced with other considerations; as a hard threshold...

AI summary The document discusses the application of cost-effectiveness screening tests for Demand Side Management (DSM) within Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NSPI) Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). It argues against applying thresholds at the 'program' level, advocating instead for sector-level screening to avoid artificial delineations and ensure equity. Portfolio-level screening risks cross-subsidization between sectors, while sector-level screening allows flexibility for Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) to optimize its portfolio.

CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS There are several options available to Nova Scotia to improve the value provided by cost-effectiveness screening of DSM initiatives. Some aim at correcting the problems inherent in the TRC; others propose shif...

AI summary The document evaluates cost-effectiveness screening methods for DSM initiatives in Nova Scotia, critiquing the Total Resource Cost (TRC) approach and advocating for the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) framework. It highlights PAC's alignment with Nova Scotia's Electricity Efficiency and Conservation plan, its transparency, and stakeholder familiarity. Concerns with TRC include methodological challenges, misalignment with the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), and inadequate benefit accounting.

Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities

AI summary The document outlines a supply agreement focused on electricity efficiency and conservation activities in Nova Scotia. It references regulatory proceedings involving Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) and Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), with potential implications for demand-side management (DSM) programs and utility regulatory oversight.

5.0 ALTERNATIVE DSM PLAN

AI summary The section outlines an alternative Demand Side Management (DSM) plan, referencing regulatory entities and prior planning documents. Key entities include the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) and ICF International, with acronyms like IRP and DSM central to the discussion.

5.1 NS Power's Alternative DSM Plan E1 did not develop or model any DSM investment scenarios lower than that contained in the proposed E1 DSM Plan. NS Power had requested E1 develop different plan scenarios, including one within an annual...

AI summary NS Power requested E1 (NSPI) to model lower DSM investment scenarios but was declined. E1's analysis lacks quantitative evaluation of lower expenditure options, limiting informed decision-making. NS Power proposes an alternative DSM plan aligned with Canadian benchmarks, emphasizing affordability and cost-effectiveness.

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT

AI summary The document heading 'SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT' is accompanied by a list of acronyms and their expansions relevant to Nova Scotia's energy regulatory proceedings, including organizations, programs, and legislative terms. No substantive content or arguments are present in the provided text.

Summary of Insights - The ENSC portfolio ranks highest on the list of jurisdictions reviewed for DSM spend per capita and per customer. - ENSC has the highest first year cost per kWh of energy savings of the jurisdictions reviewed. - Withi...

AI summary ENSC leads Canada in DSM energy savings and per capita spend but has high first-year costs per kWh. Nova Scotia plans the highest electrical DSM investment relative to energy sales. Despite industrial sector's cost-effectiveness, ENSC lacks targeted programs. ENSC's diverse DSM portfolio includes costly elements, and performance variances may impact system planning.

3 Approach Publically available information was used in the collection of the desired data. Researchers primarily drew from the regions': - DSM Plan, - Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), - Resource Option Report, - Revenue Rate Application, -...

AI summary Publicly available data sources, including DSM plans, IRPs, and utility reports, were used to collect information. Appendix B lists all referenced documents, with meta-studies and other reports also consulted.

Appendix B References 2011 Efficiency Maine Annual Report, http://www.efficiencymaine.com/docs/2011AnnualͲReport.pdf, Accessed January 29, 2015 2012Ͳ2013 Efficiency New Brunswick Annual Report, http://0101.nccdn.net/1_5/250/0f8/0fb/2012Ͳ13...

AI summary Appendix B lists references to annual reports, studies, and applications related to energy efficiency and resource planning in Nova Scotia and other provinces. Documents include Efficiency Maine and New Brunswick reports, BC Hydro resource options, and EECA supply agreements, highlighting regulatory and programmatic efforts in energy conservation and integrated resource planning.

Schedule B

AI summary Schedule B from the Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding document lists acronyms and their expansions relevant to energy efficiency, utility regulation, and resource planning. It includes organizations, programs, and regulatory frameworks involved in Nova Scotia's electricity sector.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 annual revenue requirements for the specific capacity additions in the No DSM Plan; the 2 avoided capacity costs ($K) would have to be decreased due to the reduction in the 3 assumed capacity additions. The 2014 IRP Assu...

AI summary The text discusses annual revenue requirements for capacity additions without Demand Side Management (DSM), noting reduced avoided capacity costs. It references the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) assumptions, which included discrete supply-side options like combustion turbines and combined cycle units, but lacked granularity to select precise minimum capacities annually.

2 Annual Partial Revenue Requirements - With FGD No DSM Plan ($K) CRP01-01-FGD-R01 Half-Low DSM ($K) Low DSM w Low DSM PA ($K) CRP2-17 FGD Base DSM ($K) CRP Mid DSM/FGD (Synapse Model) ($K) 2025 965,077 925,959 856,963 843,928 848,436 2026...

AI summary The table presents annual partial revenue requirements for Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) under various demand-side management (DSM) scenarios from 2025 to 2039, showing decreasing costs with increased DSM participation. The data is part of a regulatory proceeding involving the Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB) and the Consumer Advocate (CA).

3.5.4 Relationship of the Proposed 201 6-18 DSM Plan to the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan [94] During a 10-month period in 2014, NSPI developed a new IRP in collaboration with Board Staff and consultants, and in consultation with intereste...

AI summary NSPI's 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) emphasized demand-side management (DSM) to achieve cost-effective energy savings. The proposed 2016-18 DSM Plan aligns with the IRP's 'mid-DSM' scenario, which projects higher savings (519 GWh over 3 years) compared to prior DSM plans (397 GWh). The IRP process aims to balance supply-side and demand-side resources for long-term ratepayer savings.

APPENDIX D

AI summary The document text provided only contains the heading 'APPENDIX D' with no substantive content. No arguments, claims, or references are present in the text.

isition of all available energy efficiency and demand reduction resources that are cost effective or less expensive than supply…". 17 These plans must address a large number of requirements:

AI summary The Public Utilities Act (PUA) emphasizes affordability by prioritizing cost-effective energy efficiency and demand reduction resources over supply options. Integrated resource plans (IRPs) must address multiple requirements, including demand-side management (DSM) strategies.

ectives in order to maintain affordability and stability in power rates as we continue to pursue other public interest objectives relating to a greener, more diversified and secure electricity system. 27 Transcript, June 18, 2015, pp. 792-...

AI summary The document discusses balancing the affordability and stability of power rates with public interest objectives like a greener electricity system, emphasizing the role of Demand Side Management (DSM) within Nova Scotia Power Incorporated's (NSPI) Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) under the Public Utilities Act (PUA).

Short on Options 24. The IRP was an important starting point in the development of the E1 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. 36 The Province agrees that this is an important consideration, but one must be mindful of 33 NSPI has noted that energy...

AI summary The Province critiques E1's DSM plan for relying too heavily on the IRP without adequately addressing affordability and long-term capacity needs. E1's plan avoids significant generation capacity additions until 2032 but may not align with the IRP's broader goals. The Province argues E1 could have provided alternative scenarios for affordability discussions, while E1 cites resource constraints.

The Inherent Flexibility of DSM 29. The adjustability of DSM was noted by several witnesses in the proceeding, including Mr. Sampson who commented: MR. SAMPSON: I'd say for a resource like DSM, which has flexibility where there are numerou...

AI summary The document highlights DSM's flexibility compared to traditional resources, citing witnesses like Mr. Sampson and Philippe Dunsky. E1's track record of meeting targets under budget is noted, with arguments that adjusting DSM budgets may not compromise savings. Affordability and capacity requirements are emphasized as key considerations.

2016-2018 DSM Plan NS Power Closing Submission Appendix A Page 2 of 3 Memo to Nova Scotia Power July 6, 2015 Page 2 in this proceeding. Further, it is not clear that the process as described existed previously as a formal documented and ad...

AI summary E1 challenges the clarity and prior documentation of NSP's process for determining incentives under the 2016-2018 DSM Plan. The response to IR-12(g)(iv) highlights concerns about the lack of formalized procedures and references for incentive levels, emphasizing gaps in transparency and consistency.

19 Establishment of a Standardized filing for future applications to approve DSM

AI summary The proposal aims to establish a standardized filing process for future Demand Side Management (DSM) applications, ensuring consistency and efficiency in approvals under the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board. This aligns with Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) requirements, streamlining regulatory procedures for DSM initiatives.

15 OUTSTANDING ISSUES OF DSM SUPPLY AGREEMENT 16

AI summary The document outlines outstanding issues related to the Demand Side Management (DSM) supply agreement, potentially involving the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). Key topics include demand-side management and supply agreements, with no specific claims or cross-references provided.

e legislation, EfficiencyOne 25 proceeded to develop what it considered to be the appropriate DSM Plan for the contract period 26 2016-2018. In doing so, it relied upon a number of factors, including: 27 - 28 (1) The franchise holder's his...

AI summary EfficiencyOne developed a DSM Plan for 2016-2018, considering factors like NS Power's market knowledge, the 2014 IRP, affordability, NS Power feedback, and DSM system viability. Legal references include the Public Utilities Act and Exhibit 33.

htened 4 attention to the consideration of affordability was expressly considered in EfficiencyOne's Plan 5 development and was specifically noted by Ms. Vincent during the NS Power cross-examination: When we looked at the concept of affor...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's Plan balanced long-term benefits of higher DSM (per IRP) against short-term rate impacts, repurposed 2014 DSM funds for FAM repayment, and emphasized stable DSM investment to ensure rate stability, as explained by Ms. Vincent during NSP cross-examination.

(a) Proposed Target Energy and Demand Savings Are Not Needed - 10. There is no dispute that, from the perspective of NSPI's system, E1's targeted energy and demand savings are not needed during the contract period. As shown in figure 4.1 (...

AI summary NSPI argues that E1's proposed energy and demand savings targets are unnecessary during the contract period, as existing DSM measures can avoid additional generation capacity until 2032. E1 did not dispute this for 2016–2018, and both low and base DSM scenarios require similar capacity additions until 2032.

mpson during cross-examination of the NSPI panel, Plexos models the transmission system and transmission constraints, giving the ability to model details of the generating units. That modeling showed: 9 Transcript, June 18, 2015, pp. 857-8...

AI summary Higher levels of DSM may lead to increased curtailment and underutilization of the Maritime Link, according to Plexos modeling cited in the IRP. The hearing focused on DSM's NPV but overlooked operational challenges of lower loads. The IRP highlights operational benefits of lower DSM levels, suggesting they should be weighed alongside financial metrics.

from 22 percent to 35 percent (average quarterly results)." In fact, in recognition of the increased awareness of E1, E1 plans that this aspect of its advertising budget will be decreased in 2015. 15 - 23. In terms of the other potential i...

AI summary The text argues that scaling back DSM funding won't cause steep rate increases, citing the IRP's findings. E1 plans to reduce advertising spending, while Mr. Drazen emphasizes Nova Scotia's 'efficiency culture' and past cost management strategies. The IRP also shows no system need for higher DSM levels.

- 44. With respect to the Instant Saving Pricing Research (Attachment 6 to Undertaking U-4), it finds that the rebate offered by EfficiencyNS at the time for an Energy Star light bulb brought the cost within a consumer's acceptable price r...

AI summary The document criticizes E1's proposed 100% rebate incentives for energy efficiency measures, arguing they are excessive despite retail prices already being within acceptable ranges. The Industrial Group expresses concerns that E1's service framework disincentivizes reducing incentives, as performance targets prioritize measurable outcomes over enabling strategies like education. E1's inability to count non-incentive-based strategies toward targets is highlighted as a flaw.

ered to create a plan with a step change, it would result in a three to six month delay. However, it is notable that even now, E1 has not presented a final formed implementation plan. As stated by E1, As with prior DSM and DSM Resource Pla...

AI summary E1 has not provided a final implementation plan for its DSM Resource Plan, leading to uncertainty about the delay's reasons. The CA argues that a three to six month delay in a three-year contract is reasonable to avoid unnecessary programs beyond system requirements.

; correct? Ms. Vincent: Unanticipated, because when that forecast was built there was no history of Efficiency Nova Scotia's administration of DSM in order to inform that forecast.[41](#page-17-0) - 69. Mr. Faulkner's assurance that E1 wil...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) faces criticism for unanticipated DSM program forecasts and budget overruns, with the Industrial Group arguing that E1's approach risks rate instability. E1 prioritizes demand reduction across all rate classes, but stakeholders emphasize the need for prudent cost management and affordability. Regulatory obligations to customers are highlighted as a key concern.

SUMMARY The Ecology Action Centre wishes to: - (1) express support for the stakeholder settlement agreement presented to the Board; - (2) articulate that the proposed settlement agreement represents a significant concession in the interest...

AI summary The Ecology Action Centre supports a stakeholder settlement agreement but highlights its deviation from the Integrated Resource Plan's activity levels, emphasizing short-term affordability concessions. They advocate linking avoided costs to program benefits, reaffirming mid-course adjustments, proposing a revised discount rate for DSM programming, and requesting cost-recovery.

THE LIMIT OF ACCEPTABLE COMPROMISE The initial proposed investment levels offered by each of the parties to the Supply Agreement are too low to maximize benefits of DSM to the Province. Even E1's starting proposal would mean a huge diverge...

AI summary The initial investment levels in the Supply Agreement are deemed insufficient for maximizing DSM benefits. EAC supports a Settlement Agreement as a minimum investment to balance affordability and long-term savings, though it diverges from IRP guidance. Nova Scotia Power's alternate plan is criticized for disproportionately cutting efficiency programs, harming underserved communities.

a high TRC level and a high investment and then compared to another measure where the TRC is lower, but EOne's proposed investment is lower. 38 Exhibit E-28(c), EfficiencyOne Response to SBA IR-34, Attachment 1, Filed Confidentially; Exhib...

AI summary The text discusses a regulatory debate over incentive levels for Demand Side Management (DSM) in Nova Scotia. EfficiencyOne (E1) defends its methodology, asserting it uses consistent evidence as past applications, while NS Power and Industrial Group criticize it as opaque, likening it to 'magic.' The Department of Energy mandates cost-effective measures for NS Power.

3.5.1 Program Development [56] El's 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, as modified by the Quantum Agreement, recommends DSM investments for the three year period of: - (1) $36.9 million in 2016, - (2) $37.8 million in 2017, - (3) $38.8 million i...

AI summary El's 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, modified by the Quantum Agreement, allocates $113.5 million over three years. El argues that this plan is 38% less than NSPI's Mid-DSM plan and aligns with past expenditures, including the $53 million from 2014 repurposed for 2015 fuel expenses by the Board.

3.5.3 Affordability - [76] Having determined the parameters of a preferred plan, the Board is specifically directed by the 2014 amendments to the PUA to address the issue of affordability. The most relevant sections are Section 79L(8) and...

AI summary The Board is directed by 2014 PUA amendments to assess affordability in DSM programs under Section 79L(9). Affordability, previously considered in rate shock discussions and Annual Capital Expenditure Plans, now requires explicit evaluation. The Industrial Group highlights affordability's importance in its posthearing submission, while the Board must determine if Section 79L(9) alters its assessment of DSM expenditures.

update in 2009. So I believe we filed a quote from the Terms of Reference for the 2009 IRP and it lists basically what we're trying to evaluate in doing the IRP. Bullet number three says: Develop and evaluate alternative plans in order to...

AI summary The 2016-18 DSM Plan aligns with the 2014 IRP's objective to achieve cost savings and emissions reductions. DSM's primary purpose is to support the IRP's goals, including saving customers money and reducing carbon emissions. Past programs like '08-'09 met their targets, demonstrating the effectiveness of DSM initiatives.

aving considered the history of underspending on DSM programming, the history of overachieving savings and demand targets, and as an inducement to bring greater rigor to the calculation of incentives. [142] The Board considers that the tar...

AI summary The Board approves the DSM Plan, finding it achievable within approved spending, but rejects the Quantum Agreement. It emphasizes long-term cost considerations over short-term affordability, approves aspects of the Quantum Agreement, and endorses the Consensus Agreement with referrals to the DSM Advisory Group. The TRC cost-effectiveness screening remains in place.

4.3 Other Enabling Strategies

AI summary Section 4.3 discusses 'Other Enabling Strategies' in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, referencing various programs, regulatory bodies, and acronyms related to energy management and resource planning.