E-1EfficiencyOne Application - Revised Application see Exhibit E-43
4 passages
4.4 Performance Requirements Efficiency Nova Scotia retained Dunsky Energy Consulting to provide advice on a set of performance requirements that ENS should propose for the UARB's consideration in this Application. Dunsky was asked to cond...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) engaged Dunsky Energy Consulting to advise on performance requirements for Demand Side Management (DSM) programs, with a focus on metrics and targets for the Nova Scotia Utility and Ratepayer Board (UARB). Dunsky's report, attached as Appendix G, includes a jurisdictional scan showing over 80% of North American regions use energy savings and peak demand savings as primary performance metrics. Definitions for performance-related terms are provided.
Energy & Demand • Energy savings • Annual incremental • Annual cumulative • Lifetime • Peak demand savings • Annual incremental • Annual cumulative • Lifetime Costs & Benefits • Total Resource Benefits • Net Benefits • Levelized cost • Tot...
AI summary The text outlines metrics for evaluating energy efficiency programs, including energy and peak demand savings (annual incremental, cumulative, and lifetime), cost-benefit analysis (Total Resource Benefits, Net Benefits), market transformation indicators, and societal impacts (jobs, equity, GHG reductions). It explains how savings are calculated over time and emphasizes long-term vision and distributional equity.
Highlights : - Nine of the ten jurisdictions have an energy savings metric and six of them also have a peak demand savings metric. Massachusetts is the only region that has not incorporated an energy savings performance target indicator pe...
AI summary The analysis compares energy efficiency performance metrics across jurisdictions, noting that most use energy and peak demand savings, while others incorporate cost, benefits, or local economic indicators. Massachusetts uses TRB instead of energy savings targets. Vermont, DC, and Oregon have unique approaches, with Oregon avoiding financial incentives. The 29 regions are categorized by complexity of performance evaluation, with 83% using simple metrics.
Energy & Capacity - Energy savings: California and Wisconsin are the only two regions that have a formal lifecycle (lifetime) energy saving target. 4 All other regions track cumulative annual savings (over the Plan's duration). However, li...
AI summary The text compares energy saving methodologies across regions, noting California and Wisconsin as the only areas with formal lifecycle energy targets. Other regions track annual savings, though lifetime savings influence key metrics like Total Resource Benefits and Net Resource Benefits. Six regions have peak demand indicators, but only California measures lifetime savings, which impact performance metrics.