HomeNon Energy ImpactsM06733Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Non Energy Impacts" in M06733

Matter: E-ENS-R-15 - EfficiencyOne Application for approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between Efficiency One and Nova Scotia Power Inc.- NSPI - 2016-2019 DSM Plan IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION for Approval of a Supply Agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, the establishment of a final agreement between the parties, and approval of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan
3 passages 1 document

Non Energy Impacts across all matters →

E-1EfficiencyOne Application - Revised Application see Exhibit E-43 3 passages
(3) Accounting Standards p. pp. 242-244
(3) Accounting Standards EfficiencyOne prepares its financial statements in accordance with Canadian Accounting Standards for NPO' s. Management must ensure that the establishment of the reserves as presented meets these requirements. We h...

AI summary EfficiencyOne is preparing its financial statements according to Canadian accounting standards for non-profit organizations. A reserve fund is being established to cover potential severance costs, loss of funding, and external factors that may impact program offerings. The reserve balance of $9,003,018 for 2024 is deemed plausible, but it is recommended that the reserve components be reviewed annually and approved by the Board of Directors.

PARTICIPANT NON-ENERGY BENEFITS (NEBS) p. p. 263
Again, while these studies often find that participants value non-energy benefits at least as much or more than they value the direct energy savings themselves, the standard TRC values them at zero. c) Market Prices: Partly as a result of...

AI summary The text discusses how non-energy benefits (NEBs) are increasingly valued in markets, yet the Total Resource Cost (TRC) methodology does not account for them. It highlights market price premiums for energy-efficient homes in Australia, the Netherlands, and the U.S. northwest, indicating that real estate markets value energy efficiency more than the TRC recognizes.

Figure 9: Resource Value Framework - NS Qualitative Assessment p. pp. 263-290
Figure 9: Resource Value Framework - NS Qualitative Assessment Program Name: Electric DSM Date: December 2014 1. Key Assumptions, Parameters and S ummary of Resu its Analysis Level ✓ Program Alialysis Level □ Portfolio Measure Life n/a Dis...

AI summary Figure 9 presents a qualitative assessment of the Resource Value Framework for the Electric DSM program in Nova Scotia as of December 2014. It outlines key assumptions, monetized program administrator costs and benefits, participant costs and benefits, public costs and benefits, and non-monetized public benefits.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →