E-1EfficiencyOne Application - Revised Application see Exhibit E-43
6 passages
examine the details and ramifications of such a change, and would like to ensure stakeholders are engaged in a discussion on the issue before considering whether to bring forward this proposed change. 3. A transparent reporting template, a...
AI summary ENS proposes a transparent reporting template based on NESP's framework to simplify cost-effectiveness testing. They argue shifting to the PAC test would reduce input complexities, thereby minimizing the need for the template.
RECOMMENDATIONS - 1. Nova Scotia adopts the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) as the primary test for purposes of screening DSM cost-effectiveness; - 2. The PAC test be applied for information purposes at the program and portfolio levels, a...
AI summary The recommendations focus on adopting the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) as the primary test for DSM cost-effectiveness, applying it at different levels, re-examining discount rates for consistency, and developing a transparent reporting template based on NESP's framework.
ration as a type of DSM, and expanding on the nature of externalities that should be included in the Societal Cost Test (California Public Utilities Commission and California Energy Commission, 2001). In addition to the three perspective p...
AI summary The text discusses the Societal Cost Test (SCT) and Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test within cost-effectiveness frameworks. The SCT includes broader societal benefits, particularly environmental factors, while the PAC test compares utility savings from DSM to supply costs. The Standard Practice Manual outlines these tests as guidance for judgment, not strict criteria.
REGULATORY DRIVERS While the current effort at DSM in Nova Scotia is relatively new, the province's consideration of DSM dates back over fifteen years. Indeed, in the mid-1990s, in the context of an Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) proce...
AI summary Nova Scotia's DSM evolution spans 15+ years, with UARB using TRC thresholds (0.8 in 1990s, 1.0 in 2006) for DSM evaluation. The 2014 IRP prioritized cumulative revenue requirements over customer costs, while the 2014 Act linked energy efficiency to NSPI cost reduction via PAC. Synapse's analysis excluded customer costs in revenue assessments.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NOVA SCOTIA Nova Scotia has been using the TRC, which attempts to reflect the sum of participant and non-participant perspectives, to screen DSM programs. The Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Ac...
AI summary Nova Scotia uses TRC to evaluate DSM programs, but the TRC may not reflect customer preferences, leading to inefficient spending. The 2014 Act structures DSM procurement as utility-led competition with supply. Only the PAC test considers utility least-cost perspectives. Customer preferences, like valuing solar hot water over heat pumps, could be overlooked by TRC.
RECOMMENDATIONS - 1. Nova Scotia adopts the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) as the primary test for purposes of screening DSM cost-effectiveness; - 2. The PAC test be applied for information purposes at the program and portfolio levels, a...
AI summary The recommendations focus on adopting the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) as the primary test for DSM cost-effectiveness, applying it at different levels, re-examining discount rates for consistency, and developing a transparent reporting template based on NESP's framework.