Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Public Utilities Act Nova Scotia" in M06733

Matter: E-ENS-R-15 - EfficiencyOne Application for approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between Efficiency One and Nova Scotia Power Inc.- NSPI - 2016-2019 DSM Plan IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION for Approval of a Supply Agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, the establishment of a final agreement between the parties, and approval of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan
127 passages 33 documents

Public Utilities Act Nova Scotia across all matters →

E-1EfficiencyOne Application - Revised Application see Exhibit E-43 19 passages
NOV A SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD p. p. 2
NOV A SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 30 as amended -and- IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by EfficiencyOne for Approval of an electricity efficiency and conservation and Supply...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board is considering an application by EfficiencyOne for approval of an electricity efficiency and conservation agreement with NSPI (Nova Scotia Power Inc.) from 2016 to 2018, under the Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 30, as amended, specifically section 791.

NOTICE OF APPLICATION p. p. 2
NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO: The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board ("UARB" or "the Board") - 1. The Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (201 4) Act, S.N.S. 2014, c. 5 effected a new regime for the delivery of electricity...

AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks a Board decision to finalize a three-year Supply Agreement with NSPI under the Public Utilities Act, following failed negotiations. The application references a prior franchise granted in 2014 under the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring Act, and cites Board Order M06247. EfficiencyOne asserts the agreement serves the public interest.

EfficiencyOne p. p. 2
EfficiencyOne IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended. - and - IN THE MATTER OF An Application pursuant to Subsection 79J(3) of the Public Utilities Act for Approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement fo...

AI summary The document concerns an application under the Public Utilities Act for approval of a 2016-2018 electricity efficiency and conservation supply agreement. The proceeding involves Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) and focuses on regulatory approval for energy efficiency programs.

Section 8 p. p. 7
This Evidence is in support of approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities (the "Supply Agreement") between EfficiencyOne and NS Power. To the extent possible, EfficiencyOne and NS Power have reach...

AI summary This evidence supports the approval of a Supply Agreement between EfficiencyOne and NS Power for electricity efficiency and conservation activities. The document also discusses the filing of a Demand Side Management Resource Plan (2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan) by EfficiencyOne as the holder of the Efficiency Nova Scotia franchise. The Public Utilities Act requires NS Power to purchase cost-effective energy efficiency activities from the franchise holder.

Preamble p. p. 8
Revisions to The Public Utilities Act , proposed through the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act , were proclaimed on May 1, 2014. Highlights of the legislation affecting this DSM Resource Plan include the foll...

AI summary This text discusses legislative changes to the Public Utilities Act through the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act, effective from May 1, 2014. Key changes include the requirement for NS Power to implement cost-effective energy efficiency and conservation activities, the establishment of an ENS franchise, and the UARB's role in approving contracts and setting performance requirements.

3.1 Summary p. p. 25
3.1 Summary The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, as presented in Appendix A, is a three-year plan in accordance with the requirements of the Public Utilities Act. The Plan proposes a three- year energy savings target and a three-year system pe...

AI summary The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan aligns with the Public Utilities Act, setting energy and peak demand savings targets. ENS will adapt programs based on research, improve customer engagement, and implement Enabling Strategies like education, research, and market transformation initiatives to drive energy efficiency in Nova Scotia.

4.1 Development of 2016-2018 DSM Program Targets and Investment p. p. 31
4.1 Development of 2016-2018 DSM Program Targets and Investment The 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan has been developed based on ENS's growing experience and history in delivering successful DSM programs and services to Nova Scotians. As part o...

AI summary ENS developed the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan using Navigant Consulting's EL-RAM model, aligning with cost-effective targets and investment levels. The Plan's 405.9 GWh energy savings and 62.5 MW demand savings aim to balance affordability with long-term energy needs, referencing NS Power's 2014 IRP and updated assumptions. ENS emphasizes reduced rate pressures and capacity additions compared to prior scenarios.

4.1.1 Results of NS Power's 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Process p. pp. 31-33
4.1.1 Results of NS Power's 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Process The Preferred Resource Plan from NS Power's 2014 IRP specified that the Candidate Resource Plan modelled by Synapse Engineering Economics included a level of DSM consi...

AI summary NS Power's 2014 IRP identified a Candidate Resource Plan (CRP) with Mid-DSM levels from ENSC's study as yielding the lowest revenue requirement. High-DSM scenarios, when end-effects were considered, provided long-term benefits with lower ongoing costs. ENS opted against Mid-DSM due to legislative and structural changes, aligning instead with government policy and the Public Utilities Act's deferral/amortization provisions.

4.4 Performance Requirements p. p. 51
percent have restricted their Performance Targets to include the metrics of energy savings and peak demand savings. Jurisdictions also sometimes include a metric associated with costs or expenditures. ENS Performance Targets: ENS agrees wi...

AI summary ENS agrees with Dunsky's recommendation to align Performance Targets with Subsection 79A(b)(v) of The Public Utilities Act , focusing on cumulative energy and peak demand savings. ENS proposes annual Performance Indicators including Total Ratepayer Benefits, Total Spending, and Customer Satisfaction, but excludes Total Spending as a Performance Target due to inherent business risks.

4.5.1 Transition Update p. p. 55
4.5.1 Transition Update The Public Utilities Act established "Efficiency Nova Scotia" as a franchise starting January 1, 2015. The franchise holder has the exclusive right to supply NS Power, which must purchase all reasonably available, c...

AI summary The Public Utilities Act established 'Efficiency Nova Scotia' as a franchise starting January 1, 2015, with EfficiencyOne as the first franchise holder. ENSC transitioned to EfficiencyOne by January 2015, transferring all assets except historical HST claims to ENSTC. EfficiencyOne operates under the franchise agreement, using the 'Efficiency Nova Scotia' brand for energy efficiency activities.

5.1 Cost-Effectiveness Testing p. pp. 62-63
of these options were given serious consideration by ENS and reviewed with the DSM Advisory Group over the last two years. The PAC test is recommended by ENS, based on the following input from Dunsky: • The PAC test is inherently balanced....

AI summary ENS recommends the PAC test for cost-effectiveness due to its balance, ratepayer value reflection, and alignment with the Public Utilities Act. Dunsky's report suggests applying PAC at program/portfolio levels for information and sector levels for decision-making, while re-examining discount rates. ENS will provide sector-level results for information purposes.

2. Contracted Deliverables p. p. 101
2. Contracted Deliverables ENS is proposing a three-year contracted deliverable of cumulative energy and peak demand savings. A three-year deliverable is consistent with previous multi-year DSM Plans, other jurisdictions and the Public Uti...

AI summary ENS proposes a three-year contracted deliverable for cumulative energy and peak demand savings, aligning with previous multi-year DSM plans, other jurisdictions, and the Public Utilities Act.

Public Utilities Act p. p. 101
Public Utilities Act Under Section 79I of the Public Utilities Act , NS Power is required to purchase reasonably available, cost-effective energy efficiency and conservation activities. NS Power is obligated to meet this requirement by ent...

AI summary Under Sections 79I and 79J of the Public Utilities Act , NS Power must enter into a three-year agreement with a franchise holder to purchase energy efficiency and conservation activities. ENS argues that the contracted deliverable should reflect three-year cumulative energy and peak demand savings.

Stakeholder Stakeholder Comment p. p. 139
Assumptions used in ENS's 2016-2018 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis Stakeholder Stakeholder Comment ENSC's Response Inclusion in the model The Industrial Group appreciates that ENSC will look into incorporating the effects of deferring and a...

AI summary The Industrial Group acknowledges ENSC's plan to incorporate the effects of deferring and amortizing DSM program costs over eight years, as required by the Public Utilities Act. ENSC is evaluating the feasibility of including both the costs and benefits of deferral and amortization in its model and will share modifications with stakeholders before filing its next analysis as part of the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan Application.

1.1 Report Purpose p. p. 190
1.1 Report Purpose This report contextualizes the proposed level of investment in demand-side resources for 2016 to 2018 in Efficiency Nova Scotia's (ENS) three-year Demand-Side Resource Plan. We consider levels of demandside resource inve...

AI summary This report evaluates the proposed investment in demand-side resources for 2016–2018 under Efficiency Nova Scotia's (ENS) three-year plan, assessing their value to Nova Scotians and compliance with the Public Utilities Act .

1.3 Legislative Charge p. pp. 191-193
1.3 Legislative Charge In the Public Utilities Act, the Nova Scotia General Assembly mandated that Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) "undertake cost-effective energy efficiency and conservation activities that are reasonably available in an ef...

AI summary The Nova Scotia General Assembly mandates Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) to undertake cost-effective energy efficiency and conservation activities under the Public Utilities Act, emphasizing their ability to reduce customer costs. The directive requires balancing benefits, costs, and rate class interests, with affordability being a key consideration for the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.

1. INTRODUCTION p. p. 212
1. INTRODUCTION In 2014, under the Public Utilities Act , the government of Nova Scotia created a new model for the delivery of energy efficiency in the province. Under this model, the Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) Franchise was created, an...

AI summary In 2014, Nova Scotia established the Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) Franchise under the Public Utilities Act, transitioning to EfficiencyOne. The UARB oversees franchise performance, while Dunsky was commissioned to recommend Target Performance Indicators (TPIs) for ENS, based on a jurisdictional scan and Nova Scotia-specific context. The report outlines background, jurisdictional analysis, and TPI recommendations.

Schedule "C": Performance Requirements Schedule "D": Confidentiality Agreement Schedule "E": Approved EECA Plan p. pp. 291-295
Schedule "C": Performance Requirements Schedule "D": Confidentiality Agreement Schedule "E": Approved EECA Plan 1 2 THIS AGREEMENT of January, 2016 made as of the day of (the "Effective Date"). , 2015 and effective as of the 1st day 3 BETW...

AI summary This document outlines an agreement between Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI) and EfficiencyOne, detailing their obligations under the Public Utilities Act to provide cost-effective Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities. It includes definitions and terms relevant to the agreement.

1 2 3 4 (s.14), intellectual property (s. 17), notification (s. 21) and general provisions (s. 26) as well as any provisions which are required to determine, or which exclu p. p. 311
1 IN WITNESS THEREOF , the Parties have duly executed this Agreement, in duplicate, as of the 2 date set forth above. 1 2 3 4 (s.14), intellectual property (s. 17), notification (s. 21) and general provisions (s. 26) as well as any provisi...

AI summary The document outlines an agreement between Efficiency One and NSPI regarding the provision of energy efficiency and conservation activities under the Supply Agreement. It references the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act and the Public Utilities Act, as well as the role of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board in overseeing the exchange of confidential information.

E-7E1 (NSPI) RIR-1 to RIR-47 2 passages
Section 725
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-27: 2 3 Reference: EfficiencyOne, Evidence - Page 34, Lines 4-5: 4 5 E1 states that “maintaining current DSM levels has the additional benefit of providing 6 DSM-related rate stability over time.” 7 8 Please r...

AI summary The response to Request IR-27 explains that maintaining current DSM levels helps avoid future rate increases by reducing the need for costly capital expenditures. It references the UARB’s 2014 decision on the DSM Cost Recovery Rider and changes to the Public Utilities Act that embedded DSM costs into the overall energy charge.

Section 726
The amendments to the Public 28 Utilities Act also resulted in payments which would have been collected from NSPI customers 29 for DSM in 2015 being deferred, with payment beginning in 2016. 30 Date Filed: March 27, 2015 E1 (NSPI) IR-27 Pa...

AI summary Amendments to the Public Utilities Act caused payments for DSM in 2015 to be deferred until 2016. The document includes a 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for EECA and responses to NSPI information requests.

E-8Evidence of Nova Scotia Power Inc. 4 passages
Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board p. p. 16
Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended. - and - IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by EfficiencyOne for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Co...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board is considering EfficiencyOne's application for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc., establishment of a final agreement, and approval of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan under the Public Utilities Act. The proceeding is referenced as M06733.

1 2.0 INTRODUCTION p. p. 16
1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2 3 As a result of recent amendments to the Public Utilities Act (Nova Scotia) ("Act"), the 4 Province of Nova Scotia has created a franchise system for the supply of cost-effective 5 energy efficiency and conservation a...

AI summary Nova Scotia amended the Public Utilities Act to create a franchise system for energy efficiency (DSM) programs. NS Power and E1 could not finalize a 3-year Supply Agreement due to disagreements over DSM quantity, cost, and E1's autonomy. NS Power supports DSM for stable prices but opposes E1's flexibility in altering plans, citing testimony from David Pickles.

History of Results p. p. 116
for the period April 1 to June 30, 2014, August 7, 2014. Efficiency Nova Scotia, Q2 Demand Side Management Report, 2014 Quarter Two Activity for the period April 1 to June 30, 2014, August 27, 2014. EfficiencyOne, Evidence of Efficiency On...

AI summary The text references Efficiency Nova Scotia's Q2 2014 Demand Side Management (DSM) report, a 2016-2018 supply agreement application, and savings verification studies for DSM programs (2010-2011). It also cites a market trends report on Nova Scotia's electricity supply and demand. Documents span 2011-2015, focusing on energy efficiency programs and regulatory proceedings.

Appendix B References p. p. 120
e Management Report, 2014 Quarter Two Activity for the period April 1 to June 30, 2014, August 27, 2014.Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, Evidence of ENSC As DSM Administrator – Revised July 3, 2014 EfficiencyOne, Evidence of Efficiency...

AI summary The document lists references and evidence submissions related to energy efficiency programs, regulatory proceedings, and utility reports in Nova Scotia. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, Fortis Inc., Hydro One, and EfficiencyOne. Topics involve demand-side management (DSM), rate plans, and savings verification studies. Legal matters include applications under the Public Utilities Act and regulatory reviews.

E-10NSPI (AEC) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-5 1 passage
NON-CONFIDENTIAL
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-4: 2 3 With reference to Appendix B, residential lighting and other elements 4 5 Does NS Power acknowledge that low income renters will experience hardship replacing 6 their lights with efficient bulbs due to...

AI summary The document addresses a request (IR-4) asking if NS Power acknowledges that low-income renters face hardship replacing bulbs with efficient ones due to costs and whether a direct install program will continue. NS Power responds by affirming support for low-income initiatives, collaboration with stakeholders like AEC, and alignment with affordability goals under the Public Utilities Act.

E-11NSPI (CA) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-41 - Redacted 1 passage
Request IR-1: p. p. 11
Request IR-1: 2 1 3 Reference: 2016-2018 DSM Plan NS Power Evidence Appendix B 4 - 5 NSPI has proposed a DSM spending of approximately $22 per year for the years 2016- - 6 2018. How was an annual DSM budget of $22 million determined to be...

AI summary NS Power justifies a $22 million annual DSM budget for 2016-2018 by aligning with the 2014 IRP and Public Utilities Act, using ELRAM scenarios, and citing consistency with Canadian jurisdictions' per-customer spending.

E-13NSPI (E1) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-50 - Redacted 2 passages
2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to EfficiencyOne Information Requests p. p. 17
2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to EfficiencyOne Information Requests 1 Request IR-14: 2 per Subsection 79I (3e) of the Public Utilities Act, given that NS Power has 3 not sought approval to undertake the activities durin...

AI summary NSPI responds to EfficiencyOne's information requests regarding the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, addressing savings targets and NS Power's partnership with the Clean Nova Scotia Foundation. NSPI outlines differences in proposed energy savings scenarios and references the Public Utilities Act, specifically subsection 79I (3), to explain how NS Power may contribute to energy efficiency initiatives.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 67
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-43: 2 3 Reference: NS Power's Evidence, Page 22, lines 19-23 and Footnote 32. 4 5 Does NS Power intend to expense the costs of DSM in years 2016, 2017 and 2018 as they 6 occur or defer or amortize the costs ov...

AI summary The proceeding asks whether NS Power will expense or defer DSM costs from 2016 to 2018, referencing the Public Utilities Act. NS Power refers to Synapse IR-4 for its response.

E-15NSPI (Multeese) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-19 - Redacted 1 passage
2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to Multeese Information Requests p. p. 26
2016-2018 DSM Plan (NSUARB M06733) NSPI Responses to Multeese Information Requests 1 Request IR-12: 18 budgeted and actuals for each of the following for each of the years 2010 -2014: 19 20 (i) Annual system energy requirements 21 22 (ii)...

AI summary The document outlines NSPI's responses to information requests related to the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, including references to the Public Utilities Act and discussions about performance evaluation timelines and funding considerations.

E-16NSPI (NSUARB) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-15 1 passage
1 Request IR-5: p. p. 6
1 Request IR-5: 4 annual amount in a given year is not spent, then it is to be deducted from the amount owing 5 in the following years. 6 7 (a) Does NSPI anticipate that this reduced spending could restrict E1's ability to 8 achieve the 3-...

AI summary The document includes two requests (IR-5 and IR-13) related to E1's spending and its status as a regulated public utility. NSPI responds to IR-5 by stating that E1 has historically met its efficiency targets and that NSPI is not liable for E1's performance under the Public Utilities Act.

E-17NSPI (Peach) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-24 2 passages
NON-CONFIDENTIAL
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-2: 19 laws. Please refer to Peach IR-3. 1 Request IR-8: 2 3 Is it NSPI's understanding that the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring 4 (2014) Act (Act) creates a "first franchise holder" for e...

AI summary The document discusses a request and response regarding the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act and its definition of a 'first franchise holder' under the Public Utilities Act. It outlines the legal framework for granting an electricity efficiency and conservation franchise to Nova Scotia Power Incorporated.

1 Request IR-21:
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-21: 2 3 NSPI is concerned with "providing E1 with broad decision-making authority for the 4 potential shifting of budgets among programs or altering the design of the portfolio." 5 (Reference 2016-2018 DSM Pla...

AI summary NSPI is concerned about E1's proposed authority to shift budgets and alter program designs, as well as the compensation structure tied to energy savings over a three-year period. NSPI also suggests that unused funds should be deducted from future payments or refunded to customers.

60726Hearing Order 1 passage
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT -and- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by EfficiencyOne for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc., th...

AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. for electricity efficiency activities and establishment of a final agreement, along with approval of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan under the Public Utilities Act. The proceeding is before a regulatory board chaired by Peter W. Gurnham, Q.C., with members Kulvinder S. Dhillon and Roberta J. Clarke.

60881Amended Hearing Order 1 passage
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT -and- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by EfficiencyOne for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc., th...

AI summary The document outlines an application by EfficiencyOne for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. for electricity efficiency activities, along with approval of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan under the Public Utilities Act.

62745Board Decision 16 passages
R IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT p. p. 0
R IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT -and- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION for Approval of a Supply Agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, the estab...

AI summary The document outlines an application for approval of a supply agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, establishment of a final agreement, and approval of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan. Key parties include applicants, counsel, and advocates involved in the regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act.

2.0 BACKGROUND p. p. 0
changes to DSM programming by amending the PUA and repealing the ENSC Act . Electricity efficiency and conservation activities were defined: - 79A In this Section and Sections 79B to 79V. . . . - (b) "electricity efficiency and conservatio...

AI summary The document outlines changes to demand-side management (DSM) programming through amendments to the Public Utilities Act (PUA) and repeal of the ENSC Act. It defines electricity efficiency and conservation activities, including demand reduction during peak periods and cost-effective system management. The Board equates DSM with these activities, requiring franchise holders to provide them under PUA provisions.

3.1 Evaluation Report of 2014 DSM Programs (Econoler) p. p. 0
3.1 Evaluation Report of 2014 DSM Programs (Econoler) [28] As in the previous year, El engaged the services of Econoler Inc. ('Econoler") to conduct independent evaluations of the 2014 DSM programs. The Econoler team collaborated with two...

AI summary Econoler evaluated Nova Scotia's 2014 DSM programs under a rolling schedule from a 2012 Settlement Agreement, collaborating with Corporate Research and Equilibrium Engineering. The evaluation focused on validating ENSC's tracked savings and covered seven programs with 16 components, with reports filed in February 2015.

3.2 Verification Report of 2014 OSM Programs (Peach) p. p. 0
on (State and Local Energy Efficiency Action Network) Evaluation Protocol for behaviour-based programs, and is also strongly recommended in the Universal Methods Protocol for behaviour-based programs. [45] Similar to the Econoler recommend...

AI summary Dr. Peach's verification report addresses methodological flaws in OSM program evaluations, recommends using NSPI databases for comparisons, and suggests accepting vendor results with qualifications. Behavioral programs are classified as enabling strategies, not primary DSM tools. The report endorses improved evaluation practices and highlights the limited standalone value of behavioral-based programs.

3.5 Proposed 2016-18 DSM Resource Plan p. p. 0
3.5 Proposed 2016-18 DSM Resource Plan

AI summary The section outlines the proposed 2016-18 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, focusing on energy efficiency initiatives under Nova Scotia regulatory frameworks. Key entities include Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) and legislation such as the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act (EECR Act).

3.5.1 Program Development p. p. 0
tal emissions caps; - renewable energy; and, - COMFIT. The province's leadership in these areas, however, has also resulted in Nova Scotia having some of the highest electricity rates in the country. Just a few years ago, when the province...

AI summary Nova Scotia's focus on emissions reduction, renewable energy, and the COMFIT program has led to high electricity rates. While affordability is now a top priority, past policies will increase costs for years. The COMFIT program adds costly renewable generation, and the Quantum Agreement parties support DSM spending levels.

3.5.2.1 Findings p. p. 0
3.5.2.1 Findings [71] The CA summarized his view of the purpose of a DSM program: The basic purpose is to reduce the level of energy required by Nova Scotia in the future, both short and long term. DSM programs are an integral component in...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate emphasizes the importance of DSM programs in reducing energy demand and supporting Nova Scotia's energy strategy. The Board expresses concerns with NSPI's plan, noting reduced residential spending and a disconnect with the IRP, while favoring El's plan for better alignment with the PUA and long-term cost savings.

3.5.3 Affordability p. p. 0
3.5.3 Affordability - [76] Having determined the parameters of a preferred plan, the Board is specifically directed by the 2014 amendments to the PUA to address the issue of affordability. The most relevant sections are Section 79L(8) and...

AI summary The Board must assess affordability of electricity efficiency programs under PUA amendments (Sections 79L(8)-(9)), shifting from traditional lowest long-term cost criteria. Affordability has long been relevant in rate shock discussions and capital expenditure reviews, with Section 79L(9) explicitly requiring affordability evaluation. The Industrial Group emphasizes affordability in its post-hearing submission.

3.5.6 Avoided Cost Analysis p. p. 0
3.5.6 Avoided Cost Analysis [101] Synapse, in its evidence, indicated that rate impact analysis should account for all factors that impact rates either positively or negatively, which would include avoided costs that might exert downward p...

AI summary The text discusses avoided cost analysis in Nova Scotia's regulatory context, emphasizing Synapse's view on rate impact analysis, E1's recognition of DSM benefits, NSPI's interest in locational avoided costs, and the Board's encouragement of collaboration. Key considerations include environmental compliance, transmission deferral, and stakeholder coordination.

3.10 Agreed form of Supply Agreement p. p. 0
3.10 Agreed form of Supply Agreement [120] El included an Agreed Form of Supply Agreement as Appendix J of its application, effective January 2016. The Supply Agreement generally outlines the terms and conditions which each party is expect...

AI summary El submitted an Agreed Form of Supply Agreement as Appendix J, effective January 2016, outlining terms under the PUA. Schedules were left blank pending the Board's decision and Compliance Filing.

3.11 Compliance with Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act p. p. 0
3.11 Compliance with Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act [122] Section 79J of the PUA contemplates that El and NSPI will enter into an agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation. That implies to the...

AI summary The Board notes the litigious nature of the proceeding between El and NSPI over the DSM budget, emphasizing the need for good faith negotiations. Despite significant costs, a Consensus Agreement was reached post-hearing. The Board criticizes the lack of early agreement on non-budget issues and highlights the budget dispute's negative impact on negotiations, funded by ratepayers.

4.0 LETTERS OF COMMENT AND PUBLIC SPEAKERS p. p. 0
ogramming for low income renters within the Plan approved by the Board. [136] The Board notes, however, its limited role, as pointed out by Counsel for the Industrial Group in its closing submission: 32. It is not the role of the Board to...

AI summary The Board emphasizes its limited role in supporting industry or addressing job creation, stating these are provincial policy matters. It reaffirms jurisdiction over DSM plans under PUA sections 79L(8)-(9), focusing on customer interests and affordability. The Industrial Group's submission highlights that businesses outside E1's preferred suppliers can deliver efficiency programs.

5.0 SUMMARY OF BOARD FINDINGS p. p. 0
aving considered the history of underspending on DSM programming, the history of overachieving savings and demand targets, and as an inducement to bring greater rigor to the calculation of incentives. [142] The Board considers that the tar...

AI summary The Board approves the El DSM Plan within approved spending, acknowledges affordability under PUA s.79L, but warns against short-term focus. It rejects the Quantum Agreement but approves aspects like DSM Expenditure Justification Criteria. The Consensus Agreement is approved with referrals to the DSM Advisory Group, and TRC remains for cost effectiveness.

Preamble p. p. 0
M06733 IN THE MATtER OF: THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT And IN THE MATtER OF: An application by EfficiencyOneforApproval of a Supply Agreementfor Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between Efficiencyone ("El") and Nova Scotia Pow...

AI summary This document outlines a consensus agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc. for the approval of a supply agreement and the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan. The agreement was reached following the submission of evidence and responses to information requests by both parties and intervenors.

APPENDIX D p. p. 0
APPENDIX D

AI summary The document text provided only contains the heading 'APPENDIX D' with no substantive content. No arguments, claims, or references are present in the text.

Consensus Agreement p. p. 0
Consensus Agreement M06733 IN THE MATtER OF: THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT And IN THE MATtER OF: An application by EfficiencyOneforApprovat of a Supply Agreementfor Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between EfficiencyOne and No...

AI summary EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) reached a consensus agreement regarding the approval of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan and a Supply Agreement for electricity efficiency activities. The agreement was reached under the Public Utilities Act, with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board's oversight. The Terms of Consensus are attached as Appendix A, with the right to amend based on further evidence.

63307Board Order 4 passages
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT p. p. 3
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION for Approval of a Supply Agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, the estab...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) applied for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI) and a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan under the Public Utilities Act. The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board conducted hearings and issued a decision in August 2015. Intervenors included advocacy groups, industry representatives, and government agencies.

1. INTERPRETATION p. p. 3
1. INTERPRETATION - 1.1 The following terms shall be interpreted as follows in this Agreement: - (a) "Act" shall mean the Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended from time to time. - (b) "Agreement" means this agreement betw...

AI summary The 'INTERPRETATION' section defines key terms in the agreement between NSPI and EfficiencyOne. 'Act' refers to the Public Utilities Act, 'Agreement' includes the contract and attached schedules, and 'Business Day' excludes holidays in Nova Scotia.

Preamble p. p. 26
And whereas in accordance with the Supply Agreement, and the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act (Nova Scotia) and the Public Utilities Act (Nova Scotia) (together hereinafter referred to as the "Legislation"), and as may be direct...

AI summary This preamble outlines the intent of the Parties to exchange and manage Confidential Information in accordance with the Supply Agreement, the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act, and the Public Utilities Act, under the direction of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.

SCHEDULE B Consensus Agreement p. p. 73
SCHEDULE B Consensus Agreement WEPUBUC UTILITIESACT An application by EfficiencyOneforApproval ofaSupply Agreementfor Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia PowerInc., the establishment ofo...

AI summary EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) seek approval for a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan and Supply Agreement under the Public Utilities Act. The Consensus Agreement outlines terms agreed upon by both parties, with the right to amend based on further evidence. The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB) is involved in the proceeding.

61808Confidential Undertaking 1 passage
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380 as amended - and - IN THE MATTER OF: E-ENS-R-15 - EfficiencyOne Application for approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficienc...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board is considering amendments to the Public Utilities Act and EfficiencyOne's application for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. for electricity efficiency and conservation activities. Matter No. M06733 is referenced.

62375Closing Submission - Affordable Energy Coalition 1 passage
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD p. p. 7
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF : Application by EfficiencyOne for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between Effic...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board is considering EfficiencyOne's application for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc., focusing on electricity efficiency and conservation activities. The application includes establishing a final agreement and approving a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan under the Public Utilities Act.

62377Closing Submission - Small Business Advocate 1 passage
VIA EMAIL p. p. 0
VIA EMAIL Ms. Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3 rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Friis: RE: M06733 An Application by EfficiencyOne for Approval of a Supply Ag...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate (SBA) submits closing arguments regarding EfficiencyOne's application for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. under the Public Utilities Act. The SBA is a signatory to two consensus agreements (Monetary and Non-Monetary) addressing issues raised by their consultant, John Athas.

62378Closing Statement - Nova Scotia Department of Energy 8 passages
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD p. p. 2
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act - and - IN THE MATTER OF: EfficiencyOne's Application pursuant to Subsection 79J(3) of the Public Utilities Act for Approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board is considering EfficiencyOne's application under the Public Utilities Act for approval of a 2016-2018 supply agreement focused on electricity efficiency and conservation activities. The proceeding involves regulatory review of the proposed agreement under Subsection 79J(3) of the Act.

Preamble p. p. 2
- 1. Please accept these closing submissions on behalf of the Department of Energy 1 , in relation to an application to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 2 by EfficiencyOne 3 for the approval of a Supply Agreement for electricity ef...

AI summary The Department of Energy submits closing arguments on behalf of EfficiencyOne's application to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board for a Supply Agreement with Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for electricity efficiency and conservation activities under the Public Utilities Act. The proceeding focuses on determining the affordability of demand-side management (DSM) in current rates as a long-term investment for Nova Scotia's electricity system.

The Public Utilities Act Focus on Affordability p. pp. 2-3
The Public Utilities Act Focus on Affordability - 4. Amendments to the PUA in 2014 added new provisions relating to Electricity Efficiency and Conservation. These amendments place an explicit obligation on NSPI to "undertake cost-effective...

AI summary The 2014 amendments to the Public Utilities Act (PUA) require NSPI to implement cost-effective electricity efficiency programs via a franchise agreement. The Board must approve such agreements, ensuring they benefit customers and consider affordability. E1 holds the first efficiency franchise under the PUA, with obligations similar to public utilities.

The Affordability of DSM in the Context of other Rate Pressures p. p. 7
ectives in order to maintain affordability and stability in power rates as we continue to pursue other public interest objectives relating to a greener, more diversified and secure electricity system. 27 Transcript, June 18, 2015, pp. 792-...

AI summary The document discusses balancing the affordability and stability of power rates with public interest objectives like a greener electricity system, emphasizing the role of Demand Side Management (DSM) within Nova Scotia Power Incorporated's (NSPI) Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) under the Public Utilities Act (PUA).

The Inherent Flexibility of DSM p. pp. 9-12
The Inherent Flexibility of DSM 29. The adjustability of DSM was noted by several witnesses in the proceeding, including Mr. Sampson who commented: MR. SAMPSON: I'd say for a resource like DSM, which has flexibility where there are numerou...

AI summary The document highlights DSM's flexibility compared to traditional resources, citing witnesses like Mr. Sampson and Philippe Dunsky. E1's track record of meeting targets under budget is noted, with arguments that adjusting DSM budgets may not compromise savings. Affordability and capacity requirements are emphasized as key considerations.

Deferral and Amortization p. pp. 12-16
Deferral and Amortization - 41. The Province submits that a decision on how DSM costs should be recovered (i.e. whether they are deferred or expensed) should generally be made at the same time as the DSM budget is set. The Province submits...

AI summary The Province argues that decisions on deferring or expensing DSM costs should align with DSM budget approvals, balancing affordability and iterative processes. It acknowledges discussions with the Consensus Settlement Agreement parties on cost allocation and suggests deferring DSM expenses due to both short-term and long-term benefits. The Province clarifies that s.79M(6) may apply to NSPI, not E1, and proposes that E1's financing outside NSPI's rate base should be discussed within the Consensus Settlement Agreement framework.

Consensus Settlement Agreement and Terms of Consensus Agreement p. pp. 16-17
Consensus Settlement Agreement and Terms of Consensus Agreement 47. The Province supports some aspects of the terms of Consensus Agreement but does not agree with the DSM investment level and performance targets. The Province notes that in...

AI summary The Province supports aspects of the Consensus Agreement but disagrees with DSM investment levels and performance targets. Other topics for discussion include standardized filing, rate impact analysis, DSM expenditure criteria, and cost-effectiveness testing. The Province supports mid-course adjustments, flexibility for E1, and the Principles of Equity and Performance Targets.

Conclusions p. pp. 17-18
Conclusions - 51. The amendments to the PUA in 2014 bring a new focus to the affordability of DSM in Nova Scotia. In the context of current and anticipated rate pressures, and in light of the fact that DSM is not required to address near t...

AI summary The Province argues that E1's DSM plan is overly expensive and unnecessary given current rate pressures and lack of near-term capacity needs. It requests a more modest plan, affordability-focused alternatives, and NSPI to address rate pressures. The Province also emphasizes assessing DSM effectiveness and proper handling of Supply Agreement costs.

62379Closing Submission - Nova Scotia Power Inc. 6 passages
Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board p. p. 51
Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended. -and- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by EfficiencyOne for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Cons...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board considers EfficiencyOne's application for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. and a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan under the Public Utilities Act. The proceeding involves establishing a final agreement between the parties.

1 Nevertheless, these policies have and continue to come at a cost to ratepayers and are part p. p. 51
24 In the face of these challenges to affordability, NS Power has, amongst other things, 25 significantly reduced its workforce and its capital expenditure program. These efforts 26 have been very challenging for NS Power and for those Nov...

AI summary NS Power has reduced its workforce and capital expenditure to address affordability challenges, but this has come at a cost to ratepayers, contributing to high electricity rates in Nova Scotia. The discussion highlights the unique energy efficiency model in Nova Scotia with EOne as a utility under the Public Utilities Act and the use of benchmarking to assess spending levels.

DATE FILED: July 8, 2015 Page 8 of 50 p. p. 51
DATE FILED: July 8, 2015 Page 8 of 50 1 3.0 LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS 2 3 Unlike the Company's environmental and renewable generation requirements, the 4 expenditure level of DSM has not been legislatively mandated. There is nothing in the...

AI summary The document discusses the legislative requirements for Demand Side Management (DSM) in Nova Scotia, noting that DSM expenditure levels are not mandated by law. It outlines the responsibilities of EfficiencyOne (E1) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) under the Public Utilities Act, emphasizing the need for DSM programs to be affordable and in the best interests of customers.

5.0 RATE PRESSURE p. p. 51
5.0 RATE PRESSURE Electricity rates are a critical consideration in assessing the affordability of DSM expenditures and an issue which the Board must take into account. Indeed, as noted above, the DOE in its comments on the balancing of sh...

AI summary The DOE opposes DSM spending that increases electricity rates, while NS Power argues DSM costs are incremental and not currently in customer rates. NS Power highlights DSM's flexibility and three-year review under the Public Utilities Act. The removal of the DSM rate rider in 2015 and use of fuel charges to address FAM deferrals are also discussed.

2016-2018 DSM Plan NS Power Closing Submission Appendix A Page 2 of 3 p. p. 51
2016-2018 DSM Plan NS Power Closing Submission Appendix A Page 2 of 3 Memo to Nova Scotia Power July 6, 2015 Page 2 in this proceeding. Further, it is not clear that the process as described existed previously as a formal documented and ad...

AI summary E1 challenges the clarity and prior documentation of NSP's process for determining incentives under the 2016-2018 DSM Plan. The response to IR-12(g)(iv) highlights concerns about the lack of formalized procedures and references for incentive levels, emphasizing gaps in transparency and consistency.

Response: p. p. 51
Response: Please refer to EfficiencyOne's response to NSPI IR‐10 Attachment 1, filed electronically, for measure‐level incentives modelled in the EL‐RAM, which are provided in column BK. The modelled incentive dollars provided reflect actu...

AI summary The response critiques EfficiencyOne's (E1) use of the ELRAM model for incentive calculations, citing lack of rationale, excessive incentives compared to other jurisdictions, and failure to consider cost-effectiveness or affordability. It highlights flaws in E1's process, including reliance on customer input without quantitative criteria and benchmarking against high-cost states, leading to potentially inappropriate incentive levels.

62380Closing Submission - Efficiency One 8 passages
EfficiencyOne p. p. 0
EfficiencyOne IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380, as amended. - and - IN THE MATTER OF An Application pursuant to Subsection 79J(3) of the Public Utilities Act for Approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement f...

AI summary The document pertains to a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380, concerning an application for approval of a 2016-2018 supply agreement focused on electricity efficiency and conservation activities.

Preamble p. pp. 2-42
eement - 31 investment level, the energy savings will be realized at 62 percent of the Mid-DSM investment 1 level (89 percent of the Low-DSM level of investment). In addition to providing significant - 2 energy benefits, EfficiencyOne's DS...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's DSM Plan offers lower unit costs, avoids new capacity additions until 2032, and balances short-term and long-term affordability. It aligns with the Public Utilities Act and stakeholder endorsements. NS Power's alternative scenario is criticized for lacking this balance. The plan maintains energy efficiency industry stability and provides near-term and long-term benefits.

11 HST p. pp. 12-14
11 HST 12 - 13 Under the former DSM administration structure, following the advice of experts, Efficiency - 14 Nova Scotia Corporation ("ENSC") (as it then was) sought a ruling from the Canada Revenue - 15 Agency. Specifically, ENSC sought...

AI summary EfficiencyOne discusses the historical HST issues related to DSM programs and asserts that its new Supply Agreement with NS Power ensures HST is only collected once, avoiding double payment by customers. It also claims compliance with the Public Utilities Act for its proposed DSM Resource Plan.

1 (2) Each agreement must p. p. 14
1 (2) Each agreement must 2 3 (a) be for a term of 3 years, ending on December 31st of the third year of the 4 agreement; 5 (b) not be terminable or terminated unless the franchise holder's franchise is 6 terminated or the termination is a...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for agreements related to electricity efficiency and conservation activities, including term length, termination conditions, and payment terms. It references the Public Utilities Act and proposes the approval of a 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan with specific investment amounts for each year.

1 NS Power Alternate Scenarios p. pp. 23-25
1 NS Power Alternate Scenarios 2 3 In its evidence, NS Power has advanced four "alternate scenarios" and suggests the ones in the 4 range of $22 million per year would be "best aligned with the near and mid-term needs of Nova Scotia Power'...

AI summary NS Power proposed four alternate scenarios for electricity efficiency and conservation activities, suggesting those costing around $22 million per year are best aligned with system and customer needs. EfficiencyOne rejects this approach, emphasizing its role as franchise holder and the Board's responsibility to determine cost-effective measures under the Public Utilities Act.

1 COST-EFFECTIVENESS SCREENING p. pp. 42-45
1 COST-EFFECTIVENESS SCREENING 3 In its Application, EfficiencyOne requested approval to change the primary cost-effectiveness testing methodology from the TRC to the PAC for subsequent DSM Resource Plans.[65](#page-44-1) 4 In support of t...

AI summary EfficiencyOne requested approval to switch from the TRC to the PAC test for DSM Resource Plans, citing benefits like fairness and alignment with the Public Utilities Act. NS Power opposed the change, arguing that PAC lowers the cost-effectiveness standard, potentially leading to suboptimal choices. EfficiencyOne defends the shift as necessary to ensure unbiased screening and align with industry best practices.

[emphasis added] p. pp. 53-54
ed by the experience - 21 of program operation. There are also costs to formalizing every detail of the program logic in - 22 every case, where an iterative approach may produce effective results. 23 - 24 Further, EfficiencyOne submits tha...

AI summary EfficiencyOne highlights program operation costs and the importance of stakeholder consultation in setting incentive levels for demand-side management (DSM). It notes that incentive levels were not previously addressed in DSM applications, leading to the filing of Undertaking U-4, with references to the Public Utilities Act.

18 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK p. pp. 55-57
18 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK 19 20 The introduction of the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act in 2014 21 brought with it a revised legislative framework for the delivery of demand side management 22 activities in...

AI summary The 2014 Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring Act revised Nova Scotia's legislative framework for demand-side management (DSM), requiring NS Power to negotiate with EfficiencyOne. The legislation assigns the Board authority to determine DSM investment levels, considering 'affordability' (undefined). EfficiencyOne argues undefined affordability hinders negotiations but cites the Quantum Agreement as evidence of balancing short-term and long-term DSM benefits.

62381Closing Submission - Industrial Group 2 passages
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD p. p. 2
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380 as amended IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by EfficiencyOne for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservat...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board is considering EfficiencyOne's application for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. The matter involves establishing a final agreement and approving a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan under the Public Utilities Act.

28. And later: p. pp. 8-9
riced. If you don't need it there's no point in selling it. The same goes for DSM. So you have to look at what the needs of the system are in terms of capacity, energy and reliability.[21](#page-9-0) 32. It is not the role of the Board to...

AI summary The Board rejects propping up industries, emphasizing job creation is a provincial policy matter. It notes businesses outside E1 can deliver efficiency. The Board stresses system needs for capacity, energy, and reliability over DSM programs. Nichent's intervention highlights alternative providers.

62386Final Submission - Ecology Action Centre 1 passage
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD p. p. 0
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF: Application by EfficiencyOne for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between Effici...

AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks approval for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc., focusing on energy efficiency and conservation. The proceeding also addresses the approval of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan, aiming to establish a final agreement between the parties under the Public Utilities Act.

62457Reply Submission - NSDOE 2 passages
Section 1 p. p. 0
Stephen T. McGrath Team Lead July 15, 2015 Via E-Mail: ([email protected]) Doreen Fdis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 3fl Floor, 1601 Lower Water Street Halifax NS B3J 3S3 Dear M...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Department of Energy clarifies that the $35 million cap for DSM programs was a transitional measure under the Public Utilities Act and asserts the proposed spending is unaffordable. This responds to the Consumer Advocate's claim that the cap aligns with EfficiencyOne's proposal and implies provincial approval.

Section 2 p. p. 0
utility under the Public Utilities Act.4 However, the Closing Submissions of the Consumer Advocate, page 2. 2 Closing Submissions of the Consumer Advocate, page 2. Exhibit E-61, Item 2. &# x27;Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380,s....

AI summary The Consumer Advocate's submission is challenged for not considering NSPI's 8-year cost recovery period, arguing that amortizing DSM settlement amounts under the Public Utilities Act's section 79R ensures consistency with transitional expenditures.

62458Rebuttal Submission - EfficiencyOne 3 passages
EfficiencyOne p. p. 0
EfficiencyOne IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380, as amended. - and - IN THE MATTER OF An Application pursuant to Subsection 79J(3) of the Public Utilities Act for Approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement f...

AI summary The document pertains to a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act, involving an application for approval of a 2016-2018 supply agreement focused on electricity efficiency and conservation activities. The application is made under Subsection 79J(3) of the Act.

Preamble p. p. 2
Please accept the following as EfficiencyOne's rebuttal submission following the hearing on its - Application for Approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and - Conservation Activities and the filing of closing...

AI summary EfficiencyOne submits its rebuttal to the Board, arguing that it has fulfilled its obligations under the Public Utilities Act by providing an affordable DSM plan for Nova Scotia. It responds to claims by NS Power and the Industrial Group that it failed in its obligations, asserting that there is no evidence or argument to deter approval of its modified DSM Resource Plan.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT p. pp. 2-4
COMPLIANCE WITH THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - NS Power has stated that EfficiencyOne has failed to discharge its burden under the Public - Utilities Act : - E1 has failed to discharge the burden placed on it under the Act. E1 has not - provid...

AI summary NS Power argues EfficiencyOne failed to justify its DSM programs and expenditure under the Public Utilities Act, citing insufficient evidence to prove affordability and customer benefit. The claim references NS Power's closing submission, page 49.

62460Reply Submission - NSPI 1 passage
Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board
Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended. -and- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by EfficiencyOne for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Cons...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board is considering an application by EfficiencyOne for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc., along with establishing a final agreement and approving a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan under the Public Utilities Act.

62462Letter from SBA re not filing reply submission 1 passage
Section 1 p. p. 0
BLACKBURN ENGLISH BARRISTERS A A SOLICITORS E.A. Nelson Blackburn, Q.C. David F. English, B.Comm., LLB Joseph M.J. Cooper, Q.C. Janet Nolan Conrad, B.A., LLB Paul B. Miller, MBA, LLB Derek M. Land, B.A., LLB Martha L. Beyea, LLB Ellen R. B...

AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks approval for a 2016-2018 supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. under the Public Utilities Act. The Small Business Advocate confirms no reply submissions will be filed, reaffirming prior submissions dated July 8, 2015.

62745Board Decision 18 passages
R IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT p. p. 0
R IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT -and- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION for Approval of a Supply Agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, the estab...

AI summary The document outlines a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act regarding an application by EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for approval of a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities, and the establishment of a final agreement and a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan.

2.0 BACKGROUND p. p. 0
2.0 BACKGROUND - [6] The Board considers it useful to set out some of the background of DSM in Nova Scotia to provide some context for this Decision. - [7] For a number of years prior to 2010, NSPI included requests for approval of spendin...

AI summary The document outlines the transition of DSM administration in Nova Scotia from NSPI to ENSC, established under the ENSC Act. The Board required approval for ENSC's programs and cost allocations, with oversight mandated by the EECR Act (2014), which amended the PUA and repealed the ENSC Act, reshaping DSM governance.

3.1 Evaluation Report of 2014 DSM Programs (Econoler) p. p. 0
portfolio included seven programs which consisted of 16 components and initiatives. Econoler evaluated all 16 in addition to Codes and Standards. The series of reports were filed on February 27, 2015. [31] A revised version of the Home Ene...

AI summary Econoler evaluated Nova Scotia's 2014 DSM programs, achieving 151.9 GWh energy savings, exceeding the 137.8 GWh target by 10.2%. However, concerns were raised about the Home Energy Report's methodology, including data confidentiality issues and validation of adjustments. The evaluation included 71 recommendations, down from 122 in the 2013 report.

3.2 Verification Report of 2014 OSM Programs (Peach) p. p. 0
on (State and Local Energy Efficiency Action Network) Evaluation Protocol for behaviour-based programs, and is also strongly recommended in the Universal Methods Protocol for behaviour-based programs. [45] Similar to the Econoler recommend...

AI summary Dr. Peach's verification report assesses the 2014 OSM programs, highlighting flawed evaluation protocols and recommending improved methods using NSPI databases. He notes 1.3% energy savings align with HER studies but cautions against accepting results due to methodological flaws. Behavioral programs are classified as enabling strategies, not primary DSM tools, with recommendations for evaluation improvements.

3.3 Status of 2013 and 2014 Verification and Evaluation Recommendations p. p. 0
3.3 Status of 2013 and 2014 Verification and Evaluation Recommendations [49] In Appendix C, attached to its application, El included Table 1 - Update on Implementation of 2013 Verification Recommendations, and Table 2 - Update on Implement...

AI summary The document outlines the status of 2013 and 2014 verification and evaluation recommendations, noting most were completed, with some deferred. EfficiencyOne confirmed reliance on 2015 evidence, though evaluation reports raised concerns about Home Energy Report savings, and verification reports rejected those results. Dr. Peach's evidence addressed these issues.

3.5 Proposed 2016-18 DSM Resource Plan p. p. 0
3.5 Proposed 2016-18 DSM Resource Plan

AI summary The document outlines the proposed 2016-18 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, focusing on energy efficiency initiatives under the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act (EECR) and Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NSPI) compliance with regulatory frameworks.

3.5.1 Program Development p. p. 0
ensuring that DSM can be gradually "ramped up" in future years, as needed. It addresses long-term affordability through avoidance of new capacity additions until 2032, [El Closing Submission) p. 31] [58] NSPI was the only other party to su...

AI summary The document discusses NSPI's recommendation for a DSM plan that could provide annual energy savings of 100 GWh with associated demand savings, at a cost of $22 million per year. NSPI emphasized the importance of affordability under the PUA and noted that Nova Scotia's leadership in renewable energy and environmental policies has led to higher electricity rates compared to other jurisdictions.

3.5.2.1 Findings p. p. 0
3.5.2.1 Findings [71] The CA summarized his view of the purpose of a DSM program: The basic purpose is to reduce the level of energy required by Nova Scotia in the future, both short and long term. DSM programs are an integral component in...

AI summary The CA emphasizes the importance of DSM programs in reducing energy demand and supporting Nova Scotia's energy strategy. The Board criticizes the NSPI Plan for significantly reducing residential DSM spending and disconnecting from the IRP's long-term cost-saving goals. The El Plan is viewed as more aligned with the PUA and IRP, though concerns remain about past underspending and overachievement of energy savings targets by El.

3.5.3 Affordability p. p. 0
3.5.3 Affordability - [76] Having determined the parameters of a preferred plan, the Board is specifically directed by the 2014 amendments to the PUA to address the issue of affordability. The most relevant sections are Section 79L(8) and...

AI summary The Board is directed by 2014 PUA amendments to assess affordability in DSM programs under Section 79L(9). Affordability, previously considered in rate shock discussions and Annual Capital Expenditure Plans, now requires explicit evaluation. The Industrial Group highlights affordability's importance in its posthearing submission, while the Board must determine if Section 79L(9) alters its assessment of DSM expenditures.

3.6 Performance Targets, Indicators, and Thresholds p. p. 0
3.6 Performance Targets, Indicators, and Thresholds [108] El proposed that the performance targets be cumulative annual energy and peak demand savings at the end of the three year period at the portfolio level and the performance indicator...

AI summary El proposes cumulative energy and peak demand savings targets over three years, with annual reporting on incremental and lifetime savings. The threshold is 90% of targets, confirmed at 405.9 GWh and 62.5 MW. The Board reduced DSM expenditures, potentially impacting targets. El will also report on ratepayer benefits and customer satisfaction, though not as performance indicators.

3.10 Agreed form of Supply Agreement p. p. 0
3.10 Agreed form of Supply Agreement [120] El included an Agreed Form of Supply Agreement as Appendix J of its application, effective January 2016. The Supply Agreement generally outlines the terms and conditions which each party is expect...

AI summary El submitted an Agreed Form of Supply Agreement as Appendix J, effective January 2016, outlining terms under the PUA. Some schedules were left blank pending the Board's decision and Compliance Filing.

3.11 Compliance with Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act p. p. 0
3.11 Compliance with Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act [122] Section 79J of the PUA contemplates that El and NSPI will enter into an agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation. That implies to the...

AI summary The Board emphasizes the need for good faith negotiations between El and NSPI under the PUA regarding DSM budgets. Despite significant litigation and costs, the parties eventually reached a Consensus Agreement. The Board criticizes the unnecessary litigation and highlights that ratepayers fund both parties' activities.

3.12 Establishment of a Standardized Filing for Future Applications to approve a DSM Supply Agreement p. p. 0
3.12 Establishment of a Standardized Filing for Future Applications to approve a DSM Supply Agreement [124] The Consensus Agreement proposed to establish a standardized filing for future applications by El. The parties to the Consensus Agr...

AI summary The Consensus Agreement proposes a standardized filing for future DSM Supply Agreement applications, including energy savings, cost-effectiveness analysis, and rate impact details. The matter is referred to the DSM Advisory Group for recommendations. El agrees to provide technical data in future plans.

4.0 LETTERS OF COMMENT AND PUBLIC SPEAKERS p. p. 0
ogramming for low income renters within the Plan approved by the Board. [136] The Board notes, however, its limited role, as pointed out by Counsel for the Industrial Group in its closing submission: 32. It is not the role of the Board to...

AI summary The Board clarifies its limited role in job creation and affordability under the Public Utilities Act (PUA), emphasizing that job creation is a provincial policy matter. It reaffirms its focus on ensuring DSM plans align with customer interests and affordability, noting that businesses outside E1's preferred providers can deliver efficiency programs.

5.0 SUMMARY OF BOARD FINDINGS p. p. 0
aving considered the history of underspending on DSM programming, the history of overachieving savings and demand targets, and as an inducement to bring greater rigor to the calculation of incentives. [142] The Board considers that the tar...

AI summary The Board approves the DSM Plan, finding it achievable within approved spending, but rejects the Quantum Agreement. It emphasizes long-term cost considerations over short-term affordability, approves aspects of the Quantum Agreement, and endorses the Consensus Agreement with referrals to the DSM Advisory Group. The TRC cost-effectiveness screening remains in place.

Preamble p. p. 0
M06733 IN THE MATtER OF: THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT And IN THE MATtER OF: An application by EfficiencyOneforApproval of a Supply Agreementfor Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between Efficiencyone ("El") and Nova Scotia Pow...

AI summary This document outlines a consensus agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc. regarding the approval of a supply agreement and the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. The agreement was reached after evidence was filed and information requests were addressed by the Co-Applicants and intervenors.

Consensus Agreement p. p. 0
Consensus Agreement M06733 IN THE MATtER OF: THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT And IN THE MATtER OF: An application by EfficiencyOneforApprovat of a Supply Agreementfor Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between EfficiencyOne and No...

AI summary EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) reached a consensus agreement on the approval of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan and Supply Agreement under the Public Utilities Act. The agreement outlines terms for electricity efficiency and conservation activities, with parties reserving the right to amend positions based on further evidence. Key stakeholders, including intervenors and advocates, are acknowledged.

4) COST ALLOCATION p. p. 0
4) COST ALLOCATION - a) The Parties agree to collaboratively work to develop new OSM cost allocation and p5Mcost recovery models to be submitted by October 31) 2015 for approval or Decision by the Board, or within a reasonable period of ti...

AI summary Parties agree to develop OSM cost allocation and p5M cost recovery models by October 31, 2015, for Board approval. Key items include 2015 and 2016-2018 allocations, 2014 RSA, and mid-course adjustments. Nova Scotia Power retains discretion in DSM cost treatment.

63105Compliance Filing 2 passages
EfficiencyOne p. p. 0
EfficiencyOne IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380, as amended. - and - IN THE MATTER OF An Application pursuant to Subsection 79J(3) of the Public Utilities Act for Approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement f...

AI summary The document pertains to a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380, involving an application for approval of a 2016-2018 supply agreement focused on electricity efficiency and conservation activities.

FINANCING DEFERRALS p. p. 8
FINANCING DEFERRALS - The Board directed EfficiencyOne to enter into discussions with the Department of Energy and - commercial lenders to determine if there is a less expensive method to finance deferrals, and, if - so, whether that metho...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board directed EfficiencyOne to explore cheaper financing methods for deferrals with the Department of Energy and commercial lenders, authorized under the Public Utilities Act. In 2015, EfficiencyOne commissioned Grant Thornton to assess financing options for Demand Side Management, leveraging a UARB-approved supply contract with Nova Scotia Power.

63106Supply Agreement 2 passages
1 p. p. 4
1 26 27 28 which are NOW THEREFORE witnesses that in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and obligations herein and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of hereby acknowledged, the parties a...

AI summary The text outlines the interpretation section of an agreement between NSPI and EfficiencyOne, defining key terms such as 'Act' as the Public Utilities Act, and 'Business Day' as Monday to Friday excluding holidays in Nova Scotia.

43 p. p. 27
43 SCHEDULE C (PAGE 1 OF 2) 21 22 23 24 25 26 And whereas in accordance with the Supply Agreement, and the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act (Nova Scotia) and the Public Utilities Act (Nova Scotia) (together hereinafter referred...

AI summary The text outlines a confidentiality agreement between parties involved in a supply agreement, governed by the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act and the Public Utilities Act of Nova Scotia, with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board's direction. It establishes terms for handling confidential information exchanged between the parties.

63151Supply Agreement Blackline Feb Application v. Sep Compliance Filing 2 passages
1 p. p. 4
1 23 24 25 D. Pursuant to the Act, NSPI shall meet its obligations by entering into an agreement with the Franchise Holder for the supply of cost-effective Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities. 26 27 28 NOW THEREFORE witnesse...

AI summary NSPI is required to enter into an agreement with the Franchise Holder to provide cost-effective Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities under the Public Utilities Act. The agreement outlines terms and definitions, including the interpretation of key terms such as 'Act' and 'Agreement'.

JSupply Agreement for Compliance Filing p. p. 28
JSupply Agreement for Compliance Filing 1 SCHEDULE D 2 3 CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT 4 5 THIS CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT made this day of, 2015 6 7 Between: 8 9 EfficiencyOne, hereinafter "EfficiencyOne" 10 Party of the Firs...

AI summary This document outlines a confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, related to a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities. The agreement is governed by the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act and the Public Utilities Act of Nova Scotia, and subject to oversight by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.

63292Supply Agreement EfficiencyOne and NSPI Form of Agreement Final Executed in Counterparts 2 passages
1. INTERPRETATION p. pp. 0-4
1. INTERPRETATION - 1.1 The following terms shall be interpreted as follows in this Agreement: - (a) " Act " shall mean the Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended from time to time. - (b) " Agreement " means this agreement...

AI summary The document defines key terms in an agreement between NSPI and EfficiencyOne, including the 'Act' (Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380), 'Agreement' (the contract with attached schedules), and 'Business Day' (excluding holidays in Nova Scotia).

Preamble p. p. 28
And whereas in accordance with the Supply Agreement, and the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act (Nova Scotia) and the Public Utilities Act (Nova Scotia) (together hereinafter referred to as the "Legislation"), and as may be direct...

AI summary The text outlines a preamble to an agreement between parties involved in a regulatory proceeding, referencing legislation such as the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act and the Public Utilities Act, and the role of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board in overseeing the process.

63307Board Order 4 passages
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT p. p. 3
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION for Approval of a Supply Agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, the estab...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board considered an application by EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for approval of a supply agreement, final agreement establishment, and a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan. Intervenors included consumer advocates, industry groups, and environmental organizations. A public hearing was held, and a decision was issued on August 12, 2015.

1. INTERPRETATION p. p. 3
1. INTERPRETATION - 1.1 The following terms shall be interpreted as follows in this Agreement: - (a) "Act" shall mean the Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended from time to time. - (b) "Agreement" means this agreement betw...

AI summary The section defines key terms in the agreement between NSPI and EfficiencyOne, including the 'Act' as the Public Utilities Act, the 'Agreement' as the contract between NSPI and EfficiencyOne, and 'Business Day' as Monday to Friday excluding holidays in Nova Scotia.

Preamble p. p. 26
And whereas in accordance with the Supply Agreement, and the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act (Nova Scotia) and the Public Utilities Act (Nova Scotia) (together hereinafter referred to as the "Legislation"), and as may be direct...

AI summary The text outlines agreements between parties regarding the handling of confidential information under the Supply Agreement, Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act, and Public Utilities Act, with oversight by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.

SCHEDULE B Consensus Agreement p. p. 73
SCHEDULE B Consensus Agreement WEPUBUC UTILITIESACT An application by EfficiencyOneforApproval ofaSupply Agreementfor Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia PowerInc., the establishment ofo...

AI summary EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) seek approval for a Supply Agreement and the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. The Consensus Agreement outlines terms approved by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB), with parties reserving the right to amend positions based on further evidence. Key stakeholders include the Consumer Advocate, Small Business Advocate, and Ecology Action Centre.

63791Grant Thornton Report - Financing Demand Side Management 6 passages
Section 16 p. p. 9
- October 1, 2010 – December 31, 2014 - The responsibility and accountability for DSM administration was transferred from NSPI to ENSC - effective October 1, 2010. ENSC was an independent non-profit company that received funding both - fro...

AI summary The responsibility for DSM administration was transferred from NSPI to ENSC in 2010. ENSC was funded by ratepayers and the Nova Scotia government. In 2015, ENSC ceased to provide DSM, and the Efficiency Nova Scotia franchise was created and awarded to a new provider for a 9-year term from 2016 to 2024.

Section 17 p. p. 9
ract with the province of Nova Scotia. The franchise was awarded for a 9 - year term from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2024, with an initial one-year transition period - added to the term for 2015. - EfficiencyOne was granted the first...

AI summary EfficiencyOne was granted the exclusive Efficiency Nova Scotia franchise, transferring ENSC's assets and obligations (except HST claims) effective January 1, 2015. NSPI is mandated by regulation to implement cost-effective electricity efficiency programs. Legal frameworks include the Public Utilities Act and the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring Act.

Section 18 p. p. 9
ivities that are reasonably available in an effort to reduce costs for its customers. Public Utilities Act, section 79A to 79V, and Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act.

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) is implementing demand-side management (DSM) initiatives to reduce customer costs through available efficiency activities. The proceeding references the Public Utilities Act (sections 79A-79V) and the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act as legal frameworks governing these efforts.

Summary of Consensus Agreement[5](#page-12-3) p. p. 13
igorous program for determining incentives, which should be filed with the UARB by March 31, 2016. - In future application, EfficiencyOne is to provide one or more alternate scenarios of DSM budgets for the UARB to consider, and NSPI is to...

AI summary The consensus agreement outlines requirements for EfficiencyOne to submit an incentive program to UARB by March 31, 2016, and NSPI's role in rate impact analysis. The DOE raised concerns about deferring DSM costs under the Public Utilities Act, while UARB questioned the high financing cost (7.78%) for deferred costs and urged exploring cheaper alternatives.

Proposed financing process and timeline p. pp. 26-27
Proposed financing process and timeline 608 609 financing. We propose the following next steps and associated timeline in support of securing long term 647 information or data contained in this Report. 648 We certify that we have no active...

AI summary The document outlines a proposed financing process and timeline, referencing legal acts, efficiency plans, and agreements related to energy efficiency in Nova Scotia. It includes certifications, appendices, and evidence submitted to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.

January 1, 2015 and onwards p. p. 34
January 1, 2015 and onwards Revisions to the Public Utilities Act , proposed through the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act , were proclaimed on May 1, 2014. Some of the highlights are as follows1: - ENSC ceas...

AI summary Revisions to the Public Utilities Act via the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act led to ENSC's dissolution as Nova Scotia's DSM provider. The Efficiency Nova Scotia franchise was awarded to E1, a new not-for-profit corporation, effective January 1, 2015, with a 9-year term. E1 inherited ENSC's assets, except for unresolved HST liabilities, which remained with ENS Transition Corporation.

63792E1 Covering Letter from E1 (Gogan) 1 passage
Section 2 p. p. 0
ember 13, 2015 In its decision in this matter, the Board recognized the concerns raised by various stakeholders and directed EfficiencyOne to explore more cost effective avenues to finance deferrals: [91] The DOE raised the issue of deferr...

AI summary The Board directed EfficiencyOne to explore cheaper financing options for DSM deferrals, noting the high cost of NSPI's rate base (7.78%) compared to bank financing (3%). EfficiencyOne engaged Grant Thornton to research financing methods, with results due by November 16, 2015. The Board emphasized the need for cost-effective solutions, while EfficiencyOne highlighted potential external financing with NS Power's backstopping.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →