8. The board should require the evidence — not guess at it The Board does not need to conduct a general audit of NSP. It needs to decide a much narrower question: Did the DRO establish, with evidence from NSP, that the additional costs cla...
AI summary The Board is advised not to conduct a general audit of NSP but instead focus on whether the DRO provided sufficient evidence from NSP that the additional costs for Work Order #6873680 were incurred and properly attributable to the Project. The Board should ensure that records exist, and if not, NSP should explain the situation.
10. Relief requested - 1. Set aside the Final Written Decision of the Dispute Resolution Officer. - 2. Determine that the additional backhoe variance of $9,018.67 has not been substantiated and direct that this amount be removed from the a...
AI summary The relief requested includes setting aside a Dispute Resolution Officer's decision, removing unsubstantiated charges, correcting an account, and requiring Nova Scotia Power to refund any credit balance. The request also asks for clarification on any remaining amounts due.
Don Farmer, P. Eng., Dispute Resolution Officer (D.R.O.) Telephone (902) 428-6202, Toll-free 1-877-428-6202, Fax (902) 835-7744 [email protected] Charlton Krentz acting as Agent for the Account of Joanna Hammersley After revie...
AI summary Don Farmer, the Dispute Resolution Officer (DRO), outlines his role in resolving disputes between Nova Scotia Power and its customers. He emphasizes that he is not an employee of Nova Scotia Power or the Energy Board, and his decisions are binding on the company but not on customers, who may appeal to the Board.