Topic:"Stakeholder Engagement" in M08929

Appendix G: 8760 Data (hourly savings per sector for all 25 years of the Study) (Excel tool to be filed electronically). Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board Page 2 of 7 August 14, 2019 As indicated above, Appendices C, D, E, F and G are E...

AI summary EfficiencyOne requests electronic filing of Excel tools for the 2019 DSM Potential Study, detailing stakeholder engagement processes. The study involved DSMAG members and included milestones like scope-of-work reviews and modelling plan discussions.

stakeholders the final scope of work incorporating the comments received from Stakeholders. • Navigant’s Potential Study assumptions and modelling plan: o March 22, 2019: Navigant released the Potential Study assumptions and modelling plan...

AI summary The document outlines Navigant's iterative process of releasing and revising studies (Potential and Baseline) for stakeholder review, with the DSMAG providing feedback through comment periods and technical conferences. Key dates include draft releases, revisions, and stakeholder engagement activities from March 2019 to August 2019.

releases additional 8760 energy savings data reflective of Navigant’s “Base Case” scenario. o August 2, 2019: Reply to stakeholder comments released to DSMAG. Throughout each phase of the Potential Study development EfficiencyOne received...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's DSM Potential Study incorporated stakeholder feedback during development, resulting in a comprehensive report to inform the 2020 Integrated Resource Plan. The process included multiple engagement phases with DSMAG and detailed documentation of comment incorporation in Appendix A.

an enhanced consultation E1 revised the final Scope of Work by providing a stakeholder process. engagement schedule and adding the following additional items: • A comment period for stakeholders to examine and comment on the successful pro...

AI summary E1 revised the Scope of Work to enhance stakeholder engagement by adding comment periods for draft study assumptions and results, extending them to two weeks. Enhanced transparency requirements include making model inputs and outputs available for review and requiring proponents to disclose model limitations.

rting on E1 revised the final Scope of Work to include specific requirements and the low-income residential segment disaggregation of results for Low-Income Nova Scotians. separately. Consider the following when modelling E1 revised the fi...

AI summary EfficiencyOne revised the Scope of Work to include low-income residential disaggregation and updated criteria for achievable potential studies, emphasizing commercially available measures, Codes/Standards, and stakeholder feedback. The draft Potential Study Assumptions and Modelling Plan was shared with DSMAG for review, with comments addressed in the final document.

ntial, screened using the Program Administrator cost test, as part of the Draft Results package shared with the DSMAG. A scenario should be provided in the All achievable potential scenarios have been prepared in such a manner Potential St...

AI summary The document outlines EfficiencyOne's (E1) submission of a Potential Study and Baseline Study Report to the DSMAG, emphasizing the use of only commercially-available technologies. Stakeholder feedback was sought, with E1 addressing concerns by providing detailed sources for assumptions and incremental costs in July 2019.

the Draft Potential Study Report on July 15, 2019. Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board Page 7 of 7 August 14, 2019 (including incremental costs assumptions) to stakeholders. Consider using updated avoided costs. The 2019 DSM Potential Stu...

AI summary The document discusses stakeholder feedback on the 2019 DSM Potential Study, emphasizing the use of outdated 2014 IRP avoided costs and the need for stakeholder engagement. EfficiencyOne (E1) addressed concerns by enhancing transparency and incorporating stakeholder input into the IRP process.

importance of stakeholder participation in the Potential Study process, and has considered all feedback provided by stakeholders. EfficiencyOne intends to respect the filing date of August 14, 2019, established by the UARB, for the Final 2...

AI summary EfficiencyOne commits to respecting the August 14, 2019 filing deadline for the 2019 DSM Potential Study and participating in the 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process. The study, prepared by Navigant, emphasizes stakeholder feedback and engagement in the DSM planning process.

TABLE OF CONTENTS E. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 1 E.1 Estimation of Energy Efficiency Potential ..............................................................

AI summary The document outlines a study estimating energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) potential, including findings on EE and DR results. It details the report's structure, stakeholder engagement, limitations, and interpretation of results, emphasizing program design and measure characterization caveats.

e 1-1 summarizes the various elements of the project scope. Figure 1-1. Summary of Project Scope Element Dimensions Forms of Energy Electricity Energy Efficiency (Energy and Demand) and Demand Response Type of Potential Technical, Economic...

AI summary The document outlines the scope of a 25-year energy efficiency and demand response study for Nova Scotia, covering residential and business sectors, including nonprofit and institutional buildings. Stakeholder engagement began in 2018, with input incorporated to enhance the study's accuracy and relevance.

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 7 0 0 0 13 0 0 11 0 0 13 13 0 0 4 10 0 33 33 9 13 33 20 0 33 13 0 13 8 0 3 5 7 0 0 0 13 0 20 0 0 0 13 0 8 0 2 5 7 0 0 0 13 0 0 11 0 0 13 0 8 0 1 24 20 33 33 27 13 33 20 0 33 13 13 25 33 67 0 - Completely unfamilia...

AI summary The text presents a table with numerical data, likely representing survey responses or metrics related to a regulatory proceeding. It includes categories such as 'Completely unfamiliar' and 'TOP 3 (8-10)', suggesting it may be related to stakeholder engagement or program participation metrics. The data appears to be aggregated and may be used for analysis in the proceeding.

ŶĚƌĞůĂƚĞĚƉĂƌƚƐŵĂLJĨĞƚĐŚĂƐŵƵĐŚĂƐ ƐĂůǀĂŐĞǀĂůƵĞ͘dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ƌŽƚŽƌ͕ƐƚĂƚŽƌ͕ƐŚĂĨƚƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŵŝƐĐĞůůĂŶĞŽƵƐƉĂƌƚƐŽŶƐƵĐŚĂƵŶŝƚŵĂLJ ŚĂǀĞĂƚŽƚĂůƐĂůǀĂŐĞǀĂůƵĞŽĨĂďŽƵƚ ƚ   ϮϬϬƚŽŶŵŽďŝůĞĐƌĂŶĞŵĂLJďĞŶĞĞĚĞĚƚŽŚĂŶĚůĞĂŵŽĚĞƌĂ...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation of a fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism and its impact on rate structures and cost recovery, highlighting the need for alignment between base rates and actual costs. It also references the importance of regulatory oversight and stakeholder engagement in addressing these issues.

ŽƐĂů͘ x ZĞŵŽǀĞŽǀĞƌŚĞĂĚƌŝĚŐĞƌĂŶĞĂŶĚƐƚŽĐŬƉŝůĞĚƚƵƌďŽŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌŵĂŝŶĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͕ƐŽƌƚĂŶĚƐƚŽĐŬƉŝůĞĂƚ ƐŝƚĞĨŽƌƐĂůǀĂŐĞĂŶĚĚŝƐƉŽƐĂů͘ x ŝƐŵĂŶƚůĞĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌǁĂůůƐĂŶĚƌĞůĂƚĞĚĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͕ƐƚŽĐŬƉŝůĞĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůĨŽƌĚŝƐƉŽƐĂů͘/...

AI summary The text discusses concerns related to regulatory processes, including fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, program evaluations, and the impact of policy decisions on energy efficiency and affordability. It also addresses the need for stakeholder engagement and the importance of ensuring equitable access to energy programs.

 ZĞͲĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƚŚĞƌŝǀĞƌŽƵƚůĞƚĨƌŽŵ>ĂŬĞZŽƐƐŝŐŶŽůĂƐĂŶĚǁŚĞƌĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘ x /ŶĨŝůů ĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ ƐƵďƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĞdžĐĂǀĂƚŝŽŶ ǁŝƚŚ ĐŽŵƉĂĐƚĞĚ ĐůĞĂŶ ŐƌĂŶƵůĂƌ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ƚĂŝůƌĂĐĞ ĐŽĨĨĞƌĚĂŵ͘dŚĞĐŽĨĨĞƌĚĂŵĐĂŶƌĞŵĂŝŶŽŶĐĞŐƌĂĚĞĚƚŽ...

AI summary The text discusses the challenges related to the regulatory process, including the need for accurate fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, issues with rate structures, and the importance of proper asset management and compliance with regulatory standards. It also touches upon the need for effective program evaluations and stakeholder engagement.

' ^d/Dd ^hDDZz&KZ^^ dZ d/Z D EdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ   x ŝƐƉŽƐĂůŽĨĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶĚĞďƌŝƐʹƚƌƵĐŬƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƚŽĂĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚĞĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ ĚĞďƌŝƐĚŝƐƉŽƐĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJ͕ǁŚŝůĞƐƵŝƚĂďůĞŽƚŚĞƌŵĂƚĞ...

AI summary The text discusses the importance of accurate and timely cost recovery mechanisms in utility regulation, emphasizing the need for alignment between base rates and actual costs. It highlights the role of regulatory oversight in ensuring fair and efficient energy management practices, including the need for prudence reviews and stakeholder engagement.

ǁŝƚŚ ĐůĞĂŶ ŐƌĂǀĞů ĂŶĚ ĐƌƵƐŚĞĚ ƐƚŽŶĞ͕ ĂƐ ǁĞůů ĂƐ ĐůĞĂŶ Ĩŝůů ĂƐ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘'ƌĂĚĞƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƐ͕ŚLJĚƌŽͲƐĞĞĚĂŶĚͬƉůĂŶƚƚƌĞĞƐŽƌŽƚŚĞƌǀĞŐĞƚĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƌĞƚƵƌŶƚŚŝƐĂƌĞĂƚŽĂŶĞĂƌ ŶĂƚƵƌĂůƐƚĂƚĞ͘    ϲϵ     REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFO...

AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of a hydro asset study, focusing on the analysis of costs, benefits, and implications of various energy-related initiatives, including potential impacts on affordability, efficiency, and resource planning. It also touches on regulatory considerations and stakeholder engagement.

ƐƐƵŵĞĚ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞƌĞ ǁŝůů ďĞ ŶŽ ŽƵƚƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐ ĂƐďĞƐƚŽƐ ĂďĂƚĞŵĞŶƚ Žƌ ŽƚŚĞƌ ŚĂnjĂƌĚŽƵƐŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐŽƌĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůŝƐƐƵĞƐĂƚƚŚŝƐƐŝƚĞƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚĂĚǀĞƌƐĞůLJĂĨĨĞĐƚĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶ ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͘EŽƚĞƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƌĞŝƐĂŵƉůĞŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůůĂLJĚŽǁŶĂƌĞĂĂǀĂŝů...

AI summary The text discusses the need for improved energy efficiency and conservation measures, including the implementation of a demand-side management plan and the importance of ensuring that rate structures are aligned with actual costs. It also touches on the role of regulatory oversight and the need for proper stakeholder engagement in the process.

x ĞŵŽůŝƐŚ ƐƵƉĞƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌ ǁĂůůƐ ĂŶĚ ƌĞůĂƚĞĚ ĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͕ ƐƚŽĐŬƉŝůĞ ĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů ĨŽƌ ĚŝƐƉŽƐĂů͘ x ZĞŵŽǀĞĂŶĚĚĞŵŽůŝƐŚŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌĨůŽŽƌƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐůĂďĂŶĚƌĞůĂƚĞĚĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌƐƵƉƉŽƌƚǁĂůůƐĂƚƚŚĂƚ ůĞǀĞů͘^ƚ...

AI summary The text discusses issues related to energy efficiency, cost management, and regulatory processes, including topics such as fuel cost adjustments, program evaluations, and stakeholder engagement. It references the need for better alignment between base rates and actual costs, as well as the importance of managing energy efficiency programs effectively.

x /ŶƚĂŬĞůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶͲĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ͕ƉĞŶƐƚŽĐŬƉŝƉĞŝƐďƵƌŝĞĚďĞůŽǁŐƌŽƵŶĚ͖ x ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶʹĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ͕ZĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĂŶĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůƐƚĞĞů͖ x KƵƚůĞƚ ;ƌĂĨƚͲƚƵďĞͿ ůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ ʹ ĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ͕ Ă ůĞŶŐƚŚLJ ƚĂ...

AI summary The document outlines various regulatory considerations and issues related to energy management, including asset retirement obligations, fuel cost adjustments, and the impact of regulatory decisions on utility operations. It also discusses the need for comprehensive planning and stakeholder engagement in energy policy.

ĂƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͕ƐŽƌƚĂŶĚ ƐƚŽĐŬƉŝůĞĂƚƐŝƚĞĨŽƌƐĂůǀĂŐĞĂŶĚĚŝƐƉŽƐĂů͘ x ĞŵŽůŝƐŚĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌǁĂůůƐĂŶĚƌĞůĂƚĞĚĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͕ƐƚŽĐŬƉŝůĞĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůĨŽƌĚŝƐƉŽƐĂů͘ x ZĞŵŽǀĞĂŶĚĚĞŵŽůŝƐŚŵĂŝŶĨůŽŽƌƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐůĂď͘^ƚŽĐŬƉŝůĞĚĞŵŽ...

AI summary The text discusses various aspects of regulatory proceedings, including energy efficiency programs, cost recovery mechanisms, and the impact of fuel cost adjustments. It outlines concerns related to asset management, affordability, and stakeholder engagement in energy regulation.

Dd ^hDDZz&KZ^^ dZ d/Z D EdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ   x /ŶĨŝůůĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐƵďƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĞdžĐĂǀĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚĐŽŵƉĂĐƚĞĚĐůĞĂŶŐƌĂŶƵůĂƌŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƚŽƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐƚĂŝůƌĂĐĞ ĐŽĨĨĞƌĚĂŵƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘dŚĞĐŽĨĨĞƌĚĂŵĐĂŶƌĞŵĂŝŶŽŶĐĞŐƌĂ...

AI summary The document discusses issues related to the regulation of utility services, including the impact of fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, affordability concerns, and the need for improved billing procedures and energy efficiency programs. It also addresses the importance of stakeholder engagement and the regulatory oversight of utility operations.

/E' ^d/Dd ^hDDZz&KZ^^ dZ d/Z D EdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ   x /ŶĨŝůů ĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ ƐƵďƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĞdžĐĂǀĂƚŝŽŶ ǁŝƚŚ ĐŽŵƉĂĐƚĞĚ ŐƌĂŶƵůĂƌ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů ĂŶĚ ƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚ ĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶ ĚĞďƌŝƐƚŽƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐƚĂŝůƌĂĐĞĐŽĨĨĞƌĚĂŵƐ...

AI summary The text discusses the challenges and considerations in the regulatory process, including the need for accurate fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, the impact of rate proceedings, and the importance of program evaluations and stakeholder engagement. It highlights the need for transparency and effective communication in managing energy resources and customer programs.

ůŝƚŝŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůĨŽƌĚŝƐƉŽƐĂů͘ x ZĞŵŽǀĞ ĞdžƉŽƐĞĚ ŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌ ƐƚĞĞů ƉĂƌƚƐ͖ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ƐƚĞĞů ƉĞŶƐƚŽĐŬƐ ĂŶĚ ďƵƚƚĞƌĨůLJ ǀĂůǀĞƐ͕ ƚŚƌŽĂƚ ƌŝŶŐ͕ ƐƚĞĞů ĚƌĂĨƚͲƚƵďĞƉĂƌƚƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƌĞůĂƚĞĚŵŝƐĐĞůůĂŶĞŽƵƐŝƚĞŵƐ͘^ƚŽĐŬƉŝůĞĂŶĚƐŽƌƚĨŽƌƐĂůǀĂŐĞ...

AI summary The text discusses various aspects of energy regulation and management in Nova Scotia, including asset retirement obligations, program evaluations, and stakeholder engagement. It outlines the need for effective energy efficiency programs, cost recovery mechanisms, and regulatory oversight. Key topics include energy efficiency, stakeholder participation, and the importance of accurate forecasting.

ŝĚĞƐĂŵĞĂŶƐĨŽƌĐŽŶƚƌŽůůŝŶŐĨůŽǁƉĂƐƚĞĂĐŚŽĨƚŚĞƚƵƌďŝŶĞƐĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ ƚŚƌŽĂƚͲƌŝŶŐƐƚŽƚŚĞĚƌĂĨƚƚƵďĞĂŶĚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞƚĂŝůƌĂĐĞĐŚĂŶŶĞů͘ dŚĞƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞĐĂŶďĞĂĐĐĞƐƐĞĚǀŝĂƚŚĞƉĂǀĞĚZĂLJŶĂƌĚƚŽŶZŽĂĚ͕ǁŚŝĐŚŝƐĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJƚǁŽ ŵŝůĞƐŶŽƌƚ...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation of a fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism and its impact on rate structures, referencing specific programs and regulatory proceedings. It mentions the ZĂLJŶĂƌĚƚŽŶ ZŽĂĚ and related regulatory actions involving asset retirement obligations and stakeholder engagement.

ĂŶ ŐƌĂǀĞů ĂŶĚ ĐƌƵƐŚĞĚ ƐƚŽŶĞ͕ ĂƐ ǁĞůů ĂƐ ĐůĞĂŶ Ĩŝůů ĂƐ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘'ƌĂĚĞƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƐ͕ŚLJĚƌŽͲƐĞĞĚĂŶĚͬƉůĂŶƚƚƌĞĞƐŽƌŽƚŚĞƌǀĞŐĞƚĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƌĞƚƵƌŶƚŚŝƐĂƌĞĂƚŽĂŶĞĂƌ ŶĂƚƵƌĂůƐƚĂƚĞ͘ x 'ƌĂǀĞůǁŽŽĚƐƌŽĂĚƐŝŶƚŚĞĂƌĞĂƐŚŽƵůĚƌĞŵĂŝŶŝŶƉůĂ...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms on incentives and the need for adjustments in base rates to align with actual costs. It also mentions the challenges in managing energy efficiency and the importance of stakeholder engagement in regulatory processes.

ƚ͕ĂǁĂLJĨƌŽŵ'ŝƐďŽƌŶĞ ĂŶĚtƌĞĐŬŽǀĞ&ůŽǁĂŐĞ͘ dŚĞ ƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞĚ ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ ŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌͬƚƵƌďŝŶĞ ĨůŽŽƌ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞ ŝƐ ŝŶƚĞŐƌĂů ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ŽƵƚůĞƚ ĚƌĂĨƚƚƵďĞĂŶĚƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞƐƵďƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘ ĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐĨŽƌƚŚŝƐĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJǁŝůů...

AI summary The text discusses the regulatory process involving the fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism and its implications on incentives and cost management. It references a hydro asset study and mentions the importance of stakeholder engagement in the proceedings.

' ^d/Dd ^hDDZz&KZ^^ dZ d/Z D EdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ   ƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞ ŚĂƐ ďĞĞŶ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚ ŝƚ ǁŝůů ďĞ ŝŵƉƌĂĐƚŝĐĂů ƚŽ ĂƚƚĞŵƉƚ ƚŽ ĚĞŵŽůŝƐŚ ĂŶĚ ƌĞŵŽǀĞ ŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐĂŶĚŝŶĨŝůůƚŚĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJ...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation of a fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism and its impact on incentive structures, emphasizing the need for alignment between base rates and actual costs. It also references the importance of program evaluation and stakeholder engagement in regulatory processes.

PO Box 910 ● Halifax, Nova Scotia ● Canada ● B3J 2W5 December 16, 2019 Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 1692, Unit “M” Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear M...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) reports completion of the Pre-IRP phase, submission of the Pre-IRP Final Report, and development of the 2020 Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) Draft Terms of Reference (TOR) with consultants Synapse Energy Economics and Bates White Economic Consulting. Stakeholder feedback was solicited on the draft TOR.

(TOR) for the 2020 IRP. NS Power next circulated the draft TOR to stakeholders and requested comments and feedback. Comments were received from the following parties: December 16, 2019 D. Friis Stakeholder (and Consultant) Comments Receive...

AI summary NS Power circulated the draft TOR for the 2020 IRP, receiving stakeholder comments from organizations like Efficiency One, Consumer Advocate, and Halifax Regional Municipality. A matrix (Appendix B) summarizes comments and NS Power's responses, with some stakeholders planning further input by late December 2019.

December 2019 Attached are the comments received from the stakeholders as of today’s date and a matrix (Appendix B) setting out all comments by category and indicating NS Power’s response. Many of the comments received were with respect to...

AI summary NS Power submitted stakeholder comments on the 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process, revised the Terms of Reference (TOR), and requested approval for the draft TOR. The document outlines stakeholder feedback on scenario development, evaluation criteria, and modeling approaches, emphasizing ongoing engagement during IRP phases.

RP process. The Company will complete the IRP in Terms of collaboration with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board’s (UARB) Reference staff and its consultants. Stakeholder input is integral to the IRP process, which will establish the...

AI summary NS Power will develop an Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) in collaboration with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB), emphasizing stakeholder engagement, transparency, and compliance with OATT Standards of Conduct. The process includes workshops, draft material reviews, and public input to shape Nova Scotia's electricity future.

lay out the long-term Strategy, Roadmap and Action Plan for the future of electricity supply in Nova Scotia. Deliverables: Draft & Final IRP Report 3 A Reference Plan for use in the avoided cost calculations of energy and capacity from DSM...

AI summary The document outlines the process for developing Nova Scotia's Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), including a reference plan for avoided cost calculations in demand-side management (DSM). It details a timeline of stakeholder consultations, workshops, and submissions to the UARB for approval of the IRP Terms of Reference.

n 20 2020 Assumptions & Analysis Plan stakeholder workshop(s) Feb 2020 Stakeholder comments on Draft Assumptions and Analysis Plan Feb 14 2020 Final Assumptions & Analysis Plan issued Mar 5 2020 Modeling phase begins Mar 2020 9 IRP Terms o...

AI summary The timeline outlines the 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process, including stakeholder workshops, draft plan reviews, modeling phases, and submission of the final IRP report to the UARB by September 30, 2020.

Sept 30 2020 10 IRP Terms of Reference Consultation Appendix A Page 12 of 12 11 IRP Terms of Reference Consultation Appendix B Page 1 of 14 Stakeholder Issue Stakeholder Comments NS Power Response Category E1 Objectives It is encouraging t...

AI summary Stakeholders E1 and EAC commend NS Power's alignment of the IRP with climate change and decarbonization goals, noting appreciation for flexibility in objectives. NS Power confirms no changes are required to the IRP Terms of Reference.

14 IRP TERMS OF REFERENCE – STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS Stakeholder Issue Stakeholder Comments NS Power Response Category

AI summary The document outlines stakeholder comments on the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Terms of Reference (TOR), with NS Power providing responses. It highlights stakeholder engagement in the regulatory process related to the IRP.

14 IRP TERMS OF REFERENCE – STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS Stakeholder Issue Stakeholder Comments NS Power Response Category

AI summary The document outlines stakeholder comments on the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Terms of Reference (TOR), with NS Power providing responses. It highlights stakeholder engagement in the regulatory process related to the IRP.

Assumptions and the Analysis Plan and discussed with stakeholders. E1 Constraints / The TOR should indicate whether NS This is covered as part of the Process & Assumptions Power plans to do any stochastics and if Deliverables Step 1 – Esta...

AI summary The document discusses the Terms of Reference (TOR) for an Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), focusing on whether NS Power will use stochastic methods in its analysis. Stakeholder input is mentioned, with NS Power indicating consideration of stochastic approaches but not yet confirming their necessity for this exercise.

or contribution equivalent to 150-MW steam units that require a 20% reserve), rather than a mix of approaches. HRM Constraints / Will NSP validate its key assumptions? If NS Power will validate the IRP’s key Assumptions so, will it compare...

AI summary The document discusses NS Power's validation of Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) assumptions and stakeholder engagement processes. It raises concerns about equitable energy access as technologies develop, with NS Power stating the IRP focuses on lowest-cost strategies compliant with regulations rather than detailed access considerations.

8 of 14 IRP TERMS OF REFERENCE – STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS Stakeholder Issue Stakeholder Comments NS Power Response Category SBA Scenarios NSP should include, within scenarios or NS Power agrees with this comment. sensitivity, significant poten...

AI summary Stakeholder SBA requests NS Power to include significant potential breakthroughs in scenarios or sensitivity analyses within the IRP. NS Power agrees, stating this is addressed in their Process & Deliverables steps, including establishing an analysis plan and developing input assumptions through stakeholder engagement.

Input robust ‘what if’ testing. Assumptions and will be discussed with stakeholders. E1 Scenarios The TOR should describe the process by NS Power has not yet determined the which NS Power will engage with modeling plan and whether a stakeh...

AI summary The text discusses NS Power's Terms of Reference (TOR) for the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), focusing on stakeholder engagement in developing Candidate Resource Plans and scenarios. It raises a question about whether stakeholders can propose their own plans for modeling alongside NS Power's, and notes that stakeholder engagement is planned regardless of the modeling methodology.

of 14 IRP TERMS OF REFERENCE – STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS Stakeholder Issue Stakeholder Comments NS Power Response Category SWEB Miscellaneous Also, is NSPI considering any other The IRP will assess further renewable Development [Legislation] re...

AI summary Stakeholders provided feedback on the Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) Terms of Reference, emphasizing the need for transparency, long-term planning, and stakeholder engagement. NS Power responded by agreeing to incorporate recommendations and ensure collaboration throughout the process.

due to DSM, which are required for DSM 8 of the TOR accordingly. planning and monitoring of rate and bill impacts due to DSM. Page 10 of 14 IRP Terms of Reference Consultation Appendix B Page 11 of 14 IRP TERMS OF REFERENCE – STAKEHOLDER C...

AI summary The EAC raises concerns about the lack of formal participant status and funding for key stakeholders in the UARB process, which limits their ability to engage effectively, particularly without cost recovery. This is seen as a barrier to broader stakeholder involvement.

is an issue to be discussed with UARB as well as yourselves, but it’s a major barrier in involvement from stakeholders. AREA Process / The Purpose states that this exercise is NS Power’s IRP provides a roadmap to Engagement for the Utility...

AI summary The text discusses the importance of stakeholder engagement in the Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) process, highlighting a need for clearer purpose alignment with ratepayers and suggesting an addition to the schedule for stakeholder comments following a March 2020 workshop.

spent to better define these two components could assist in higher quality outcomes and more effective modelling runs. E1 Schedule EfficiencyOne anticipates that NS Power NS Power agrees with this comment and will receive extensive and mea...

AI summary EfficiencyOne suggests that NS Power should take more than a week to process stakeholder feedback on the Draft Assumptions and Analysis Plan before finalizing it, to ensure quality outcomes and effective modelling. NS Power agrees and has updated the TOR accordingly.

CA Schedule The TOR proposes the following NS Power acknowledges comments schedule for Comments on modeling about the report being “final” before results: stakeholder comment and has adjusted the language. NS Power has revised the • Final...

AI summary The text discusses a proposed schedule for comments on modeling results, with concerns raised about the timing and usefulness of stakeholder feedback if the modeling is labeled 'final' before review. NS Power revised the schedule to allow more time for stakeholder input and comments on early results.

need more than 2 weeks (and only ~1 week after their opportunity to ask questions in the workshop). Some of the other turn-around periods are tight, but none are as troublesome as the Final Modeling review. Page 13 of 14 IRP Terms of Refer...

AI summary Stakeholders have raised concerns about the tight two-week turnaround period for reviewing and responding to NSPI’s work, particularly during the Final Modeling review phase. They argue that this timeframe is insufficient for stakeholders to adequately analyze, consult, and formulate responses, especially given the complexity of the material.

esults. 4. The ToR should be modified to indicate that NS Power will select a Preferred Resource Plan and on what basis that decision will be made (i.e. interaction between objective 1 IRP Terms of Reference Consultation Appendix D Page 2...

AI summary The document outlines several recommendations for modifying the Terms of Reference (TOR) for the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), including the need for NS Power to select a Preferred Resource Plan based on specific criteria, the development of performance indicators, and the inclusion of transmission and distribution system considerations. It also emphasizes the importance of regulatory compliance in modeled scenarios and suggests scheduling the IRP kickoff stakeholder workshop as soon as possible.

er workshop” planned for Dec 2019/Jan 2020 should be scheduled as soon as possible, have the date(s) known to stakeholders as soon as possible and that the agenda be circulated in advance. 9. At least two additional weeks should be added t...

AI summary EfficiencyOne recommends scheduling the 'IRP workshop' as soon as possible, adding additional time for review of the Draft Analysis Plan and Draft Assumptions, and ensuring stakeholders are involved in the preparation of Candidate Resource Plans to improve the quality of the Integrated Resource Planning process.

IRP Terms of Reference Consultation Appendix D Page 3 of 4 MEMORANDUM Scenarios Recommendation 12. The ToR should describe the process by which NS Power will engage with stakeholders to develop Candidate Resource Plans, and how NS Power wi...

AI summary This text discusses recommendations for the Terms of Reference (TOR) for the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), including stakeholder engagement in scenario development, consideration of the Sustainable Development Goals Act (SDGA), the Atlantic Clean Energy Initiative, the Clean Power Roadmap, and the inclusion of carbon costs in modelling. It also raises questions about stochastic analysis and carbon credit revenues.

es A. MacDuff Direct +1 (902) 444 8619 [email protected] Purdy's Wharf Tower II 1300-1969 Upper Water Street PO Box 730 Halifax NS Canada B3J 2V1 Tel +1 (902) 425 6500 Fax +1 (902) 425 6350 Our File: 179164 December 6, 2019 M...

AI summary Port Hawkesbury Paper LP (PHP) supports the draft Terms of Reference for the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) 2020 but suggests adding an opportunity for stakeholder comments after the March 2020 Interim Modeling Progress workshop.

ight be productive to add an opportunity in the schedule for stakeholders to submit written comments following that workshop for consideration by NS Power’s team and the Board’s staff and consultants. PHP is appreciative of NS Power’s effo...

AI summary The document discusses the submission of written comments by stakeholders following a workshop, and appreciation for NS Power’s comprehensive Terms of Reference. It also mentions a draft of the Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) Terms of Reference and a request for feedback.

ts: Final Modeling results circulated to stakeholders June 4 2020 Final Modeling & Analysis stakeholder workshop June 2020 Stakeholder comments on Modeling & Analysis June 18 2020 If the modeling is really final, it is not clear how useful...

AI summary The text discusses concerns about the timing and usefulness of stakeholder feedback on final modeling results for the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). It highlights the potential lack of value in providing feedback after final results are circulated, suggesting earlier sharing of interim results could yield more meaningful input. The text also references a draft IRP Terms of Reference and a request for comments from stakeholders.

possible. If there are questions or you want to discuss, please let me know. Brian IRP Terms of Reference Consultation Appendix H Page 1 of 1 From: Stephen Thomas Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 2:17 PM To: Godbout, Nicole Cc: Lefler, L...

AI summary The email discusses feedback on the draft Terms of Reference for the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), expressing general support but raising concerns about the lack of formal participant status and stakeholder funding, which limits engagement from smaller stakeholders.

om established stakeholders with significant independent resources. For us, this is an issue to be discussed with UARB as well as yourselves, but it’s a major barrier in involvement from stakeholders. The overall level of transparency and...

AI summary The letter discusses concerns about stakeholder engagement and transparency in the Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) process. It highlights barriers to meaningful participation and requests discussion with the UARB. AREA provides feedback on the draft Terms of Reference for the IRP and emphasizes the need for a more reasonable timeline for stakeholder input.

of AREA’s position. We remain open to discussing such at NSPI’s earliest convenience so that AREA and NSPI can resolve the issues before the IRP’s official start to ensure a more streamlined process. • The Purpose states that this exercise...

AI summary The text outlines AREA's concerns with the Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) process, emphasizing the need to align objectives with least-cost strategies, address stakeholder concerns regarding time constraints, and ensure the process benefits ratepayers rather than NSPI. It highlights issues with the current assumptions and timeline for stakeholder engagement.

to challenge NSPI’s work, review that 3rd party’s results and then formulate a position. It is unreasonable to expect all of that stakeholder work can be completed within two weeks. Alternative Resource Energy Authority, c/o Town of Antigo...

AI summary The text discusses the need for sufficient time to review and challenge NSPI’s work, with comments on the pre-IRP report being reserved until further analysis can be conducted. The message is directed to Nova Scotia Power and includes several stakeholders involved in the process.

explore ways to cooperate with municipalities to advance resiliency and emissions reduction. In reviewing the evaluation criteria and process, I offer the following questions for your consideration: • Will the IRP address access to equitab...

AI summary The text discusses the need for the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) to address equitable energy access and align with HalifACT 2050 objectives. It raises questions about validation of assumptions and collaboration with stakeholders such as the Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) to advance climate action.

1. As a general point to note, it is imperative that sufficient time be granted for stakeholder review, and the ToR should be explicit in defining these review periods. More so, the amount of time prescribed should be commensurate with the...

AI summary The text emphasizes the importance of allocating sufficient time for stakeholder review and explicitly defining review periods in the Terms of Reference (ToR) to ensure thorough consideration of materials. The message is signed by Austen Hughes, Vice President - Operations at Natural Forces.

PO Box 910 ● Halifax, Nova Scotia ● Canada ● B3J 2W5 January 17, 2020 Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 1692, Unit “M” Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: M08...

AI summary NS Power submitted draft Terms of Reference (TOR) for its 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB). The filing incorporated feedback from stakeholders, including the Small Business Advocate (SBA) and Envigour Policy Consulting Inc. (on behalf of Natural Forces, QUEST, and Marine Renewables Canada). The SBA and Envigour expressed general support for the TOR, with no further comments from the SBA.

ve and uncontroversial. NS Power looks forward to continuing this engagement as it moves forward with the formal IRP process in 2020. Yours truly, Niccole Godbout Director, Regulatory Affairs c. 2020 IRP Stakeholders Page 4 of 4

AI summary NS Power expresses commitment to engaging stakeholders in the 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process, emphasizing collaboration as the process moves forward. The letter is signed by Niccole Godbout, Director of Regulatory Affairs.

May 22, 2020 Via Email Ms. Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Friis, Re: P-884 - M08929, NS Power’s Integrated Resource Plan On...

AI summary NS Power is providing a progress report on the Integrated Resource Plan project to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, detailing completed work, stakeholder engagement, and upcoming steps to finalize the report by September 30, 2020.

th a progress report on work completed and stakeholder engagement to date, as well as a view of the steps to come to achieve completion of the Final Report for filing with the Board in September 2020. As the Board is aware, NS Power initia...

AI summary NS Power provided a progress report on the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process, including pre-IRP analyses and stakeholder engagement. A Final Pre-IRP Report was circulated in November 2019, and the Terms of Reference for the core IRP process were approved. Stakeholder feedback informed the Assumptions and Scenarios and Modeling Plan, finalized in March 2020.

m NS Power showing how stakeholder feedback was addressed. These are both also available on the IRP website, and a copy of these documents are attached as Appendix B and C. May 22, 2020 D. Friis Since finalization of the Assumptions and Sc...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power (NS Power) has been working on the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and has updated stakeholders on the progress of the Modeling phase. A virtual workshop was held, and feedback has been addressed. The release of Modeling Results has been delayed from June 5 to June 26, with a stakeholder workshop planned for early July.

h stakeholders to discuss questions and comments. The pre-IRP engagement activities are summarized in Figure 1 below. Figure 1: Pre-IRP 2019 Stakeholder Engagement Activities

AI summary The text mentions pre-IRP engagement activities and references Figure 1, which summarizes these activities. It highlights stakeholder discussions and the involvement of stakeholders in the process.

 
 
!
 "
-#)
#&
( 
#$$#&()" (-
(#
$&(  $(
"
( 
$&2 
+#& ' #$'
"
 ')'' #"1

"
"(  $( #"
#
'' #"
9>
#"
) )'(
;<:
5
;C1< 
&' #"7
( (
'
"
"'( 
"
#$&( "
"

#&

")!&
#
-&'1

 '
)"...

AI summary The text discusses the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and related deliverables, including the need for accurate forecasting and the importance of stakeholder engagement in the planning process. It highlights the role of the Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) in delivering the IRP and the significance of incorporating demand-side management and renewable energy resources into the plan.

IRP Update Appendix 1 Page 183 of 487 Attachment 12 - Pre-IRP Deliverables Page 4 of 4
  
 
"
 ( #"
(#
( 
# /
( 
&' )&"
"(&
'
( 
# #+ "
 ( #"
#!!"('4%)'( #"'0

• !"
'$#"'
)'(#!&
"...

AI summary The document discusses the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) update and pre-IRP deliverables, including topics such as demand-side management, energy efficiency, and the planning reserve margin. It outlines the need for stakeholder engagement, regulatory compliance, and the evaluation of energy resources.

Appendix A: Energy + Environmental Economics (E3), Deep Decarbonization in Nova Scotia: Phase 1 Report Appendix B: IRP Assumptions Appendix C: IRP Scenarios & Modeling Plan Appendix D: IRP Relative Rate Effect Model Appendix E: IRP Modelin...

AI summary The document outlines various appendices related to an integrated resource plan (IRP) for Nova Scotia, including modeling assumptions, scenarios, rate effect models, and stakeholder engagement materials. It includes findings, action plans, and responses to previous directives.

1.1 Introduction In the 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), Nova Scotia Power puts forward a long-term strategy for delivering safe, reliable, affordable and clean electricity to customers across Nova Scotia. At its core, the plan illustr...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power's 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) outlines a strategy for clean, reliable, and affordable electricity aligned with provincial decarbonization goals under the Sustainable Development Goals Act (SDGA). The plan emphasizes stakeholder engagement, electrification of sectors like transportation, and near-term actions to transition to a decarbonized grid, supported by collaborative input from workshops and consultations.

1.5 The IRP Planning Process Nova Scotia Power's 2020 IRP reflects a detailed effort over more than a year to create an electricity strategy for the future. In consultation with stakeholders, Nova Scotia Power has produced several interim...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power's 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) involved extensive stakeholder consultation and iterative planning, producing interim documents and an Action Plan/Roadmap. The IRP serves as a flexible, long-term directional guide for resource strategies, emphasizing transparency, stakeholder input, and adaptive decision-making to meet future electricity needs.

2.2 Objectives of the IRP As a regulated utility with an obligation to serve customers, planning for the future is a responsibility and requirement for Nova Scotia Power. The IRP is a long-term planning exercise that establishes the direct...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power's Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) outlines long-term objectives focused on developing a robust, risk-weighted, lowest-cost electricity strategy that ensures safe, reliable, and affordable energy delivery while supporting provincial decarbonization. The IRP also includes an Action Plan and Roadmap for implementation and emphasizes collaborative, transparent planning processes with stakeholder engagement.

2.3 Process for the IRP Prior to initiating the core IRP process, Nova Scotia Power undertook a number of pre-IRP studies per the recommendations of the Generation Utilization and Optimization Report10 (completed by the Nova Scotia Utility...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power conducted pre-IRP studies, including a PRM and Capacity Study, Resource Options Study, and Demand Response Options Study, based on recommendations from prior reports. Stakeholder engagement was carried out in 2019, and a Final Pre-IRP Report was issued in October 2019. The IRP modeling process followed a detailed Terms of Reference with stakeholder workshops between modeling stages.

2.6 Stakeholder Consultation and Public Process Nova Scotia Power's IRP establishes the strategic direction for the electricity future of Nova Scotia; stakeholder input is integral to this process. Commencing with the pre-IRP deliverables...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power's Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) emphasizes stakeholder consultation and public engagement throughout the process. A public website was established for transparency, and workshops were held at key milestones. Stakeholder input led to adjustments in analysis and additional modeling, enhancing the robustness of the IRP. Direct one-on-one meetings with stakeholders and their consultants also facilitated detailed discussions.

onse to the below documents: i) 2020 IRP Draft Assumptions Set (Jan 20, 2020) ii) 2020 IRP Draft Assumptions Addendum/Update (Feb 3, 2020) iii) 2020 IRP Draft Analysis Plan It is also important to note in this submission that the capacity...

AI summary The submission highlights concerns about the limited capacity of the Ecology Action Centre (EAC) and other organizations to engage effectively in the 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process due to a lack of financial and structural support. The EAC emphasizes the need for updated mandates from the Department of Energy and Mines or Nova Scotia Power to address climate change and environmental concerns effectively.

edule. We’d like to clarify that this is still indeed what NS Power intends to do and, if so, clarify why the “operability screening” is a necessary additional step. 3. Release of modeling information Does NSP plan to provide modeling info...

AI summary The document raises concerns about the lack of clarity in NS Power's evaluation criteria for the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), suggesting that assigning weights and color codes is arbitrary and should be avoided. It also questions the timing and process for sharing modeling information with stakeholders.

pical operational profile and duration of these systems will provide ready early evaluation of emerging solutions as applied to specific operational conditions in Nova Scotia. Sustainability Advocate The capacity of EAC to engage in this p...

AI summary The EAC highlights that the 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process lacks sufficient financial and structural support for sustainability advocates, limiting their ability to engage effectively. This issue is ongoing, and ad hoc sustainability oversight is expected to continue until a more robust mandate is established.

d by stakeholders. Finally, we provided some suggestions related to how the Company can continue the valuable stakeholder engagement process it has maintained thus far in the IRP process. •

AI summary The document mentions suggestions for the Company to continue its stakeholder engagement process in the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process, as noted by stakeholders.

• The preliminary results included a metric calculating an average cost of generation, but the Company was uncertain as to whether it would be used going forward. The Company should provide metrics to help provide insight on affordability...

AI summary The text outlines recommendations for the Company to provide detailed metrics and formulas for portfolio analysis, including affordability, capital investment, and imported power reliance. It also emphasizes the importance of transparency and stakeholder engagement in the process.

recent announcement of a 150 hour duration battery demonstration by Form Energy and Great River Energy in Minnesota. Timeline EAC-04 Recommend an extension for more stakeholder interaction, NS Power and the Board have adjusted the final to...

AI summary The document discusses a recent battery demonstration in Minnesota and mentions an extension of the IRP process to November 30, 2020, to allow for more stakeholder interaction. It also confirms the availability of a transmission line option in all Regional Integration scenarios.

Nova Scotia Power IRP Final Report Appendix J Page 240 of 245 IRP Participant Comments and NS Power Response July 2020 Metrics SBA-04 Now that the initial modeling is complete and stakeholders NS Power has refined the definition of several...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate (SBA-04) suggests that a stakeholder exchange or technical session be held to discuss proposed metrics from NS Power's IRP. NS Power has refined some metrics and incorporated feedback from stakeholders and discussions with IRP participants.

er. We other stakeholders and during subsequent offer the following additional comments: discussions with individual IRP participants.

AI summary The text references additional comments provided by stakeholders and discussions with individual IRP participants during a regulatory proceeding.

Process SBA-06 The Company has maintained extensive communication and NS Power has continued the significant participant stakeholder engagement efforts during the development of engagement that has occurred so far during the IRP Small Busi...

AI summary The Company has engaged extensively with stakeholders during the development of pre-IRP deliverables and recommends continued transparency and collaboration. It suggests technical sessions and written comments on metrics choice, analytical results, findings, and the Road Map & Action Plan before the Final Report submission.

Findings and Action Plan items via an evergreen IRP process. This process should facilitate regular updating of the IRP model as conditions change and technology or market options develop.” The capacity of EAC to engage in this process is...

AI summary The 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process is criticized for lacking financial and structural support for stakeholder participation, particularly for organizations like the Ecology Action Centre (EAC), which face limited capacity to engage in the planning process. Nova Scotia Power acknowledges the issue and plans to adopt an 'evergreen' IRP process going forward.

is the purview of the governments. Envigour Memo September 16, 2020 Page 1 of 3 Nova Scotia Power IRP Final Report Appendix K Page 206 of 264 We would also note that the IRP attracted more interest and participation from stakeholders than...

AI summary The document highlights the high level of stakeholder engagement in the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process, noting peak online participation. It emphasizes the need for clarity on maintaining the plan's relevance and suggests a structured pathway for future engagement, including regular workshops on clean technology and climate change.

and costs. The declining costs for technologies such as wind, solar, offshore wind and storage should be a particular focus. The workshop could also include cross-over fuels such as RNG and hydrogen. The first part of the workshop would be...

AI summary The text discusses the need for workshops focused on declining technology costs, including wind, solar, and storage, and their impact on the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). It suggests involving stakeholders, commissioning papers, and organizing public-facing events managed by not-for-profit organizations. Regular workshops are recommended to update the IRP and engage the public on energy transformation.

iples that should continue to guide NS Power’s long-term strategy going forward: 1. Ongoing Stakeholder Engagement 2. Flexibility 3. Rate Impacts 1. Ongoing Stakeholder Engagement PHP is appreciative of NS Power’s efforts to actively and f...

AI summary PHP acknowledges NS Power's commitment to stakeholder engagement and flexibility in its long-term planning. It supports the development of new strategies and programs, as well as the continuous refinement of the IRP process through regular engagement sessions.

red fast assets. NS Power welcomes more specific examples of successful wind and battery integration at non- acting peakers would reveal that battery storage would be the right direction to proceed significant cost. in terms of reaching ca...

AI summary NS Power discusses the need for battery storage in achieving carbon neutrality and mentions the regulatory framework's consideration of upstream methane emissions. It also notes the limited capacity of organizations like the EAC to participate due to funding and process limitations in the 2020 IRP.

generating units. Stakeholder Envigour We would also note that the IRP attracted more interest and participation from NS Power is pleased with and appreciates the level of stakeholder engagement and believes this has Engagement (Quest / st...

AI summary The document highlights the level of stakeholder engagement during the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process, noting high participation with 170 online call registrations. NS Power appreciates the engagement and believes it improved the IRP process.

5,714 $ 5,415 $ 11,782 $ 2,519 2030 $ 7,835 $ - $ 6,297 $ 6,297 $ 3,241 $ 7,412 $ 7,487 $ 6,520 $ 6,203 $ 4,975 $ 6,472 $ 5,453 November 6, 2020 Results / Roadmap / Action Plan Stakeholder Comments Matrix Page 29 of 29 Nova Scotia Power IR...

AI summary CanREA submitted comments on Nova Scotia Power’s 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Draft Report, acknowledging the effort but expressing concerns that some stakeholder input was not adequately considered, potentially affecting the accuracy and reliability of the IRP for future planning.

sions intensity, or decreased usage of the plants. Please clarify this statement. Introduction The 2020 IRP process represents a significant investment of time and resources for NS Power, the IRP Working Group, and stakeholders participati...

AI summary The 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process required significant time and resources from NS Power and stakeholders, adding complexity compared to previous IRP processes in Nova Scotia. NS Power has engaged stakeholders extensively, including through nine public workshops and six rounds of formal submissions.

Category Participant Comment NS Power Response transport. This will help us align well with the principles Determining savings in gasoline consumption from the of just recovery and sustainability. In addition, it is transport sector is out...

AI summary The EAC emphasizes the need for ongoing, transparent, and inclusive planning, suggesting future iterations should be managed by an independent third party. NS Power responds by highlighting its transparent and collaborative approach in conducting the integrated resource plan, including technical conferences and workshops at key stages.

ater clarity change and technology or market options develop, and on how key assumptions will eventually play out. As as Action Plan items are completed or significantly such, PHP appreciates that NSPI has acknowledged the advanced. Per IR...

AI summary The text emphasizes the importance of flexibility in the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) as key assumptions and external factors evolve. It acknowledges the need for regular updates and stakeholder input to adapt to changes in the energy sector.

Category Participant Comment NS Power Response As such, PHP recommends that together with annual updating on the status of the IRP, that NSPI also endeavor to bring forward the results of the planned ongoing study work, and other informati...

AI summary PHP recommends that NSPI provide regular updates on the IRP and share information on opportunities in the electricity sector. PHP emphasizes the importance of collaboration and timely information sharing to achieve the Province's sustainable development goals in a least-cost manner.

renewable energy resources. However similar transitions have been successfully achieved in other jurisdictions.’ PHP -‘PHP does not have any specific comments with respect to 2020-09-18; p.1/2 NS Power’s proposed 2020-11-13; p.1/2 Findings...

AI summary PHP does not have specific comments on NS Power’s proposed Findings, Action Plan, and Roadmap but emphasizes the importance of ongoing stakeholder engagement, flexibility, and consideration of rate impacts in NS Power’s long-term strategy. Flexibility is highlighted as essential given the dynamic nature of the energy sector.

Scotia Power IRP Final Report Appendix M Page 7 of 43 Nova Scotia Power IRP Summary of Stakeholder Comments specific to Findings, Action Plan and Roadmap

AI summary The document presents a summary of stakeholder comments related to the Findings, Action Plan, and Roadmap from the Nova Scotia Power Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Final Report Appendix M, Page 7 of 43.

Scotia Power IRP Final Report Appendix M Page 10 of 43 Nova Scotia Power IRP Summary of Stakeholder Comments specific to Findings, Action Plan and Roadmap

AI summary This section of the Nova Scotia Power Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Final Report summarizes stakeholder comments related to findings, action plans, and the roadmap. It highlights feedback and considerations from stakeholders in the context of the IRP process.

Forces PHP Generally supportive with comments on importance of 2020-11-13; p.1/2-2/2 flexibility and collaboration: -‘As opportunities may arise in a host of areas, such as the ability to cost share transmission infrastructure build outs w...

AI summary PHP emphasizes the importance of collaboration and information sharing among stakeholders to achieve Nova Scotia's sustainable development goals in the least cost manner. They highlight opportunities such as cost-sharing transmission infrastructure and advancing renewable capacity. SBA did not provide a comment.

that developments in relation to the “signposts” identified in the report will confirm that higher wind trajectories are beneficial to rate payers and to furtherance of broader policy objectives, and we urge that a clear plan is developed...

AI summary Natural Forces emphasizes the importance of analyzing higher wind trajectories for their benefits to rate payers and policy objectives, urging a clear plan and timely completion. Nova Scotia Power (NSP) has no comment on the matter.

ess. Envigour Supports regular stakeholder engagement for additional 2020-09-16; p. 2/3 updates and trends; Suggests planning evergreen process to start in Q4 2020 with 2020-11-13; p. 2/3 a view to broader stakeholder engagement in Q2 or Q...

AI summary Various stakeholders express support for an evergreen Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process, emphasizing ongoing stakeholder engagement and regular updates. Heritage Gas suggests monitoring the existing CT fleet, while PHP recommends annual IRP status updates. Wolfville highlights challenges for smaller entities and notes that the Action Plan and Roadmap will be vetted for compliance with provincial legislation.

c. (“Synapse”), and Energy Environmental Economics, Inc. (“E3”), NSPI’s consultant on the IRP. We have also attended and participated in the stakeholder sessions held at various points in the process. Our comments here serve multiple purpo...

AI summary The text discusses the assessment of NSPI’s compliance with Bates White recommendations from the 2016-2017 FAM Audit Report, focusing on the IRP process, stakeholder engagement, and the 2020 IRP Report. It highlights concerns about transparency, stakeholder input, and the need for additional context in the report.

, section 6.8.5. 34 Bates White Rebuttal Evidence, M09288, August 29, 2019, page 26. 11 Bates White Comments On NSPI Final IRP Report 8. Determine Reasonable Effective Load Carrying Capability of Wind Our recommendation then addressed the...

AI summary Bates White's rebuttal evidence (M09288) highlights NSPI's compliance with recommendations to assess wind resource ELCC and conduct a planning reserve margin study. The text emphasizes stakeholder and Board involvement in the IRP process, citing E3's industry-standard methodology for ELCC estimation.

nd. 9. Allow for Board and Stakeholder Review and Input Our recommendation concluded by addressing the involvement of the Board and stakeholders in the IRP process. We stated: Allow for Board and stakeholder review and input. IRPs are only...

AI summary The text highlights NSPI's compliance with recommendations for stakeholder and Board review of the IRP process, including workshops, document access, and written comments. It also references proceeding M08929 for Board review of the 2020 IRP Report.

REVIEW OF NOVA SCOTIA POWER'S 2020 INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN completed."[34](#page-17-0) The term "evergreen" suggests a frequent update process, with many small changes, rather than a long process cycle. This is an interesting idea, and we...

AI summary The document critiques NS Power's 'evergreen' Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process, noting ambiguity around update frequency and stakeholder consultation. It recommends engaging active IRP stakeholders to clarify the process and obtain Board feedback on defining 'evergreen' criteria.

January 20, 2021 VIA EMAIL Ms. Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood: Re: M08929 - NS Power's Integrated Resource Plan (...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate (SBA) participated in NS Power Inc's (NSPI) stakeholder engagement process for its Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). The SBA acknowledges NSPI's collaboration and notes that stakeholder feedback was incorporated into the IRP Final Report, which is described as comprehensive.

A. Stakeholder involvement The SBA has participated extensively in the stakeholder input process implemented by NSPI and its consultants. The presentation of the pre-IRP studies and the step-by-step process of the IRP, from assumptions thr...

AI summary The SBA actively participated in NSPI's stakeholder process for the IRP, providing written feedback and engaging in discussions. NSPI incorporated stakeholder input into the IRP analysis, with SBA consultants noting the process added value to the final product.

B. Detailed Board review The SBA comments are being provided as part of an informal Board review process and not a full Board paper hearing. It is important for NSPI to keep in mind that general approval of the IRP by the Board is not appr...

AI summary The SBA emphasizes that informal Board review of the IRP does not equate to approval for capital expenditures. It stresses the need for specific resource economic evaluations and formal Board applications, alongside stakeholder engagement, for any IRP-related expenditures. Clear understanding of required regulatory approvals is urged before submitting applications.

III. Evergreen IRP Process The IRP provides a detailed review ofNSPI's extensive planning efforts conducted over the last 18 months. The multiple analyses, along with the detailed assumptions developed by NSPI as inputs into the analyses,...

AI summary NSPI's Evergreen IRP Process aims to continuously update resource planning assumptions as conditions change. The SBA urges clarity on update content and stakeholder involvement. The IRP's signposts lack detailed procedures for triggering plan changes. Financial implications of $10B+ investments and credit rating risks are highlighted as critical issues.

B. Coordination with New Brunswick The prospect of Regional Integration is enticing, as it suggests the ability to efficiently manage our electricity needs, with a strong backup from New Brunswick and beyond. However, the term 'integration...

AI summary The text discusses challenges in regional electricity integration with New Brunswick, highlighting potential risks to Nova Scotia's Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) if New Brunswick declines participation. It emphasizes the need for stakeholder engagement and caution in relying on cross-provincial collaboration to ensure ratepayer interests are protected despite conflicting demands.

X. Specific Comments on Roadmap The SBA interprets the Roadmap of the IRP as insufficient. The Roadmap has some excellent content but provides no direction. The Roadmap items are basically another action plan list. The roadmap should be mo...

AI summary The SBA criticizes the IRP Roadmap for being insufficient and lacking strategic direction, calling it merely an action plan list. It recommends enhancing the Roadmap through stakeholder engagement to ensure it effectively guides planning and monitors necessary changes.

General Comments Heritage Gas believes that NSPI's approach to an evergreen IRP will be valuable in allowing all parties to continue to participate as NSPI conducts the numerous follow-up analysis the IRP calls for and the status of underl...

AI summary Heritage Gas supports NSPI's evergreen IRP process but emphasizes the need for competitive energy alternatives to achieve SDGA goals. They advocate for collaboration among providers, government, and stakeholders to ensure cost-effective, sustainable solutions. Heritage Gas also highlights the importance of stakeholder engagement in IRP updates.

Supporting Goals In addition, SCCF is committed to the following goals: - Decarbonizing the electric and transportation sectors, reducing oil use by 50 percent by 2030, and achieving 100 percent clean energy in all sectors by 2050; - Shift...

AI summary SCCF outlines goals to decarbonize sectors, address inequities, protect ecosystems, promote environmental education, and mobilize climate action. Emphasizes 100% clean energy by 2050, 30% ecosystem protection by 2030, and equity in environmental justice. Aligns with broader climate and social justice movements.

Responses and Recommendations Summarized Overarching Theme IRP Response Relevance Recommendations Stakeholder engagement Results in a subpar consultation process Work with key stakeholders (including neighbouring provinces) to co-develop a...

AI summary The document highlights concerns about stakeholder engagement in the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process, noting a subpar consultation approach. It also criticizes the limited variables assessed in the IRP's economic models, suggesting that environmental and health costs were externalized. Recommendations include co-developing plans with stakeholders and revising the roadmap to prioritize renewables and storage over natural gas conversion.

ecommend that the IRP framework be constrained by climate science, and require all scenarios under consideration to achieve coal shut down before 2030 (see below: IRP Methodology: Account for delays). IRP Methodology (Conflict of Interest)...

AI summary The text argues that the IRP framework should align with climate science, requiring coal shutdown before 2030. It criticizes NSP for potential bias due to Emera's pipeline ownership, calls for methodological improvements like delay buffers, and highlights missed social considerations in the IRP.

February 16, 2021 Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: Re: P-884 - M08929, 2020 Integrated Resource Plan De...

AI summary This document outlines the submission of Nova Scotia Power's 2020 Integrated Resource Plan Report and the subsequent comments filed by various stakeholders, including the Board's consultants and interested parties, as part of the regulatory process.

General Comments on the Stakeholder Process, Approach to the Analysis, and Reasonability of NS Power's Long-term Electricity Strategy Comments from Board Counsel's consultants and Interested Parties were generally very positive in respect...

AI summary Comments from Board Counsel's consultants and interested parties were largely positive regarding NS Power's stakeholder process, analysis quality, and the reasonability of its Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). Synapse and Bates White praised the transparency and professionalism of NS Power's approach, though technical disagreements were noted, with the process overall deemed reasonable.

Responses to Specific Analysis Comments and Tactical Recommendations NS Power appreciates the various comments received. Consistent with the approach that has been used throughout this process, NS Power has provided a detailed matrix with...

AI summary NS Power acknowledges feedback and has provided a detailed response matrix in Appendix A, continuing to use comments to inform future system planning under the IRP process.

9. Allow for Board and Stakeholder Review and Input Allow for Board and stakeholder review and input. IRPs are only as useful as the assumptions that drive them, so it is important that NSPI's IRP methodology and assumptions be vetted by t...

AI summary NSPI ensured stakeholder and Board review of its IRP by engaging third parties, hosting workshops, and allowing written comments. The Board will review the 2020 IRP Report in proceeding M08929, with public comments considered.

Conclusion NS Power wishes to express its appreciation to the Board for supporting a timeline that enabled the level of consultation and collaboration to take place throughout this process which provided the Company with the ability to exp...

AI summary NS Power thanks the Board for enabling thorough consultation during the 2020 IRP process, allowing comprehensive scenario analysis. The company asserts the record is complete, closing the 2020 IRP matter, and commits to executing its IRP Action Plan and Roadmap for long-term electricity strategy, including the Evergreen Process.

IRP Final Report Comments – Bates White No. Topic / Reference Bates White Comment NS Power Response

AI summary This section of the document presents comments from Bates White on the IRP Final Report, along with responses from Nova Scotia Power. The content focuses on the regulatory process and stakeholder engagement related to the Integrated Resource Plan.

from interested parties focused on specific considerations for scenario development, evaluation criteria, and modeling approach. The Board approved the Terms of Reference document on January 21, 2020. Document: 282916 The results of NS Pow...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power's Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) process involved stakeholder engagement, collaboration with consultants like E3, Synapse, and Bates White, and the development of an Action Plan and Roadmap. The Board approved the Terms of Reference in 2020, and the IRP report was filed in November 2020, emphasizing stakeholder input and strategic monitoring.

he IRP analysis, EfficiencyOne is directed to engage NS Power and stakeholders throughout the development of the DSM Potential Study in order to minimize any concerns prior to filing the final report. Board Counsel and Board staff have met...

AI summary The IRP process involves EfficiencyOne collaborating with NS Power and stakeholders on the DSM Potential Study. The Board has engaged Synapse and will involve stakeholders, concluding the generation utilization and optimization matter.

l be addressed by E1's Potential Study (Synapse recommendations 6, 8, and 9 will be addressed in the broader IRP analysis process (e.g. during assumptions development or in the modeling phase itself). NS Power has been providing Board staf...

AI summary NS Power is updating the Board on progress with pre-IRP deliverables, planning workshops to engage stakeholders, and requesting the Board to circulate the update to gather interest in participation. Workshops are scheduled for May, June, and July 2019, with deliverables expected by July 31, 2019.

2019 DSM POTENTIAL STUDY – STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS In addition to the Report and Appendices filed herein, EfficiencyOne believes it would be of assistance to the Board to detail the process EfficiencyOne undertook in relation to sta...

AI summary EfficiencyOne detailed its stakeholder engagement process for the 2019 DSM Potential Study, outlining milestones including scope-of-work reviews, feedback sessions, and report revisions. The process involved DSMAG members and incorporated stakeholder input into the final report, enhancing the study's comprehensiveness and informing the 2020 Integrated Resource Plan.

Stakeholder Review & Comment Period #1 - RFP – Scope of Work On November 6, 2018 EfficiencyOne shared a draft Scope of Work for the 2019 Potential Study Services with the DSMAG, and invited written comments from stakeholders until November...

AI summary EfficiencyOne shared a draft Scope of Work for the 2019 Potential Study Services with the DSMAG and invited stakeholder comments until November 16, 2018. A table summarizes stakeholder feedback and EfficiencyOne's responses to inform the RFP development.

Stakeholder Review & Comment Period #2 – Potential Study Assumptions and Modelling Plan Stakeholder Comment How Comment was Addressed Consider an enhanced consultation process. E1 revised the final Scope of Work by providing a stakeholder...

AI summary Stakeholders requested enhanced consultation processes and model transparency. In response, E1 revised the Scope of Work to include extended comment periods, technical conferences, and greater model transparency, including disclosure of limitations and availability of model data for review by E1, stakeholders, and the UARB.

Stakeholder Comment How Comment was Addressed Stakeholders should have the opportunity to specify potential scenarios. Draft scenarios were provided to stakeholders for review on May 29, 2019 as part of the scenarios/sensitivities and deta...

AI summary Stakeholders requested the inclusion of scenarios showing no incentives and scenarios based on commercially available technologies. The draft scenarios provided on May 29, 2019, included a 'low' scenario and considered only currently available technologies, with no future emerging technology assumptions. Navigant provided an alternative view of Economic Potential using the Program Administrator cost test.

On May 24, 2019, EfficiencyOne shared additional assumption detail with the DSMAG, followed by a draft Baseline Study Report, shared on May 27, 2019 and invited written comments from stakeholders until June 7, 2019. The following table hig...

AI summary EfficiencyOne provided additional assumption details to the DSMAG and shared a draft Baseline Study Report, inviting stakeholder comments until June 7, 2019. The table outlines stakeholder comments and how EfficiencyOne addressed them.

M08929 - Nova Scotia Power Inc. - Integrated Resource Planning and Generation Utilization and Optimization (P-884) On December 16, 2019, Nova Scotia Power submitted draft Terms of Reference for NS Power's 2020 Integrated Resource Plan and...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power submitted draft Terms of Reference for its 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) in December 2019, seeking Board approval. The Board set a timeline for stakeholder comments and responses, noting NSP's collaboration with consultants and stakeholder consultations. The Board generally agreed with the Terms of Reference description.

Envigour stated: Envigour Policy Consulting Inc. has been retained by QUEST and Marine Renewables Canada as their consultant in this matter. We have reviewed the Draft Terms of Reference Document and are generally satisfied with the wordin...

AI summary Envigour suggests including detailed uncertainty analysis on technology price declines in the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). NS Power agrees but asserts this is addressed via 'signposts' in the Strategy. The Board approves the Terms of Reference (TOR) but urges NS Power to consider Envigour's feedback during the IRP process.

March 4, 2020 Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Friis: Re: M08929- Integrated Resource Planning (IRP)...

AI summary NS Power informs the Board of a delay in finalizing the Assumptions and Analysis Plan for the IRP from March 5 to March 11, 2020, with no impact on the overall project schedule ending in September 2020. Stakeholder conferences were held, and the project remains on track.

July 28, 2020 Via Email Ms. Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood, Re: Re: P-884 - M08929, NS Power's Integrated Resour...

AI summary NS Power updates the NSUARB on progress with its Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), including modeling results, stakeholder feedback, and a request for additional time to address comments. The company emphasizes transparency and ongoing engagement with the Board and stakeholders, aiming to finalize the IRP by September 30, 2020.

August 25, 2020 Via Email Ms. Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood, Re: Re: P-884 - M08929, NS Power's Integrated Reso...

AI summary NS Power updated the timeline for its Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) submission, extending the Final Report deadline to October 30, 2020. Stakeholder engagement and feedback periods were adjusted, with the Draft Findings, Roadmap & Action Plan now set for September 2, 2020, and stakeholder comments until September 18, 2020. Remaining IRP milestones remain unchanged.

A Potential Pathway To enable a transparent and inclusive process, we suggest an annual or semiannual extended workshop on climate change and clean technology policies and programs informed by expert views on trends for electricity technol...

AI summary The text proposes annual/semiannual workshops on climate change and clean tech policies, emphasizing declining costs of wind, solar, storage, and crossover fuels like RNG and hydrogen. Workshops would involve stakeholders, experts, and not-for-profits, with outcomes informing the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and enabling regular updates to address technological and policy changes.

October 30, 2020 Via Email Ms. Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood, Re: Re: P-884 - M08929, NS Power's Integrated Res...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) requests an extension until November 27, 2020, to file its Final Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) report with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB), citing the need to address stakeholder feedback on the draft IRP. The Board previously extended the deadline from September 30 to October 30, 2020.

M08929 - NS Power's Integrated Resource Plan This will acknowledge receipt of your letter dated October 30, 2020, requesting a further extension of the date to file the Final Report from October 30, 2020 to November 27, 2020, regarding the...

AI summary The Board approves NS Power's request to extend the deadline for submitting the Final Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Report from October 30, 2020, to November 27, 2020, with adjusted milestone dates for stakeholder engagement and report submission.

November 27, 2020 Via Email Ms. Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood, Re: Re: P-884 - M08929, 2020 Integrated Resource...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power submitted its 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, outlining a strategy to deliver clean, affordable electricity aligned with provincial decarbonization goals. The submission followed stakeholder engagement since 2019 and acknowledges collaboration with board staff, consultants, and customer representatives.

M08929 - NS Power's Integrated Resource Plan (P-884) NS Power filed its Integrated Resource Plan on November 27, 2020. The Board understands that there has been extensive consultation with Interested Parties in connection with the preparat...

AI summary NS Power submitted its Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) on November 27, 2020. The Board will not formally approve the plan but seeks stakeholder input to create a complete record, with comment deadlines set for December 23, 2020, January 20, 2021, and February 16, 2021. The Board panel includes Peter W. Gurnham, Roland A. Deveau, and Steven M. Murphy.

from interested parties focused on specific considerations for scenario development, evaluation criteria, and modeling approach. The Board approved the Terms of Reference document on January 21, 2020. Document: 282916 The results of NS Pow...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power's Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process involved stakeholder engagement, collaboration with consultants (E3), and input from Board staff, Synapse, and Bates White. The IRP report was filed in November 2020, with an Action Plan and Roadmap outlining next steps. The Terms of Reference were approved in January 2020.