Request IR-5: - a) Please compare the expected asset life and provide a complete cost and economic comparison between the underground and overhead options for the proposed 1,750- metre development section, including: - i. Life cycle costs...
AI summary Request IR-5 seeks a detailed lifecycle cost comparison between underground and overhead options for a 1,750-metre development section, including capital, maintenance, and future upgrade costs. Request IR-6 asks for quantified benefits of the underground system over the overhead alternative, focusing on reliability, safety, and operation costs.
please explain why not. - i) Please list and compare all related upgrades, equipment, civil works, and associated costs required for the 12.5 kV to 25 kV conversion under both overhead and underground options, including primary equipment,...
AI summary The document includes several requests for clarification regarding the 12.5 kV to 25 kV conversion project, the 10% contingency required by NS Power, and the relevance of a system impact study dated November 30, 2021. The requests focus on comparing costs, explaining the contingency, and confirming the study's currency and alignment with recent data.