AI-generated summary
· Application · 05/13/2026
Brad Neville appeals NSPI Dispute Resolution Officer billing decision to NSEB, contesting a $3,856.02 charge for 16,377 kWh allegedly reconciled from estimated meter readings
AI summary
- Appellant Brad Neville filed a May 13, 2026 appeal (Reference No. 260513001) of the DRO's May 7, 2026 Final Written Decision, which upheld a March 16, 2026 bill of $3,167.67 for 16,377 kWh, representing a reconciliation of estimated meter readings from the November 5, 2025–March 16, 2026 period (N-2, DRO Decision).
- Neville argues the claimed 20,975 kWh total consumption over 131 days is physically impossible, requiring a constant 6.67 kW average draw, which his Lennox Performance Reports (N-3, October 2025–February 2026) contradict by showing the 3-ton heat pump operated largely in heat pump or fan mode with electric heat demand ranging from 24–30% and total system runtime well below levels consistent with the billed quantity.
- The DRO upheld NSP's position on two grounds: (1) the cumulative, self-reconciling nature of power meters means estimated-reading errors are corrected upon the next actual read, and (2) an April 2026 in-shop meter accuracy test conducted in NSP's Measurement Canada–accredited facility found the meter operating within prescribed limits (N-2, DRO Decision, citing Regulations 5.1, 5.5, 6.4, and 6.7).
- Neville disputes the internal shop test's sufficiency and invokes the Billing Procedures Electricity and Gas Inspection Act to demand an independent Measurement Canada Dispute Test; he also notes a certified electrician inspection found no ground faults or phantom draws, rebutting the DRO's reference to faulty wiring as a possible cause (N-1, Appeal Form).
- The appellant requests the NSEB stay all collection activities on the $3,856.02 disputed balance and order an independent forensic audit of the meter and billing multiplier; the DRO's decision notes Measurement Canada can be reached at 902-426-2525 and that a $46.00 fee applies if the meter is found accurate (N-2, DRO Decision, Regulation 5.5(c) and 6.7).
Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI from the filings it describes. We take care to make it accurate, but errors are possible - and it isn't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →
What was filed
Documents filed on this day
- N-1 NSPI DRO Appeal - redacted
- N-2 DRO Decision Redacted
- N-3 Appellant's Evidence Redacted