Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Demand Side Management" in M11307

Matter: P-884 - Nova Scotia Power Inc. - 2023 Evergreen  Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) -  Action Plan and Roadmap
57 passages 13 documents

Demand Side Management across all matters →

N-1Evergreen IRP - Update to IRP Action Plan and Roadmap - 2023 5 passages
LOAD AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY p. pp. 12-13
LOAD AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY Figure 8 highlights the 26-year (NPVRR) with end effects by scenario and provides a comparison between scenarios to assess the impacts of the various load and energy efficiency assumptions modeled. The results de...

AI summary The text compares NPVRR outcomes across load and energy efficiency scenarios, noting Hybrid Peak (E2) cost savings vs. base load (E1), higher NPVs in Base Plus/Modified Mid DSM scenarios, and Accelerated Electrification's faster resource additions. NS Power highlights program cost gaps and system reserve margin considerations.

Item 2b: Data Collection p. p. 14
Item 2b: Data Collection Continue to collect detailed data, including data on the quantity, flexibility and hourly load shape of incremental electrification demand, to assist with further system planning work. Updated 14 IRP Action Plan an...

AI summary The document emphasizes the need to collect detailed data on electrification demand, including quantity, flexibility, and hourly load shape, to support system planning. It references the Atlantic Clean Power Roadmap and updates to the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Action Plan.

ITEM 4: DEMAND RESPONSE p. p. 16
ITEM 4: DEMAND RESPONSE Demand response (DR) programming and initiatives continue to demonstrate value to the system through a reduction in peak system requirements. The DR Action Plan item supports the continued progression of the demand...

AI summary Demand response (DR) programming reduces peak system requirements, providing value to the system. The DR Action Plan supports advancing DR strategy and evaluating additional DR opportunities.

Item 4a: Pilot Programming p. p. 16
Item 4a: Pilot Programming Continue to progress the Demand Response Strategy via the existing pilot programming, targeting the expansion of the programming to 75MW of nameplate capacity, for deployment by 2025.

AI summary The proceeding seeks to advance the Demand Response Strategy through existing pilot programs, aiming to expand capacity to 75MW by 2025. This focuses on scaling DR initiatives to meet energy management goals.

GLOSSARY p. pp. 21-22
GLOSSARY The modeling scenarios and their descriptions can be accesse[d here.](https://irp.nspower.ca/files/key-documents/annual-evergreen-materials/Evergreen-IRP-Updated-Modeling-Scenarios-Descriptions.pdf) For additional definitions, ple...

AI summary The glossary defines key terms related to energy infrastructure and planning, including the Reliability Tie, Atlantic Loop, Variable Renewable Energy, and Modified Mid DSM. These terms are important for understanding modeling scenarios and integrated resource planning.

N-3Comments - Synapse 2 passages
Preamble p. pp. 3-5
In our opinion, the pre-IRP capacity value study from 2019 (used in the 2020 IRP) does not fully capture the diversity effects that exist among battery energy storage, wind, solar, and demand response resources, and the capacity accreditat...

AI summary The pre-IRP capacity value study from 2019 is criticized for not fully capturing diversity effects among battery energy storage, wind, solar, and demand response resources. This affects the PLEXOS model optimization and the ELCC profile used in the IRP update. An updated study is recommended to better reflect the interactive effects of these resources on portfolio ELCC and capacity expansion modeling.

Table 1. Modeling Scenario NPVRR Metrics p. p. 8
Table 1. Modeling Scenario NPVRR Metrics Scenario Info, All Scenarios Clean Energy Policy Electrification Trajectory Atlantic Loop Sensitivity Scenario Name NPVRR 2025$ NPV Solar 2025$ Effects NPVRR End Solar End Effects NPVRR w/EE + Solar...

AI summary The table presents NPVRR metrics for various modeling scenarios under the Clean Energy Policy, including electrification trajectory, carbon capture, hydrogen, and demand-side management. The scenarios compare NPVRR values and solar effects across different conditions, such as low and high fuel pricing, and modified DSM approaches.

N-4Report of John D. Wilson, Grid Strategies LLC and Paul L. Chernick, Resource Insig... 4 passages
3. Issues Raised by the Evergreen IRP and NS Power's Response to Stakeholder Comments p. p. 0
3. Issues Raised by the Evergreen IRP and NS Power's Response to Stakeholder Comments As noted above, the Evergreen IRP representssubstanfial progress and NS Power'sresponsesto comments on the final modeling results were often quite safisf...

AI summary The Evergreen IRP shows progress, but NS Power did not address stakeholder concerns on DSM program modeling accuracy, a provincial hybrid peak mitigation study, or hydrogen production tariff development. Further evaluation of NS Power's plan is requested, including addressing raised concerns.

A. Hybrid Peak Mifigafion p. pp. 0-2
A. Hybrid Peak Mifigafion Our comments on the final model results noted the inconsistency between the modeling approaches for the costs of customer-owned solar and customer-owned oil/gas heafing systems. NS Power acknowledges that "incorpo...

AI summary The text highlights inconsistencies in modeling customer-owned solar and fossil-fueled heating systems, urging NS Power to address non-peak usage in hybrid peak strategies. It references Eastward Energy's commitment to a provincial study and the 2022 Public Utilities Act revision assigning Efficiency One to strategic electrification programs. A multi-sector study is proposed to evaluate heating options, involving stakeholders like NS Power, Efficiency Nova Scotia, and propane/fuel oil suppliers, with a focus on tradeoff standards and customer behavior shifts.

B. Atlantic Loop p. p. 2
B. Atlantic Loop NS Power confirmed that it has chosen a "No Atlantic Loop" reference scenario (CE1-E1-R2) for planning purposes. (Response to Comments, p. 11) It declined to comment on the likelihood of a contract (or other commitment) fo...

AI summary NS Power has selected a 'No Atlantic Loop' planning scenario, while Bates White highlights financial risks and recommends joint dispatch with New Brunswick. NS Power's valuation methods for bi-directional transactions are criticized as inadequate, with concerns over reliance on uncertain forecasts. The Atlantic Loop's potential benefits and costs are debated, including impacts on system costs and renewable integration.

G. Demand-Side Management (DSM) Programs p. p. 3
G. Demand-Side Management (DSM) Programs Our comments on the final model results raised quesfions about the finding that higher levels of DSM investment do not show a reducfion in either cost or emissions. We asked for further explanafion...

AI summary Stakeholders question NS Power's model results showing minimal cost/emission reductions from higher DSM investment, noting a $7 million savings claim is counterintuitive. NS Power ignored this in their response, and the Board is urged to await further analysis before relying on these results.

N-5Reply Submission - NSPI 4 passages
Additional Study of the Hybrid Peak Mitigation p. p. 8
Additional Study of the Hybrid Peak Mitigation The CA, E1 and EE support continued study of the value of the Hybrid Peak Mitigation electrification profile. Specifically, the study of the potential costs associated with the hybrid peak ele...

AI summary The CA, E1, and EE advocate for further study of the Hybrid Peak Mitigation electrification strategy to assess costs and benefits. NS Power supports the study but recommends external third-party leadership to manage multi-stakeholder coordination, as outlined in Action Plan Item 4b.

Manager, Capital Filings p. p. 11
Manager, Capital Filings Feedback Item # Stakeholder/ Feedback Document Reference Page Theme/Feedback NSPI Response 4 Consumer Advocate Pg. 2 Hybrid Peak Mi�ga�on Our comments on the final model results noted the inconsistency between the...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate raised concerns about inconsistencies in modeling approaches for the costs of customer-owned solar and oil/gas heating systems in the hybrid peak mitigation scenario. NS Power acknowledges the importance of incorporating backup fuel system costs and supports continued study, but suggests it should be led by a third party to ensure multi-stakeholder coordination.

The study should also ask whether energy to meet those peak demands should be stored in a batery, a tank, a lake or in a regionally linked, diversified e p. p. 11
that correctly iden�fying the need for capacity is paramount for all subsequent IRP runs. The study should also ask whether energy to meet those peak demands should be stored in a batery, a tank, a lake or in a regionally linked, diversifi...

AI summary The text discusses the need for accurate identification of capacity in Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) runs and the importance of considering various energy storage options. It also highlights the potential for customer behavior changes due to decarbonization policies and increasing carbon prices. The Consumer Advocate supports exploring joint dispatch with New Brunswick and other provinces, including Newfoundland, for better coordination.

will be released to stakeholders for their review and NS Power will request feedback on the findings. p. p. 11
will be released to stakeholders for their review and NS Power will request feedback on the findings. will be evaluated by further study work (Updated Ac�on Plan page 7), including generator site– specific system impact studies for new var...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of system impact studies for new variable renewable generation and the potential need for synchronous condensers. It mentions the importance of a comprehensive and system-wide review, rather than a generator site-specific approach, due to the increasing integration of renewables.

N-6Refiled Reply Submission Appendix A - NSPI 3 passages
Feedback Item # Stakeholder/ Feedback Document Reference Page Theme/Feedback
(Response to Stakeholders, p. 4) We further pointed out that customers who maintain fossilfueled hea�ng systems for peak condi�ons use those systems beyond peak condi�ons, depending on energy pricing and equipment efficiency. We are concer...

AI summary The feedback highlights concerns that NS Power did not commit to analyzing the broader non-peak use of dual-fueled heating systems by residential and small commercial customers, beyond just peak conditions, which may impact energy pricing and equipment efficiency.

The study should also ask whether energy to meet those peak demands should be stored in a batery, a tank, a lake or in a regionally linked, diversified e
that correctly iden�fying the need for capacity is paramount for all subsequent IRP runs. The study should also ask whether energy to meet those peak demands should be stored in a batery, a tank, a lake or in a regionally linked, diversifi...

AI summary The text emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying capacity needs for Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) runs and explores options for storing energy to meet peak demands, including batteries, tanks, lakes, and regionally linked systems. It also discusses the potential changes in customer behavior regarding heat pumps and the challenges NS Power may face due to decarbonization policies and the long-term financial condition of Eastward.

will be released to stakeholders for their review and NS Power will request feedback on the findings.
will be released to stakeholders for their review and NS Power will request feedback on the findings. will be evaluated by further study work (Updated Ac�on Plan page 7), including generator site– specific system impact studies for new var...

AI summary The document discusses the need for evaluating the integration of synchronous condensers in the context of increased renewable generation and highlights the potential undervaluation of energy efficiency and demand response programs in NSPI's analysis. It suggests a more comprehensive and system-wide approach to assessing these issues.

N-8Electrification Strategy Report 21 passages
Key Finding 2. Most transportation electrification investments produce benefits that exceed costs from the perspective of drivers, utility ratepayers and Nova Scotia. p. pp. 14-17
ashington-Final-Report.pdf](https://www.commerce.wa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Financial-Impact-of-Fuel-Conversion-on-Consumer-Owned-Utilities-and-Customers-in-Washington-Final-Report.pdf) (pg. 3) 8 Massachusetts D.P.U. 20-80, The Role...

AI summary The analysis compares the net present value of adopting heat pump technologies, noting that switching from fuel oil to heat pumps yields homeowner benefits, while electric resistance upgrades may impose net ratepayer costs. Key Finding 4 emphasizes the importance of utility actions in managing transportation loads to minimize costs and maximize ratepayer benefits.

Short-term Actions, Customer Programs & Capital Investments p. p. 20
- In this instance, E3 does not believe that submetering or installing a second meter for EVs is necessary to support EV adoption in the near-term. These options have generally been costly, and have faced implementation challenges, includi...

AI summary E3 suggests that submetering for EVs is not necessary in the near-term due to cost and implementation challenges. Instead, the focus should be on whole-home rate designs. Nova Scotia Power is piloting opt-in dynamic pricing programs, and AMI is essential for managing loads and enabling TOU rates.

Long-Term Strategy and Planning p. p. 20
Long-Term Strategy and Planning Recommendation 5. Fully incorporate electrification strategy findings, including peak impacts and mitigation strategies, into utility planning models. - Model impacts on resource needs and costs : Reliably s...

AI summary The recommendation emphasizes the need for Nova Scotia Power to fully integrate electrification strategy findings into its planning models, considering impacts on resource needs, reliability, and affordability. It highlights the importance of evaluating peak mitigation strategies, reliability benefits from managed loads, and affordability implications of electrification.

Identify underserved communities and prioritize investments to ensure equitable access: p. p. 20
Identify underserved communities and prioritize investments to ensure equitable access: Without intentional program design, electrification at scale is expected to pose challenges that disproportionately impact lower-income and disadvantag...

AI summary The text discusses the importance of identifying underserved communities to ensure equitable access to electrification benefits. It highlights challenges faced by lower-income and disadvantaged communities, such as limited access to charging infrastructure and the need for infrastructure upgrades in areas served by radial transmission lines. It emphasizes the need for Nova Scotia Power and E1 to collaborate with governments to address these issues and prioritize investments that promote equity.

2.2.3 Example Utility Actions p. p. 33
n/contractors/value-of-distributed-energy-resources) Context: Net Zero and the Role of Electrification The Economics of Electrification in Nova Scotia: The Economics of Electrification in Nova Scotia independent system operators (ISOs) or...

AI summary The text discusses the role of utilities in enabling vehicle-to-grid (V2G) programs, including challenges such as uncertainty around EV availability and customer enrollment. It highlights the use of cost-benefit analysis in regulatory approvals and the expansion of time-varying rates to support electrification and distributed energy resources.

2.3.3 Example Utility Actions p. p. 38
2.3.3 Example Utility Actions In many jurisdictions with Net Zero targets, utilities have adopted programs, incentives, and customer education programs to support building electrification. It is increasingly common practice for utilities a...

AI summary Utilities in jurisdictions with Net Zero targets are implementing programs to support building electrification, including heat pump rebates, all-electric construction, retrofits, and smart thermostats. Some use ratepayer funds, while others leverage provincial budgets, local taxes, and carbon fees. Examples include Sacramento Municipal Utility District and utilities like BC Hydro and Hydro-Quebec.

3.2.1 Overview of E3's EV Load Shaping Tool p. pp. 41-43
3.2.1 Overview of E3's EV Load Shaping Tool To calculate electricity bills and supply costs for EV charging, E3 developed a forecast of potential EV charging loads consistent with achieving Nova Scotia's policy goals. Charging loads depend...

AI summary E3 developed an EV Load Shaping Tool to forecast EV charging loads based on Nova Scotia's policy goals. The tool models driving and charging behavior using a bottom-up approach, considering factors like vehicle type, charging access, and driving patterns. It distinguishes between unmanaged, managed, and VGI charging scenarios to calculate electricity bills and supply costs.

3.2.3 Transportation Scenarios p. pp. 44-45
3.2.3 Transportation Scenarios E3 modeled four scenarios for EV load shapes based on the access to rates and level of EV charge management, in order to evaluate potential impacts on load and system peak. 51 All scenarios assume adoption of...

AI summary E3 modeled four scenarios for EV load shapes based on access to rates and charge management, evaluating impacts on load and system peak. Scenarios include unmanaged charging, blended, managed with TOU, and managed with VGI aggregation, considering TOU responsiveness and load management techniques.

3.3.3 Building Scenarios p. pp. 49-50
3.3.3 Building Scenarios In all scenarios modeled, E3 assumes that 100% of sales of heating equipment are heat pumps by 2030 resulting in nearly all residential customers and 96% of commercial customers having heat pumps by 2050. Most scen...

AI summary E3 models various scenarios for heat pump adoption in Nova Scotia by 2030 and 2050, including Current Trends, No Electric Resistance Phaseout, Best-in-Class, and Current Trends Hybrid. These scenarios consider different heat pump technologies, adoption rates, and the impact of demand-side management (DSM) on system performance.

Preamble p. pp. 51-107
While annual load growth is expected to be modest from building electrification, peak load impacts could potentially be large. Under the Current Trends Pre-DSM scenario, buildings are expected to add 673 GWh of load in a 1-in-2 weather yea...

AI summary The text discusses the potential impacts of building electrification on load growth and peak demand in Nova Scotia under different scenarios. It highlights that while annual load growth is expected to be modest, peak load impacts could be significant, especially under the Current Trends Pre-DSM scenario. The adoption of heat pumps and backup fuel systems can influence these impacts.

3.4 Combined Electrification Load Impacts p. pp. 55-56
3.4 Combined Electrification Load Impacts Considering both transportation and buildings, electrification will generate significant electric load and peak impacts. Transportation loads are forecasted to make up a larger portion of annual lo...

AI summary Electrification in Nova Scotia, considering both transportation and buildings, is expected to significantly increase electric load and peak demand. Transportation is projected to contribute more to annual load, while buildings are expected to disproportionately impact peak load, especially during cold winter days.

4.2 Benefit-Cost Analysis Model p. p. 57
4.2 Benefit-Cost Analysis Model E3's Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Model calculates the costs and benefits associated with transportation and building electrification. Costs and benefits in the E3 BCA Model are organized by perspective, usin...

AI summary E3's Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Model evaluates the costs and benefits of transportation and building electrification from three perspectives: Participant Cost Test (PCT), Societal Cost Test (SCT), and Ratepayer Impact Measure (RIM). Each perspective uses a different discount rate to calculate net present value (NPV) and assess the impact of electrification on individuals, society, and non-participating ratepayers.

Key Finding 2. Most transportation electrification investments produce benefits that exceed costs from the perspective of drivers, utility ratepayers and Nova Scotia. p. pp. 80-83
Figure 5-2. Net present value of costs and benefits of adopting light-duty vehicle in 2022, assuming managed charging with load management using vehicle-grid integration Notes: The benefit estimates vary across scenarios based on rates, fu...

AI summary The analysis shows that transportation electrification investments, such as light-duty vehicles, yield net benefits for drivers, ratepayers, and Nova Scotia. However, building electrification requires policy support to encourage the adoption of efficient equipment and manage peak load impacts.

Short-term Actions, Customer Programs & Capital Investments p. p. 86
- Drive customer transition: A transition to more dynamic rates requires significant customer outreach and education and should be implemented gradually to ensure customers can adjust their behavior and avoid abrupt bill changes. Pilot pro...

AI summary The text discusses the need for gradual customer transition to dynamic rates through pilot programs and opt-in rate designs, emphasizing the importance of customer education and outreach. It highlights Nova Scotia Power's efforts with TVP and CPP pilots, and the role of AMI in enabling load management and TOU rates, while noting the need for more dynamic strategies as DER adoption increases.

Long-Term Strategy and Planning p. p. 86
Long-Term Strategy and Planning Recommendation 5. Fully incorporate electrification strategy findings, including peak impacts and mitigation strategies, into utility planning models. - Model impacts on resource needs and costs : Reliably s...

AI summary The recommendation emphasizes the need to fully incorporate electrification strategy findings into utility planning models, focusing on resource needs, reliability impacts, and affordability. It highlights the importance of modeling peak load impacts, evaluating reliability benefits of managed loads, and assessing the equity and affordability implications of electrification.

Partnerships & Customer Engagement p. p. 86
o the mandate of Nova Scotia's electricity efficiency and conservation franchise holder. underserved communities and investments needed to ensure equitable access to electrified mobility and heating. - Third Party EVSE Providers: Work to c...

AI summary The text discusses the need for partnerships and customer engagement in electrification efforts, emphasizing collaboration with third-party EVSE providers, equipment manufacturers, transit operators, and consumer advocates. It also highlights the importance of customer education and training for successful adoption of electrification technologies, particularly in underserved communities.

7.3 Shell Improvement p. pp. 102-103
7.3 Shell Improvement E3 modeled building electrification scenarios with "DSM" and "Pre-DSM." In scenarios with DSM, buildings adopting heat pumps also receive a building shell improvement. E3 used the building simulation software EnergyPl...

AI summary E3 modeled building electrification scenarios with 'DSM' and 'Pre-DSM,' where DSM scenarios include building shell improvements. EnergyPlus simulations showed that retrofitting existing buildings with improved insulation leads to reduced annual service demand, though R-values were slightly lower than new construction due to retrofit limitations.

Sector % Reduction in Annual Service Demand p. pp. 103-104
Sector % Reduction in Annual Service Demand Residential 23% Commercial 14% Table 7-2. EnergyPlus simulations building details Sector Building Type Wall Assembly R-Value (ft2 h R/Btu) Roof Assembly R-Value (ft2 h R/Btu) Glazing Assembly U-V...

AI summary The text presents a table showing the percentage reduction in annual service demand for residential and commercial sectors, as well as building details from EnergyPlus simulations. The data highlights improvements in insulation and energy efficiency under DSM initiatives.

Section 171 p. pp. 104-105
As discussed in Section 3, electrification at scale could potentially have large impacts on system peak loads. Many studies have demonstrated that coupling energy efficiency investments such as weatherization and building shell improvement...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of electrification and energy efficiency measures on system peak loads. It highlights that combining electrification with energy efficiency investments, such as building shell improvements, is critical for cost-effective decarbonization. E3 modeled scenarios showing significant reductions in heating demand for residential and commercial buildings through DSM strategies.

Current Trends All-Electric Best-in-Class p. p. 105
Current Trends All-Electric Best-in-Class Pre-DSM With DSM Pre-DSM With DSM Today's gas and oil heating buildings Adopt ASHP Adopt ASHP Today's electric resistance buildings Adopt ASHP Adopt ASHP Heat pump performance ASHPs are 30% base; 4...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of adopting air-source heat pumps (ASHPs) and building shell improvements on load growth in electrification scenarios. In the Current Trends scenario with DSM, shell measures reduce incremental load growth by 12% in 2050. In the Best-in-Class scenario with DSM, efficiency savings from shell improvements could result in negative incremental load growth.

9.1.5 Marginal Electricity Supply Costs for EV Charging and Buildings p. p. 111
9.1.5 Marginal Electricity Supply Costs for EV Charging and Buildings Electricity supply costs represent the costs that utilities must pay to provide the electricity used for EV charging. There are four components that make up electricity...

AI summary The text discusses the four components of electricity supply costs—energy, capacity, distribution, and transmission—specifically for EV charging and buildings. It outlines how energy costs are based on hourly short-run marginal costs, while capacity, distribution, and transmission costs are derived from Nova Scotia Power and allocated using the PCAF method, which targets the highest net load hours for cost allocation.

N-10Electrification-Strategy-Report-Engagement-Session-Material 2 passages
Key Findings p. pp. 1-6
Key Findings Utility actions through time of use rates and programsto avoid "rebound peaks" at the beginning of off-peak hours to manage transportation loads will be crucial to minimizing costs and achieving ratepayerbenefits Encouraging a...

AI summary Key strategies include using time-of-use rates and programs to manage transportation load peaks, promoting advanced building technologies to reduce peak loads, and NS Power's electrification efforts via the E3 report and DSM initiatives. Collaboration with E1 and DSMAG on rebates and pilots is emphasized for cost-effective electrification.

Cost Benefit Analysis p. pp. 6-7
Cost Benefit Analysis - E3 and NS Power developed a cost benefit analysis tool to enable the analysis of building and transportationelectrificationsolutions and the impactsof various programs. - The metrics produced as part of the cost ben...

AI summary E3 and NS Power developed a cost-benefit analysis tool to evaluate building and transportation electrification solutions. Metrics include participant cost, ratepayer impact, and societal cost tests. The analysis considers EV purchase costs, tax credits, O&M savings, fuel savings, and emission reductions for transportation, while buildings focus on appliance costs, electricity bills, and avoided fuel costs.

91364Submission - SBA 1 passage
Energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) may be undervalued in NSPI analysis
Energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) may be undervalued in NSPI analysis As noted above, the updated IRP requires significant buildout of new resources and capital costs have been very volatile in recent years. EE and DR program...

AI summary The document argues that energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) programs are undervalued in Nova Scotia Power's (NSPI) analysis of the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). EE and DR offer stable costs and can delay new infrastructure, yet recent U.S. research highlights their potential in decarbonizing energy portfolios. NSPI is urged to integrate these resources more comprehensively in future planning.

91365Submission - Energy Storage Canada 1 passage
Appendix: ESC Submission on 2023 Evergreen IRP Action Plan & Roadmap Update (M11307) p. p. 0
Appendix: ESC Submission on 2023 Evergreen IRP Action Plan & Roadmap Update (M11307) - 1. " In the Nova Scotia context with the expected increase in variable renewable energy resources, expansion of transmission ties, and phase out of coal...

AI summary ESC argues that energy storage will play a critical role in Nova Scotia's energy future due to increasing renewables and coal phase-out. They highlight storage's contributions to firm capacity, peak shaving, and reduced wind curtailment, noting the current IRP underestimates its potential due to modeling limitations.

91371Submission - E1 11 passages
2.1 Notable Findings and Observations p. pp. 4-7
, 2023, Page 6. M11307, Bates White Economic Consulting's Comments on Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s Evergreen IRP Action Plan & Roadmap Update, Filed September 8, 2023, Page 7. M11307, Bates White Economic Consulting's Comments on Nova Scotia P...

AI summary E1 recommends considering reduced Plan Flexibility and risk in the Bi-Directional Atlantic Loop scenario. NS Power highlights Hybrid Peak scenarios' cost savings over base load scenarios but notes missing incentive costs. E1 argues these savings stem from excluded Hybrid Peak Mitigation costs and identifies unaccounted customer expenses (e.g., heating system maintenance, fuel costs) in IRP evaluations.

3.2 Base Plus DSM Modeling p. pp. 7-8
3.2 Base Plus DSM Modeling - The IRP scenarios modeled the inclusion of both Base and Modified Mid DSM buildouts but only - included one Base Plus DSM scenario, namely CE1-E1-R1 BPDSM. The absence of an evaluation of - Base Plus DSM within...

AI summary The IRP scenarios evaluated Base and Modified Mid DSM buildouts but omitted comprehensive Base Plus DSM analysis. This limits stakeholder understanding of DSM performance between Base and Modified Mid levels, potentially leading to suboptimal economic outcomes. E1 previously requested inclusion of Base Plus DSM in core scenarios, which was not fulfilled.

- E1 recommends that the NPVRR results be interpreted with caution, considering the complexities p. p. 8
- E1 recommends that the NPVRR results be interpreted with caution, considering the complexities - of the scenarios and the unknowns regarding the performance of different DSM levels.

AI summary E1 recommends caution in interpreting NPVRR results due to the complexities of scenarios and unknowns regarding the performance of different Demand Side Management (DSM) levels.

- 3.3 Risk p. p. 8
- 3.3 Risk - The IRP scenarios include varying levels of risk depending on factors such as resource mix and - selection, in-service dates, retirement dates, and operating reserves. - Notable risks within the 2022 IRP include: - Atlantic Lo...

AI summary The 2022 IRP identifies risks related to resource mix, fuel costs, and peak mitigation effectiveness. Energy efficiency is highlighted as a low-risk, scalable resource, while emerging technologies and legislative changes pose uncertainties. E1 recommends a risk matrix to evaluate technical, legislative, and stakeholder risks in each scenario.

3.4 DSM Beyond Energy Efficiency p. pp. 8-9
3.4 DSM Beyond Energy Efficiency The 2022 Evergreen IRP only considered energy efficiency and demand response as DSM resources. "Base DSM" only considered energy efficiency. To the extent other DSM (e.g., distributed energy resources) acti...

AI summary The 2022 Evergreen IRP limited DSM to energy efficiency and demand response. Other DSM activities (e.g., distributed energy resources) were excluded from modeled savings and expenditures. The text recommends treating these future DSM initiatives as distinct from the 2022 IRP's DSM outcomes.

4. AVOIDED COSTS p. pp. 9-10
4. AVOIDED COSTS Avoided costs, in the context of the IRP, refer to the costs that a utility or system operator can avoid or mitigate by implementing specific resource options or DSM measures. These costs are fundamental considerations whe...

AI summary E1 requests updated avoided costs from NS Power for DSM resources (energy efficiency, solar PV, electrification) to inform the 2026-2030 DSM Plan. Stakeholder engagement with DSMAG is emphasized, with a timeline for modeling starting Q1 2024. E1 also seeks methodology for valuing demand response avoided costs and considers DER/electrification impacts on transmission/distribution.

4.1 High Distributed Energy Resources (HDER) Scenario p. pp. 10-11
4.1 High Distributed Energy Resources (HDER) Scenario - E1 noted that the HDER scenarios, which include significant investment in rooftop solar PV systems, - showed favorable utility NPVRR results. Notably, CE1-E1-R2 HDER stood out with th...

AI summary E1 highlights favorable utility NPVRR results in HDER scenarios, emphasizing customer-sited solar PV's value. NS Power's $3/W solar cost assumption is challenged by E1's lower $2.5/W experience. E1 argues against dismissing HDER scenarios based solely on customer costs, citing unaccounted electrification and hybrid mitigation costs, and recommends further analysis of DERs' full costs/benefits.

6. ACTION PLAN AND ROADMAP p. p. 13
6. ACTION PLAN AND ROADMAP

AI summary The document outlines the action plan and roadmap for implementing the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), focusing on Demand Side Management (DSM) initiatives and regulatory processes under the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB). Key stakeholders include EfficiencyOne (E1), Nova Scotia Power (NS Power), and the DSM Advisory Group (DSMAG).

6.1 Review of Action Plan and Roadmap Items p. p. 13
6.1 Review of Action Plan and Roadmap Items 11 E1 has reviewed the action plan / roadmap sections of the document provided. In addition to the 12 general comments included in the document, E1 has the following additional and specific comme...

AI summary E1 has reviewed the action plan and roadmap sections of a document, adding specific comments to the 12 general ones provided. The review focuses on evaluating the proposed steps and timelines for implementation.

15 Action Plan Item 1b: Regional Integration p. pp. 13-15
into the estimation of avoided costs of T&D. E1 expects these avoided costs to grow - with increased level of system build-out anticipated as part of increased load growth in coming - years. - Action Plan Item 4b: Hybrid Peak Mitigation Sc...

AI summary NS Power and E1 collaborate on initiatives including hybrid peak mitigation, wind integration studies, renewable cost tracking, and electrification forecasts. E1 emphasizes non-technical factors, demand response, and updating load forecasts. Both parties agree on monitoring solar, storage costs, and IRP evolution.

7. CONCLUSION p. pp. 17-18
7. CONCLUSION - E1 appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on, and recommendations related to NS - Power's updated Action Plan and Roadmap and appreciates the opportunity to participate - throughout the 2022 Evergreen IRP Process....

AI summary E1 provides seven recommendations to NS Power regarding the 2022 Evergreen IRP Process, emphasizing criteria evaluation, scenario risk analysis, hybrid peak solution clarity, DSM study limitations, NPVRR interpretation, and risk matrix development for IRP scenarios.

94193Board Decision Letter 1 passage
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS p. p. 0
, on December 22, 2023, NS Power filed its "Path to 2030" plan, which was subsequently made part of the 2024 ACE Plan proceeding, describing how the Utility will meet its 2030 decarbonization targets. Finally, on April 5, 2024, the Legisla...

AI summary NS Power's 'Path to 2030' plan is part of the 2024 ACE Plan proceeding. The Energy Reform (2024) Act establishes a new IESO to take over integrated resource planning. The Board accepts the Evergreen IRP Update but requires further analysis on battery energy storage ELCC and renewable resource interactions. Urgency for 2030 decarbonization targets and engagement with government agencies are emphasized.

96558Letter re: Update - NSPI 1 passage
Section 1 p. p. 0
January 24, 2025 Ms. Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: M11307 - Evergreen IRP Updated Action Plan and Ro...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) submitted an updated Evergreen Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) following a May 2024 directive. The update included stakeholder engagement via a webinar on the Reliability Tie project and Demand Response programming, with additional updates later reflected in the Path to 2030 report submitted with the 2025 ACE Plan.

96745Effective Load Carrying Capacity (ELCC) Study Scope Memo 1 passage
Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) Study Scope Memo February 6, 2025
Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) Study Scope Memo February 6, 2025 In its Decision letter of May 23, 2024, regarding NS Power's 2023 Evergreen IRP Update (Matter M11307), the Board highlighted certain Synapse recommendations and s...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board directed NS Power to update its ELCC study to assess interactive effects of wind, solar, battery storage, and demand response. NS Power supports the update, plans to develop a scope of work by year-end, and proposes three study topics: resource interaction analysis, demand response ELCC recalibration, and seasonal ELCC assessment. The Board emphasized refining diversity benefits and aligning with current programs.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →